Burden Of Irritable Bowel Syndrome Research Articles

Exploring the burden of irritable bowel syndrome among university students in Saudi Arabia: A study on prevalence, psychological associations, and well-being.

Patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) experience not only a detrimental impact on their physical health but also a significant influence on their psychological well-being. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of IBS among university students, investigating the sociodemographic and lifestyle factors influencing its onset. Furthermore, it explored the potential impact of psychological factors such as depression, anxiety, and overall well-being on the prevalence of IBS. A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted at Saudi Arabian universities in November and December 2023. To collect data, an anonymous, validated, predesigned questionnaire was used. The diagnosis of IBS was carried out using the validated Arabic version of the Rome IV questionnaire. We used the Arabic version of the World Health Organization Well-being Index to assess the participants' well-being. We used the Arabic version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to identify people who show clinically significant symptoms of anxiety and depression. Our study included a total of 379 university students, 46.7% were female 86.0% of participants resided in urban areas, and 7.2% had been previously diagnosed with IBS. The prevalence of IBS among participants was found to be 31.9%. We observed a significant association between marital status and IBS (χ2 = 3.95, P = .047). Furthermore, the highest prevalence of IBS was observed among students majoring in literary and scientific disciplines (χ2 = 0.952, P = .049). Individuals with IBS demonstrate a significantly higher prevalence of anxiety (71.90% vs 41.09%, P < .001) and depression (64.46% vs 42.64%, P < .001) compared to those without IBS. Furthermore, people with IBS had a slightly higher prevalence of poor well-being (38.84%) compared to those without IBS (33.72%), but this association was not statistically significant. In multivariate analysis, having a family history of IBS [OR = 1.75 (95% CI, 1.06-2.87), P = .029] having borderline anxiety [OR = 7.58, 95% CI (2.12-27.06), P = .012] and anxiety [OR = 16.07, 95% CI (4.57-56.52), P < .001], and depression [OR = 2.97, 95% CI (1.13-7.83), P = .010] were the main significant predictors of IBS among university students. The high prevalence of IBS among university students was associated with a family history of IBS as well as depression and anxiety. Increasing awareness, multidisciplinary support, and access to mental health services is required to ensure university students' well-being.

Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Long-Term Risk of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Large-Scale Prospective Cohort Study

The considerable disease burden of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) has coincided with the increase of ultraprocessed food (UPF) consumption over the past few decades. However, epidemiologic evidence is lacking. We aimed to examine the long-term risk of IBS associated with UPF consumption in a large-scale prospective cohort. Participants who completed 24-hour dietary recalls during 2009 to 2012 from the UK Biobank, and free of IBS, celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease, and any cancer at baseline, were included (N= 178,711; 53.1% female). UPF consumption was defined according to the NOVA food classification system, expressed as a percentage of UPF content in the total diet intake (as grams per day). The primary outcome was incident IBS. A Cox proportional hazard model was performed to estimate associated risk. The mean UPF consumption was 21.0% (SD, 11.0%) of the total diet. During a median of 11.3 years of follow-up evaluation, 2690 incident IBS cases were identified. An 8% higher risk of IBS (hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04-1.12) was associated with each 10% increment of UPF consumption. Compared with the lowest quartile of UPF consumption, the highest quartile wasassociated with a significantly increased risk of incident IBS (hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.07-1.33; Ptrend < .001). Subgroup analyses by age, sex, body mass index, smoking, and alcohol drinking status also showed similar results, except for the never/previous drinking subgroup. Further sensitivity analyses confirmed the positive association with a higher UPF consumption. Our findings provide evidence that a higher UPF consumption is associated with an increased risk of incident IBS, with a significant dose-response relationship.

The Burden of Irritable Bowel Syndrome in Medical and Nurse Italian University Student Population: The VANVITELLI-IBS Survey.

The increased prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) among medical and nursing students is a global challenge. Unfortunately, data on the Italian medical and nurse student population are scarce. Therefore, this study was designed to assess the prevalence of IBS in this setting and to evaluate the demographic, university, Mediterranean diet adherence, and anxiety factors associated with its increased presence. To assess the prevalence of IBS, anxiety levels, and adherence to the Mediterranean diet in medical and nursing university students. An anonymous online questionnaire was sent to participants. Several demographic and educational variables were assayed, and the presence of symptoms associated with the definition of IBS (according to Rome IV criteria). In addition, anxiety levels and adherence to the Mediterranean diet were also assessed. Of 161 students, 21.11% met the Rome IV criteria for IBS. Some subgroups, the out-ofcourse students or no scholarship recipients, were found to have a higher percentage of IBS (p < 0.05). Being out-of-course was shown to be associated with an increased and unreported risk of presenting IBS (OR: 8.403, p < 0.001). Levels of anxiety and adherence to the Mediterranean diet were significantly worse in the IBS group (p < 0.01). Adherence to the Mediterranean diet was associated with a reduced risk of presenting IBS in our setting (OR 0.258, p = 0.002). Our sample of Italian medical and nursing students recorded a non-negligible percentage of IBS. Therefore, screening and awareness campaigns could be suggested.

The symptom burden of Irritable Bowel Syndrome in tertiary care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BackgroundThe COVID‐19 pandemic caused unprecedented disruption to healthcare services worldwide with well‐documented detrimental effects on mental health. Patients with refractory disorders of gut‐brain interaction such as Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) seen in tertiary care tend to exhibit higher levels of psychological comorbidity, but the impact of the pandemic on IBS symptom severity in tertiary care is unknown.MethodsAs part of routine clinical care, consecutive tertiary referrals with refractory IBS patients prospectively completed a series of baseline questionnaires including IBS symptom severity score (IBS‐SSS), non‐colonic symptom score, Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD), and Illness impact scores. The symptom severity questionnaire data were compared for consecutive patients seen in tertiary care 12 months before and after the onset of COVID‐19 pandemic restrictions.Key ResultsOf 190 consecutive tertiary referrals with IBS, those seen during the pandemic had greater IBS severity (IBS‐SSS: 352 vs. 318, p = 0.03), more severe extra‐intestinal symptoms (non‐colonic score: 269 vs. 225, p = 0.03), sleep difficulties (p = 0.03), helplessness and loss of control (p = 0.02), but similar HAD‐Anxiety (p = 0.96) and HAD‐Depression (p = 0.84) scores. During the pandemic, unmarried patients (p = 0.03), and keyworkers (p = 0.0038) had greater IBS severity.Conclusions and InferencesThis study has shown for the first time that patients seen in tertiary care with refractory IBS during the COVID‐19 pandemic had a significantly higher symptom burden emphasizing the importance of gut‐brain axis in IBS. Furthermore, lack of support and perceived loss of control appear to be contributory factors.

How are perceptions of social strain and low support related to Irritable Bowel Syndrome?-A Norwegian twin study.

BackgroundSocial stress is related to symptom burden of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). This study explores the associations between IBS and social strain or low support in close relationships, including spouse, friends, and family, in a Norwegian twin cohort.MethodsThe sample included 5442 Norwegian twins aged 40–80, of whom 589 suffer from IBS. We used multivariate structural equation models to estimate genetic and environmental sources of variation and covariation underlying IBS liability, measures of social stress and the relationships between these. The co‐twin control design was used to explore the nature of the associations between IBS and social strain or low support using models that test for causality.Key ResultsGenetic effects explained between 30% and 40% of the variation in IBS liability, social strain, and low support. The phenotypic correlations between IBS and social strain (0.20) and between IBS and low support (0.17) were primarily explained by shared genetic pathways. Surprisingly, all the genetic variation underlying the liability to develop IBS was shared with genetic influences underlying social strain and low support. In contrast, most of the nonshared environmental influences accounting for the variation of IBS risk were unique for IBS. The co‐twin control analyses suggest that the relationships between IBS and the social measures reflect shared familial rather than causal effects.Conclusion & InferencesThe genetic variation of IBS risk was fully shared with genetic effects for variation in the social measures, emphasizing the contribution of genes involved in central brain–gut mechanisms to genetic variation in IBS risk.

Global burden of irritable bowel syndrome: trends, predictions and risk factors.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is one of the most common disorders of gut-brain interaction worldwide, defined according to patterns of gastrointestinal symptoms as described by the Rome diagnostic criteria. However, these criteria, developed with reference to research conducted largely in Western populations, might be limited in their applicability to other countries and cultures. Epidemiological data show a wide variation in the prevalence of IBS globally and more rigorous studies are needed to accurately determine any differences that might exist between countries as well as the potential explanations. The effects of IBS on the individual, in terms of their quality of life, and on health-care delivery and society, in terms of economic costs, are considerable. Although the magnitude of these effects seems to be comparable between nations, their precise nature can vary based on the existence of societal and cultural differences. The pathophysiology of IBS is complex and incompletely understood; genetics, diet and the gut microbiome are all recognized risk factors, but the part they play might be influenced by geography and culture, and hence their relative importance might vary between countries. This Review aims to provide an overview of the burden of IBS in a global context, to discuss future implications for the care of people with IBS worldwide, and to identify key areas for further research.

Effects of a comprehensive self-management intervention on extraintestinal symptoms among patients with IBS

ObjectiveAdults with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) often report extraintestinal pain, fatigue, and sleep disturbances in addition to abdominal pain. Few interventions have sought to reduce these extraintestinal symptoms within the IBS population. To address this, we compared the effects of a comprehensive self-management (CSM) intervention to a control intervention (usual care) on extraintestinal pain, fatigue, and sleep disturbances among patients with IBS. MethodData were obtained from 243 IBS patients participating in two CSM intervention trials. Daily symptom diaries were collected at baseline, 3 and 6 months post-randomization. Daily symptoms of headache, backache, muscle pain, joint pain, fatigue, sleepiness during the day, sleep quality, and refreshed by sleep were analyzed. Analysis of covariance was used to determine the effects of the intervention on each symptom at 3 and 6 months controlling for ‘study’ and baseline symptom levels. ResultsPatients in the CSM intervention group reported decreased symptoms of fatigue, sleep disturbances, backache and headache compared to usual care at 3 and 6 months. The CSM group also reported significantly decreased joint pain at 3 months compared to usual care, but not 6 months. No significant difference was found for muscle pain. ConclusionsAn existing CSM intervention is effective in reducing fatigue and sleep disturbances. However, mixed results for extraintestinal pain indicates a need to better differentiate between underlying mechanisms. Addressing such symptoms is important to decrease the overall burden of IBS, reduce health care expenditures, and improve patients' quality of life.Trial Registration: NCT00907790; NCT00167635

The burden of irritable bowel syndrome and chronic constipation on health-related quality of life in black Africans: a comparison with healthy control subjects in Côte d'Ivoire, West Africa.

Background: Although patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and chronic constipation (CC) have an impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL), little is known in black African patients compared with control subjects. This study provided the magnitude and the influencing factors of HRQoL impairment in black African outpatients with IBS or CC compared with control subjects using the generic SF-36 questionnaire.Materials and methods: One hundred and four consecutive black African outpatients complaining with IBS (n=72, mean age=38.9 years, female=62.5%) and CC (n=32, mean age=37.4 years, female=75%) met Rome 3 criteria were compared with 210 control subjects (mean age=37.4 years, 63.8% male). The SF-36 scores in all domains of HRQoL with the corresponding physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) composite scores between groups were compared with post hoc analysis and multivariate linear regression analysis for the assessment of the influencing factors.Results: Overall, IBS and CC patients exhibited low SF-36 scores in the 8 domains of HRQoL in comparison with control subjects. IBS patients scored less in mental health (mean difference=−10.3, p=0.001), bodily pain (mean difference=−23.5, p≤0.0001), and social functioning domains (mean difference =−15.1, p=0.01) in comparison with CC patients. Post hoc analysis demonstrated a trend down of PCS (mean difference=−12.9, p<0.0001) and MCS (mean difference=−11.2, p=0.01) disfavoring IBS patients than those with CC in comparison with control subjects. In multivariate linear regression analysis, besides the negative impact of IBS and CC, factors influencing PCS were BMI (β=0.4; p=0.01) and comorbidities (β=−5.9; p=0.002). Those influencing MCS were the presence of remunerated activity (β=2.7, p=0.02), and patient living alone (β=9.4; p=0.04).Conclusion: IBS and CC impact negatively on the HRQoL in black African subjects and more importantly in those with IBS than CC.

A retrospective and prospective 12-month observational study of the socioeconomic burden of moderate to severe irritable bowel syndrome with constipation in Spain

IntroductionThe socioeconomic burden of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) has never been formally assessed in Spain. Patients and methodsThis 12-month (6-month retrospective and prospective periods) observational, multicentre study assessed the burden of moderate-to-severe IBS-C in Spain. Patients were included if they had been diagnosed with IBS-C (Rome III criteria) within the last 5 years and had moderate-to-severe IBS-C (IBS Symptom Severity Scale score [IBS-SSS] ≥175) at inclusion. The primary objective was to assess the direct cost to the Spanish healthcare system (HS). ResultsA total of 112 patients were included, 64 (57%) of which had severe IBS-C at inclusion. At baseline, 89 (80%) patients reported abdominal pain and distention. Patient quality of life (QoL), measured by the IBS-C QoL and EQ-5D instruments, was found to be impaired with a mean score of 59 and 57 (0–100, worst-best), respectively. Over the 6-month prospective period the mean IBS-C severity, measured using the IBS-SSS showed some improvement (315–234 [0–500, best–worst]). During the year, 89 (80%) patients used prescription drugs for IBS-C, with laxatives being the most frequently prescribed (n=70; 63%). The direct cost to the HS was €1067, and to the patient was €568 per year. The total direct cost for moderate-to-severe IBS-C was €1635. DiscussionThe majority of patients reported continuous IBS-C symptoms despite that 80% were taking medication to treat their IBS-C. Overall healthcare resource use and direct costs were asymmetric, with a small group of patients consuming the majority of resources.

Is there an appropriate strategy for treating co-morbid irritable bowel syndrome and bladder pain syndrome?

ABSTRACTIntroduction: Two of the most frequent components of chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) are irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and bladder pain syndrome (BPS), characterized by considerable overlapping symptoms and pathophysiology. Currently, its management is challenging meaning there is high the demand for novel efficient therapeutics to aid patient care and to tackle the socioeconomic burden of IBS and BPS. As there are presently no sufficient treatment strategies, identifying the mechanisms that result in their main symptoms is the opportunity for developing appropriate therapies.Areas covered: Herein, the authors explore the potential common treatment strategies for co-morbid IBS and BPS and highlight the absolute need for further research of these deliberating clinical entities.Expert opinion: In the future, the authors summise that the discovery of predictive molecular biomarkers combined with clinical phenotypic categorization will likely allow for more definitive differentiation of patients and thus for better treatment options. Furthermore, it has been suggested that effective IBS treatment strategies would be of great value to co-morbid IBS and BPS therapy.

OC.03.4: The Humanistic and Economic Burden of Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhoea Among Patients in Italy

OC.03.4: The Humanistic and Economic Burden of Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhoea Among Patients in Italy

Economic Burden of Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea: Retrospective Analysis of a U.S. Commercially Insured Population.

The economic burden associated with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) is not well understood. To (a) evaluate total annual all-cause, gastrointestinal (GI)-related, and symptom-related (i.e.,IBS, diarrhea, abdominal pain) health care resource use and costs among IBS-D patients in a U.S. commercially insured population and (b) estimate incremental all-cause health care costs of IBS-D patients versus matched controls. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with 12 months of continuous medical and pharmacy benefit eligibility in 2013 were identified from the Truven Health MarketScan research database. The study sample included patients with ≥ 1 medical claim with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis code in any position for IBS (ICD-9-CM 564.1x) and either (a) ≥ 2 claims for diarrhea (ICD-9-CM 787.91, 564.5x) on different service dates in 2013, or (b) ≥ 1 claim for diarrhea plus ≥ 1 claim for abdominal pain (ICD-9-CM 789.0x) on different service dates in 2013, or (c) ≥ 1 claim for diarrhea plus ≥ 1 pharmacy claim for a symptom-related prescription on different service dates in 2013. Controls included patients with no claims for IBS, diarrhea, abdominal pain, or symptom-related prescriptions in 2013. Controls were randomly selected and matched with IBS-D patients in a 1:1 ratio based on age (± 4 years), gender, geographic location, and health plan type. All-cause health care resource utilization included medical and pharmacy claims for health care services associated with any condition. Total health care costs were defined as the sum of health plan-paid and patient-paid direct health care costs from prescriptions and medical services, including inpatient, emergency department (ED), and physician office visits, and other outpatient services. A total cost approach was used to assess all-cause, GI-related, and symptom-related health care costs for IBS-D patients. An incremental cost approach via generalized linear models was used to assess the excess all-cause costs attributable to IBS-D after adjusting for demographics and general and GI comorbidities. Of 39,306 patients (n = 19,653 each for IBS-D and matched controls) included, mean (± SD) age was 47 (± 17) years and 76.5% were female. Compared with controls, IBS-D patients had a significantly higher mean annual number of hospitalizations, ED visits, office visits, and monthly (30-day) prescription fills. Mean annual all-cause health care costs for IBS-D patients were $13,038, with over half (58.4%) attributable to office visits and other outpatient services (e.g.,diagnostic tests and laboratory or radiology services), and remaining costs attributable to prescriptions (19.5%), inpatient admissions (13.6%), and ED visits (8.5%). GI-related ($3,817) and symptom-related ($1,693) costs were also primarily driven by other outpatient service costs. After adjusting for demographics and comorbidities, incremental annual all-cause costs associated with IBS-D were $2,268 ($9,436 for IBS-D patients vs. $7,169 for matched controls; P < 0.001) per patient/year, of which 78% were from medical costs and 22% were from prescription costs. IBS-D was associated with a substantial burden in direct costs in this population. Compared with matched controls, IBS-D patients had greater medical service use and incurred significantly more annual all-cause health care costs, even after controlling for demographics and comorbidities. Incremental costs associated with IBS-D were primarily attributable to increased use of medical services rather than pharmacy costs. This study was funded by Allergan. The authors received no compensation related to the development of the manuscript. Buono and Andrae are employees of Allergan. Mathur is an employee of Axtria. Averitt was an employee of Axtria at the time this study was conducted. Data from this manuscript have previously been presented in poster format by Buono at the American College of Gastroenterology Annual Scientific Meeting; Honolulu, Hawaii; October 16-21, 2015. Mathur and Averitt were involved in conducting the study analyses. All authors were involved in the study design, interpretation of the data, and preparation of the manuscript. The authors take full responsibility for the scope, direction, and content of the manuscript and have approved the submitted manuscript.

PGI31 - The Humanistic and Economic Burden of Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhoea (IBS-D) by Disease Severity among Patients in The EU5 Region

PGI31 - The Humanistic and Economic Burden of Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhoea (IBS-D) by Disease Severity among Patients in The EU5 Region

The impact of irritable bowel syndrome on daily functioning: Characterizing and understanding daily consequences of IBS.

Despite the well-documented economic and psychosocial burden of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), few studies have focused on the impact of IBS on daily activities. This study aims to quantitate impairment in daily activities among IBS patients and to evaluate the relationship between impairment, IBS, quality of life, and psychiatric symptoms. A total of 179 participants meeting ROME-III criteria for IBS completed an online research survey evaluating the following variables: (i) the impact of IBS on daily activities, (ii) comorbid psychiatric diagnoses, (iii) symptom severity, (iv) quality of life, and (v) symptom-specific cognitive affective factors related to IBS. This sample reported a high degree of impairment due to IBS, with 76% of the sample reporting some degree of IBS-related impairment in at least five different domains of daily life. Rates of impairment were significantly higher for participants who met criteria for anxiety, depression, and/or panic disorder. This study contributes to existing literature by demonstrating a high level of daily impairment among patients with IBS, particularly those who meet criteria for anxiety, depression, and panic disorder. These findings support the importance of integrated psychosocial and medical care for IBS patients, and highlight the utility of evaluation and intervention for behavioral avoidance/impairment especially among those who exhibit signs or symptoms of psychiatric diagnoses.

Economic burden of irritable bowel syndrome in China.

AIMTo estimate annual direct and indirect costs for patients diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and subtypes.METHODSPatients completed a standardized questionnaire concerning usage of healthcare resources, travel costs, meals, and productivity loss of patients when seeking treatment for IBS. Total annual costs per patient were calculated as the sum of direct (including medical and nonmedical) and indirect costs. Total annual costs per patient among various IBS subtypes were compared. Analysis of variance and bootstrapped independent sample t-tests were performed to determine differences between groups after controlling for IBS subtypes.RESULTSA total of 105 IBS patients (64.80% female), mean age of 57.12 years ± 10.31 years), mean disease duration of 4.31 years ± 5.40 years, were included. Total annual costs per patient were estimated as CNY18262.84 (USD2933.08). Inpatient and outpatient healthcare use were major cost drivers, accounting for 46.41%and 23.36% of total annual costs, respectively. Productivity loss accounted for 25.32% of total annual costs. The proportions of direct and indirect costs were similar to published studies in other countries. Nationally, the total costs of managing IBS would amount to CNY123.83 billion (USD1.99 billion). Among the IBS subtypes, total annual costs per patient of IBS-M was highest at CNY18891.18 (USD3034). Furthermore, there was significant difference in productivity loss among IBS subtypes (P = 0.031).CONCLUSIONIBS imposes a huge economic burden on patients and healthcare systems, which could account for 3.3% of the total healthcare budget for the entire Chinese nation. More than two-thirds of total annual costs of IBS consist of inpatient and outpatient healthcare use. Among the subtypes, IBS-M patients appear to have the greatest economic burden but require further confirmation.

Economic Burden of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) With Diarrhea (IBS-D): Retrospective Analyses of a US Commercially Insured Population

Economic Burden of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) With Diarrhea (IBS-D): Retrospective Analyses of a US Commercially Insured Population

Burden of irritable bowel syndrome in an increasingly cost-aware National Health Service

BackgroundThe National Health Service (NHS) is faced with increasing cost pressures that make the efficient use of resources paramount. Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) places a large burden on the NHS...

Psychosocial impact of irritable bowel syndrome: A brief review.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common disorder of the gastrointestinal tract with unclear etiology and no reliable biomarker. Like other chronic and functional disorders, medical treatments for IBS are suboptimal and the overall illness burden is high. Patients with IBS report high rates of psychopathology, low quality of life, and increased suicidal ideation. These patients also miss more days of work, are less productive at work, and use many healthcare resources. However, little is known about the burden of IBS on daily functioning. The primary aim of this paper is to review the current literature on the burden of IBS and to highlight the need for further research to evaluate the impact of IBS on daily activities. This research would contribute to our existing understanding of the impact of IBS on overall quality of life and well-being.

PWE-176 Prevalence, Management, And Healthcare Burden Of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (ibs) In Scotland

IntroductionUsing real-world healthcare, routinely collected information we investigated the prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and associated consumption of healthcare resources in the Scottish National Health Service.MethodsA consultation records database...

Economic burden of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation: a retrospective analysis of health care costs in a commercially insured population.

The prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) is estimated to be between 4.3% and 5.2% among adults in the United States. Little is known about the health care resource utilization and costs associated with IBS-C. To (a) evaluate the annual total all-cause, gastrointestinal (GI)-related, and IBS-C-related health care costs among IBS-C patients seeking medical care in a commercially insured population and (b) estimate the incremental all-cause health care costs among IBS-C patients relative to matched controls. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with continuous medical and pharmacy benefit eligibility in 2010 were identified from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database, which consists of administrative claims from 14 geographically dispersed U.S. health plans representing 45 million lives. IBS-C patients were defined as those with ≥ 1 medical claim with an ICD-9-CM diagnosis code in any position for IBS (ICD-9-CM 564.1x) and either ≥ 2 medical claims for constipation (ICD-9-CM 564.0x) on different service dates or ≥ 1 medical claim for constipation plus ≥ 1 pharmacy claim for a constipation-related prescription on different dates of service during the study period. Controls were defined as patients without any medical claims for IBS, constipation, abdominal pain, or bloating or pharmacy claims for constipation-related prescriptions. Controls were randomly selected and matched with IBS-C patients in a 1:1 ratio based on age (± 4 years), gender, health plan region, and health plan type. Patients with diagnoses or prescriptions suggesting mixed IBS, IBS with diarrhea, chronic diarrhea, or drug-induced constipation were excluded. Total health care costs in 2010 U.S. dollars were defined as the sum of health plan and patient paid costs for prescriptions and medical services, including inpatient visits, emergency room (ER) visits, physician office visits, and other outpatient services. The total cost approach was used to assess total all-cause or disease-specific health care costs for patients with IBS-C, while the incremental cost approach was used to examine the excess all-cause costs of IBS-C by comparing IBS-C patients with matched controls. Generalized linear models with bootstrapping were used to assess the incremental all-cause costs attributable solely to IBS-C after adjusting for demographics, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) score, and other general and GI-related comorbidities not included in the ECI score. A total of 7,652 patients (n = 3,826 each in the IBS-C and control cohorts) were included in the analysis. The mean (± SD) age was 48 (± 17) years, and 83.6% were female. The mean annual all-cause health care costs for IBS-C patients were $11,182, with over half (53.7%) of the costs attributable to outpatient services, including physician office visits and other outpatient services (13.1% and 40.6%, respectively). Remaining total all-cause costs were attributable to hospitalizations (21.8%), prescriptions (19.1%), and ER visits (5.4%). GI-related costs ($4,456) comprised 39.8% of total all-cause costs, while IBS-C-related costs ($1,335) accounted for 11.9% and were primarily driven by costs of other outpatient services (50.3%). After adjusting for demographics and comorbidities, the incremental annual all-cause health care costs associated with IBS-C were $3,856 ($8,621 for IBS-C patients vs. $4,765 for controls, P less than 0.01) per patient per year, of which 78.1% of the incremental costs were due to medical services, and 21.9% were due to prescription fills. IBS-C imposes a substantial economic burden in terms of direct health care costs in a commercially insured population. Compared with matched controls, IBS-C patients incurred significantly higher total annual all-cause health care costs even after controlling for general and GI-related comorbidities. Incremental all-cause costs associated with IBS-C were mainly driven by costs related to more frequent use of medical services as opposed to prescriptions.