Cannabidiol In Patients Research Articles

The use of cannabidiol in patients with Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome and Dravet syndrome in the UK Early Access Program: A retrospective chart review study

PurposeTo evaluate clinical outcomes from the UK Early Access Program in patients aged 2–17 years with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) or Dravet syndrome (DS) treated with plant-derived highly purified cannabidiol (CBD; Epidyolex®; 100 mg/mL oral solution). MethodsRetrospective chart review of data collected from baseline (1 month before CBD treatment initiation) until 12 months’ treatment, CBD discontinuation, death, or loss to follow up. ResultsAt baseline, all 26 patients enrolled (LGS, n = 17; DS, n = 9; male, 73 %; mean [range] age, 11.8 [3.0–17.0] years) experienced motor seizures; 92 % were taking ≥ 1 antiseizure medication. Median (IQR) CBD dosage at 6 months (6 M; n = 12) was 6.0 (2.7) mg/kg/day, and 12 months (12 M; n = 9) 7.3 (2.1) mg/kg/day. Median (IQR) percentage change from baseline for motor seizures was − 56.7 % (60.7) at 6 M (n = 20), and − 60.0 % (53.3) at 12 M (n = 15). Patients experiencing ≥ 50 % and ≥ 75 % reduction in motor seizures were 13/20 (65 %) and 5/20 (25 %) at 6 M, respectively, and 10/15 (67 %) and 6/15 (40 %) at 12 M, respectively. Mean (SD) motor seizure-free days/month were 1.5 (4.3) at baseline (n = 24, missing data n = 2), 2.4 (6.3) at 6 M (n = 18), and 2.7 (5.5) at 12 M (n = 15). At 12 M, CBD retention for patients with follow-up data was 14/19 (74 %), whilst 7/26 (27 %) were lost to follow up. The number of patients reporting ≥ 1 adverse event of special interest (most common: gastrointestinal) was 14/20 (70 %) and 8/15 (53 %) at 6 M and 12 M, respectively. ConclusionResults demonstrate a reduction in motor seizures and a safety profile consistent with previous studies.

Long-term efficacy and safety of cannabidiol in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex: 3-year results from the cannabidiol expanded access program.

The cannabidiol (CBD) Expanded Access Program provided compassionate access to CBD for patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy, including tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), at 35 US epilepsy centers. Here, we present the long-term efficacy and safety outcomes for add-on CBD treatment in patients with TSC. Patients received plant-derived, highly purified CBD (Epidiolex® 100 mg/mL, oral solution), increasing from 2 to 10 mg/kg/d to tolerance or maximum of 25-50 mg/kg/d. Efficacy endpoints were percentage change from baseline in median monthly convulsive, focal, and total seizure frequency and ≥ 50%, ≥75%, and 100% responder rates across 12-week visit windows through 144 weeks. Adverse events (AEs) are reported through 233 weeks. Thirty-four patients with confirmed TSC were included. Mean age was 12.4 years (range, 1.8-31.2), and patients were receiving a median of 3 (range, 1-7) antiseizure medications (ASMs) at baseline. Median CBD dose was 25-28 mg/kg/d for 36 weeks and then 20-50 mg/kg/d through 228 weeks. Dose reduction from baseline occurred for most ASMs, except topiramate. Median reduction in the frequency of convulsive, focal, and total seizures was 44%-81%, 51%-87%, and 44%-87%, respectively, through 144 weeks. Responder rates (≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% reduction) were 43%-71%, 14%-58%, and 0%-25% for convulsive seizures; 52%-75%, 35%-60%, and 7%-32% for focal seizures; and 46%-79%, 26%-65%, and 0%-13% for total seizures. A total of 94% of patients experienced ≥1 AE; 47% had serious AEs, considered treatment unrelated by the investigator. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 71% of patients. The most frequently reported TRAEs were somnolence, diarrhea, and ataxia. Two patients experienced AEs leading to discontinuation. There were no deaths. Long-term add-on CBD use was associated with reduced seizure frequency through 144 weeks. The safety profile was consistent with previous reports. In this study, we evaluated efficacy and safety of cannabidiol (CBD) treatment in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex receiving CBD in addition to other antiseizure treatments in an Expanded Access Program. After starting CBD, 46%-79% of patients had at least 50% reduction and 26%-65% had at least 75% reduction in the number of seizures per month; up to 13% had no seizures through 144 weeks. Safety results were similar to prior studies; sleepiness and diarrhea were common treatment-related side effects. These results show that long-term CBD treatment was associated with fewer seizures and mild/moderate side effects.

Cannabidiol and positive effects on object recognition memory in an in vivo model of Fragile X Syndrome: Obligatory role of hippocampal GPR55 receptors

Cannabidiol (CBD), a non-psychotomimetic constituent of Cannabis sativa, has been recently approved for epileptic syndromes often associated with Autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, the putative efficacy and mechanism of action of CBD in patients suffering from ASD and related comorbidities remain debated, especially because of the complex pharmacology of CBD. We used pharmacological, immunohistochemical and biochemical approaches to investigate the effects and mechanisms of action of CBD in the recently validated Fmr1-Δexon 8 rat model of ASD, that is also a model of Fragile X Syndrome (FXS), the leading monogenic cause of autism. CBD rescued the cognitive deficits displayed by juvenile Fmr1-Δexon 8 animals, without inducing tolerance after repeated administration. Blockade of CA1 hippocampal GPR55 receptors prevented the beneficial effect of both CBD and the fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) inhibitor URB597 in the short-term recognition memory deficits displayed by Fmr1-Δexon 8 rats. Thus, CBD may exert its beneficial effects through CA1 hippocampal GPR55 receptors. Docking analysis further confirmed that the mechanism of action of CBD might involve competition for brain fatty acid binding proteins (FABPs) that deliver anandamide and related bioactive lipids to their catabolic enzyme FAAH. These findings demonstrate that CBD reduced cognitive deficits in a rat model of FXS and provide initial mechanistic insights into its therapeutic potential in neurodevelopmental disorders.

Antihypertensive effects of CBD are mediated by altered inflammatory response: A sub-study of the HYPER-H21-4 trial

Despite the abundance of preclinical data, cardiovascular effects of cannabidiol (CBD) in humans remain controversial. HYPER-H21-4 trial was designed as a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial aimed to explore the effects of chronic CBD dosing on ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and vascular stiffness in hypertensive individuals. In this pre-specified analysis of the trial we aimed to elucidate the anti-inflammatory effects of CBD by measuring the dynamic of serum cytokines. Specifically, interleukin 1β (IL-1β), IL-8, IL-6, IL-10, IL-18, Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and lectin-type oxidized LDL receptor 1 (LOX-1) were measured. A total of 65 patients with primary hypertension were included. After five weeks of oral CBD administration, but not of placebo, serum concentrations of IL-8, IL-10 and IL-18 were significantly lower in comparison to baseline concentrations (p = 0.044, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Serum levels of other cytokines showed no CBD-associated dynamic. Higher IL-8 and IL-10 baseline levels heralded higher diastolic BP reduction (r = -0.478, p < 0.001 and r = -0.265, p = 0.034, respectively), whereas the extent of reduction in IL-8 and IL-10 serum levels correlated with the extent of reduction in diastolic BP (r = 0.434, p < 0.001 and r = 0.594, p < 0.001, respectively). Overall, the results of the present analysis imply that the antihypertensive effects of CBD in patients with primary hypertension are accompanied by changes in serum concentrations of multiple cytokines.

The Use of Cannabidiol in Metabolic Syndrome-An Opportunity to Improve the Patient's Health or Much Ado about Nothing?

Cannabis-derived therapies are gaining popularity in the medical world. More and more perfect forms of cannabinoids are sought, which could be used in the treatment of many common diseases, including metabolic syndrome, whose occurrence is also increasing. The purpose of this review was to investigate the usefulness of cannabinoids, mainly cannabidiol (CBD), in individuals with obesity, impaired glucose and lipid metabolism, high blood pressure, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We summarised the most recent research on the broad topic of cannabis-derived influence on metabolic syndrome components. Since there is a lot of work on the effects of Δ9-THC (Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol) on metabolism and far less on cannabidiol, we felt it needed to be sorted out and summarised in this review. The research results on the use of cannabidiol in obesity are contraindicatory. When it comes to glucose homeostasis, it appears that CBD maintains it, sensitises adipose tissue to insulin, and reduces fasting glucose levels, so it seems to be a potential target in this kind of metabolic disorder, but some research results are inconclusive. CBD shows some promising results in the treatment of various lipid disorders. Some studies have proven its positive effect by decreasing LDL and increasing HDL as well. Despite their probable efficacy, CBD and its derivatives will likely remain an adjunctive treatment rather than a mainstay of therapy. Studies have also shown that CBD in patients with hypertension has positive effects, even though the hypotensive properties of cannabidiol are small. However, CBD can be used to prevent blood pressure surges, stabilise them, and have a protective effect on blood vessels. Results from preclinical studies have shown that the effect of cannabidiol on NAFLD may be potentially beneficial in the treatment of the metabolic syndrome and its components. Nevertheless, there is limited data on CBD and NAFLD in human studies. Because of the numerous confounding factors, the conclusions are unclear, and more research in this field is required.

The effect of cannabidiol on seizure features and quality of life in drug-resistant frontal lobe epilepsy patients: a triple-blind controlled trial.

Treatment-resistant epileptic seizures are associated with reduced quality of life (QoL). As polypharmacy with routine antiseizure medications has many side effects, novel add-on treatments are necessary. Recent research showed the efficacy of add-on therapy by cannabidiol (CBD) on refractory epilepsy. We attempted to extend data on the efficacy and safety profile of CBD in patients with frontal lobe treatment-resistant epilepsy. A total of 27 patients were recruited into two CBD (n = 12) and placebo (n = 15) groups. The CBD group received a highly purified liposomal preparation of the drug in addition to routine antiseizure medications. The placebo group only received antiseizure medications. This experiment followed a triple-blinding protocol. Outcome measures were seizure frequency, the Chalfont seizure severity scale (CSSS), and the quality of life questionnaire score (QOLIE-31) assessed at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks. At 4 weeks, results indicated that a higher fraction of patients in the CBD group (66.67%) showed improvement in seizure, compared to the placebo group (20.00%). Before-after comparison revealed that CBD, unlike routine ADEs, was effective in reducing the occurrence of seizures at the study's final timepoint [mean difference 45.58, 95% CI (8.987 to 82.18), p = 0.009]. Seizure severity was not affected by study groups or time intervals (repeated-measures ANOVA p > 0.05). Post-hoc tests found that the QoLI-31 score was improved at 8 weeks compared to baseline [mean diff. -5.031, 95% CI (-9.729 to -0.3328), p = 0.032]. The difference in cases who experienced enhanced QoL was meaningful between the CBD and placebo groups at 8 weeks [RR: 2.160, 95% CI (1.148 to 4.741), p = 0.018] but not at 4 weeks (p = 0.653). A positive finding for QoL improvement was associated with a positive finding for seizure frequency reduction [r = 0.638, 95% CI (0.296 to 0.835), p = 0.001]. Interestingly, limiting the correlation analysis to cases receiving CBD indicated that QoL improvement was not linked with seizure parameters such as severity and frequency (p > 0.05). The present study suggests the benefit of a purified and highly efficient preparation of CBD for seizure frequency reduction and improvement of QoL in refractory frontal lobe epilepsy. Further study with longer follow-ups and larger sample size is advised. https://www.irct.ir/trial/56790, identifier: IRCT20210608051515N1.

Adverse Events of Cannabidiol Use in Patients With Epilepsy

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurologic disorders globally. Cannabidiol (CBD) has been approved for the treatment of epilepsy, but its use has been associated with several different adverse events (AEs). To investigate the frequency and risk of AEs developing in patients with epilepsy who are using CBD. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant studies published from database inception up to August 4, 2022. The search strategy included a combination of the following keywords: (cannabidiol OR epidiolex) AND (epilepsy OR seizures). The review included all randomized clinical trials that investigated at least 1 AE from the use of CBD in patients with epilepsy. Basic information about each study was extracted. I2 statistics were calculated using Q statistics to assess the statistical heterogeneity among the included studies. A random-effects model was used in cases of substantial heterogeneity, and a fixed-effects model was used if the I2 statistic for the AEs was lower than 40%. This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Frequency of each AE and risk of developing each AE in patients with epilepsy using CBD. Nine studies were included. Overall incidences of 9.7% in the CBD group and 4.0% in the control group were found for any grade AEs. The overall risk ratios (RRs) for any grade and severe grade AEs were 1.12 (95% CI, 1.02-1.23) and 3.39 (95% CI, 1.42-8.09), respectively, for the CBD group compared with the control group. Compared with the control group, the CBD group had a greater risk for incidence of serious AEs (RR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.83-3.88), AEs resulting in discontinuation (RR, 3.95; 95% CI, 1.86-8.37), and AEs resulting in dose reduction (RR, 9.87; 95% CI, 5.34-14.40). Because most of the included studies had some risk of bias (3 raised some concerns and 3 were at high risk of bias), these findings should be interpreted with some caution. In this systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials, the use of CBD to treat patients with epilepsy was associated with an increased risk of several AEs. Additional studies are needed to determine the safe and effective CBD dosage for treating epilepsy.

Cannabidiol use in patients with Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: experts’ opinions using a nominal group technique (NGT) approach

ABSTRACT Background Dravet syndrome (DS) and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) currently present a therapeutic challenge. A pharmaceutical cannabidiol (CBD) specialty (Epidyolex®) has been approved by the FDA and EMA for the treatment of seizures in these syndromes. However, in Italy, the use of galenic formulations versus the pharmaceutical CBD has not been clearly regulated. Aim To share and disseminate expert’ opinions on how to use and administer pharmaceutical CBD in patients with DS and LGS as well as identifying a possible strategy for the switch from galenic to pharmaceutical specialty. Methods A nominal group technique (NGT) was used, involving eight Italian adult and pediatric neurologists. Two questionnaires were consecutively administered and the Clinician’ responses were discussed in a final meeting in order to draw the own conclusions. Results The use of a pharmaceutical CBD is considered preferable to galenic formulations, in terms of reproducibility, safety, and control of the delivered dose. Conclusion The use of a pharmaceutical CBD in DS and LGS patients is useful for both seizure treatment and quality of life (QoL) improvement. However, further studies are needed to confirm the improvement in QoL and the best strategy for switching from a galenic formulation to pharmaceutical CBD.

What's New in Sports Medicine.

What's New in Sports Medicine.

Long-term efficacy and safety of cannabidiol in patients with treatment-resistant epilepsies: Four-year results from the expanded access program.

Cannabidiol (CBD) expanded access program, initiated in 2014, provided add-on CBD to patients with treatment-resistant epilepsies (TREs) at 35 US epilepsy centers. Prior publications reported results through December 2016; herein, we present efficacy and safety results through January 2019. Patients received plant-derived highly purified CBD (Epidiolex®; 100 mg/ml oral solution), increasing from 2 to 10 mg/kg/day to tolerance or maximum 25-50 mg/kg/day dose, depending on the study site. Efficacy endpoints included percentage change from baseline in median monthly convulsive and total seizure frequency and ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% responder rates across 12-week visit windows for up to 192 weeks. Adverse events (AEs) were documented at each visit. Of 892 patients in the safety analysis set, 322 (36%) withdrew; lack of efficacy (19%) and AEs (7%) were the most commonly reported primary reasons for withdrawal. Median (range) age was 11.8 years (range=0-74.5), and patients were taking a median of three (range=0-10) antiseizure medications (ASMs) at baseline; the most common ASMs were clobazam (47%), levetiracetam (34%), and valproate (28%). Median top CBD dose was 25 mg/kg/day; median exposure duration was 694 days. Median percentage reduction from baseline ranged 50%-67% for convulsive seizures and 46%-66% for total seizures. Convulsive seizure responder rates (≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% reduction) ranged 51%-59%, 33%-42%, and 11%-17% of patients across visit windows, respectively. AEs were reported in 88% of patients and serious AEs in 41%; 8% withdrew because of an AE. There were 20 deaths during the study deemed unrelated to treatment by the investigator. The most common AEs (≥20% of patients) were diarrhea (33%), seizure (24%), and somnolence (23%). Add-on CBD was associated with sustained seizure reduction up to 192 weeks with an acceptable safety profile and can be used for long-term treatment of TREs.

Cannabidiol Treatment for Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome at a Single Tertiary Center in South Korea

Purpose: This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of cannabidiol (CBD) as an add-on therapy for childhood-onset Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS).Methods: This retrospective study enrolled patients who visited the Department of Pediatric Neurology at Asan Medical Center from March 2019 to February 2022 and were treated with CBD. Electronic medical records and clinically relevant factors (including the type of epilepsy and seizures, etiology, and the number of concomitantly used anti-epileptic drugs) were reviewed. The outcome was clinical response to CBD (≥50% or &lt;50% seizure reduction at 1, 3, and 6 months after CBD introduction and the last follow-up visit). Relevant adverse events were monitored.Results: Thirty patients were included. The median age of epilepsy onset was 5.5 years (interquartile range [IQR], 3.3 to 25.3), with a median treatment duration of CBD of 6 months (IQR, 3.3 to 7.0). Sixteen patients (53.3%) showed ≥50% seizure reduction at the last follow-up. In a univariate analysis, patients whose epilepsy commenced after 3 years of age were more likely to respond to CBD (odds ratio, 10.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.05 to 97.00; P=0.04). Adverse events were observed in 11 patients (36.6%); the most common adverse event was somnolence. Conclusion: CBD could be a treatment option for children and young adults with drug-resistant LGS with a tolerable safety profile. Age at epilepsy onset (&gt;3 years) was associated with a favorable response to CBD treatment. Further prospective studies with larger populations are needed to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of CBD in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy of various etiologies.

EFFICACY OF CANNABIDIOL IN DRUG RESISTANT EPILEPSY IN A PRIVATE THIRD-LEVEL HOSPITAL

Introduction: In 2016, the rst results of phase III clinical trials showed benecial effects of CBD in treatment-resistant seizure disorders, Objective: To evaluate the efcacy of cannabidiol in patients with drug resistant epilepsy in a private third-level hospital. Methods: Descriptive, retrospective, observational and cross-sectional study. Inclusion criteria were patients under treatment with cannabidiol and drug resistant epilepsy from January 2017 to March 2022. Study variables were age, gender, evolution of epilepsy (years), epileptic syndromes, numbers of antiseizure drugs, reduction of seizures (more tan 50%), cannabidiol dose (mg/kg/day), treatment time (months) and adverse effects. Information was captured in Excel and analyzed in SPSS. Results: 31 patients. The epileptic syndromes found were Lennox Gastaut 32%, West 12.9%, Dravet 3.2%, Doose 3.2% and no syndromic 48.3%. Reduction of seizures more than 50% was shown in 25 patients (80.6%). Seizure free in 5 patients (16%). Cannabidiol dose was: &lt;1 mg/kg/day (9.6%), 1-5 mg/kg/day (77.4%), &gt;5 mg/kg/day (12.9%). Association was found between a decrease in the number of seizures and a higher dose of cannabidiol with statistical signicance (p&lt;0.05). Conclusion: Our study suggests that cannabidiol reduces seizures with few adverse effects in drug resistant epilepsy

The Use of Cannabidiol in Patients With Low Back Pain Caused by Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: An Observational Study.

Background Spinal stenosis is a degenerative narrowing of the spinal canal with encroachment on the neural structures by surrounding bone and soft tissue. This chronic low back condition can cause restrictions in mobility, impairment of daily activities, opioid dependence, anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life. Spinal stenosis can be treated through surgical and nonsurgical methods, but neither has proven consistently reliable. Cannabidiol (CBD) has also been observed to have anxiolytic, anti-inflammatory, antiemetic, and antipsychotic behaviors. CBD may provide greater nonsurgical treatment options for the pain associated with spinal stenosis while minimizing the need for opioids. An observational study was undertaken to assess the effects of CBD on patients suffering from chronic spinal stenosis. Methodology This observational study was investigator-initiated and designed to determine the effect of hemp-derived CBD gel caps for patients with spinal stenosis related to low back pain and leg pain relative to patient outcomes, medication utilization, and quality of life outcome measures. A total of six physician visits would be required where a set of surveys would be filled out each four weeks apart. Results The study population consisted of 48 patients. The patient population's age ranged from 63 to 95 years and was normally distributed, with a mean age of 75 ± 7.13 years. The sex distribution was 33% male and 67% female patients. The pain was broken down between the six visits for each of the following four questions: pain right now, usual pain level during the week, best pain level during the week, and worst pain level during the week. Usual pain levels (p < 0.001) and worst pain levels (p < 0.005) demonstrated statistically significant improvement over time, while pain right now (p > 0.05) and best pain level (p > 0.05) stayed consistent throughout without statistical significance. Conclusions This open-label, prospective, observational study found that treatment with hemp-derived CBD gel caps was associated with significant improvements in pain scores and several quality-of-life measures for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Quantitative electroencephalographic analysis as a potential biomarker of response to treatment with cannabidiol

PurposePharmaceutical grade cannabidiol (CBD) is one of the newest anti-seizure medications for refractory epilepsy, and the effects of CBD on EEG have not been fully described. MethodsPatients enrolled in a CBD expanded access study had EEGs prior to and 12 weeks after initiation of CBD treatment for their refractory epilepsy. In addition to evaluating the clinical EEG reports, a nonbiased quantitative EEG (qEEG) analysis of background EEG was performed to determine whether consistent changes occur in the EEG in response to administration of CBD. ResultsNo significant qualitative changes were seen, nor changes in quantitative markers of EEG amplitude (RMS amplitude, standard deviation of the amplitude, skewness, or kurtosis), frequency (relative delta, theta, or alpha power), Spearman correlation, or coherence between brain regions. However, relative beta power and 1/f slope, a measure of signal noise increased with the addition of CBD. When patients were separated into responders and nonresponders based on seizure reduction with CBD, responders also had decreased Spearman correlation between the frontopolar and occipital regions after addition of CBD, suggesting that responders may have quantitatively improved EEG background organization after CBD initiation. The differences in beta and 1/f slope were also seen more robustly in CBD responders compared with nonresponders after CBD initiation. These differences disappeared when analyzing only patients not taking benzodiazepines, suggesting that the effect of CBD on seizures was related to the ability of the brain to further increase beta in response to CBD in patients already taking benzodiazepines.We noted that even before initiation of CBD, 1/f slope was also significantly different in responders compared to nonresponders. Therefore, to explore the baseline EEG in responders and nonresponders, we utilized a variable selection procedure to identify baseline EEG features that could predict whether a patient’s seizures would improve with CBD. In the optimal multivariable logistic model, baseline coherence, Spearman correlation, and patient sex jointly predicted whether a patient in this cohort would respond to CBD (defined as a seizure reduction of 40% or greater) with 74% accuracy. This model performed less well on a data set of reduced duration and variability, highlighting the importance of real-world testing of any clinically relevant model. ConclusionThese results suggest that there are subtle changes in certain metrics detected by qEEG even at baseline that may not be perceived during qualitative EEG analysis and that could be used in the future as a biomarker to predict a patient’s clinical response to CBD administration. Development of such a predictive EEG biomarker, especially before the initiation of a medication trial, could reduce unnecessary ASM exposure and improve outcomes for patients with epilepsy facing new medication selection.

Buccally Absorbed Cannabidiol Shows Significantly Superior Pain Control and Improved Satisfaction Immediately After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded, Randomized Trial

Background: Despite the widespread use and sales of cannabidiol (CBD) products in the United States, there is a paucity of literature to evaluate its effectiveness, safety, or ideal route of administration for postoperative pain. Purpose: To evaluate the potential analgesic effects of buccally absorbed CBD in patients who have undergone arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: This was a US Food and Drug Administration–sanctioned, multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blinded trial conducted in patients undergoing ARCR. Patients aged from 18 to 75 years undergoing ARCR were prospectively enrolled and randomized to the control and experimental groups. The experimental group received an oral, buccally absorbed tablet containing 25 mg of CBD 3 times a day if <80 kg, or 50 mg of CBD 3 times a day if >80 kg, for 14 days postoperatively, while the control group received an identical placebo. Patients were followed up on days 1, 2, 7, and 14, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain scores, opioid consumption, and satisfaction with pain control were recorded. Additionally, liver function tests were conducted on days 7 and 14 to assess safety, and nausea was monitored. P < .05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: Overall, 100 patients were recruited, with 1 patient being excluded, for a total of 99 patients. There were no significant differences in patient demographics between the 2 groups. On day 1, the VAS pain score was significantly lower in the CBD group than in the control group (4.4 ± 3.1 vs 5.7 ± 3.2, respectively; P = .04), although this difference was no longer present on day 2 (4.7 ± 2.8 vs 5.3 ± 2.6, respectively; P = .32). On both days 1 and 2, patient satisfaction with pain control was significantly higher in the CBD group than in the control group (day 1: 7.0 ± 3.0 vs 5.6 ± 3.7, respectively [P = .04]; day 2: 7.3 ± 2.5 vs 6.0 ± 3.3, respectively [P = .03]). The quantity of opioids consumed was low in both groups, and there were no statistically significant differences in opioid consumption (P > .05). On days 7 and 14, there were no statistically significant differences in VAS scores, opioid consumption, or patient satisfaction with pain control between the CBD and control groups (P > .05 for all). There were no significant differences in liver function test results postoperatively (P > .05). Conclusion: Buccally absorbed CBD demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and showed significant promise in the reduction of pain in the immediate perioperative period after ARCR compared with the control. Further studies are currently ongoing to confirm dosing and effectiveness in other orthopaedic conditions. Registration: NCT04672252 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Cannabidiol for Functional Dyspepsia With Normal Gastric Emptying: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Cannabidiol (CBD), a CBR2 agonist with limited psychic effects, antagonizes CB1/CB2 receptors. Allelic variation CNR1 (gene for CBR1) rs806378 and FAAH rs324420 were associated with altered gut motility and sensation. This study aimed to compare the pharmacodynamics and clinical effects of a 4-week treatment with pharmaceutical-grade CBD vs placebo and assess the interactions of FAAH and CNR1 gene variants on the effects of CBD in patients with functional dyspepsia (FD). We performed a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled (1:1 ratio) study of CBD b.i.d. (20 mg/kg/d according to the US Food and Drug Administration escalation guidance) in FD patients with nondelayed gastric emptying (GE) at baseline. Symptoms were assessed by validated daily symptom diary (0-4 scale for upper abdominal pain, nausea, and bloating), weekly assessment of adequate relief, Leuven Postprandial Distress Scale (8 symptoms, adjectival scores rated 0-4 for severity), and quality of life (Short-Form Nepean Dyspepsia Index [average of 10 dimensions each on a 5-point scale]). After the 4-week treatment, all patients underwent measurements of GE of solids, gastric volumes, and Ensure nutrient satiation test. Statistical analysis compared 2 treatments for all endpoints and the effects of CBD in association with FAAH rs324420 and CNR1 rs806378. CBD and placebo effects on physiological functions and patient response outcomes were not significantly different. There were borderline CBD treatment-by-genotype interactions: rs806378 CNR1 with Leuven Postprandial Distress Scale ( P = 0.06) and GE solids ( P = 0.12). Approved doses of CBD used off-label do not relieve FD with normal baseline GE of solids or alter gastric motor functions and satiation. CBD treatment-by-gene interactions suggest potential benefits for postprandial distress with CNR1 rs806378 T allele.

Cannabidiol Increases Seizure Resistance and Improves Behavior in an Scn8a Mouse Model.

Voltage-gated sodium channel genes are an important family of human epilepsy genes. De novo missense mutations in SCN8A (encoding Nav1.6) are associated with a spectrum of clinical presentation, including multiple seizure types, movement disorders, intellectual disability, and behavioral abnormalities such as autism. Patients with SCN8A mutations are often treated with multiple antiepileptic drugs, the most common being sodium channel blockers. Cannabidiol (CBD) has been included as a component of treatment regimens for some SCN8A patients; however, to date, there are no clinical trials that have evaluated the therapeutic potential of CBD in patients with SCN8A mutations. In the current manuscript, we demonstrated a dose-dependent increase in seizure resistance following CBD treatment in mice expressing the human SCN8A mutation R1620L (RL/+). We also found that CBD treatment improved social behavior and reduced hyperactivity in the RL/+ mutants. Our findings suggest that CBD may be beneficial in patients with SCN8A-associated disease.

Acceptability of cannabidiol in patients with psychosis.

Background:Cannabidiol (CBD) is a promising novel candidate treatment for psychosis. It has a more benign side effect profile than antipsychotic medications, and being treated with CBD is not perceived as being stigmatising. These observations suggest that patients with psychosis would find CBD to be a relatively acceptable treatment.Objective:This study tested the above hypothesis by assessing the views of a sample of patients.Methods:Patients with a psychotic disorder were invited to complete a survey exploring their expectations about the efficacy and side effects of CBD.Results:Seventy patients completed the survey. The majority (86%) were willing to try CBD as a treatment. Most patients believed that CBD would improve their psychotic symptoms (69%) and that it would have fewer side effects than their current medication (64%; mainly antipsychotics). A minority of patients (10%) were concerned that CBD might exacerbate their psychotic symptoms. This, however, appeared to reflect confusion between the effects of CBD and those of cannabis.Conclusion:Most patients with psychosis regard CBD as an acceptable treatment. Although CBD has not yet been approved as a treatment for psychosis, many patients are aware of it through the presence of CBD in cannabis and in health supplements. When added to the emerging evidence of its efficacy and the low risk of side effects, the high acceptability of CBD underlines its therapeutic potential.

Understanding the Potential Benefits of Cannabidiol for Patients With Schizophrenia: A Narrative Review.

Research suggests that cannabis-derived delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol can be linked to the worsening of psychosis and/or other symptoms of schizophrenia. However, studies have shown that another major cannabinoid found in cannabis, cannabidiol (CBD), may be a potential alternative or adjunctive treatment for psychosis and schizophrenia. As such, herein we review the relevant literature relating to the safety and efficacy of CBD treatment in patients with schizophrenia, including the effects of CBD in treating the positive, negative, and cognitive symptoms of the disorder, as well as the molecular mechanisms by which CBD can reduce schizophrenic symptoms. The potential utility of CBD for mitigating cannabis cravings and cannabis withdrawal in this patient population will also be reviewed. Lastly, the dosing, method of drug delivery, length of treatment, and adverse effects of CBD in patients with schizophrenia are discussed. Thus, the goal of this narrative review is to help clinicians and researchers better understand the risks and benefits of this potential therapy for this patient population.

Add-on cannabidiol in patients with Dravet syndrome: Results of a long-term open-label extension trial.

Add-on cannabidiol (CBD) reduced seizures associated with Dravet syndrome (DS) in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials: GWPCARE1Part B (NCT02091375) and GWPCARE2 (NCT02224703). Patients who completed GWPCARE1Part A (NCT02091206) or Part B, or GWPCARE2, were enrolled in a long-term open-label extension trial, GWPCARE5 (NCT02224573). We present an interim analysis of the safety, efficacy, and patient-reported outcomes from GWPCARE5. Patients received a pharmaceutical formulation of highly purified CBD in oral solution (100mg/ml), titrated from 2.5 to 20mg/kg/day over a 2-week period, added to their existing medications. Based on response and tolerance, CBD could be reduced or increased to 30mg/kg/day. Of the 330 patients who completed the original randomized trials, 315 (95%) enrolled in this open-label extension. Median treatment duration was 444days (range = 18-1535), with a mean modal dose of 22mg/kg/day; patients received a median of threeconcomitant antiseizure medications. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 97% patients (mild, 23%; moderate, 50%; severe, 25%). Commonly reported AEs were diarrhea (43%), pyrexia (39%), decreased appetite (31%), and somnolence (28%). Twenty-eight (9%) patients discontinued due to AEs. Sixty-nine (22%) patients had liver transaminase elevations >3× upper limit of normal; 84% were on concomitant valproic acid. In patients from GWPCARE1Part B and GWPCARE2, the median reduction from baseline in monthly seizure frequency assessed in 12-week periods up to Week 156 was 45%-74% for convulsive seizures and 49%-84% for total seizures. Across all visit windows, ≥83% patients/caregivers completing a Subject/Caregiver Global Impression of Change scale reported improvement in overall condition. We show that long-term CBD treatment had an acceptable safety profile and led to sustained, clinically meaningful reductions in seizure frequency in patients with treatment-resistant DS.