C-peptide Loss Research Articles

Response to Letter to the Editor from Hao and Xue: "Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Autoimmune Diabetes Mellitus Is Characterized by C-peptide Loss and Pancreatic Atrophy".

Response to Letter to the Editor from Hao and Xue: "Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Autoimmune Diabetes Mellitus Is Characterized by C-peptide Loss and Pancreatic Atrophy".

Ustekinumab for type 1 diabetes in adolescents: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized phase 2 trial

Immunotherapy targeting the autoimmune process in type 1 diabetes (T1D) can delay the loss of β-cells but needs to have minimal adverse effects to be an adjunct to insulin in the management of T1D. Ustekinumab binds to the shared p40 subunit of interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23, targeting development of T helper 1 cells and T helper 17 cells (TH1 and TH17 cells) implicated in the pathogenesis of T1D. We conducted a double-blind, randomized controlled trial of ustekinumab in 72 adolescents aged 12–18 years with recent-onset T1D. Treatment was well tolerated with no increase in adverse events. At 12 months, β-cell function, measured by stimulated C-peptide, was 49% higher in the intervention group (P = 0.02), meeting the prespecified primary outcome. Preservation of C-peptide correlated with the reduction of T helper cells co-secreting IL-17A and interferon-γ (TH17.1 cells, P = 0.04) and, in particular, with the reduction in a subset of TH17.1 cells co-expressing IL-2 and granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (IL-2+ GM-CSF+ TH17.1 cells, P = 0.04). A significant fall in β-cell-targeted (proinsulin-specific) IL-17A-secreting T cells was also seen (P = 0.0003). Although exploratory, our data suggest a role for an activated subset of TH17.1 cells in T1D that can be targeted with minimal adverse effects to reduce C-peptide loss, which requires confirmation in a larger study. (International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Registry: ISRCTN 14274380).

Effect of Immunotherapy on C-peptide Levels in Patients With Type I Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Type 1 diabetes mellitus is an autoimmune condition characterized by insulin deficiency resulting from loss of function of beta cells in the pancreas, leading to hyperglycemia and associated long-term systemic complications and even death. Immunotherapy demonstrates beta cell function-preserving potential; however, its impact on C-peptide levels, a definitive biomarker of beta cell function, and endogenous insulin secretion remain unclear. A systematic review of various immunotherapeutic interventions is hence needed for a comprehensive assessment of their effectiveness as well as identifying research gaps and influencing future research and clinical decisions. An extensive literature search was done in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases using precise keywords and filters to identify relevant studies. Three independent reviewers assessed eligibility according to predetermined eligibility criteria, and data was extracted. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool (RoB 2.0) was used to evaluate the quality and validity of the included studies. A senior reviewer resolved discrepancies and differences of opinion between independent reviewers. A total of 11 studies were included, with 1464 study participants. Both Phase II and III trials were included. Within the included studies, four studies assessed the anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody otelixizumab as an intervention. Another anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody, teplizumab, was assessed as an intervention in four studies, whereas two studies assessed the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab and one study assessed abatacept as its interventional drug. Otelixizumab demonstrated benefits at higher doses but was associated with adverse effects like Ebstein-Barr virus reactivation and cytomegalovirus infection, while at lower doses it failed to show a significant difference in C-peptide levels or glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Teplizumab, on the other hand, showed promise in reducing C-peptide loss and exogenous insulin requirements and was associated with adverse events such as rash, lymphopenia, urinary tract infection, and cytokine release syndrome. However, these reactions were only associated with therapy initiation, and they subsided on their own. Rituximab improved C-peptide responses, and abatacept therapy demonstrated reduced loss of C-peptide, improved C-peptide levels, and lowered HbA1c. Teplizumab, rituximab, otelixizumab, and abatacept show potential for preserving beta cell function by reducing C-peptide loss in patients with type I diabetes mellitus. However, careful monitoring of adverse reactions, particularly viral infections and cytokine release syndrome, is necessary for the safe implementation of these therapies.

Repressing miR-23a promotes the transdifferentiation of pancreatic α cells to β cells via negatively regulating the expression of SDF-1α.

Pancreatic β-cell failure is a pathological feature in type 1 diabetes. One promising approach involves inducing transdifferentiation of related pancreatic cell types, specifically α cells that produce glucagon. The chemokine stromal cell-derived factor-1 alpha (SDF-1α) is implicated in pancreatic α-to-β like cell transition. Here, the serum level of SDF-1α was lower in T1D with C-peptide loss, the miR-23a was negatively correlated with SDF-1α. We discovered that exosomal miR-23a, secreted from β cells, functionally downregulates the expression of SDF-1α, leading to increased Pax4 expression and decreased Arx expression in vivo. Adenovirus-vectored miR-23a sponge and mimic were constructed to further explored the miR-23a on pancreatic α-to-β like cell transition in vitro, which yielded results consistent with our cell-based assays. Suppression of miR-23a upregulated insulin level and downregulated glucagon level in STZ-induced diabetes mice models, effectively promoting α-to-β like cell transition. Our findings highlight miR-23a as a new therapeutic target for regenerating pancreatic β cells from α cells.

Preserved C-peptide is common and associated with higher time in range in Chinese type 1 diabetes.

The aim of this study is to determine the residual C-peptide level and to explore the clinical significance of preserved C-peptide secretion in glycemic control in Chinese individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D). A total of 534 participants with T1D were enrolled and divided into two groups, low-C-peptide group (fasting C-peptide ≤10 pmol/L) and preserved-C-peptide group (fasting C-peptide >10 pmol/L), and clinical factors were compared between the two groups. In 174 participants who were followed, factors associated with C-peptide loss were also identified by Cox regression. In addition, glucose metrics derived from intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring were compared between individuals with low C-peptide and those with preserved C-peptide in 178 participants. The lack of preserved C-peptide was associated with longer diabetes duration, glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody, and higher daily insulin doses, after adjustment {OR, 1.10 [interquartile range (IQR), 1.06-1.14]; OR, 0.46 (IQR, 0.27-0.77); OR, 1.04 (IQR, 1.02-1.06)}. In the longitudinal analysis, the percentages of individuals with preserved C-peptide were 71.4%, 56.8%, 71.7%, 62.5%, and 22.2% over 5 years of follow-up. Preserved C-peptide was also associated with higher time in range after adjustment of diabetes duration [62.4 (IQR, 47.3-76.6) vs. 50.3 (IQR, 36.2-63.0) %, adjusted P = 0.003]. Our results indicate that a high proportion of Chinese patients with T1D had preserved C-peptide secretion. Meanwhile, residual C-peptide was associated with favorable glycemic control, suggesting the importance of research on adjunctive therapy to maintain β-cell function in T1D.

Age of Diagnosis Does Not Alter the Presentation or Progression of Robustly Defined Adult-Onset Type 1 Diabetes.

To determine whether presentation, progression, and genetic susceptibility of robustly defined adult-onset type 1 diabetes (T1D) are altered by diagnosis age. We compared the relationship between diagnosis age and presentation, C-peptide loss (annual change in urine C-peptide-creatinine ratio [UCPCR]), and genetic susceptibility (T1D genetic risk score [GRS]) in adults with confirmed T1D in the prospective StartRight study, 1,798 adults with new-onset diabetes. T1D was defined in two ways: two or more positive islet autoantibodies (of GAD antibody, IA-2 antigen, and ZnT8autoantibody) irrespective of clinical diagnosis (n = 385) or one positive islet autoantibody and a clinical diagnosis of T1D (n = 180). In continuous analysis, age of diagnosis was not associated with C-peptide loss for either definition of T1D (P > 0.1), with mean (95% CI) annual C-peptide loss in those diagnosed before and after 35 years of age (median age of T1D defined by two or more positive autoantibodies): 39% (31-46) vs. 44% (38-50) with two or more positive islet autoantibodies and 43% (33-51) vs. 39% (31-46) with clinician diagnosis confirmed by one positive islet autoantibody (P > 0.1). Baseline C-peptide and T1D GRS were unaffected by age of diagnosis or T1D definition (P > 0.1). In T1D defined by two or more autoantibodies, presentation severity was similar in those diagnosed before and after 35 years of age: unintentional weight loss, 80% (95% CI 74-85) vs. 82% (76-87); ketoacidosis, 24% (18-30) vs. 19% (14-25); and presentation glucose, 21 mmol/L (19-22) vs. 21 mmol/L (20-22) (all P ≥ 0.1). Despite similar presentation, older adults were less likely to be diagnosed with T1D, insulin-treated, or admitted to hospital. When adult-onset T1D is robustly defined, the presentation characteristics, progression, and T1D genetic susceptibility are not altered by age of diagnosis.

The effect of age on longitudinal measures of beta cell function and insulin sensitivity during the progression of early stage type 1 diabetes

Aim/hypothesisThe risk of progressing from autoantibody positivity to type 1 diabetes is inversely related to age. Separately, whether age influences patterns of C-peptide loss or changes in insulin sensitivity in autoantibody-positive individuals who progress to stage 3 type 1 diabetes is unclear.MethodsBeta cell function and insulin sensitivity were determined by modelling of OGTTs performed in 658 autoantibody-positive participants followed longitudinally in the Diabetes Prevention Trial–Type 1 (DPT-1). In this secondary analysis of DPT-1 data, time trajectories of beta cell function and insulin sensitivity were analysed in participants who progressed to type 1 diabetes (progressors) to address the impact of age on patterns of metabolic progression to diabetes.ResultsAmong the entire DPT-1 cohort, the highest discriminant age for type 1 diabetes risk was 14 years, with participants aged <14 years being twice as likely to progress to type 1 diabetes as those aged ≥14 years. At study entry, beta cell glucose sensitivity was impaired to a similar extent in progressors aged <14 years and progressors aged ≥14 years. From study entry to stage 3 type 1 diabetes onset, beta cell glucose sensitivity and insulin sensitivity declined in both progressor groups. However, there were no significant differences in the yearly rate of decline in either glucose sensitivity (−13.7 [21.2] vs −11.9 [21.5] pmol min−1 m−2 [mmol/l]−1, median [IQR], p=0.52) or insulin sensitivity (−22 [37] vs −14 [40] ml min−1 m−2, median [IQR], p=0.07) between progressors aged <14 years and progressors aged ≥14 years.Conclusions/interpretationOur data indicate that during progression to stage 3 type 1 diabetes, rates of change in declining glucose and insulin sensitivity are not significantly different between progressors aged <14 years and progressors aged ≥14 years. These data suggest there is a predictable course of declining metabolic function during the progression to type 1 diabetes that is not influenced by age.Graphical abstract

10-OR: Combination Therapy with Anti-CD3 Antibody and Harmine plus Exendin-4 Enhances Remission from Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes.

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) results from loss of both immune tolerance and functional β-cells. Administration of harmine (H) plus exendin-4 (E) markedly induces human β-cell expansion. Anti-CD3 antibody treatment reduces C-peptide loss in T1D patients. Here, we tested whether combination therapy with anti-CD3 antibody and H+E enhances T1D remission in non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice. First, we tested whether H+E protects human β-cells against inflammation and ER stress. We found that H+E, but not the drugs alone, significantly reduced both thapsigargin- and cytokine-induced human β-cell apoptosis. Single-cell RNAseq of human islets treated with cytokines and H+E showed reduced IL1β and IFNγ signaling in β-cells. Apoptosis genes such as CYLD and RIPK1 were downregulated and prosurvival genes such as HIF1A and VEGFA were upregulated in β-cells of H+E-treated islets. Next, treatment of early-onset diabetic NOD mice with H+E (daily ip) for 8 weeks improved glucose homeostasis but failed to induce long-lasting immune tolerance and T1D remission. Therefore, we next treated early-onset diabetic NOD mice with low-dose anti-CD3 antibody daily for 3 days (40µg/day) followed by 8 weeks treatment with H+E or vehicle (V) (Alzet pumps) . Treatment with anti-CD3 and H+E eliminated hyperglycemia in 100% of the mice vs. only 20% remission in anti-CD3 and V-treated mice. CD3+ T cell numbers were significantly and similarly reduced (∼50%) in mice treated with H+E or V. Preliminary results indicate that activated T cells in pancreatic lymph nodes (PLNs) and islet insulitis were significantly reduced, and T regulatory cells in spleen and PLNs were increased in H+E-treated mice. TUNEL+ β-cells were decreased and Ki67+ β-cells were increased in the pancreas of H+E-treated mice. Collectively, these results indicate that combination therapy with low-dose anti-CD3 antibody and H+E enhances T1D remission in diabetic NOD mice by increasing β-cell viability and favoring immune tolerance. Disclosure G.Lu: None. R.Kang: None. Y.Li: None. P.Wang: None. C.Rosselot: None. R.J.Devita: None. A.F.Stewart: None. A.Garcia-ocana: Consultant; Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. Funding NIH DK105015

Baseline Assessment of Circulating MicroRNAs Near Diagnosis of Type 1 Diabetes Predicts Future Stimulated Insulin Secretion

Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease resulting in severely impaired insulin secretion. We investigated whether circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) are associated with residual insulin secretion at diagnosis and predict the severity of its future decline. We studied 53 newly diagnosed subjects enrolled in placebo groups of TrialNet clinical trials. We measured serum levels of 2,083 miRNAs, using RNA sequencing technology, in fasting samples from the baseline visit (<100 days from diagnosis), during which residual insulin secretion was measured with a mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT). Area under the curve (AUC) C-peptide and peak C-peptide were stratified by quartiles of expression of 31 miRNAs. After adjustment for baseline C-peptide, age, BMI, and sex, baseline levels of miR-3187-3p, miR-4302, and the miRNA combination of miR-3187-3p/miR-103a-3p predicted differences in MMTT C-peptide AUC/peak levels at the 12-month visit; the combination miR-3187-3p/miR-4723-5p predicted proportions of subjects above/below the 200 pmol/L clinical trial eligibility threshold at the 12-month visit. Thus, miRNA assessment at baseline identifies associations with C-peptide and stratifies subjects for future severity of C-peptide loss after 1 year. We suggest that miRNAs may be useful in predicting future C-peptide decline for improved subject stratification in clinical trials.

Factors Associated With the Decline of C-Peptide in a Cohort of Young Children Diagnosed With Type 1 Diabetes.

Understanding factors involved in the rate of C-peptide decline is needed to tailor therapies for type 1 diabetes (T1D). Evaluate factors associated with rate of C-peptide decline after a T1D diagnosis in young children. Observational study. Academic centers. A total of 57 participants from the Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) study who were enrolled at 3 months of age and followed until T1D, and 56 age-matched children diagnosed with T1D in the community. A mixed meal tolerance test was used to measure the area under the curve (AUC) C-peptide at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postdiagnosis. Factors associated with rate of C-peptide decline during the first 2 years postdiagnosis were evaluated using mixed effects models, adjusting for age at diagnosis and baseline C-peptide. Adjusted slopes of AUC C-peptide decline did not differ between TEDDY subjects and community controls (P = 0.21), although the former had higher C-peptide baseline levels. In univariate analyses combining both groups (n = 113), younger age, higher weight and body mass index z-scores, female sex, an increased number increased number of islet autoantibodies, and IA-2A or ZnT8A positivity at baseline were associated with a higher rate of C-peptide loss. Younger age, female sex, and higher weight z-score remained significant in multivariate analysis (all P < 0.02). At 3 months after diagnosis, higher HbA1c became an additional independent factor associated with a higher rate of C-peptide decline (P < 0.01). Younger age at diagnosis, female sex, higher weight z-score, and HbA1c were associated with a higher rate of C-peptide decline after T1D diagnosis in young children.

Plasma circulating miR-23~27~24 clusters correlate with the immunometabolic derangement and predict C-peptide loss in children with type 1 diabetes.

We aimed to analyse the association between plasma circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) and the immunometabolic profile in children with type 1 diabetes and to identify a composite signature of miRNAs/immunometabolic factors able to predict type 1 diabetes progression. Plasma samples were obtained from children at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (n = 88) and at 12 (n = 32) and 24 (n = 30) months after disease onset and from healthy control children with similar sex and age distribution (n = 47). We quantified 60 robustly expressed plasma circulating miRNAs by quantitative RT-PCR and nine plasma immunometabolic factors with a recognised role at the interface of metabolic and immune alterations in type 1 diabetes. Based on fasting C-peptide loss over time, children with type 1 diabetes were stratified into the following groups: those who had lost >90% of C-peptide compared with diagnosis level; those who had lost <10% of C-peptide; those showing an intermediate C-peptide loss. To evaluate the modulation of plasma circulating miRNAs during the course of type 1 diabetes, logistic regression models were implemented and the correlation between miRNAs and immunometabolic factors was also assessed. Results were then validated in an independent cohort of children with recent-onset type 1 diabetes (n = 18). The prognostic value of the identified plasma signature was tested by a neural network-based model. Plasma circulating miR-23~27~24 clusters (miR-23a-3p, miR-23b-3p, miR-24-3p, miR-27a-3p and miR-27b-3p) were upmodulated upon type 1 diabetes progression, showed positive correlation with osteoprotegerin (OPG) and were negatively correlated with soluble CD40 ligand, resistin, myeloperoxidase and soluble TNF receptor in children with type 1 diabetes but not in healthy children. The combination of plasma circulating miR-23a-3p, miR-23b-3p, miR-24-3p, miR-27b-3p and OPG, quantified at disease onset, showed a significant capability to predict the decline in insulin secretion 12months after disease diagnosis in two independent cohorts of children with type 1 diabetes. We have pinpointed a novel miR-23a-3p/miR-23b-3p/miR-24-3p/miR-27b-3p/OPG plasma signature that may be developed into a novel blood-based method to better stratify patients with type 1 diabetes and predict C-peptide loss.

253-OR: Circulating Neutrophil Numbers Increase with Age, but Are Not a Biomarker of T1D Risk

Investigations into the role of the neutrophil in type 1 diabetes (T1D) have provided controversial results. It is thus essential to understand how neutrophils change with age and if these numbers are linked by T1D. To do this, we utilized whole blood count data from our database, which includes 2619 unique individuals, pancreata slices from nPOD donors, and data points from the Neulasta in T1D clinical trial, NCT00662519. We first examined changes in neutrophils, total white blood cells (WBC), and lymphocytes in individuals with T1D, T2D, controls, and first and second-degree relatives. One way ANOVA showed no significant differences in neutrophils or other WBCs between groups (p&amp;gt;0.05). To account for age-specific effects, we built a quantile regression model using only the control subjects. With this model, a significant age association for neutrophil count was detected and repeated in each clinical group, indicating that age-matching is essential. Comparisons across groups showed that age-normalized neutrophil counts were no different between individuals with T1D, at-risk for T1D, and controls (p&amp;gt;0.05, Mann-Whitney test). We also enumerated neutrophil numbers within the endocrine and exocrine regions of the pancreas. We assessed pancreata from 51 organ donors with and without T1D: there were no observed differences between the groups (p&amp;gt;0.05, one-way ANOVA). Finally, data from the Neulasta trial demonstrated an increase in neutrophil numbers, but no change in the rate of C-peptide loss. We interrogated granulocytic, T cell, and dendritic cell profiles post-Neulasta to determine if changes in these subsets were reflective of treatment effects. While there was an increase in neutrophils immediately after Neulasta, changes did not persist outside of the treatment window. Other blood cell types were not responsive to Neulasta. Together, these data show that neutrophil numbers increase with age and when age correction is applied, the neutrophil is not a reliable biomarker of T1D. Disclosure A. Lin: None. D.J. Perry: None. D. Schatz: None. T.M. Brusko: Board Member; Self; OneVax, LLC. Consultant; Self; Caladrius Biosciences, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; CSL Behring. M.A. Atkinson: None. M.J. Haller: Advisory Panel; Self; SAB Biotherapeutics, Inc. C.E. Mathews: None.

212-OR: Factors Associated with Decline of C-Peptide in a Cohort of Young Children Diagnosed with Type 1 Diabetes

Preservation of C-peptide after diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (T1D) is associated with lower risk of both hypoglycemia and long-term microvascular complications. The decline of C-peptide after T1D onset is highly variable among subjects. The goal of this study was to evaluate factors associated with the rate of C-peptide decline. TEDDY participants identified at birth with high-risk HLA genotype and followed regularly until T1D diagnosis (n=70) and 60 age-matched children diagnosed with T1D in the community (median age at diagnosis = 6.7 years, IQR 5.1-7.9) were enrolled in a 2-year follow-up with mixed meal tolerance tests at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Mixed effects models for repeated measures were used adjusting for age at diagnosis and C-peptide at baseline. In univariate analyses, factors associated with rate of C-peptide loss included sex, age at diagnosis, baseline BMI, AUC C-peptide, HbA1c, IA-2A positivity and ZnT8A positivity. Four of these 7 factors remained significant in multivariate analysis (all p ≤ 0.037, see Table). Younger age at diagnosis, higher HbA1c, IA-2A positivity and ZnT8A positivity were associated with higher rate of C-peptide decline in this young cohort of children diagnosed with T1D. Disclosure A. Steck: None. X. Liu: None. J. Krischer: None. M.J. Haller: Advisory Panel; Self; Pancreum, SAB Biotherapeutics. R. Veijola: None. B. Akolkar: None. J. Toppari: None. W. Hagopian: Research Support; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. M. Rewers: None. H. Elding Larsson: None. Funding JDRF; National Institutes of Health

Exploring C-peptide loss in type 1 diabetes using growth curve analysis

ObjectivesC-peptide (CP) loss in type 1 diabetes (T1D) is highly variable, and factors influencing it are poorly understood. We modelled CP values in T1D patients from diagnosis for up to 6 years, treating the serial data as growth curves plotted against time since diagnosis. The aims were to summarise the pattern of CP loss (i.e. growth curve shape) in individual patients in simple terms, and to identify baseline characteristics that predict this pattern in individuals.Materials and methodsBetween 1976 and 2011, 442 T1D patients initially aged <18y underwent 120-minute mixed meal tolerance tests (MMTT) to calculate area under the curve (AUC) CP, at 3, 9, 18, 30, 48 and 72 months after diagnosis (n = 1537). The data were analysed using the novel SITAR mixed effects growth curve model (SuperImposition by Translation And Rotation). It fits a mean AUC growth curve, but also allows the curve’s mean level and rate of fall to vary between individuals so as to best fit the individual patient curves. These curve adjustments define individual curve shape.ResultsThe square root (√) AUC scale provided the best fit. The mean levels and rates of fall for individuals were normally distributed and uncorrelated with each other. Age at diagnosis and √AUC at 3 months strongly predicted the patient-specific mean levels, while younger age at diagnosis (p<0.0001) and the 120-minute CP value of the 3-month MMTT (p = 0.002) predicted the patient-specific rates of fall.ConclusionsSITAR growth curve analysis is a useful tool to assess CP loss in type 1 diabetes, explaining patient differences in terms of their mean level and rate of fall. A definition of rapid CP loss could be based on a quantile of the rate of fall distribution, allowing better understanding of factors determining CP loss and stratification of patients into targeted therapies.

Elevated T cell levels in peripheral blood predict poor clinical response following rituximab treatment in new-onset type 1 diabetes

Biologic treatment of type 1 diabetes (T1D) with agents including anti-CD3 (otelixizumab and teplizumab), anti-CD20 (rituximab), LFA3Ig (alafacept), and CTLA4Ig (abatacept) results in transient stabilization of insulin C-peptide, a surrogate for endogenous insulin secretion. With the goal of inducing more robust immune tolerance, we used systems biology approaches to elucidate mechanisms associated with C-peptide stabilization in clinical trial blood samples from new-onset T1D subjects treated with the B cell-depleting drug, rituximab. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis of whole-blood samples from this trial revealed a transient increase in heterogeneous T cell populations, which were associated with decreased pharmacodynamic activity of rituximab, increased proliferative responses to islet antigens, and more rapid C-peptide loss. Our findings illustrate complexity in hematopoietic remodeling that accompanies B cell depletion by rituximab, which impacts and predicts therapeutic efficacy in T1D. Our data also suggest that a combination of rituximab with therapy targeting CD4 + T cells may be beneficial for T1D subjects.

GAD vaccine reduces insulin loss in recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes: findings from a Bayesian meta-analysis.

GAD is a major target of the autoimmune response that occurs in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Randomised controlled clinical trials of a GAD + alum vaccine in human participants have so far given conflicting results. In this study, we sought to see whether a clearer answer to the question of whether GAD65 has an effect on C-peptide could be reached by combining individual-level data from the randomised controlled trials using Bayesian meta-analysis to estimate the probability of a positive biological effect (a reduction in C-peptide loss compared with placebo approximately 1year after the GAD vaccine). We estimate that there is a 98% probability that 20μg GAD with alum administered twice yields a positive biological effect. The effect is probably a 15-20% reduction in the loss of C-peptide at approximately 1year after treatment. This translates to an annual expected loss of between -0.250 and -0.235pmol/ml in treated patients compared with an expected 2h AUC loss of -0.294pmol/ml at 1year for untreated newly diagnosed patients. The biological effect of this vaccination should be developed further in order to reach clinically desirable reductions in insulin loss in patients recently diagnosed with type 1 diabetes.

A new approach for diagnosing type 1 diabetes in autoantibody-positive individuals based on prediction and natural history.

OBJECTIVEWe assessed whether type 1 diabetes (T1D) can be diagnosed earlier using a new approach based on prediction and natural history in autoantibody-positive individuals.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSDiabetes Prevention Trial–Type 1 (DPT-1) and TrialNet Natural History Study (TNNHS) participants were studied. A metabolic index, the T1D Diagnostic Index60 (Index60), was developed from 2-h oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) using the log fasting C-peptide, 60-min C-peptide, and 60-min glucose. OGTTs with Index60 ≥2.00 and 2-h glucose <200 mg/dL (Ind60+Only) were compared with Index60 <2.00 and 2-h glucose ≥200 mg/dL (2hglu+Only) OGTTs as criteria for T1D. Individuals were assessed for C-peptide loss from the first Ind60+Only OGTT to diagnosis.RESULTSAreas under receiver operating characteristic curves were significantly higher for Index60 than for the 2-h glucose (P < 0.001 for both DPT-1 and the TNNHS). As a diagnostic criterion, sensitivity was higher for Ind60+Only than for 2hglu+Only (0.44 vs. 0.15 in DPT-1; 0.26 vs. 0.17 in the TNNHS) OGTTs. Specificity was somewhat higher for 2hglu+Only OGTTs in DPT-1 (0.97 vs. 0.91) but equivalent in the TNNHS (0.98 for both). Positive and negative predictive values were higher for Ind60+Only OGTTs in both studies. Postchallenge C-peptide levels declined significantly at each OGTT time point from the first Ind60+Only OGTT to the time of standard diagnosis (range −22 to −34% in DPT-1 and −14 to −27% in the TNNHS). C-peptide and glucose patterns differed markedly between Ind60+Only and 2hglu+Only OGTTs.CONCLUSIONSAn approach based on prediction and natural history appears to have utility for diagnosing T1D.

Immune Intervention for Type 1 Diabetes, 2012–2013

Immune Intervention for Type 1 Diabetes, 2012–2013

Teplizumab Preserves C-Peptide in Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes

Protégé was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled 2-year study of three intravenous teplizumab dosing regimens, administered daily for 14 days at baseline and again after 26 weeks, in new-onset type 1 diabetes. We sought to determine efficacy and safety of teplizumab immunotherapy at 2 years and to identify characteristics associated with therapeutic response. Of 516 randomized patients, 513 were treated, and 462 completed 2 years of follow-up. Teplizumab (14-day full-dose) reduced the loss of C-peptide mean area under the curve (AUC), a prespecified secondary end point, at 2 years versus placebo. In analyses of prespecified and post hoc subsets at entry, U.S. residents, patients with C-peptide mean AUC >0.2 nmol/L, those randomized ≤6 weeks after diagnosis, HbA1c <7.5% (58 mmol/mol), insulin use <0.4 units/kg/day, and 8–17 years of age each had greater teplizumab-associated C-peptide preservation than their counterparts. Exogenous insulin needs tended to be reduced versus placebo. Antidrug antibodies developed in some patients, without apparent change in drug efficacy. No new safety or tolerability issues were observed during year 2. In summary, anti-CD3 therapy reduced C-peptide loss 2 years after diagnosis using a tolerable dose.

Continuous C-peptide loss in patients with type 1 diabetes and multiethnic background

C peptide (CP) was evaluated in 88 individuals with type 1 diabetes, variable disease duration and multiethnic background. Initially, 28 patients had detectable CP, which persisted in 46.2% after 17.4±4 months. CP decline was associated with ethnicity, HbA1c and baseline CP, but not with GADA, PTPN22 or insulin gene polymorphisms.