Heart Transplant Candidates Research Articles

Impact of mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in patients with advanced heart failure evaluated for heart transplantation

Abstract Background Heart transplantation is sometimes the only therapeutic option in patients with advanced heart failure (HF), impaired ventricular function and significant functional or secondary mitral regurgitation (MR). The shortage of organs and the limitations of the recipient make it necessary to consider other therapeutic alternatives in these patients, such as mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER). The MitraBridge registry has recently been published in which they analyze the potential effect of M-TEER in patients with advanced HF and moderate-severe MI who are candidates for heart transplantation (mean age 59 years, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 27%); after a mean follow-up of 24 months, complete in 82.4%, they report an overall survival of 78.5%, a combined event-free survival of 47%, with a 6.5 % need for urgent transplantation and an HF hospitalization rate after M-TEER of 44/100 patient-years. The aim of our study is to assess the impact of M-TEER on mortality and the combined events of death, HF rehospitalization and the need for urgent transplantation or a ventricular assistance device in patients with moderate-severe functional MI and advanced HF who have also been evaluated for cardiac transplantation in our hospital. Methods This is a retrospective analysis of a prospective registry. Of the patients treated by M-TEER for severe MI, we selected those with advanced HF (defined as LVEF≤35%, and/or advanced functional class (NYHA III-IV)) who had also been evaluated as possible candidates for inclusion in the heart transplant list. Results From November 2011 to December 2023, 191 patients were treated by M-TEER, of whom 38 patients met the established criteria (median age 59 years [48-65], 31 (81%) males, mean LVEF was 26 ± 6%). All patients had at least one previous hospitalization for HF and optimal medical treatment according to guidelines; the rest of the baseline clinical characteristics are listed in Table 1. During the follow-up after M-TEER, with a median of 34 months [7-70], the probability of overall survival at 2 years was 75.6%. The combined endpoint of death, need for urgent transplantation or a ventricular assist device, and rehospitalization for heart failure occurred in 26 patients with a 2-year event-free survival probability of 48% (Figure 1). Five patients (13%) were transplanted, one (2.6%) urgently. Prior to M-TEER therapy, the rate of HF hospitalization was 108 hospitalizations/100 patient-years, which was significantly reduced after the procedure to 33 hospitalizations/100 patient-years (rate ratio 0.31 [95% CI 0.21-0.45, p<0.0005]). Conclusions In patients with advanced HF and severe functional MR who are candidates for cardiac transplantation, M-TEER is an effective therapeutic alternative, achieving a survival rate of more than three-quarters of the patients at 2 years of follow-up, a significant reduction in HF hospitalizations, and a low rate of need for cardiac transplantation.

Long-term outcomes of heart re-transplantation from HCV-viremic donors based on UNOS registry

Abstract Background The use of hepatitis C virus (HCV) viremic donors increased the heart donor pool, and reduced waitlist time and mortality among first-time single-organ heart transplant (HT) candidates without compromising their post-transplant survival. The outcomes of heart re-transplantation (re-HT) with the use of HCV-viremic donor grafts have not been investigated. Methods Using the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) Registry we analyzed all adult patients who underwent single-organ heart re-HT in the United States between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022. HCV-viremic donors were defined by a positive nucleic acid amplification test (NAT+). Graft survival rates between HCV-viremic and HCV-non-viremic donor graft recipients were compared using a log rank test. Results During the study period, of 18,259 HTs performed, 427 (2.3%) constituted single-organ heart re-transplantations. Recipients of NAT+ grafts (n=19) compared to NAT- grafts (n=408) were more often male (84.2% vs 61.3%, p=0.04). Otherwise, there were no significant differences between the two groups in age, ethnicity, BMI, blood type, history of diabetes rates or stroke, creatinine or bilirubin levels, reason for re-HT, hemodynamics, use of mechanical circulatory support, and waitlist time. Ischemic time, frequency of female donors, HLA, ABO, CMV mismatch rates, and calculated panel reactive antibodies levels were comparable across the two groups. There were no significant differences in demographics or comorbidities rates between HCV-viremic and HCV-non-viremic donors apart from the cause of death. Among the donors of HCV-viremic grafts brain anoxia was reported more often (89.5%) than among HCV-non-viremic donors (40%), p <0.01. Rates of acute rejection treated in the first year after re-HT were comparable across the two groups. Over a mean follow-up of 3.0±2.1 and 3.3±1.8 years after re-HT from NAT- and NAT+ organ donors, respectively, graft survival rate at 1 year was 82% vs. 95% (p=0.3) and at 3 years 79% vs. 89%, respectively (p=0.6) (Figure). Conclusion Graft survival rates at 1 and 3 years post-heart re-HT in adult recipients of HCV-viremic donor grafts were comparable to those of recipients of HCV-non-viremic donor grafts. The current study provides compelling preliminary evidence that HCV-viremic donors constitute a viable donor pool for patients in need of heart re-transplantation.

TriVAD: Successful use of Impella 5.5 and Protek Duo CentriMag RVAD following Heartware HVAD thrombosis as a bridge to heart transplant.

Pump thrombosis remains a feared complication following placement of durable left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) and can be particularly detrimental to individuals being bridged to heart transplantation. Complications associated with this malfunction not only increase morbidity related to right heart failure, hemolysis, and other organ failure, but may ultimately jeopardize a patient's heart transplant candidacy. Additionally, reoperation for durable ventricular device replacement not only poses additional surgical risks to patients but can potentially complicate or even prohibit transplantation in the future. This case report describes a novel configuration of temporary, groin-free, percutaneously-deployed biventricular mechanical circulatory devices to support a patient with biventricular failure due to partial LVAD thrombosis. The use of less invasive mechanical support measures, such as the approach described here, may help patients achieve adequate hemodynamic support while allowing them to remain ambulatory and facilitate successful bridging to heart transplantation.

A Program Offering CT Colonography for Colorectal Cancer Screening Avoided Colonoscopy and Sedation Risks in High-Risk Heart Transplant Candidates and Expedited Screening: A Retrospective Observational Study

A Program Offering CT Colonography for Colorectal Cancer Screening Avoided Colonoscopy and Sedation Risks in High-Risk Heart Transplant Candidates and Expedited Screening: A Retrospective Observational Study

Impact of left ventricular unloading on postheart transplantation outcomes in patients bridged with VA-ECMO

Introduction and objectives: The impact of preoperative left ventricular (LV) unloading on postoperative outcomes in patients bridged with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) to heart transplantation (HT) is unknown. Our aim was to compare posttransplant outcomes in patients bridged to HT with VA-ECMO, with or without the use of different mechanical strategies for LV decompression.Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the postoperative outcomes of consecutive HT candidates bridged with VA-ECMO, with or without concomitant LV unloading. Patients were included from 16 Spanish centers from 2010 to 2020. The primary endpoint was 1-year post-HT survival, which was assessed using Cox regression.Results: Overall, 245 patients underwent high-emergency HT while supported with VA-ECMO. A mechanical strategy for LV unloading was used in 133 (54.3%) patients, with the intra-aortic balloon pump being the most commonly used method (n = 112; 84.2%). One-year posttransplant survival was 74.4% in the LV unloading group and 59.8% in the control group (P = .025). In multivariate analyses, preoperative LV unloading was independently associated with lower 1-year mortality (adjusted HR, 0.50; 95%CI, 0.32–0.78; P = .003). This association was observed both in patients managed with an intra-aortic balloon pump alone (adjusted HR, 0.52; 95%CI, 0.32–0.84; P = .007) and with other strategies for mechanical LV unloading (adjusted HR, 0.43; 95%CI, 0.19–0.97; P = .042). No significant differences were found between groups regarding other postoperative complications.Conclusions: Preoperative LV unloading was independently associated with increased 1-year posttransplant survival in candidates bridged with VA-ECMO.

Malnutrition risk, weight loss, and subsequent survival in patients listed for heart transplantation

BackgroundHigher malnutrition risk is associated with mortality among patients with heart failure and heart transplantation (HT). We investigated which malnutrition risk scores – geriatric nutrition risk index (GNRI), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), or controlling nutritional status (CONUT) – have the strongest mortality association for HT candidates, and whether they are prognostic at the time of HT listing or HT operation. MethodsWe reviewed adults listed for primary HT at a single center 1987–March 2022, with survival follow-up to November 2022. We constructed Cox proportional hazards models and restricted cubic spline curves for each risk score at both HT listing and HT operation and inputted HT operation as a time-varying covariate for models commencing at listing. Risk scores were assessed as continuous and binary variables. Weight change between listing and HT was evaluated similarly. ResultsThe 1024 patients (76% male; median age 55 [46-61] yrs; HT operation n=656) had median follow-up of 4.6 (interquartile range 1.6-8.7) years. As a continuous variable, lower GNRI at HT listing (greater malnutrition risk) was independently associated with higher mortality. As binary variables, higher risk GNRI, PNI or CONUT scores at listing were all associated with higher mortality. Conversely, risk scores at time of HT operation were not associated with subsequent mortality. There was a non-significant trend towards higher mortality with greater weight loss between listing and HT operation. ConclusionMalnutrition risk scores showed prognostic utility only at time of HT listing. As a continuous variable, GNRI at HT listing was independently associated with subsequent mortality.

The Association Between Pulmonary Vascular Resistance and Posttransplant Outcomes Differs by Left Ventricular Assist Device Status.

Elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) is a risk factor for mortality after heart transplantation (HT), but whether this association differs for patients with and without left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support before HT is unknown. We analyzed adult first-time HT recipients from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry transplanted between 2010 and 2021. We quantified the association between PVR and the outcomes of 30 day graft failure and 1 year mortality using multivariable logistic regression, stratified by LVAD support status at the time of HT. Pulmonary vascular resistance was modeled using restricted cubic splines to identify clinically relevant risk thresholds. We also examined the association with 10 year survival using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. For PVR values less than approximately 2 WU, higher PVR was independently associated with a higher risk of early graft failure (odds ratio [OR] = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.06-2.36) and a higher risk of 1 year mortality (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.10-1.59) among LVAD patients only (interaction p = 0.023 and 0.03, respectively). However, for patients surviving at least 1 year, PVR was not associated with long-term mortality among either subgroup. Whether more aggressive reduction of PVR among HT candidates supported with LVADs can mitigate these risks requires further study.

The impact of blood type and body size on successful bridging to heart transplantation using intra-aortic balloon pump or surgically implanted microaxial left ventricular assist device

ObjectiveWaitlist time for United Network for Organ Sharing Status 2 heart transplant candidates has steadily increased. We compared a bridging strategy using either the Impella 5.0/5.5 (“Impella”) or intra-aortic balloon pump with a durable left ventricular assist device in patients with blood type O stratified by body habitus. MethodsThe United Network for Organ Sharing registry was queried for adults listed for de novo heart transplantation (without dialysis) supported by the Impella, an intra-aortic balloon pump, or the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device. The primary outcome was 1-year postlisting survival, defined as the sum of waitlist time and post–heart transplant survival time if the candidate underwent heart transplantation. ResultsIn total, 2942 candidates were included (Impella: 214; intra-aortic balloon pump: 1326; HeartMate 3: 1402). Listing with the Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump was associated with worse postlisting survival compared with the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device in type O candidates (Impella: hazard ratio, 2.90 [95% CI, 1.48-5.67], P = .002; intra-aortic balloon pump: hazard ratio, 2.42 [95% CI, 1.59-3.68], P < .001) but less so in non–type O candidates. Further analysis of type O candidates demonstrated that the Impella and intra-aortic balloon pump were associated with a lower risk of postlisting mortality among those with normal height (25-75th percentile) and nonobese (body mass index <30) (Impella: hazard ratio, 1.78 [95% CI, 0.61-5.18], P = .292; intra-aortic balloon pump: hazard ratio, 1.28 [95% CI, 0.67-2.45], P = .455); among those not of normal height and nonobese, the Impella and intra-aortic balloon pump were associated with an elevated risk of postlisting mortality (Impella: hazard ratio, 3.65 [95% CI, 1.68-7.95], P = .001; intra-aortic balloon pump: hazard ratio, 3.01 [95% CI, 1.95-4.67], P < .001). ConclusionsBlood type O candidates listed with the Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump are at increased risk of postlisting mortality compared with a durable left ventricular assist device in the current organ allocation era. These effects are diminished among those with normal height and body habitus.

Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion of the donor heart in heart transplantation: the short-term outcome from a randomised, controlled, open-label, multicentre clinical trial

Static cold storage (SCS) remains the gold standard for preserving donor hearts before transplantation but is associated with ischaemia, anaerobic metabolism, and organ injuries, leading to patient morbidity and mortality. We aimed to evaluate whether continuous, hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) of the donor heart is safe and superior compared with SCS. We performed a multinational, multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label clinical trial with a superiority design at 15 transplant centres across eight European countries. Adult candidates for heart transplantation were eligible and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio. Donor inclusion criteria were age 18-70 years with no previous sternotomy and donation after brain death. In the treatment group, the preservation protocol involved the use of a portable machine perfusion system ensuring HOPE of the resting donor heart. The donor hearts in the control group underwent ischaemic SCS according to standard practices. The primary outcome was time to first event of a composite of either cardiac-related death, moderate or severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD) of the left ventricle, PGD of the right ventricle, acute cellular rejection at least grade 2R, or graft failure (with use of mechanical circulatory support or re-transplantation) within 30 days after transplantation. We included all patients who were randomly assigned, fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria, and received a transplant in the primary analysis and all patients who were randomly assigned and received a transplant in the safety analyses. This trial was registered with ClicalTrials.gov (NCT03991923) and is ongoing. A total of 229 patients were enrolled between Nov 25, 2020, and May 19, 2023. The primary analysis population included 204 patients who received a transplant. There were no patients who received a transplant lost to follow-up. All 100 donor hearts preserved with HOPE were transplantable after perfusion. The primary endpoint was registered in 19 (19%) of 101 patients in the HOPE group and 31 (30%) of 103 patients in the SCS group, corresponding to a risk reduction of 44% (hazard ratio 0·56; 95% CI 0·32-0·99; log-rank test p=0·059). PGD was the primary outcome event in 11 (11%) patients in the HOPE group and 29 (28%) in the SCS group (risk ratio 0·39; 95% CI 0·20-0·73). In the HOPE group, 63 (65%) patients had a reported serious adverse event (158 events) versus 87 (70%; 222 events) in the SCS group. Major adverse cardiac transplant events were reported in 18 (18%) and 33 (32%) patients in the HOPE and SCS group (risk ratio 0·56; 95% CI 0·34-0·92). Although there was not a significant difference in the primary endpoint, the 44% risk reduction associated with HOPE was suggested to be a clinically meaningful benefit. Post-transplant complications, measured as major adverse cardiac transplant events, were reduced. Analysis of secondary outcomes suggested that HOPE was beneficial in reducing primary graft dysfunction. HOPE in donor heart preservation addresses the existing challenges associated with graft preservation and the increasing complexity of donors and heart transplantation recipients. Future investigation will help to further elucidate the benefit of HOPE. XVIVO Perfusion.

Trends in heart transplant outcomes for patients over the age of 70 years in the United States: An analysis of the scientific registry of transplant recipients database

BackgroundPatients of advanced age are often considered to be poor candidates for heart transplant (HT). As the U.S. population continues to age, it is important for clinicians to understand how best to select patients for advanced therapies. MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of the U.S. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data from 2006 to August 2022 in adult recipients. Patients were excluded if they were multiorgan transplant, re-do transplants, or less than 1 year post transplant. ResultsRecipients ≥70 had a one-year survival of 87.5%, compared to 91.1% for <60, and 88.4% for 60-69 years (p<0.001). Survival improved numerically, but not significantly, as transplant eras progressed for those ≥70 years. Survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis was greatest at five years for <60 years (80.6%), compared to 60-69 years (78.2%) and ≥70 years (77.1%). When comparing 60-69 years to ≥70 years by this same metric, there was significant difference (p=0.12). One year survival for those ≥70 years has improved from 2000-2009 (80.7%) to 88.5% since October 2018 (p<0.001). As recipients increased in age, they were more likely to be male, and less likely to be Black or Hispanic/Latino (p<0.001). ConclusionOverall, HT outcomes are excellent for carefully selected patients ≥70 years, and transplanting patients in this age cohort can be considered.

Impact of Heart Failure Etiology on Waitlist Mortality in Heart Transplant Candidates Supported With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has gained traction as a bridge to heart transplantation (HT) but remains associated with increased waitlist mortality. This study explores whether this risk is modified by underlying heart failure (HF) etiology. Using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network registry, we conducted a retrospective review of first-time adult HT candidates from 2018 through 2022. Patients were categorized as "ECMO", if ECMO was utilized during the waitlisting period, or "No ECMO" otherwise. Patients were then stratified according to the following HF etiology: ischemic cardiomyopathy (CMP), dilated nonischemic CMP, restrictive CMP, hypertrophic CMP, and congenital heart disease (CHD). After baseline comparisons, waitlist mortality was characterized for ECMO and HF etiology using the Fine-Gray regression. A total of 16143 patients were identified of whom 7.0% (n=1063) were bridged with ECMO. Compared to No ECMO patients, ECMO patients had shorter waitlist durations (46.3 vs. 185.0 days, p<0.01) and were more likely to undergo transplantation (75.3%vs. 70.3%, p<0.01). Outcomes analysis revealed that ECMO was associated with increased mortality risk (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR]: 3.42, p<0.01), a risk that persisted in all subgroups and was notably high in CHD (SHR: 4.83, p<0.01) and hypertrophic CMP (SHR: 9.78, p<0.01). HF etiology comparison within ECMO patients revealed increased mortality risk with CHD (SHR: 3.22, p<0.01). Within No ECMO patients, hypertrophic CMP patients had lower mortality risk (SHR: 0.64, p=0.03). The increased waitlist mortality risk with ECMO persisted after stratification by HF etiology. These findings can help decision-making surrounding candidacy for cannulation and prognostic evaluation.

Hemoglobin Level Can Predict Heart Failure Hospitalization in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure Awaiting Heart Transplantation without Inotropes or Mechanical Circulatory Support.

Although anemia is a common comorbidity that often coexists with heart failure (HF), its clinical impact in patients with advanced HF remains unclear. We investigated the impact of hemoglobin levels on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced HF listed for heart transplantation without intravenous inotropes or mechanical circulatory support.We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients listed for heart transplantation at our institute who did not receive intravenous inotropes or mechanical circulatory support between 2011 and 2022. We divided the patients into those with hemoglobin levels lower or higher than the median value and compared the composite of all-cause death and HF hospitalization within 1 year from the listing date.We enrolled consecutive 38 HF patients (27 males, 49.1 ± 10.8 years old). The median hemoglobin value at the time of listing for heart transplantation was 12.9 g/dL, and 66.7% of the patients had iron deficiency. None of the patients in either group died within 1 year. The HF hospitalization-free survival rate was significantly lower in the lower hemoglobin group (40.9% versus 81.9% at 1 year, P = 0.020). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model analysis showed that hemoglobin as a continuous variable was an independent predictor for HF hospitalization (odds ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.49-0.97, P = 0.030).Hemoglobin level at the time of listing for heart transplantation was a predictor of hospitalization in heart-transplant candidates without intravenous inotropes or mechanical circulatory support.

Lost in Transplantation: Characterizing Racial Gaps in Physician Organ Offer Acceptance.

There are known racial disparities in the organ transplant allocation system in the United States. However, prior work has yet to establish if transplant center decisions on offer acceptance-the final step in the allocation process-contribute to these disparities. To estimate racial differences in the acceptance of organ offers by transplant center physicians on behalf of their patients. Retrospective cohort analysis using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) on patients who received an offer for a heart, liver, or lung transplant between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2020. Nationwide, waitlist-based. 32,268 heart transplant candidates, 102,823 liver candidates, and 25,780 lung candidates, all aged 18 or older. 1) Association between offer acceptance and two race-based variables: candidate race and donor-candidate race match; 2) association between offer rejection and time to patient mortality. Black race was associated with significantly lower odds of offer acceptance for livers (OR=0.93, CI: 0.88-0.98) and lungs (OR=0.80, CI: 0.73-0.87). Donor-candidate race match was associated with significantly higher odds of offer acceptance for hearts (OR=1.11, CI: 1.06-1.16), livers (OR=1.10, CI: 1.06-1.13), and lungs (OR=1.13, CI: 1.07-1.19). Rejecting an offer was associated with lower survival times for all three organs (heart hazard ratio=1.16, CI: 1.09-1.23; liver HR=1.74, CI: 1.66-1.82; lung HR=1.21, CI: 1.15-1.28). Our study analyzed the observational SRTR dataset, which has known limitations. Offer acceptance decisions are associated with inequity in the organ allocation system. Our findings demonstrate the additional barriers that Black patients face in accessing organ transplants and demonstrate the need for standardized practice, continuous distribution policies, and better organ procurement.

The Impact of Ipsilateral Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Axillary Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Support as Bridge to Heart Transplantation.

The axillary artery (AX) access for intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) as a bridge to heart transplant (HT) allows mobility while awaiting a suitable donor. As end-stage heart failure patients often have an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) on the left side, the left AX approach may be avoided due to the perception of difficult access and proximity of two devices. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients bridged to HT with a left-sided AX IABP with or without ipsilateral ICDs. We retrospectively reviewed HT candidates at our institution supported by left-sided axillary IABP from November 2019 to February 2024, dividing them into two groups based on the presence (Group ICD, n = 48) or absence (Group No-ICD, N = 19) of an ipsilateral left-sided ICD. The exposure time was defined as the time from skin incision to the beginning of anastomoses of a Dacron graft. Technical success was achieved in 100% of the cohort, with median exposure times for AX access similar between groups (ICD, 12 [7.8, 18.2] vs. No ICD, 11 [7, 19] min; p = 0.75). The rate of procedural adverse events, such as significant access site bleeding and ipsilateral limb ischemia, did not significantly differ between both groups. Device malfunction rates were comparable (ICD, 29.2%vs. No ICD, 15.8%; p = 0.35). Posttransplant, in-hospital mortality, severe primary graft dysfunction, and stroke rates were comparable in both groups. The presence of an ipsilateral left-sided ICD does not adversely impact the procedural efficacy, complication rates, or posttransplant outcomes of left-sided AX IABP insertion in HT candidates.

Dobutamine in the Management of Advanced Heart Failure.

Background: The potential harm and clinical benefits of inotropic therapy in patients with decompensated heart failure with reduced ejection fraction or advanced heart failure were debated for three decades. Nonetheless, confronted with a dismal quality of life in the last months to years of life, continuous home inotropic therapy has recently gained traction for palliative therapy in patients who are not candidates for left ventricular mechanical circulatory support or heart transplantation. Methods: As continuous inotropic therapy is only considered for patients who experience symptomatic relief and display objective evidence of improvement, clinical equipoise is no longer present, and randomized controlled trials are hard to conduct. Results: We first outline the transient use of inotropic therapy in patients with decompensated heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and emphasize the hemodynamic requisite for inotropic therapy, which is a demonstration of a low cardiac output through a low mixed venous oxygen saturation. Lastly, we review the current experience with the use of home inotropic therapy in patients who are not candidates or are awaiting mechanical circulatory support or heart transplantation. Conclusions: Evidence-based clinical data are needed to guide inotropic therapy for refractory decompensated heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in patients who are ineligible or awaiting mechanical circulatory support or heart transplantation.

Surgical Management of Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Patients with Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Is It Time to Reconsider Revascularization Surgery?

Ischemic cardiomyopathy patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction are a specific group of patients with poor surgical outcomes. There are few surgical treatment options in practice for the treatment of these patients such as heart transplantation, coronary artery bypass surgery, surgical ventricular restoration, etc. Despite multiple treatment options, there are no explicit clinical guidelines available to guide surgeons in choosing the most appropriate option and ensuring that the specific patient can benefit from the selected surgical treatment. Heart transplantation is the gold standard treatment for ischemic cardiomyopathy patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction, but it is limited to very few highly equipped centers around the world due to donor shortages, complex perioperative and surgical management, and limited technological and human resources. It is evident from some studies that heart transplant-eligible candidates can benefit from alternative surgical options such as coronary artery bypass surgery alone or combined with surgical ventricular restoration. Therefore, alternative surgical options that are used for most of the population, especially in developing and underdeveloped countries, need to be discussed to improve their outcomes. A challenge in the recent era which has yet to find a solution is to determine which heart transplant candidate can benefit from simple revascularization compared to a complex heart transplantation procedure. Myocardial viability testing was one of the most important determinants in deciding whether a patient should undergo revascularization, but its role in guiding appropriate surgical options has been challenged. This review aims to discuss the available surgical management options and their long-term outcomes for patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, which will eventually help surgeons when choosing a surgical procedure.

For your consideration: Benefits of listing as willing to consider heart offers from donors with hepatitis C

BackgroundDespite excellent outcomes of heart transplants from hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive donors (D+), many candidates are not listed to even consider HCV D+ offers. MethodsUsing the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we identified adult (age ≥18 years) heart transplant candidates prevalent on the waitlist between 2018 and March 2023. We compared the likelihood of waitlist mortality or heart transplant by candidate willingness to consider HCV D+ offers using competing risk regression. ResultsWe identified 19,415 heart transplant candidates, 68.9% of whom were willing to consider HCV D+ offers. Candidates willing to consider HCV D+ offers had a 37% lower risk of waitlist mortality (subhazard ratio [SHR], 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-0.70; P < .001) than candidates not willing to consider HCV D+ offers, after adjustment for covariates and center-level clustering. Over the same period, heart transplant candidates willing to consider HCV D+ offers had a 21% higher likelihood of receiving a transplant (SHR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.7-1.26; P < .001). As a result, among candidates willing to consider HCV D+ offers, 74.9% received a transplant and 6.1% died/deteriorated after 3 years, compared to 68.3% and 9.1%, respectively, of candidates not willing to consider HCV D+ offers. Lower waitlist mortality also was observed on subgroup analyses of candidates on temporary and durable mechanical circulatory support. ConclusionsWillingness to consider HCV D+ heart offers was associated with a 37% lower risk of waitlist mortality and a 21% higher likelihood of receiving a transplant. We urge providers to encourage candidates to list as being willing to consider offers from donors with hepatitis C to optimize their waitlist outcomes and access to transplantation.

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: from evidence to clinical practice

Mortality for cardiogenic shock is still high despite optimal pharmacological therapy. Therefore, active mechanical circulatory support devices are increasingly used; venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) enables full circulatory and respiratory support. However, recent data show that in patients with infarct-related shock unselected early use of VA-ECMO does not improve survival and is associated with major bleeding and peripheral ischemic complications. Nowadays, waiting for the results of definitive randomized controlled trials, the main indication for ECMO utilization is in selected patients with cardiac arrest, in those with shock for advanced heart failure refractory to conventional therapy, in those with fulminant myocarditis, in patients candidate for heart transplant or ventricular assistance, especially in presence of respiratory insufficiency and severe biventricular dysfunction. An important recommendation is its utilization in specialized, high-volume centers in the setting of hub and spoke hospitals.

Prognostic Value of APACHE IV Score in Patients Bridged to Heart Transplantation on ECMO.

Methods for risk stratification of candidates for heart transplantation (HTx) supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are limited. We evaluated the reliability of the APACHE IV score to identify the risk of mortality in this patient subset in a multicenter study. Between January 2010 and December 2022, 167 consecutive ECMO patients were bridged to HTx; they were divided into two groups, according to a cutoff value of APACHE IV score, obtained by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for 90-day mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted, and compared through the log-Rank test. Cox regression model was used to estimate which factors were associated with survival. The 90-day mortality prediction of the APACHE IV score showed an area under the curve of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80-0.94), with a cutoff value of 49 (specificity 91.7%-sensibility 69.6%). 125 patients (74.8%) showed an APACHE IV score value < 49 (Group A), and 42 (25.2%)≥49 (Group B). 90-day mortality was 11.2% in Group A and 76.2% in Group B (p<0.01). Survival at 1 and 5 years was 85.5%, 77% versus 23.4%, 23.4% (p<0.01) in Groups A and B. Mortality correlated at univariable analysis with recipient age, body mass index, mechanical ventilation, APACHE IV score, and platelets number. At multivariable analysis only APACHE IV score (HR: 1.07 [1.05-1.09, 95% CI]) independently affected survival. The APACHE IV score represents a powerful predictor of survival in patients bridged to HTx on ECMO support, and could guide candidacy of patients on ECMO.

Human Applications of the Anstadt Cup: Implications for Non–Blood-Contacting Biventricular Support

BackgroundDirect mechanical ventricular actuation (DMVA) with the Anstadt cup is effective for non–blood-contacting biventricular support. Pneumatic regulation of a silicone device augments ventricular pump function. Vacuum attachment facilitates diastolic augmentation critical for biventricular support. This report reviews outcomes in patients supported for bridge to transplantation. MethodsDMVA was approved by the institutional review board at Duke University for refractory cardiogenic shock in potential candidates for heart transplantation. Devices with silicone membranes were controlled by pneumatic drive systems. Explanted hearts underwent extensive histologic examination. ResultsFive patients met inclusion criteria. All exhibited immediate return of physiologic pulsatile flow and reduced pulmonary pressures during device insertion. Vasopressors, inotropes, and balloon pump support were discontinued at implantation or within 48 hours. Installation through left thoracotomy (n = 4) took <5 minutes. Postcardiotomy support (n = 1) enabled routine decannulation. Support ranged from 2 to 84 days. Long-term survivors (n = 2) received 2 days of DMVA bridging to heart transplantation and 7.5 days of DMVA for acute myocarditis. There were no device-related complications. An expert cardiovascular pathologist found no evidence of device-related myocardial trauma or injury (n = 4) and no adverse effects on bypass grafts (n = 1). Recovery was deemed futile (n = 3) after diffuse cerebral emboli from prior aortic cross-clamp and extended cardiopulmonary resuscitation and for preexisting sepsis leading to end-organ failure. ConclusionsDMVA with the Anstadt cup effectively supported the failing or arrested heart in humans without adverse cardiac effects. Unique diastolic augmentation, return of physiologic pulsatile flow, and no blood contact contribute to device efficacy.