AbstractHerein an assessment of several long range corrected (LRC) density functional theory (DFT) methods for the calculation of reduction potentials of the ([Ni(X2C2H2)2]n/[Ni(X2C2H2)2]n−1), and ([Ni(X2C2H2)(N2C2H4)]n/[Ni(X2C2H2)(N2C2H4)]n−1) and (where X = S or Se and n = 0, or −1) redox couples was done. From the results the values of ω that provide best agreement with CCSD(T) for the tested LRC DFT methods are 0.05, 0.15, 0.05, and 0.20 bohr−1 for ω‐B97XD, LC‐BLYP, CAM‐B3LYP, and ω‐B97, respectively. With these values the unsigned average in error was 0.12 V with a SD of 0.13 V for ω‐B97XD. For LC‐BLYP, CAM‐B3LYP, and ω‐B97 the unsigned averages in relative errors were 0.12, 0.11, and 0.13 V, respectively, with respective SDs of 0.11, 0.12, and 0.13 V.
Read full abstract