Candidates For Cochlear Implantation Research Articles

Early cochlear implantation: exploring electrophysiological thresholds and their role in pre-behavioural recommendations.

Studies investigating the relationship between initial electrophysiological thresholds and subsequent behavioural hearing thresholds have demonstrated uncertainty as to whether initial results can provide an accurate estimation of an infant's functional hearing. This estimation must be accurate if a cochlear implant (CI) is to be considered before behavioural audiometry.This study aims to explore the variance between initial electrophysiological thresholds and subsequent behavioural hearing thresholds in infants to determine under which conditions electrophysiological results can be used to support a CI recommendation before behavioural audiology. This is a prospective cohort study of 63 infants with suspected severe to profound hearing loss, referred to the Cochlear Implant Clinic, Melbourne, before 12 months of age. The assessment protocol includes auditory brainstem response, auditory steady state response, tympanometry, and behavioural audiometry. For most infants undergoing CI candidacy evaluation, initial electrophysiological thresholds are an accurate reflection of their subsequent behavioural thresholds. An alternative CI candidacy pathway is recommended for infants who show profound sensorineural hearing loss on initial electrophysiological testing, in the absence of middle ear effusion, prematurity, or auditory neuropathy features, to provide CI recommendations before behavioural thresholds are obtained. This would lead to reduced delay to implantation and improved oral language outcomes.

Clinical Outcomes for Adult Single-Sided Deafness Cochlear Implantees Exceeding the 5% Candidacy Criterion

Objectives: While single-sided deafness cochlear implants (SSD-CIs) have now received regulatory approval in the United States, candidate-ear candidacy criteria (no better than 5% word-recognition score) are stricter than for traditional CI candidates (50 to 60% speech recognition, best-aided condition). SSD implantation in our center began before regulatory approval, using a criterion derived from traditional candidacy: 50% consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) word-identification score in the candidate ear. A retrospective analysis investigated whether SSD patients exceeding the 5% CNC criterion nevertheless benefitted from a CI as assessed by spatial-hearing tests (speech understanding in noise [SIN] and localization) and by a patient-reported outcome measure quality-of-life instrument validated for patients with CIs. Design: A retrospective chart review assessed the clinical experience of a single CI center. Subjects consisted of 27 adult CI recipients with SSD (N = 21) or asymmetric hearing loss (AHL; N = 6) implanted since September 2019 with at least 3 months of postoperative follow-up. Patients with revision surgery or simultaneous labyrinthectomy and CI surgery were excluded from the sample. Subjects were divided into 2 groups based on preoperative CNC scores measured under best-aided conditions with a behind-the-ear hearing aid in the sound field at 0.9 m from a front loudspeaker, and the better ear masked using an insert earphone with 45 dB HL speech-weighted noise. The “MEETS” group had preoperative CNC word scores <5%; the “EXCEEDS” group had scores >5%. The clinical protocol also included intelligibility tests using AzBio sentences in the same test conditions as CNC; binaural spatial testing (broadband-noise sound localization, and matrix-sentence speech-reception thresholds in spatially separated noise) using a custom-built 7-speaker array; and the CI Quality of Life (CIQOL) instrument. To evaluate CI benefit, preoperative unaided performance was compared with postoperative binaural (acoustic ear + CI ear) performance at a clinic visit closest to 6 months postsurgery. Results: Of 27 SSD-CI recipients, 11 subjects exceeded the 5% preoperative CNC candidacy criterion. Both the MEETS and EXCEEDS groups improved significantly on all 5 primary study outcome measures (CI-alone CNC and AzBio, binaural SIN and sound localization, and CIQOL). The only statistically significant differences observed between the MEETS and EXCEEDS groups were that preoperative CNC and AzBio scores were significantly higher for the EXCEEDS group, as expected given that the groups were defined based on preoperative speech-perception scores in quiet. There were no statistically significant differences between the MEETS and EXCEEDS groups in postoperative scores in any test or in the magnitude of the improvement from preoperative to postoperative assessment. Conclusions: SSD- and AHL-CI recipients exceeding the 5% CNC preoperative candidacy criterion significantly improved in CI-alone speech perception, spatial hearing, and subjectively reported CIQOL outcomes and the observed benefits were indistinguishable from SSD- and AHL-CI recipients who met the 5% criterion. A less-restrictive SSD-CI and AHL-CI candidacy criterion should be considered, and larger-scale clinical trials to evaluate CI efficacy using a less-stringent candidate-ear criterion are warranted.

Patient-related outcome measures (PROM) in adult cochlear implant patients

Cochlear implants (CI) provide individuals with severe sensorineural hearing loss the opportunity for artificial auditory perception. The standardized documentation of speech intelligibility tests is widespread, while the systematic capture of patient-related outcome measures (PROMs) remains inconsistent. Relevant PROM instruments were evaluated and selected based on the criteria of dissemination, clarity, and relevance, integrated into routine clinical practice, and tested at longitudinal time points. A total of three PROM instruments were selected and successfully integrated into the clinical routine. The comparison of 2measurement points from 25individuals showed improvements in subjective speech comprehension and tinnitus perception. This study demonstrates the clinical implementation and integration of PROMs in adult CI candidates and patients. The PROMs are apromising tool to support various phases of treatment, both as adecision aid for potential CI candidates and for monitoring after implantation.

Correlation of Electrophysiological and Behavioral Response in Cochlear Implant Candidates

Correlation of Electrophysiological and Behavioral Response in Cochlear Implant Candidates

Simultaneous cochlear implantation with early endoscopic surgery in small acoustic neuroma.

The exclusive endoscopic transcanal transpromontorial approach (EETTA) has recently been developed for the removal of small-sized acoustic neuromas in the labyrinth (intralabyrinthine schwannoma [ILS]) or internal auditory canal (IAC). Although small tumors that meet the indications for EETTA are also good candidates for cochlear implantation (CI), there are few reports on CI after schwannoma removal using EETTA. Here we present an outcome of patients who underwent simultaneous EETTA and CI. Five patients (two with IAC fundus tumors and three with ILS) who underwent simultaneous EETTA and CI between 2020 and 2022 were retrospectively enrolled. Their medical charts and test results were reviewed. After at least 12 months of follow-up, there were no severe surgical complications such as meningitis, infection, or skin necrosis. Four of the five patients responded to auditory stimulation. Three out of four auditory-responsive patients scored >80% on sentence recognition. Simultaneous EETTA and CI are feasible for the treatment of ILS and IAC fundus tumors. Preservation of the cochlear nerve and modiolus is important for favorable CI outcomes. Therefore, ILS and IAC fundus tumors in patients with nonserviceable hearing should be surgically removed as early as possible to enable proper hearing rehabilitation with CI. Level 4.

Intra-operative test electrode and electrical auditory brainstem response prior to cochlear implantation in CHARGE syndrome

Assessing auditory nerve excitability is crucial in determining candidacy for Cochlear Implantation (CI). Pre-operative tests, such as Electrical Auditory Brainstem Response (EABR), are utilized to evaluate the function of the auditory pathway.

Resting-State Functional Connectivity Predicts Cochlear-Implant Speech Outcomes.

Cochlear implants (CIs) have revolutionized hearing restoration for individuals with severe or profound hearing loss. However, a substantial and unexplained variability persists in CI outcomes, even when considering subject-specific factors such as age and the duration of deafness. In a pioneering study, we use resting-state functional near-infrared spectroscopy to predict speech-understanding outcomes before and after CI implantation. Our hypothesis centers on resting-state functional connectivity (FC) reflecting brain plasticity post-hearing loss and implantation, specifically targeting the average clustering coefficient in resting FC networks to capture variation among CI users. Twenty-three CI candidates participated in this study. Resting-state functional near-infrared spectroscopy data were collected preimplantation and at 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year postimplantation. Speech understanding performance was assessed using consonant-nucleus-consonant words in quiet and Bamford-Kowal-Bench sentences in noise 1-year postimplantation. Resting-state FC networks were constructed using regularized partial correlation, and the average clustering coefficient was measured in the signed weighted networks as a predictive measure for implantation outcomes. Our findings demonstrate a significant correlation between the average clustering coefficient in resting-state functional networks and speech understanding outcomes, both pre- and postimplantation. This approach uses an easily deployable resting-state functional brain imaging metric to predict speech-understanding outcomes in implant recipients. The results indicate that the average clustering coefficient, both pre- and postimplantation, correlates with speech understanding outcomes.

A Consensus to Revise the Minimum Speech Test Battery-Version 3.

The Minimum Speech Test Battery (MSTB) for adults was introduced in 1996 (Nilsson et al., 1996) and subsequently updated in 2011 (Advanced-Bionics et al., 2011). The MSTB has been widely used by clinicians as a guide for cochlear implant (CI) candidacy evaluations and to document post-operative speech recognition performance. Due to changes in candidacy over the past 10 years, a revision to the MSTB was needed. In 2022, the Institute for Cochlear Implant Training (ICIT) recruited a panel of expert CI audiologists to update and revise the MSTB. This panel utilized a modified Delphi consensus process to revise the test battery and to improve its applicability considering recent changes in CI care. This resulted in the MTSB-Version 3 (MSTB-3), which includes test protocols for identifying not only traditional CI candidates but also possible candidates for electric-acoustic stimulation and patients with single-sided deafness and asymmetric hearing loss. The MSTB-3 provides information that supplements the earlier versions of the MSTB, such as recommendations of when to refer patients for a CI, recommended patient-reported outcome measures, considerations regarding the use of cognitive screeners, and sample report templates for clinical documentation of pre- and post-operative care. Electronic versions of test stimuli, along with all the materials described above, will be available to clinicians via the ICIT website (https://www.cochlearimplanttraining.com). The goal of the MSTB-3 is to be an evidence-based test battery that will facilitate a streamlined standard of care for adult CI candidates and recipients that will be widely used by CI clinicians.

Comparison of postural control and space perception outcomes between robotic and conventional cochlear implantation in adults.

The aim of the study is to capture the difference between the groups in direct relation to the type of electrode array insertion during cochlear implantation (CI). The robotic insertion is expected to be a more gently option. As recent studies have shown, there is a difference in perception of visual vertical (SVV) and postural control related to the CI. We assume that there can be differences in postural control and space perception outcomes depending on the type of the surgical method. In total, 37 (24 females, mean age ± SD was 42.9 ± 13.0) candidates for CI underwent an assessment. In 14 cases, the insertion of the electrode array was performed by a robotic system (RobOtol, Colin, France) and 23 were performed conventionally. In all of these patients, we performed the same examination before the surgery, the first day, and 3weeks after the surgery. The protocol consists of static posturography and perception of visual vertical. The both groups, RobOtol and conventional, responded to the procedure similarly despite the dissimilar electrode insertion. There was no difference between two groups in the dynamic of perception SVV and postural parameters. Patients in both groups were statistically significantly affected by the surgical procedure, SVV deviation appeared in the opposite direction from the implanted ear: 0.90° ± 1.25; -1.67° ± 3.05 and -0.19° ± 1.78 PRE and POST surgery (p < 0.001). And this deviation was spontaneously adjusted in FOLLOW-UP after 3weeks (p < 0.01) in the both groups. We did not find a significant difference in postural parameters between the RobOtol and conventional group, even over time. Although the robotic system RobOtol allows a substantial reduction in the speed of insertion of the electrode array into the inner ear, our data did not demonstrate a postoperative effect on vestibular functions (SVV and posturography), which have the same character and dynamics as in the group with standard manual insertion. The project is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (registration number: NCT05547113).

Vestibular Hypofunction Screening in Older Cochlear Implant Candidates.

Vestibular loss is associated with increasing age and hearing loss. Cochlear implantation (CI) may be performed in these patients; however, CI can induce vestibular hypofunction (VH) postoperatively. If CI is performed in the "better balancing ear," patients may experience vestibulopathy from new bilateral VH. The objective of this study was to evaluate the rates of VH in older CI candidates, thereby helping to identify patients at increased risk for bilateral VH after CI. Retrospective cohort study from 2019 to 2022 of patients age 60 to 80 years old who underwent videonystagmography (VNG). Tertiary care neurotology practice. VNG, including spontaneous nystagmus, cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP), caloric stimulation, and rotary chair, was reviewed and stratified by CI candidacy. Patients with prior CI or known vestibular diagnosis were excluded. Thirty-three patients were CI candidates and 184 patients were controls. cVEMP demonstrated a significantly greater rate of unilateral VH in CI candidates (P = .018). Caloric stimulation demonstrated an elevated rate of bilateral VH and presbyvestibulopathy in CI candidates (P = .057 and P = .036, respectively). Rotary chair demonstrated a significantly higher rate of bilateral VH and incomplete vestibular compensation based on reduced gain and gain asymmetry, respectively, in CI candidates (P < .001 and P = .043, respectively). Mean bithermal slow phase velocity sum and rotary chair gain were significantly lower in the CI candidate group (P = .002 and P < .001, respectively). Preoperative identification of VH determined the side of implantation in 4 patients (15%). VH and incomplete vestibular compensation are common and more frequently seen in CI candidates compared to age-matched controls. Vestibular screening can play a role in surgical counseling and planning, and should be considered in older patients undergoing CI.

Clinical Practice Guideline: Age-Related Hearing Loss Executive Summary.

Age-related hearing loss (ARHL) is a prevalent but often underdiagnosed and undertreated condition among individuals aged 50 and above. It is associated with various sociodemographic factors and health risks including dementia, depression, cardiovascular disease, and falls. While the causes of ARHL and its downstream effects are well defined, there is a lack of priority placed by clinicians as well as guidance regarding the identification, education, and management of this condition. The purpose of this clinical practice guideline is to identify quality improvement opportunities and provide clinicians trustworthy, evidence-based recommendations regarding the identification and management of ARHL. These opportunities are communicated through clear actionable statements with an explanation of the support in the literature, the evaluation of the quality of the evidence, and recommendations on implementation. The target patients for the guideline are any individuals aged 50 years and older. The target audience is all clinicians in all care settings. This guideline is intended to focus on evidence-based quality improvement opportunities judged most important by the Guideline Development Group (GDG). It is not intended to be a comprehensive, general guide regarding the management of ARHL. The statements in this guideline are not intended to limit or restrict care provided by clinicians based on their experience and assessment of individual patients. The GDG made strong recommendations for the following key action statements (KASs): (KAS 4) If screening suggests hearing loss, clinicians should obtain or refer to a clinician who can obtain an audiogram. (KAS 8) Clinicians should offer, or refer to a clinician who can offer, appropriately fit amplification to patients with ARHL. (KAS 9) Clinicians should refer patients for an evaluation of cochlear implantation candidacy when patients have appropriately fit amplification and persistent hearing difficulty with poor speech understanding. The GDG made recommendations for the following KASs: (KAS 1) Clinicians should screen patients aged 50 years and older for hearing loss at the time of a health care encounter. (KAS 2) If screening suggests hearing loss, clinicians should examine the ear canal and tympanic membrane with otoscopy or refer to a clinician who can examine the ears for cerumen impaction, infection, or other abnormalities. (KAS 3) If screening suggests hearing loss, clinicians should identify sociodemographic factors and patient preferences that influence access to and utilization of hearing health care. (KAS 5) Clinicians should evaluate and treat or refer to a clinician who can evaluate and treat patients with significant asymmetric hearing loss, conductive or mixed hearing loss, or poor word recognition on diagnostic testing. (KAS 6) Clinicians should educate and counsel patients with hearing loss and their family/care partner(s) about the impact of hearing loss on their communication, safety, function, cognition, and quality of life. (KAS 7) Clinicians should counsel patients with hearing loss on communication strategies and assistive listening devices. (KAS 10) For patients with hearing loss, clinicians should assess if communication goals have been met and if there has been improvement in hearing-related quality of life at a subsequent health care encounter or within 1 year. The GDG offered the following KASas an option: (KAS 11) Clinicians should assess hearing at least every 3 years in patients with known hearing loss or with reported concern for changes in hearing.

The (in)visibility of deafness: Identity, stigma, quality of lifeand the potential role of totally implantable cochlear implants.

The disclosure of deafness is complex, given the historic and on-going stigma associated with being deaf. The aim of this study was to explore how identity, stigma, and quality of life may be impacted when using cochlear implants (CIs) and totally implantable cochlear implants (TICIs). The physical difference between these two assistive listening devices is significant, given many CI users opt to hide their sound processor behind hair or headwear, in contrast to TICIs (an emerging technology) whereby all components are implanted internally and thus invisible. This qualitative study involved semistructured interviews and demographic questionnaires with 12 adult participants with more than 1 year of experience using their CI. Participants were recruited Australia-wide through community organisations that support deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals. Interview transcripts were analysed thematically, with the themes generated through an inductive process, with consensus generated through group working with three members from the research team. Four major themes were identified: (1) CI challenges; (2) The importance of social and support networks; (3) Identity and disclosure and (4) Concerns about TICIs. The underlying finding was centred around the construction of deaf identity. Participant attitudes were generally categorised as 'Loud and proud', with the recognition that displaying the CI was an extension of self, something to be proud of, and a means to normalise deafness; or 'Out of sight and out of mind', which sought to minimise the visibility of deafness. While both identities differed in how deafness is disclosed, they are fundamentally related to the same ideas of self-agency and empowerment. TICIs present a novel opportunity-the ability for CI users to control the visibility of their deafness and thus control disclosure. This study explored the impact of stigma and categorised two core identities that CI users construct. Future directions include investigating potential CI candidates, to explore if TICIs may be a facilitator to CI uptake. The semistructured interview guide was developed in consultation with adults with CIs. Feedback led to adjustments and improvement to the interview guide. In addition, F. R. has a lived experience with hearing loss, and C. Y. L. is an executive committee member for a nonprofit charity organisation that supports families that are D/deaf and hard-of-hearing.

Changes in visually and auditory attended audiovisual speech processing in cochlear implant users: A longitudinal ERP study

Limited auditory input, whether caused by hearing loss or by electrical stimulation through a cochlear implant (CI), can be compensated by the remaining senses. Specifically for CI users, previous studies reported not only improved visual skills, but also altered cortical processing of unisensory visual and auditory stimuli. However, in multisensory scenarios, it is still unclear how auditory deprivation (before implantation) and electrical hearing experience (after implantation) affect cortical audiovisual speech processing.Here, we present a prospective longitudinal electroencephalography (EEG) study which systematically examined the deprivation- and CI-induced alterations of cortical processing of audiovisual words by comparing event-related potentials (ERPs) in postlingually deafened CI users before and after implantation (five weeks and six months of CI use). A group of matched normal-hearing (NH) listeners served as controls. The participants performed a word-identification task with congruent and incongruent audiovisual words, focusing their attention on either the visual (lip movement) or the auditory speech signal. This allowed us to study the (top-down) attention effect on the (bottom-up) sensory cortical processing of audiovisual speech.When compared to the NH listeners, the CI candidates (before implantation) and the CI users (after implantation) exhibited enhanced lipreading abilities and an altered cortical response at the N1 latency range (90–150 ms) that was characterized by a decreased theta oscillation power (4–8 Hz) and a smaller amplitude in the auditory cortex. After implantation, however, the auditory-cortex response gradually increased and developed a stronger intra-modal connectivity. Nevertheless, task efficiency and activation in the visual cortex was significantly modulated in both groups by focusing attention on the visual as compared to the auditory speech signal, with the NH listeners additionally showing an attention-dependent decrease in beta oscillation power (13–30 Hz).In sum, these results suggest remarkable deprivation effects on audiovisual speech processing in the auditory cortex, which partially reverse after implantation. Although even experienced CI users still show distinct audiovisual speech processing compared to NH listeners, pronounced effects of (top-down) direction of attention on (bottom-up) audiovisual processing can be observed in both groups. However, NH listeners but not CI users appear to show enhanced allocation of cognitive resources in visually as compared to auditory attended audiovisual speech conditions, which supports our behavioural observations of poorer lipreading abilities and reduced visual influence on audition in NH listeners as compared to CI users.

"To implant or not to implant": electrically evoked auditory brainstem response audiometry for decision-making in vestibular schwannoma resection with CI.

Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are often associated with debilitating hearing loss. Therefore, preservation and rehabilitation of hearing have become major therapeutic goals of VS management. Recently, cochlear implantation (CI) has been established as an effective treatment option for VS-associated hearing loss. Nevertheless, the integrity and proper function of the cochlear nerve must be evaluated before conducting CI to ensure optimal CI outcomes. Various methods to determine cochlear nerve integrity and functionality have emerged in the last few years. Of these, the use of electrically evoked auditory brainstem response audiometry (eABR) in particular has been proven to be ameaningful tool for monitoring cochlear nerve health during VS surgery. Here, the cochlear nerve can be electrically stimulated using an intracochlear test electrode before, during, and after tumor extirpation. Subsequently, the resulting brainstem responses can be measured and interpreted accordingly to obtain direct information on the cochlear nerve function. This allows for continuous monitoring of cochlear nerve function throughout the course of VS surgery and aids in the decision-making for CI candidacy. Finally, in the case of preserved brainstem responses, CI can be performed instantly after VS extirpation. This simultaneous approach offers several advantages over two-staged procedures and has been shown to be an efficient and safe procedure for restoring hearing after VS removal.

Application of Genetic Information to Cochlear Implantation in Clinical Practice.

Cochlear implantation is currently the treatment of choice for children with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing impairment (SNHI). However, the outcomes with cochlear implant (CI) vary significantly among recipients. Genetic diagnosis offers direct clues regarding the pathogenesis of SNHI, which facilitates the development of personalized medicine for potential candidates for CI. In this article, I present a comprehensive overview of the usefulness of genetic information in clinical decision-making for CI. Genetically confirmed diagnosis enables clinicians to: 1) monitor the evolution of SNHI and determine the optimal surgical timing, 2) predict the potential benefits of CI in patients with identified genetic etiology, and 3) select CI devices/electrodes tailored to patients with specific genetic mutations.

Intraoperative assessment of cochlear nerve functionality in various vestibular schwannoma scenarios: Lessons learned

The use of cochlear implants (CIs) is on the rise for patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS). Besides CI following tumor resection, new scenarios such as implantation in observed and/or irradiated tumors are becoming increasingly common. A significant emerging trend is the need of intraoperative evaluation of the functionality of the cochlear nerve in order to decide if a CI would be placed. The purpose of this paper is to explore the experience of a tertiary center with the application of the Auditory Nerve Test System (ANTS) in various scenarios regarding VS patients. The results are compared to that of the studies that have previously used the ANTS in this condition.Patients with unilateral or bilateral VS (NF2) who were evaluated with the ANTS prior to considering CI in a tertiary center between 2021 and 2023 were analyzed. The presence of a robust wave V was chosen to define a positive electrical auditory brainstem response (EABR). Two patients underwent promontory stimulation (PromStim) EABR previous to ANTS evaluation.Seven patients, 2 NF-2 and 5 with sporadic VS were included. The initial scenario was simultaneous translabyrinthine (TL) tumor resection and CI in 3 cases while a CI placement without tumor resection was planned in 4 cases. The ANTS was positive in 4 cases, negative in 2 cases, and uncertain in one case. Two patients underwent simultaneous TL and CI, 1 patient simultaneous TL and auditory brainstem implant, 3 patients posterior tympanotomy with CI, and 1 patient had no implant placement. In the 5 patients undergoing CI, sound detection was present. There was a good correlation between the PromStim and ANTS EABR. The literature research yielded 35 patients with complete information about EABR response. There was one false negative and one false positive case; that is, the 28 implanted cases with a present wave V following tumor resection had some degree of auditory perception in all but one case.The ANTS is a useful intraoperative tool to asses CI candidacy in VS patients undergoing observation, irradiation or surgery. A positive strongly predicts at least sound detection with the CI.

Auditory Outcomes Following Cochlear Implantation in Children with Unilateral Hearing Loss.

Unilateral hearing loss (UHL) in children is associated with speech and language delays. Cochlear implantation (CI) is currently the only rehabilitative option that restores binaural hearing. This study aims to describe auditory outcomes in children who underwent CI for UHL and to determine the association between duration of hearing loss and auditory outcomes. Retrospective case series. Three tertiary-level, academic institutions. Children <18 years with UHL who underwent CI between 2018 and 2021. Cochlear implantation. Speech perception and Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) were assessed postimplantation. Scores >50% on speech perception and SSQ scores >8 points were considered satisfactory. Associations between duration of UHL and implantation age and outcomes were assessed using Spearman's rank correlation. Of the 38 children included, mean age at CI was 7.9 ± 3.2 years and mean UHL duration was 5.0 ± 2.8 years. Mean datalogging was 8.1 ± 3.1 hours/day. Mean auditory testing scores were SSQ, 7.9 ± 1.2; BABY BIO, 68.1 ± 30.2%; CNC, 38.4 ± 28.4%; WIPI, 52.5 ± 23.1%. Scores >50% on CNC testing were achieved by 40% of patients. SSQ scores >8 points were reported by 78% (7/9) of patients. There were no significant correlations between UHL duration and auditory outcomes. Overall, children with UHL who undergo CI can achieve satisfactory speech perception scores and SSQ scores. There were no associations between duration of hearing loss and age at implantation with auditory outcomes. Multiple variables may impact auditory outcomes, including motivation, family support, access to technology, and consistent isolated auditory training postactivation and should be taken into consideration in addition to age at implantation and duration of UHL in determination of CI candidacy.

Awareness of Health Professionals about Candidacy of Cochlear Implant

Background: Cochlear implants serve as a transformative solution for individuals with sensorineural hearing loss, particularly benefiting children aged 12-24 months with bilateral profound deafness who find little to no benefit from traditional hearing aids. This advanced auditory technology converts acoustic signals into electrical stimuli, directly stimulating the auditory nerve and thereby providing an essential hearing function. The determination of candidacy for cochlear implants is a collaborative process involving ENT specialists, audiologists, and speech and language pathologists. These devices significantly impact the lives of profoundly deaf individuals by offering a means to access sound and develop communication skills, crucial for their integration into a hearing world.&#x0D; Objective: To assess the awareness of health professionals about candidacy of cochlear implant.&#x0D; Methods: This cross-sectional study was meticulously designed, adhering to standardized protocols for data collection and analysis to enhance the reliability and validity of findings. The research unfolded in various government and private hospitals across Lahore, focusing on a specific cohort of health professionals—ENT specialists and speech and language pathologists. A total of 55 participants, both male and female, aged between 29 to 52 years, were systematically selected through non-probability convenience sampling. The assessment of awareness among these professionals regarding the candidacy for cochlear implants was conducted using a carefully structured pediatric checklist. This tool encompassed multiple items directly relating to the core candidacy criteria, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation of professional knowledge and awareness. The analysis was performed using statistical methods appropriate for cross-sectional data, aiming to draw meaningful insights from the responses collected.&#x0D; Results: The study's participant pool consisted of 24 ENT specialists (43.6%) and 31 speech and language pathologists (56.4%), highlighting a diverse representation of the field. Among these professionals, a significant discrepancy in awareness was observed. Those who had practical experience working in cochlear implant centers demonstrated a higher level of awareness, with nuanced understanding of both audiometric and speech-based candidacy criteria. Conversely, participants lacking this practical exposure showed considerable gaps in their knowledge, particularly in applying these criteria to pediatric cases. The numerical data revealed that only a fraction of the respondents could accurately identify all key candidacy indicators, underscoring the need for targeted educational interventions.&#x0D; Conclusion: The findings of this study underline a palpable deficiency in the awareness and understanding of cochlear implant candidacy criteria among ENT specialists and speech and language pathologists. Despite the critical role these professionals play in the identification and management of potential implant candidates, a notable portion exhibited limited knowledge, especially in aspects beyond their immediate field of expertise. This gap was more pronounced among those without direct experience in cochlear implant centers, suggesting that hands-on involvement significantly contributes to a deeper comprehension of candidacy nuances. Therefore, there is an urgent need for comprehensive training programs and continued professional development opportunities to bridge these knowledge gaps, ensuring that all children who could benefit from cochlear implants are accurately identified and referred.

Aberrant Course of the Intratemporal Facial Nerve in Children with Congenital Hearing Loss.

Congenital facial nerve (FN) malformations are uncommon. Our aim is to determine the clinical and radiological features of FN malformations along with the associated cochlear and vestibular malformations. We conducted a retrospective study including children with a profound sensorineural hearing loss who were candidates for cochlear implantation. We evaluated the presence of FN malformations through temporal bone computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging. We recorded an aberrant FN course in five out of 165 patients in a total of 9 ears. They consisted of a bifurcation of the mastoid segment, an anterior or posterior displacement of the labyrinthine segment and a hypoplasia of the geniculate ganglion. Associated inner ear malformations included vestibular aqueduct dilation, cochlear hypoplasia and total labyrinthine aplasia. We noted a bilateral agenesis of the cochlear nerve in three patients. Facial nerve malformations should be suspected in patients presenting a congenital hearing loss especially in association with other temporal bone malformations. Their pre-operative discovery is helpful in planning the surgical procedure.

Impact of unilateral vs. bilateral evaluation on cochlear implant candidacy

Background The indication criteria for cochlear implantation differ considerably across regions. Objectives To estimate the effects of different candidacy criteria on the number of cochlear implant (CI) candidates. Methods We analysed a very large clinical audiological database comprising pure-tone thresholds and speech-audiometric data in order to identify CI candidates on the basis of different audiometric candidacy criteria. In particular, we simulated the effects of three different CI candidacy criteria. Results The bilateral evaluation of CI candidacy has the strongest influence on the number of potential CI candidates. Additionally, the cut-off criteria for middle-ear implants have a large effect on numbers of candidates when air conduction has deteriorated. Conclusions and Significance: Expanding the indication criteria opens up the possibility of improving the accurate identification of individual cases suitable for cochlear-implant provision.