Candidemia In Non-neutropenic Patients Research Articles

Clinical characteristics and prognostic risk factors of candidemia in non-neutropenic patients: a retrospective cohort study.

This study aimed to determine the clinical characteristics and the prognostic risk factors in non-neutropenic patients with candidemia. Data were retrospectively collected through the medical record information system. Non-neutropenic patients with candidemia were relatively aged, with a more than one-third rate of in-hospitalization mortality. In multivariate analysis, APACHE II score (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.138; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.067-1.213), septic shock (aOR, 5.704; 95% CI, 2.639-12.326) and RRT (aOR, 16.152; 95% CI, 2.628-99.275) (all P < 0.01) were independent related with non-survivors. In conclusion, non-neutropenic patients with candidemia have a high in-hospitalization mortality, and APACHE II, septic shock, and RRT are independently factors.

Multifaceted Evaluation of Antibiotic Therapy as a Factor Associated with Candidemia in Non-Neutropenic Patients.

We aimed to evaluate various aspects of antibiotic therapy as factors associated with candidemia in non-neutropenic patients. A retrospective, matched, case-control study was conducted in two teaching hospitals. Patients with candidemia (cases) were compared to patients without candidemia (controls), matched by age, intensive care unit admission, duration of hospitalization, and type of surgery. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with candidemia. A total of 246 patients were included in the study. Of 123 candidemia patients, 36% had catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). Independent factors in the whole population included immunosuppression (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.195; p = 0.036), total parenteral nutrition (aOR = 3.642; p < 0.001), and anti-methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) therapy for ≥11 days (aOR = 5.151; p = 0.004). The antibiotic factor in the non-CRBSI population was anti-pseudomonal beta-lactam treatment duration of ≥3 days (aOR = 5.260; p = 0.008). The antibiotic factors in the CRBSI population included anti-MRSA therapy for ≥11 days (aOR = 10.031; p = 0.019). Antimicrobial stewardship that reduces exposure to these antibacterial spectra could help prevent the development of candidemia.

Assessment of risk factors for candidemia in non-neutropenic patients hospitalized in Internal Medicine wards: A multicenter study

BackgroundAn increasing prevalence of candidemia has been reported in Internal Medicine wards (IMWs). The aim of our study was to identify risk factors for candidemia among non-neutropenic patients hospitalized in IMWs. MethodsA multicenter case–control study was performed in three hospitals in Italy. Patients developing candidemia (cases) were compared to patients without candidemia (controls) matched by age, time of admission and duration of hospitalization. A logistic regression analysis identified risk factors for candidemia, and a new risk score was developed. Validation was performed on an external cohort of patients. ResultsOverall, 951 patients (317 cases of candidemia and 634 controls) were included in the derivation cohort, while 270 patients (90 patients with candidemia and 180 controls) constituted the validation cohort. Severe sepsis or septic shock, recent Clostridium difficile infection, diabetes mellitus, total parenteral nutrition, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, concomitant intravenous glycopeptide therapy, presence of peripherally inserted central catheter, previous antibiotic therapy and immunosuppressive therapy were factors independently associated with candidemia. The new risk score showed good area under the curve (AUC) values in both derivation (AUC 0.973 95% CI 0.809–0.997, p<0.001) and validation cohort (0.867 95% CI 0.710–0.931, p<0.001). A threshold of 3 leads to a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 83%. ConclusionNon-neutropenic patients admitted in IMWs have peculiar risk factors for candidemia. A new risk score with a good performance could facilitate the identification of candidates to early antifungal therapy.

Treatment of candidemia in adult patients without neutropenia - an inconvenient truth

In 2009 the Infectious Diseases Society of America reviewed the guidelines on the treatment of candidemia in non-neutropenic patients. In this document the preferred treatment was either fluconazole or an echinocandin. Amphotericin-B formulations were considered an alternative. However, careful assessment of published data showed similar efficacy between these drugs.

Epidemiology and risk factors for non-Candida albicanscandidemia in non-neutropenic patients at a Chinese teaching hospital

The purpose of this study was to describe the epidemiology of nosocomial candidemia and identify risk factors involved in infections caused by non-C. albicans Candida species in a Chinese tertiary care center over a 10-year period. A total of 102 cases of nosocomial candidemia in non-neutropenic patients admitted from 1998 through 2007 were included in the study. Candida albicans remained the most common causative agent, accounting for 57.8% of all cases, followed by C. tropicalis (12.8%), C. parapsilosis (10.8%) and C. glabrata (10.8%). Comparison of C. albicans and non-C. albicans candidemia by multivariate logistic regression showed that factors independently associated with non-C. albicans candidemia included head trauma (OR, 5.34; 95% CI, 1.18-24.17; P = 0.029) and bacterial sepsis (OR, 3.58; 95% CI, 1.17-10.98; P = 0.026). Factors independently associated with C. albicans candidemia included tracheal intubation (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.08-0.92; P = 0.037), and increased peripheral WBC count (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.95; P = 0.006).

Traitements antifongiques des candidémies chez les patients non neutropéniques : évaluation des pratiques en réanimation

Objective The authors had for objective to assess systemic antifungal treatment for candidemia in non-neutropenic patients, in intensive care units (ICU), and compare the results with French 2004 recommendations. Study design A retrospective multicenter study (nine ICU in two teaching hospitals) was made. Patients and method Thirty-eight non-neutropenic patients with at least one positive blood culture for Candida who had received systemic antifungal treatment were included between May 2004 and September 2007. Results Thirty-nine cases of candidemia were analyzed. The median age was 54.5 (21–80), the median SAPS II score at admission was 44 (20–79), the median duration of stay in ICU was 22.5 days (2–82), and the death rate was 45%. Candida albicans was identified in 69% of the cases. Eight percent of Candida sp. isolates were resistant or susceptible dose-dependent (S-DD) to fluconazole. Before identification, fluconazole, caspofungin, voriconazole, and amphotericin B were used in 74%, 15%, 5%, and 5% of cases respectively. After identification and antifungal susceptibility determination, fluconazole was used in 68% of cases, caspofungin in 24% of cases, any formulation of amphotericin B in 6% of cases, voriconazole in 3% of cases. The French recommendations were applied in 71% of cases before identification and in 68% of cases after identification and antifungal susceptibility determination. Conclusion The main causes of non-compliance to recommendations were the use of fluconazole in patients previously exposed to azole agents, the use of caspofungin in hemodynamically unstable patients, and the absence of therapeutic desescalade.

Economic considerations in the treatment of invasive aspergillosis: a review of voriconazole pharmacoeconomic studies

Invasive aspergillosis is a life-threatening fungal infection predominately affecting immunocompromised individuals. The incidence of inpatient-treated aspergillosis cases in the US is estimated to be between 3.02 and 3.80 per 10,000 hospitalized patients. The estimated difference in hospital costs of patients with an aspergillosis infection is US$36,867 to US$59,356 higher than those of patients without the infection. Voriconazole is a synthetic, broad spectrum triazole antifungal agent, with FDA-approved indications for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis, esophageal candidiasis, candidemia in nonneutropenic patients, invasive candidiasis, and infections due to Scedosporium apiospermum and Fusarium species in patients refractory to or intolerant of other therapy. Eight cost-effectiveness analyses, one cost-minimization analysis, and one cost analysis were identified from a Medline search. The 10 pharmacoeconomic analyses were conducted in six different countries comparing voriconazole to conventional amphotericin B, liposomal amphotericin B, itraconazole, and caspofungin. All the cost-effectiveness and cost-minimization analyses identified voriconazole as the most cost-effective therapy. The cost analysis demonstrated voriconazole cost-savings. While the acquisition costs of voriconazole are higher than those of conventional amphotericin B, the toxicity profile and rate of treatment success associated with voriconazole result in lower total treatment costs per successfully treated patient.

EUCAST Technical Note on voriconazole

EUCAST Technical Note on voriconazole

Voriconazole

Voriconazole (VFEND), a synthetic second-generation, broad-spectrum triazole derivative of fluconazole, inhibits the cytochrome P450 (CYP)-dependent enzyme 14-alpha-sterol demethylase, thereby disrupting the cell membrane and halting fungal growth. In the US, intravenous and/or oral voriconazole is recommended in adults for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis, candidaemia in non-neutropenic patients, disseminated infections caused by Candida spp., oesophageal candidiasis, and in patients with scedosporiosis and fusariosis who are refractory to or intolerant of other antifungal therapy. In Europe, intravenous and/or oral voriconazole is recommended in adults and paediatric patients of at least 2 years of age for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis, candidaemia in non-neutropenic patients, fluconazole-resistant serious invasive Candida spp. infections, scedosporiosis and fusariosis. In large randomised trials, voriconazole was an effective and generally well tolerated primary treatment for candidiasis and invasive aspergillosis in adults and adolescents. More limited data also support the use of voriconazole for the treatment of invasive fungal infections in children, in those with rare fungal infections, such as Fusarium spp. or Scedosporium spp., and in those refractory to or intolerant of other standard antifungal therapies. The availability of both parenteral and oral formulations and the almost complete absorption of the drug after oral administration provide for ease of use and potential cost savings, and ensure that therapeutic plasma concentrations are maintained when switching from intravenous to oral therapy. On the other hand, the numerous drug interactions associated with voriconazole may limit its usefulness in some patients. Further clinical experience will help to more fully determine the position of voriconazole in relation to other licensed antifungal agents. In the meantime, voriconazole is a valuable emerging option for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis and rare fungal infections, including Fusarium spp. and Scedosporium spp. infections, and provides an alternative option for the treatment of candidiasis, particularly where the causative organism is inherently resistant to other licensed antifungal agents.

Voriconazole versus a regimen of amphotericin B followed by fluconazole for candidaemia in non-neutropenic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial

Voriconazole versus a regimen of amphotericin B followed by fluconazole for candidaemia in non-neutropenic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial

Voriconazole in the management of nosocomial invasive fungal infections

Voriconazole is a new triazole developed for the treatment of life-threatening fungal infections. The drug is available for both oral and intravenous administration; the oral formulation has excellent bioavailability. The side-effect profile of voriconazole presents an acceptable safety and tolerability spectrum: transient visual disturbances, liver enzyme abnormalities, and skin rashes are the most frequently reported side effects but rarely lead to discontinuation. The potential for drug-drug interactions is high, because of its extensive hepatic metabolism. Careful attention to dosage is required, and serum levels and the effects of interacting drugs should be monitored. Review of 25 470 isolates of yeasts and 3216 isolates of filamentous fungi showed voriconazole to have broad-spectrum activity against pathogenic yeasts including intrinsically fluconazole-resistant isolates such as Candida krusei, dimorphic fungi, and opportunistic moulds like Aspergillus spp, amphotericin-B-resistant Aspergillus terreus, Fusarium spp, and Scedosporium apiospermum. It displays excellent clinical efficacy in patients with fluconazole-resistant and -susceptible Candida infections, invasive bone and central nervous system aspergillosis, and various refractory fungal infections. Voriconazole has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and by the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis, serious infections caused by Fusarium and S. apiospermum, fluconazole-resistant invasive Candida infections, and candidemia in nonneutropenic patients.

Triazole Cross-Resistance among Candida spp.: Case Report, Occurrence among Bloodstream Isolates, and Implications for Antifungal Therapy

Candida spp. are common causes of bloodstream infections among hospitalized patients. Fluconazole (FLC) remains a first-line therapy for candidemia; and voriconazole (VRC), an expanded-spectrum triazole, was recently approved for the treatment of candidemia in nonneutropenic patients. In vitro studies have suggested that VRC has potent activity against Candida spp. with reduced susceptibilities to FLC. We present a case report of invasive candidiasis and candidemia due to a Candida glabrata isolate that developed resistance to all currently available triazole antifungals after a course of FLC treatment. This case prompted us to determine the frequency of cross-resistance among bloodstream Candida isolates collected during a recent 12-month period at a large, academic medical center. FLC MICs were determined for 125 of 153 isolates (81.7%). Thirty of 125 isolates (24%) were resistant or showed reduced susceptibilites to FLC (MICs >/= 16 microg/ml). When 28 of these 30 isolates were tested for their VRC susceptibilities, 9 (32%) had MICs that were >/=2 microg/ml. Five of these nine isolates were C. glabrata, two isolates were Candida tropicalis, one isolate was Candida albicans, and one isolate was Candida parapsilosis. All five Candida krusei isolates tested had VRC MICs </=0.5 microg/ml. These data have prompted the introduction of reflexive FLC susceptibility testing of first bloodstream Candida isolates at our institution. The case report and our data also suggest that VRC should be avoided as initial therapy in unstable patients with invasive candidiasis, particularly in the setting of prior azole exposure. Studies are needed to define the clinical significance of in vitro resistance to the newer antifungal agents.

Voriconazole Versus a Regimen of Amphotericin B Followed by Fluconazole for Candidaemia in Nonneutropenic Patients: A Randomised Noninferiority Trial

Voriconazole Versus a Regimen of Amphotericin B Followed by Fluconazole for Candidaemia in Nonneutropenic Patients: A Randomised Noninferiority Trial

Secular trends in nosocomial candidaemia in non-neutropenic patients in an Italian tertiary hospital

A retrospective study was performed in an Italian tertiary hospital to evaluate trends in candidaemia between 1992 and 2001, and to compare the characteristics of episodes of fungaemia between 1992--1997 and 1998--2001. In total, 370 episodes of candidaemia were identified, with an average incidence of 0.99 episodes/10 000 patient-days/year (range 0.49--1.29 episodes). On an annual trend basis, the overall incidence was essentially stable in surgical and medical wards, but decreased in intensive care units (ICUs) (p 0.0065). The average use of fluconazole was 37.9 g/10 000 patient-days/year (range 21.4--56.1 g), and did not change significantly during the 10-year period. Nearly two-thirds of patients were in ICUs at the onset of candidaemia, but none was neutropenic in either study period. Candida albicans remained the predominant species isolated (53.8% vs. 48.1%), followed by Candida parapsilosis, Candida glabrata and Candida tropicalis, the distribution of which did not change significantly. The 30-day crude mortality rate was essentially similar (44% vs. 35%) in both study periods. Thus the incidence of nosocomial candidaemia, although high in this institution, decreased among critically-ill patients during the 10-year period. This finding seemed to be related to an improvement in infection control practices, particularly regarding the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections in ICUs. Although the overall use of fluconazole was considerable, no increase in azole-resistant non-albicans Candida spp. was detected.

Voriconazole versus a regimen of amphotericin B followed by fluconazole for candidaemia in non-neutropenic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial

Voriconazole has proven efficacy against invasive aspergillosis and oesophageal candidiasis. This multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority study compared voriconazole with a regimen of amphotericin B followed by fluconazole for the treatment of candidaemia in non-neutropenic patients. Non-neutropenic patients with a positive blood culture for a species of candida and clinical evidence of infection were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, either voriconazole (n=283) or amphotericin B followed by fluconazole (n=139). The primary efficacy analysis was based on clinical and mycological response 12 weeks after the end of treatment, assessed by an independent data-review committee unaware of treatment assignment. Of 422 patients randomised, 370 were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. Voriconazole was non-inferior to amphotericin B/fluconazole in the primary efficacy analysis, with successful outcomes in 41% of patients in both treatment groups (95% CI for difference -10.6% to 10.6%). At the last evaluable assessment, outcome was successful in 162 (65%) patients assigned voriconazole and 87 (71%) assigned amphotericin B/fluconazole (p=0.25). Voriconazole cleared blood cultures as quickly as amphotericin B/fluconazole (median time to negative blood culture, 2.0 days). Treatment discontinuations due to all-cause adverse events were more frequent in the voriconazole group, although most discontinuations were due to non-drug-related events and there were significantly fewer serious adverse events and cases of renal toxicity than in the amphotericin B/fluconazole group. Voriconazole was as effective as the regimen of amphotericin B followed by fluconazole in the treatment of candidaemia in non-neutropenic patients, and with fewer toxic effects. There are several options for treatment of candidaemia in non-neutropenic patients, including amphotericin B, fluconazole, voriconazole, and echinocandins. Voriconazole can be given both as initial intravenous treatment and as an oral stepdown agent.

Itraconazole IV solution in the treatment of candidemia in non-neutropenic patients

Itraconazole IV solution in the treatment of candidemia in non-neutropenic patients

Les candidémies chez le sujet âgé :à propos de quatre cas

Introduction. – Candidemia, principally affecting neutropenic patients in departments of onco-haematology and frail patients in intensive care units, can also be observed in frail elderly people in geriatrics. Exegesis. – Authors report four observations of candidemia diagnosed in elderly dependant patients having several different diseases. Clinical sign was a persistent or recurrent fever after a wide-spectrum antibiotic therapy. Patients were treated by fluconazole leading to negative blood cultures in several days. Three out of four patients died within the weeks following antifungal therapy due to severity of associated diseases. Conclusion. – These observations show that a diagnosis of candidemia should be made when a persistent fever is observed in a frail elderly person. Fluconazole, as efficient as amphotericin B and well tolerated by elderly people, should be the first treatment of candidemia in non-neutropenic patients.

Nosocomial candidemia in non-neutropenic patients at an Italian tertiary care hospital.

In a retrospective study conducted in an Italian tertiary care hospital, the incidence of nosocomial candidemia was evaluated together with causative pathogens, treatment, and risk factors for death. Over a 6-year period (1992-1997), a total of 189 episodes of candidemia occurred in 189 patients (mean age 58+/-19 years), accounting for an average incidence of 1.14 episodes per 10,000 patient-days per year. The most common reasons for hospitalization were solid neoplasia (21%), trauma (17%), abdominal diseases requiring surgery (13%), and cardiovascular diseases (13%). No patient was neutropenic within 3 weeks prior to the onset of candidemia. One hundred thirty patients were hospitalized in intensive care units, 47 patients in surgical wards, and 12 patients in medical wards. Candida albicans was the most frequently isolated pathogen, accounting for 54% of fungal isolates, followed by Candida parapsilosis (23%), Candida glabrata (7%), Candida tropicalis (5%), Candida pelliculosa (4%), Candida lusitaniae (1%), Candida humicula (1%), and other non-albicans Candida spp. (5%). Seventy-six (41%) patients received adequate antifungal therapy. Seventy-one (58%) of the 123 evaluable patients with central venous catheters underwent line removal; 51 of them had catheter-related candidemia. The 30-day crude mortality rate was 45%. Older age, hospitalization in an intensive care unit, a longer duration of candidemia, retention of central lines, and inadequate antifungal therapy were significantly associated with poor outcome. In the present study, nosocomial candidemia was a frequent and relatively underestimated illness. Adequate antifungal therapy and central line removal independently reduced the high mortality of the disease.

Therapeutic Approach to Candida Sepsis.

Serious infections due to Candida species are an emerging nosocomial problem. Therapy for culture-proven candidemia in nonneutropenic patients has been studied extensively, and these studies suggest that fluconazole and conventional amphotericin B are equivalent treatments under most circumstances. Empiric antifungal therapy for the seriously ill, febrile, nonneutropenic intensive care unit patient has been less well studied, but an understanding of the important risk factors for invasive candidiasis can help guide rational therapeutic choices. The important role of empiric antifungal therapy in the persistently febrile neutropenic host has been well established. The role of the lipid formulations of amphotericin B in the treatment of candidiasis remains unclear, but these compounds should be considered in any patient requiring amphotericin B with significant renal dysfunction. The trend towards nonalbicans Candida species as a cause of invasive candidiasis, together with an improved understanding of antifungal susceptibility data, should help clinicians and investigators devise new and better approaches to the treatment of this important nosocomial infection.

Intravascular Catheter Exchange and Duration of Candidemia

During a comparative trial of amphotericin B vs. fluconazole for treatment of candidemia in nonneutropenic patients, data on the management of intravascular catheters were collected. Complete records were available for 91% of the 206 study patients. For the subset of patients with a catheter in place at the time of their first positive blood culture, removal and replacement of all intravascular catheters without exchange over a guidewire from a preexisting line on or before the first day the study drug was administered were associated with a reduction in the subsequent mean duration (+/- SE) of candidemia, from 5.6 +/ -0.8 days to 2.6 +/- 0.5 days (P < .001).