Hypomethylation In Cancer Research Articles

DNA hypomethylator phenotype reprograms glutamatergic network in receptor tyrosine kinase gene-mutated glioblastoma

DNA methylation is crucial for chromatin structure and gene expression and its aberrancies, including the global “hypomethylator phenotype”, are associated with cancer. Here we show that an underlying mechanism for this phenotype in the large proportion of the highly lethal brain tumor glioblastoma (GBM) carrying receptor tyrosine kinase gene mutations, involves the mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 2 (mTORC2), that is critical for growth factor signaling. In this scenario, mTORC2 suppresses the expression of the de novo DNA methyltransferase (DNMT3A) thereby inducing genome-wide DNA hypomethylation. Mechanistically, mTORC2 facilitates a redistribution of EZH2 histone methyltransferase into the promoter region of DNMT3A, and epigenetically represses the expression of DNA methyltransferase. Integrated analyses in both orthotopic mouse models and clinical GBM samples indicate that the DNA hypomethylator phenotype consistently reprograms a glutamate metabolism network, eventually driving GBM cell invasion and survival. These results nominate mTORC2 as a novel regulator of DNA hypomethylation in cancer and an exploitable target against cancer-promoting epigenetics.

Potential biomarkers: The hypomethylation of cg18949415 and cg22193385 sites in colon adenocarcinoma

Overall cancer hypomethylation had been identified in the past, but it is not clear exactly which hypomethylation site is the more important for the occurrence of cancer. To identify key hypomethylation sites, we studied the effect of hypomethylation in twelve regions on gene expression in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD). The key DNA methylation sites of cg18949415, cg22193385 and important genes of C6orf223, KRT7 were found by constructing a prognostic model, survival analysis and random combination prediction a series of in-depth systematic calculations and analyses, and the results were validated by GEO database, immune microenvironment, drug and functional enrichment analysis. Based on the expression values of C6orf223, KRT7 genes and the DNA methylation values of cg18949415, cg22193385 sites, the least diversity increment algorithm were used to predict COAD and normal sample. The 100 % reliability and 97.12 % correctness of predicting tumor samples were obtained in jackknife test. Moreover, we found that C6orf223 gene, cg18949415 site play a more important role than KRT7 gene, cg22193385 site in COAD. In addition, we investigate the impact of key methylation sites on three-dimensional chromatin structure. Our results will be help for experimental studies and may be an epigenetic biomarker for COAD.

Abstract A042: Targeting vulnerabilities arising from global DNA hypomethylation in cancer

Abstract Background: DNA methylation alterations are a universal feature of cancer. In addition to site specific gain of DNA methylation (hypermethylation), a global loss of methylation (hypomethylation) was noted in most cancer genomes. Whereas numerous studies have focused on the role of hypermethylation in disease progression, less is known about the biology of hypomethylation in cancer. Recently, we have identified tumors across all major cancer types that are characterized by severe loss of DNA methylation. Our preliminary data suggest that these DNA hypomethylated cancers (hereafter DHMCs) show distinct alterations influencing gene expression and tumor microenvironment composition. Objective: We hypothesize that since DNA methylation is critical for genome organization and gene expression. Severe global hypomethylation is likely to result in distinct epigenomic and genomic alterations. We therefore investigate common molecular changes associated with DNA hypomethylation to develop novel therapeutic approaches targeting unique vulnerabilities arising in DHMCs. Study design: To delineate the biology of DHMCs, we determined methylation changes with validated orthogonal methods in large representative cohorts of patient samples (The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), University of Washington rapid autopsy cohorts), patient derived xenografts and cancer cell lines. We assessed the patterns of common molecular alterations by performing genome wide epigenome mapping experiments and by defining common driver gene events in DHMCs. We further determined tumor cell intrinsic therapeutic vulnerabilities in broad pharmacologic and CRISPR-Cas9 genomic screens. Results: We observed that DNA hypomethylation is a relatively common feature of solid tumors affecting overall 15-20% of all cancers, with highest rates observed in urothelial, melanoma, hepatocellular and lung and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. In in vivo tumor models of DHMCs, we observe distinct shifts in epigenetic states upon DNA hypomethylation. Most notably, we found that DHMCs are characterized by unique intrinsic drug sensitivities to drug classes affecting core histone levels. Impact: This is the first study to show druggable vulnerabilities arising from DNA hypomethylation. Collectively, these studies define a novel epigenetic subtype of cancer, determine its clinical and molecular features, and pave the way for new targeted therapies. Citation Format: Pallabi Mustafi, Brian Hanratty, Ilsa Coleman, Radhika Patel, Adil Mohamed, Jay Sarthy, Gavin Ha, Michael Haffner. Targeting vulnerabilities arising from global DNA hypomethylation in cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2023 Oct 11-15; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2023;22(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A042.

The genome-wide mutational consequences of DNA hypomethylation

DNA methylation is important for establishing and maintaining cell identity and for genomic stability. This is achieved by regulating the accessibility of regulatory and transcriptional elements and the compaction of subtelomeric, centromeric, and other inactive genomic regions. Carcinogenesis is accompanied by a global loss in DNA methylation, which facilitates the transformation of cells. Cancer hypomethylation may also cause genomic instability, for example through interference with the protective function of telomeres and centromeres. However, understanding the role(s) of hypomethylation in tumor evolution is incomplete because the precise mutational consequences of global hypomethylation have thus far not been systematically assessed. Here we made genome-wide inventories of all possible genetic variation that accumulates in single cells upon the long-term global hypomethylation by CRISPR interference-mediated conditional knockdown of DNMT1. Depletion of DNMT1 resulted in a genomewide reduction in DNA methylation. The degree of DNA methylation loss was similar to that observed in many cancer types. Hypomethylated cells showed reduced proliferation rates, increased transcription of genes, reactivation of the inactive X-chromosome and abnormal nuclear morphologies. Prolonged hypomethylation was accompanied by increased chromosomal instability. However, there was no increase in mutational burden, enrichment for certain mutational signatures or accumulation of structural variation to the genome. In conclusion, the primary consequence of hypomethylation is genomic instability, which in cancer leads to increased tumor heterogeneity and thereby fuels cancer evolution.

Development of a Standard Control for qMSP to Analyze the Methylation Status of LINE-1

Cancer screening is an important aspect of comprehensive health care, making a significant contribution to reducing the risk of death and the cost of treating patients. Finding new tumor markers with high sensitivity and specificity is a trend in the research activities in Vietnam as well as all over the world. Long interspersed element-1 (LINE-1), a large proportion of repeating DNA, is transposable to different positions in the genome. LINE-1 activity is controlled through DNA methylation (the CpG is attached with CH3), whereby LINE-1 is highly methylated in normal cells. However, in some types of cancer such as lung, breast, stomach, liver, rectum... changes in the methylation status LINE-1 have been noticed. To study the methylation status of the LINE-1 sequence, we used a quantitative methyl-specific PCR technique. This method requires a standard calibrator to quantify the rate of methylation. From the commercial methylated DNA (CpG Methylated Human Genomic DNA, Promega), we cloned two regions of the LINE-1 promoter corresponding to a reference sequence and an investigated one (target sequence) which are bisulfite transformed. As a result, we have created two recombinant plasmids, pRef-LINE1 and pMe-LINE1. The plasmids were mixed at 10% of methylation and could be used as a standard control for analyzing the DNA methylation of specimens from patients.
 Keywords: DNA methylation, DNA repeating sequence, LINE-1, quantitative methyl-specific-PCR (qMSP), tumor markers.
 References
 [1] A. P. Feinberg, Phenotypic Plasticity and the Epigenetics of Human Disease, Nature, Vol. 447, No. 7143, 2007, pp. 433-40, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05919.[2] A. H. Ting, K. M. McGarvey, S. B. Baylin, The cancer Epigenome-Components and Functional Correlates, Genes Dev, Vol. 20, No. 23, 2006, pp. 3215-31, https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1464906.[3] A. E. Teschendorff et al., DNA Methylation Outliers in Normal Breast Tissue Identify Field Defects that are Enriched in Cancer, Nat Commun, Vol. 7, No., 2016, pp. 10478, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10478.[4] C. Leygo et al., DNA Methylation as a Noninvasive Epigenetic Biomarker for the Detection of Cancer, Dis Markers, Vol. 2017, No., 2017, pp. 3726595, https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3726595.[5] X. Hao et al., DNA Methylation Markers for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Common Cancers, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, Vol. 114, No. 28, 2017, pp. 7414-7419, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1703577114.[6] N. Kitkumthorn, A. Mutirangura, Long Interspersed Nuclear Element-1 Hypomethylation in Cancer: Biology and Clinical Applications, Clin Epigenetics, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2011, pp. 315-30, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13148-011-0032-8.[7] M. A. Kerachian, M. Kerachian, Long Interspersed Nucleotide Element-1 (LINE-1) Methylation in Colorectal Cancer, Clin Chim Acta, Vol. 488, No., 2019, pp. 209-214, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2018.11.018.[8] M. Barchitta et al., LINE-1 Hypermethylation in White Blood Cell DNA Is Associated with High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, BMC Cancer, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2017, pp. 601, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3582-0.[9] Y. Baba et al., Long Interspersed Element-1 Methylation Level as a Prognostic Biomarker in Gastrointestinal Cancers, Digestion, Vol. 97, No. 1, 2018, pp. 26-30, https://doi.org/10.1159/000484104.[10] J. G. Herman et al., Methylation-specific PCR: a Novel PCR Assay for Methylation Status of Cpg Islands, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, Vol. 93, No. 18, 1996, pp. 9821-9826, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.18.9821.[11] K. Hattermann et al., A Methylation-Specific And SYBR-Green-Based Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Technique for O6-Methylguanine DNA Methyltransferase Promoter Methylation Analysis, Anal Biochem, Vol. 377, No. 1, 2008, pp. 62-71, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2008.03.014. [12] K. J. Livak, T. D. Schmittgen, Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method, Methods, Vol. 25, No. 4, 2001, pp. 402-408, https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262.[13] Y. Hou et al., Serious Overestimation In Quantitative PCR By Circular (Supercoiled) Plasmid Standard: Microalgal Pcna As The Model Gene, PLoS One, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2010, pp. e9545, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009545.[14] G. Johnson, T. Nolan, S. A. Bustin, Real-time Quantitative PCR, Pathogen Detection and MIQE, Methods Mol Biol, Vol. 943, 2013, pp. 1-16, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-353-4_1.

LINE-1 Methylation Analysis in Mesenchymal Stem Cells Treated with Osteosarcoma-Derived Extracellular Vesicles.

Methylation-specific probe amplification (MSPA) is a simple and robust technique that can be used to detect relative differences in methylation levels of DNA samples. It is resourceful, requires small amounts of DNA, and takes around 4-5 h of hands-on work. In the presented technique, DNA samples are first denatured then hybridized to probes that target DNA at either methylated or reference sites as a control. Hybridized DNA is separated into parallel reactions, one undergoing only ligation and the other undergoing ligation followed by HhaI-mediated digestion at unmethylated GCGC sequences. The resultant DNA fragments are amplified by PCR and separated by capillary electrophoresis. Methylated GCGC sites are not digested by HhaI and produce peak signals, while unmethylated GCGC sites are digested and no peak signals are generated. Comparing the control-normalized peaks of digested and undigested versions of each sample provides the methylation dosage ratio of a DNA sample. Here, MSPA is used to detect the effects of osteosarcoma-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) on the methylation status of long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1) in mesenchymal stem cells. LINE-1s are repetitive DNA elements that typically undergo hypomethylation in cancer and, in this capacity, may serve as a biomarker. Ultracentrifugation is also used as a cost-effective method to separate extracellular vesicles from biological fluids (i.e., when preparing EV-depleted fetal bovine serum [FBS] and isolating EVs from osteosarcoma conditioned media [differential centrifugation]). For methylation analysis, custom LINE-1 probes are designed to target three methylation sites in the LINE-1 promoter sequence and seven control sites. This protocol demonstrates the use of MSPA for LINE-1 methylation analysis and describes the preparation of EV-depleted FBS by ultracentrifugation.

TET1 promotes 5hmC-dependent stemness, and inhibits a 5hmC-independent epithelial-mesenchymal transition, in cervical precancerous lesions

DNA hypermethylation is a driving force in carcinogenesis. However, the role of active DNA hypomethylation in cancer remains largely unknown. This process, facilitated by ten-eleven translocation methylcytosine dioxygenase 1 (TET1), which oxidizes 5-methylcytosine (5 mC) to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC), has never been studied in cervical cancer. Here, we found that TET1 and 5hmC correlative increases from normal cervix to Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), maximizing in High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), and decreasing in invasive cancer. Full-length HPV-immortalized HSIL cells demonstrated higher TET1/5hmC levels, and stemness properties, compared to invasive cancer cells. TET1 silencing promoted the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), to transform precancerous cells in vivo. TET1 increased 5hmC in the ZEB1 and VIM promoters, surprisingly, silencing both genes. TET1 interaction with the histone modifiers, LSD1 and EZH2, on the ZEB1 promoter, resulted in gene silencing, via loss of histone H3K4 trimethylation, and gain of histone H3K27 trimethylation. Taken together, TET1 promotes stemness properties, and inhibits EMT, in HSIL cells, through 5hmC-dependent and -independent mechanisms.

TET1-Mediated Hypomethylation Activates Oncogenic Signaling in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Both gains and losses of DNA methylation are common in cancer, but the factors controlling this balance of methylation remain unclear. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a subtype that does not overexpress hormone receptors or HER2/NEU, is one of the most hypomethylated cancers observed. Here, we discovered that the TET1 DNA demethylase is specifically overexpressed in about 40% of patients with TNBC, where it is associated with hypomethylation of up to 10% of queried CpG sites and a worse overall survival. Through bioinformatic analyses in both breast and ovarian cancer cell line panels, we uncovered an intricate network connecting TET1 to hypomethylation and activation of cancer-specific oncogenic pathways, including PI3K, EGFR, and PDGF. TET1 expression correlated with sensitivity to drugs targeting the PI3K-mTOR pathway, and CRISPR-mediated deletion of TET1 in two independent TNBC cell lines resulted in reduced expression of PI3K pathway genes, upregulation of immune response genes, and substantially reduced cellular proliferation, suggesting dependence of oncogenic pathways on TET1 overexpression. Our work establishes TET1 as a potential oncogene that contributes to aberrant hypomethylation in cancer and suggests that TET1 could serve as a druggable target for therapeutic intervention.Significance: This study addresses a critical gap in knowledge of how and why methylation is prognostic in breast cancer and shows how this information can be used to stratify patients with TNBC for targeted therapy. Cancer Res; 78(15); 4126-37. ©2018 AACR.

Abstract 4320: p53 binding sites in normal and cancer cells are characterized by distinct chromatin context

Abstract The tumor suppressor protein p53 interacts with DNA in a sequence-dependent manner. Thousands of p53 binding sites have been mapped genome-wide in normal and cancer cells. However, the way p53 selectively binds its cognate sites in different types of cells is not fully understood. Here, we performed a comprehensive analysis of 25 published p53 cistromes and identified 3,551 and 6,039 "high-confidence" binding sites in normal and cancer cells, respectively. Our analysis revealed two distinct epigenetic features underlying p53-DNA interactions in vivo. First, p53 binding sites are associated with transcriptionally active histone marks (H3K4me3 and H3K36me3) in normal-cell chromatin, but with repressive histone marks (H3K27me3) in cancer-cell chromatin. Second, p53 binding sites in cancer cells are characterized by a lower level of DNA methylation than their counterparts in normal cells, probably related to global hypomethylation in cancers. Intriguingly, regardless of the cell type, p53 sites are highly enriched in the endogenous retroviral elements of the ERV1 family, highlighting the importance of this repeat family in shaping the transcriptional network of p53. Moreover, the p53 sites exhibit an unusual combination of chromatin patterns: high nucleosome occupancy and, at the same time, high sensitivity to DNase I. Our results suggest that p53 can access its target sites in a chromatin environment that is nonpermissive to most DNA-binding transcription factors, which may allow p53 to act as a pioneer transcription factor in the context of chromatin. Citation Format: Feng Cui. p53 binding sites in normal and cancer cells are characterized by distinct chromatin context [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4320.

Abstract 1289: Crosstalk between methylation and alternative splicing in cancer

Abstract Background: DNA methylation in promoter regions leads to transcriptional silencing, such as of tumor suppressor genes in cancer. However, the functions of DNA methylation in the gene body (intragenic, i.e., exons and introns) have not yet been completely elucidated. Recently, hyper-methylation has been implicated in enhancing exon recognition by recruiting methyl-CpG-binding protein (MECP2) to hyper-methylated sites. In this study, we examined intragenic methylation in splicing regulatory elements (SREs: exonic splicing enhancer (ESE), exon splicing silencer (ESS), intronic splicing enhancer (ISE)) as a mechanism to understand how epigenetic factors contribute to alternative splicing events in cancer. Hypothesis: Methylation patterns of SREs are involved in directing alternative splicing events in cancer. Methods: We developed a splicing decision model to identify actionable methylation loci potentially affecting splicing events (i.e., exon skipping) among CpG sites in putative intragenic SRE regions. We used DNA methylation and RNA-Seq data for breast and lung cancer samples and normal cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We additionally used hyper- and hypo-methylation data published in Selamat et al. (2013) as an independent lung cancer dataset. To identify regions hyper- and hypo-methylated in cancer, we performed an unpaired t-test for normally distributed data and a Mann-Whitney-Wilcox test for non-normally distributed data for differential methylation status (beta value) between cancer and normal cases. Multiple testing was accounted for by controlling the false discovery rate (p< 0.05 with FDR< 0.1). Results: We investigated whether specific patterns of methylation were enriched in SRE regions affecting exon skipping. We found that for breast cancer samples, differential methylation status was enriched in SRE regions but not in non-SRE regions. Particularly, hypo-methylation in cancer showed a greater enrichment in ESE regions with putative exon skipping events. Similar results were observed in the both the TCGA lung cancer cases and an independent lung cancer dataset. We calculated GC contents and the methylation frequencies at each position of the hexameric sequence of SREs and further investigated whether certain SREs are prevalent to be with methylation or not. These data suggest that hypo-methylation in SRE regions may cause failure to recruit MECP2, therefore leading to exon skipping. Conclusion: Our study suggests that intragenic methylation status is important for splicing regulation and may improve our understanding of how intragenic epigenetic markers play a role in gene regulation by affecting alternative splicing. Citation Format: Dongwook Kim, Seonggyun Han, Younghee Lee. Crosstalk between methylation and alternative splicing in cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1289.

The Arginine Methyltransferase PRMT6 Regulates DNA Methylation and Contributes to Global DNA Hypomethylation in Cancer

DNA methylation plays crucial roles in chromatin structure and gene expression. Aberrant DNA methylation patterns, including global hypomethylation and regional hypermethylation, are associated with cancer and implicated in oncogenic events. How DNA methylation is regulated in developmental and cellular processes and dysregulated in cancer is poorly understood. Here, we show that PRMT6, a protein arginine methyltransferase responsible for asymmetric dimethylation of histone H3 arginine 2(H3R2me2a), negatively regulates DNA methylation and that PRMT6 upregulation contributes to global DNA hypomethylation in cancer. Mechanistically, PRMT6 overexpression impairs chromatin association of UHRF1, an accessory factor of DNMT1, resulting in passive DNA demethylation. The effect is likely due to elevated H3R2me2a, which inhibits the interaction between UHRF1 and histone H3. Our work identifies a mechanistic link between protein arginine methylation and DNA methylation, which is disrupted in cancer.

Aberrant promoter methylation profiles and association with survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic and diagnostic value of genes with promoter methylation in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. On the basis of The Cancer Genome Atlas data, we identified genes with differentially methylated promoters in HCC tissues and adjacent non-tumor tissues, using the linear models for microarray data approach. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was applied to access the prognostic value of identified differentially methylated genes. The diagnostic value of the genes was evaluated through receiver operating characteristic. Pathway analyses were performed to illustrate biological functions of the identified genes. Compared to adjacent tissues, 77 genes with hypermethylated promoters and 2,412 genes with hypomethylated promoters were identified in HCC. The promoter hypomethylations of RNA5SP38, IL21, SDC4P, and MIR4439 were found to be associated with HCC patient survival (P=0.035, 0.040, 0.004, and 0.024, respectively). Hypomethylated SDC4P was associated with a better prognosis (hazard ratio, 0.482; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.147–1.110; P=0.007). The combination of the promoter hypomethylations with RNA5SP38, IL21, and SDC4P showed an area under receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.975 (95% CI, 0.962–0.989; P=4.811E-25). Several pathways, including olfactory transduction, cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction, natural killer cell–mediated cytotoxicity, as well as inflammation mediated by chemokine and cytokine signaling pathway, were annotated with the hypomethylated promoter genes. SDC4P promoter hypomethylation may be a potential prognosis biomarker. A panel of promoter methylations in RNA5SP38, IL21, and SDC4P was proven a novel approach to diagnosis HCC. The pathway analysis defined the extensive functional role of DNA hypomethylation in cancer.

Intragenic DNA methylation prevents spurious transcription initiation.

In mammals, DNA methylation occurs mainly at CpG dinucleotides. Methylation of the promoter suppresses gene expression, but the functional role of gene-body DNA methylation in highly expressed genes has yet to be clarified. Here we show that, in mouse embryonic stem cells, Dnmt3b-dependent intragenic DNA methylation protects the gene body from spurious RNA polymerase II entry and cryptic transcription initiation. Using different genome-wide approaches, we demonstrate that this Dnmt3b function is dependent on its enzymatic activity and recruitment to the gene body by H3K36me3. Furthermore, the spurious transcripts can either be degraded by the RNA exosome complex or capped, polyadenylated, and delivered to the ribosome to produce aberrant proteins. Elongating RNA polymerase II therefore triggers an epigenetic crosstalk mechanism that involves SetD2, H3K36me3, Dnmt3b and DNA methylation to ensure the fidelity of gene transcription initiation, with implications for intragenic hypomethylation in cancer.

The Arginine Methyltransferase PRMT6 Regulates DNA Methylation and Contributes to Global DNA Hypomethylation in Cancer

The Arginine Methyltransferase PRMT6 Regulates DNA Methylation and Contributes to Global DNA Hypomethylation in Cancer

High-Throughput Analysis of Global DNA Methylation Using Methyl-Sensitive Digestion.

DNA methylation is a major regulatory process of gene transcription, and aberrant DNA methylation is associated with various diseases including cancer. Many compounds have been reported to modify DNA methylation states. Despite increasing interest in the clinical application of drugs with epigenetic effects, and the use of diagnostic markers for genome-wide hypomethylation in cancer, large-scale screening systems to measure the effects of drugs on DNA methylation are limited. In this study, we improved the previously established fluorescence polarization-based global DNA methylation assay so that it is more suitable for application to human genomic DNA. Our methyl-sensitive fluorescence polarization (MSFP) assay was highly repeatable (inter-assay coefficient of variation = 1.5%) and accurate (r2 = 0.99). According to signal linearity, only 50–80 ng human genomic DNA per reaction was necessary for the 384-well format. MSFP is a simple, rapid approach as all biochemical reactions and final detection can be performed in one well in a 384-well plate without purification steps in less than 3.5 hours. Furthermore, we demonstrated a significant correlation between MSFP and the LINE-1 pyrosequencing assay, a widely used global DNA methylation assay. MSFP can be applied for the pre-screening of compounds that influence global DNA methylation states and also for the diagnosis of certain types of cancer.

Negative regulation of DNMT3A de novo DNA methylation by frequently overexpressed UHRF family proteins as a mechanism for widespread DNA hypomethylation in cancer.

Global DNA hypomethylation is a most common epigenetic alteration in cancer, but the mechanism remains elusive. Previous studies demonstrate that UHRF1 but not UHRF2 is required for mediating DNA maintenance methylation by DNMT1. Here we report unexpectedly a conserved function for UHRF1 and UHRF2: inhibiting de novo DNA methylation by functioning as E3 ligases promoting DNMT3A degradation. UHRF1/2 are frequently overexpressed in cancers and we present evidence that UHRF1/2 overexpression downregulates DNMT3A proteins and consequently leads to DNA hypomethylation. Abrogating this negative regulation on DNMT3A or overexpression of DNMT3A leads to increased DNA methylation and impaired tumor growth. We propose a working model that UHRF1/2 safeguards the fidelity of DNA methylation and suggests that UHRF1/2 overexpression is likely a causal factor for widespread DNA hypomethylation in cancer via suppressing DNMT3A.

The prognostic value of global DNA hypomethylation in cancer: a meta-analysis.

BackgroundAberrant methylation of the global genome has been investigated as a prognostic indicator in various cancers, but the results are controversial and ambiguous.Methods and FindingsThis meta-analysis presents pooled estimates of the evidence to elucidate this issue. We searched the electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, ISI Web of Science and the Cochrane library (up to August 2013) to identify all of the relevant studies. The association between the level of surrogates' indexes of genome-wide hypomethylation (LINE-1, Alu and Sat–α) and the overall survival (OS) of cancer patients was examined. In addition, the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were calculated to estimate the influences through fixed-effects and random-effects model. Finally, twenty studies with total population of 5447 met the inclusion criteria. The results indicate that the summary HRs for the studies employing LINE-1, Alu, and Sat-α repetitive elements also show that the global DNA hypomethylation have significant desirable effects on the tumour prognostic value. The pooled HRs (and CIs) of LINE-1, Alu and Sat-α were 1.83 (1.38–2.44), 2.00 (1.16–3.45), and 2.92 (1.04–8.25), with a heterogeneity measure index of I2 (and p-value) shows of 66.6% (p = 0.001), 57.1% (p = 0.053) and 68.2% (p = 0.076) respectively. The meta-regression and subgroup analysis indicated that the percentage of hypomethylated sample of cancer patients is one source of heterogeneity.ConclusionOur meta-analysis findings support the hypothesis that the global DNA hypomethylation is associated with a detrimental prognosis in tumour patients.

Comparative analysis of breast and colorectal tumours uncouples loss of DNA methylation in cancer from association with the nuclear periphery

The most significant epigenetic alteration found in cancer cells is a global loss of DNA methylation. Recent analyses of cancer methylomes have suggested that methylation is specifically lost from Lamin-associated domains (LADs) which are associated with the nuclear periphery. This suggests that nuclear organisation is a key influence on epigenetic alterations in cancer but the relationship between nuclear organisation and demethylation has not been directly investigated. We have combined analyses of cancer methylomes with fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH) to determine how nuclear organisation in normal cells relates to alterations in DNA methylation levels in cancer. Our analyses demonstrate that DNA methylation is lost from different regions of the genome in breast and colorectal tumours. Surprisingly, we find that the propensity to become demethylated in cancer is not correlated with localisation to the nuclear periphery in the corresponding normal cell types. While regions some breast cancer hypomethylated regions are localised to the periphery in normal breast epithelial cells, an equal proportion are found in the nuclear interior. Our observations decouple hypomethylation in cancer from a peripheral nuclear localisation and suggest that association with the nuclear lamina is not mechanistically involved in the loss of methylation in cancer.

MicroRNAs in Cancer: The 22nd Hiroshima Cancer Seminar/The 4th Japanese Association for RNA Interference Joint International Symposium, 30 August 2012, Grand Prince Hotel Hiroshima

The joint international symposium of the 22nd Hiroshima Cancer Seminar and the 4th Japanese Association for RNA Interference focused on a pivotal role of microRNAs in carcinogenesis, progression and therapy of human cancer. Mammalian immune regulator MCPIP1 (Zc3h12a) RNase acts as a novel suppressor of microRNA activity and biogenesis, suggesting the involvement of MCPIP1 in the alteration of microRNA biogenesis in tumorigenesis. Gene set enrichment analysis and functional assignment of microRNAs via enrichment analysis enable the prediction of microRNA activities from mRNA expression data by combining rank-based enrichment analysis and weighted evaluation of microRNA-mRNA interactions. MiR-124 and miR-203 function as tumor-suppressor microRNAs silenced by DNA methylation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Stella-induced DNA hypomethylation would confer the pathogenic function of DNA hypomethylation in cancer. Senescence-associated microRNA, miR-22, suppresses tumor growth and metastasis in vivo in a murine breast cancer model, and exosomal senescence-associated microRNA may affect the tumor microenvironment. The therapeutic potential of microRNAs for preventing and treating lung cancer using the Kras(LSL-G12D/+);p53(LSL-R172H/+)mouse model suggests that miR-34 may be useful in sensitizing tumors to other conventional therapeutics. MiR-1 and miR-133a cluster may function as tumor suppressors regulating novel pathways in human cancers. The down-regulation of miR-148a is implicated in invasion of gastric cancer, while high miR-21 expression in colorectal cancer is associated with poor survival. Neutral sphingomyelinase 2 regulates exosomal microRNA secretion and promotes angiogenesis within the tumor microenvironment as well as metastasis; in particular, the exosomal miR-210 secretion by neutral sphingomyelinase 2 confers the formation of the tumor vessel network.

AIM1 and LINE-1 Epigenetic Aberrations in Tumor and Serum Relate to Melanoma Progression and Disease Outcome

Aberrations in the methylation status of non-coding genomic repeat DNA sequences and specific gene promoter region are important epigenetic events in melanoma progression. Promoter methylation status in LINE-1 and Absent in melanoma-1(AIM1;6q21) associated with melanoma progression and disease outcome was assessed. LINE-1 and AIM1 methylation status was assessed in paraffin-embedded archival tissues(PEAT)(n=133) and melanoma patients’ serum(n=56). LINE-1 U-Index(hypomethylation) and AIM1 were analyzed in microdissected melanoma PEAT sections. The LINE-1 U-Index of melanoma(n=100) was significantly higher than that of normal skin(n=14) and nevi(n=12)(P=0.0004). LINE-1 U-Index level was elevated with increasing AJCC stage(P<0.0001). AIM1 promoter hypermethylation was found in higher frequency(P=0.005) in metastatic melanoma(65%) than in primary melanomas(38%). When analyzed, high LINE-1 U-Index and/or AIM1 methylation in melanomas were associated with disease-free survival(DFS) and overall survival(OS) in Stage I/II patients (P=0.017, 0.027; respectively). In multivariate analysis, melanoma AIM1 methylation status was a significant prognostic factor of OS(P=0.032). Furthermore, serum unmethylated LINE-1 was at higher levels in both stage III(n=20) and stage IV(n=36) patients compared to healthy donors(n=14)(P=0.022). Circulating methylated AIM1 was detected in patients’ serum and was predictive of OS in Stage IV patients (P=0.009). LINE-1 hypomethylation and AIM1 hypermethylation have prognostic utility in both melanoma patients’ tumors and serum.