Buprenorphine For Opioid Use Disorder Research Articles

Utilization of long-acting injectable monthly depot buprenorphine for opioid use disorder (OUD) in Kentucky, before and after COVID-19 related buprenorphine access policy changes

IntroductionLong-acting injectable buprenorphine (LAI-bup) formulations have advantages over transmucosal buprenorphine (TM-bup), but barriers may limit their utilization. Several policies shifted during the COVID-19 pandemic to promote buprenorphine access. The federal government expanded telemedicine treatment for opioid use disorder and Kentucky (KY) Medicaid lifted prior authorization requirements (PAs) for LAI-bup (i.e., Sublocade®). This retrospective cohort study evaluated changes in LAI-bup access, utilization, and retention before and after these policy changes in KY. MethodsIndividual-level TM-bup and LAI-bup dispensing record data from KY's prescription drug monitoring program examined LAI-bup utilization and retention, without a >30-day gap in coverage, for patients starting a new episode of LAI-bup treatment. Two key time periods were examined: pre-policy changes (Apr 1, 2019 – Dec 31, 2019) and post-policy changes (Apr 1, 2020 – Dec 31, 2020). Data on PA requests among Medicaid managed care organizations and availability of LAI-bup Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS)-certified pharmacies were also obtained. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model analysis compared pre- versus post-policy period treatment discontinuation. ResultsThe number of patients initiating LAI-bup increased from 211 to 481 over the two periods. By the end of the post-policy period, 24.3 % of eligible patients were retained on LAI-bup, versus 12.5 % in the pre-policy change period. The adjusted hazard ratio, comparing discontinuation during the post- versus pre-policy change periods, was 0.70 (95 % confidence interval: 0.55–0.89). There were also more REMS-certified pharmacies and providers in the post-policy change period. ConclusionsLAI-bup access, utilization, and retention increased after several policy changes.

Association of Receipt of Opioid Prescription for Acute Post-Delivery Pain Management with Buprenorphine Discontinuation among Postpartum People with Opioid Use Disorder

Buprenorphine is a safe and effective medication to treat opioid use disorder (OUD) in pregnant patients and is intended to be continued throughout pregnancy, delivery, and at least the one-year postpartum period. However, delivery often involves the need for acute pain management with opioid medications, such as after a cesarean section. For patients receiving buprenorphine, the provision of prescription opioids may negatively impact OUD treatment outcomes; however, not optimally managing acute pain may also impede OUD treatment benefit. Evidence is needed to disentangle the impacts of opioid prescription provision and methods of pain management in the immediate postpartum period on OUD treatment trajectories, ultimately to inform clinical guidelines tailored to the unique needs of pregnant and postpartum people receiving buprenorphine. Accordingly, this study took an initial step towards this goal to conduct a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort of pregnant patients taking buprenorphine for OUD at the time of delivery (n = 142) to determine whether receipt of an opioid prescription at birth hospitalization discharge was associated with the time of buprenorphine discontinuation within the 12 months following delivery. Among the sample, 26% (n = 37) were prescribed an opioid at the time of birth hospitalization discharge. The number of weeks post-delivery until buprenorphine discontinuation occurred was shorter amongst patients who were prescribed an opioid (median 11 weeks) compared to patients who were not prescribed an opioid (median 39 weeks; p < 0.001 by Mann–Whitney U test). However, a Cox regression model reported that receipt of an opioid prescription following delivery did not significantly increase the hazard ratio for buprenorphine discontinuation. In other words, OUD patients not prescribed an opioid at birth hospitalization discharge continued their buprenorphine for a longer median duration after delivery compared to their counterparts who received prescription opioids; yet, this finding did not reach statistical significance when taking into account additional clinical variables. The findings indicate how further research is warranted to inform evidence-based post-delivery pain practices for postpartum OUD treatment patients.

Protocol for harmonization of randomized trials testing the addition of behavioral therapy to buprenorphine for opioid use disorder

BackgroundAlthough buprenorphine is an effective treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD), much remains to be understood about treatment non-response and methods for improving treatment retention. The addition of behavioral therapies to buprenorphine has not yielded consistent benefits for opioid outcomes, on average. However, several studies suggest that certain subgroups may benefit from the combination of buprenorphine and behavioral therapy, highlighting the potential for personalized approaches to treatment. Furthermore, little is known about whether behavioral therapies improve buprenorphine retention or non-opioid (e.g., functional) outcomes. MethodsThe objective of this project is to harmonize four previously conducted clinical trials testing the addition of behavioral therapy to buprenorphine maintenance for OUD and to use this larger dataset to answer critical clinical questions about the role of behavioral therapy in this population. Study aims include identifying potential moderators of the effect of the addition of behavioral therapy and quantifying the effect of behavioral therapy on buprenorphine retention and functional outcomes. ResultsAnalyses will consider outcomes of weeks of opioid use, weeks of retention in buprenorphine treatment, and functional outcomes as measured by the Addiction Severity Index. Analyses will include an indicator for each study to account for heterogeneity of samples and design. ConclusionResults will help to inform clinical and research efforts to optimize the use of behavioral therapies in the treatment of OUD.

Practices and Outcomes Associated With Sublingual Buprenorphine Use in a Critically Ill Population.

Buprenorphine for opioid use disorder (OUD) is commonly used in the outpatient setting with increasing use in hospitalized patients. However, there is limited literature describing its use in critically ill populations. The primary objective was to report the practices of buprenorphine prescribing among ICU teams. We also assessed the effect of a novel initiation strategy on opioid requirements in the ICU and the incidence of precipitated withdrawal. Single-center, retrospective, descriptive study of patients receiving buprenorphine in the ICU. The main outcome was to describe the use of buprenorphine in ICU patients through indication, initiation strategy, dosing information, and time from ICU admission to the first dose. We also detailed the incidence of precipitated withdrawal overall and the difference in opioid requirements before and after a low-dose induction strategy (buprenorphine initiated while receiving full agonist opioids [5-d titration from 150 μg to 4 mg four times daily]). A total of 153 patients were included. Most patients (86.3%) received buprenorphine for treatment of OUD. Of the 75 patients taking buprenorphine before admission, 46 (61%) had it restarted within 24 hours of ICU admission. Among 95 patients requiring buprenorphine induction, 57 (60%) underwent standard induction and 38 (40%) underwent low-dose induction, with only one instance of precipitated withdrawal. Median morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) of concomitant full agonist opioids in patients completing low-dose induction decreased from 1057.5 mg to 262.5 mg in the 24 hours before initiation compared with the 24 hours after target buprenorphine dose was reached (p < 0.005). Use of sublingual buprenorphine was most often in patients with OUD. Timely continuation of home buprenorphine in the ICU was suboptimal. Both standard and low-dose induction strategies appear to be safe with a low risk of precipitating withdrawal. When implemented appropriately, low-dose buprenorphine induction may lead to significant reduction in full agonist opioids in critically ill patients.

Nine-year substance use treatment outcomes with buprenorphine for opioid use disorder in a federally qualified health center

BackgroundPrescribing medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) in primary care helps meet treatment demand, but few studies examine long-term treatment retention among medically-underserved primary care patients. MethodsThis 9-year retrospective study assessed overall retention at 6 months, and yearly up to 9 years, among 1451 patients with at least 6 months of buprenorphine prescription data from a federally-qualified health center (FQHC). We also examined whether patients who had gaps in treatment (>14 days without medication) later returned to care. Associations with treatment retention over total time in care were assessed. ResultsOn average, patients received buprenorphine treatment for 2.26 years. Among patients who experienced gaps in treatment but returned to care within 90 days, 64% were still receiving buprenorphine at six months (n=930 of 1451), and 70% (n =118 of 169) at 9 years, with an average yearly interval retention of 69% (range: 58–74%). Patients were on MOUD treatment and not in a gap about 81% of the time, and averaged 1.0 gap per patient per year (SD: 1.09; range 0–7.87). The mean gap length over the treatment period was 33.16 days. Older age, higher percentages of negative opioid tests, negative cocaine tests, and positive buprenorphine tests, and having diabetes were associated with longer treatment retention. ConclusionsOpioid use disorder (OUD) can be treated successfully in primary care FQHCs. Treatment gaps are common and reflect the chronic relapsing nature of OUD.

10-year retention of a comprehensive treatment model of buprenorphine for opioid use disorder

Background There has been extensive research demonstrating the effectiveness of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) but limited investigation into its long-term retention rate. Objective Assess the long-term treatment retention of a buprenorphine-based MOUD clinic with additional stratifications by age and gender. Methods This retrospective study analyzed 10-years of data from a MOUD clinic in West Virginia that served 3,255 unique patients during the study period (2009-2019). Retention was measured by summation of total treatment days with a new episode of care defined as re-initiating buprenorphine treatment after 60+ consecutive days of nonattendance. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, with the log-rank test, was used to compare retention by gender and age. Results The mean age was 38 (SD = 10.6) and 95% were non-Hispanic white. Irrespective of treatment episode, 56.8% of patients were retained ≥ 90 days, and the overall median time in treatment was 112 days. Considering only the first treatment episode, 48.4% of 3,255 patients were retained at least 90 days and the overall median was 77 days. Female patients had a ≥ 90 day retention rate of 52.2% for the first admission and 60.1% for multiple admissions, both significantly higher than those of male subjects (44.1% and 53.0%). Additionally, patients ≤ 24 years old had the lowest rate of treatment retention, while patients aged ≥ 35 had the highest. Conclusions This study adds to the limited data regarding long-term retention in MOUD. Our findings indicate gender and age were highly correlated with retention in MOUD treatment.

Implementation of an education session on buprenorphine induction in the emergency department, a resident-led initiative

IntroductionMany physicians including emergency medicine physicians report insufficient training and education on prescribing buprenorphine for opioid use disorder. As emergency departments implement buprenorphine induction protocols, educational sessions can provide physicians with further familiarity with the treatment of opioid use disorder. This quality improvement project aimed to address the barrier of physician education in the implementation of buprenorphine initiation in the emergency department and presents a model for resident-led education sessions of emergency medicine physicians.MethodsThe project was a resident-led educational quality improvement project on educating members of the Department of Emergency Medicine on buprenorphine induction. The thirty-minute educational session included a pre-test survey, lecture, practice case workshop, questions, post-test survey, and a discussion. The survey questions were designed for physicians including residents and faculty, but medical students were invited to complete the session.ResultsPhysicians including faculty and resident physicians responded positively to the educational survey, with an increase from 42.5 to 100% responding that they understood the risks and benefits of prescribing buprenorphine in the emergency department pre and post-survey respectively. Based on post-survey results, 88.5% of physicians responded that they planned to prescribe buprenorphine in the emergency department for patients meeting clinical criteria after completing the educational session.ConclusionThe results suggest that a resident-led training session can encourage peer involvement in buprenorphine induction to treat opioid use disorder in the emergency department.

ASAM recommends higher doses if needed for treatment with buprenorphine

In a clear but measured and scientific dispute against standard practice today, the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) has called for an end to the standardization of doses of buprenorphine for opioid use disorder (OUD). The recommendations, published in the Journal of Addiction Medicine, ASAM's flagship journal, note that doses should be optimal based on the individual needs of the patient. This was never in question within medical circles, including ASAM, but insurance policies and the tyranny of what is expected have led to suboptimal doses, both in the induction phase and the maintenance phase, of treatment.

Emergency Department Access to Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder

Although substantial evidence supports buprenorphine for treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) in controlled trials, prospective study of patient outcomes in clinical implementation of emergency department (ED) buprenorphine treatment is lacking. To examine the association between buprenorphine treatment in the ED and follow-up engagement in OUD treatment 1 month later. This multisite cohort study was conducted in 7 California EDs participating in a statewide implementation project to improve access to buprenorphine treatment. The study population included ED patients aged at least 18 years identified with OUD between April 1, 2021, and June 30, 2022. Data analysis was performed in October 2023. All participants were offered buprenorphine treatment for OUD (either in ED administration, prescription, or both), the uptake of which was examined as the exposure of interest. The primary outcome was engagement in OUD treatment 30 days after the ED visit, determined by patient report or clinical documentation. The association of ED buprenorphine treatment with subsequent OUD treatment engagement was estimated using hierarchical generalized linear models. This analysis included 464 ED patients with OUD. Their median age was 36.0 (IQR, 29.0-38.7) years, and most were men (343 [73.9%]). With regard to race and ethnicity, 64 patients (13.8%) self-identified as non-Hispanic Black, 183 (39.4%) as Hispanic, and 185 as non-Hispanic White (39.9%). Most patients (396 [85.3%]) had Medicaid insurance, and more than half (262 [57.8%]) had unstable housing. Self-reported fentanyl use (242 [52.2%]) and a comorbid mental health condition (328 [71.5%]) were common. Interest in buprenorphine treatment was high: 398 patients (85.8%) received buprenorphine treatment; 269 (58.0%) were administered buprenorphine in the ED and 339 (73.1%) were prescribed buprenorphine. With regard to OUD treatment engagement at 30 days after the ED visit, 198 participants (49.7%) who received ED buprenorphine treatment remained engaged compared with 15 participants (22.7%) who did not receive ED buprenorphine treatment. An association of ED buprenorphine treatment with subsequent OUD treatment engagement at 30 days was observed (adjusted risk ratio, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.27-3.07]). The findings of this cohort study suggest that among patients with OUD presenting to EDs implementing low-threshold access to medications for OUD, buprenorphine treatment was associated with a substantially higher likelihood of follow-up treatment engagement 1 month later. Future research should investigate techniques to optimize both the uptake and effectiveness of buprenorphine initiation in low-threshold settings such as the ED.

The Psychiatrist's Role in Treating Perinatal Opioid Use Disorder and Reducing Maternal Mortality.

Drug overdose is a leading cause of maternal mortality. Psychiatrists can play a critical role in reducing these deaths by delivering effective evidence-based treatments for perinatal opioid use disorder (POUD), including the use of buprenorphine. Medications for POUD (i.e., buprenorphine, methadone) are life-saving treatments, but only half of those who are diagnosed as having POUD will receive this treatment, which can result in an increased risk for return to opioid use, overdose, and death. Psychiatrists are well positioned to prescribe buprenorphine given the Drug Enforcement Administration's (DEA) removal of the requirement to submit a Notice of Intent to prescribe buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid use disorders. Psychiatrists who have a current DEA registration that includes Schedule III authority may now prescribe buprenorphine for opioid use disorders; the training requirements to do so are outlined herein. This article reviews the standard of care for screening, diagnosis, and treatment of POUD, and prescribing buprenorphine for POUD, as well as shared decision-making for medication selection, induction, and maintenance of buprenorphine during pregnancy, labor and delivery, and the postpartum year.

Association between Individual versus Community-level Social Vulnerability and Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome among Pregnant Individuals Receiving Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder.

Individual patient-level measures of adverse social determinants of health are associated with neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS), but the relative impact of community-level adverse social determinants of health remains to be defined. We examined the association between community-level social vulnerability and NOWS among pregnant individuals receiving buprenorphine for opioid use disorder. We conducted a secondary analysis of an established cohort of pregnant individuals and their infants participating in a multidisciplinary prenatal/addiction care program from 2013 to 2021. Addresses were geocoded using ArcGIS and linked at the census tract to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2018 Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), incorporating 15 census variables. The primary exposure was the SVI as a composite measure of community-level social vulnerability, and secondarily, individual scores for four thematic domains (socioeconomic status, household composition and disability, minority status and language, and housing type and transportation). The primary outcome was a clinical diagnosis of NOWS defined as withdrawal requiring pharmacological treatment following buprenorphine exposure. Among 703 pregnant individuals receiving buprenorphine, 39.8% (280/703) of infants were diagnosed with NOWS. Among our patinets, those who were nulliparous, had post-traumatic stress disorder, a term birth (≥ 37 weeks) and had a male infant were more likely to have an infant diagnosed with NOWS. Individuals with and without an infant diagnosed with NOWS had similarly high community-level social vulnerability per composite SVI scores (mean [standard deviation]: 0.6 [0.4-0.7] vs. 0.6 [0.4-0.7], p = 0.2]. In adjusted analyses, SVI, as a composite measure as well as the four domains, was not associated with NOWS diagnosis. Among pregnant persons receiving buprenorphine enrolled in a multidisciplinary prenatal and addition care program, while individual risk factors that measure adverse social determinants of health were associated with an NOWS diagnosis in the infant, community-level social vulnerability as measured by the SVI was not associated with the outcome. · Community-level SVI was not associated with neonatal opioid use disorder.. · Certain individual risk factors were identified as being associated with NOWS.. · Homogeneity of composite SVI scores may have led to lack of significant findings..

Characteristics, treatment patterns and retention with extended-release subcutaneous buprenorphine for opioid use disorder: A population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada

BackgroundUptake and retention for opioid agonist treatment (OAT) remains low. Novel extended-release formulations may improve OAT accessibility by reducing the frequency of healthcare visits. Our aim was to examine uptake, characteristics, treatment patterns and retention of individuals initiating extended-release subcutaneous buprenorphine (BUP-ER), a monthly injectable OAT. MethodsWe conducted a population-based cohort study among adults aged 18+ initiated on BUP-ER between February 3, 2020 and March 31, 2022 in Ontario, Canada. Using administrative health data, we defined continuous BUP-ER use based on repeat injections within a 56-day period and used Kaplan-Meier curves to estimate time on treatment. Among new BUP-ER recipients, we described individual and prescriber characteristics, healthcare utilization and treatment patterns. Results2366 individuals initiated BUP-ER. The median time to BUP-ER discontinuation was 183 days (interquartile range: 66–428 days) and 52.0% of individuals were co-prescribed buprenorphine/naloxone at least once throughout the period of BUP-ER receipt. Among individuals who initiated on a dose of 300mg BUP-ER and had three or more injections, 18.8% continued to receive only 300mg doses (N=276 of 1470). Furthermore, 28.6% of those whose dose was reduced to 100mg (N=341 of 1194) had a subsequent dose increase to 300mg. ConclusionsOn average, people initiating BUP-ER discontinue within the first 6 months of treatment. While BUP-ER is likely providing an important OAT option, the high occurrence of discontinuation, supplementation with buprenorphine/naloxone, and frequent dose increases suggest inadequacy of current dosing recommendations among a proportion of individuals.

Adoption of Emergency Department–Initiated Buprenorphine for Patients With Opioid Use Disorder

Emergency department (ED) initiation of buprenorphine is safe and effective but underutilized in practice. Understanding the factors affecting adoption of this practice could inform more effective interventions. To quantify the factors, including social contagion, associated with the adoption of the practice of ED initiation of buprenorphine for patients with opioid use disorder. This is a secondary analysis of the EMBED (Emergency Department-Initiated Buprenorphine For Opioid Use Disorder) trial, a multicentered, cluster randomized trial of a clinical decision support intervention targeting ED initiation of buprenorphine. The trial occurred from November 2019 to May 2021. The study was conducted at ED clusters across health care systems from the northeast, southeast, and western regions of the US and included attending physicians, resident physicians, and advanced practice practitioners. Data analysis was performed from August 2022 to June 2023. This analysis included both the intervention and nonintervention groups of the EMBED trial. Graph methods were used to construct the network of clinicians who shared in the care of patients for whom buprenorphine was initiated during the trial before initiating the practice themselves, termed exposure. Cox proportional hazard modeling with time-dependent covariates was performed to assess the association of the number of these exposures with self-adoption of the practice of ED initiation of buprenorphine while adjusting for clinician role, health care system, and intervention site status. A total of 1026 unique clinicians in 18 ED clusters across 5 health care systems were included. Analysis showed associations of the cumulative number of exposures to others initiating buprenorphine with the self-practice of buprenorphine initiation. This increased in a dose-dependent manner (1 exposure: hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.16-1.48; 5 exposures: HR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.66-4.89; 10 exposures: HR, 3.55; 95% CI, 1.47-8.58). Intervention site status was associated with practice adoption (HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.04-2.18). Health care system and clinician role were also associated with practice adoption. In this secondary analysis of a multicenter, cluster randomized trial of a clinical decision support tool for buprenorphine initiation, the number of exposures to ED initiation of buprenorphine and the trial intervention were associated with uptake of ED initiation of buprenorphine. Although systems-level approaches are necessary to increase the rate of buprenorphine initiation, individual clinicians may change practice of those around them. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03658642.

Buprenorphine/suboxone is safe in pregnancy: substance use and stigma in the healthcare professions

A clinical decision report using: Mullins N, Galvin SL, Ramage M, et al. Buprenorphine and Naloxone Versus Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder in Pregnancy: A Cohort Study. J Addict Med. 2020;14(3):185-192. https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000000562 for a woman with opioid use disorder during pregnancy.

411 Emergency Department and Hospital Utilization After Emergency Department-Initiated Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder

411 Emergency Department and Hospital Utilization After Emergency Department-Initiated Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder

Medications for opioid use disorder prescribed at hospital discharge associated with decreased opioid agonist dispensing in patients with opioid use disorder requiring critical care: A retrospective study

IntroductionBuprenorphine is highly effective for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD), and, in recent years, the rates of patients maintained on buprenorphine requiring critical care have been steadily increasing. Currently, no unified guidance exists for buprenorphine management during critical illness. Likewise, we do not know if patients maintained on buprenorphine for OUD are prescribed medications for OUD (MOUD) following hospital discharge or if buprenorphine management influences mu opioid agonist dispensing. MethodsIn our cohort of adults over the age of 18 with OUD, receiving buprenorphine formulations in the 3 months preceding their ICU admission, we sought to investigate the relationship between receipt of MOUD and non-MOUD opioid prescribing up to 12 months following hospital discharge. This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study approved by the MaineHealth institutional review board. The study analyzed differences in prescription rates between discharge and subsequent time points using chi square or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. We performed analyses using SPSS Statistical Software version 28 (IBM SPSS Inc., Armonk, NY) with significance set at p < 0.05. ResultsWe identified a statistically significant increase in MOUD prescribing 3 months posthospital discharge in patients who received MOUD at time of discharge (87.9 % vs 40 % p = 0.002.) The study found a significant increase in nonbuprenorphine opioid prescribing in patients who did not receive an MOUD prescription at time of discharge (24.2 % vs 70 % p = 0.007). This trend persisted at the 6-month and 12-month time points; however, it did not reach statistical significance. Additionally, the study identified a significant reduction in the incidence of non-MOUD opioid dispensing in patients prescribed MOUD at each time point measured (p = 0.007, p < 0.001. p < 0.001 and p = 0.008 at discharge, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively). ConclusionsThese findings support continuing buprenorphine dispensing following hospital discharge.

Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Removing Supervision Requirements for Nurse Practitioners Prescribing Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder

Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Removing Supervision Requirements for Nurse Practitioners Prescribing Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder

Patient reported preferences for sleep interventions among women receiving buprenorphine for opioid use disorder.

Among individuals receiving medication for OUD (MOUD), insomnia is highly prevalent and increases the risk for negative OUD outcomes. However, little is known about MOUD patient-reported preferences for insomnia treatments among women with OUD. This mixed-methods study explored acceptability of and patient preferences for sleep interventions among women in OUD treatment. This is an analysis from an ongoing cross-sectional survey and interview study investigating the relationship between sleep and OUD recovery. The parent study is actively enrolling non-pregnant women between 18-45 years stabilized on buprenorphine from an outpatient program. Participants complete measures including the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), with scores of ≥10 identifying clinically significant insomnia symptoms. A sub-sample who met this threshold completed semi-structured interviews. Descriptive statistics were generated for survey responses, and applied thematic analysis was used for interview data. Participants selected for the qualitative interview (n = 11) highlighted prior positive and negative experiences with sleep treatments, challenges with employing non-pharmacological sleep strategies, and preferences for both medical and behavioral sleep interventions while in recovery. Women emphasized the need for flexibility of sleep therapy sessions to align with ongoing social determinants (e.g., caregiving responsibilities) as well as for sleep medications without sedating effects nor risk of dependency. Many women receiving MOUD have concomitant insomnia symptoms, and desire availability of both pharmacologic and behavioral sleep interventions within the OUD treatment setting. Qualitative findings underscore the need for evidence-based sleep interventions that account for the unique socioenvironmental factors that may impact strategy implementation in this population.

The End of the X-waiver: Excitement, Apprehension, and Opportunity.

With the passage of the MAT act (Mainstreaming Addiction Treatment) and the MATE Act (Medication Training and Expansion), the Drug Enforcement Agency "X-waiver" program governing the office-based prescription of buprenorphine for opioid use disorder has been immediately eliminated. The move was championed by vocal organizations with a rightful concern about buprenorphine access but was opposed by most physicians. Nonetheless, buprenorphine can now be prescribed like any schedule 3 medication. Studies show that despite rising opioid overdoses, buprenorphine prescription increases have been slow to rise and are particularly absent in rural communities. The elimination of the X-waiver may theoretically improve buprenorphine prescribing rates for opioid use disorder in rural areas, by nurse practitioners and physician assistants, and by resident physicians in teaching programs. It may also help decrease discrimination against individuals with opioid use disorder in postacute-care settings like nursing homes, physical rehabilitation centers, and in prisons and jails. Concerns include the elimination of the only focused opioid use disorder education many physicians receive (X-waiver courses) and a literature base showing that interest, rather than the X-waiver itself, remains the biggest barrier to recruiting more buprenorphine prescribers. Concerns also exist over the harms of precipitated withdrawal when buprenorphine is initiated inappropriately. The change of the elimination of the X-waiver brings about a new opportunity for Family Medicine and its parent organizations to champion the inclusion of opioid use disorder treatment within the chronic disease care models well-known to our integrated care settings.

Telehealth Initiation of Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder: Patient Characteristics and Outcomes.

The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated access barriers for patients with opioid use disorder. Telehealth presents an opportunity to improve access, treatment quality, and patient outcomes. To determine patient characteristics associated with initiating buprenorphine treatment via telehealth and to examine how telehealth initiation is associated with access, treatment quality, and health outcomes. This cross-sectional study used deidentified insurance claims to identify opioid use disorder adult patients initiating buprenorphine treatment between March 1, 2020, and November 30, 2021. Multivariable logistic regression assessed determinants of telehealth initiation. Propensity score matching addressed observed differences between in-person and telehealth initiators. Treatment quality outcomes included initiation within 14 days of diagnosis, engagement (at least 2 opioid use disorder-related visits), and any buprenorphine refill during the study period. Health outcomes included opioid overdose and opioid use disorder-related emergency department and inpatient visits. We identified 23,565 adult buprenorphine initiators, including 3314 (14.1%) patients using telehealth. Younger patients (OR 0.91 to 0.77), females (OR 1.18), South (OR 1.63) and Midwest (OR 1.27) regions, rural area (OR 1.12), and higher-income (OR 1.16) neighborhood residents were more likely to use telehealth. Telehealth patients were more likely than in-person patients (54.5% vs. 48.4%; adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 1.29; 95% CI, 1.19-1.40) to stay engaged with opioid use disorder treatment, and more likely to refill buprenorphine during the study period (83.6% vs. 79.0%, AOR 1.37; 95% CI, 1.23-1.52). Telehealth initiation of buprenorphine was associated with 36% lower overdose rate than in-person initiation (adjusted incidence rate ratio 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45-0.94). The two groups evidenced no significant differences in opioid use disorder-related ED visit and hospitalization. Our findings suggest that telehealth-initiated buprenorphine treatment is associated with reduced opioid overdose rate and improved patient engagement. Our findings strengthen the case for extending telehealth exemptions and prescribing flexibilities for treatment.