Bucket-handle Meniscus Research Articles

Posterior Cruciate Buckling Angle Variations Are Associated with Different Patterns of Medial Meniscus Tears in Anterior-Cruciate-Deficient Knees: Results of a Prospective Comparative Magnetic Imaging Resonance Study.

The diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear relies on clinical evaluation and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Direct and indirect signs of ACL tear have been described with MRI evaluation. Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) buckling has been described as an indirect radiographic sign of an ACL tear. The aim of the present study was to assess the variations in PCL buckling angles in patients with ACL tears and in patients with isolated lesions in the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. In addition, the influence of different patterns of medial meniscus tears in ACL-deficient knees was investigated. Finally, the influences of risk factors such as tibial slope, delay from injury to surgery, absence of medial meniscus tear, degree of Lachman and pivot shift testing were also assessed. This was a cohort study. A total of 154 patients (78 in the group with ACL tear and 76 in the control group) were assessed with MRI and lateral weight-bearing X-ray to assess PCL buckling angle and tibial slope by two independent observers. The presence of a medial meniscus bucket handle or ramp lesion of the medial meniscus was assessed and recorded at the time of surgery. PCL buckling angle measurement was highly reliable, with an ICC of 0.866 and 0.894, respectively, in the study group and the control group for interobserver reliability. The intrarater reliability was found to be high in PCL buckling angle for the study group [ICC = 0.955] and the control group [ICC = 0.943]. The mean angle in patients with ACL tear was 110.7 ± 15.2° and 115.3 ± 16.2° (for the two examiners) and 111.4 ± 12° and 114 ± 14.5° (for the two examiners) in patients with an intact, healthy ACL. An association emerged between bucket handle tears of the medial meniscus (p = 0.010) and a decreased PCL buckling angle and between ramp lesions of the medial meniscus and increased PCL buckling angle both (p = 0.024). Good inter- and intraobserver reliability for the measurement of the PCL buckling angle was observed. Increased PCL buckling angle values were observed in patients with concomitant ACL and bucket handle tears of the medial meniscus, while decreased angle values were observed in those who had ACL tear and ramp lesion of the medial meniscus. No statistically significant difference in the PCL buckling angle emerged between patients with ACL tears and those who had a healthy, intact ACL.

Repair of bucket handle meniscus tears improves patient outcomes versus partial meniscectomy at the time of ACL reconstruction.

The aim of this study was to examine demographic and surgical factors that influence patient-reported knee function in patients who undergo anterior crucial ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with concurrent bucket-handle meniscal tear (BHMT) procedures. We hypothesized that repair of BHMT in the setting of concomitant ACLR and shorter time from injury to surgery would lead to improved patient-reported outcomes. Forty-one patients (mean age: 28.0 ± 9.8 years, 72% male) with BHMT at the time of ACLR completed the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF) via online survey at an average of 15.2 months postop. Patient demographics and surgical characteristics, including time from injury to surgery, were compared between repair (n = 22) and meniscectomy (n = 19) groups using one-way analysis of variances; distributions of sex, graft source, BHMT compartment and zone were compared between groups using χ 2 tests. The association between IKDC-SKF score, demographics and surgical characteristics was evaluated using multivariable linear regression. A priori alpha level was p < 0.05. Meniscal repair and meniscectomy groups differed based on graft source and BHMT zone but not IKDC-SKF score (p = 0.085). Patients undergoing ACLR with autograft (p = 0.003) and with red-red zone BHMT (p < 0.001) more often underwent meniscal repair. The regression model demonstrated longer time from injury to surgery (p = 0.049), red-red tear zone (p = 0.04) and meniscectomy (p = 0.008); these were predictive of poorer IKDC-SKF scores. BHMT repair was more likely performed in ACL autograft and on red-red zone tears. Longer time from injury to surgery is an indicator of poorer IKDC-SKF score, as this may increase the risk of concomitant pathologies. White-white zone BHMTs are associated with better IKDC-SKF scores than red-red zone BHMTs, which may be due to the smaller volume of tissue removed during meniscectomy of white-white zone tears and the avoidance of iatrogenic complications of meniscal repair. Level III, therapeutic study.

Poster 303: Outcomes Following Repair of Radial Meniscus Tears Compared to Bucket Handle Meniscus Tears

Objectives: Preserving the meniscus has become a priority in managing meniscal tears with advancement of meniscus repair techniques. Meniscal repair, as opposed to partial meniscectomy, reduces risk of development and progression of knee osteoarthritis. Radial meniscus tears have traditionally been associated with a poor prognosis because they occur perpendicular to circumferential meniscal fibers, compromising hoop tension. Advances in surgical technique and biologic augmentation have facilitated repair of these complex injuries. The purpose of this study was to compare post-operative complication and surgical revision rates in patients who underwent repair of a radial meniscus tear versus bucket-handle meniscus tear. We hypothesized the outcomes of repair of radial meniscus tear would be similar to a matched group of patients who underwent repair of a bucket handle meniscus tear. Methods: A retrospective study was performed to identify patients who underwent repair of radial meniscus tear. Chart review was performed for 1506 patients who underwent meniscus repair from 2012 to 2019, and demographic information, type of meniscus tear, concomitant ACL reconstruction, post-operative complications, repeat surgeries, and failure at the repair site were detailed in a database. Patients who underwent repair of a radial tear were matched with patients who underwent repair of a bucket-handle tear based on sex, age (within 5 years), BMI (within 5 kg/m2), meniscus laterality, and concomitant ACL reconstruction. Isolated meniscus repairs were augmented with platelet rich plasma (PRP). Results: Fifty patients (age, 31.8 ± 15.2 years; BMI, 30.2 ± 6.4 kg/m2) were identified who underwent a radial meniscus tear repair. Of these patients, 16 (32.0%) were female and 23 (46.0%) underwent concomitant ACL reconstruction. Complications including recurrent swelling, stiffness, persistent pain, and repeat injury were reported in 15 patients (30.0%). Six patients underwent repeat surgery (12.0%). Four repeat surgical patients, who had previously undergone meniscus repair and concomitant ACL reconstruction, were found to have an intact radial repair at the time of second surgery, and underwent repeat surgery for a reason unrelated to the radial tear repair (e.g. cyclops lesion, synovectomy, new meniscus tear). Two patients had a radial tear repair failure that required surgical revision (4.0%). Radial tear repair patients who underwent concomitant ACL reconstruction differed significantly from those who did not only in age (ACL group, 26.0 ± 10.9 y; non-ACL group, 36.6 ± 16.7 y; p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in post-operative complications, repeat surgeries, or failures between the radial and bucket-handle tear repair patients. Conclusions: Repair of radial meniscus tears with contemporary techniques and biological enhancement with either ACL reconstruction or PRP can be expected to have similar outcomes to repairs of bucket handle meniscus tears.

All-Inside and Inside-Out Repair Techniques for Bucket-Handle Meniscus Tears Both Result in Improved Patient Outcomes and a Broad Range of Failure Rates: A Systematic Review

To compare patient-reported outcomes, failure rates, risk factors for failure, and complications in patients with bucket-handle meniscus tears (BHMTs) undergoing repair with inside-out (IO) versus all-inside (AI) techniques. A literature search was performed using the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases from database inception to August 2023 according to the 2020 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. The inclusion criteria consisted of Level I to IV clinical studies published in the past 10 years with greater than 2 years of follow-up that evaluated patient-reported outcome scores and/or the incidence of failure after IO or AI repairs for BHMTs. Clinical studies not reporting outcomes or failure rates, older studies using outdated implants, animal studies, reviews, letters to the editor, case reports, cadaveric studies, and articles not written in the English language or with English-language translation were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria. Outcomes were reported as ranges and qualitatively compared. A total of 16 studies published from 2013 to 2023, consisting of 1,062 patients with BHMTs, were identified. Thirteen studies (14 cohorts, 649 patients) reported on AI repair (mean age range, 23.7-32 years) and 7 studies (7 cohorts, 413 patients) reported on IO repair (mean age range, 16.7-34.6 years). Both groups had improved postoperative Lysholm and Tegner scores. Decreased range of motion was the most commonly reported complication in the AI group (range, 2.6%-4%), whereas adhesions for arthrofibrosis were the most commonly reported complication in the IO group (n= 12; range, 6%-7.9%). The overall reported failure rate ranged from 6.9% to 20.5% within the AI group and from 0% to 20% within the IO group. AI and IO repair techniques for BHMTs both result in improved Lysholm and Tegner scores. However, broad ranges of failure are reported in the literature, with overall failure rates ranging from 6.9% to 20.5% after AI repair and from 0% to 20% after IO repair. Younger age and isolated medial BHMT repair are the most frequently reported risk factors for the AI technique, whereas postoperative stiffness is the most frequently reported complication after both repair techniques. Level IV, systematic review of Level I to IV studies.

OUTCOME OF TREATMENT FOLLOWING PRIMARY ARTHROSCOPIC REPAIR OF BUCKET HANDLE MENISCUS TEARS IN ADULTS

AimsWe studied the outcomes following arthroscopic primary repair of bucket handle meniscus tears to determine the incidence of re-tears and the functional outcomes of these patients.MethodologyProspective cohort study. Over a 4-year period (2016 to 2020), 35 adult patients presented with a bucket handle tear of the meniscus. Arthroscopic meniscal repair was performed using either the all inside technique or a combination of all-inside and inside-out techniques. 15 patients also underwent simultaneous arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Functional knee scores were assessed using IKDC and Lysholm scores.ResultsMean patient age at surgery was 27 years (range, 17 to 53years). Medial meniscus was torn in 20 and lateral in 15 cases. Zone of tear was white on white in 19, red on white in 9 and red on red in 7 cases. Average delay from injury to surgery was 4 months. At a mean follow-up of 4.5 years, the meniscus repair failed in 3 patients (8.5 %). Outcome following re-tear was meniscus excision. Average IKDC scores in patients with intact repair were 74.04 against 56.67 in patients with a failed repair (p&lt; 0.0001). Similarly, Lyshlom scores were 88.96 and 67.333, respectively (p&lt;0.0001).ConclusionThe survivorship of primary repair of bucket handle meniscus tears in our series was 91.5% at medium term follow-up. Functional outcomes were significantly poor in patients with a failed repair compared to those with an intact repair.

“Posteromedial Knee Incision for Combined Inside-Out and Outside-In Meniscal Repair: A Technical Note”

A 17-year-old boy presented with a left medial meniscus bucket handle tear. The patient had been experiencing pain and swelling in his knee for several weeks. The pain was exacerbated when he went up and down stairs or when he tried to twist his knee. The patient underwent arthroscopic surgery to repair the tear. The surgeon performed an inside-out repair for the posterior horn of the meniscus. However, access to the anterior body and horn was challenging. The surgeon had an idea on the spot to do an outside-in repair using the same incision but instead of using spinal needles, he used the same long (inside-out) needles after cutting them short. The meniscus was reduced and fixed. The patient recovered uneventfully and returned to full activity.

High failure rate after medial meniscus bucket handle tears repair in the stable knee

BackgroundIt is nowadays recommended to “Save the meniscus“. This paradigm is based on the affirmation that an extended meniscectomy exposes to the risk of long-term secondary osteoarthritis and the global failure rate of a longitudinal tear repair remains low, whether it is the medial or lateral meniscus, with or without anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, each kind of lesion has to be studied separate. PurposeThe study aimed to focus on a homogeneous population of isolated repair of the bucket handle tear (BHT) of the medial meniscus (MM) in patients with stable knees to evaluate failure rate at a minimum of three years of follow-up. The secondary objectives were to evaluate any risk factors or protective factors of failure, clinical outcomes, and secondary amount of meniscectomy in failure cases compared to the amount of meniscus fixed in the first surgery. MethodsAll patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of a BHT of the MM situated in the red-on-red or red-on white (RW) zone on a stable knee between January 2010 and December 2018 were evaluated retrospectively. Failure was defined as a need for reoperation for recurrence of meniscal symptoms (pain, locking) on the medial side with per-operative confirmation of the absence of healing. The following parameters were studied: demographics (age, gender, BMI), time from injury to surgery, clinical scores (Tegner, Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC]), surgical findings (extent and zone of the tear), surgical management (number and type of suture). ResultsThirty-nine patients were included. The mean follow-up was 77.2±24.4 [36–141] months. Twenty-seven (69%) failures were recorded. In 56% (15/27) of the reoperations, the meniscectomy amount was smaller than what it would have been done in the first surgery. All clinical scores improved significantly from pre- to post-operatively; all patients met minimal clinically important differences for all the scores. No risk factors were found significant in the multivariate analysis. ConclusionRepairing an isolated BHT of the MM is associated with a high failure rate. Despite the failure, we observed that the meniscectomy area was smaller than documented in the primary surgery in most of the cases and repair must still be considered as the first option. Level of evidenceIV; retrospective cohort series.

MRI in the Diagnosis of Bucket Handle Tears: What Is the Current Situation?

Introduction The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of current magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of bucket-handle meniscal tears. Materials and methods Patients treated for arthroscopic meniscal tears between March 2019 and March 2022 were reviewed. The current study included all patients with bucket handle tears diagnosed arthroscopically and having MRI scans (n=51). A control group of 58 individuals with similar demographic characteristics and meniscal tears apart from bucket handle tears was also formed. The assessment of bucket handle and non-bucket handle tears was performed blindly by a musculoskeletal (MSK) radiologist with 20 years of experience and a trainee radiologist, achieving consensus on group allocation.The MRIs were examined for various findings, including the presence of a bucket handle tear, tear location, presence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture, intercondyler notch sign, double anterior horn sign, flipped meniscus sign, double posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) sign, absent bow sign, and the disproportionate posterior horn sign. These well-known signs, detailed in the literature, were evaluated. Additionally, less studied and less commonly known signs such as the V sign and double anterior cruciate ligament sign were assessed.The V sign appears similarly to the letter V, resulting from the displacement of the bucket handle tear and the angle of the intact meniscus on axial images. The double anterior cruciate ligament sign is the appearance formed by the compression of the displaced meniscal part behind the anterior cruciate ligament in bucket handle tears. Results Following the retrospective evaluation of MRI scans, 44 out of 51 tears diagnosed as bucket handle tears by arthroscopy were accurately identified (sensitivity: 86.27%). The same conclusion was reached for MRI scans in 52 out of 58 tears where arthroscopy did not detect a bucket handle tear (specificity: 89.66%). The most prevalent MRI signs in patients with bucket handle tears identified by arthroscopy in the study were the intercondylar notch sign (84.31%), V sign (72.55%), double PCL sign (56.86%), double anterior horn sign (49.02%), absent bow sign (43.14%), flipped meniscus sign (19.61%), disproportionate posterior horn sign (9.80%), and double ACL sign (5.88%). The intercondylar notch sign, V sign, and double PCL sign exhibited the highest sensitivity, while flipped meniscus, disproportionate posterior horn, and double ACL sign demonstrated the highest specificity. Conclusion MRI demonstrates a high level of sensitivity and specificity in identifying meniscal bucket handle tears, particularly when considering the eight MRI signs investigated in this study.

OUTCOME OF TREATMENT FOLLOWING ARTHROSCOPIC REPAIR OF BUCKET HANDLE MENISCUS TEARS IN ADULTS

AbstractAimsWe studied the outcomes following arthroscopic primary repair of bucket handle meniscus tears to determine the incidence of re-tears and the functional outcomes of these patients.MethodologyProspective cohort study. Over a 4-year period (2016 to 2020), 35 adult patients presented with a bucket handle tear of the meniscus. Arthroscopic meniscal repair was performed using either the all inside technique or a combination of all-inside and inside-out techniques. 15 patients also underwent simultaneous arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Functional knee scores were assessed using IKDC and Lysholm scores.ResultsMean patient age at surgery was 27 years (range, 17 to 53years). Medial meniscus was torn in 20 and lateral in 15 cases. Zone of tear was white on white in 19, red on white in 9 and red on red in 7 cases. Average delay from injury to surgery was 4 months. At a mean follow-up of 4.5 years, the meniscus repair failed in 3 patients (8.5 %). Outcome following re-tear was meniscus excision. Average IKDC scores in patients with intact repair were 74.04 against 56.67 in patients with a failed repair (p&lt; 0.0001). Similarly, Lyshlom scores were 88.96 and 67.333, respectively (p&lt;0.0001).ConclusionThe survivorship of primary repair of bucket handle meniscus tears in our series was 91.5% at medium term follow-up. Functional outcomes were significantly poor in patients with a failed repair compared to those with an intact repair.

The Posteromedial-Transseptal Portal for Arthroscopic Suture Hook Repair of Posterior Horn Tears and Popliteomeniscal Fascicles Tears of the Lateral Meniscus

We present a convenient and safe arthroscopic technique for suturing the lateral meniscus. In this technique, the clinician establishes a conventional posteromedial approach in the figure-of-four position of the knee by using the anterolateral and anteromedial observation approaches. Behind the posterior cruciate ligament, an operational approach is formed through the posterior mediastinum of the knee joint. Through this approach, suture hook can be brought to the posterior horn and body of the lateral meniscus, thus simplifying the suture of the lateral meniscus. We have used this technique to finish all-inside suture using suture hooks in a variety of types of lateral meniscal injuries, including longitudinal posterior horn tears, bucket handle meniscus tears, and tears around the popliteal hiatus area. Compared with traditional lateral meniscal all-inside suture technology through anteromedial or anterolateral approaches, this technology can suture more accurately, safely, and conveniently, avoid the involvement of the popliteal tendon suture, and the lower risk of complications such as popliteal vascular and nerve injury occur.

Prior Isolated Medial Bucket-Handle Meniscus Repair Significantly Increases Risk of Subsequent Ipsilateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Analysis of 438 Patients

Prior Isolated Medial Bucket-Handle Meniscus Repair Significantly Increases Risk of Subsequent Ipsilateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Analysis of 438 Patients

Previous Isolated Medial Bucket-Handle Meniscus Repair Significantly Increases Risk of Subsequent Ipsilateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

(1) To define the incidence of surgically treated isolated bucket-handle meniscus tears (BHMTs); (2) to investigate risk of subsequent ipsilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in patients who underwent previous isolated bucket handle (BH) meniscus repair; and (3) to investigate the risk of subsequent ACLR for various types of surgically treated meniscal tears. A retrospective review of a national database was conducted to identify patients, aged 10 to 40 years, who underwent primary isolated BH meniscus surgery from 2015 to 2020. Patients were stratified by operative method. A control group of 500,000 age-matched patients was randomly selected to establish a benchmark rate of ACLR. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare the timing and incidence of subsequent ipsilateral ACLR after primary isolated BH meniscus surgery to the control group within 2 and 5 years. In total, 1,767 patients with isolated BHMTs treated with surgery were identified and met inclusion criteria. The incidence of isolated BHMTs among all surgically treated (repair or meniscectomy) meniscal injuries was 1.67%. Isolated BH repairs had significantly greater odds of ACLR within 5 years compared to the control group (odds ratio [OR] 6.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.86-12.99; P < .001). Medial BH repairs had the greatest odds of ACLR within 5 years (OR 9.15; 95% CI 4.27-19.57; P < .001). Lateral BH repair was not associated with subsequent ipsilateral ACLR within 5 years (OR 2.63; CI 0.37-18.90; P= .340). Isolated BHMTs comprised 1.67% of all surgically treated meniscal injuries. Patients who underwent prior surgery for isolated BHMT were at increased risk of undergoing subsequent ipsilateral ACLR compared with the general population. Isolated medial BHMTs treated with repair had the highest risk for subsequent ACLR. Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Soft tissue injury prediction using joint depression in computed tomography in AO 41B lateral tibial plateau fractures.

Tibial plateau fractures are usually associated with soft tissue injury. This study aimed to use the extent of joint depression and lateral widening in computed tomography (CT) to predict the soft tissue injury accompanying fractures.The study included 23 patients with type Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen-classified 41B fractures. Demographics, mechanism of injury, age, gender, and injury sites were assessed. Post-traumatic radiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and CT were obtained. MRI evaluated the meniscal, cruciate, and collateral ligament injuries, and CT measured the extent of joint depression and lateral widening in millimeters using digital imaging software. The relationship between joint depression, lateral widening, and soft tissue injuries was statistically analyzed. Of the 23 patients, 17 (74%) were males and 6 (26%) were females. Lateral meniscus injuries increased and the risk of bucket handle lateral meniscus tears increased as the CT joint depression exceeded 12 mm (p < 0.05). Joint depression of <5.9 mm was associated with medial meniscus injury (p < 0.05). The mean distribution examination of all soft tissue injuries and joint depression revealed no statistically significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05). Increased joint depression in lateral tibial plateau fractures increases the risk of lateral meniscus bucket handle tear, and decreased joint depression increases the risk of medial meniscus injury. Accordingly implementing the treatment plan and patient management will improve the clinical outcomes.

Clinical outcome and healing rate after meniscal bucket handle tear repair

BackgroundReports combining patient-reported outcome measures, clinical evaluation, and radiographic assessment of postoperative healing after arthroscopic repair of bucket-handle meniscal tears (BHMT) are scarce.MethodsPatients who underwent arthroscopic repair for acute traumatic BHMTs between October 2011 and March 2016 with a minimum follow-up of two years were included. Postoperative outcome scores comprised the International Knee Documentation Society Score (IKDC), Lysholm score, Tegner activity score (TAS), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Clinical meniscal healing failure was assessed according to Barrett’s criteria. Side-to-side difference in knee laxity was measured using KT-2000. Radiographic healing was assessed by 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and classified according to Henning’s criteria at final follow-up.ResultsForty patients with a mean age of 32.0 ± 11.5 years were available for follow-up after 51.8 ± 14.3 months. Revision surgery by means of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy was performed in four patients (10%) prior to the follow-up visit. The clinical healing rate was 83.3% at final follow-up. Mean IKDC score was 82.8 ± 13.8 and Lysholm score was 77.4 ± 24.8. Of all patients, 87.5% reached or exceeded the patient-acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) criteria for the IKDC score at final follow-up. The median TAS was 6 and VAS for pain was 0.46 ± 0.9. Side-to-side difference in knee laxity was higher in patients with concomitant ACL reconstruction (2.1 ± 2.7 mm) compared to isolated BHMTs (1.0 ± 2.0 mm). MR examination showed 69.4% healed, 25.0% partially healed, and 5.6% unhealed menisci.ConclusionPatients who underwent repair for acute traumatic BHMTs achieved good to excellent clinical outcome along with a high rate of meniscal healing at a minimum follow-up of two years. Clinical and radiological healing rates were similarly satisfactory and most patients exceeded the PASS criteria for the IKDC score. Patients were able to reach a high postoperative activity level.Level of evidenceCase Series; IV.

Bucket-Handle Meniscus Tear Management With Meniscectomy Versus Repair Correlates With Patient, Socioeconomic, and Hospital Factors.

Bucket-handle meniscus tears are common knee injuries that are often treated surgically with meniscectomy or meniscal repair. Although clinical factors may influence the choice of one treatment approach over the other, the influence of patient, socioeconomic, and hospital factors remains poorly characterized. This study aimed to estimate the relative nationwide utilization of these two procedures and delineate a variety of factors that are associated with the selection of one treatment approach over the other. Meniscal repair and meniscectomy procedures conducted for isolated bucket-handle meniscus tears in 2016 and 2017 were identified in the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample database. Cases were weighted using nationally representative discharge weights. Univariate analyses and a multivariable logistic regression model were used to compare patient, socioeconomic, and hospital factors associated with meniscal repair versus meniscectomy. In total, 12,239 cases were identified, which represented 17,236 cases after weighting. Of these, meniscal repair was conducted for 4,138 (24.0%). Based on the logistic regression model, meniscal repair was less likely for older and sicker patients. By contrast, several factors were associated with markedly higher odds of undergoing meniscal repair compared with meniscectomy. These included urban teaching hospitals; geographic location in the midwest, south, and west; and higher median household income. Using a large nationally representative cohort, the current data revealed that only 24.0% of surgically treated bucket-handle meniscus tears were treated using repair. Identification of patient, socioeconomic, and hospital factors differentially associated with meniscal repair suggest that other factors may systematically influence surgical decision-making for this patient population. Surgeons should be conscious of these potential healthcare disparities when determining the optimal treatment for their patients. Level III.

The posterior cruciate ligament-posterior femoral cortex angle: a reliable and accurate MRI method to quantify the buckling phenomenon of the PCL in ACL-deficient knees.

The aim was to validate a new MRI method to measure the buckling phenomenon of the PCL, representative of anterior tibial translation, by comparing its reliability and accuracy to identify anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees with existing methods. Patients were selected retrospectively and separated into a group of primary ACL injuries and ACL-intact knees. Exclusion criteria were: skeletal immaturity, PCL or a concomitant collateral ligament injury, signs of osteoarthritis (> 1 Kellgren and Lawrence score), tibial plateau fracture, previous ACL reconstruction or displaced meniscal bucket handle tear. The assessment of the curvature of the anterolateral bundle of the PCL was performed on T2 sagittal MRI slices according to 3 methods: (1) the PCL angle (PCLA), (2) the PCL inclination angle (PCLIA) and (3) a new method: the PCL-posterior cortex angle (PCL-PCA), representing the angle between the vertical part of the PCL-ALB and the posterior diaphyseal cortex of the femur. For each method, the inter- and intra-observer reliability was measured. The ability to discriminate both ACL-deficient and ACL-intact knees was evaluated using ROC curves. Twenty-four patients were included in each group. Intra-observer reliability was excellent for all 3 methods (ICCs > 0.90). Inter-observer reliability was excellent for the PCL-PCA (ICC > 0.90) and good for the PCLA and the PCLIA (ICCs between 0.75 and 0.90). The PCL-PCA had the highest precision (lowest standard error of measurement: 2.7°). It yielded an excellent discrimination between the ACL and CTL groups (AUC 0.80 [0.67-0.93]) with the highest sensitivity (71% [52.8-89.2]) and specificity (88% [75-100]) for a positive threshold when the angle was ≤ 22.7°. The PCLA and PCLIA methods led to acceptable discrimination and lower sensitivities and specificities (PCLA: AUC 0.71, sensitivity 63%, specificity 79%, threshold ≤ 117.9°; PCLIA: AUC 0.62, sensitivity 50%, specificity 83%, threshold ≤ 21.4°). In comparison with previously described methods, the PCL-PCA was the most reliable and accurate method to measure the PCL buckling phenomenon on MRI in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees. It offers an easy and objective method for the follow-up of ACL-injured patients and can therefore be recommended for routine use. IV.

Return to sports after bucket handle medial meniscus tear repair using inside out technique in recreational sports players.

The main purpose of our study is to determine the outcomes of bucket handle medial meniscus tears repaired with the inside out technique in recreational sports players, and the return of these to pre-injury sports levels. 41 athletes with medial meniscus bucket handle tear were included in the study. 28 cases were associated with ACL tear while rest were isolated tears. Medial meniscus repair was done exclusively with arthroscopy assisted inside out technique. Lysholm score, IKDC score and Tegner staging were used to evaluate functional status of patients with minimum 1-year follow-up. Data was analyzed using Wilcoxon Matched pairs test, and Friedman test. All patients were examined clinically at regular intervals. Lysholm score and IKDC score showed significant increase in their values. Tegner staging showed no significant change compared to their preinjury game level. On VAS pain scale, there was significant decrease in their pain at regular follow up intervals. 2 patients had re-tears of the repaired medial meniscus. Repairing bucket handle tears of the medial meniscus in recreational sports players with the inside out technique yields good results in terms of clinical and functional outcomes. It successfully allows them to return to sports at 1 year.

Poster 246: Comparison of Meniscectomy versus Repair in Bucket Handle Meniscus Tears: Analysis of a Large, Contained Cohort Study

Objectives:o evaluate the long-term risk of subsequent ipsilateral knee surgery in patients who underwent a bucket handle meniscus repair (BHMR) versus meniscectomy and assess risk factors associated with subsequent knee surgical intervention.Methods:We performed an electronic health records search for all patients who underwent arthroscopic knee meniscus surgery (repair and meniscectomy) from 2011 to 2018. Natural language processing was used to search for terms of interest in the long operative notes to determine if these surgeries were performed for bucket handle meniscus tears. These patients comprised our initial cohort. Study subjects were followed for at least one year and up to five years with censoring at death, membership disenrollment, or 12/31/2019. Baseline patient characteristics and outcomes (i.e., subsequent operative procedures, deep surgical site infections, and deep venous thrombosis) were evaluated via a database review. The primary outcome was subsequent ipsilateral knee surgeries and secondary outcomes included contralateral knee surgeries, deep surgical site infections, and venous thrombotic events. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to model for subsequent surgical treatment of the ipsilateral knee. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. We then performed a subset analysis for patients 30-50 years-old.Results:The mean follow-up time was 3.9 years (standard deviation [SD] 1.3 years). A total of 1359 patients underwent meniscus repair and 1537 patients underwent meniscectomy for a bucket-handle meniscus tear. The mean age was 27 (SD 10.9) years for the repair group versus 37.5 (SD 13.1) for the meniscectomy group (P<0.001). BMI was significantly lower in the meniscus repair compared to the meniscectomy group (P<0.001). BHMR was significantly more likely to be performed during a concomitant ipsilateral ACL reconstruction than a meniscectomy (44.2% vs 30.1%, P<0.001). During the follow-up period, a total of 656 subsequent ipsilateral procedures were performed in 393 (13.6%) patients. Patient who underwent initial BHMR were at a significantly higher risk to undergo subsequent meniscus repair (4.3% vs 1%, P<0.001), meniscus debridement (12.1% vs 3.3%, P<0.001), and ACL reconstruction (7.4% vs 2.9%, P<0.001) compared to initial meniscectomy. Multivariate analysis showed that BHMR, younger age, and lower BMI were risk factors in subsequent ipsilateral surgery. After adjusting for patient demographic and clinical characteristics, subset analysis showed for age 30-50 year-old patients, undergoing a BHMR versus a meniscectomy led to a 2.3-times higher risk of subsequent surgery, with a 5.3-times higher risk of subsequent meniscus repair and a 3.2-times risk of subsequent meniscectomy.Conclusions:BHMR is more often performed in younger, lower BMI individuals especially during a concomitant ACL reconstruction. BHMR are more likely to undergo subsequent surgeries which decreases with regards to increasing age. Subset analyses showed increasing risk for subsequent surgeries with BHMR versus meniscectomy in the age 30-50 years-old cohort.

The Effects of The Covid-19 Pandemic on Pediatric Orthopaedic Sports Medicine &amp; Arthroscopy: Practice Implications, and The Management and Triaging of Surgical Cases

Background:The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on pediatric sports medicine patients. Many surgeons found themselves simultaneously managing surgical pathology, concerns of exposure, and limited resources. This led to challenging decisions regarding relative patient and case urgency.Purpose:1. Define through expert opinion the relative urgency of prototypical pediatric arthroscopic surgical cases 2. Define current practices regarding pre-surgical testing and findings relevant to the recent, current, and potentially forthcoming challenges inherent to the COVID-19 pandemic. We further gathered information regarding variability of current practices and access to resources.Methods:A mixed-methods survey was performed of the POSNA membership, specific to surgeons identifying as sub-specialized in pediatric sports medicine. A clinical vignette style survey was developed by the POSNA QSVI: Sports Committee. Cases included patients with a: meniscal tear, a bucket handle meniscus tear, ACL tear, unstable osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesion of the knee, locked knee due to a loose body, OCD of the capitellum, recurrent and primary shoulder instability, traumatic patellar instability with a loose osteochondral fragment, and a patient with a symptomatic discoid meniscus. The survey further asked how resource limitations could impact surgical decision-making, and how pre-operative testing might impact surgical timing and decisions. Information regarding personal and institutional experiences and limitations during the first 6 months of the pandemic was also collected.Results:There were 119 survey respondents, of whom 54 met inclusion criteria. Seventy-five percent were primarily based at a university or academic hospital. Almost 56% of respondents had all scheduled cases cancelled for 4-7 weeks, 22% for 8-11 weeks, and 17% were shut down for more than 12 weeks. Forty-two percent followed guidance from an orthopaedic governing body, most commonly national orthopaedic organizations. There was significant variation in pre-operative testing protocols, ranging from screening questions to PCR testing and rapid testing. Triaging factors chosen by respondents for determining relative urgency, in order, were: Diagnosis, severity of symptoms/pathology, duration of symptoms, age, activity level, originally planned surgical date, and patient request. Each clinical vignette elicited variability in responses, but each had clear leaders in opinion regarding relative urgency. Most cases had more than 2/3 of respondents in relative agreement with respect to urgency.Conclusion:This study provides comparative details of the challenges and resource limitations experienced in pediatric sports medicine, and provides much-needed sub-specialty opinions on standards with respect to relative urgency and triaging for related cases. These experiences and opinions may be of benefit when advocating for patient access and care.

Two case reports of ring lateral meniscus - A rare anatomical variant

IntroductionThe ring-shaped meniscus is an infrequent anatomical aberration with very few previous reports. Comparatively, these are reported more commonly in the lateral meniscus than the medial meniscus. Most often they are quiescent and rarely cause any symptom unless for an associated tear or parameniscal cyst. Thorough history taking, proper examination, adequate imaging along with arthroscopic evaluation is essential for diagnosing and treating these anomalies appropriately. Case reportsWe report two cases of asymptomatic ring lateral meniscus. The first patient was a 15-year-old girl with ACL insufficiency and the second patient was a 38-year-old doctor with medial meniscus bucket handle tear, three years post anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy revealed a stable ring lateral meniscus in both patients. Since these were incidental findings with no correlation to the patient's presenting complaints, it was decided not to touch them. ConclusionAberrations of lateral meniscus are many and the ring-shaped meniscus is one amongst the rarest. Knowledge of these malformation is essential to identify and initiate appropriate intervention as needed.