There are calls for US presidential elections to be changed. The existing Electoral College system, a method that has been in effect in every presidential election since the 1804 approval of the Twelfth Amendment to the US Constitution, is seen by those seeking change as an unjust way for selecting US presidents. Many Democrats remain enraged by the fact that Hillary Clinton received more votes than Donald Trump in 2016 but was not elected president due to the Electoral College’s state-by-state electoral system. A movement is taking place in some state legislatures to adopt a system called the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact [the Compact]. This is a key part of a strategy drafted in 2006 and not yet operative but gaining state signatories. At this point in May 2019 all the current 15 state signatories to the Compact represent states with Democratic-controlled legislatures. The District of Columbia has also voted to join the Compact, bringing the total count to 16. The Investors Business Daily published an analysis of the worst run and best run states from a fiscal perspective. The worst run states included Illinois, California, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Connecticut, Hawaii, New Mexico, New York, and Rhode Island. Each of these states is a signatory to the national popular vote Compact. The best run states included South Dakota, Tennessee, Nebraska, Florida, Utah, Alaska, Oklahoma, Wyoming, New Hampshire, and Montana. With the exception of New Hampshire they are all “Red” states. None is a signatory to the Compact. The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact is an attempt at a “quiet coup” seeking permanent voting control of the office of the US Presidency. As such it offers a perfect recipe for the balkanization of America, contradicting the wisdom of those such as James Madison, one of our Founding Fathers who played a critical role in the formation of our Constitution. Madison recognized the inevitable factionalism of competing interests and diverse cultures in America. The Compact seeks to effectively amend the US Constitution de facto while pretending otherwise. The advocates launched a strategy through the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact knowing they could not gain the required approval of three-fourths of US states to create a national vote simple majority or plurality amendment to the US Constitution in place of the Twelfth Amendment’s Electoral College system.
Read full abstract