Buffering Of Conditioned Fear Responses Research Articles

Naloxone increases conditioned fear responses during social buffering in male rats.

Social buffering is the phenomenon in which the presence of an affiliative conspecific mitigates stress responses. We previously demonstrated that social buffering completely ameliorates conditioned fear responses in rats. However, the neuromodulators involved in social buffering are poorly understood. Given that opioids, dopamine, oxytocin and vasopressin play an important role in affiliative behaviour, here, we assessed the effects of the most well-known antagonists, naloxone (opioid receptor antagonist), haloperidol (dopamine D2 receptor antagonist), atosiban (oxytocin receptor antagonist) and SR49059 (vasopressin V1a receptor antagonist), on social buffering. In Experiment 1, fear-conditioned male subjects were intraperitoneally administered one of the four antagonists 25 min prior to exposure to a conditioned stimulus with an unfamiliar non-conditioned rat. Naloxone, but not the other three antagonists, increased freezing and decreased walking and investigation as compared with saline administration. In Experiment 2, identical naloxone administration did not affect locomotor activity, anxiety-like behaviour or freezing in an open-field test. In Experiment 3, after confirming that the same naloxone administration again increased conditioned fear responses, as done in Experiment 1, we measured Fos expression in 16 brain regions. Compared with saline, naloxone increased Fos expression in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus and decreased Fos expression in the nucleus accumbens shell, anterior cingulate cortex and insular cortex and tended to decrease Fos expression in the nucleus accumbens core. Based on these results, we suggest that naloxone blocks social buffering of conditioned fear responses in male rats.

The lateral intercalated cell mass of the amygdala is activated during social buffering of conditioned fear responses in male rats

The presence of an affiliative conspecific reduces stress responses to a wide variety of stimuli. This phenomenon is termed “social buffering”. We previously found that the presence of another Wistar rat (associate) suppressed activation of the lateral amygdala (LA) and ameliorated stress responses to an auditory conditioned stimulus (CS) in a fear-conditioned Wistar subject rat. Subsequent analyses suggested that activation of the posterior complex of the anterior olfactory nucleus (AOP) is responsible for the suppression of the LA. However, it remains unclear how the AOP suppresses the LA. To clarify this issue, a fear-conditioned Wistar subject was exposed to the CS either alone or with a Wistar associate. We also prepared a fear-conditioned Wistar subject that was tested with a Fischer344 (F344) associate as an additional control because F344 associates do not induce social buffering. We found that the presence of a Wistar associate induced a reduction of behavioral responses and Fos expression in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN) of the subject. Although Fos expression in the AOP was increased, the expression was not biased towards the GABAergic cells. In addition, Fos expression in the lateral intercalated cell mass of the amygdala (lITC) was increased. In contrast, the presence of a F344 associate did not affect Fos expression in subjects’ PVN or lITC, whereas behavioral responses were slightly reduced. These results suggest that the lITC was activated during social buffering. Based on these findings, we propose that the AOP indirectly suppresses the LA by activating the lITC.

A dyad shows mutual changes during social buffering of conditioned fear responses in male rats

The presence of an affiliative conspecific reduces stress responses to a wide variety of stimuli. This phenomenon is termed “social buffering”. We previously found that the presence of another naïve rat (associate) reduced conditioned fear responses to an auditory conditioned stimulus in a conditioned subject rat. Although we subsequently conducted a series of studies to examine behavioral, physiological, and neural changes during social buffering in the conditioned subject, the changes in the associate remained unclear. Therefore, in the present study, we investigated the behavioral and neural changes in the associate. Fear-conditioned and non-conditioned rats were re-exposed to the conditioned stimulus with an associate placed in the same enclosure (Experiment 1) or separated by a wire-mesh partition (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, the associate exhibited increased anogenital contact and allo-grooming, which were accompanied by increased c-Fos expression in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus and central amygdala. These results suggest that the subject and associate mutually affected each other during social buffering. In contrast, in Experiment 2, we found only a difference in the time course of investigation between associates tested with the conditioned and non-conditioned subjects. These results suggest that the associate was unable to acquire a sufficient amount of signal from the conditioned subject behind the wire-mesh partition necessary to show clear changes in behavior and c-Fos expression. Taken together, the current findings suggest that a dyad shows mutual changes during social buffering of conditioned fear responses in male rats.

Social buffering ameliorates conditioned fear responses in the presence of an auditory conditioned stimulus

Social buffering is a phenomenon in which stress in an animal is ameliorated when the subject is accompanied by a conspecific animal(s) during exposure to distressing stimuli. Previous studies of social buffering of conditioned fear responses in rats have typically used a 3-s auditory conditioned stimulus (CS) as a stressor, observing stress responses during a specified experimental period. Because a 3-s CS is extremely short compared with a typical experimental period, freezing has thus been observed primarily in the absence of the CS. Therefore, it has been unclear whether social buffering ameliorates conditioned fear responses in the presence of the CS. To clarify this issue, the current study assessed the effects of social buffering on conditioned fear responses in the presence of a 20-s CS. We measured the percentage of time spent freezing during the 20-s period following the onset of the CS. When conditioned subjects were exposed to the 20-s CS alone, they exhibited a high percentage of freezing in the presence of the CS. The presence of another non-conditioned rat completely blocked this response. The same result was observed when freezing was observed primarily in the absence of the 3-s CS. In addition, we confirmed that the presence of an associate ameliorated conditioned fear responses induced by a 20-s CS or 3-s CS when the duration and frequency of fear responses was measured. These findings indicate that social buffering ameliorates conditioned fear responses in the presence of an auditory CS.

The strain of an accompanying conspecific affects the efficacy of social buffering in male rats

Social buffering is a phenomenon in which stress in an animal is ameliorated when the subject is accompanied by a conspecific animal(s) during exposure to distressing stimuli. We previously reported that in male Wistar rats, the presence of another Wistar rat mitigates conditioned fear responses to an auditory conditioned stimulus (CS). Subsequent analyses revealed several characteristics of this social buffering of conditioned fear responses. However, information regarding the specificity of accompanying conspecifics is still limited. In the present study, we assessed whether rats of other strains could induce social buffering in Wistar rats. When a fear-conditioned Wistar subject was re-exposed to the CS alone, we observed increased freezing and decreased investigation and walking, as well as elevated corticosterone levels. The presence of a Wistar, Sprague–Dawley, or Long–Evans rat blocked these responses, suggesting that social buffering was induced by these strains of rats. In contrast, a Fischer 344 rat did not induce social buffering in the Wistar subject. We further found that an inbred Lewis rat induced social buffering whereas a Brown Norway rat, a strain that has been established independently from Wistar rats, did not. These results suggest that the difference in origin, rather than the inbred or outbred status of the associate rat, seemed to account for the lack of social buffering induced by the F344 rats. Based on these findings, we conclude that strains of an accompanying conspecific can affect the efficacy of social buffering in rats.

Social buffering ameliorates conditioned fear responses in female rats

The stress experienced by an animal is ameliorated when the animal is exposed to distressing stimuli along with a conspecific animal(s). This is known as social buffering. Previously, we found that the presence of an unfamiliar male rat induced social buffering and ameliorated conditioned fear responses of a male rat subjected to an auditory conditioned stimulus (CS). However, because our knowledge of social buffering is highly biased towards findings in male subjects, analyses using female subjects are crucial for comprehensively understanding the social buffering phenomenon. In the present studies, we assessed social buffering of conditioned fear responses in female rats. We found that the estrus cycle did not affect the intensity of the rats' fear responses to the CS or their degree of vigilance due to the presence of a conspecific animal. Based on these findings, we then assessed whether social buffering ameliorated conditioned fear responses in female rats without taking into account their estrus cycles. When fear conditioned female rats were exposed to the CS without the presence of a conspecific, they exhibited behavioral responses, including freezing, and elevated corticosterone levels. By contrast, the presence of an unfamiliar female rat suppressed these responses. Based on these findings, we conclude that social buffering can ameliorate conditioned fear responses in female rats.

A familiar conspecific is more effective than an unfamiliar conspecific for social buffering of conditioned fear responses in male rats

In social animals, the presence of an affiliative conspecific alleviates acute stress responses, and this is called social buffering. We previously reported in male rats that the presence of a conspecific mitigates conditioned fear responses to auditory conditioned stimulus paired with foot shocks. Subsequent studies revealed that we could observe this social buffering when rats were tested in a box odorized by a conspecific. Because we previously used an unfamiliar conspecific, the effects of familiarity with a conspecific on the intensity of social buffering remain unclear. Here, we examine this question by preparing a familiar conspecific that had been housed with a subject for 3 weeks in the same cage. We exposed fear-conditioned subjects to a conditioned stimulus in either a clean control box or a box odorized beforehand by either an unfamiliar or a familiar conspecific. When the subjects were tested in the control box, they showed freezing and Fos expression in the paraventricular nucleus. These responses were suppressed when we placed rats in the box odorized by a conspecific. However, the suppression was greater when the box was odorized by a familiar conspecific rather than by an unfamiliar conspecific. Fos expression in the lateral amygdala was also suppressed in the same manner. These results suggest that a familiar conspecific is more effective for social buffering of conditioned fear responses.

Social buffering reduces male rats' behavioral and corticosterone responses to a conditioned stimulus

In social species, the presence of an affiliative same-sex conspecific ameliorates acute stress responses in threatening conditions. We previously found that the presence of an unfamiliar male rat separated by a wire mesh barrier blocks the behavioral responses and Fos expression in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN) in a male subject rat that had previously been exposed to an auditory conditioned stimulus (CS) paired with foot shocks. Based on the Fos expression in the PVN, we hypothesized that the presence of a conspecific ameliorated the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis activation and induced social buffering of conditioned fear responses. The direct evidence for this hypothesis, however, is still lacking. To clarify this point, we exposed fear-conditioned and non-conditioned subjects to the CS either alone or with a conspecific separated by a wire mesh barrier. When the fear-conditioned subject alone was re-exposed to the CS, it exhibited increased freezing, decreased sniffing, and elevated corticosterone levels. In contrast, the presence of the conspecific suppressed these behavioral and HPA axis responses to a level similar to those observed in the non-conditioned subjects. These results suggest that the presence of a conspecific suppressed the behavioral responses and HPA axis activation to the CS. The present results provide direct evidence for the existence of social buffering of conditioned fear responses in male rats.

Olfactory signals mediate social buffering of conditioned fear responses in male rats

In social animals, the presence of an affiliative conspecific alleviates acute stress responses, and this is called social buffering. We previously reported that social buffering mitigates the fear responses of male rats to auditory conditioned stimuli that had been paired with foot shocks. Subsequent studies revealed that signals that are perceived by the main olfactory epithelium are important for social buffering. Because olfactory signals are the signal perceived by the main olfactory epithelium, we hypothesized that we could induce the social buffering of conditioned fear responses by presenting olfactory signals that were derived from a conspecific. In order to test this hypothesis, we exposed fear-conditioned subjects to a conditioned stimulus either in a clean test box or in a test box that was odorized by keeping a conspecific in it as an odor donor beforehand. When the subjects were tested in the clean test box, they showed behavioral fear responses and enhanced Fos expression in the paraventricular nucleus. In contrast, the presence of conspecific olfactory signals blocked these fear responses and Fos expression. These results suggested that olfactory signals suppress conditioned fear responses. Fos expression in the posteromedial region of the olfactory peduncle and amygdala suggested that this suppression involves the same neural mechanisms as those of social buffering. Taken together, we concluded that olfactory signals mediate the social buffering of conditioned fear responses.

The neural pathway underlying social buffering of conditioned fear responses in male rats

In social animals, the presence of an affiliative conspecific alleviates acute stress responses, and this is termed social buffering. However, the neural mechanisms underlying social buffering have not been elucidated. We have reported that the main olfactory system mediates social buffering of conditioned fear responses in male rats, and this is accompanied by suppression of the lateral and central amygdala. Therefore, olfactory signals are probably transmitted from the main olfactory system to the amygdala. Because the lateral and central amygdala do not receive projections from the main olfactory bulb, the site that links the main olfactory bulb and amygdala was presumed to be located within the main olfactory system. To find the linkage site, we generated lesions within the main olfactory system, and found that a bilateral lesion in the posteromedial region of the olfactory peduncle (pmOP) blocked social buffering. Next, we determined that the pmOP receives direct projections from the main olfactory bulb. Finally, we demonstrated that the connection between the pmOP and ipsilateral amygdala is important for social buffering, and that the pmOP projects directly to the ipsilateral amygdala, including the lateral and central amygdala. On the basis of these results, we suggest that the pmOP links the main olfactory blub to the amygdala and enables social buffering of conditioned fear responses. These results provide the first comprehensive picture of the neural pathway underlying the social buffering phenomenon.

Anterior olfactory nucleus plays an important role in the social buffering of conditioned fear responses in male rats

Anterior olfactory nucleus plays an important role in the social buffering of conditioned fear responses in male rats

Main olfactory system mediates social buffering of conditioned fear responses in male rats

We previously reported that the presence of a conspecific animal blocked freezing of a male rat in response to an auditory conditioned stimulus that had been paired with foot shocks, as well as associated Fos expression in the paraventricular nucleus. Here we investigated how this 'social buffering' is mediated by examining the contributions of both physical contact and the main olfactory system. Fear-conditioned rats exposed to the conditioned stimulus alone responded by freezing and increased Fos expression in the paraventricular nucleus. However, the presence of another rat, but not a guinea pig, dramatically mitigated these responses, even if the dyad was separated by a wire mesh or a pair of wire meshes 5 cm apart. In contrast, social buffering was absent when a transparent acrylic board was inserted between the double wire mesh. Lesioning of the main olfactory epithelium by injection of ZnSO(4) intranasally also abolished social buffering. Thus, we conclude that the main olfactory system is essential for the social buffering but does not require physical contact between the dyad.

Main olfactory system is essential for the social buffering of conditioned fear responses in male rats

Main olfactory system is essential for the social buffering of conditioned fear responses in male rats

Face pictures reduce behavioural, autonomic, endocrine and neural indices of stress and fear in sheep.

Faces are highly emotive stimuli and we find smiling or familiar faces both attractive and comforting, even as young babies. Do other species with sophisticated face recognition skills, such as sheep, also respond to the emotional significance of familiar faces? We report that when sheep experience social isolation, the sight of familiar sheep face pictures compared with those of goats or inverted triangles significantly reduces behavioural (activity and protest vocalizations), autonomic (heart rate) and endocrine (cortisol and adrenaline) indices of stress. They also increase mRNA expression of activity-dependent genes (c-fos and zif/268) in brain regions specialized for processing faces (temporal and medial frontal cortices and basolateral amygdala) and for emotional control (orbitofrontal and cingulate cortex), and reduce their expression in regions associated with stress responses (hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus) and fear (central and lateral amygdala). Effects on face recognition, emotional control and fear centres are restricted to the right brain hemisphere. Results provide evidence that face pictures may be useful for relieving stress caused by unavoidable social isolation in sheep, and possibly other animal species, including humans. The finding that sheep, like humans, appear to have a right brain hemisphere involvement in the control of negative emotional experiences also suggests that functional lateralization of brain emotion systems may be a general feature in mammals.