C-spine Immobilization Research Articles

Incidence of cervical spine injury in victims of dismounted blast: a systematic review

IntroductionDismounted blast has the potential to cause life-threatening injuries to multiple simultaneous casualties, including injury to the cervical spine (c-spine). Spinal immobilisation can be costly in terms of time and...

Lack of Association between Cervical Spine Injuries and Prehospital Immobilization: From Tradition to Evidence.

Background: Cervical spine (C-spine) trauma usually results from blunt injuries and is traditionally managed by prehospital spinal immobilization using a cervical collar. We sought to examine if prehospital C-spine immobilization is associated with actual C-spine injuries and what factors are associated with the decision to immobilize the C-spine. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed blunt trauma patients treated by Israeli Defense Force (IDF) medical teams from 2015 to 2020. Children, penetrating injuries, and non-threatening injuries were excluded. Demographic data, injury characteristics, and prehospital information were collected from the IDF Trauma Registry's electronic medical records and merged with corresponding hospital data from the Israeli National Trauma Registry. Results: Overall, 220 patients were included, with a mean age of 32 and a predominance of male patients (78%). Most injuries were due to motor vehicle collisions (77%). In total, 40% of the patients received a cervical collar. C-spine injuries were present in 8%, of which 50% were immobilized with a cervical collar. There were no significant differences in the incidences of C-spine injuries or disability outcomes with or without collar immobilization. The use of a collar was significantly associated with backboard immobilization (OR = 14.5, p < 0.001) and oxygen use (OR = 2.5, p = 0.032). Conclusions: Prehospital C-spine immobilization was not associated with C-spine injury or neurological disability incidences. C-spine immobilization by medical providers may be influenced by factors other than the suspected presence of a C-spine injury, such as the use of a backboard. Clear clinical guidelines for inexperienced medical providers are called for.

The performance of C-MAC videostylet versus D-Blade during tracheal intubation in patients with simulated cervical immobilization: A randomized comparative trial

ABSTRACT Background Concerning patients with suspected cervical spine (C-spine) fractures or other cervical pathologies, tracheal intubation must be done very carefully to avoid injury to the spinal cord. Methods Fifty-two patients within a range of 20–60 years old, and arranged for elective surgery, were indiscriminately allocated into two groups; Group S was intubated with the C MAC Videostylet (VS), whereas Group L was intubated by D blade Video Laryngoscope (VL) during cervical immobilization by Philadelphia collar. The first successful attempt duration, total number of intubation attempts, the total duration of the intubation, haemodynamic parameters, stress response of intubation, the degree of C-spine movement and complications were evaluated in both groups. Results Group L showed substantially shorter times for the first successful attempt (p-value <0.001) and the whole intubation procedure (p-value <0.001) compared to Group S. Group S had a significantly more total number of intubation attempts (p-value = 0.010). The haemodynamic parameters did not significantly differ throughout the measurements among groups. Regarding the blood cortisol measurements at different periods, there were statistically insignificant changes among the groups. Concerning the greatest alteration in C-spine angulation at the occiput-C1, C1-C2, and C2-C5 segments during laryngoscopy and intubation, there were statistically insignificant differences among groups. Conclusion The C MAC D-blade VL is superior to the VS in terms of the number and duration of intubation attempts during C-spine immobilization. Conversely, the VS showed comparable results to the D blade regarding C-spine motion and stress response.

A Ten-Year Retrospective Cohort Study on Neck Collar Immobilization in Trauma Patients with Head and Neck Injuries.

Background and Objectives: In the context of prehospital care, spinal immobilization is commonly employed to maintain cervical stability in head and neck injury patients. However, its use in cases of unclear consciousness or major trauma patients is often precautionary, pending the exclusion of unstable spinal injuries through appropriate diagnostic imaging. The impact of prehospital C-spinal immobilization in these specific patient populations remains uncertain. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital from January 2009 to May 2019, focusing on trauma patients suspected of head and neck injuries. The primary outcome assessed was in-hospital mortality. We employed multivariable logistic regression to investigate the relationship between prehospital C-spine immobilization and outcomes, while adjusting for various factors such as age, gender, type of traumatic brain injury, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), and activation of trauma team. Results: Our analysis encompassed 2733 patients. Among these, patients in the unclear consciousness group (GCS ≤ 8) who underwent C-spine immobilization exhibited a higher mortality rate than those without immobilization. However, there was no statistically significant difference in mortality among patients with alert consciousness (GCS > 8). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that advanced age (age ≥ 65), unclear consciousness (GCS ≤ 8), major traumatic injuries (ISS ≥ 16 and RTS ≤ 7), and the use of neck collars for immobilization (adjusted OR: 1.850, 95% CI: 1.240-2.760, p = 0.003) were significantly associated with an increased risk of mortality. Subgroup analysis indicated that C-spine immobilization was significantly linked to an elevated risk of mortality in older adults (age ≥ 65), patients with unclear consciousness (GCS ≤ 8), those with major traumatic injuries (ISS ≥ 16 and RTS ≤ 7), and individuals in shock (shock index > 1). Conclusions: While our findings do not advocate for the complete abandonment of neck collars in all suspected head and neck injury patients, our study suggests that prehospital cervical and spinal immobilization should be applied more selectively in certain head and neck injury populations. This approach is particularly relevant for older individuals (age ≥ 65), those with unclear consciousness (GCS ≤ 8), individuals experiencing major traumatic injuries (ISS ≥ 16 or RTS ≤ 7), and patients in a state of shock (shock index ≥ 1). Our study employs a retrospective cohort design, which may introduce selection bias. Therefore, in the future, there is a need for confirmation of our results through a two-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) arises, as this design is considered ideal for addressing this issue.

Trends in prehospital cervical collar utilization in trauma patients: Closer, but not there yet.

This study aims to assess the change in cervical spine (C-spine) immobilization frequency in trauma patients over time. We hypothesize that the frequency of unnecessary C-spine immobilization has decreased. A retrospective chart review of adult trauma patients transported to our American College of Surgeons-verified Level I trauma center from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2021, was performed. Emergency medical services documentation was manually reviewed to record prehospital physiology and the application of a prehospital cervical collar (c-collar). C-spine injuries were defined as cervical vertebral fractures and/or spinal cord injuries. Univariate and year-by-year trend analyses were used to assess changes in C-spine injury and immobilization frequency. Among 2906 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 12% sustained C-spine injuries, while 88% did not. Patients with C-spine injuries were more likely to experience blunt trauma (95% vs. 68%, p < 0.001), were older (46 years vs. 41 years, p < 0.001), and had higher Injury Severity Scores (31 vs. 18, p < 0.001). They also exhibited lower initial systolic blood pressures (108 mm Hg vs. 119 mm Hg, p < 0.001), lower heart rates (92 beats/min vs. 97 beats/min, p < 0.05), and lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores (9 vs. 11, p < 0.001). In blunt trauma, c-collars were applied to 83% of patients with C-spine injuries and 75% without; for penetrating trauma, c-collars were applied to 50% of patients with C-spine injuries and only 8% without. Among penetrating trauma patients with C-spine injury, all patients either arrived quadriplegic or did not require emergent neurosurgical intervention. The proportion of patients receiving a c-collar decreased in both blunt and penetrating traumas from 2014 to 2021 (blunt-82% in 2014 to 68% in 2021; penetrating-24% in 2014 to 6% in 2021). Unnecessary C-spine stabilization has decreased from 2014 to 2021. However, c-collars are still being applied to patients who do not need them, both in blunt and in penetrating trauma cases, while not being applied to patients who would benefit from them.

Recommendation for changes to the guidelines of trauma patients with potential spinal injury within a regional UK ambulance trust.

Spinal assessment and immobilisation has been a topic of debate for many years where, despite an emerging evidence base and the delivery of new guidance overseas, little has changed within UK pre-hospital practice. Since 2018, South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust has spent time working with local trauma networks and expertise from within the region and international colleagues to develop a set of C-spine assessment and immobilisation guidelines that reflect the current best available international evidence and significant changes in international pre-hospital practice from settings such as Scandinavia and Australasia. A specialist group was commissioned to review the topic of pre-hospital spinal immobilisation and explore potential for evidence-based improvement. In conjunction with local trauma networks, subject matter experts and a thorough review of recent literature, a series of recommendations were made in order to improve spinal care within the authoring trust. Seven recommendations were made, and an updated set of guidelines produced. These included the removal of semi-rigid collars from pre-hospital spinal immobilisation; the creation of two tiers of patients to ensure that the high-risk and low-risk populations are considered separately and an accompanying decision tool to safeguard both cohorts; an increased emphasis on the risk of spinal injury in the frail and older patient; an emphasis on spinal motion restriction rather than rigid immobilisation; an increased emphasis on self-extrication; and the use of a marker for emergency departments. An updated set of guidance has been produced using a combination of specialist and expert opinion alongside a literature review with close involvement of key stakeholders, both public and professional. The new guidance helps to ensure a patient-centred approach where each person is considered an individual with their risk of injury and management measures tailored to their specific needs.

Teaching the management of trauma patients through virtual reality.

Virtual reality (VR) fully immersive interactive video teaching (VR FIIT) allows learners to develop through observing and interacting with complex realistic environments, developing technical and nontechnical skills. One such complex clinical environment is managing a trauma patient. Despite the significant developments in managing these patients, foundation doctors are frequently highly anxious due to their limited knowledge and experience. The aim of this project was twofold; to improve foundation doctor performance of managing trauma patients and to reduce their associated anxiety, through the use of VR teaching. A total of 14 foundation doctors were divided into two groups. One group underwent departmental teaching. The second group underwent departmental teaching and VR FIIT. We assessed the doctors via two methods. First, time taken to complete tasks correctly in trauma simulations was compared. Second, the doctors completed a self-reported level-based assessment questionnaire regarding anxiety and stress around trauma calls. The VR FIIT intervention group were able to complete each task on average 118s faster than the standard group. The standard group missed essential tasks such as C-spine immobilisation. The VR FIIT group self-reported significantly lower levels of anxiety related to trauma calls. VR teaching improves foundation doctor performance at managing simulated major trauma patients and decreases foundation doctor anxiety towards management and exposure of these clinical situations.

Evaluating a novel, low-cost technique for cervical-spine immobilization for application in resource-limited LMICs: a non-inferiority trial.

Non-inferiority trial. Limited cervical spinal (c-spine) immobilization in resource-limited settings of LMICs suggests alternatives are necessary for patients with traumatic injuries. We propose a novel method of c-spine immobilization using folded towels. Washington University in St. Louis. Using non-inferiority trial design, thirty healthy patients (median age = 22) were enrolled to test the efficacy of folded towels in comparison with rigid cervical collars, foam neck braces, and no immobilization. We measured cervical range of motion (CROM) in six cardinal directions in seated and supine positions. A weighted composite score (CS) was generated to compare immobilization methods. A preserved fraction of 75% was determined for non-inferiority, corresponding to the difference between the median values for CROM between control (no immobilization) and c-collar states. C-collars reduce median CROM in six cardinal directions in seated and supine positions by an average of -36.83° seated (-17.75° supine) vs. no immobilization. Folded towels and foam neck braces reduced CROM by -27° seated (-16.75° supine) and -14.25° seated (-9.5° supine), respectively. Compared to a 25% non-inferiority margin (permitting an average 9.21° of cervical movement across six cardinal directions), the CS determined folded towels are non-inferior (CSseated = 0.89, CSsupine = 0.47). Foam neck braces are inferior (CSseated = 2.35, CSsupine = 2.10). CS > 1 surpassed the non-inferiority margin and were deemed inferior. Folded towels are a non-inferior means of immobilizing c-spine in extension and rotation, but not flexion, vs. c-collars. We propose folded towels could be trialed in combination with backboards to deliver affordable and effective prehospital TSCI management in resource-limited settings.

120 Cervical Spine Injury Immobilization and Management: Addressing the Gap in Knowledge and Improving Systems through Multi-Disciplinary &lt;i&gt;in situ&lt;/i&gt; Simulation in a Busy Emergency Department

Cervical spine (C-spine) injuries are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly in the elderly population The aims of the study were to identify clinician knowledge gaps when starting EM, create a simulation-based teaching program to address these weaknesses and to improve multi-disciplinary systems relating to C-spine injury immobilization and management.A sample of 20 clinicians finishing their EM rotation in April 2021 at Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, completed a survey listing conditions/procedures they would have appreciated simulation scenarios on as part of induction. A 30-minute C-spine simulation station was designed focussing on knowledge gaps identified, incorporating Canadian C-spine rules, immobilization, radiological investigation and treatment. Sessions were delivered About 70% of surveyed candidates included ‘C-spine’ within conditions/procedures they desired simulation teaching on. Candidate feedback suggested high levels of enjoyment with 100% of candidates scoring 7 or 8/8. The mean confidence of candidates before and after the session increased by 30.6% (52%–82.6%). 100% of candidates felt that the session was useful in improving day-to-day practice and 67.7% of candidates envisaged implementing teachings within the next week (96.8% within the next 3 months).In a busy department, it is important to prioritize education and address workforce knowledge gaps. Trauma and C-spine injury appear to be an area of under-confidence in junior clinicians starting in EM. Short

Comparison of direct laryngoscopy and video-assisted laryngoscopy in pediatric intensive care unit

Our objective was to compare video-assisted laryngoscopy (VAL) with direct laryngoscopy (DL) for glottic visualization in a pediatric intensive care unit in terms of the success rate in first attempts. Our study included patients aged from 1 month to 18 years who were admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit. We excluded patients with limited neck extension (C-spine immobilization, congenital abnormality), congenital anomalies (e.g., Pierre Robin syndrome, micrognathia, macroglossia), and recent airway surgery. Patients were premedicated before intubation. The time to intubation was defined as the time between the start of anesthesia and completion of intubation. The start of anesthetic induction was defined as the time the sedative was first administered. Completion of intubation was defined as the time that the end-tidal carbon dioxide tension was detected. We evaluated 120 of 135 intubations that met our inclusion criteria; 15 were excluded because in eight cases (53%) non-pediatric intensive care physicians made the initial attempts, and in seven cases (47%) the recorded intubation times were erroneous. We detected significantly higher POGO scores in the VAL group (p<0.001). VAL provided a fuller view of the glottis (Cormack and Lehane grade 1) than DL (p<0.001). Although the intubation attempts in the DL group were significantly higher (two or more attempts), no intubation failures occurred in either group.

Airway management in maxillofacial trauma.

Airway management of patients with maxillofacial trauma remains a challenging task for an anesthesiologist in the emergency and perioperative settings due to anatomical distortion. Detailed knowledge of maxillofacial and airway anatomy is desired for the correct diagnosis of extent and severity of the injury. Basic principles of advanced trauma life support protocols should be followed while managing such patients. Establishing unobstructed airway remains the top priority while maintaining C-spine immobilization and preventing aspiration. Although multiple options exist for securing the airway, a universal technique of airway management may not be applicable to all the patients. Hence, a high index of suspicion along with timely and skillful management is warranted. In this brief review, issues affecting the airway management in cases of maxillofacial trauma are addressed with the possible uses of a wide range of airway management devices available in emergency and elective scenarios.

Prehospital care for traumatic spinal cord injury by first responders in 8 sub-Saharan African countries and 6 other low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review.

IntroductionTraumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) constitutes a considerable portion of the global injury burden, disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Prehospital care can address TSCI morbidity and mortality, but emergency medical services are lacking in LMICs. The current standard of prehospital care for TSCI in sub-Saharan Africa and other LMICs is unknown.MethodsThis review sought to describe the state of training and resources for prehospital TSCI management in sub-Saharan Africa and other LMICs. Articles published between 1 January 1995 and 1 March 2020 were identified using PMC, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Inclusion criteria spanned first responder training programs delivering prehospital care for TSCI. Two reviewers assessed full texts meeting inclusion criteria for quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and extracted relevant characteristics to assess trends in the state of prehospital TSCI care in sub-Saharan Africa and other LMICs.ResultsOf an initial 482 articles identified, 23 met inclusion criteria, of which ten were set in Africa, representing eight countries. C-spine immobilization precautions for suspected TSCI patients is the most prevalent prehospital TSCI intervention for and is in every LMIC first responder program reviewed, except one. Numerous first responder programs providing TSCI care operate without C-collar access (n = 13) and few teach full spinal immobilization (n = 5). Rapid transport is most frequently reported as the key mortality-reducing factor (n = 11). Despite more studies conducted in the Southeast Asia/Middle East (n = 13), prehospital TSCI studies in Africa are more geographically diverse, but responder courses are shorter, produce fewer professional responders, and have limited C-collar availability.DiscussionDeficits in training and resources to manage TSCI highlights the need for large prospective trials evaluating alternative C-spine immobilization methods for TCSI that are more readily available across diverse LMIC environments and the importance of understanding resource variability to sustainably improve prehospital TSCI care.

An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter trial examining prehospital procedures in penetrating trauma patients.

BACKGROUNDPrehospital procedures (PHP) by emergency medical services (EMS) are performed regularly in penetrating trauma patients despite previous studies demonstrating no benefit. We sought to examine the influence of PHPs on outcomes in penetrating trauma patients in urban locations where transport to trauma center is not prolonged. We hypothesized that patients without PHPs would have better outcomes than those undergoing PHP.METHODSThis was an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma–sponsored, multicenter, prospective, observational trial of adults (18+ years) with penetrating trauma to the torso and/or proximal extremity presenting at 25 urban trauma centers. The impact of PHPs and transport mechanism on in-hospital mortality were examined.RESULTSOf 2,284 patients included, 1,386 (60.7%) underwent PHP. The patients were primarily Black (n = 1,527, 66.9%) males (n = 1,986, 87.5%) injured by gunshot wound (n = 1,510, 66.0%) with 34.1% (n = 726) having New Injury Severity Score of ≥16. A total of 1,427 patients (62.5%) were transported by Advanced Life Support EMS, 17.2% (n = 392) by private vehicle, 13.7% (n = 312) by police, and 6.7% (n = 153) by Basic Life Support EMS. Of the PHP patients, 69.1% received PHP on scene, 59.9% received PHP in route, and 29.0% received PHP both on scene and in route. Initial scene vitals differed between groups, but initial emergency department vitals did not. Receipt of ≥1 PHP increased mortality odds (odds ratio [OR], 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01–1.83; p = 0.04). Logistic regression showed increased mortality with each PHP, whether on scene or during transport. Subset analysis of specific PHP revealed that intubation (OR, 10.76; 95% CI, 4.02–28.78; p < 0.001), C-spine immobilization (OR, 5.80; 95% CI, 1.85–18.26; p < 0.01), and pleural decompression (OR, 3.70; 95% CI, 1.33–10.28; p = 0.01) had the highest odds of mortality after adjusting for multiple variables.CONCLUSIONPrehospital procedures in penetrating trauma patients impart no survival advantage and may be harmful in urban settings, even when performed during transport. Therefore, PHP should be forgone in lieu of immediate transport to improve patient outcomes.LEVEL OF EVIDENCEPrognostic, level III.

Cervical Injury Outcomes among Older Adults Admitted to an Inpatient Trauma Service.

Older adults are an increasing proportion of patients admitted to trauma services. Trauma in older adults' results from many mechanisms of injury with the distribution of mechanisms of injury among older adults different than those of younger adults. The acute management of these injuries may determine the patients' ability to return to independent living. It is known that prolonged immobilization of older patients results in deterioration of their functional status and increases the likelihood of hospital acquired complications, notably pneumonia, delirium, and loss of ambulation. We reviewed 213 patients aged 65 and older admitted to our trauma services who sustained cervical spine injuries that were either placed in c spine immobilization or were not to understand the outcomes associated with their mechanism of injury. The youngest patients (65-74 years) were proportionately more likely to have sustained high energy injuries associated with motor vehicle crashes (36%) with a mortality rate of 11.5%. The oldest age group (> 85 years) had a higher mortality rate from falls from standing injuries (31%). Patients discharged with a collar were more likely to return to independent living. In addition, 96% of the patients that died in the acute care setting were not in cervical collar immobilization. Patients under 85 years with a cervical spine injury should be placed in c-spine immobilization and aggressively managed with a multidisciplinary team approach. The older adult trauma population requires specialty care including rapid cervical spine evaluation and prescreening of functional status on admission. The NEXUS guideline should be enhanced for the older adult trauma population.

THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF CERVICAL SPINE IMMOBILIZATION IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH CERVICAL SPINE FRACTURES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

As both life expectancy and average population age continue to rise, so too does the incidence of cervical spine (c-spine) injuries. C-spine fractures are associated with high morbidity and mortality, but the question is how best to treat them? This review is to compare the safety and efficacy of c-spine immobilisation in a rigid collar with other treatment modalities in elderly population. Available literature was reviewed to determine how treatment efficacy is assessed, with particular focus on whether osseous union or fibrous non-bony union should be considered as a successful outcome. This study was designed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Pubmed/Medline databases were selected for analysis. When considering patients over the age of 65, it is unclear whether management with a collar is safer than operative management or immobilisation with HALO vest. However, amongst studies that further subdivide elderly patients according to age there is more of a consensus; it appears that in those under the age of 75, operative management is safer, whereas in those over the age of 85, immobilisation in a collar is associated with lower mortality rates. Between the ages of 75-85 there is less clarity. Osseous union occurs more commonly in patients managed operatively, but fibrous non-bony union was not associated with any adverse outcomes in these studies. Conclusion: At present, there are no randomised controlled trials that have tried to delineate whether management in a collar is safer or more effective than other treatments such as HALO vest or operative fixation. However, evidence from various cohort studies does suggest that “elderly” patients with c-spine fractures should not be considered as one homogenous cohort, but should instead be subdivided according to age. Interestingly, these studies suggest that fibrous non-bony union may be an adequate treatment outcome in older. Further research into this complex field is required. Keywords: Trauma, elderly care, spinal fractures, treatment outcome, survival rate

Pragmatic Strategy Empowering Paramedics to Assess Low-Risk Trauma Patients With the Canadian C-Spine Rule and Selectively Transport Them Without Immobilization: Protocol for a Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial.

BackgroundEach year, half a million patients with a potential neck (c-spine) injury are transported to Ontario emergency departments (EDs). Less than 1.0% (1/100) of these patients have a neck bone fracture. Even less (1/200, 0.5%) have a spinal cord injury or nerve damage. Currently, paramedics transport all trauma victims (with or without an injury) by ambulance using a backboard, cervical collar, and head immobilizers. Importantly, prolonged immobilization is often unnecessary; it causes patient discomfort and pain, decreases community access to paramedics, contributes to ED crowding, and is very costly. We therefore developed the Canadian C-Spine Rule (CCR) for alert and stable trauma patients. This decision rule helps ED physicians and triage nurses to safely and selectively remove immobilization, without x-rays and missed injury. We successfully taught Ottawa paramedics to use the CCR in the field in a single-center study.ObjectiveThis study aimed to improve patient care and health system efficiency and outcomes by allowing paramedics to assess eligible low-risk trauma patients with the CCR and selectively transport them without immobilization to the ED.MethodsWe propose a pragmatic stepped-wedge cluster randomized design with health economic evaluation, designed collaboratively with knowledge users. Our 36-month study will consist of a 12-month setup and training period (year 1), followed by the stepped-wedge trial (year 2) and a 12-month period for study completion, analyses, and knowledge translation. A total of 12 Ontario paramedic services of various sizes distributed across the province will be randomly allocated to one of three sequences. Paramedic services in each sequence will cross from the control condition (usual care) to the intervention condition (CCR implementation) at intervals of 3 months until all communities have crossed to the intervention. Data will be collected on all eligible patients in each paramedic service for a total duration of 12 months. A major strength of our design is that each community will have implemented the CCR by the end of the study.ResultsInterim results are expected in December 2019 and final results in 2020. If this multicenter trial is successful, we expect the Ontario Ministry of Health will recommend that paramedics evaluate all eligible patients with the CCR in the Province of Ontario.ConclusionsWe conservatively estimate that in Ontario, more than 60% of all eligible trauma patients (300,000 annually) could be transported safely and comfortably, without c-spine immobilization devices. This will significantly reduce patient pain and discomfort, paramedic intervention times, and ED length of stay, thereby improving access to paramedics and ED care. This could be achieved rapidly and with lower health care costs compared with current practices (possible cost saving of Can $36 [US $25] per immobilization or Can $10,656,000 [US $7,335,231] per year).Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02786966; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02786966.International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)DERR1-10.2196/16966

Immobilisation in occipital condyle fractures: A systematic review

ObjectivesThe objectives of this review are to determine the level of evidence for the management of OCF, compare outcomes of different immobilisation, and to review the prognosis. Patients and methodsA literature search was conducted using 3 databases (MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE). All papers between 1940 and July 2017 were screened using PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were patients with a confirmed diagnosis of occipital condyle fracture(s) on CT managed with any form of immobilisation with no age restriction. Primary outcome was clinical improvement in symptoms or Neck Disability Index. MINORS and OCEBM level was assigned to each study. Results25 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies used a single form of C-spine immobilisation support (58%) with a semi rigid collar and halo device being the most common. From these studies, the average length of time for immobilisation was 11.7 weeks, 9 weeks and 8.3 weeks for halo, semi-rigid and rigid cervical collars respectively. Neuro deficit was found in 20.3% of patients. OCEBM level of evidence and MINORS score was low. ConclusionManagement of OCF is associated with low level of evidence. Further studies are needed to determine optimal management of these under-diagnosed fractures.

Is C-spine immobilisation in trauma an out-dated practice?

Is C-spine immobilisation in trauma an out-dated practice?

Ice-man Down: Using Simulation to Practice the Safe Extrication of Collapsed Hockey Players in a Confined Space.

Sporting event emergencies are common among both spectators and players, with unique sets of challenges associated with patient extrication in unfamiliar and chaotic environments. It is critical for sports physicians and trainers to deliberately train and prepare for emergent situations with limited resources during athletic events. One of the most difficult, yet commonly encountered challenges is determining when and how to safely remove an injured player’s helmet and sporting equipment, particularly if a spinal injury is highly suspected.We created a high-fidelity simulation case to practice the safe extrication of a hockey player who collapses on the bench in the player’s box, a space-restricted environment. The patient is a 25-year-old male hockey player who becomes unresponsive after a syncopal episode in the player’s box, and subsequently transferred to a medical center for further evaluation. Critical actions include extrication of the player at the scene, diagnosis of syncope, placement of the unconscious player on a backboard with cervical-spine precautions, removal of the player’s faceguard, removing the player off the ice, checking the electrocardiogram and glucose level, and transferring the player to a controlled environment. The learning objectives were to identify, evaluate, and manage the reversible causes of syncope, and demonstrate appropriate techniques for the optimal removal of sports equipment. Learner assessment was based on participation in the scenario and debriefing learners after the simulation.Post-simulation debriefing revealed that participants highly appreciated practicing not-so-commonly encountered hockey-related emergencies. Athletic trainers and emergency providers were able to effectively practice their management of the unresponsive hockey player. The participants were also able to deliberately practice their teamwork and communications skills with their peers. Learning points include proper c-spine immobilization techniques in a tight space and indication for gear-removal in an unconscious patient.As hockey continues to gain popularity, this simulation case will prepare athletic trainers and emergency providers to better address the reversible causes for syncope in hockey players, as well as safely and effectively extricate injured players from space-limiting sporting environments.

An in-situ simulation-based educational outreach project for pediatric trauma care in a rural trauma system

BackgroundOutcome disparities between urban and rural pediatric trauma patients persist, despite regionalization of trauma systems. Rural patients are initially transported to the nearest emergency department (ED), where pediatric care is infrequent. We aim to identify educational intervention targets and increase provider experience via pediatric trauma simulation. MethodsProspective study of simulation-based pediatric trauma resuscitation was performed at three community EDs. Level one trauma center providers facilitated simulations, providing educational feedback. Provider performance comfort and skill with tasks essential to initial trauma care were assessed, comparing pre-/postsimulations. Primary outcomes were: 1) improved comfort performing skills, and 2) team performance during resuscitation. ResultsProvider comfort with the following improved (p-values <0.05): infant airway, infant IV access, blood administration, infant C-spine immobilization, chest tube placement, obtaining radiographic images, initiating transport, and Broselow tape use. The proportion of tasks needing improvement decreased: 42% to 27% (p-value=0.001). Most common deficiencies were: failure to obtain additional history (75%), beginning secondary survey (58.33%), log rolling/examining the back (66.67%), calling for transport (50%), calculating medication dosages (50%). ConclusionsSimulation-based education improves provider comfort and performance. Comparison of patient outcomes to evaluate improvement in pediatric trauma care is warranted. Level of evidence ratingIV.