The aim of this study is to propose a comparison between wind and seismic loads on a multi-story reinforced concrete (RC) building. The investigation focuses on lateral displacements and story drifts of a 6-story RC structure, which are determined manually using the base shear method and with the aid of the ETABS software tool. The study considers a linearity of the structure and uses the Chinese building design code for lateral displacement analysis. The base shear method is a simplified method that only considers one degree of freedom for each story, neglecting the non-linearity of the structures. However, the Chinese building code permits its use when considering the consistent vertical distribution of the building's mass and stiffness, which leads to shear deformation prevailing during seismic and wind reactions. The lateral displacements under wind and seismic loads are estimated, and the story drift limitation criteria of the Chinese building design code are assessed. Both the base shear method and ETABS's story drift computation (story drift 1/550) meet the design code criteria. This indicates that the base shear technique approach of RC frame structures can reasonably predict the tale drift on each story, despite relying heavily on simplifications. To compare the outcomes from the ETABS program to the internal forces under seismic and wind load activities, the story displacements and drifts are computed. The results show little discrepancy between the base shear method and ETABS software. Hence, the base shear approach can be utilized when there is no irregularity, and the building height is less than 40 m. Overall, the findings of this study indicate that the base shear method can provide a good approximation for the lateral displacements and story drifts of multi-story RC constructions under wind and seismic loads, provided that the Chinese building code criteria are met. The study highlights the importance of using appropriate design codes and tools in ensuring the safety and reliability of structures. Further research can explore the applicability of similar simplified methods in more complex and irregular structures, and the development of more accurate and efficient design tools.