Bud Cold Hardiness Research Articles

Cold hardiness-informed budbreak reveals role of freezing temperatures and daily fluctuation in a chill accumulation model.

Fundamental questions in bud dormancy remain, including what temperatures fulfill dormancy requirements (i.e. chill accumulation). Recent studies demonstrate freezing temperatures promote chill accumulation and cold hardiness influences time to budbreak-the phenotype used for dormancy evaluations. Here we evaluated bud cold hardiness and budbreak responses of grapevines (Vitis hybrids) throughout chill accumulation under three treatments: constant (5 °C), fluctuating (-3.5 to 6.5 °C daily), and field conditions (Madison, WI, USA). Chill treatments experiencing lower temperatures promoted greater gains in cold hardiness (field>fluctuating>constant). All treatments decreased observed time to budbreak with increased chill accumulation. However, perceived treatment effectiveness changed when time to budbreak was adjusted to remove cold acclimation effects. Among three classic chill models (North Carolina, Utah, and Dynamic), none was able to correctly describe adjusted time to budbreak responses to chill accumulation. Thus, a new model is proposed that expands the range of chill accumulation temperatures to include freezing temperatures and enhances chill accumulation under fluctuating temperature conditions. Most importantly, our analysis demonstrates that adjustments for uneven acclimation change the perceived effectiveness of chill treatments. Therefore, future work in bud dormancy would benefit from simultaneously evaluating cold hardiness.

Cold Hardiness in ‘Alphonse Lavallee’ (Vitis vinifera L. cv) Grape Dormant Buds and Phloem Tissue: Seasonal Insights and Some Treatment Impacts

Grapes are highly susceptible to cold damage during critical developmental stages, impacting viticulture. Understanding the intricate dynamics of cold hardiness in grape dormant buds and phloem tissue is crucial for developing effective mitigation strategies. In this study, we investigated the LT50 values, representing the temperature at which 50% of buds are damaged, under different treatments and sampling times. In our research, we evaluated the effects of four treatments—potassium oxide (K2O), calcium chloride (CaCl2), seaweed (SW), and a control—on the cold hardiness of grapevine buds and phloem tissue. Primary bud LT50 values varied across seasons, with January at −22.46 °C, February at −22.35 °C, and March at −20.45 °C. K2O treatment showed a trend toward improvement, although the difference from the control (−21.99 °C) was not statistically significant. Regarding LT50 values, CaCl2 and SW applications did not significantly differ from the control. Tertiary buds, however, exhibited a substantial enhancement in cold hardiness with K2O application, displaying significantly lower LT50 values compared to the control (−23.55 °C). Phloem tissue LT50 values did not significantly differ among treatments, showing less variability. Bud water content significantly increased with K2O application in all sampling periods (January: 35.41% vs. 35.61%; February: 34.03% vs. 39.16%; March: 42.40% vs. 37.82%), while shoot water content remained stable. In conclusion, K2O emerges as a key influencer, particularly in enhancing the cold hardiness of tertiary buds. These insights contribute to the knowledge base for targeted frost mitigation strategies in viticulture.

Factors that influence measurements of sweet cherry (Prunus avium) flower bud cold hardiness obtained using differential thermal analysis

Differential thermal analysis (DTA) is a technique commonly used to evaluate the cold hardiness of plant organs that supercool as a means for cold survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different pretest bud storage conditions, cooling rates, and bud excision techniques on dormant sweet cherry flower bud low temperature exotherms (LTEs) measured using DTA. Furthermore, this study compared cold hardiness estimates made using DTA and controlled freezing tests. We determined that buds stored at warmer temperatures (12.5 °C and room temperature) for 2–6 h prior to DTA or transported to the lab in a moist environment underwent biologically relevant changes in their apparent sensitivity to cold, as indicated by LTEs produced at warmer temperatures. The DTA cooling rate also significantly affected LTEs, with faster cooling resulting in the production of LTEs at warmer temperatures. Overall, LTEs were comparable among buds with varying amounts of plant material remaining attached to the bud base. It is important to note that the region directly subtending the primordia was always left intact on the buds being compared. This study demonstrated that overall, DTA and controlled freezing tests resulted in comparable measures of cold hardiness. The findings presented in this study are pertinent to researchers interested in conducting cold hardiness measurements in sweet cherry and highlight that consistency in DTA pretest conditions and bud preparation are required to achieve reliable LTE results that can be compared among studies.

Optimized differential thermal analysis sheds light on the effect of temperature on peach floral bud cold hardiness and transition from endo- to ecodormancy

The greatest threat to profitable peach production is cold damage to reproductive tissues. To better understand and mitigate cold damage in peach accurate and efficient assessment of floral bud cold hardiness (Hc) is critical. Differential thermal analysis (DTA) was optimized for efficient and precise detection of low-temperature exotherms (LTE) created by the freezing of supercooled intracellular water in peach floral primordia to determine Hc weekly during the dormant season. DTA-estimated lethal temperatures (LT) were validated against the standard oxidative browning method (OB) and in situ field damage following three freezing events. Chilling (0–7.2 °C) accumulation tracked throughout the dormant season to determine DTA-related changes across dormancy phase transitions. LTEs showed rapid acclimation of ‘Redhaven’ peach floral buds following the first frost of the dormant season (Tmin=−6.8 °C on November 18, 2016) and maintained similar Hc levels for 45 days through maximum Hc (LT50 =−23.9 °C recorded on January 9, 2017) and until the accumulation of 868 chilling hours was reached. Following this milestone, a significant 55% loss of LTEs upon the accumulation of the first growing degree day (Tbase=7 °C) was recoded on February 7, 2017. An LTE recovery approach, pre-exposing buds to a non-freezing low temperature (−2°C) for a period of 12 h, more than doubled the number of LTEs detected for another 27 days extending DTA use for LT prediction. The results presented herein confirm that the use of DTA is efficient and accurate to determine Hc in peach floral buds, and suggest that the LTE loss in early spring may be a signature response related to the shift from endo- into ecodormancy following two environmental temperature cues, chilling satisfaction and the first heat accumulation post chilling satisfaction.

Exploration of environmental variables for peach floral bud cold hardiness prediction in western Colorado

Exploration of environmental variables for peach floral bud cold hardiness prediction in western Colorado

Seasonal variations of cold hardiness and dormancy depth in five temperate woody plants in China

Woody plant species in temperate regions must withstand a cold winter and freezing events through cold acclimation and dormancy in autumn and winter. However, how seasonal changes in dormancy depth and cold hardiness affect the frost risk of temperate species is unclear because few studies have assessed dormancy depth and cold hardiness simultaneously. In this study, an experiment was conducted to estimate the dormancy depth and cold hardiness of five common woody temperate plant species during the winter of 2018/2019 in Beijing, China. Twigs of each species were collected at different dates during winter and the timing of budburst was monitored under the same forcing conditions. The dormancy depth was quantified as growing degree day (GDD) requirements of spring events. Simultaneously, the cold hardiness of buds at each sampling date was determined based on the electrical conductivity of the holding solution. Two indices (chilling accumulation and cold hardiness index) were used to simulate the past dynamics of dormancy depth, spring phenology, and cold hardiness from 1952 to 2021. The maximum dormancy depth of the study species was observed between early October and early December, and thereafter decreased exponentially. The cold hardiness peaked in mid-winter (end of December) through cold acclimation and thereafter decreased in spring (deacclimation). During the past 70 years, the budburst date (first flowering date or first leaf date) of five species was estimated to have advanced significantly, and dormancy depth in early spring was predicted to have increased owing to the warming-associated decrease in chilling accumulation. However, cold hardiness has decreased because of weakened acclimation and accelerated deacclimation under a warming climate. The frost risk before and after budburst remained unchanged because of the reduction in occurrence and severity of low-temperature events and earlier late spring frosts. The present methods could be generalized to estimate and predict the seasonal changes in dormancy depth and cold hardiness of temperate species in the context of climate change.

Evaluation of Sample Preparation Practices Common with Differential Thermal Analysis of Grapevine Bud Cold Hardiness

<h3>Background and goals</h3> Differential thermal analysis (DTA) is a popular semi-automated method to determine the temperature at which plant tissues freeze. It is used to evaluate effects of environmental variables, genotypes, and agronomic practices on cold hardiness, and as an Extension tool to monitor cold hardiness and provide decision support for growers of many specialty crops. <h3>Methods and key findings</h3> This study evaluated common approaches in sampling and preparation of dormant grapevine compound buds for DTA to provide a reference point as to which adjustments might cause excessive variation in subsequent data. Common adjustments in sample preparation, such as using foil packets, moistened tissue paper, or bud orientation, had no consistent effects on DTA values, typically resulting in a variation of &lt;1°C. The same was true for storage (or shipping conditions) of 24 hrs or less, provided samples were maintained at low, but above-freezing temperatures (1.6 to 4°C). Finally, influence of bud position along the length of the cane was also inconsistent. <h3>Conclusions and significance</h3> The robust nature of DTA for estimating grapevine cold hardiness offsets the potential impact of variation introduced from different sample preparation methods. These results can help those wishing to develop DTA protocols or expand their capacity to conduct DTA analysis to design protocols to best suit their individual program needs. Consistency in DTA approach is likely more important than the specific methods used, especially when comparing relative differences in observed lethal temperatures.

Peach floral bud cold hardiness of eleven cultivars in western Colorado

Peach floral bud cold hardiness of eleven cultivars in western Colorado

A 15-year long assessment of cold hardiness of apricot flower buds and flowers during the blooming period

Long-term examinations are important for accurately dissecting the genotypic and environmental factors of and for predicting the possible impacts of climate change on quantitative traits, such as the frost tolerance of apricot generative organs during the floral developmental period. In our experimental work the cold hardiness of flower buds and flowers of three apricot cultivars [‘Ceglédi bíborkajszi’ (CBK), ‘Gönci magyar kajszi’ (GMK) and ‘Rózsakajszi C.1406’ (RK)] was studied systematically in different phenological stages, applying a standardised artificial freezing test protocol on samples collected from the orchard during a period of 15 consecutive years. Based on the results, both the genotypes and the years were highly significant components of frost tolerance; at the early phases the greater effect of years, while at the later stages that of the genotypes were detected. RK was frost tolerant and more stable across the years, while CBK was the most frost sensitive, which was accompanied by a significantly higher sensitivity to seasonal differences. Positive correlation was found between the starting time of blooming and frost tolerance of flowers, the significance of which intensified with the frost sensitivity of the apricot genotype. Significant associations were identified between various meteorological parameters of the 8-month period prevailing flowering and frost tolerance of apricot flowers during blooming. Possible effects of climate change on the local weather conditions were also detected with significant impacts on the phenological processes of floral buds, on the timing of flowering and on frost tolerance.

Freezing resistance and behavior of winter buds and canes of wine grapes cultivated in northern Japan

In high-latitude regions, the cold hardiness of buds and canes of grapevine is important for budburst time and yield in the next season. The freezing resistance of buds and canes sampled from six wine grapes currently cultivated in Hokkaido, Japan, all of them grown from autumn to winter, was investigated. A significant difference between the cultivars in their freezing resistance was detected in the buds harvested in winter. In addition, outstanding differences in the lower temperature exotherms (LTE) related to the supercooling ability of tissue cells happened in the winter buds, and there is a close relationship between freezing resistance and LTE detected in the winter buds. This suggests that the supercooling ability of tissue cells in winter buds is strongly related to the freezing resistance. However, detailed electron microscopy exposed that the differences in freezing resistance among cultivars appeared in freezing behavior of leaf primordium rather than apical meristem. This indicated that as the water mobility from the bud apical meristem to the spaces around the cane phloem progressed, the slightly dehydrated cells improved the supercooling ability and increased the freezing resistance.

Cold Hardiness of Cold Climate Interspecific Hybrid Grapevines Grown in a Cold Climate Region

Cold climate interspecific hybrid grapevines (CCIHG) selected for their superior midwinter cold hardiness have expanded grape production to cold climate regions. However, extreme weather events, such as polar vortexes and the high frequency of fall and spring freezes, often result in yield and vine losses. The main objective of this study was to evaluate changes in bud cold hardiness of five CCIHG cultivars grown in the upper Midwest to identify relative risk for freeze damage throughout the dormant period and to adapt a bud cold hardiness prediction model to CCIHG cultivars grown in cold climate regions. Bud cold hardiness was evaluated biweekly throughout the dormant period by measuring lethal temperatures for buds using differential thermal analysis (DTA). CCIHG cultivars in our study had an early acclimation response with increased levels of cold hardiness before the occurrence of freezing temperatures. Maximum levels of hardiness (-28 to -30°C) were observed both years in February; however, deeper levels of freezing stress resistance, probably attained by freeze dehydration, were not detected using DTA. CCIHG cultivars had a rapid deacclimation response that was accelerated with additional chilling accumulation during spring. The reparametrizing of a discrete-dynamic cold hardiness prediction model by expanding the range of ecodormant threshold temperatures for CCIHG resulted in predictions with an average root mean square error (RMSE) = 1.01. Although CCIHG cultivars have superior midwinter bud cold hardiness, fast deacclimation responses increase the risk of freeze damage during spring, thus this trait should be evaluated for future CCIHG cultivar release. The development of tools such as the discrete-dynamic cold hardiness prediction model for CCIHG cultivars will aid growers in decision-making to minimize damage and yield and vine losses.

Freezing stress damage and growth viability in Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait. bud structures.

After a freezing event, it can be challenging to extrapolate levels of freezing damage to plant growth viability based on the presence or absence of symptoms in specific bud tissues. This study investigated the relationship between freezing damage in terminal buds during ecodormancy and their viability during the subsequent growing season. We identified the bud structure that best explained this relationship, and developed a model to explain the changes in bud cold hardiness. Vertical shoots (uprights) of Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait. were sampled in central Wisconsin during Spring of 2018 and 2019. Sets of uprights with terminal buds were subjected to controlled freezing tests, followed by either visual freeze damage evaluation or assessment of shoot viability by growth assays. We determined the Browning Lethal‐Temperature50 (BLT50), as temperature for 50% damage (tissue browning) at each bud structure, and Growth Lethal‐Temperature50 (GLT50) temperature where 50% reduction in growth viability occurred. Two models were constructed to explain: (1) bud structure damage and growth viability, and (2) GLT50's seasonal changes, representing the cold hardiness variations, and environmental factors. The correlation between the BLT50 and GLT50 values was closest for the bud scales and bud axis, indicating the better correspondence between levels of freezing damage with the impact on the growth potential. In addition, the latter was also the most suitable candidate for modeling due to easier damage evaluation. The freezing stress damage of the bud axis explained comparatively best the resulting growth viability. Seasonal changes in GLT50 were best explained by temperature indices based on daily minimum and on maximum temperatures over 10‐day periods. However, among the model components, daily maximum temperatures had the greatest influence on V. macrocarpon cold hardiness changes during ecodormancy.

Relationship Between Bud Cold Hardiness and Budbreak in Two Vitis vinifera L Cultivars, Chardonnay and Thompson Seedless

The lack of winter cold is a severe limitation for the cultivation of grapevines (Vitis vinifera L) in areas with warm winter climates. This phenomenon is currently becoming quite important due to global warming, which will increase winter temperatures in many temperate regions of the planet where grapevines are cultivated. Although various physical and chemical stimuli have been used to address the lack of winter cold in grapevine cultivation, quantitative studies on its effects on different cultivars are limited. Here, the effects of (a) low temperatures during endodormancy (ED), (b) temperature increases during eco-dormancy (ECD) and (c) the effects of dormancy-breaking compounds such as hydrogen cyanamide (HC) and sodium azide (AZ) on the budburst of an early budbreak cultivar, Chardonnay, and an late budbreak cultivar, Thompson seedless, were assessed. The results were analysed by the Kaplan–Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to establish statistical significance between the control and treatments. In general, Chardonnay grapevines were more sensitive than Thompson seedless grapevines to all budbreak stimuli, and a temperature increase during ECD was the stimulus that had the greatest effect on the budbreak in both cultivars. Exposure to cold temperatures during ED increased the cold hardiness and improved the budbreak in both cultivars. Based on the results, a relationship between the degree of bud cold hardiness and budbreak potential is suggested, and it is proposed that the greater the cold hardiness achieved by the buds, the better their subsequent budbreak will be.

Freezing Tolerance and Chilling Fulfillment Differences in Cold Climate Grape Cultivars

Grapevine sustainability is impacted by the timing of dormancy initiation and freezing tolerance in fall and winter and chilling fulfillment and bud break in the spring. These traits have genetic and local temperature contributing factors; therefore, this study was undertaken to develop an understanding of these characteristics in four recently developed cold climate cultivars. The cold hardiness and chilling fulfillment profiles were monitored in Brianna, Frontenac gris, La Crescent and Marquette using differential thermal analyses and bud break assays. Bud cold hardiness of all cultivars increased with the declining temperatures from November through February, after which the buds began to lose freezing tolerance. There were significant differences in cold hardiness and chilling fulfillment between cultivars during the endodormant and ecodormant period of winter. Marquette had the greatest freezing tolerance from early November through midwinter suggesting it has potential as a sentinel cultivar for comparisons of new cold climate selections. Brianna was slower to acclimate and deacclimated more rapidly than the other cultivars. Chilling fulfillment under natural field or constant 4 °C conditions showed no main effect differences for chilling accumulation condition; however, there were significant cultivar, condition, and time point interactions, indicating the cultivars differed in chilling fulfillment responses.

Clone and Rootstock Interactions Influence the Cold Hardiness of Vitis vinifera cvs. Riesling and Sauvignon blanc

Cold damage is a threat to grapegrowers worldwide. Cold hardiness varies across Vitis vinifera cultivars, but the influence of clone and rootstock selection on this trait is unclear. Five clone x rootstock combinations of Riesling (clone 49 x Riparia Gloire (RG); 49 x SO4 Teleki; clone 239 x RG; 239 x SO4; 239 x Couderc 3309) and four clones of Sauvignon blanc (clone 242, 297, 376, and 530 on SO4 Teleki rootstock) were evaluated over three dormant seasons (2016/17, 2017/18, and 2018/19). Bud cold hardiness was quantified every two to four weeks by differential thermal analysis (DTA) and reported as low temperature exotherms (LTE). Yield and pruning weights were recorded every year. Rootstock did not consistently influence the cold hardiness of Riesling buds, although clone 239 was generally hardier than clone 49. Significant clone*rootstock interactions were observed more frequently in the first year of the study. No consistent differences were observed between Sauvignon blanc clones, although clone 242 and 297 were often amongst the least hardy clones. Differences in hardiness were not consistently related to yield, pruning weight or crop load in the prior growing season. This study demonstrates the importance of both clone and rootstock selection in cool climate regions where freeze injury may occur. Future research should consider the clone identity and the possibility of a clone x rootstock interaction when comparing the cold hardiness of different cultivars.

Cold Hardiness of Primary Buds of Wine and Table Grape Cultivars in Poland

The aim of this study was to compare the cold resistance of grapevine cultivars in field conditions. Following the winters of 2016/2017 and 2017/2018, an assessment of frost damage was carried out on the vines of 42 wine cultivars and 45 table grape cultivars grown in central Poland (Skierniewice, latitude 51.9627 N, longitude 20.1666 E). The minimum temperature for each of the two winters was recorded on 2017-01- 07 (-20.9°C) and on 2018-02-27 (-20.1°C). Among the assessed cultivars, 19 (13 wine grape cultivars and six table grape cultivars) belonged to V. vinifera species and 68 were inter- or inter-intraspecific hybrids. Cultivars were divided into five classes of different frost tolerance, with information on the proportion of primary buds frozen given in the brackets: very resistant (below 1.9%), resistant (2% to 24.9%), medium susceptible (2% to 74.9%), susceptible (75% to 95.9%) and very susceptible (above 96%). The number of wine and table grape cultivars in particular classes (mean for two winters) was as follows: very resistant – 20 (wine) and 10 (table), resistant – 15 and 13, medium susceptible – six and 20, susceptible – one and two. Both the V. vinifera cultivars and the interspecific hybrids were highly diversified in terms of frost tolerance. In most cultivars, the number of frozen buds after the winter of 2016/2017 was greater than after the winter of 2017/2018. Among V. vinifera, ‘Riesling’, ‘Pinot Noir’, ‘Chasselas Dore’ (reference) and ‘Tauberschwarz’, ‘Veltliner Fruhrot’ (‘Fruehroter Malvasier’), ‘Turan’, ‘Domina’, ‘Tressot Panache’, ‘Blue from Tychy’, and ‘Irsai Oliver’ were very resistant or resistant. Other cultivars of V. vinifera were medium susceptible or susceptible.

Differential thermal analysis sheds light on the effect of environment and cultivar in peach floral bud cold hardiness

Differential thermal analysis sheds light on the effect of environment and cultivar in peach floral bud cold hardiness

Testing the Ferguson model for the cold-hardiness of dormant grapevine buds in a temperate and subtropical valley of Chile.

A dynamic thermal time model (DTTM) has been developed to predict cold-hardiness in dormant grapevine buds, which uses daily mean temperatures as the only input variable. However, it has been recently reported that cold-hardiness in grapevine buds depends not only on low temperatures (LTs), but also on the content of the plant phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA). An important parameter in the DTTM is the ecodormancy boundary (EDB), which represents the chilling degree days (DDc) required for the transition of the buds from endo to ecodormancy. In this study, the bud cold-hardiness of grapevines was measured by the low-temperature exotherm (LTE) in the subtropical Elqui and in the temperate Maipo valleys of Chile, and the values fitted to the DTTM. Moreover, the ABA content was determined in dormant buds throughout the dormant season. The results demonstrated that the DTTM worked better in the Maipo than in the Elqui valley, and that the content of ABA in the buds was higher in the vines grown in the Elqui valley. On the other hand, the optimized EDB parameter value varied from year to year when it was estimated as chilling accumulated, but when it was estimated as time, it remained constant in the Maipo valley. Based on the results, we conclude the following: (a) the proper functioning of the DTTM requires that the ABA content profile in the dormant buds should be kept constant from year to year, (b) the highest content of ABA in the buds collected in the Elqui valley is probably due to abiotic stresses, (c) the EDB parameter corresponds to the accumulated cold until before the buds begin their deacclimation process and not until they release from endodormancy, (d) the release of the buds from endodormancy does not depend on the accumulated cold, but on the elapsed time.

Bud cold-hardiness of some Vitis vinifera L. cultivars during the dormant season of 2018/2019

Bud cold-hardiness of some Vitis vinifera L. cultivars during the dormant season of 2018/2019

X-ray phase contrast imaging of Vitis spp. buds shows freezing pattern and correlation between volume and cold hardiness

Grapevine (Vitis spp.) buds must survive winter temperatures in order to resume growth when suitable conditions return in spring. They do so by developing cold hardiness through deep supercooling, but the mechanistic process of supercooling in buds remains largely unknown. Here we use synchrotron X-ray phase contrast imaging to study cold hardiness-related characteristics of V. amurensis, V. riparia, and V. vinifera buds: time-resolved 2D imaging was used to visualize freezing; and microtomography was used to evaluate morphological changes during deacclimation. Bud cold hardiness was determined (low temperature exotherms; LTEs) using needle thermocouples during 2D imaging as buds were cooled with a N2 gas cryostream. Resolution in 2D imaging did not allow for ice crystal identification, but freezing was assessed by movement of tissues coinciding with LTE values. Freezing was observed to propagate from the center of the bud toward the outer bud scales. The freezing events observed lasted several minutes. Additionally, loss of supercooling ability appears to be correlated with increases in bud tissue volume during the process of deacclimation, but major increases in volume occur after most of the supercooling ability is lost, suggesting growth resumption processes are limited by deacclimation state.