Cancer In Renal Transplant Recipients Research Articles

Skin cancer in renal transplant recipients: outcomes from a safety net hospital in Boston.

Renal transplant recipients (RTRs) are prone to skin cancer due to the immunosuppression required to maintain graft function. Existing studies of skin cancer in RTRs focus on patients with Fitzpatrick skin types I-II, with limited documentation of incidence in skin types III-VI. This study seeks to better characterize skin cancers in RTRs with skin types III-VI. Compare the incidence of skin cancer in RTRs of skin types I-II with skin types III-VI. Explore the association between the development of skin cancer and other contributing factors in RTRs of skin types I-VI. Retrospective chart review of RTRs at a single institution between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2022. Patients were followed from the date of transplant to the last clinical follow-up or death. 777 RTRs were included in the study, including 245 patients with Fitzpatrick skin types I-II and 532 with skin types III-VI. A total of 48 patients developed NMSCs, 2 patients developed melanoma, and 3 patients developed Kaposi sarcoma. There is a higher incidence of skin cancer in RTRs with Fitzpatrick skin types III-VI compared to the reported incidence among non-transplant recipients of the same skin types, but the incidence remains considerably lower compared to RTR of skin types I-II.

An analysis of iris pattern as a risk factor for skin cancer development in immunosuppressed renal transplant recipients.

Renal transplant recipients are at increased risk of keratinocyte skin cancers with a tendency to have multiple, aggressive and difficult to treat tumours. The eye and the skin share the same embryological ectoderm. Iris pattern has recently been reported as a predictive risk factor for skin cancer in non-immunosuppressed Southern European (Grigore et al., J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2018, 1662) and Irish populations (Ridge et al., J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2022, e542). To analyse if an individual's iris pattern is an independent risk factor for the development of keratinocyte skin cancers in renal transplant recipients. Iris patterns of 110 renal transplant recipients were evaluated using the Simionescu visual three-step technique (iris periphery, colarette and iris freckling [Simionescu et al., Ann Res Rev Biol, 2014, 2525]). Established risk factors for skin cancer in transplant patients were recorded as confounding factors. Observational cross-sectional study including 110 renal transplant population. Thirty-one participants had skin cancer. In the skin cancer group, iris periphery was blue/grey in 74.3% (p = 0.053, OR 2.5), the colarette was light brown in 57.1% (p < 0.0043) and iris freckles were present in 55%(p = 0.044). Dark brown and blue colarettes were observed in controls. Binary Logistic Regression analysis showed light brown colarette is a significant independent risk factor for skin cancer (OR 4.54, p < 0.02, CI 1.56-10.57). Within this renal transplant population a blue iris periphery, light brown colarette and presence of freckling confers an independent risk for keratinocyte skin cancer. Iris pattern is a useful tool for identification of transplant patients at risk of keratinocyte skin cancer and an easy-to-use technique for risk evaluation in this cohort. This is the first study looking at iris pattern and keratinocyte skin cancer risk in renal transplant population.

Characteristics of lung cancer in renal transplant recipients.

e20592 Background: Renal transplant recipients (RTRs) are at a higher risk of developing malignancies primarily due to prolonged immunosuppression. Lung cancer while rare in RTR, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The primary objective of our study is to analyze the clinical characteristics and outcomes of RTRs who developed lung cancer at our institution. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1998 RTRs who underwent transplantation between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2019, at our institution and identified patients who were diagnosed with lung cancer after transplant. Baseline demographic variables and information related to the renal transplant, the diagnosis and management of lung cancer were collected. Results: Among 1998 RTRs, 10 patients (0.005%) developed lung cancer. A majority of the lung cancer patients identified as male (n = 8), and the median age was 62.5 years. The races of the patients were white (30%, n = 3), African American (50%, n = 5), Hispanic (10%, n = 1), and Native American (10%, n = 1). Concomitant liver transplant was performed in 2 patients, and a concomitant heart transplant was performed in 1 patient. Median time to lung cancer diagnosis after transplant was 67.5 months (range, 12-168). The histology of the lung cancers found were adenocarcinoma (n = 4), squamous (n = 4), and small cell (n = 2). All patients had a history of smoking, with 90% reporting a &gt; 15 pack-year history of smoking and none of them received lung cancer screening. Among the patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 87.5% (n = 7) had early-stage disease, and 12.5% (n = 1) had locally advanced disease (Stage IIIB). Both patients diagnosed with small cell lung cancer had extensive-stage (es-SCLC) disease at the time of diagnosis. Among patients with NSCLC, 2 had genomic tumor profiling performed. Among patients with early-stage NSCLC, 57% underwent upfront surgery, 14% received radiation alone, 14% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 14% received adjuvant chemotherapy. Around 71% (n = 5) remained alive at the last follow up recorded. The patient with stage IIIB NSCLC received chemotherapy and concomitant radiation but had an overall survival (OS) of only 6 months; that patient died of complications related to cancer progression. Both patients with es-SCLC received front-line chemotherapy with carboplatin and etoposide. To our knowledge, 40% (n = 4) of these patients retained their renal graft function. At 1-year from diagnosis, 40% of patients diagnosed with lung cancer were still alive. Conclusions: Lung cancer in RTRs is rare but is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. With the improving life expectancy of RTRs, the incidence of de novo malignancies including lung cancer is likely to increase. Annual screening for lung cancer in high-risk individuals is an important step for early diagnosis. Surgical resection and chemotherapy are well tolerated in patients with lung cancer.

De novo prostate cancer in renal transplant recipients: A single-center study.

326 Background: Renal transplant recipients (RTRs) are at an increased risk of developing solid organ malignancies. Given improved allograft survival and life expectancy, the incidence of prostate cancer (PC) in RTRs appears to be increasing. Previous studies have reported the incidence of PC among RTRs to be between 0.3% and 3.24%. Limited data is available on the clinical characteristics, treatment, predictive markers, and outcomes of PC in RTRs. Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective study of male RTRs who developed PC. We collected the following data on RTRs who underwent transplantation between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2019: baseline demographics, cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), duration of dialysis prior to RT, type of RT (cadaveric vs. living donor), immunosuppressive regimen, interval from RT to diagnosis of PC, stage of PC, type of treatment received, allograft survival, and overall survival (OS) were collected. Results: Among 1093 male RTRs, 15 (1.37%) developed PC. The median age at diagnosis of PC was 60 (range, 49-75) years. Subject races were African American (n=7), Hispanic (n=3), White (n=3), and other (n=2). The median duration from transplant to diagnosis of PC was 72 (range, 12-156) months. PC was diagnosed at stage I in 13 patients, stage II in 1 patient, and stage IV in 1 patient. The management of these patients consisted of local radiation (LR) alone in 6 patients, LR with leuprolide therapy in 6 patients, and radical prostatectomy alone in 1 patient. The patient with stage IV PC was treated with leuprolide and abiraterone acetate and remains progression free at follow-up of 41 months. The 5-year OS for this cohort of patients was 73.3%. Allograft function was preserved in 13 patients 12 months after diagnosis of PC. No PC-related mortality was noted. Conclusions: The incidence of PC in our analysis appears to be consistent with prior published studies. Most of our RTRs with PC had early-stage disease with excellent 5-year survival. The current standard-of-care treatment modalities for PC appear to be effective in the management of these patients. Allograft function was preserved in the majority of RTRs with PC in this study. Further research is required to evaluate the predictive factors for developing PC in RTR.

Prostate Cancer in Renal Transplant Recipients: Results from a Large Contemporary Cohort.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the natural history of prostate cancer (PCa) in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) and to clarify the controversy over whether RTRs have a higher risk of PCa and poorer outcomes than non-RTRs, due to factors such as immunosuppression. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective multicenter study of RTRs diagnosed with cM0 PCa between 2001 and 2019. Primary outcomes were overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Secondary outcomes included biochemical recurrence and/or progression after active surveillance (AS) and evaluation of variables possibly influencing PCa aggressiveness and outcomes. Management modalities included surgery, radiation, cryotherapy, HIFU, AS, and watchful waiting. Results: We included 166 men from nine institutions. Median age and eGFR at diagnosis were 67 (IQR 60−73) and 45.9 mL/min (IQR 31.5−63.4). ASA score was >2 in 58.4% of cases. Median time from transplant to PCa diagnosis was 117 months (IQR 48−191.5), and median PSA at diagnosis was 6.5 ng/mL (IQR 5.02−10). The biopsy Gleason score was ≥8 in 12.8%; 11.6% and 6.1% patients had suspicion of ≥cT3 > cT2 and cN+ disease. The most frequent management method was radical prostatectomy (65.6%), followed by radiation therapy (16.9%) and AS (10.2%). At a median follow-up of 60.5 months (IQR 31−106) 22.9% of men (n = 38) died, with only n = 4 (2.4%) deaths due to PCa. Local and systemic progression rates were 4.2% and 3.0%. On univariable analysis, no major influence of immunosuppression type was noted, with the exception of a protective effect of antiproliferative agents (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.16−0.97, p = 0.04) associated with a decreased risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) or progression after AS. Conclusion: PCa diagnosed in RTRs is mainly of low to intermediate risk and organ-confined at diagnosis, with good cancer control and low PCa death at intermediate follow-up. RTRs have a non-negligible risk of death from causes other than PCa. Aggressive upfront management of the majority of RTRs with PCa may, therefore, be avoided.

Robotic Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer in Renal Transplant Recipients: Results from a Multicenter Series

BackgroundDespite an expected increase in prostate cancer (PCa) incidence in the renal transplant recipient (RTR) population in the near future, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in these patients has been poorly detailed. It is not well understood whether results are comparable to RARP in the non-RTR setting. ObjectiveTo describe the surgical technique for RARP in RTR and report results from our multi-institutional experience. Design, setting, and participantsThis was a retrospective review of the experience of four referral centers. Surgical procedureTransperitoneal RARP with pelvic lymph node dissection in selected patients. MeasurementsWe measured patient, PCa, and graft baseline features; intraoperative and postoperative parameters; complications, (Clavien classification); and oncological and functional outcomes. Results and limitationsWe included 41 men. The median age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, preoperative renal function, and prostate-specific antigen were 60 yr (interquartile range [IQR] 57–64), 2 points (IQR 2–3), 45 ml/min (IQR 30–62), and 6.5 ng/ml (IQR 5.2–10.2), respectively. Four men (9.8%) had a biopsy Gleason score >7. The majority of the patients (70.7%) did not undergo lymphadenectomy. The median operating time, hospital stay, and catheterization time were 201 min (IQR 170–250), 4 d (IQR 2–6), and 10 d (IQR 7–13), respectively. At final pathology, 11 men had extraprostatic extension and seven had positive surgical margins. At median follow-up of 42 mo (IQR 24–65), four men had biochemical recurrence, including one case of local PCa persistence and one local recurrence. No metastases were recorded while two patients died from non–PCa-related causes. Continence was preserved in 86.1% (p not applicable) and erections in 64.7% (p = 0.0633) of those who were continent/potent before the procedure. Renal function remained unchanged (p = 0.08). No intraoperative complications and one major (Clavien 3a) complication were recorded. ConclusionsRARP in RTR is safe and feasible. Overall, operative, oncological, and functional outcomes are comparable to those described for the non-RTR setting, with graft injury remaining undescribed. Further research is needed to confirm our findings. Patient summaryRobot-assisted removal of the prostate is safe and feasible in patients who have a kidney transplant. Cancer control, urinary and sexual function results, and surgical complications seem to be similar to those for patients without a transplant, but further research is needed.

V43 - Robotic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer in renal transplant recipients: Results from a multicenter series

V43 - Robotic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer in renal transplant recipients: Results from a multicenter series

Prostate Cancer Characteristics in Renal Transplant Recipients: A 25-Year Experience From a Single Centre

Objectives: The incidence of prostate cancer in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) is increasing, but few data are available in the literature. In this study, we reviewed the 25-year experience in the management of prostate cancer after kidney transplantation at the Florence Transplant Centre.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data from 617 RTR male patients who underwent renal transplantation at our institute between July 1996 and September 2016. Data regarding demographics, renal transplantation, prostate cancer and immunosuppressive treatment were analyzed. The probability of death was estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and differences between patients' groups were assessed by the log-rank test.Results: From July 1991 to September 2016, 617 kidney transplantations of male patients were performed at our institute. Among these, 20 patients were subsequently diagnosed with prostate cancer accounting for a cumulative incidence of 3.24%. After a median follow-up of 59 months, 10 patients underwent radical prostatectomy whereas 10 patients underwent primary radiotherapy. A biochemical recurrence was identified in five (25%) patients while a fatal event occurred in 11 (55%) patients. Univariate Cox regression showed that the basal value of PSA >10 ng/ml was the only significant factor negatively affecting the survival of patients.Conclusions: Standard treatments can be proposed to RTR with satisfactory results on both post-operative and oncological outcomes. Further studies are needed to address the issue of prostate cancer screening based on PSA levels and the optimal management of prostate cancer in RTRs.

Radical prostatectomy outcomes in renal transplant recipients: a retrospective case series of Thai patients

BackgroundThe incidence of prostate cancer in renal transplant recipients (RTR) is similar to the general population. Radical prostatectomy (RP) is the standard of care in the management of clinically localized cancer, but is considered complicated due to the presence of adhesions, and the location of transplanted ureter/kidney. To date, a few case series or studies on RP in RTR have been published, especially in Asian patients. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety and report the experience with RP on RTR.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed data of 1270 patients who underwent RP from January 2008 to March 2020, of which 5 patients were RTR. All available baseline characteristics, perioperative and postoperative data (operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), complications, length of hospital stay, complication), pathological stage, Gleason score, surgical margin status, and pre/postoperative creatinine were reviewed.ResultsOf the 5 RTR who underwent RPs (1 open radical prostatectomy (ORP), 1 laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP), 2 robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies (RALRP), and 1 Retzius-sparing RALRP (RS-RALRP)) prostatectomy, the mean age (± SD) was 70 (± 5.62) years. In LRP and RALRP cases, the standard ports were moved slightly medially to prevent graft injury. The mean operative time ranged from 190 to 365 min. The longest operative time and highest EBL (630 ml) was the ORP case due to severe adhesion in Retzius space. For LRP and RALRP cases, the operative times seemed comparable and had EBL of ≤ 300 ml. All RPs were successful without any major intra-operative complication. There was no significant change in graft function. The restorations of urinary continence were within 1 month in RS-RALRP, approximately 6 months in RALRP, and about 1 year in ORP and LRP. Three patients with positive surgical margins had prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence at the first follow-up and 1 had later PSA recurrence. Two patients with negative margins were free from biochemical recurrence at 47 and 3 months after their RP.ConclusionsOur series suggested that all RP techniques are safe and feasible mode of treatment for localized prostate cancer in RTR.

P0345 - Prostate cancer in renal transplant recipients: Results from a large multicentre contemporary cohort

P0345 - Prostate cancer in renal transplant recipients: Results from a large multicentre contemporary cohort

Parotid metastases of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in renal transplant recipients: Case series and literature review.

Cutaneous squamous cell skin carcinoma (cSCC) is the most common skin cancer in renal transplant recipients (RTR). Metastatic potential of cSCC is significantly higher in RTR than in the general population. Parotid metastases (PM) of cSCC are rare, but their prognosis is poor. The present study aimed to investigate the frequency and characteristics of PM of cSCC in our renal transplant cohort. Among 1610 patients who received kidney allografts at our institution in the period from January 1999 to December 2019, 84 patients (5.2%) developed at least one cSCC. Three patients were identified to develop PM within 3 to 6 months after the occurrence of primary cSCC. All PM were discovered by clinical examination and in an advanced stage. Two of them died early after the diagnosis of PMs (after 4 months and 1 year, respectively). In conclusion, immunosuppression is one of the major risk factors for the development of cSCC and its metastases. It contributes to the poor survival of patients with PMs of the cSCC. Our experience emphasizes the need for the employment of the radiological tests in patients with primary high-risk cSCC to evaluate nonpalpable lymph node involvement.

S2942 Rare Case of Primary Gastric Small Cell Carcinoma in a Renal Transplant Recipient

INTRODUCTION: Small cell carcinoma is a rapidly progressive, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine cancer that most often originates in the lungs; however, an estimated 2.5-5% of cases originate elsewhere. Extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma (ESCC) arising from the stomach is rare. Cases occurring in renal transplant recipients are even more uncommon. Here we present a case of metastatic ESCC from a gastric primary in a renal transplant recipient. CASE DESCRIPTION/METHODS: A 52-year-old Vietnamese male presented with 1 week of epigastric pain. He had a history two renal transplantations requiring multiple thymoglobulin inductions and long-term immunosuppression. Vital signs were normal. Physical exam revealed hepatomegaly. Labs were significant for Hgb 10.0 g/dL, ALP 155 U/L, AST 71 U/L, ALT 21 U/L. CT scan of the abdomen revealed hepatomegaly, innumerable hepatic masses up to 9 cm in diameter, retroperitoneal and portal lymphadenopathy and splenic and portal varices. MRI of the abdomen revealed suspicious circumferential gastric antral wall thickening up to 2.4 cm with adjacent nodularity (Figure A). Liver core biopsy was diagnostic for metastatic small cell carcinoma. Subsequent EGD revealed a large circumferential, infiltrative, fungating and ulcerated mass in the gastric antrum (Figure B) with biopsy confirming the diagnosis of primary gastric small cell carcinoma (GSCC). The patient completed 4 cycles of palliative chemotherapy and transitioned to hospice due to lack of significant response and severe neutropenic complications. DISCUSSION: Primary GSCC are rare, representing 0.1% of extrapulmonary small cell cancers and < 0.1% of all gastric cancers. These often present with early, widespread metastasis with a 5-year survival rate of 13-20%. An increased risk of de novo cancer and gastric cancers in renal transplant recipients has been well-described, however the overwhelming majority presenting as gastric adenocarcinomas. Extrapulmonary small cell carcinomas in renal transplant patients are also rare with most cases arising from genitourinary primaries, often from the donor kidney. There are reported cases of gastrointestinal primaries from the rectum, appendix, and duodenum. To our knowledge, this represents the first reported case of metastatic GSCC in a renal transplant patient that sheds a light on the association between immunosuppression and cancer risk. The absence of well-established epidemiological data, prognostic factors and treatment guidelines necessitates reporting these rare GSCC cases.Figure 1.: Hepatic masses with 2.4cm circumferential gastric antral wall thickening (red arrow).Figure 2.: Gastric antral mass.

De-Novo Genitourinary Neoplasms in Transplant Recipients: The Present and Future

The risk of genitourinary cancers following transplantation is increased following majority of solid organ transplants but is best described following renal transplantation. Increasing average age of the transplant recipient as well as increases in post- transplant survival increases the risk of these malignancies. The risk of Kidney cancer is the highest following most solid organ transplants, whereas prostate cancer risk is lower than the general population in multiple large population-based studies. The etiology of increased risk of cancer following transplant is multifactorial with the predominant influence of immunosuppression and direct toxicity of immunosuppressants, however, the significance of end stage disease particularly in the causation of renal cancer in renal transplant recipients is undeniable. Modifications in immunosuppression regimens as well as changes in the standard treatment principles of some cancers may require changes in the management of some post-transplant malignancies. Standard screening guidelines have not been established but screening for renal tumors in renal transplant recipients is the only widely studied entity. Further work is needed to prepare the urologic oncological community with this once rare population group and standardized recommendations need to be established for screening and for the use of new age cancer therapeutics like immunotherapy.

THYROID DISORDERS PREVALENCE IN A COHORT OF KIDNEY TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS.

As the life expectancy prolongs, malignancy has become an important issue in renal transplant recipients (RTRs). Thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine malignancy with ongoing increase in incidence all over the world. This is a cross-sectional study that investigates the thyroid disorders and the prevalence of thyroid nodule and cancer in RTRs. 204 RTRs were evaluated for the thyroid diseases with ultrasonography, serum thyroid stimulating hormone, free T4, free T3 levels, anti-thyroglobulin antibody and anti-thyroid peroxidase antibody levels; FNAB was carried if required. 191 patients (94.1%) had normal thyroid function. Subclinical hypothyroidism was diagnosed in 11 patients, subclinical hyperthyroidism in 1 patient and low T3 syndrome in 4 patients. The FNAB was performed in 17 (27.9%) from 61 patients with thyroid nodule. The cytological examination of biopsy materials revealed that 2 (11.8%) nodules were suspicious for malignancy, 13 (76.5%) were benign, and 2 (11.8%) with non diagnostic cytology. Thyroid cancer prevalence was 0.2% in Turkey but we detected that 0.98% of RTRs had thyroid cancer. Screening the RTRs for thyroid disorders is necessary, so that early diagnosis and appropriate treatment of thyroid disease and cancer may improve the quality of life.

Human papillomavirus-related anogenital premalignancies and cancer in renal transplant recipients: A Danish nationwide, registry-based cohort study.

In this registry-based cohort study, we estimated the risk of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related anogenital premalignancies and cancer in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) compared to a nontransplanted comparison cohort. We identified all first-time RTRs in Denmark during 1990-2015 in a nationwide nephrology register. For each RTR, we randomly selected 50 age- and sex-matched non-RTRs from the background population. The study population was followed for diagnoses of cervical, vaginal, vulvar, penile and anal intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2-3 (IN2/3) and cancer for up to 27 years. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) of anogenital IN2/3 and cancer in RTRs vs. non-RTRs by Cox regression separately for men and women using age as underlying timescale, adjusting for income, education, HPV vaccination and immunocompromising conditions. We included 4,261 RTRs and 213,673 non-RTRs. RTRs had increased hazard of cervical (HR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.7-2.8), vaginal (HR = 35.0, 95% CI: 13.9-87.7), vulvar (HR = 16.4, 95% CI: 10.4-25.8), penile (HR = 21.9, 95% CI: 11.1-43.5) and anal (women: HR = 51.1, 95% CI: 28.0-93.1; men: HR = 39.0, 95% CI: 16.7-91.1) IN2/3. The HRs of anogenital cancers were also increased at most sites. The HR of anogenital IN2/3 in female RTRs tended to be higher during graft function than during dialysis. In female RTRs aged <40 years at transplantation, 10-15% had cervical IN2/3 and 5-12% had vaginal/vulvar/anal IN2/3 within 20 years after transplantation, compared to 4-8 and 0.2-0.4%, respectively, of female non-RTRs. In conclusion, RTRs had substantially higher risk of HPV-related anogenital premalignancies and cancer than non-RTRs.

HLA alleles in renal transplant recipients with nonmelanoma skin cancer in southeastern Brazil

AbstractBackground: Renal transplant recipients are submitted to immunosuppression to avoid graft rejection, which makes them susceptible to various conditions. Furthermore, these individuals present malignant tumors more frequently than the general population, including nonmelanoma skin cancer. The individual genetic basis that acts in the pathogenesis of cutaneous cancer may present a protection or susceptibility factor for disease development. One of these factors is the HLA complex.Objective: To investigate HLA alleles association to the occurrence of nonmelanoma skin cancer in renal transplant recipients from Sao Paulo State.Methods: A total of 213 patients (93 renal transplant recipients with nonmelanoma skin cancer and 120 renal transplant recipients without nonmelanoma skin cancer) were evaluated by retrospective and cross-sectional study. Epidemiological, clinical and HLA typing data were found in databases. HLA class I (A, B) and class II (DR) alleles were compared to establish their association with nonmelanoma skin cancer.Results: Comparing renal transplant recipients with and without nonmelanoma skin cancer, the HLA-B*13 allele was associated with higher risk of developing nonmelanoma skin cancer while B*45 and B*50 alleles were associated with protection.Study limitations: The HLA A, B and DR alleles identification for the kidney transplantation routine is done by low and medium resolution techniques that do not allow discrimination of specific alleles.Conclusion: The involvement of HLA alleles in nonmelanoma skin cancer in renal transplant recipients was confirmed in this study. Renal transplant recipients with HLA-B*13 showed higher risk for developing a skin cancer (OR= 7.29) and should be monitored for a long period of time after transplantation.

Cancer risk after renal transplantation in South Korea: a nationwide population-based study

BackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate patterns of posttransplant malignancies among renal transplant recipients (RTRs) in South Korea using nationwide data.MethodsThe nationwide cohort assessed in this study included RTRs from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2014. We analyzed cancer incidence during the time course after renal transplantation. Additionally, we calculated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) to evaluate the risk of malignancies in RTRs.ResultsA total of 1343 RTRs (871 males and 472 females, mean age 48.5 ± 11.6 years) were assessed. Among them, 104 (7.7%) developed malignancies after transplantation, most commonly in the thyroid cancer (23.1%). The SIR for all cancers was 3.54; particularly, the SIRs for renal cancer, myeloma, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma were 16.31, 24.02, and 28.64, respectively. Females showed a higher risk of malignancy than males (SIRs: 4.04 for women and 3.26 for men). The median interval between transplantation and malignancy diagnosis was 27.2 months (range 12.3–54.8 months).ConclusionsRTRs in South Korea demonstrated a high risk of malignancy after transplantation compared with the general population. This indicates that close surveillance and routine screening for cancer in RTRs are needed.

Radiotherapy of prostate cancer in renal transplant recipients: single-center experience.

This study analyzed the long-term outcomes of localized prostate cancer in renal transplant recipients after radiotherapy treatment - mainly brachytherapy. We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of renal transplant recipients between 2003 and 2016 at a single tertiary center, and identified four patients with high serum PSA level during regular follow-up, 1-108 months after primary renal transplantation. The mean age of patients with detected high serum PSA level with 9.25µg/l median was 59.05 years. All four patients had functioning grafts. To prove prostate cancer, they underwent trans-rectal prostate biopsy, with no complications. Histological evaluation identified prostate adenocarcinoma (Gleason 6-7, stage T1-2cN0M0) in three patients. The biopsy in the fourth patient was negative and he therefore had trans-urethral prostate resection. Histological evaluation of resected prostate tissue revealed prostate adenocarcinoma (Gleason 7, 4+3). All patients began treatment with androgen deprivation therapy. Three patients were indicated for permanent prostate brachytherapy (BT) with iodine-125 (125I) seeds and the trans-urethral resection patient was referred for external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). After a mean follow-up of 49 months (range, 30-73), all patients, irrespective of type of radiotherapy, were in complete clinical and biochemical remission, with undetectable PSA levels. The kidney grafts remained functional, with a mean creatinine level of 99 µmol/l (range 64-123) and a glomerular filtration rate of 1.17 ml/s/1.73 m2 (range, 0.89-1.59). Radiation-induced late adverse effects were reported in two BT patients; one had clinically significant urine incontinency and the other suffered urethral stricture. Localized prostate tumor was identified in all reported patients, and all received radiotherapy plus androgen deprivation. All patients were disease-free at the time of the last follow-up. Therefore, combined BT and twelve months androgen deprivation appears both safe and effective for patients with prostate cancer after kidney transplantation.

Safety and Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Kidney Transplant Patients: A Systematic Review.

To evaluate the safety and outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) based on available literature. A literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science through "robot" AND "prostatectomy" AND "transplant." Three authors separately reviewed the records to select the relevant articles with any discrepancies solved by open discussion. Patient age, prostate-specific antigen, Gleason score, and tumor stage were recorded as well as intraoperative and postoperative complications, length of stay, surgical margin status, and disease recurrence, if provided. The operative techniques and modification/adjustments to standard port placements were also reviewed. We also include our case report in this review. We retrieved 10 articles reporting clinical data on RARP for kidney transplant patients, including 5 case series (level 4) and 5 case reports (level 4). A total of 35 kidney transplant recipients undergoing RARP were analyzed in this systematic review, one case in our institution included. None of the cases had major technical difficulties precluding the operation. Technical modifications to the standard technique were described in 10 of the 11 articles specifically including modifications to port placement (54% of patients), development of the space of Retzius (60% of patients), and performance of lymphadenectomy. Mean operative time was 220 minutes. Perioperative complication rate was 17.1% (6 of 35 patients), with only one Clavien III or greater complication. The rate of positive surgical margins was found to be 31.4%. Data on biochemical recurrence revealed a combined rate of 18.1%. RARP is technically feasible for treating localized prostate cancer in RTRs. Graft function did not deteriorate in any patient. Modifications to the standard technique should be considered specifically for port placement, development of the space of Retzius, and performance of lymphadenectomy. Oncologic outcomes remain difficult to interpret given the small number of reported cases.

Low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer in renal transplant recipients

PURPOSEProstate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy among men and one of the most common neoplasms affecting renal transplant recipients (RTRs). The available treatments for localized PCa among the general population (GP), surgery and external beam radiotherapy, carry a risk of damage to the transplanted kidney, the ureters, and the bladder and therefore tend to be avoided by most groups. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and feasibility of low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) for PCa in RTRs. METHODS AND MATERIALSWe carried out a retrospective review on all RTRs diagnosed of PCa who had undergone LDR-BT at our institution between 2000 and 2015. Nine patients met these criteria, but 1 did not fulfill the followup. Hence, we analyzed 8 patients. We reviewed all clinical data for PCa and graft function in these patients and compared the results with the GP. ResultsMean baseline prostate-specific antigen was 6.8 ± 1.9 ng/mL. All PCa had a Gleason score of 6 and were classified as low risk according the Europe Association of Urology guidelines. Mean followup after seed implantation was 48 ± 12.8 months. All 8 patients remain free of prostate-specific antigen failure. Five-year progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival rates were 100%, 100%, and 62.5%. There was no specific toxicity associated with LDR-BT, and there were no acute adverse events affecting the graft. ConclusionsLDR-BT is a feasible and acceptable treatment for localized PCa in RTRs. Oncological outcomes are similar to the GP, and there is minimal toxicity to the renal graft.