Cancer Patients Of Childbearing Age Research Articles

Effectiveness of a narrative nursing intervention on reproductive concerns in women of childbearing age undergoing cervical cancer surgery: A randomized controlled trial

ObjectiveThis study aims to explore the intervention effects of narrative nursing on the reproductive concerns of cervical cancer patients of childbearing age undergoing surgical treatment. MethodsPatients undergoing cervical cancer surgery with moderate to severe levels of reproductive concerns, treated between January and December 2023 at a tertiary Grade-A oncology hospital in China, were selected as the research subjects. Patients were randomized into an intervention group and a control group, each consisting of 33 patients. The control group received standard nursing care, while the intervention group received a narrative nursing intervention in addition to standard care. The changes in the levels of reproductive concerns, post-traumatic growth, and quality of life scores before and after the intervention were compared between the two groups. ResultsAfter the intervention, the reproductive concerns scores of the cervical cancer patients in the intervention group (32.53 ± 4.77) were significantly lower than those in the control group (59.29 ± 3.24), with a statistically significant difference (t = 26.143, p < 0.001). The post-traumatic growth scores in the intervention group (86.78 ± 3.52) were significantly higher than those in the control group (68.06 ± 6.24), with a statistically significant difference (t = −14.595, p < 0.001). The quality of life scores in the intervention group (149.00 [IQR = 8.75]) were significantly higher than those in the control group (129.00 [IQR = 13.00]), with a statistically significant difference (z = −5.799, p < 0.001). ConclusionNarrative nursing can effectively alleviate reproductive concerns in cervical cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment, promote positive psychological changes post-trauma, and improve patients' quality of life.

Childbirth after perioperative systemic therapy in patients with breast cancer: a retrospective single institutional study in Japan.

The number of breast cancer patients of childbearing age has been increasing. Therefore, we investigated the characteristics and the childbearing status of the patients who received systemic therapy for breast cancer during their childbearing age to better understand the clinical impact of childbirth. Female patients with breast cancer younger than 40years old who underwent surgery and received perioperative systemic therapy from 2007 to 2014 were included in this study. We compared the characteristics of patients with and without childbirth after treatment. Of 590 patients, 26 delivered a child, and 355 did not bear a child during the median observation period of 8.1years, whilst 209 had unknown childbirth data. The childbirth group had a lower mean age at surgery (32.2 vs. 35.1, P<0.001). The proportion of patients who desired childbirth and used assisted reproductive technology was significantly higher in the childbirth group (65.4 vs. 23.9% and 45.2 vs. 5.1%, respectively, P<0.001). The patients in the childbirth group had significantly less advanced disease (P=0.002). In the childbirth group, the age at childbirth was significantly older in patients who received combined endocrine therapy and chemotherapy (40.8years) than in patients who received either alone (endocrine therapy: 36.9years, chemotherapy: 36.7years, P=0.04). However, survival was not different between those with and without childbirth. It is critical to recognize the desire for childbirth in patients with breast cancer who are receiving systemic therapy and to provide them with necessary fertility information before treatment to support their decision-making.

Abstract P5-07-01: Outcomes of multidisciplinary team approach and intensive patient education in young women with breast cancer to improve the rate of fertility preservation

Abstract Background Young breast cancer patients of childbearing age often had to give up their opportunity as women or mothers for cancer treatment. As the survival rate of young breast cancer patients increases with advances in early detection and treatment of breast cancer, interest in issues such as fertility preservation, which have not been satisfied so far, is increasing. This study aims to report the experience of improvement of the fertility preservation rate through a multidisciplinary team approach and systematic patient education for young breast cancer patients. Methods Patients treated with multidisciplinary team approach including surgical, medical oncologist and fertility specialist were included for analysis. Patient were divided into two periods: before and after intensive patient education. Patient education included in-person counseling, hand-out materials, and audiovisual education about ovarian dysfunctions related to cancer treatment and fertility preservation methods. We compared the rate of fertility counseling, preservation between two periods. Also, effect of hormonal receptor status on fertility outcome with pregnancy and birth were analyzed. Results The rates of fertility counseling (39.4% to 58.1%), ovarian function preservation with gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonists (37.8% to 49.7%), and either embryo (0.9% to 5.6%) or oocyte preservation (0 to 7.5%) were significantly increased (all, p&amp;lt; 0.001) after intensive patient education. Pregnancy (9.5% vs 14.2%, p=0.034) and birth rate (7.7% vs 12.2%, p=0.043) were significantly higher with women with negative hormone receptor status. In hormone receptor positive patients, similar pregnancy rates were observed (13.3 ~ 15.4%) in patients who complete 5yearsd of endocrine therapy, stopped endocrine therapy due to side effects, and received no endocrine therapy. Patients with any type of recurrence were not pregnant during follow up period. Patients who stopped endocrine therapy for child plan showed highest rate of pregnancy (56.0%). Multivariable analysis revealed intensive education were highly associated with improved fertility outcomes (OR 3.843 95% CI 2.781–5.311, p=&amp;lt; 0.001) after adjusted for different stage and treatment modality. Conclusion Multidisciplinary team approach with intensive patient education of fertility preservation in young women breast cancer significantly improved fertility preservation attempt. Hormonal receptor status and recurrence were associated with impaired fertility outcomes Citation Format: Young Joo Lee, Hayan Han, Hee Jeong Kim. Outcomes of multidisciplinary team approach and intensive patient education in young women with breast cancer to improve the rate of fertility preservation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-07-01.

Construction and validation of a prognostic nomogram in metastatic breast cancer patients of childbearing age: A study based on the SEER database and a Chinese cohort.

Cancer in patients of childbearing age continues to become increasingly common. The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specifific survival (CSS) in patients of childbearing age and to construct prognostic nomograms to predict OS and CSS. Data from MBC patients of childbearing age were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2015, and the patients were randomly assigned into the training and validation cohorts. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to search for independent prognostic factors impacting OS and CSS, and these data were used to construct nomograms. The concordance index (C-index), area under the curve (AUC), and calibration curves were used to determine the predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the nomograms. Additional data were obtained from patients at the Yunnan Cancer Hospital to further verify the accuracy of the nomograms. A total of 1,700 MBC patients of childbearing age were identifified from the SEER database, and an additional 92 eligible patients were enrolled at the Yunnan Cancer Hospital. Multivariate Cox analyses identifified 10 prognostic factors for OS and CSS that were used to construct the nomograms. The calibration curve for the probabilities of OS and CSS showed good agreement between nomogram prediction and clinical observations. The C-index of the nomogram for OS was 0.735 (95% CI = 0.725-0.744); the AUC at 3 years was 0.806 and 0.794 at 5 years.The nomogram predicted that the C-index of the CSS was 0.740 (95% CI = 0.730- 0.750); the AUC at 3 years was 0.811 and 0.789 at 5 years. The same results were observed in the validation cohort. Kaplan- Meier curves comparing the low-,medium-, and high-risk groups showed strong prediction results for the prognostic nomogram. We identifified several independent prognostic factors and constructed nomograms to predict the OS and CSS for MBC patients of childbearing age.These prognostic models should be considered in clinical practice to individualize treatments for this group of patients.

An Educational Need Regarding Treatment-Related Infertility and Fertility Preservation: a National Survey Among Members of the Dutch Society for Medical Oncologists

Cancer diagnosis and treatment may influence reproductive planning and impact fertility in patients of reproductive age. Although guidelines have been established in the past decade, education, practice, and attitudes of medical oncologists regarding fertility preservation remain undecided. A nationwide survey was performed among members of the Dutch Society for Medical Oncology. Demographics, practice, knowledge, and barriers were measured regarding information provision of fertility preservation towards cancer patients of childbearing age. From 392 members, 120 oncologists completed the questionnaire (30.6%). Majority of oncologists was convinced it is their responsibility to discuss impact of cancer treatment to fertility (93.2%), yet 68.3% discussed the subject often or always (n = 82). Oncologists employed in district general hospitals were less likely to discuss fertility (p = 0.033). On average, 44.6% of reproductive men and 28.9% of reproductive women is referred to fertility specialists. Half of the respondents declared to possess sufficient knowledge regarding fertility preservation (n = 57, 47.5%). Poor prognosis (53%), unlikely survival (43.1%), and high chances on fertility recovery (28.7%) were identified as barriers to discussing fertility preservation. Among oncologists, impact of cancer treatment on fertility is a well-accepted responsibility to counsel. Despite, self-reported knowledge regarding fertility preservation is strongly varying. In practice, fertility is discussed to some extent, influenced by several barriers and depending on prognosis and type of hospital. Patients benefit from knowledge improvement among oncology care providers concerning fertility effects of cancer treatment. Education during medical school, residency, and among practicing oncologists may raise awareness, together with enhancement of referral possibilities.

Perceptions of Oncology Nurses Regarding Fertility Preservation and Providing Oncofertility Services for Men of Childbearing Age with Cancer.

This study investigated the knowledge, thoughts, and attitudes of oncology nurses in China regarding fertility preservation for male cancer patients of childbearing age, and for offering counseling or oncofertility services for the men in their care. Data was collected from 18 oncology nurses in Southwest China through voluntary self-report and in-depth interviews. The qualitative interview data were analyzed using a descriptive phenomenology method based on the lived experience of the nurses. The interviewees commonly reported 6 main concerns regarding fertility preservation (FP): their insufficient knowledge and inadequate nursing education; the importance of offering such services to cancer patients; legal vulnerability if FP information is withheld from patients; the role of the nurse in counseling; and barriers to discussing FP in practice. Nurses had a positive attitude toward FP, but most had no practical role in routinely informing male patients of their options, and the nurses believed that discussion of FP was outside their scope of practice. This study offers insight into the perceptions of oncology nurses in a developing country regarding the provision of FP services for adult male cancer patients. These results lead us to recommend that local fertility nurses should be given new training regarding FP. Furthermore, nurse-led clinics are desirable. Future research should focus on the effectiveness of nurse participation in FP counseling and referral, and how to improve the professional confidence of oncology nurses for addressing FP issues.

Construction and Validation of Nomograms Predicting Survival in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients of Childbearing Age.

BackgroundTriple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is one of the most aggressive subtypes of breast cancer with poorest clinical outcomes. Patients of childbearing age have a higher probability of TNBC diagnosis, with more demands on maintenance and restoration of physical and psychosocial function. This study aimed to design effective and comprehensive nomograms to predict survival in these patients.MethodsWe used the SEER database to identify patients with TNBC aged between 18 and 45 and randomly classified these patients into a training (n=2,296) and a validation (n=2,297) cohort. Nomograms for estimating overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were generated based on multivariate Cox proportional hazards models and competing-risk models in the training cohort. The performances of the nomograms were quantified in the validation cohort using calibration curves, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Harrell’s concordance index (C-index).ResultsA total of 4,593 TNBC patients of childbearing age were enrolled. Four prognostic factors for OS and six for BCSS were identified and incorporated to construct nomograms. In the validation cohort, calibration curves showed excellent agreement between nomogram-predicted and actual survival data. The nomograms also achieved relatively high Harrell’s C-indexes and areas under the time-dependent ROC curves for estimating OS and BCSS in both training and validation cohorts.ConclusionsIndependent prognostic factors were identified, and used to develop nomograms to predict OS and BCSS in childbearing-age patients with TNBC. These models could enable individualized risk estimation and risk-adapted treatment for these patients.

Maternal survival of patients with pregnancy-associated cancers in Taiwan - A national population-based study.

Pregnancy‐associated cancer (PAC), defined as cancers diagnosed during pregnancy or the first year after delivery, affects one to two in every 1000 pregnancies. Although PAC is expected to be a growing issue, information about PAC in the Asian population is still scarce. Women with cancer diagnosed at the age of 16–49 years between 2001 and 2015 were selected from the Taiwan Cancer Registry and linked with the National Birth Reporting Database to identify PAC patients. We compared the overall survival of patients with PAC to patients without pregnancy. Among 126,646 female cancer patients of childbearing age, 512 were diagnosed during pregnancy, and 2151 during the first postpartum year. Breast cancer was the most common PAC (N = 755, 28%). Compared with patients without pregnancy in the control group, patients with cancers diagnosed during pregnancy and the first postpartum year generally had more advanced stages (odds ratio 1.35 and 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02–1.77 and 1.18–1.57, respectively). For all cancer types combined and controlled for the stage, age, and year of diagnosis, patients with PAC had similar overall survival with those in the control group, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.07 (95% CI 0.80–1.41) for the pregnancy group and HR 1.02 (95% CI 0.88–1.18) for the postpartum group. The diagnosis of breast cancer during the first postpartum year was linked with shorter survival (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.05–1.72). In contrast, patients with postpartum lymphoma (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.02–0.79) and cervical cancer (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.20–0.82) had better prognosis. In general, the diagnosis of cancer during pregnancy or the first postpartum year does not affect the survival of patients with most cancer types. Exceptions include the worse prognosis of postpartum breast cancer and the better outcome of postpartum lymphoma and cervical cancer.

The Educational Program for Healthcare Providers Regarding Fertility Preservation for Cancer Patients: a Systematic Review.

The emerging discipline of oncofertility advocates for the timely provision of fertility preservation (FP) to all cancer patients of childbearing age by healthcare providers. A lack of practice due to limited FP-related knowledge was found among healthcare providers. A systematic review was undertaken on the educational programs on FP for healthcare providers. An initial search was performed in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases in October 2019. This review was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Among the 160 articles that were identified, five relevant articles published between 2009 and 2019 were reviewed. Of the five studies, three were quantitative nonrandomized studies, one was a randomized controlled trial, and one was a qualitative study. Three programs were relevant to oncology nurses, one was relevant to social workers as well as nurses, and one was relevant to oncology fellows and residents. The four programs significantly increased healthcare providers' knowledge about FP, but clinical practice was only improved in the Educating Nurses about Reproductive Issues in Cancer Healthcare program (P < 0.01). Nevertheless, most of the studies used a self-made questionnaire or tool to assess the effects of the training programs. The educational programs improved the FP-related knowledge of healthcare providers but lacked the high-quality randomized controlled trials needed to provide robust evidence on the effectiveness of training programs using standard tools. More training projects should be developed based on learning theories or models to improve oncofertility care in clinical practice.

Family building preferences among young women with invasive breast cancer.

e24057 Background: The American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines recommend discussing the possibility of infertility in cancer patients of childbearing age being treated with gonadotoxic therapies. This prospective study examines the reproductive history and future family building preferences of young women with breast cancer. Methods: This is an Institutional Review Board approved prospective study of women &lt; 45 years of age with non-metastatic invasive breast cancer who completed a questionnaire on reproductive history and family building preferences between April 2013 and December 2019. Questionnaires were administered at initial diagnosis and then annually. Results: Baseline questionnaires were completed by 164 women with a median age of 39 years old (range 20-45); 110 (59%) completed the 1 year follow up survey. Clinicopathologic features and treatment are shown in the table. The majority of women (n = 90, 55%) were parous and many had previous infertility (n = 60, 37%) at time of diagnosis. Most women (n = 87, 53%) wanted additional children or were unsure. Interest in embryo and/or oocyte cryopreservation was common (n = 51, 31%) as was interest in adoption (n = 52, 32%). Of the 110 women who completed the one year follow-up, 39 (35%) saw a reproductive endocrinologist, including 22 (20%) who elected embryo (n = 14) or oocyte (n = 8) cryopreservation. Overall, 88 (80%) women declined fertility preservation. The most common reasons included worrying about delay in cancer treatment (n = 10, 9%), fear of hormonal exposure (n = 7, 6%), and feeling rushed into making a decision (n = 6, 6%). Of 92 women with available data regarding satisfaction with their decision to pursue fertility preservation or not, 84% (n = 77) reported satisfaction whereas 14% (n = 15) reported mixed feelings or regret. Conclusions: Young women with breast cancer expressed a significant interest in family building options. However, pursuit of fertility preservation was uncommon despite a high rate of prior infertility in this cohort of mostly parous women. Decisional satisfaction was common. Further study of factors contributing to patient decision-making regarding fertility preservation and alternative family building options is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01788839 . [Table: see text]

The Knowledge, Attitude, and Self-Reported Behaviors of Oncology Physicians Regarding Fertility Preservation in Adult Cancer Patients

There is a growing concern about the fertility preservation for adult cancer patients of reproductive age. Very little literature exists about fertility preservation of cancer survivors in Chinese text. This study is first to describe the knowledge level, attitude, and practice behaviors among physicians concerning fertility preservation in adult cancer patients in China. A cross-sectional survey with 30-item was conducted to assess Chinese oncology physicians’ knowledge, attitude, and behaviors regarding fertility issues. Of 360 oncology physicians, 206 (57.2%) submitted valid questionnaires. With possible overall scores for knowledge and attitude of 9 and 15, respectively, physicians’ responses to the questionnaires were 3.91 ± 1.67 and 12.29 ± 1.23. Only 49.5% of physicians routinely informed their cancer patients of childbearing age about the risk of infertility with cancer treatment. The knowledge score of the men physicians was 2-fold that of the women. Physicians aged 20–29 years were significantly more likely than other age groups to prioritize cancer treatment over fertility concerns. Men physicians were significantly more comfortable than the women discussing fertility preservation issues and cooperating with fertility specialists. The oncology physicians in China had limited knowledge of fertility preservation and rarely discussed these issues with their patients, although their attitude was positive. Results suggest that oncology physicians would welcome an in-house fertility-related training program.Key MessagesThis is the first study to address the topic of fertility preservation as it relates to the care that oncologists provide to cancer patients in China. These results revealed the importance of providing fertility-related training program to oncology physicians. Moreover, this study should provide useful information for other Asian countries, and highlight both the similarities and differences between China and Western countries concerning the reproductive rights of patients. This study should encourage international cooperation with institutions of scientific research and education.

Level of Knowledge and Needs on Fertility Preservation in Reproductive-Aged Male Patients with Cancer

There is a growing concern about the fertility preservation (FP) for cancer patients of childbearing age. This study is the first in China to survey men with cancer, of reproductive age, regarding their knowledge of FP and their related needs. A 12-item cross-sectional survey was conducted of 332 male patients. The score for knowledge of FP was 3.5 ± 0.67, of a possible score of 8. Only 10.6% of the subjects had chosen to preserve fertility before treatments, but during therapy 68.7% wanted more information about FP. Younger patients were more likely have more knowledge concerning FP than older patients (odds ratio [OR] 0.86). The decision to make arrangements for FP before treatments was heavily influenced by being young and without children (OR, 0.78; OR, 0.11). Male cancer patients of reproductive age had limited knowledge of FP, and the majority was disinclined to make FP arrangements before therapy in China. Therefore, male cancer survivors should be well informed about FP soon after diagnosis and programs should be considered to improve the FP-related knowledge of male cancer survivors. We suggest that an assessment of patients’ understanding of FP issues, before treatment, should be standard in clinical work.

Awareness of Female Cancer Patients About the Risk of Impaired Fertility.

Purpose: To evaluate awareness of female cancer patients about fertility impairment following cancer treatment. Patients and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Imam Hossein Hospital between March 2014 and July 2015. Women of childbearing age with cancer who were treated in an oncology clinic and referred for follow-up were asked to fill out the questionnaire designed for this purpose. The process of filling out the questionnaire was managed by a resident of clinical oncology during patient interviews. Results: Two hundred forty-seven patients with mean age of 35.5 years were included. The most common cancers were breast cancer (61.9%) and gynecologic cancer (10.9%). Among all patients, 22.7% had received information about infertility risk. The likelihood that women would have received information about fertility varied by cancer type. Among women with gynecologic cancers, only 59.3% had received information about the effects of treatment on fertility despite having cancers of the reproductive system. Moreover, 19.6% of women with breast cancer and 18.5% of those with other cancers had received fertility information (p < 0.001). Significance of Results: Knowledge and awareness of female cancer patients of childbearing age about the impact of cancer treatment on fertility and fertility preservation are limited. A structured program is required to provide complete information regarding the risk of fertility impairment following cancer treatment and increase the knowledge of these patients to enable them to make a proper decision about fertility preservation.

Knowledge, attitudes, and intentions toward fertility preservation awareness among oncologists in China.

e18537Background: Fertility is a key aspect of quality of life for cancer patients of childbearing age. Some patients may benefit from preserve fertility before treatment. However, the issue of fer...

Portuguese oncologists’ practices regarding female fertility preservation: Which barriers most relate to these practices?

This study aims to investigate the current practice patterns of Portuguese oncologists with different clinical specialties regarding female fertility preservation (FP) and to determine the relative endorsement of different barriers to these practices. A total of 111 doctors with different clinical specialties assisting female cancer patients of childbearing age at Portuguese clinical institutions completed a self-report questionnaire to assess their current practice patterns regarding female FP and their perceptions of the barriers to these practices. Although the majority of the oncologists reported discussing the reproductive future with their patients, 2.8% and 7.2% of these clinicians reported never informing about the risk of infertility and about FP, respectively, and 75.8% of the participants have referred fewer than ten patients to a reproductive medicine doctor. Time with patients was the strongest endorsed barrier to these practices. A stronger endorsement of the barriers "oncologists' communication skills" and "patient-related factors" was related to a lower frequency of informing about both the risk of cancer-related infertility and about FP. It is important to overcome the intrinsic barriers that emerged as being the most relevant to oncologists' FP practices and that can be modified, namely the lack of communication skills and the oncologists' perceptions of their patients' characteristics.

The relationship of osteoporosis with severity of pain dirung the treatment of breast cancer patients of childbearing age

Aim. The analysis of the relationship of osteoporosis with severity of pain and the improvement of the diagnosis of osteoporosis in breast cancer (BC) patients of the reproductive age. Methods. There were examined 60 women, including 30 BC patients at the age from 30 to 50 years and 30 women of similar age as comparison group. The examination included a blood test for osteocalcin, calcitonin, alkaline phosphatase, parathyroid hormone, thyroid stimulating hormone, calcium and phosphorus. The degree ofpain in BC patients was evaluated according to the McGill Pain Questionnaire and classification of pain. Osteodensitometry was made in all BC patients and cases from the comparison group. These 30 BC patients were examined prior to the appointment of specific treatment and a half year after the performed treatment Results. In the analysis of 30 breast cancer patients of childbearing age in 26 patients the onset of artificial menopause occurred. Pain syndrome prior to the treatment of the underlying disease was determined in 20% of cases. 6 months after treatment of BC pain breast cancer was detected in 70% of patients. Artificial menopause is associated with the delivery of chemotherapy and shutdown of ovarian function. Hormone therapy with tamoxifen was prescribed to 16 BC patients, 5 of them were transferred to second-line hormone therapy due to side effects of antiestrogens. At that the menopause is the basic condition for the appointment of aromatase inhibitors. In the examination of the whole group ofpatients in 63,3% of cases were revealed to have osteopenia and osteoporosis. Conclusion The prevalence rate of osteoporosis in BC patients of reproductive age is directly related to the performed specific treatment when the appointment of the therapy of osteoporosis it is necessary in complex treatment of cancer patients for the its prevention

Medical consultations about fertility preservation with haematological patients of childbearing age: A qualitative study

PurposeOncological treatments can cause serious long-term consequences, including effects on patients' fertility. Communication about possible fertility impairment is essential for cancer patients who want to have children. When oncologists initiate this discussion in a timely manner, patients can be referred to fertility specialists and avail themselves of fertility preservation methods. The oncologist plays a key role in this context. Methods30 cancer patients of childbearing age (21–43 years) took part in semi-structured interviews between March 2011 and April 2012 about fertility and their desire to have children. Interview transcripts were thematically analyzed. ResultsPhysician–patient consultations broached the issue as a central theme in almost all patients. A few consultations were patient initiated, and the majority took place before the beginning of treatment. Almost half of the patients were satisfied with their consultations and were referred to a fertility specialist. The ideal setting for these conversations is in the presence of the patient's partner, in a private space, before the beginning of treatment. ConclusionsAll patients should be informed about the possibility of their fertility being impaired due to treatments, even if they have not explicitly expressed wanting children. The oncologist is the first and most important contact for the patient and, hence, should bring up the issue of family planning and fertility. An interdisciplinary communication and collaboration between oncologists and fertility specialists can improve patient care.

Results of surgical treatment of cervical cancer patients of childbearing age

The world marked increase in the incidence of cervical cancer in young women, especially from 29 to 45 years old. Analysis showed that in patients with preserved ovarian function, not only the effectiveness of the treatment, but also the quality of life. It is associated with the acceleration, earlier puberty and the onset of sexual activity. In recent years more and more widely used radical surgery with preservation of the ovaries and the abduction of the radiation castration and preservation of reproductive function. In the National Cancer Research Centre of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Uzbekistan analyzed the results of surgical treatment of 204 patients with cervical cancer younger. Age of patients from 23 to 45 years, that is, in the most hard-working, reproductive period. In our study patients met principally with exophytic – 82 (40.2 %) and 68 (33.3 %) еndophytic growth cervical tumors. Histological in 197 (96.6 %) patients with squamous cervical cancer patients with 7 (3.4%). Adenocarcinoma of cervical cancer. Handard examination of the patient are further adapted to determine the level of sex hormones (estradiol, progesterone), determination of the tumor marter CA-125 levels of calcium and phosphate in the blood. 112 patients from the main group and the combined complex therapy surgical treatment with organ-component (conservation and ovarian transposition). The first group included 112 (55.1 %) patients, who as part of combination therapy was performed and complex surgical treatment of ovarian transposition. The second group included 92 (44.9%) patients who as part of combination therapy and complex surgery performed without ovarian transposition. Each group was divided into 3 subgroup included patients with stage process T1b–2aN0M0. Which performs the combined radiotherapy. The second subgroups included patients with stage process that runs systemic chemotherapy, surgery, combined radiotherapy. The third group included patients with stage process that runs endoarterial regional prolonged chemotherapy + surgery + combined radiotherapy. In phases of dynamic monitoring of patient evaluated the effectiveness of treatment as well as studied T2bN0–1M0 the quality of life of a young body. Quality of life of patient in the dynamics of observation was determined by the American system MENQOL.

Prospective, observational registry of branded imatinib (IM) and nilotinib (NIL) exposure in pregnant women: Voluntary post-authorization safety study.

TPS6638 Background: Family planning decisions for cancer patients of childbearing age are impacted by their diagnosis. IM and NIL are category D drugs (demonstrated risk to the fetus based on mechanism of action and findings in animals; however, the benefits of therapy may outweigh the potential risk to the fetus); women should be advised not to become pregnant when taking these drugs. Limited data exist concerning safety of these drugs during pregnancy and consequences of interrupting treatment. The registry does not recommend patients receiving IM or NIL become pregnant, but serves only to document exposures that occur, and collect information on pregnancy outcome, maternal course of disease, and infant follow-up. Methods: The registry intends to enroll 150 women (≥18 years) treated with branded IM and NIL within 6 mo before or during pregnancy (generic IM and NIL reports are excluded). Schedule of visits and treatment is according to local standard of care. Women are divided into 2 exposure cohorts: 1) pregnancy/fetal: received tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) within 14 d of conception or at any time during pregnancy; 2) interrupted TKI: received TKIs within 6 mo before conception but interrupted TKIs in preparation for/due to pregnancy. To identify signals of teratogenicity, the registry uses a general population baseline rate of birth defects, and the prevalence of defects in cohorts 1 and 2 may be compared. Cases are quantitatively analyzed for the emergence of unique defects or patterns of defects. Primary objective: monitor TKI-exposed pregnancies to estimate the prevalence of birth defects (calculated by dividing number of birth defects by total number of exposed live births from cohort 1). Secondary objectives are to: 1) determine the impact of treatment interruption on maternal disease status; 2) assess and estimate the prevalence of serious adverse pregnancy outcomes; and 3) assess and estimate the prevalence of developmental delays and functional deficits among infants during the first year of life. Maternal disease status is analyzed, comparing disease status at registration, pregnancy outcome, and 1 y after birth, stratified by length of TKI interruption.

The role of radiation oncologists and discussion of fertility preservation in young cancer patients

PurposeThe risk of infertility increases after cancer treatment with chemotherapy, with radiotherapy, and in some cases with surgery. The goal of these secondary analyses was to examine potential differences in practice behaviors, specifically referral and discussion of fertility preservation, among oncologists (ie, surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists). Methods and MaterialsTwo items examining discussion and referral for fertility preservation were administered as part of a larger 53-item survey measuring oncologists’ fertility preservation knowledge, practice behaviors, and attitudes was developed and mailed to a nationally representative, stratified, random sample of US oncology care physicians. ResultsThere was a significant difference by oncology subspecialty in discussion of the impact of treatment on future fertility for cancer patients of childbearing age. Follow-up χ2 tests of discussion and specialty showed 82% of radiation oncologists “always/often” discussed the impact of treatment on fertility, compared with 51% for surgical oncologists. There was not a significant difference between oncology specialty and reported referrals to reproductive endocrinologist with 24% to 31% of all oncologist types reporting “rarely/never” referring patients of child-bearing age to an infertility specialist or reproductive endocrinologist. ConclusionsThese findings are important particularly for radiation oncologists, who may have a unique role in communicating fertility preservation options to their patients given their opportunity for multiple patient encounters. As such, there is a notable opportunity for further research into the reasons why and how to implement provider education about fertility preservation to improve quality of life and quality care for patients of reproductive potential.