Canadian Emergency Medicine Residents Research Articles

Call to action: equity, diversity, and inclusion in emergency medicine resident physician selection.

This call to action seeks to improve emergency care in Canada for equity-deserving communities, enabled by equitable representation among emergency physicians nationally. Specifically, this work describes current resident selection processes and makes recommendations to enhance the equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) of resident physician selection in Canadian emergency medicine (EM) residency programs. A diverse panel of EM residency program directors, attending and resident physicians, medical students, and community representatives met monthly from September 2021 to May 2022 via videoconference to coordinate a scoping literature review, two surveys, and structured interviews. This work informed the development of recommendations for incorporating EDI into Canadian EM resident physician selection. At the 2022 Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) Academic Symposium, these recommendations were presented to symposium attendees composed of national EM community leaders, members, and learners. Attendees were divided into small working groups to discuss the recommendations and address three conversation-facilitating questions. Symposium feedback informed a final set of eight recommendations to promote EDI practices during the resident selection process that address recruitment, retention, mitigating inequities and biases, and education. Each recommendation is accompanied by specific, actionable sub-items to guide programs toward a more equitable selection process. The small working groups also described perceived barriers to the implementation of these recommendations and outlined strategies for success that are incorporated into the recommendations. We call on Canadian EM training programs to implement these eight recommendations to strengthen EDI practices in EM resident physician selection and, in doing so, help to improve the care that patients from equity-deserving groups receive in Canada's emergency departments (EDs).

Establishing a Self-sustaining Emergency Medicine Point-of-Care Ultrasound Curriculum in an Academic Teaching Hospital in Ethiopia.

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) training has become a standard component of Canadian emergency medicine (EM) residency programs. In resource-limited contexts, including Ethiopia, there is a critical shortage of local clinicians who can perform and teach POCUS. Our aim was to establish an introductory POCUS rotation within the EM residency program at Addis Ababa University (AAU) through The Toronto Addis Ababa Academic Collaboration in Emergency Medicine (TAAAC-EM). Through stakeholder engagement, the authors completed a quality improvement initiative and conducted a survey of AAU EM faculty and residents to understand which POCUS scans should be included in a core residency POCUS curriculum, "POCUS1". 17 residents completed the POCUS1 program and 16 residents completed the written survey. Focused assessment with sonography for trauma, inferior vena cava, and lung (pneumothorax, pleural effusions, and interstitial syndrome) were identified as core introductory topics. Seventeen residents completed the initial POCUS1 program. Three program graduates were supported to become "POCUS1 Master Instructors" to continue the program during the SARS-CoV-2 global pandemic. The authors identified the highest yield POCUS scans through a written survey, successfully introduced a sustainable core POCUS curriculum at AAU for EM residents, and graduated three master instructors for curriculum continuation. We outline the structure and materials for implementation of POCUS programs for EM trainees and staff in similar low- and middle-income countries.

The relationship between empathy and the quality of the educational environment in Canadian emergency medicine residents.

PurposeEmpathy and quality of educational environment appear to be inversely correlated with burnout but the relationship between the two is largely unknown. Our primary objective was to examine the relationship between postgraduate educational environment and empathy. Secondary objectives included impact of gender, residency year and on- versus off-service context on levels of empathy and educational environment.MethodsA modified Dillman approach was used to conduct an email survey of Canadian Royal College Emergency Medicine residents in June 2020. The survey instrument included: demographic data, Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ) and Scan of Postgraduate Educational Environment Domains (SPEED). Logistic and linear regressions evaluated the association between TEQ and SPEED, and mean SPEED scores and covariates, respectively.ResultsResponse rate was 38% (138/363) with representation from all programs. Respondents were mean 30 years of age, 59% men and 25%, 20%, 18%, 24%, and 13% in postgraduate year (PGY) 1–5, respectively. There was no statistically significant association between high/low TEQ scores and mean SPEED score (p = 0.97). There were no statistically significant associations between any of the covariates and high/low TEQ scores (gender, p = 0.21; PGY, p = 0.58; on-versus off-service, p = 0.46) or mean SPEED score (gender, p = 0.95; PGY, p = 0.48; on- versus off-service, p = 0.07). Emergency medicine residents rated their educational environment on average 3.44 (+/- 0.43) out of four. 39 of 134 residents were found to have low empathy.ConclusionThere was no association between empathy and educational environment. Further research is needed to elucidate modifiable factors contributing to the development of low empathy in emergency medicine residents.

Point of care ultrasound training in Canadian emergency medicine residency programs

Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) has been endorsed as an important clinical tool by the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) and is a training objective of emergency medicine (EM) residency programs accredited by both the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) and the College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC). Our objectives are to describe the national state of POCUS training in RCPSC-EM and CFPC-EM residency programs and to evaluate the implementation of the CAEP core POCUS curriculum in these programs.This was an online survey study of all POCUS education leads for both RCPSC-EM and CFPC-EM programs. The survey queried participants on program demographics, description of POCUS training, methods of POCUS assessment, and implementation of the CAEP core POCUS curriculum.The response rate was 100% (39/39). All RCPSC-EM and CFPC-EM programs provide POCUS training for their residents, and 100% of RCPSC-EM programs and 91% (20/22) of CFPC-EM programs have a POCUS lead. All programs provide POCUS training for their residents, but there is variability in how POCUS is introduced to residents, ongoing POCUS instruction provided throughout residency, and POCUS assessment. Only 47% (8/17) of RCPSC-EM and 32% (7/22) of CFPC-EM programs have a quality assurance process for the use of POCUS by their residents. POCUS leads believe their residents are proficient in the CAEP core POCUS applications by the end of training except for advanced cardiac and thoracic ultrasound.POCUS training in Canadian EM programs is prevalent, but there is variability in support for POCUS leads, delivery of training, determination of proficiency, and presence of quality assurance. While almost all programs deliver POCUS education aligning with the CAEP core POCUS curriculum position statement, more support is required both locally and nationally for sharing best practices for POCUS education.RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: L'échographie ciblée a été reconnue comme un outil clinique important par l'Association canadienne des médecins d'urgence (ACMU) et constitue un objectif de formation des programmes de résidence en médecine d'urgence (MU) agréés par le Collège royal des médecins et chirurgiens du Canada (CRMCC) et le Collège des médecins de famille du Canada (CMFC). Nos objectifs sont de décrire l'état national de la formation en échographie ciblée dans les programmes de résidence du CRMCC(MU) et du CMFC(MU) et d'évaluer la mise en œuvre du programme d'études en échographie ciblée de base d’ACMU dans ces programmes. MéTHODES: Il s'agissait d'une étude par sondage en ligne auprès de tous les responsables de l'éducation en échographie ciblée pour les programmes CRMCC(MU) et CMFC(MU). L'enquête interrogeait les participants sur les données démographiques du programme, la description de la formation en échographie ciblée, les méthodes d'évaluation en échographie ciblée et la mise en œuvre du programme de base en échographie ciblée d’ACMU. RéSULTATS: Le taux de réponse a été de 100% (39/39). Tous les programmes CRMCC(MU) et CMFC(MU) offrent une formation en échographie ciblée à leurs résidents, et 100 % des programmes CRMCC(MU) et 91 % (20/22) des programmes CMFC(MU) ont un responsable d'échographie ciblée. Tous les programmes offrent une formation en échographie ciblée à leurs résidents, mais la façon dont l'échographie ciblée est présentée aux résidents, l'enseignement continu d'échographie ciblée tout au long de la résidence et l'évaluation de l'échographie ciblée varient. Seulement 47 % (8/17) des programmes CRMCC(MU) et 32 % (7/22) des programmes CMFC(MU) ont un processus d'assurance de la qualité pour l'utilisation d'une échographie ciblée par leurs résidents. Les responsables d'échographie ciblée estiment que leurs résidents maîtrisent les applications de base en échographie ciblée d’ACMU à la fin de la formation, sauf pour l'échographie cardiaque et thoracique avancée. CONCLUSIONS: La formation en échographie ciblée dans les programmes canadiens de MU est répandue, mais il existe une variabilité dans le soutien aux responsables d'échographie ciblée, la prestation de la formation, la détermination de la compétence et la présence d'une assurance qualité. Bien que presque tous les programmes offrent une formation en échographie ciblée qui s’harmonise avec l’énoncé de position du curriculum de base d’ACMU, il faut davantage de soutien à l’échelle locale et nationale pour partager les pratiques exemplaires en matière d’éducation en échographie ciblée.

Education about sexual and gender minorities within Canadian emergency medicine residency programs.

The CAEP 2021 2SLGBTQIA +i panel sought whether a gap exists within Canadian emergency medicine training pertaining to sexual and gender minority communities. This panel aimed to generate practical recommendations on improving emergency medicine education about sexual and gender minorities, thereby improving access to equitable healthcare. From August 2020 to June 2021, a panel of emergency medicine practitioners, residents, students, and community representatives met monthly via videoconference. A literature review was undertaken, and three mixed methods surveys were distributed to the CAEP member list, CAEP Resident Section, College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC)iii Emergency Medicine Members Interest Group, and to emergency medicine residency program directors and their residents. Informed by the review and surveys, recommendations were drafted and refined by panel members before presentation at the 2021 CAEP Academic Symposium. A plenary was presented to symposium attendees composed of national emergency medicine community members, which reported the survey results and literature review. All attendees were divided into small groups to develop an action plan for each recommendation. The panel outlines eight recommendations for closing the curricular gap. It identifies three perceived or real barriers to the inclusion of sexual and gender minority content in emergency medicine residency curricula. It acknowledges three enabling recommendations that are beyond the scope of individual emergency medicine programs or emergency departments (EDs), that if enacted would enable the implementation of the recommendations. Each recommendation is accompanied by two action items as a guide to implementation. Each of the three barriers is accompanied by two action items that offer specific solutions to overcome these obstacles. Each enabling recommendation suggests an action that would shift emergency medicine towards sociocultural competence nationally. These recommendations set the primary steps towards closing the educational gap.

Attitudes, behaviour, and comfort of Canadian emergency medicine residents and physicians in caring for 2SLGBTQI+ patients.

Physicians working in the emergency department (ED) will interact with two-spirited, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer/questioning and intersex (2SLGBTQI+) persons as colleagues and patients. These patients have unique healthcare needs and encounter negative experiences when seeking medical care, leading to poorer health outcomes and inequities. This study aims to explore the attitudes, behaviour, and comfort of Canadian emergency medicine (EM) physicians in caring for 2SLGBTQI+ patients. An anonymous survey was distributed to EM staff physicians and residents through the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) network and social media channels. Demographic information was collected, and participants were asked about their comfort, current knowledge, and desire to gain new knowledge in caring for 2SLGBTQI+ patients. Personal perceptions and practice patterns in treating cisgender heterosexual (cis-het) and 2SLGBTQI+ patients were analysed using five-point Likert scales. Residents were asked additional questions regarding availability of learning experiences during training. 266 surveys were included in the final analysis consisting of 229 (86%) staff physicians and 37 (14%) residents. 97% (n = 258) of all respondents believed 2SLGBTQI+ patients deserve the same quality care from medical institutions as other patients. Further, 83% (n = 221) respondents agreed that they would like to increase their knowledge in taking care of 2SLGBTQI+ patients, while 34% (n = 91) agreed that performing physical examinations on transgender or intersex patients was more challenging than on cis-het patients. Among resident respondents, 46% indicated a lack of didactic teaching devoted to 2SLGBTQI+ care during residency (n = 17/37), while 38% encountered discrimination towards 2SLGBTQI+ patients, with most comments from senior faculty and nursing staff. This study suggests that Canadian EM physicians feel that 2SLGBTQI+ patients deserve equitable care when compared to cis-het patients. Future work should focus on educational needs and curricular enhancements in residency programs and continuing professional development for physicians to improve care for 2SLGBTQI+ patients in the ED.

Geriatric Emergency Care in Canada: Present and Future

With the growing senior population in Canada, geriatric emergency care becomes an emerging field of importance in medicine. This article will provide an overview to the current state of geriatric care in the emergency department (ED) in Canada by reviewing recent peer-reviewed literature. Although emergency medicine (EM) physicians have a series of sophisticated triage tools and algorithms, Canadian EM residents report feelings of ill-preparedness to treat geriatric patients in ED. High levels of burnout and frustration have been reported by EM staff including physicians and nurses regarding their attitudes towards elderly patients in the ED. The article concludes with several areas to focus on in order to improve geriatric EM in Canada, such as more efficient resource allocation, geriatric exposure in EM resident training, and room for respectful mutual decision-making between EM physicians and the elderly patient and their families.

Pre-departure and Post-elective Requirements for Global Health Electives: Survey of Canadian Royal College Emergency Medicine Programs.

Objectives: Global Health (GH) electives offer unique learning opportunities; however, risks to trainees and host populations should be minimized through pre-departure training and post-elective debriefing. In a 2016 study, only three Canadian residency programs mandated such training, although specific data on Emergency Medicine (EM) programs is lacking. This study aimed to identify GH elective requirements and perceived training gaps among EM programs.Methods: We conducted two email surveys (one each for EM program directors [PDs] and residents) regarding training requirements and perceived gaps for GH electives. We also contacted university postgraduate medical education (PGME) and GH offices, via their online publicized emails, to assess university-wide requirements and resources.Results: Nine PDs responded, with 78% reporting having residents participate in GH electives. Many PDs (67%) believed residents were moderately prepared for GH electives, while 33% felt they were unprepared to some degree. Forty seven out of an estimated 380 EM residents responded with 35% having completed a GH elective during residency. Of those, only one (6%) reported feeling very prepared, and 43% believed there was a need to improve trainings. Uncertainty around training requirements was reported, and residents identified challenges faced on electives, as well as priority topics for training. Responses from PGME and GH offices indicated that pre-departure training and post-elective debriefing were required or available at more universities than was indicated by the PD and resident respondents. However university requirements varied widely, with some exclusively requiring basic travel information and Health and Safety checklists or modules. The disparate responses indicate that residents and PDs may either be unaware of university requirements or not utilize available training resources for GH electives.Conclusions: Although Canadian EM residents participate in GH electives, the majority of training programs do not require pre-departure training or post-elective debriefing. PDs and residents report varying levels of preparedness, and residents acknowledge a variety of challenges during GH electives. This information can be used to inform pre-departure training and post-elective debriefing and encourage EM residents to access available university-wide training.

A national survey of burnout amongst Canadian Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada emergency medicine residents.

BackgroundIn recent years, there has been growing interest in the field of physician wellness and burnout. The prevalence of burnout is non-uniform between medical specialties and is most prevalent amongst emergency medicine physicians. Importantly, burnout can be observed amongst individuals early in their medical careers, including medical students and residents. Despite ample studies in other populations, there is no national perspective of burnout amongst Canadian Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC)Emergency Medicine (EM) residents.MethodsOur study surveyed Canadian residents undergoing EM training though the RCPSC via local program directors using an anonymous electronic form. Basic demographic characteristics and residents’ contemplation of suicide were surveyed. The Maslach Burnout Inventory – Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) for medical personnel was used to assess burnout on three dimensions (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and personal accomplishment).ResultsA total of 65 valid responses were collected from eight of 14 eligible institutions (response rate = 30%). Respondents are primarily male (58%) and in their postgraduate year (PGY) 1-3 (71%). Overall, 62% of residents met the threshold for burnout according to a widely cited definition of burnout using the MBI-HSS. Additionally, 14% contemplated suicide during their training. There was no statistical significance in burnout rates between male and female responders or between residents in different stages of training.ConclusionOur results suggest significant burnout amongst Canadian EM residents. These results point to an important opportunity to better support EM residents during their training to improve wellness and reduce burnout.

Health research methodology education in Canadian emergency medicine residency programs: A national environmental scan.

ObjectivesOur objective was to describe the variability of research methodology teaching among English-speaking Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada emergency medicine (RCPSC-EM) residency programs. We also aimed to identify barriers to teaching research methodology curricula.MethodsAn electronic survey was sent by email to program directors and residents of English-speaking RCPSC-EM training programs countrywide. Reminder emails were sent after two, four, and eight weeks. Quantitative, descriptive statistics were prepared, and qualitative data and themes were identified.ResultsWe received a total of seven responses from the possible 12 program directors (response rate = 58.3%). Out of 354 potential resident respondents, 82 (23.2%) completed the survey. There was disparity between resident and program director responses with respect to the existence of curricula, preparation for Royal College exams, and usefulness for future practice. Barriers to teaching a research methodologies curriculum included lack of time, support, educated faculty, and finances.ConclusionThis survey demonstrates that Canadian EM residency programs vary with respect to research methodology curriculum, and discrepancies exist between residents’ and program directors’ perceptions of the curriculum. Given the lack of a standardized research methodology curriculum for these programs, there is an opportunity to improve training in research methodology.

LO79: The variable landscape of resident selection: A study of Canadian Royal College emergency medicine training programs

Introduction: Little is known about how Royal College emergency medicine (RCEM) residency programs are selecting their residents. This creates uncertainty regarding alignment between our current selection processes and known best practices and results in a process that is difficult to navigate for prospective candidates. We seek to describe the current selection processes of Canadian RCEM programs. Methods: An online survey was distributed to all RCEM program directors and assistant directors. The survey instrument included 22 questions consisting of both open-ended (free text) and closed-ended (Likert scale) elements. Questions sought qualitative and quantitative data from the following 6 domains; paper application, letters of reference, elective selection, interview, rank order, and selection process evaluation. Descriptive statistics were used. Results: We received responses from 13/14 programs for an aggregate response rate of 92.9%. A candidate's letter of reference was identified as the single most important item from the paper application (38.5%). Having a high level of familiarity with the applicant was considered to be the most important characteristic of a reference letter author (46.2%). Respondents found that providing a percentile rank of the applicant was useful when reviewing candidate reference letters. Once the interview stage is reached, 76.9% of programs stated that the interview was weighted at least as heavily as the paper application; 53.8% weighted the interview more heavily. Once final candidate scores are established for both the paper application and the interview, 100% of programs indicated that further adjustment is made to the rank order list. Only 1/13 programs reported ever having completed a formal evaluation of their selection process. Conclusion: The information gained from this study helps to characterize the landscape of the RCEM residency selection process. We identified significant heterogeneity between programs with respect to which application elements were most valued. Canadian emergency medicine residency programs should re-evaluate their selection processes to achieve improved consistency and better alignment with selection best practices.

Residents' perspective of quality improvement and patient safety education in Canadian emergency medicine residency programs.

Quality improvement and patient safety (QIPS) competencies are increasingly important in emergency medicine (EM) and are now included in the CanMEDS framework. We conducted a survey aimed at determining the Canadian EM residents' perspectives on the level of QIPS education and support available to them. An electronic survey was distributed to all Canadian EM residents from the Royal College and Family Medicine training streams. The survey consisted of multiple-choice, Likert, and free-text entry questions aimed at understanding familiarity with QIPS, local opportunities for QIPS projects and mentorship, and the desire for further QIPS education and involvement. Of 535 EM residents, 189 (35.3%) completed the survey, representing all 17 medical schools; 77.2% of respondents were from the Royal College stream; 17.5% of respondents reported that QIPS methodologies were formally taught in their residency program; 54.7% of respondents reported being "somewhat" or "very" familiar with QIPS; 47.2% and 51.5% of respondents reported either "not knowing" or "not having readily available" opportunities for QIPS projects and QIPS mentorship, respectively; 66.9% of respondents indicated a desire for increased QIPS teaching; and 70.4% were interested in becoming involved with QIPS training and initiatives. Many Canadian EM residents perceive a lack of QIPS educational opportunities and support in their local setting. They are interested in receiving more QIPS education, as well as project and mentorship opportunities. Supporting residents with a robust QIPS educational and mentorship framework may build a cohort of providers who can enhance the local delivery of care.

A transparent and defensible process for applicant selection within a Canadian emergency medicine residency program

The Canadian Resident Matching Service (CaRMS) selection process has come under scrutiny due to the increasing number of unmatched medical graduates. In response, we outline our residency program's selection process including how we have incorporated best practices and novel techniques. We selected file reviewers and interviewers to mitigate gender bias and increase diversity. Four residents and two attending physicians rated each file using a standardized, cloud-based file review template to allow simultaneous rating. We interviewed applicants using four standardized stations with two or three interviewers per station. We used heat maps to review rating discrepancies and eliminated rating variance using Z-scores. The number of person-hours that we required to conduct our selection process was quantified and the process outcomes were described statistically and graphically. We received between 75 and 90 CaRMS applications during each application cycle between 2017 and 2019. Our overall process required 320 person-hours annually, excluding attendance at the social events and administrative assistant duties. Our preliminary interview and rank lists were developed using weighted Z-scores and modified through an organized discussion informed by heat mapped data. The difference between the Z-scores of applicants surrounding the interview invitation threshold was 0.18-0.3 standard deviations. Interview performance significantly impacted the final rank list. We describe a rigorous resident selection process for our emergency medicine training program which incorporated simultaneous cloud-based rating, Z-scores, and heat maps. This standardized approach could inform other programs looking to adopt a rigorous selection process while providing applicants guidance and reassurance of a fair assessment.

LO61: A national needs assessment on quality improvement and patient safety education in Canadian emergency medicine residency programs

Introduction: Quality improvement and patient safety (QIPS) are increasingly recognized as integral to the provision and advancement of emergency medicine (EM) care. In 2015, QIPS were added to the Canadian Medical Education Directives for Specialists (CanMEDS) framework. However, the level of QIPS education and support that Canadian EM residents receive is unknown. In order to better plan national QIPS efforts aimed at enabling EM residents to improve their local care settings, we sought to assess the current state of QIPS education and support in Canadian EM residency programs. Methods: This was a descriptive, cross-sectional electronic survey that was disseminated to all current Canadian EM residents from both Royal College (RC) and Family Medicine - EM training streams. Residents were recruited either directly or through their program's administrative assistant. The survey consisted of multiple-choice, Likert and free-text entry questions. Themes included a) familiarity with QIPS; b) local opportunities for QIPS projects and mentorship; and c) desire for further QIPS education and involvement. The survey was open for a five-week period, with formal reminders after the first and third weeks. Descriptive statistics are reported. Results: 189 (35%) of 535 current EM residents completed the survey, representing all 17 medical schools. 77% of respondents were from the RC stream. 54.7% of respondents reported being “somewhat” or “very” familiar with QIPS. 47.2% of respondents reported “not knowing” or “not having readily available” QIPS projects to participate in their local environment, and 51.5% had equivalent responses with respect to QIPS mentorship opportunities. Only 17.5% of respondents reported that QIPS methodologies were already formally taught in their residency program, and 66.9% indicated a desire for increased QIPS teaching. The majority of respondents were “slightly” (35.9%), “moderately” (23.2%) or “very” (11.3%) interested in becoming involved with QIPS training and initiatives. Conclusion: Responding Canadian EM residents are interested in obtaining greater QIPS education as well as project and mentorship opportunities, but many perceive that they do not have adequate access to these at the current time. As the importance of QIPS increases in the EM community, supporting residents with more robust educational infrastructures may be necessary. Future efforts may include the standardizing of QIPS postgraduate curricula and improving access to QIPS opportunities across the country.

MP56: A National survey of burnout and mentorship programs amongst Royal College Emergency Medicine residents

Introduction: In recent years, there has been growing interest in the field of physician wellness and burnout. Past research has shown that the prevalence of burnout is non-uniform between specialties and is most prevalent amongst emergency medicine physicians. Additionally, burnout can be observed amongst individuals early in their medical careers, including medical students and residents. To date, there is no national perspective of burnout amongst Canadian Royal College of Emergency Medicine (EM) residents. Our study looks to provide a national survey of burnout in this population as well as characterize mentorship programs at training sites. Methods: An anonymous electronic survey was e-mailed to Canadian EM residents via local program directors. Characteristics of mentor-mentee relationships and quality of residents’ mentorship experiences were assessed on a 6-point Likert scale. The Maslach Burnout Inventory – Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) for medical personnel was used to assess burnout on three dimensions (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and personal accomplishment). Burnout was dichotomized as present or absent if the MBI criteria are met (emotional exhaustion score > 26 or depersonalization score > 9 or personal accomplishment <34). Results: To date, 52 responses have been collected. Respondents are primarily male (63%) and in their PGY year 1-3 (71%). Responses were collected from 6/14 (43%) of eligible programs. 84% of residents currently had an emergency medicine mentor. Of these, 8% were dissatisfied with their residency's mentorship program and 55% were satisfied/very satisfied. 72% of residents met the threshold for burnout in at least one dimension of the MBI (3 dimensions = 17%; 2 dimensions = 17%; 1 dimension = 38%) and 13% cited considering suicide during their training. Conclusion: Results thus far suggest significant burnout amongst Royal College of Emergency Medicine residents. Alarmingly, 13% of responders cited having contemplated suicide during their training. These results point to an important opportunity to better support EM residents during their training to improve wellness and reduce burnout. Our findings suggest a high prevalence of residents with established mentors and future analyses will examine the correlation between mentorship characteristics and resident burnout levels.

LO60: Health research methodology education in Canadian emergency medicine residency programs: a national survey of curriculum assessment

Introduction: With a shift towards competency-based medical education, it is crucial to not only emphasize learner abilities such as clinical skills but also leadership in the conduct of research. Though the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada's (RCPSC) training objectives for Emergency Medicine (EM) residents state that the specialist physician be able to describe the principles of research, the research methodology curriculum across EM training programs in Canada is likely variable. The primary goal of this study was to describe the variability of research methodology teaching among RCPSC-EM residency programs. Methods: An electronic survey was distributed to English-speaking RCPSC-EM program directors (PDs) and EM residents. The survey investigated residents' and PDs’ thoughts on the adequacy of their local curriculum and asked them to quantify their research methodology teaching. The primary outcome was the frequency and content of current research methodology and research ethics teaching as well as a description of scholarly project requirements of EM residency programs across Canada. The data was presented with simple descriptive statistics. Results: 79 EM residents and 7 PDs responded (response rate 22.3% and 58.3%, respectively). All 7 PDs indicate having a research methodology curriculum while 71.6% of residents are aware of this curriculum. Only 57.1% of PDs report having formal assessments. Most programs (71.4%) teach via small groups while 28.6% of programs use large group sessions. Residents identify teaching as led by research staff (68.9%), staff physicians (60%), and EM researchers (57.8%), while only 17.8% use outside educators. Students noted various modalities of curriculum feedback such as online surveys, weekly forms, and verbal feedback. Regarding the strength of the curricula, 85.7% of PDs believed their curriculum prepares residents for board exams, while only 62.2% of residents felt similarly. When asked about using a standard web-based curriculum module if available, 60.5% of residents responded in favour. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that EM residency programs across Canada vary with respect to research methodology curriculum and discrepancies exist between residents’ and program directors’ perceptions of the curriculum. Given the lack of a standardized research methodology curriculum for these residency programs, there is an opportunity for curriculum development to improve training in research methodology.

Use of personal mobile devices to record patient data by Canadian emergency physicians and residents.

Use of personal mobile devices to record patient data appears to be increasing, but remains poorly studied. We sought to determine the extent and reasons that Canadian emergency physicians (EPs) and emergency medicine residents use personal mobile devices to record patient data in the emergency department (ED). A national survey was distributed to Canadian EPs and residents between 27/02/17 and 23/03/17. This captured demographics, frequency, and purpose of personal mobile device use to record patient data in the ED. It also asked about obtaining consent, security of information, implications for patient care, and knowledge of relevant regulations. The response rate was 23.1% (406 participants). A third (31.5%) reported using personal mobile devices to record patient data. Most (78.1%) did so more than once a month, and 7.0% did so every shift. Reasons cited included beliefs that using personal mobile devices to record patient data improves care by consultants (36.7%), expedites care (31.3%), and advances medical education (32.8%). Consent was rarely or never documented and a minority of participants (10.9%) indicated they did not obtain consent. More than half of participants (53.2%) reported being unaware of applicable regulations. This is the first Canadian study on the use of personal mobile devices to record patient data in the ED. Our findings demonstrate current practice may risk privacy breaches. Personal mobile device use to record patient data in the ED is common and Canadian EPs and residents believe that this practice enhances patient care.

Palliative and end-of-life care education in Canadian emergency medicine residency programs: A national cross-sectional survey.

Emergency physicians play an important role in providing care at the end-of-life as well as identifying patients who may benefit from a palliative approach. Several studies have shown that emergency medicine (EM) residents desire further training in palliative care. We performed a national cross-sectional survey of EM program directors. Our primary objective was to describe the number of Canadian postgraduate EM training programs with palliative and end-of-life care curricula. A 15-question survey in English and French was sent by email to all program directors of both the Canadian College of Family Physicians emergency medicine (CCFP(EM)) and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada emergency medicine (RCPSC-EM) postgraduate training programs countrywide using FluidSurveys™ with a modified Dillman approach. We received a total of 26 responses from the 36 (response rate = 72.2%) EM postgraduate programs in Canada. Ten out of 26 (38.5%) programs had a structured educational program pertaining to palliative and end-of-life care. Lectures or seminars were the exclusive choice to teach content. Clinical palliative medicine rotations were mandatory in one out of 26 (3.8%) programs. The top two barriers to implementation of palliative and end-of-life care curricula were lack of time (84.6%) and curriculum development concerns (80.8%). Palliative and end-of-life care training within EM has been identified as an area of need. This cross-sectional survey demonstrates that a minority of Canadian EM programs have palliative and end-of-life care curricula. It will be important for all EM training programs, RCPSC-EM and CCFP(EM), in Canada, to develop an agreed upon set of competencies and to structure their curricula around them.

P014: Palliative and end of life care education in Canadian emergency medicine residency programs: a national cross-sectional survey

Introduction: Palliative care is a broad approach to care for patients with serious or life-threatening illnesses. This includes relief of symptoms, such as pain, that interfere with a patient’s quality of life. It therefore falls firmly within the realm of emergency medicine (EM). 94% of emergency physicians report a need for education in dealing with death and dying. Nevertheless, there are no generally agreed upon competencies for Canadian EM residents with regard to palliative care and end of life care in the emergency department (ED). We performed a cross-sectional study of Canadian EM residency programs to measure the existing curricula in palliative and end of life care. Our primary outcome was the prevalence of structured educational programs for palliative and end of life care. Methods: An e-survey was e-mailed to all program directors of both CCFP(EM) and EM post-graduate training programs countrywide, using FluidSurveysTM. It included questions regarding current palliative and end of life care curricula from formal rotations to seminars and online modules. The survey was developed in consultation with the author group including specialists in education, palliative care medicine, emergency medicine, and medical education. Hired translators were employed to include French speaking programs in Canada. This study had ethical approval: Interior Health REB and UBC CREB certificate 2016-17-026-H. Results: The survey was open from October 12th to December 19th, 2016. During that time, we received 26 responses including 5 French speaking programs, for a response rate of 72.2%. The primary outcome was present in 38.5% of programs. There was no difference between FRCP and CCFP(EM) programs in the occurrence of the primary outcome (p=1; Fisher’s Exact Text). However, CCFP(EM) program directors commented that many of their residents had completed palliative care rotations in their family medicine training. The largest barriers to education included time (84.6%), curriculum development (80.8%), and availability of instructors (50.0%). Conclusion: Our preliminary analysis shows that few Canadian post-graduate EM programs have a structured educational program pertaining to palliative and end of life care. Current barriers to education that can be addressed in future curricular initiatives include lack of time, curriculum development, and instructor availability.

P098: Addiction medicine training in Canadian emergency medicine residency programs: a needs assessment survey

Introduction: Emergency department visits related to substance use are becoming more serious and increasingly costly in Canada. Emergency physicians must be able to effectively screen, manage, refer, and advocate for these complex patients. This study sought to describe the current state of addiction medicine training in Canadian emergency medicine (EM) residency programs and to assess the need for a formal curriculum. Methods: All Royal College and College of Family Physicians EM Program Directors (PDs) were asked to participate in a ten-question needs assessment survey on addiction medicine training for residents. Questions were developed through consensus after reviewing the relevant literature and conducting a formal pilot survey with staff physicians experienced in survey methodology. Responses were collected securely using the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) database. Results: 19 out of 31 (62%) eligible PDs completed the survey. The importance of addiction medicine training received a median score of 69.5 (IQR=74.0) on a scale of 1-100. Most programs devoted two hours or less per year of formalized teaching on individual topics (such as opioids, alcohol, harm reduction) over the past two academic years. The two most common teaching modalities used were didactic lectures (15/19, 78.9%) and case-based tutorials (12/19, 63.2%). Case-based tutorials were identified as the most effective teaching method (12/19, 63.2%). Topics highlighted as most important to include in a curriculum were: screening for substance use disorders and referral for further treatment (14/19, 73.7%), social determinants of health (14/19, 73.7%), alcohol, opioid, and stimulant intoxication and/or withdrawal (14/19, 73.7% each), and management of patients on opioid agonist therapy (14/19, 73.7%). The most commonly perceived barriers to implementing such a curriculum were insufficient curriculum time (10/19, 52.6%) and lack of qualified teaching staff (7/19, 36.8%). Conclusion: This needs assessment provides an understanding of the current state of addiction medicine training for EM residents in Canada. A case-based addiction medicine workshop is currently being developed to address identified curriculum gaps. Integrating this curriculum longitudinally into a time-constrained academic schedule is an important next step.