Cancer Detection In Men Research Articles

Prostate Health Index Density Outperforms Prostate-specific Antigen Density in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Equivocal Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate: A Multicenter Evaluation.

We compare Prostate Health Index, Prostate Health Index density, and PSA density in predicting clinically significant prostate cancer in MRI-guided prostate biopsy. This is a multicenter evaluation of prospectively maintained prostate biopsy databases at 10 urology centers. Men with Prostate Health Index and MRI-guided targeted and systematic prostate biopsy performed and without prior prostate cancer diagnosis were included. The additional value of PSA density, Prostate Health Index, and Prostate Health Index density to MRI PI-RADS (Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System) score was evaluated with multivariable analyses, area under the curve, and decision curve analyses. The proportion of unnecessary biopsies that can be avoided are estimated for clinically significant prostate cancer (International Society of Urological Pathology group ≥2 prostate cancer). A total of 1,215 men were analyzed. Prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer were diagnosed in 51% (617/1,215) and 35% (422/1,215) of men, respectively. Clinically significant prostate cancer was diagnosed in 4.4% (3/68), 15% (72/470), 39% (176/446), and 74% (171/231) of highest PI-RADS score of 2, 3, 4, and 5 lesions, respectively. In multivariable analyses, independent predictors for clinically significant prostate cancer detection included Prostate Health Index (OR 1.04), prostate volume (OR 0.97), and PI-RADS score 4 (OR 2.81) and 5 (OR 8.34). Area under the curve for clinically significant prostate cancer of PI-RADS + Prostate Health Index density (0.85) was superior to PI-RADS + PSA density (0.81), Prostate Health Index density (0.81), Prostate Health Index (0.78), PI-RADS (0.76), PSA density (0.72), and PSA (0.60) in the whole cohort, and the superiority of Prostate Health Index density was also observed in PI-RADS 3 lesions. Decision curve analysis showed Prostate Health Index density achieving the best net clinical benefit in PI-RADS 3 or 4 cases. Among PI-RADS 3 lesions, using cutoffs of PSA density 0.15, Prostate Health Index 38.0, and Prostate Health Index density 0.83 could reduce 58%, 67%, and 72% of unnecessary biopsies, respectively. Prostate Health Index density outperformed Prostate Health Index or PSA density in clinically significant prostate cancer detection in men with multiparametric MRI performed, and further reduced unnecessary biopsies in PI-RADS 3 lesions.

50 - mpMRI and transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy in prostate cancer detection in men with previous negative systematic biopsy: A single-center five years’ outcomes.

50 - mpMRI and transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy in prostate cancer detection in men with previous negative systematic biopsy: A single-center five years’ outcomes.

P0906 - A predictive tool for clinically significant prostate cancer detection in men with prostate cancer suspicion

P0906 - A predictive tool for clinically significant prostate cancer detection in men with prostate cancer suspicion

A novel screening strategy for clinically significant prostate cancer in elderly men over 75 years of age.

A standard modality for prostate cancer detection in men 75 years and older has not been established. A simple screening method for elderly patients is needed to avoid unnecessary biopsies and to effectively diagnose prostate cancer. A retrospective study was conducted on elderly patients who had prostate biopsy at Kanazawa University Hospital (Kanazawa, Japan) between 2000 and 2017. Of the 2251 patients who underwent prostate biopsy, 254 had clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPC) with a Gleason score (GS) of ≥7 and 273 had a GS of <7 or no malignancy. In this study, patients aged 75 years or older were classified as elderly patients. GS ≥7 was characterized by a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of the maximum area under the curve of 12 ng ml−1 with a sensitivity of 76.2% and a specificity of 73.2%. For PSA levels between 4 ng ml−1 and 12 ng ml−1, based on the maximum area under the curve, patients with three or four of the following factors may present a GS of ≥7: percent free PSA >24, PSA density ≥0.24 ng ml−2, positive findings on digital rectal examination, and transrectal with 90.0% sensitivity and 67.4% specificity. In this study, we found that raising the PSA cutoff to 12 ng ml−1 for CSPC in elderly individuals can significantly reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies. Furthermore, CSPC could be efficiently discovered by combining the four supplementary markers in patients with a PSA level of 4–12 ng ml−1. By performing this screening for elderly men over 75 years of age, unnecessary biopsies may be reduced and CSPC may be detected efficiently.

Association between Liver Fibrosis and Serum PSA among U.S. Men: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2001-2010.

To evaluate the association of liver fibrosis scores with PSA level among U.S. adult men overall and by race/ethnicity. Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2001-2010, were used. Males ages ≥40 years without a prostate cancer diagnosis and who had serum PSA, liver enzymes, albumin, and platelet counts measured as part of NHANES protocol were included. Liver fibrosis was measured using three scores: aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis 4 index (FIB-4), and NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS). We assessed overall and race/ethnicity-stratified geometric mean PSA by fibrosis score using predictive margins by linear regression, and the association of abnormal fibrosis scores (APRI > 1, FIB-4 > 2.67, NFS > 0.676) and elevated PSA (>4 ng/mL) by logistic regression. A total of 6,705 men were included. Abnormal liver fibrosis scores were present in 2.1% (APRI), 3.6% (FIB-4), and 5.6% (NFS). Men with higher fibrosis scores had lower geometric mean PSA (all P trend < 0.02). Men with abnormal APRI had a lower odds of PSA > 4 ng/mL [adjusted OR (aOR) = 0.33; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.11-0.96]. Compared with men with 0 abnormal scores, those with 2 or 3 abnormal fibrosis scores had a lower odds of PSA > 4 ng/mL (aOR = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.33-0.91). The patterns were similar by race/ethnicity. Men of all race/ethnicities with higher liver fibrosis scores had lower serum PSA, and men with advanced fibrosis scores had a lower odds of an elevated PSA. These findings support further research to inform the likelihood of delay in prostate cancer detection in men with abnormal liver function.

12 - Whether p2PSA, %p2PSA and Prostate Health Index improves clinically significant prostate cancer detection in men with PSA range 2-10 ng/ml

12 - Whether p2PSA, %p2PSA and Prostate Health Index improves clinically significant prostate cancer detection in men with PSA range 2-10 ng/ml

Serum cholesterol and risk of high-grade prostate cancer: results from the REDUCE study.

BackgroundEpidemiologic evidence for a serum cholesterol-prostate cancer link is mixed. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is positively correlated with cholesterol, potentially increasing PSA-driven biopsy recommendations in men with high cholesterol, though biopsy compliance may be lower in men with comorbid conditions. These potential biases may affect PSA-driven biopsy rates and subsequent prostate cancer detection in men with high serum cholesterol. Our objective was to test the association between serum cholesterol and prostate cancer risk in men receiving PSA-independent, study-mandated prostate biopsies.MethodsWe conducted a post-hoc analysis of data from 4,974 non-statin users in REDUCE, a randomized trial in men with elevated PSA and a negative baseline biopsy. Men underwent 2- and 4-year trial-mandated prostate biopsies. Associations between baseline serum levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and prostate cancer risk, overall and by Gleason grade (<7 vs. ≥7), were examined using multivariable logistic regression.ResultsHigh total serum cholesterol was associated with an increased risk of high-grade prostate cancer diagnosis (ORper10mg/dl 1.05; 95% CI 1.00-1.09; p=0.048), but cholesterol was unrelated to either overall or low-grade prostate cancer risk (p-values>0.185). There was no association between serum LDL and overall, low- or high-grade prostate cancer risk (p-values>0.137). In contrast, elevated serum HDL was associated with increased risk of both overall (ORper10mg/dl 1.08; 95% CI 1.01-1.16; p=0.033) and high-grade prostate cancer (ORper10mg/dl 1.14; 95% CI 1.01-1.28; p=0.034).ConclusionsIn REDUCE, where all men received PSA-independent, trial-mandated biopsies thus ensuring complete prostate cancer ascertainment, high total serum cholesterol and high HDL were associated with increased risk of high-grade prostate cancer, supporting a cholesterol-prostate cancer link.

Vasectomy and Risk of Prostate Cancer in a Screening Trial.

Background: Vasectomy has been implicated as a risk factor for prostate cancer in multiple epidemiologic studies over the past 25 years. Whether this relationship is causal remains unclear. This study examines the association between vasectomy and prostate cancer in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial, which randomized men to usual care or annual prostate cancer screening.Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 13-year screening and outcomes data from the PLCO trial. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression stratified by study arm and age at vasectomy was performed.Results: There was an increased risk of prostate cancer in men who had undergone a vasectomy and were randomized to the usual care arm of the study (adjusted HR, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.20; P = 0.008). There was no association between vasectomy and diagnosis of prostate cancer in men randomized to the prostate cancer screening arm. Only men undergoing vasectomy at an older age in the usual care arm of the study, but not the prostate cancer screening arm, were at increased risk of being diagnosed with prostate cancer.Conclusions: Vasectomy was not associated with prostate cancer risk among men who were screened for prostate cancer as part of a clinical trial, but was associated with prostate cancer detection in men receiving usual care.Impact: The positive association between vasectomy and prostate cancer is likely related to increased detection of prostate cancer based on patterns of care rather than a biological effect of vasectomy on prostate cancer development. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(11); 1653-9. ©2017 AACR.

Pre-biopsy MRI as an adjunct for cancer detection in men with elevated PSA and no previous biopsy.

The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prior to biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve patients has been strengthened by recent developments such as the PIRADS V2 criteria, which cover acquisition, interpretation, and reporting for clinical practice and data collection for research. Important questions on the role of prostate MRI remain: can MRI be used as a triage test before first biopsy series? Can it be used to avoid the use of systematic biopsies (SB) and instead use only targeted biopsies (TB) to MRI-suspicious lesions? Studies to evaluate image guided TB compared to SB have started to accumulate. Objectives of these studies should be to reduce the detection of clinically insignificant disease, to maximize the detection of clinically significant cancer (CSC), to better assess disease size, grade and location. Accurate diagnosis will allow the choice of the most appropriate treatments options, minimising side effects and reducing overtreatment. Study results on MRI-TB detection rates are promising however some limitations should be considered. The majority of published and ongoing studies have been performed at expert centres, in order to demonstrate the optimal performance of MRI. Then, the validation of this strategy in less specialised institutions will be necessary before incorporating recommendations in international guidelines. It necessitates training for radiologists and urologists to perform and read MRI and MRI-targeted biopsy through education programs and standardization tools. All these advances will be consolidated with expected genetic screening tools to improve the detection of aggressive cancer.

CT-guided transgluteal biopsy for systematic sampling of the prostate in patients without rectal access: a 13-year single-center experience.

The purpose of our study was to examine the safety and diagnostic utility of transgluteal CT-guided prostate biopsy for prostate sampling in patients without rectal access. Seventy-three biopsies were performed in 65 patients over a 13-year period (2002-2015). Mean prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at biopsy was 7.8ng/mL (range 0.37-31.5). Electronic medical records were reviewed for procedural details and complications. Mean PSA and number of cores in malignant and benign cohorts were compared with Student's t test. Technical success rate was 97.3% (71/73; mean cores 8, range 3-28). Of these, 43.6% (31/71) yielded malignancy (mean Gleason score 7, range 6-10) and 56.3% (40/71) yielded benign tissue. The only complication was an asymptomatic periprostatic hematoma (1/73; 1.4%). In 14 patients who underwent surgery, Gleason scores were concordant in 71.4% (10/14) and discordant in 28.6% (4/14; Gleason 6 on biopsy but Gleason 7 on surgical specimen). Mean effective radiation dose was 18.5mSv (median 15.0, range 4.4-86.2). There was no significant difference in either mean PSA (p = 0.06) or number of core specimens (p = 0.33) between malignant and benign cohorts. CT-guided transgluteal prostate biopsy is highly safe and reliable for the detection of prostate cancer in men without rectal access. • Prostate cancer detection in men without rectal access is challenging. • CT-guided transgluteal prostate biopsy is safe and effective in these patients. • CT-guided biopsy may be particularly effective in diagnosing high-grade prostate cancer. • Unilateral CT-guided biopsy may be effective in patients with focal lesions. • The radiation exposure with this technique is acceptable.

High serum dihydrotestosterone examined by ultrasensitive LC-MS/MS as a predictor of benign prostatic hyperplasia or Gleason score 6 cancer in men with prostate-specific antigen levels of 3-10ng/mL.

There has been no consensus on the role of serum androgen concentrations in prostate cancer detection in men with prostate-specific antigen levels of 3-10ng/mL. In this study, testosterone and dihydrotestosterone concentrations in blood were examined by a newly developed method using ultrasensitive liquid chromatography with two serially linked mass spectrometers (LC-MS/MS). We investigated the correlation between serum androgen levels and Gleason scores at biopsy. We analyzed data of 157 men with a total prostate-specific antigen range of 3-10ng/mL who underwent initial systematic prostate needle biopsy for suspected prostate cancer between April 2000 and July 2003. Peripheral blood testosterone and dihydrotestosterone concentrations were determined by LC-MS/MS. Blood levels of testosterone and dihydrotestosterone were compared with pathological findings by multivariate analyses. Median values of prostate-specific antigen and prostate volume measured by ultrasound were 5.7ng/mL and 31.4cm3 , respectively. Benign prostatic hyperplasia was diagnosed in 97 patients (61.8%), and prostate cancer was diagnosed in 60 (38.2%) patients, including 31 (19.7%) patients with a Gleason score of 6 and 29 (18.5%) patients with a Gleason score of 7-10. Median values of testosterone and dihydrotestosterone in blood were 3798.7 and 371.7pg/mL, respectively. There was a strong correlation between serum testosterone and dihydrotestosterone. In multivariate analysis, age, prostate volume, and serum dihydrotestosterone were significant predictors of benign prostatic hyperplasia or prostate cancer with a Gleason score of 6. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for age, prostate volume, and serum dihydrotestosterone were 0.67, 0.67, and 0.67, respectively . We confirmed that high dihydrotestosterone blood levels can predict benign prostatic hyperplasia or prostate cancer with a Gleason score of 6 in men with prostate-specific antigen levels of 3-10ng/mL.

Combined T2 and diffusion-weighted MR imaging with template prostate biopsies in men suspected with prostate cancer but negative transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies

PurposeTransperineal template prostate (TPB) biopsy has been shown to improve prostate cancer detection in men with rising PSA and previous negative TRUS biopsies. Diagnostic performance of this approach especially MR imaging and using reliable reference standard remains scantly reported.Materials and methodsA total of 200 patients, who were previously TRUS biopsy negative, were recruited in this study. All the participants had at least 28-core TPB under general anesthetic within 8 weeks of previous negative TRUS biopsies. In 15 men undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, prostate specimens were sectioned using custom-made molds and analyzed by experienced pathologist as a feasibility study.ResultsIn total, 120 of 200 patients (60 %) had positive TPB biopsy results. All of these men had at least one negative biopsy from transrectal route. T2 diffusion-weighted MR imaging showed no lesion in almost one-third of these men (61/200; 30.5 %). Out of these, 33 (33/61; 54 %) showed malignancy on TPB including high-grade tumors (>Gleason 7). Out of 15 patients underwent surgery with a total of 52 lesions (mean 3.5) on radical prostatectomy histology analyses, TPB detected 36 (70 %) lesions only. Some of these lesions were Gleason 7 and more mostly located in the posterior basal area of prostate.ConclusionsTransperineal template biopsy technique is associated with significantly high prostate cancer detection rate in men with previous negative TRUS biopsies, however compared to radical prostatectomy histology map, a significant number of lesions can still be missed in the posterior and basal area of prostate.

P10.05 Cost-effectiveness of screening for anal cancer using regular digital ano-rectal examinations in hiv-positive men who have sex with men

Introduction The optimal screening strategy for early anal cancer detection in men who have sex with men (MSM) living with HIV is unknown. Methods We estimated the cost-effectiveness of regular anal examinations to screen for anal cancer in HIV-positive men MSM living in Australia using a probabilistic Markov model. Data sources were based on the medical literature and a clinical trial of HIV-positive MSM receiving an annual anal examination in Australia. The main outcome measures were undiscounted and discounted (at 3%) lifetime costs, life years gained, quality adjusted life years (QALY) gained and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Results Base-case analysis estimated the average cost of screening for and management of anal cancer ranged from $195 for no screening to $1,915 for lifetime annual screening of men aged ≥50 years. The incremental discounted, QALYs gained ranged from 0.02 for 4 yearly screening to 0.03 for annual screening of men aged ≥50 years. Screening of men aged ≥50 years generated ICERs of $29,760 per QALY gained (for screening every 4 years), $32,222 (every 3 years), and $45,484 (every 2 years). Uncertainty for ICERs were most influenced by the cost (financially and decrease in quality of life) from a false positive result, specificity of the anal examination, the probability of detection outside a screening program and the discount rate. Conclusion In settings where anal cytology for screening precursors of anal cancer is not available, screening for anal cancer by incorporating regular anal examinations into routine HIV care for MSM aged ≥50 years is most likely to be cost-effective by conventional standards. Disclosure of interest statement This project was funded by a program grant from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

Obesity is associated with higher risk of prostate cancer detection in a biopsy population in Korea

To evaluate the impact of obesity on prostate cancer detection, as measured by the body mass index (BMI) in a Korean biopsy population. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 1213 men who underwent transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy at our institution. Biopsy outcomes were analysed with respect to various variables, including patient age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume, digital rectal examination (DRE) findings and obesity, defined as BMI ≥25 kg/m(2) , an Asian BMI category. Among 1213 men, 408 (33.6%) were obese and 344 (28.4%) had a positive biopsy. Obese men were younger (65.5 vs 67.1 years, P = 0.003), had a larger prostate (49.2 vs 42.9 mL, P < 0.001) and were less likely to have any abnormality on DRE (8.1 vs 15.9% P < 0.001) than non-obese men. In the multivariate analysis, obesity was significantly associated with a higher risk of prostate cancer detection in men undergoing biopsy (odds ratio [OR] = 1.446, P = 0.024). In addition, obesity was significantly associated with a higher rate of biopsy-detected high grade (Gleason score ≥4 + 3) disease, and this association remained after multivariate adjustment (OR = 1.498, P = 0.039). Obese men were younger, had a larger prostate, and had less tendency to have an abnormality on DRE than non-obese men. Obesity was associated with a higher risk of prostate cancer detection as an independent factor, including high grade prostate cancer in a Korean biopsy population.

MP53-17 TRANSPERINEAL TEMPLATE PROSTATE BIOPSIES: THE NEW GOLD STANDARD FOR PROSTATE CANCER DIAGNOSIS

You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Detection & Screening II1 Apr 2014MP53-17 TRANSPERINEAL TEMPLATE PROSTATE BIOPSIES: THE NEW GOLD STANDARD FOR PROSTATE CANCER DIAGNOSIS Shady Nafie, John Dormer, John Kilian Mellon, and Masood Ahmed Khan Shady NafieShady Nafie More articles by this author , John DormerJohn Dormer More articles by this author , John Kilian MellonJohn Kilian Mellon More articles by this author , and Masood Ahmed KhanMasood Ahmed Khan More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.1648AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail Introduction and Objectives Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy is regarded as the gold standard for prostate cancer diagnosis. Transperineal template prostate biopsy (TPTPB) has been shown to improve prostate cancer detection in men with a rising PSA and previous negative TRUS guided prostate biopsies. We performed a prospective study directly comparing the prostate cancer detection rate between TRUS guided biopsy and TPTPB in 50 men with a benign feeling DRE, PSA < 20 ng/mL and no previous prostate biopsies. Methods 50 patients with a mean age of 67 years (range: 54-84), mean prostate volume of 58 cc (range:19-165) and mean PSA of 8 ng/L (range: 4-18) underwent standard 12-core TRUS guided prostate biopsy followed immediately by 36-core TPTPB under general anesthetic. We determined the prostate cancer detection rate between the two diagnostic modalities. Results A total of 20/50 (40%) men had benign pathology. Of the 30/50 (60%) diagnosed with prostate cancer 16 (32%) had positive results in both TRUS and TPTPB, while 14 (28%) had negative TRUS but positive TPTPB. Hence, TRUS guided prostate biopsy detected cancer in 32% whereas it was 60% with TPTPB. Furthermore, no cancers were detected solely by TRUS biopsy. In 19/30 (63%) the cancers detected by TPTPB had Gleason score ≥ 7. In total, 2 (4%) patients experienced urosepsis, 7 (14%) temporary urinary retention, 16 (32%) had mild haematuria and 19 (38%) haematospermia. Conclusions TPTPB is associated with a significantly higher prostate cancer detection rate compared to TRUS biopsies (60% vs. 32%, p<0.0001) in men with an elevated PSA < 20 ng/mL and a benign feeling prostate. We propose that TPTPB should be regarded as the biopsy technique of choice in this group of men. In addition, PSA appears to be a better biomarker for prostate cancer than previously thought. © 2014FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 191Issue 4SApril 2014Page: e595 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2014MetricsAuthor Information Shady Nafie More articles by this author John Dormer More articles by this author John Kilian Mellon More articles by this author Masood Ahmed Khan More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

The role of transperineal template prostate biopsies in prostate cancer diagnosis in biopsy naïve men with PSA less than 20 ng ml−1

To compare prostate cancer detection rates between transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) prostate biopsy and transperineal template prostate biopsy (TPTPB) in biopsy naïve men. TRUS biopsy is still regarded as gold standard for prostate cancer diagnosis. TPTPB has been shown to improve prostate cancer detection in men with rising PSA and previous negative TRUS biopsies. We carried out a prospective study performing both biopsies in the same group of men with a benign feeling digital rectal examination (DRE), PSA <20 ng ml(-1) and no previous prostate biopsies. A total of 50 patients with mean age of 67 years (range: 54-84), mean prostate volume 58 cc (range: 19-165) and mean PSA 8 ng l(-1) (range: 4-18) underwent standard 12-core TRUS biopsy followed immediately by 36-core TPTPB under general anaesthetic. We determined the prostate cancer detection rate between the two diagnostic modalities. In total, 20/50 (40%) had benign pathology. Of 30/50 (60%) diagnosed with prostate cancer, 16 (32%) had positive results in both TRUS and TPTPB, whereas 14 (28%) had negative TRUS but positive TPTPB. No cancers were detected solely by TRUS biopsy. TRUS biopsy detected cancer in 32% versus 60% with TPTPB. In total, 19/30(63%) cancers detected by TPTPB had Gleason score > or =7.2 (4%) experienced urosepsis, 7 (14%) temporary urinary retention, 16 (32%) mild haematuria and 19 (38%) haematospermia. TPTPB is associated with significantly higher prostate cancer detection rate than TRUS biopsies in biopsy naïve men with a benign feeling DRE and PSA <20 ng ml(-1). PSA appears to be better biomarker than previously thought.

Transperineal template prostate biopsies in men with raised PSA despite two previous sets of negative TRUS-guided prostate biopsies

The possibility of prostate cancer as a cause for steadily rising PSA despite previously negative transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsies is a major concern. An initial negative TRUS-guided prostate biopsy does not necessarily exclude the presence of clinically significant prostate cancer. We determined the role of transperineal template prostate biopsy (TPTPB) in prostate cancer detection in men with raised PSA despite two previous sets of negative TRUS biopsies. Between January 2008 and August 2012, a total of 122 men's records were reviewed after having 36-core TPTPB following two previous sets of negative TRUS biopsies despite raised PSA. A retrospective record of PSA levels, clinicopathological parameters and histological outcomes was made. Mean age was 63 years (range 49-77), and mean PSA was 18.0 (range 2.0-119.0). A total of 71/122 (58 %) men were diagnosed with prostate cancer on TPTPB. Of these, 28 (39 %), 34 (48 %), 5 (7 %), and 4 (6 %) had Gleason score 6, 7 (3 + 4), 7 (4 + 3), and 9 (4 + 5), respectively. The mean number of positive cores was 7 (range 1-22). Of these, only 15 (21 %) had ≤2 cores positive and Gleason score of 6. Of the 51 (42 %) men with a negative histology on TPTPB, 11 (22 %), 10 (19 %), and 30 (59 %) had atypical small acinar proliferation, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, or benign pathology. TPTPB is associated with a high rate of clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosis (58 %) in men with raised PSA despite two previous sets of negative TRUS biopsies.

Editorial Comment to Magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging-directed transrectal ultrasound biopsy increases prostate cancer detection in men with prostate-specific antigen between 4-10 ng/mL and normal digital rectal examination

Editorial Comment to Magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging-directed transrectal ultrasound biopsy increases prostate cancer detection in men with prostate-specific antigen between 4-10 ng/mL and normal digital rectal examination

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging‐directed transrectal ultrasound biopsy increases prostate cancer detection in men with prostate‐specific antigen between 4–10 ng/mL and normal digital rectal examination

To evaluate the ability of magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging to improve prostate cancer detection rate. A retrospective analysis was carried out of 278 men with prostate-specific antigen in the range of 4-10 ng/mL and normal digital rectal examination who underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Outcomes were compared between men who had a standard biopsy versus those who also underwent a prebiopsy magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. Men with an abnormal voxel on magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging had standard transrectal ultrasound biopsies plus biopsies directed to the abnormal voxels. The study group (n = 140) and control group (n = 138) were similar in baseline parameters, such as mean age, prostate size and mean prostate-specific antigen. The overall cancer detection in the magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging positive group (24.4%) was more than double that of the control group (10.1%). On comparing the magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging results with the transrectal ultrasound biopsy findings, magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging had 95.6% sensitivity, 41.9% specificity, a positive predictive value of 24.4%, a negative predictive value of 98% and an accuracy of 51.4%. Magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging-directed transrectal ultrasound biopsy increases the cancer detection rate compared with standard transrectal ultrasound biopsy in patients with normal digital rectal examination and elevated prostate-specific antigen in the range of 4-10 ng/mL.

Transrectal Saturation Technique May Improve Cancer Detection as an Initial Prostate Biopsy Strategy in Men with Prostate-specific Antigen

BackgroundUsing transrectal saturation prostate biopsy (SPBx) as an initial strategy remains a controversial topic. ObjectiveTo compare SPBx with extended prostate biopsy (EPBx) as an initial biopsy template in a large sequential cohort study. Design, setting, and participantsWe reviewed 438 men with initial SPBx and 3338 men who underwent initial EPBx between January 2002 and October 2011. InterventionOffice-based SPBx under periprostatic local anesthesia. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisThe yield of SPBx was compared with EPBx. Multivariable logistic regression models addressed cancer detection (CD) and cancer characteristics. Results and limitationsOverall CD was 51.6% and 42.6% in men who underwent initial SPBx and EPBx, respectively. Multivariate analysis confirmed that SPBx was an independent predictor factor correlated with the CD (odds ratio [OR]: 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30–1.92). Stratified by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values, CD was higher in SPBx compared with EPBx, 47.1% versus 32.8% (OR: 2.00; 95% CI, 1.19–3.38) in patients with a PSA <4 ng/ml and 50.9% versus 42.9% in patients with a PSA from 4 ng/ml to 9.9 ng/ml (OR: 1.62; 95% CI, 1.20–2.20). By contrast, SPBx did not increase CD in men with a PSA >10 ng/ml (60.0% vs 61%; OR: 1.42; 95% CI, 0.70–2.89). There was no significant difference in the detection of insignificant cancer (p = 0.223) or low-risk cancer (p = 0.077) between the two biopsy schemes. The limitation of our study is its retrospective nature and inhomogeneity. ConclusionsCompared with EPBx, SPBx significantly increases CD as an initial biopsy strategy in men with a PSA <10 ng/ml without a significant increase in the detection of insignificant cancer. These findings suggest that SPBx may merit further investigation as an initial biopsy strategy in men with a PSA <10 ng/ml in hopes of avoiding repeat biopsy for missed malignancy during the initial biopsy.