C4d-negative Antibody-mediated Rejection Research Articles

“Pre-Histologic” Antibody-Mediated Rejection Detected by Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA and a Novel Tissue Gene Expression Assay: A Case Report

Despite its well-characterized association with poor long-term graft outcomes, subclinical antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in recipients of kidney transplants continues to pose a significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Specifically, its detection currently relies on invasive histologic surveillance, a relatively uncommon practice among US transplant centers. We describe a subclinical, "pre-histologic" antibody-mediated rejection identified and characterized by a combination of novel molecular tools, donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA), and molecular histology. A 67-year-old kidney transplant recipient was found to have a marked elevation of dd-cfDNA on routine testing at 3 months post-transplant; other laboratory parameters were stable. A biopsy was performed, demonstrating the absence of rejection by traditional histology, but evidence of rejection was seen when tissue was evaluated using a research use molecular histology assay. Four months later, in the setting of persistently elevated dd-cfDNA, the patient developed graft dysfunction and was found to have C4d-negative ABMR, which was treated with improvement in both graft function and dd-cfDNA. This case highlighted the complementary use of dd-cfDNA and molecular histology to aid in the early detection and characterization of graft injury. Hybrid approaches combining these tools may allow more expeditious therapeutic intervention, leading to improved graft and patient outcomes.

Revisiting the changes in the Banff classification for antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation.

The Banff classification for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) has undergone important changes, mainly by inclusion of C4d-negative ABMR in Banff'13 and elimination of suspicious ABMR (sABMR) with the use of C4d as surrogate for HLA-DSA in Banff'17. We aimed to evaluate the numerical and prognostic repercussions of these changes in a single-center cohort study of 949 single kidney transplantations, comprising 3662 biopsies that were classified according to the different versions of the Banff classification. Overall, the number of ABMR and sABMR cases increased from Banff'01 to Banff'13. In Banff'17, 248 of 292 sABMR biopsies were reclassified to No ABMR, and 44 of 292 to ABMR. However, reclassified sABMR biopsies had worse and better outcome than No ABMR and ABMR, which was mainly driven by the presence of microvascular inflammation and absence of HLA-DSA, respectively. Consequently, the discriminative performance for allograft failure was lowest in Banff'17, and highest in Banff'13. Our data suggest that the clinical and histological heterogeneity of ABMR is inadequately represented in a binary classification system. This study provides a framework to evaluate the updates of the Banff classification and assess the impact of proposed changes on the number of cases and risk stratification. Two alternative classifications introducing an intermediate category are explored.

Preemptive HLA Antibody Screening Prior to Episodic Transplant Renal Biopsy Enables Early Diagnosis and Therapeutic Response in Asymptomatic Chronically Active Antibody-Related Rejection: A Case Report

Common management of renal transplant recipients includes episodic renal biopsy based on clinical findings such as an increase in proteinuria or serum creatinine. When antibody-related rejection is suspected from the renal biopsy, subsequent testing for donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) is performed. We instead performed preemptive screening of asymptomatic post–renal transplant recipients for DSAs prior to renal biopsy. In this case, a 30-year-old woman with a secondary transplant was positive for 61 anti-HLA antibodies of class I and class II, among which DQ2 was a DSA with a mean fluorescence index of 2039. The patient had a living kidney transplant 9 years earlier. She had never been diagnosed with rejection, her serum creatinine was around 1.0 mg/dL, and her proteinuria was negative. Following the positive DSA result, a renal biopsy was performed, and she was diagnosed as C4d-negative chronic-active antibody-mediated rejection (CAABMR) with a Banff score of cg1b, (g + ptc) ≥ 2, and C4d 0. Intravenous steroid pulse, deoxyspagarin, antithymocyte globulin, rituximab, and oral everolimus were administrated. The treatment resulted in a gradual decrease in the DSA, which became negative 1 year later. The patient’s serum creatinine remains around 1.0 mg/dL, and proteinuria remains negative. Treatments for advanced CAABMR are often expensive and ineffective. Our present case suggests that early detection and treatment through preemptive HLA antibody screening could improve the prognosis of renal transplants.

Inflammation in areas of fibrosis: The DeKAF prospective cohort.

Inflammation in areas of fibrosis (i-IFTA) in posttransplant biopsy specimens has been associated with decreased death-censored graft survival (DC-GS). Additionally, an i-IFTA score≥2 is part of the diagnostic criteria for chronic active TCMR (CA TCMR). We examined the impact of i-IFTA and t-IFTA (tubulitis in areas of atrophy) in the first biopsy for cause after 90days posttransplant (n=598); mean (SD) 1.7±1.4years posttransplant. I-IFTA, present in 196 biopsy specimens, was strongly correlated with t-IFTA, and Banff i. Of the 196, 37 (18.9%) had a previous acute rejection episode; 96 (49%) had concurrent i score=0. Unlike previous studies, i-IFTA=1 (vs 0) was associated with worse 3-year DC-GS: (i-IFTA=0, 81.7%, [95% CI 77.7 to 85.9%]); i-IFTA=1, 68.1%, [95% CI 59.7 to 77.6%]; i-IFTA=2, 56.1%, [95% CI 43.2 to 72.8%], i-IFTA=3, 48.5%, [95% CI 31.8 to 74.0%]). The association of i-IFTA with decreased DC-GS remained significant when adjusted for serum creatinine at the time of the biopsy, Banff i, ci and ct, C4d and DSA. T-IFTA was similarly associated with decreased DC-GS. Of these indication biopsies, those with i-IFTA≥2, without meeting other criteria for CA TCMR had similar postbiopsy DC-GS as those with CA TCMR. Those with i-IFTA=1 and t≥2, ti≥2 had postbiopsy DC-GS similar to CA TCMR. Biopsies with i-IFTA=1 had similar survival as CA TCMR when biopsy specimens also met Banff criteria for TCMR and/or AMR. Studies of i-IFTA and t-IFTA in additional cohorts, integrating analyses of Banff scores meeting criteria for other Banff diagnoses, are needed.

Reassessment of the clinical impact of preformed donor-specific anti-HLA-Cw antibodies in kidney transplantation.

Anti-denatured HLA-Cw antibodies are highly prevalent, whereas anti-native HLA-Cw antibodies seem to lead to random flow cytometry crossmatch results. We aimed to reassess crossmatch prediction for anti-HLA-Cw using 2 types of single antigen flow beads (classical beads and beads with diminished expression of denatured HLA), and to compare the pathogenicity of preformed anti-denatured and anti-native HLA-Cw antibodies in kidney transplantation. We performed 135 crossmatches with sera reacting against donor HLA-Cw (classical beads fluorescence ≥500); only 20.6% were positive. Forty-three (31.6%) were anti-denatured HLA antibodies (beads with diminished expression of denatured HLA fluorescence <300); all were crossmatch negative. The correlation between classical beads fluorescence and the crossmatch ratio was low (ρ=0.178), and slightly higher with beads with diminished expression of denatured HLA (ρ=0.289). We studied 52 kidney recipients with preformed anti-HLA-Cw donor-specific antibodies. Those with anti-native HLA antibodies experienced more acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejections (P=.006 and .03, respectively), and displayed a lower graft survival (P=.04). Patients with anti-native HLA-Cw antibodies more frequently had previous sensitizing events (P<.000001) or plausibility of their antibody profile according to known anti-native HLA-Cw eplets (P=.0001). Anti-native but not anti-denatured HLA-Cw antibodies are deleterious, which underscores the need for reagents with diminished expression of denatured HLA.

Cytomegalovirus prevention strategies and the risk of BK polyomavirus viremia and nephropathy.

Polyomavirus BK (BKV) is the cause of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy resulting in premature graft loss. There are limited data regarding the role of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and its prevention in developing BKV viremia and PVAN. In a prospective study, we analyzed 207 consecutive renal transplant recipients previously enrolled in 2 randomized trials evaluating different CMV prevention regimens with routine screening for BKV and CMV. Of these, 59 received valganciclovir and 100 valacyclovir prophylaxis; 48 patients were managed by preemptive therapy. At 3years, the incidence of BKV viremia and PVAN was 28% and 5%, respectively. CMV DNAemia developed in 55% and CMV disease in 6%. Both BKV viremia (42% vs 23% vs 21%, P=.006) and PVAN (12% vs 2% vs 2%, P=.011) were increased in patients treated with valganciclovir prophylaxis compared to valacyclovir and preemptive therapy. Using multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression, valganciclovir prophylaxis was independent predictor of BKV viremia (hazard ratio [HR]=2.38, P=.002) and PVAN (HR=4.73, P=.026). In contrast, the risk of subsequent BKV viremia was lower in patients with antecedent CMV DNAemia (HR=0.50, P=.018). These data suggest valganciclovir prophylaxis may be associated with increased risk of BKV viremia and PVAN. CMV DNAemia did not represent a risk for BKV.

Clinical Significance of Revised Banff Criteria in the Diagnosis of Antibody-Mediated Rejection

BackgroundThe diagnostic criteria of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) has been significantly changed since Banff 2013. The most important revision was adopting microvascular inflammation (MVI) as immunopathologic evidence for ABMR even in C4d-negative cases. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed previous allograft biopsy results and evaluated the impact of this change. MethodsWe reviewed results of 536 renal allograft biopsies at Severance Hospital during 2011 to 2013, which were diagnosed according to the Banff 2009 criteria. All biopsy results were reassessed according to the Banff 2017 criteria. ResultsAccording to the Banff 2009 criteria, antibody-mediated changes were observed in 48 cases out of the 536 allograft biopsies (9.0%). According to the Banff 2017 criteria, 28 additional cases (5.2%) were reclassified as antibody-mediated changes. Twenty-six of these cases were C4d-negative ABMR. The most frequent diagnostic finding in these cases was MVI comprising glomerulitis and peritubular capillaritis. Donor-specific antibodies were investigated in 14 of these cases, which revealed positive results in 12 cases. ConclusionThe incidence rate of ABMR has increased after the recent revision of the Banff criteria. The MVI in C4d-negative ABMR cases is the major cause for this increase.

Histological picture of antibody-mediated rejection without donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies: Clinical presentation and implications for outcome.

In this cohort study (n=935 transplantations), we investigated the phenotype and risk of graft failure in patients with histological criteria for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in the absence of circulating donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSA), and compared this to patients with definite ABMR and HLA-DSA-positivity. The histological picture did not differ between HLA-DSA-positive (n=85) and HLA-DSA-negative (n=123) cases of ABMR histology, apart from increased complement split product 4d (C4d) deposition in the peritubular capillaries in HLA-DSA-positive cases. Histology of ABMR without HLA-DSA was more transient than DSA-positive ABMR, and patients with ABMR histology without HLA-DSA had graft survival superior to that of HLA-DSA-positive patients, independent of concomitant T cell-mediated rejection (38.2%) or borderline changes (17.9%). Multivariate analysis showed that the risk of graft failure was not higher in patients with histological picture of ABMR (ABMRh ) in the absence of HLA-DSA, compared to patients without ABMRh . Despite an association between C4d deposition and HLA-DSA-positivity, using C4d deposition as alternative for the DSA criterion in the diagnosis of ABMR, as proposed in Banff 2017, did not contribute to the prognosis of graft function and graft failure. We concluded that biopsies with ABMRh but without detectable HLA-DSA represent a distinct, often transient phenotype with superior allograft survival.

Graft dysfunction in simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation (SPK): Results of concurrent kidney and pancreas allograft biopsies.

Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplants offer significant therapeutic advantages but present a diagnostic approach dilemma in the diagnosis of rejection. Because both organs are from the same donor, the kidney has been treated traditionally as the "sentinel" organ to biopsy, presumably representing the status of both allografts. Truly concurrent biopsy studies, however, are needed to confirm this hypothesis. We examined 101 concurrent biopsies from 70 patients with dysfunction in either or both organs. Results showed concurrent rejection in 23 of 57 (40%) of cases with rejection; 19 of 57 (33.5%) and 15 of 57 (26.5%) showed kidney or pancreas only rejection, respectively. The degree and type of rejection differed in the majority (13 of 23, 56.5%) of cases with concurrent rejection, with the pancreas more often showing higher rejection grade. Taking into account pancreas dysfunction, a positive kidney biopsy should correctly predict pancreas rejection in 86% of the instances. However, the lack of complete concordance between the 2 organs, the discrepancies in grade and type of rejection, and the tendency for higher rejection grades in concurrent or pancreas only rejections, all support the rationale for pancreas biopsies. The latter provide additional data on the overall status of the organ, as well as information on nonrejection-related pathologies.

Antibody-mediated rejection: New approaches in prevention and management.

Despite the success of desensitization protocols, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) remains a significant contributor to renal allograft failure in patients with donor-specific antibodies. Plasmapheresis and high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin have proved to be effective treatments to prevent and treat AMR, but irreversible injury in the form of transplant glomerulopathy can commonly manifest months to years later. There is an unmet need to improve the outcomes for patients at risk for AMR. Updated Banff criteria now take into account the increasing understanding of the complex and heterogeneous nature of AMR phenotypes, including the timing of rejection, subclinical and chronic AMR, C4d-negative AMR, and antibody-mediated vascular rejection. Treatment for AMR is not standardized, and there is little in the way of evidence-based treatment guidelines. Refining more precisely the mechanisms of injury responsible for different AMR phenotypes and establishing relevant surrogate endpoints to facilitate more informative studies will likely allow for more accurate determination of prognosis and efficacious intervention using new therapeutic approaches. In addition to plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin, a number of other add-on therapies have been tried in small studies without consistent benefit, including anti-CD20, proteasome inhibitors, complement inhibitors, anti-interleukin-6 receptor blockers, and immunoglobulin G-degrading enzyme of Streptococcus pyogenes (called IdeS).

C4d-negative antibody-mediated rejection: A pathologist's perspective and clinical outcome.

Banff'13 update included C4d-antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) as a separate entity responsible for graft dysfunction with limited clinical/prognostic implications. We present a retrospective study to determine the incidence and outcome of C4d-negative ABMR. A total of 987 renal allograft (RA) biopsies obtained from 987 RA recipients were studied from January 2013 to January 2016. All samples were subjected to light microscopy using standard stains and C4d immunohistochemistry on paraffin sections and reported according to modified Banff's criteria. Adequate biopsies with immunological injuries were categorized as Group 1: pure ABMR, Group 2: combined ABMR with concurrent T-cell-mediated rejection (TCR), and Group 3: pure TCR. Groups 1 and 2 were further subgrouped as C4d positive (Group 1a and 2a) or C4d negative (Group 1b and 2b). Graft function was measured by serum creatinine (SCr) level (mg/dL). Of the 987 biopsies, 43.3% (404) biopsies revealed immunological injury. Of these, 27.7% of the biopsies revealed pure ABMR (Group 1), 60.6% revealed combined ABMR with TCR (Group 2), and 11.3% revealed pure TCR (Group 3). The overall incidence of ABMR (pure ABMR + ABMR with TCR) was 36.27%, of which C4d-negative rejections were 18.48% and 18.7% in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively. The mean SCr at the end of three years follow-up in patients with C4d-negative rejections was comparatively higher. C4d-negative ABMR, recently included in Banff'13, has a low incidence, usually presents early after transplantation but carries better outcome than C4d-positive ABMR. However, further long-term studies are still required for knowing the clinical course over years.

Defining the phenotype of antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation: Advances in diagnosis of antibody injury.

The diagnostic criteria for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) are constantly evolving in light of the evidence. Inclusion of C4d-negative ABMR has been one of the major advances in the Banff Classification in recent years. Currently Banff 2015 classification requires evidence of donor specific antibodies (DSA), interaction between DSA and the endothelium, and acute tissue injury (in the form of microvasculature injury (MVI); acute thrombotic microangiopathy; or acute tubular injury in the absence of other apparent cause). In this article we review not only the ABMR phenotypes acknowledged in the most recent Banff classification, but also the phenotypes related to novel pathogenic antibodies (non-HLA DSA, antibody isoforms and subclasses, complement-binding functionality) and molecular diagnostic tools (gene transcripts, metabolites, small proteins, cytokines, and donor-derived cell-free DNA). These novel tools are also being considered for the prognosis and monitoring of treatment response. We propose that improved classification of ABMR based on underlying pathogenic mechanisms and outcomes will be an important step in identifying patient-centered therapies to extend graft survival.

Effects of DNA Methylation on Progression to Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy in Renal Allograft Biopsies: A Multi-Omics Approach.

Progressive fibrosis of the interstitium is the dominant final pathway in renal destruction in native and transplanted kidneys. Over time, the continuum of molecular events following immunological and nonimmunological insults lead to interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy and culminate in kidney failure. We hypothesize that these insults trigger changes in DNA methylation (DNAm) patterns, which in turn could exacerbate injury and slow down the regeneration processes, leading to fibrosis development and graft dysfunction. Herein, we analyzed biopsy samples from kidney allografts collected 24 months posttransplantation and used an integrative multi-omics approach to understand the underlying molecular mechanisms. The role of DNAm and microRNAs on the graft gene expression was evaluated. Enrichment analyses of differentially methylated CpG sites were performed using GenomeRunner. CpGs were strongly enriched in regions that were variably methylated among tissues, implying high tissue specificity in their regulatory impact. Corresponding to this methylation pattern, gene expression data were related to immune response (activated state) and nephrogenesis (inhibited state). Preimplantation biopsies showed similar DNAm patterns to normal allograft biopsies at 2 years posttransplantation. Our findings demonstrate for the first time a relationship among epigenetic modifications and development of interstitial fibrosis, graft function, and inter-individual variation on long-term outcomes.

Efficacy of Eculizumab Therapy for Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Recurrence and Antibody-Mediated Rejection Progress After Renal Transplantation With Preformed Donor-Specific Antibodies: Case Report

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) develops as the result of unregulated complement progression and precipitates de novo thrombotic microangiopathy. Plasma therapy is used to control the progression of the complement cascade, but that therapy is not effective in all patients and is accompanied by risk of infection and/or allergy. Eculizumab has been reported as an efficient therapy for aHUS. We report the case of a 35-year old woman who underwent effective eculizumab therapy for aHUS recurrence and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) progress after renal transplantation with preformed donor-specific antibodies (DSA). She developed end-stage renal disease due to suspicious IgA nephropathy at age 33 years. Kidney transplantation was performed at age 35 years, and aHUS recurred 2 weeks later, leading to the progressive hemolytic anemia and renal dysfunction. Therefore, she underwent plasma therapy several times. Because it was difficult to continue to plasma therapy for severe allergy, eculizumab was proposed as an alternate therapy. Treatment with eculizumab was initiated 36 days after renal transplantation. After 3 years of eculizumab treatment, and without plasma therapy, schistocytes decreased, haptoglobin increased to within normal limits, creatinine levels stabilized, and no further episodes of diarrhea were reported. At protocol biopsy 1 year after transplantation, she was diagnosed with C4d-negative subclinical AMR. However, her pathologic findings at follow-up biopsy 3 years after transplantation were recovered. We conclude that eculizumab alone, without plasma therapy, is sufficient to treat recurrence of aHUS and AMR due to DSA after renal transplantation and to maintain long-term graft function.

Anti-LG3 Antibodies Aggravate Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury and Long-Term Renal Allograft Dysfunction.

Pretransplant autoantibodies to LG3 and angiotensin II type 1 receptors (AT1R) are associated with acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients, whereas antivimentin autoantibodies participate in heart transplant rejection. Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) can modify self-antigenic targets. We hypothesized that ischemia-reperfusion creates permissive conditions for autoantibodies to interact with their antigenic targets and leads to enhanced renal damage and dysfunction. In 172 kidney transplant recipients, we found that pretransplant anti-LG3 antibodies were associated with an increased risk of delayed graft function (DGF). Pretransplant anti-LG3 antibodies are inversely associated with graft function at 1 year after transplantation in patients who experienced DGF, independent of rejection. Pretransplant anti-AT1R and antivimentin were not associated with DGF or its functional outcome. In a model of renal IRI in mice, passive transfer of anti-LG3 IgG led to enhanced dysfunction and microvascular injury compared with passive transfer with control IgG. Passive transfer of anti-LG3 antibodies also favored intrarenal microvascular complement activation, microvascular rarefaction and fibrosis after IRI. Our results suggest that anti-LG3 antibodies are novel aggravating factors for renal IRI. These results provide novel insights into the pathways that modulate the severity of renal injury at the time of transplantation and their impact on long-term outcomes.

(447) - C4d-Negative Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Lung Transplantation

(447) - C4d-Negative Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Lung Transplantation

(446) - Metabolic Profile of Broncho-Alveolar Lavage Fluid in Lung Transplant Recipients Suggests Potential Early Biomarkers of Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome

Purpose: The definition of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after lung transplantation (LT) has undergone revision as recognition of this entity has increased. Although considered a key criterion for the diagnosis of AMR, C4d deposition has been an inconsistent finding. We compared outcomes of LT recipients who developed C4d-negative AMR to those who developed C4d-positive AMR. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients transplanted between 1/2006 and 7/2015, and identified those who developed AMR defined as acute allograft dysfunction, DSA, and a lung injury pathology. We excluded those who did not have C4d staining at the time of diagnosis (n= 20). We grouped those who developed AMR into a C4d-positive cohort and a C4d-negative cohort and compared outcomes of the 2 groups using Kaplan-Meier method and the log rank test. Results: 37 patients developed AMR during the study period; 15 developed C4d-positive AMR and 22 developed C4d-negative AMR. All patients with AMR were treated with IVIG. Of these, 36 were treated with rituximab, 7 with bortezomib, and 9 with plasma exchange (PLEX) (Table 1). Survival and CLAD-free survival after the diagnosis of AMR were poor in both groups, and there was no significant difference in either survival or CLAD-free survival between the 2 groups (Figure 1). Conclusion: A large proportion of patients with AMR in this cohort did not have C4d deposition. However, there was no significant difference in outcome between those who had C4d-negative and those who had C4d-positive AMR. These findings suggest that C4d deposition may not be a necessary criterion for the diagnosis of AMR.

Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplant Based on the 2013 Banff Criteria: Single-Center Experience in Uruguay

BackgroundAcute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) diagnosis criteria have changed in recent consensus of Banff, with current evidence of C4d-negative AMR. Our objective was to evaluate incidence of AMR in renal transplantation according to Banff 2013 criteria and to examine the histological features and outcome. MethodsThis retrospective study involved all kidney transplants with histological diagnosis of acute rejection (AR) at our center between 2000 and 2014. All the biopsies with AR were re-assessed by a nephro-pathologist and classified by use of the Banff 2013 criteria. ResultsOf 205 kidney transplants, biopsy-proven AR was diagnosed in 25 cases (12%). Re-assessing them according to Banff 2013 criteria, AMR was diagnosed in 17 (8.3%) and represented 68% of the confirmed rejections. AMR diagnosis was performed on day 23 ± 26, with median of 11 days. From the 17 cases, 7 had concomitant T-cell–mediated rejection. All cases presented endothelial edema and acute tubular necrosis. Glomerulitis was found in 12 cases and capillaritis in 14. In 3, associated thrombotic micro-angiopathy (TMA) was found. Intimal and transmural arteritis was evidenced in 5 and 1 patient. In 2, transplant glomerulopathy was present. Seven of the 10 biopsies with C4d staining in the peri-tubular capillaries were positive. Twelve cases received plasmapheresis, 6 received gamma-globulin, and 6 received rituximab. After administration of anti-AMR therapy, 16 cases recovered renal function, reaching a serum creatinine level of 1.5 ± 0.6 mg %. Graft survival at 1 year was lower in the AMR group versus patients without AMR (81.9% vs 98.9%, log-rank test, P < .001). Risk factors for AMR were re-transplant (30% vs 7%, P = .02), HLA-DR mismatch (1.06 ± 0.65 vs 0.7 ± 0.6, P = .03), panel-reactive antibody (28% ± 33 vs 6.2 ± 13, P = .00), and delayed graft function (82% vs 30%, P = .00). ConclusionsAdapting the new Banff 2013 criteria increased the sensitivity of the diagnosis of ARM. Regarding our data, despite an adequate response to the therapy, it resulted in a worse graft survival by the first year of renal transplant.

The Revised (2013) Banff Classification for Antibody-Mediated Rejection of Renal Allografts: Update, Difficulties, and Future Considerations.

The Banff 2013 classification (Banff 2013) for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in renal allografts represents the first major revision of the original Banff classification for ABMR that was published in 2003. The main impetus for this revision was the need to include C4d-negative ABMR, although this revised classification contains a number of additional features based on findings reported from 2007 to 2013. Since its publication, several studies have examined the validity of different aspects of Banff 2013 and compared it to earlier (2003, 2007) versions of the Banff ABMR classification. Recent evidence, albeit limited, indicates that Banff 2013 represents an improvement over the previous versions, enhancing our ability to accurately diagnose cases of acute/active and chronic active ABMR on renal allograft biopsy. Molecular studies appear to justify the threshold value of glomerulitis plus peritubular capillaritis score ≥2 required by Banff 2013 for the diagnosis of C4d-negative ABMR; however, other aspects of the classification, including its overall interobserver reproducibility, the clinical significance of the category of C4d staining without evidence of rejection, and whether surrogate markers might potentially substitute for the requirement for the presence of donor-specific antibodies, require additional investigation.

Endothelial activation, lymphangiogenesis, and humoral rejection of kidney transplants

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is implicated in 45% of renal allograft failure and 57% of late allograft dysfunction. Peritubular capillary C4d is a specific but insensitive marker of ABMR. The 2013 Banff Conference ABMR revised criteria included C4d-negative ABMR with evidence of endothelial-antibody interaction. We hypothesized that endothelial activation and lymphangiogenesis are increased with C4d-negative ABMR and correlate with intragraft T-regulatory cells and T-helper 17. Seventy-four renal transplant biopsies were selected to include (a) ABMR with C4d Banff scores ≥2 (n = 35), (b) variable microvascular injury and C4d score 0-1 (n = 24), and (c) variable microvascular injury and C4d score = 0 (n = 15). Controls included normal preimplantation donor kidneys (n = 5). Immunohistochemistry for endothelial activation (P- and E-selectins [SEL]), lymphangiogenesis (D2-40), T-regulatory cells (FOXP3), and T-helper 17 (STAT3) was performed. Microvessel and inflammatory infiltrate density was assessed morphometrically in interstitium and peritubular capillaries. All transplants had significantly higher microvessel and lymph vessel density compared with normal. Increased expression of markers of endothelial activation predicted transplant glomerulopathy (P-SEL, P = .003). Increased P-SEL and D2-40 were associated with longer interval from transplant to biopsy (P = .005). All 3 markers were associated with increased interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy, and graft failure (P-SEL, P < .001; E-SEL, P = .0011; D2-40, P = .012). There was no association with the intragraft FOXP3/STAT3 ratio. We conclude that endothelial activation and lymphangiogenesis could represent a late response to injury leading to fibrosis and progression of kidney damage, and are independent of the intragraft FOXP3/STAT3 ratio. Our findings support the therapeutic potential of specifically targeting endothelial activation.