Canadian Association Of Emergency Physicians Research Articles

An Exploration of the Interplay Between Well-being and Quality and Safety.

Quality improvement and patient safety (QIPS) and clinician well-being work are interconnected and impact each other. Well-being is of increased importance in the current state of workforce shortages and high levels of burnout. The Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) Academic Symposium sought to understand the interplay between QIPS and clinician well-being and to provide practical recommendations to clinicians and institutions on ensuring that clinician well-being is integrated into QIPS efforts. A team of emergency physicians with expertise in well-being and QIPS performed a literature review, drafted goals and recommendations, and presented at the CAEP Academic Symposium in 2023 for feedback. Goals and recommendations were then further refined. Three goals and recommendations were developed as follows: QIPS leaders and practitioners must (1) understand the potential intersection of well-being and QIPS, (2) consider a well-being lens for all QIPS work, and (3) incorporate QIPS methodology in efforts to improve clinician well-being. QIPS and clinician well-being are often closely linked. By incorporating these recommendations, QIPS strategies can enhance clinician well-being.

Virtual urgent care is here to stay: driving toward safe, equitable, and sustainable integration within emergency medicine.

Virtual care in Canada rapidly expanded during the COVID-19 pandemic in a low-rules environment in response to pressing needs for ongoing access to care amid public health restrictions. Emergency medicine specialists now face the challenge of advising on which virtual urgent care services ought to remain as part of comprehensive emergency care. Consideration must be given to safe, quality, and appropriate care as well as issues of equitable access, public demand, and sustainability (financial and otherwise). The aim of this project was to summarize current literature and expert opinion and formulate recommendations on the path forward for virtual care in emergency medicine. We formed a working group of emergency medicine physicians from across Canada working in a variety of practice settings. The virtual care working group conducted a scoping review of the literature and met monthly to discuss themes and develop recommendations. The final recommendations were circulated to stakeholders for input and subsequently presented at the 2023 Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) Academic Symposium for discussion, feedback, and refinement. The working group developed and reached unanimity on nine recommendations addressing the themes of system design, equity and accessibility, quality and patient safety, education and curriculum, financial models, and sustainability of virtual urgent care services in Canada. Virtual urgent care has become an established service in the Canadian health care system. Emergency medicine specialists are uniquely suited to provide leadership and guidance on the optimal delivery of these services to enhance and complement emergency care in Canada.

RAFF-5 Study to Improve the Quality and Safety of Care for Patients Seen in the Emergency Department With Acute Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter

BackgroundWe sought to improve the immediate and subsequent care of emergency department (ED) patients with acute atrial fibrillation (AF) and flutter (AFL) by implementing the principles of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians AF/AFL Best Practices Checklist. MethodsThis cohort study included 3 periods: before (7 months), intervention introduction (1 month), and after (7 months), and was conducted at a major academic centre. We included patients who presented with an episode of acute AF or AFL and used multiple strategies to support ED adoption of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians checklist. We developed new cardiology rapid-access follow-up processes. The main outcomes were unsafe and suboptimal treatments in the ED. ResultsWe included 1108 patient visits, with 559 in the before and 549 in the after period. In a comparison of the periods, there was an increase in use of chemical cardioversion (20.6% vs 25.0%; absolute difference [AD], 4.4%) and in electrical cardioversion (39.2% vs 51.2%; AD, 12.0%). More patients were discharged with sinus rhythm restored (66.9% vs 75.0%; AD, 8.1%). The proportion seen in a follow-up cardiology clinic increased from 24.2% to 39.9% (AD, 15.7%) and the mean time until seen decreased substantially (103.3 vs 49.0 days; AD, -54.3 days). There were very few unsafe cases (0.4% vs 0.7%) and, although there was an increase in suboptimal care (19.5% vs 23.1%), overall patient outcomes were excellent. ConclusionsWe successfully improved the care for ED patients with acute AF/AFL and achieved more frequent and more rapid cardiology follow-up. Although cases of unsafe management were uncommon and patient outcomes were excellent, there are opportunities for physicians to improve their care of acute AF/AFL patients. ClinicalTrials.gov IdentifierNCT05468281

Canadian association of emergency physicians emergency ultrasound committee best practice recommendations on point-of-care ultrasound disinfection.

Canadian association of emergency physicians emergency ultrasound committee best practice recommendations on point-of-care ultrasound disinfection.

Modern management of acute atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter.

This clinical review is intended to assist emergency physicians manage patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with acute/recent-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) or flutter (AFL). This article is based primarily on the 2021 Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) Acute Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter Best Practices Checklist. We encourage readers to download the open access CAEP Checklist article (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43678-021-00167-y) and the free smartphone app (CAEP Atrial Fibrillation Guide). We focus on four key elements of ED care: assessment and risk stratification, rate and rhythm control, short-term and long-term stroke prevention, and disposition and follow-up. It is important to determine if AF/AFL with rapid ventricular response is a primary arrhythmia or secondary to medical causes. While it is unusual for patients with primary AF to be unstable, urgent cardioversion is occasionally required. The criteria for when cardioversion is safe have recently changed and it is essential that physicians are well versed in them. When rhythm control is not safe, provide effective and safe IV rate control. When rhythm control is safe, either pharmacological or electrical cardioversion acceptable, per patient and physician preference. Rapid ventricular pre-excitation (Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome) usually, but not always, requires urgent electrical cardioversion. ED physicians should prescribe oral anticoagulants at discharge if indicated. No specific direct oral anticoagulant is preferred, and references should be freely consulted for optimal dosing. Hospital admission is rarely required for acute AF/AFL patients, who should be given good discharge instructions.

Homelessness and Emergency Department Use: Wait Time Disparities Across Triage Acuity Levels.

Introduction Certain patient groups perceive specific barriers to accessing primary care, resulting in increased emergency department (ED) use for non-emergency conditions. There is evidence coming from other countries that homeless people are treated differently in accessing emergency services.Examination of ED wait time by demographic characteristics provides pertinent information to identify subgroups that are more subject to the consequences or causes of access block and delayed treatment. Methods We analyzed five years of Emergency Department Information System (EDIS) visit records of the largest tertiary care center in Atlantic Canada. The wait time from triage to seeing a physician was the outcome, housing status was the main exposure, and age and gender were the predictors. Quantile regressions were carried out to identify the influence of homeless visits in meeting the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) wait time benchmarks for each Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) level. The classification and regression tree method was used to quantify and classify the demographic subgroups contributing to wait time disparities across CTAS levels. Results Homeless visit medianwait times that exceeded the three-hour CAEP benchmark were significantly longer for urgent (by 40 minutes, CI: 25-55), semi-urgent (by 31 minutes, CI: 17-45), and non-urgent (by 57 minutes, CI: 25-89) than acuity level-matched domiciled visitwait times. At the 50th percentile, one-hourbenchmark homeless triaged as semi-urgent waited (median=20 minutes, CI: 12-28) longer, and no other triage-level differences were found at this benchmark. Homeless emergent-level visits that exceeded the three-hour benchmark were 28 minutes, on average, shorter than domiciled patients of the same acuity level. Homeless females above 40 stayed the longest for non-urgent care (mean=173 minutes), 82 minutes longer (p=0.0001) than age-gender-acuity level-matched domiciled patients. Homelessness was the most prominent ED wait time classifier for non-urgent, ED visits.Overall, homeless patients triaged as CTAS-5 waited 30 minutes longer (p=0.0001) than domiciled patients triaged as CTAS-5.Homeless male 16-20-year-olds waited the shortest time of 72 minutes. Conclusion Homelessness-related wait time disparities exist in the low acuity non-urgent-level ED visits more than in the other levels, supporting the theory that lack of primary care access is a driver of ED use in this group. Our acuity level analysis supports that homeless people of a certain age (older) and gender groups (female) wait longer than their age-gender-matched domiciled patients to be seen by a physician in low acuity level presentations. Given the pattern of the homeless being seen earlier or statistically similar in emergent-level visits compared to matched domiciled patients and that 16-20-year-old homeless males were seen on average within 72 minutes (the shortest mean wait time reported for the triage level CTAS-5), we decline the notion of discrimination at the study site ED. If homeless patients' non-urgent needs were met elsewhere, pressure on the ED to meet benchmarks might be reduced.

Referral pathways for chronic pain patients from Canadian emergency departments: emergency physicians' practices, perspectives, and recommendations.

Patients with chronic pain account for 12-20% of total emergency department (ED) and was the primary presenting concern among 37% of patients who visited the ED > 12 times per year. Despite this, emergency physicians receive little focused training managing these patients, and there is a paucity of effective referral pathways from EDs, despite strong evidence that chronic pain is best treated longitudinally in multidisciplinary clinics. This study sought to explore the practices, perspectives, and recommendations of current Canadians emergency physicians in better serving the chronic pain patient (CPP) population in the ED. An electronic cross-sectional survey was administered to members of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP), consisting of 16 multiple choice and numerical response questions. Responses were summarized descriptively as percentages and as the median and inter-quartile range (IQR) for quantitative variables. The study was completed by 169/1635 respondents for a response rate of 10%. The most common presentations respondents saw were neuropathic pain and centrally mediated disorders (23% each) and low back pain (19%). 86% of respondents felt that chronic pain patientsdid not get appropriate referrals from the ED, and 70% of respondents were unaware of where they could even refer chronic pain patientsfrom theED. 96% of respondents felt that their ED did not have an effective referral pathway for chronic pain patients. Rapid access clinics for common conditions, reduced pain clinic wait times, and clear ED referral pathways were the commonest recommendationsby respondents. There is a clear need to increase the accessibility to outpatient pain medicine clinics for chronic pain patients presenting to the ED.ED and pain medicine providers must collaborate to establish mutually beneficial referral pathways from EDs, and to advocate for increased funding for rapid access outpatient pain clinics.

Ready for practice? National recommendations for emergency medicine transition to practice curriculum.

Transition from residency to unsupervised practice represents a critical stage in learning and professional identity formation, yet there is a paucity of literature to inform residency curricula and emergency department transition programming for new faculty. The objective of this study was to develop consensus-based recommendations to optimize the transition to practice phase of emergency medicine training. A literature review and results of a survey of emergency medicine (EM) residency program directors informed focus groups of recent (within 5 years) EM graduates. Focus group transcripts were analyzed following conventional content analysis. Preliminary recommendations, based on identified themes, were drafted and presented at the 2022 Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) Academic Symposium on Education. Through a live presentation, symposium attendees representing the Canadian national EM community participated in a facilitated discussion of the recommendations. The authors incorporated this feedback to construct a final set of 14 recommendations, 8 targeted toward residency training programs and 6 specific to department leadership. The Canadian EM community used a structured process to develop 14 best practice recommendations to enhance the transition to practice phase of residency training as well as the transition period in the career of junior attending physicians.

Call to action: equity, diversity, and inclusion in emergency medicine resident physician selection.

This call to action seeks to improve emergency care in Canada for equity-deserving communities, enabled by equitable representation among emergency physicians nationally. Specifically, this work describes current resident selection processes and makes recommendations to enhance the equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) of resident physician selection in Canadian emergency medicine (EM) residency programs. A diverse panel of EM residency program directors, attending and resident physicians, medical students, and community representatives met monthly from September 2021 to May 2022 via videoconference to coordinate a scoping literature review, two surveys, and structured interviews. This work informed the development of recommendations for incorporating EDI into Canadian EM resident physician selection. At the 2022 Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) Academic Symposium, these recommendations were presented to symposium attendees composed of national EM community leaders, members, and learners. Attendees were divided into small working groups to discuss the recommendations and address three conversation-facilitating questions. Symposium feedback informed a final set of eight recommendations to promote EDI practices during the resident selection process that address recruitment, retention, mitigating inequities and biases, and education. Each recommendation is accompanied by specific, actionable sub-items to guide programs toward a more equitable selection process. The small working groups also described perceived barriers to the implementation of these recommendations and outlined strategies for success that are incorporated into the recommendations. We call on Canadian EM training programs to implement these eight recommendations to strengthen EDI practices in EM resident physician selection and, in doing so, help to improve the care that patients from equity-deserving groups receive in Canada's emergency departments (EDs).

Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) Literature Primer: Key Papers on Renal and Biliary POCUS.

Objective The objective of this study is to identify the top five influential papers published on renal point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) and the top five influential papers on biliary POCUS in adult patients. Methods A 14-member expert panel was recruited from the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) Emergency Ultrasound Committee and the Canadian Ultrasound Fellowship Collaborative. All panel members have had ultrasound fellowship training or equivalent, are actively engaged in POCUS scholarship, and are involved with POCUS at their local site and nationally in Canada. We used a modified Delphi process consisting of three rounds of sequential surveys and discussion to achieve consensus on the top five influential papers for renal POCUS and biliary POCUS. Results The panel identified 27 relevant papers on renal POCUS and 30 relevant papers on biliary POCUS. All panel members participated in all three rounds of the modified Delphi process, and after completing this process, we identified the five most influential papers on renal POCUS and the five most influential papers on biliary POCUS. Conclusion We have developed a list, based on expert opinion, of the top five influential papers on renal and biliary POCUS to better inform all trainees and clinicians on how to use these applications in a more evidence-based manner. This list will also be of interest to clinicians and researchers who strive to further advance the field of POCUS.

A brain-based definition of death and criteria for its determination after arrest of circulation or neurologic function in Canada: a 2023 clinical practice guideline

This 2023 Clinical Practice Guideline provides the biomedical definition of death based on permanent cessation of brain function that applies to all persons, as well as recommendations for death determination by circulatory criteria for potential organ donors and death determination by neurologic criteria for all mechanically ventilated patients regardless of organ donation potential. This Guideline is endorsed by the Canadian Critical Care Society, the Canadian Medical Association, the Canadian Association of Critical Care Nurses, Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society, the Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation (representing the Canadian Neurological Society, Canadian Neurosurgical Society, Canadian Society of Clinical Neurophysiologists, Canadian Association of Child Neurology, Canadian Society of Neuroradiology, and Canadian Stroke Consortium), Canadian Blood Services, the Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program, the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians, the Nurse Practitioners Association of Canada, and the Canadian Cardiovascular Critical Care Society.

Point of Care Ultrasound Literature Primer: Key Papers on Focused Assessment With Sonography in Trauma (FAST) and Extended FAST

Objective The objective of this study is to identify the top five most influential papers published on focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) and the top five most influential papers on the extended FAST (E-FAST) in adult patients. Methods An expert panel was recruited from the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) Emergency Ultrasound Committee and the Canadian Ultrasound Fellowship Collaborative. These experts are ultrasound fellowship-trained or equivalent, are involved with point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) research and scholarship, and are leaders inboth the POCUSprogram at their local site and within the national Canadian POCUS community. This 14-member expert group used a modified Delphi process consisting of three rounds of sequential surveys and discussion to achieve consensus on the top five most influential papers for FAST and E-FAST. Results The expert panel identified 56 relevant papers on FAST and 40 relevant papers on E-FAST. After completing all three rounds of the modified Delphi process, the authors identified the top five most influential papers on FAST and the top five most influential papers on E-FAST. Conclusion We have developed a reading list of the top five influential papers for FAST and E-FAST that will benefit residents, fellows, and clinicians who are interested in using POCUS in an evidence-informed manner.

HOCUS POCUS - Exploring the use of Artificial Intelligence in Point of Care Ultrasound Application in the Emergency Department

The field of emergency medicine has changed since the first introduction of portable ultrasound fifty years ago. Smaller equipment and the ability to produce higher quality images has driven the wide adoption of Point-of-Care Ultrasound (PoCUS) in emergency departments. PoCUS is an integral tool for physicians to obtain images in real-time and rapidly diagnose critically ill patients for timely intervention when every minute matters. Recognizing Core applications of PoCUS has been highlighted by the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians and training programs are within the core curriculum for EM residency. However, the main challenge of PoCUS is that the diagnostic accuracy and interpretability is dependent on operator expertise. With the resurgent interest in artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare, its integration into PoCUS was promising. Several studies have looked at integrating AI analysis with PoCUS imaging to improve diagnostic accuracy, guide training models, and increase the accessibility of PoCUS for novice users. Given that PoCUS usage improves patient satisfaction and clinician confidence, increased PoCUS usage is a worthy and achievable goal in Canadian emergency departments. The promising adaptation of artificial intelligence with PoCUS assessments will serve to expand training and diagnostic confidence to improve patient outcomes.

Factors influencing HINTS exam usage by Canadian Emergency Medicine Physicians.

The HINTS examination (head impulse, nystagmus, test of skew) is a bedside physical examination technique that can distinguish between vertigo due to stroke, and more benign peripheral vestibulopathies. Uptake of this examination is low among Emergency Medicine (EM) physicians; therefore, we surveyed Canadian EM physicians to determine when the HINTS exam is employed, and what factors account for its low uptake. We designed and tested a 26-question online survey, and disseminated it via email to EM physicians registered with the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP), with 3 and 5-week reminder emails to increase completion. This anonymous survey had no incentives for participation, and was completed by 185 EM physicians, with post-graduate medical training in either Emergency Medicine or Family Medicine. The primary outcomes were the frequencies of various responses to survey questions, with secondary outcomes being the associations between participant characteristics and given responses. 88 respondents (47.8%) consistently use the HINTS examination in the work-up of vertigo, and 117 (63.7%) employ it in scenarios where its clinical utility is limited. The latter is more common among physicians working in non-academic settings, without 5-year EM residency training, and with greater years of practice (p < 0.01). The most frequent explanations for non-use were a lack of need for the HINTS examination, the lack of validation of the exam among EM physicians, and concerns surrounding the head-impulse test. Though HINTS exam usage is common, there is a need for education on when to apply it, and how to do so, particularly as concerns the head-impulse test. Our attached rubric may assist with this, but quality-improvement initiatives are warranted. Low uptake is partly due to the lack of validation of this examination among EM physicians, so effort should be made to conduct well-designed HINTS trials exclusively involving EM physicians.

Survey on Current Practice of Canadian Physicians Regarding the Investigation in Older Patients with Delirium.

BackgroundThe current literature provides heterogeneous recommendation regarding the investigation of older delirious patients, which may lead to over-testing. Our study aims to describe Canadian physicians’ current practice for the investigation of older patients with delirium. Our secondary objective is to define specific indications for performing a CT head scan in this population.MethodsDesign: cross-sectional online survey. Participants: physicians who conduct their clinical practice in Canada and who care for older patients with delirium. Potential study participants were reached through Canadian associations: Canadian Geriatrics Society, the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians, the Association des Médecins d’Urgence du Québec, and members of Choosing Wisely Canada.ResultsWe received 296 survey responses. More than 80% of respondents always order complete blood count, urea, and creatinine and electrolytes. Extended electrolytes, TSH, chest X-ray, electrocardiogram, urinalysis and urinary culture tests tend to be ordered somewhat frequently. Physicians mostly agreed to order a head CT scan for loss of consciousness, altered mental status, fall, and anticoagulation.ConclusionsPhysicians’ investigations for older patients with delirium are highly variable, even with the lack of evidence supporting a broad workup. Also, respondents mostly align with current recommendations of indications for CT head scans.

Pediatric ED departmental complexity: a different approach to the concept of ED crowding.

Emergency department (ED) crowding is a significant problem in Canada and internationally and is associated with the potential for patient harm. Although pediatric patients represent a significant proportion of overall ED visits, there is limited research on pediatric ED crowding. The Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians defines department crowding as a mismatch between the required and available resources to provide timely emergency care. We propose that rather than crowding, it is better to think of ED patient populations as being more or less "complex" as defined by proxies of the human and physical resources needed for patient management. The study objectives are to explore the utility of a simple and easily available retrospective metric of ED complexity, and to assess the relationship this measure has on patient outcomes in a pediatric ED. Using administrative data from a tertiary care pediatric ED, we developed a departmental complexity score based on patient registration number, triage acuity, and departmental length of stay as a proxy for the resources necessary to provide ED care. We then explored the relationship between this departmental complexity score and clinical care indices. The score shows a strong relationship with the number of patients who left without being seen by a physician, as well as time to initial MD assessment, both measures which have been used to represent ED crowding in previous research. We found no association between our departmental complexity score and adverse impacts on patient care outcomes of hospital admission, pediatric ICU admission, or patients returning to the ED within 72h of leaving. The departmental complexity score has promise as a retrospective measure of departmental resource requirement and may have a role in the ongoing assessment of patient flow.

Which Recommendations Are You Using? A Survey of Emergency Physician Management of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

BackgroundBoth the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) and the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) have published documents to guide atrial fibrillation (AF) management. In 2021, the CAEP updated its AF checklist. Prior to this update, the recommendations of the 2 organizations differed in several key areas, including the suggested cardioversion timeframe, the factors determining cardioversion eligibility, and anticoagulant initiation after cardioversion. Whether emergency physicians (EPs) are aware of, or adhering to, one, both, or neither of these documents is unknown. MethodsWe assessed document awareness, adherence, and EP practice using a piloted questionnaire administered to EPs at 5 emergency departments in 3 provinces. ResultsOf 166 survey recipients, 123 (74.1%) responded. The majority (64.7%) worked at an academic site, 38.8% identified as female, and median years in practice was 10.0. Most (93.1%) were aware of at least one of the documents; 45.7% were aware of both. Reported awareness was higher for the CCS (77.6%) vs the CAEP (61.2%) guidelines. Respondents varied in their adherence, with 40.5% using parts of both documents. Considerable practice variability occurred when recommendations conflicted. Despite its use not being recommended by either organization, half of respondents (50.0%) reported using the CHA2DS2-VASc score as their stroke-risk assessment tool. ConclusionsAlthough most surveyed EPs were aware of at least one organization’s AF documents, many reported using parts of both. When recommendations conflicted, EPs were divided in their decision-making. These findings emphasize the need to improve consensus between organizations and further improve knowledge translation.

CAEP 2021 Academic Symposium: recommendations for addressing racism and colonialism in emergency medicine.

PurposeRacism and colonialism impact health, physician advancement, professional development and medical education in Canada. The Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) has committed to addressing inequities in health in their recent statement on racism. The objective of this project was to develop recommendations for addressing racism and colonialism in emergency medicine.MethodsThe authors, in collaboration with a 40 member working group, conducted a literature search, held a community consultation, solicited input from expert medical, academic and community advisors, conducted a national survey of emergency physicians, and presented draft recommendations at the 2021 CAEP Academic Symposium on Equity, Diversity and Inclusion for a live facilitated discussion with a post-session survey.ResultsSixteen recommendations were generated in the areas of patient care, hospital and departmental commitment to Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion, physician advancement, and professional development and medical education.ConclusionEmergency physicians are uniquely positioned to promote equity at each encounter with patients, peers and learners. The 16 recommendations presented here are practical steps to countering racism and colonialism everyday in emergency medicine.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43678-021-00244-2.

P.079 Factors influencing HINTS exam usage by Canadian Emergency Medicine Physicians

Background: The HINTS examination is a sensitive and specific tool for determining whether a patient presenting with an acute vestibular syndrome has had a stroke. Despite its efficacy, it is often not used by Emergency Medicine (EM) physicians when assessing patients with vertigo. Methods: To ascertain why, we surveyed, by email, physicians registered with the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians, to gather information on their practices when assessing patients with vertigo, and their utilization and perspectives concerning the HINTS examination. Results: 185 participants responded to our survey, demographically representative of Canadian EM physicians. The majority regularly use the HINTS exam in the appropriate setting, but significant minorities employ the exam inappropriately, such as in patients without nystagmus, with other neurological findings, or alongside tests for intermittent vertigo. Misapplication was associated with older age, years of practice, non-academic practice settings, and less residency training (p&lt;0.05). The predominant reasons for not using this examination are lack of confidence in recalling and performing component exam techniques, particularly the head-impulse test, and doubts about the necessity, safety, or validity of this examination. Conclusions: HINTS examination use is limited by lack of provider skill, safety concerns, and doubts on its validity in excluding stroke when employed by EM physicians.

Attitudes, behaviour, and comfort of Canadian emergency medicine residents and physicians in caring for 2SLGBTQI+ patients.

Physicians working in the emergency department (ED) will interact with two-spirited, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer/questioning and intersex (2SLGBTQI+) persons as colleagues and patients. These patients have unique healthcare needs and encounter negative experiences when seeking medical care, leading to poorer health outcomes and inequities. This study aims to explore the attitudes, behaviour, and comfort of Canadian emergency medicine (EM) physicians in caring for 2SLGBTQI+ patients. An anonymous survey was distributed to EM staff physicians and residents through the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) network and social media channels. Demographic information was collected, and participants were asked about their comfort, current knowledge, and desire to gain new knowledge in caring for 2SLGBTQI+ patients. Personal perceptions and practice patterns in treating cisgender heterosexual (cis-het) and 2SLGBTQI+ patients were analysed using five-point Likert scales. Residents were asked additional questions regarding availability of learning experiences during training. 266 surveys were included in the final analysis consisting of 229 (86%) staff physicians and 37 (14%) residents. 97% (n = 258) of all respondents believed 2SLGBTQI+ patients deserve the same quality care from medical institutions as other patients. Further, 83% (n = 221) respondents agreed that they would like to increase their knowledge in taking care of 2SLGBTQI+ patients, while 34% (n = 91) agreed that performing physical examinations on transgender or intersex patients was more challenging than on cis-het patients. Among resident respondents, 46% indicated a lack of didactic teaching devoted to 2SLGBTQI+ care during residency (n = 17/37), while 38% encountered discrimination towards 2SLGBTQI+ patients, with most comments from senior faculty and nursing staff. This study suggests that Canadian EM physicians feel that 2SLGBTQI+ patients deserve equitable care when compared to cis-het patients. Future work should focus on educational needs and curricular enhancements in residency programs and continuing professional development for physicians to improve care for 2SLGBTQI+ patients in the ED.