Broken Screws Research Articles

Clinical and surgical factors influencing screw breakage during hardware removal following periacetabular osteotomy

Abstract Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a procedure used to treat patients with hip dysplasia. Current literature reports symptomatic hardware removal (HWR) rates of 13.6% following PAO. No reports have examined the incidence of or factors relating to screw breakage during HWR. This study reports the incidence of screw breakage in patients undergoing HWR following PAO and examines the associated clinical and surgical factors. Patients who underwent PAO by a single surgeon from 2012 to 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic, surgical, and implant information was collected. Constructs were stratified by number (three-screw and four-screw) and type (3.5 mm only, 4.5 mm only, and mixed). Incidence rates of HWR and screw breakage were calculated. Three hundred and two hips from 254 patients undergoing PAO were included. Seventy-one hips from 58 patients underwent HWR (23.5%). Eighteen of 259 screws (6.9%) were broken upon removal in 10/71 hips (14.1%). Significantly more 3.5-mm screws were removed (24.7% vs 21.2%; P = .05) and broken than 4.5-mm screws (10.5% vs 3.8%; P = .04). Time to removal was significantly longer in broken screws (16.8 ± 12.7 months vs 33 ± 18.2 months, P < .001). The use of 3.5-mm screws and increased time from implantation to removal are associated with higher rates of screw breakage during HWR following PAO. The use of 4.5-mm screws and earlier time to removal (less than 12 months) both decrease the probability of breakage.

How difficult is titanium plate and screw implant removal? A retrospective case series

IntroductionTitanium implants are commonly used for surgical fixation in orthopedic trauma, and have many benefits compared to stainless steel implants. Despite these benefits, some orthopedic surgeons remain hesitant to use titanium implants due to concerns of difficulty with future implant removal, given concerns with cold-welding and screw strippage. The objective of this study was to assess difficulties associated with titanium plate and screw implant removal. MethodsThis is a retrospective case series from a large hospital system. Patients were identified using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 20,680 from 2017 to 2020. Patients were included if they had removal of titanium plate and screws from the upper or lower extremity, were at least18 years of age, and considered skeletally mature. The ease of titanium plate/screw removal was determined by assessing for implant cold-welding, broken screws, stripped screws, and the need for advanced tools (screw removal set, trephine, burr). Results157 patients were identified, with a mean age of 54 years and 59 % female. In total 1274 screws were removed: 14 (1.1 %) were stripped, 8 (0.6 %) were cold-welded, 42 (3.3 %) were loose, and 13 (1.0 %) were broken. 183 plates were removed in total, and 15 (8.2 %) had bone overgrowth that required removal. 12 (7.6 %) procedures were complicated and required the use of advanced tools. Complicated implant removal operations occurred after significantly longer in vivo implant time (mean of 3.7 vs. 1.1 years, p = 0.036), were associated with a younger age, were more likely to occur in lower extremity procedures (p = 0.034), and took significantly longer time for removal (95 vs. 42 min, p < 0.001). ConclusionsDespite concerns with titanium implants, we found a low rate of screw strippage, breakage, and cold welding during the removal process. However, 7.6 % of the 157 surgeries required additional tools other than just a screwdriver, and needed additional operative time. This information allows treating surgeons to plan for implant removal when titanium implants have been used for fixation. Level of evidenceIV

Atypical Versus Typical Subtrochanteric Femoral Fractures: Disparate Patient Profiles, Similar Outcomes.

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate differences in demographic features and clinical outcomes between patients who sustained a typical versus atypical subtrochanteric femoral fracture. We reviewed the records for a cohort of consecutive patients who had undergone operative treatment of a subtrochanteric femoral fracture. Fractures were classified as either "typical" or "atypical" on the basis of the criteria of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR). All patients were treated with a similar surgical algorithm and postoperative protocol. Groups were compared on the basis of demographic features, injury characteristics, operative quality measures, postoperative complications and outcomes, and radiographic time to healing. Comparative analyses were performed to compare the typical and atypical cohorts. Of 220 subtrochanteric fractures, 165 (75.0%) were classified as typical and 55 (25.0%) were classified as atypical. The atypical cohort was predominately female and more likely to have bisphosphonate usage (odds ratio [OR], 7.975; [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.994-15.922]; p < 0.001) and fractures with lower-energy mechanisms (p < 0.001). Patients in the atypical cohort were more likely to be treated with a 10-mm cephalomedullary nail (CMN) (OR, 2.100 [95% CI, 1.119-3.939]; p = 0.020), whereas patients in the typical cohort were treated more frequently with an 11-mm CMN (OR, 0.337 [95% CI, 0.168-0.674]; p = 0.002). There were no differences between the groups in terms of other operative parameters; however, anatomic fracture reduction in neutral lateral alignment was achieved more frequently in the typical cohort (OR, 0.438 [95% CI, 0.220-0.875]; p = 0.018). There were no differences between the groups in terms of hospital quality measures, mortality rates, readmission rates, or complication rates (including implant failure [broken screw or nail] and fracture nonunion) (p = 1.00). Interestingly, there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of time to radiographic healing (260.30 ± 187.97 days in the typical group, compared with 246.40 ± 116.33 days in the atypical group) (OR, 0.999 [95% CI, 0.997-1.002]; p = 0.606). Despite differences in terms of demographic and injury characteristics, patients who sustain a subtrochanteric femur fracture can expect similar outcome profiles regardless of fracture type. Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Epiphyseal-entry cannulated screws for temporary guided growth of the knees: a retrospective review of 89 cases.

Guided growth affects the physis in children to produce a desired effect. Several devices achieve alteration of growth, including staples, plates, and screws. Complications can include device failures, failure to modulate growth as expected, and unintended physeal arrest. We present the results of a unique technique designed to minimize these complications. This was a retrospective review of guided growth at the knee at a single institution utilizing cannulated screws with epiphyseal-entry points. Each case was reviewed to determine the presence of complications related to guided growth, including implant breakage, implant pull-out or pull-through, iatrogenic physeal arrest, failure to modulate growth, and the incidence of revision surgeries. There were 89 patients who had 146 epiphyseal-entry guided growth procedures with a total of 221 4.5 mm cannulated screws. There were no iatrogenic physeal arrests. Five (2.26%) screws in 4 (4.49%) patients had either a broken screw or screw pull-out/pull-through requiring revision procedures. Three patients had osteotomies after skeletal maturity. Four had revision-guided growth for other reasons: 2 due to a lack of timely follow-up, 1 for iatrogenic genu varum without implant failure, and 1 due to recurrent deformity after implant removal. Revision procedures were unanticipated in 6 (6.74%) patients. This study describes a technique for placing cannulated screws at the knee with epiphyseal starting points. Our rate of complications and number of revision surgeries compare favorably with those noted for other techniques. Guided growth using epiphyseal-entry cannulated screws is a safe, effective option for most patients.

Biomechanical evaluation and optimal design of a pedicle screw with double bent rods internal fixation system based on PE-PLIF fusion

Problems, such as broken screws, broken rods, and cage subsidence after clinical spinal fusion surgery affect the success rate of fusion surgery and the fixation effect of fusion segments, and these problems still affect the treatment and postoperative recovery of patients. In this study, we used the biomechanical finite element analysis method to analyze and study the fixation effect of three kinds of spinal internal fixation systems on L4–L5 lumbar spine segments in percutaneous endoscopic posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PE-PLIF). The three different fixation systems compared in this study include bilateral pedicle screw fixation (M1); bilateral pedicle screw with cross-link fixation (M2); bilateral pedicle screws with double bent rods fixation (M3). The internal fixation systems with different structures were analyzed with the help of Hypermesh, and Abaqus. It was found that the internal fixation system with double bent rods reduced screw stresses by 23.8 and 22.2% in right and left axial rotation than the traditional bilateral pedicle screw system, while titanium rod stresses were reduced by 9.6, 3.7, 9.6, and 2.9% in flexion, left and right lateral bending, and right axial rotation, respectively, and L5 upper endplate stresses were reduced by 35.5, 18.9, 38.4, 10.2, and 48.3% in flexion, left and right lateral bending, and left and right axial rotation, respectively. The spinal range of motion (ROM) of the M3 internal fixation system was less than that of the M1 and M2 internal fixation systems in left lateral bending, left lateral rotation, and right axial rotation, and the intact vertebral ROM was reduced by 93.7, 94.9, and 90.9%, respectively. The double bent rod structure of the spinal internal fixation system has better biomechanical properties, which can effectively reduce the risk of screw breakage, loosening, cage subsidence, and endplate collapse after fusion surgery.

Predictors of Hardware Removal in Orthopaedic Trauma Patients Undergoing Syndesmotic Ankle Fixation With Screws.

Indications for removal of syndesmotic screws are not fully elucidated. This study aimed to determine factors related to elective syndesmotic screw removal. Patients who underwent fixation of ankle syndesmotic injuries were included. Screw removal was offered after a minimum of 12 weeks after surgery for pain, stiffness or patient desire to remove painful or broken hardware. Patient demographics, surgical data, distance of the syndesmotic screw from the joint, location of the screw at the physeal scar, and number of syndesmotic screws placed were collected for all patients. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the relationship between patient characteristics and screw removal and independent predictors of hardware removal. Of 160 patients, 60 patients (38%) with an average age of 36.1 (range: 18-84) years underwent elective syndesmotic screw removal at a mean of 7 (range, 3-47) months after initial fixation. The most common reason for screw removal (50/60 patients) was ankle stiffness and pain (83%). Patients who underwent screw removal were more likely to be younger (36.1 years ± 13.0 vs 46.6 years ± 18.2, P < .001) and have a lower ASA score (2 ± 0.8 vs 2.1 ± 0.7, P = .003) by bivariate analysis. Of patients who underwent screw removal, 21.7% (13/60) had a broken screw at the time of removal. Whether the screw was placed at the physeal scar was not significantly associated with patient decision for hardware removal (P = .80). Younger and healthier patients were more likely to undergo elective removal of syndesmotic hardware. Screw distance from joint and screw placement at the physeal scar were not significantly associated with hardware removal. Level III, retrospective cohort study.

CUSTOM-MADE ACETABULAR REVISION ARTHROPLASTY FOR PELVIC DISCONTINUITY CAN RESULT IN STABLE CONSTRUCTS AND SIGNIFICANT IMPROVEMENT IN HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE: A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

Pelvic discontinuity (PD) is a detrimental complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and radiological results of patients with PD who were revised using a custom-made triflange acetabular component (CTAC).This is a single centre prospective study of patients with PD following THA who were treated with a CTAC. The Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), modified Oxford Hip Score (mOHS), EurQol five-dimension three-level (EQ-5D-3L) utility, and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), including visual analogue score (VAS) for pain, were gathered at baseline, and at one- and two-year follow-up. Clinical and radiological complications, including reasons for revisions were registered. Trends over time are described and tested for significance and clinical relevance.18 females with 22 CTACs were included with a mean age of 73.5 years (SD 7.7). There were significant improvements between baseline and final follow-up in HOOS (p&lt;0.01), mOHS (p&lt;0.01), EQ-5D-3L utility (p&lt;0.01), EQ-5D-3L NRS (p&lt;0.01), VAS pain rest (p&lt;0.01), and VAS pain activity (p&lt;0.01). A minimal clinically important improvement in mOHS and the HOOS was observed in 16 patients (73%) and 14 patients (64%), respectively. Definite healing of the PD was observed in 19 hips (86%). Complications included six cases with broken screws (27%), four cases (18%) with bony fractures, and one case (4.5%) with sciatic nerve paresthesia. One patient with concurrent bilateral PD had revision surgery due to recurrent dislocations. No revision surgery was performed for screw failure or implant breakage.This is the first prospective assessment in clinical outcome of patients with PD who were treated with a CTAC. We have demonstrated that CTAC in patients with THA acetabular loosening and PD can result in stable constructs with no mechanical failures. Moreover, clinically relevant improvements in health-related quality of life at two years’ follow-up was observed.

Custom-made acetabular revision arthroplasty for pelvic discontinuity: Can we handle the challenge? : a prospective cohort study.

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and radiological results of patients who were revised using a custom-made triflange acetabular component (CTAC) for component loosening and pelvic discontinuity (PD) after previous total hip arthroplasty (THA). Data were extracted from a single centre prospective database of patients with PD who were treated with a CTAC. Patients were included if they had a follow-up of two years. The Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), modified Oxford Hip Score (mOHS), EurQol EuroQoL five-dimension three-level (EQ-5D-3L) utility, and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), including visual analogue score (VAS) for pain, were gathered at baseline, and at one- and two-year follow-up. Reasons for revision, and radiological and clinical complications were registered. Trends over time are described and tested for significance and clinical relevance. A total of 18 females with 22 CTACs who had a mean age of 73.5 years (SD 7.7) were included. A significant improvement was found in HOOS (p < 0.0001), mOHS (p < 0.0001), EQ-5D-3L utility (p = 0.003), EQ-5D-3L NRS (p = 0.013), VAS pain rest (p = 0.008), and VAS pain activity (p < 0.0001) between baseline and final follow-up. Minimal clinically important improvement in mOHS and the HOOS Physical Function Short Form (HOOS-PS) was observed in 16 patients (73%) and 14 patients (64%), respectively. Definite healing of the PD was observed in 19 hips (86%). Complications included six cases with broken screws (27%), four cases (18%) with bony fractures, and one case (4.5%) with sciatic nerve paresthesia. One patient with concurrent bilateral PD had revision surgery due to recurrent dislocations. No revision surgery was performed for screw failure or implant breakage. CTAC in patients with THA acetabular loosening and PD can result in stable constructs and significant improvement in functioning and health-related quality of life at two years' follow-up. Further follow-up is necessary to determine the mid- to long-term outcome.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open2023;4(2):53-61.

Prevalence and Modes of Posterior Hardware Failure With a Staged Protocol for Circumferential Minimally Invasive Surgical Correction of Adult Spinal Deformity: A 13-Year Experience

One of the common complications of adult spinal deformity (ASD) correction is the failure to relieve pain. This may result from the failure of implanted hardware to provide adequate stabilization. While numerous studies exist, characterizing complications that can occur with minimally invasive correction of ASD and data regarding hardware failure in this setting are limited. This article characterizes the rate and mode of posterior hardware failure in the setting of circumferential minimally invasive surgery (CMIS) for ASD correction. Patients undergoing staged CMIS correction of ASD from January 2007 to September 2018 were identified. Patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included in the study. A total of 263 patients (168 women and 95 men) were included in the study. The mean age of patients was 64 years (21-85, SD 13.7), and the mean length of follow-up was 90 months (24-164, SD 40.2). An average of 6 levels (3-16, SD 3.15) was fused per patient.Eight patients had a mechanical hardware failure and required revision surgery (3.04%). No catastrophic failures were noted in our series. Hardware failures were characterized as follows: 2 patients with broken screws, 5 patients with loose screws, and 1 patient who had symptomatic T12-L1 and L5-S1 nonunion with bilateral distal rod fractures, iliac set screw loosening, and proximal T12 screw loosening. Following revision surgery, all of these patients had confirmed solid fusion on computed tomography (CT) scan at their latest follow-up visit.Interestingly, 3 other patients had loosening of the set screw on their iliac bolts. Five patients had rod fractures between L5 and S1 or below S1. All 8 of these patients were asymptomatic with confirmed fusion at L5-S1 on CT scans. The prevalence of clinically significant hardware failure needing revision in our series was low at 3.04%. Symptomatic hardware prominence requiring revision was 2.3%. Specifically, rod fractures were not common (2.2%). Our study suggests that in the appropriately selected patient, CMIS to correct ASD without osteotomies may result in acceptable rates of hardware failure. Future studies should compare the results of CMIS deformity correction to a matched population of patients undergoing open deformity correction. This study suggests that in the appropriately selected patient, CMIS to correct ASD without osteotomies may result in acceptable rates of hardware failure.

The effect of the sequence of intermediate instrumentation and distraction-reduction of the fractured vertebrae on the surgical treatment of mild to moderate thoracolumbar burst fractures

To investigate the effect of the sequence of intermediate instrumentation with long screws and distraction-reduction on mild to moderate thoracolumbar fractures treated by posterior open and short-segmental fixation. The clinical data of 68 patients with mild to moderate thoracolumbar burst fractures who met the selection criteria between January 2016 and June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into group ISDRF (intermediate screws then distraction-reduction fixation, 32 cases) and group DRISF (distraction-reduction then intermediate screws fixation, 36 cases) according to the different operation methods. There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, gender, body mass index, fracture segment, cause of injury, and preoperative load-sharing classification score, thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score, vertebral canal occupational rate, back pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, anterior height of fractured vertebra, and Cobb angle ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, and fracture healing time were recorded and compared between the two groups. The vertebral canal occupational rate, anterior height of fractured vertebra, kyphosis Cobb angle, and back pain VAS score before and after operation were used to evaluate the effectiveness. There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss and operation time between the two groups ( P>0.05). No vascular or spinal nerve injury and deep infections or skin infections occurred in both groups. At 1 week after operation, the vertebral canal occupational rate in the two groups was significantly improved when compared with that before operation ( P<0.05), no significant difference was found in the difference of vertebral canal occupational rate before and after operation and improvement between the two groups ( P>0.05). The patients in both groups were followed up 18-24 months, with an average of 22.3 months. All vertebral fractures reached bone union at 6 months postoperatively. At last follow-up, there was no internal fixation failures such as broken screws, broken rods or loose screws, but there were 2 cases of mild back pain in the ISDRF group. The intra-group comparison showed that the back pain VAS score, the anterior height of fractured vertebra, and the Cobb angle of the two groups were significantly improved at each time point postoperatively ( P<0.05); the VAS scores at 12 months postoperatively and last follow-up were also improved when compared with that at 1 week postoperatively ( P<0.05). At last follow-up, the anterior height of fractured vertebra in the ISDRF group was significantly lost when compared with that at 1 week and 12 months postoperatively ( P<0.05), the Cobb angle had a significant loss when compared with that at 1 week postoperatively ( P<0.05); the anterior height of fractured vertebra and Cobb angle in DRISF group were not significantly lost when compared with that at 1 week and 12 months postoperatively ( P>0.05). The comparison between groups showed that there was no significant difference in the remission rate of VAS score between the two groups at 1 week postoperatively ( P>0.05), the recovery value of the anterior height of fractured vertebra in ISDRF group was significantly higher than that in DRISF group ( P<0.05), the loss rate at last follow-up was also significantly higher ( P<0.05); the correction rate of Cobb angle in ISDRF group was significantly higher than that in DRISF group at 1 week postoperatively ( P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the loss rate of Cobb angle between the two groups at last follow-up ( P>0.05). In the treatment of mild to moderate thoracolumbar burst fractures with posterior short-segment fixation, the instrumentation of long screws in the injured vertebrae does not affect the reduction of the fracture fragments in the spinal canal. DRISF can better maintain the restored anterior height of the fractured vertebra and reduce the loss of kyphosis Cobb angle during the follow-up, indicating a better long-term effectiveness.

Use of the Locking Attachment Plate for Internal Fixation of Periprosthetic Femur Fractures.

IntroductionThe locking attachment plate (LAP) can be added to a locking compression plate (LCP) to allow the fixation of locking screws bicortically around a femoral implant. We aimed to examine surgical and fracture characteristics associated with healing for periprosthetic femur fractures (PPFFx) treated with constructs employing LAP fixation. We hypothesize that the addition of an LAP provides stable peri-implant fixation.Materials &MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of 28 PPFFx surgically treated with LCP-LAP constructs by 4 surgeons from 2015-2020. Fractures were classified and grouped using the Vancouver Classification System and included 12 B1, 2 B2, 11 C fractures, and 3 fractures around other stemmed implants. Primary outcome measures included hardware failure such as screw pullout, broken screws, and plate fracture. Clinical complications including infection, non-union, malunion, and reoperation were recorded.ResultsNo LAP failures, screw pullout, or broken screws were observed. Two fractured plates (7.1%) occurred in patients with Vancouver C fracture types. Overall complication rate was 17.9% and included 3 non-unions, 1 deep infection, and 1 implant loosening with painful hardware, each requiring reoperation. Differences were observed between unions and nonunions for total number of screws (12.4 vs 14.7, P = .005) and number of locking screws used (8.04 vs 11.3, P = .03).ConclusionThe LAP provides adequate fixation and low failure rates where fixation is required around a well-fixed stem. When failures occur, it is from plate breakage and not due to failure of fixation at the area of plate-stem overlap.

In Vivo Syndesmotic Motion After Rigid and Flexible Fixation Using 4-Dimensional Computerized Tomography.

Maintaining reduction after syndesmotic injury is crucial to patient function; however, malreduction remains common. Flexible suture button fixation may allow more physiologic motion of the syndesmosis compared with rigid screw fixation. Conventional syndesmotic imaging fails to account for physiologic syndesmotic motion with ankle range of motion (ROM), providing misleading results. Four-dimensional computerized tomography (4DCT) can image joints through a dynamic ROM. Our purpose was to compare syndesmotic motion after rigid and flexible fixation using 4DCT. We analyzed 13 patients with syndesmotic injury who were randomized to receive rigid (n = 7) or flexible (n = 6) fixation. Patients underwent bilateral ankle 4DCT while moving between ankle dorsiflexion and plantar flexion. Measures of syndesmotic position and rotation were extracted from 4DCT to determine syndesmotic motion as a function of ankle ROM. Uninjured ankles demonstrated significant decreases in syndesmotic width of 1.0 mm with ankle plantar flexion (SD = 0.6 mm, P < 0.01). Initial rigid fixation demonstrated reduced motion compared with uninjured ankles in 4 of 5 measures (P < 0.01) despite all patients in the rigid fixation group having removed, loose, or broken screws by the time of imaging. Rigid fixation led to less motion than flexible fixation in 3 measures (P = 0.02-0.04). There were no observed differences in syndesmotic position or motion between flexible fixation and uninjured ankles. Despite the loss of fixation in all subjects in the rigid fixation group, initial rigid fixation led to significantly reduced syndesmotic motion. Flexible fixation recreated more physiologic motion compared with rigid fixation and may be used to reduce rates of syndesmotic malreduction. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Hybrid surgery with PEEK rods for lumbar degenerative diseases: a 2-year follow-up study

BackgroundFinite element analyses and biomechanical tests have shown that PEEK rods promote fusion and prevent adjacent segment degeneration. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects and complications of hybrid surgery with PEEK rods in lumbar degenerative diseases.MethodsFrom January 2015-December 2017, 28 patients who underwent lumbar posterior hybrid surgery with PEEK rods were included in the study. The patients were diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation, lumbar spinal stenosis, or degenerative grade I spondylolisthesis. Before the operation and at the last follow-up, the patients completed lumbar anteroposterior and lateral X-ray, dynamic X-ray, MRI examinations. In addition, at the last follow-up the patients also completed lumbar CT examinations. The radiographic parameters, clinical visual analog scale (VAS) score and Oswestry disability index (ODI) score were compared.ResultsThe average age of the patients was 44.8 ± 12.6 years, and the average follow-up duration was 26.4 ± 3.6 months. The VAS score improved from 6.3 ± 1.6 to 1.0 ± 0.9, and the ODI score decreased from 38.4 ± 10.8 to 6.8 ± 4.6. The fusion rate of the fused segment was 100%. There were no significant changes in the modified Pfirrmann classifications or disc height index for the nonfused segments and the upper adjacent segments from pre- to postoperatively. No cases of screw loosening, broken screws, broken rods or other mechanical complications were found.ConclusionHybrid surgery with PEEK rods for lumbar degenerative diseases can yield good clinical results and effectively reduce the incidence of complications such as adjacent segment diseases.

An Oblique Trans-Syndesmotic Screw to Augment Fixation of Distal Fibula Fractures: A Technique Guide

Category:Trauma; AnkleIntroduction/Purpose:A subset of patients with low, transverse fractures of the lateral malleolus are at increased risk of malreduction and late loss of reduction. In patients with poor bone quality and transverse or short oblique fractures at or distal to the tibiotalar joint, distal fixation is often inadequate with a single interfragmentary lag screw. Furthermore, these fractures are susceptible to malreduction by pre-contoured locking plates. To address this, a technique was developed to augment fixation of the distal fragment and decrease the likelihood of loss of reduction. The senior author's technique for this procedure, as well as indications for the technique and a few representative cases, are provided.Methods:This technique involves placement of an oblique tricortical or quadricortical screw from the distal fibula into the tibia in an distal-lateral to proximal-medial direction. The screw is placed either outside of or through the distal-most hole of a one-third tubular plate placed in a neutralization position. The screw trajectory is similar to that of a typical syndesmosis screw in the sagittal plane but is aimed proximally rather than parallel to the tibial plafond. The screw enters the tibia at Chaput's tubercle, just lateral to the joint. The indications for this technique are transverse and short oblique Danis-Weber B distal fibular fractures in which there is inadequate purchase between the plate and the distal fragment. While the purpose of this screw is not to stabilize the syndesmosis, it can be used with other augmentation techniques, such as trans-syndesmotic screws, in high-risk patients with osteoporosis and/or neuropathy.Results:This technique has been used for many years by the senior author. There have been no implant failures (e.g. broken screws) or major complications associated with this technique. Three representative cases demonstrate appropriate indications and outcomes for this technique. These include patients with significant neuropathy or osteoporosis who present with a particularly troublesome fracture pattern (transverse fibular fracture at or below the level of the tibiotalar joint). This screw, along with any other syndesmotic screws, is removed at 3-4 months according to the senior author's protocol.Conclusion:A distal oblique trans-syndesmotic screw can be used to supplement current fibular fracture fixation constructs. It is easy to place under fluoroscopic guidance and generally is removed after fracture union, similar to standard syndesmosis screws. The use of this screw helps prevent the malreduction that can potentially occur when treating transverse or short-oblique Weber B distal fibular fractures with a locking plate. In our series of patients at a large urban tertiary referral center, this technique has produced good outcomes with no reportable complications.

Efficacy of PRECICE Nail in Treatment of Adult Patients With Posttraumatic Femoral Leg Length Discrepancy

Posttraumatic, limb length discrepancy in adults is a challenge to treat, and multiple treatment protocols over the years have shown varying levels of success and complications. Before the introduction of the PRECICE nail in 2011, our preferred method of limb lengthening used an Ilizarov or Taylor Spatial frame. To assess the PRECICE nail, we evaluated the accuracy and complications during treatment in a series of skeletally mature patients with posttraumatic femoral limb length discrepancy. The surgical technique along with a case series of 8 patients are described in detail. On average, the target lengthening for the PRECICE nail was 44 mm, and all patients achieved lengthening within 2 mm and complete bony consolidation. The only observed complication in our series was a broken screw 1 year after the patient started weight-bearing. The PRECICE nail demonstrated promising results and was useful for bone regeneration and consolidation without the need for additional procedures. The rate of complications was low compared with previous methods, making this device an excellent treatment option.

Growth modulation may decrease recurrence when used as an adjunct to osteotomy in infantile Blount’s disease

BackgroundThis study aimed to determine whether the addition of a lateral proximal tibial tension band plate, combined with proximal tibial dome realignment osteotomy, would decrease the recurrence rate in a group of children younger than 7 years with infantile Blount’s disease (IBD) and high recurrence risk, defined as a medial physeal slope ≥60°. MethodsWe reviewed the records of 14 children (22 limbs) under the age of 7 years with IBD and a medial physeal slope ≥60° that were treated with a combination of tibial osteotomy and tension band plates (group 2) to determine the recurrence rate and time to reoperation. These results were compared with a matched group of eight children (12 limbs) with IBD and a medial physeal slope≥60° that were treated previously with tibial osteotomy alone (group 1). ResultsThe two groups were matched in terms of age, sex, obesity, Langenskiold stage, tibio-femoral angle and medial physeal slope. The recurrence rate was 92% (11/12) in group 1 and 77% (17/22) in group 2 (odds ratio 0.31; 95% CI 0.03–3.01, p=0.312). The mean time to reoperation was 2.4 years in group 1 and 1.9 years in group 2 (p=0.319). There were two implant-related complications: one broken screw and one case of epiphyseal fixation failure in the tension band plate group, both in cases of recurrence. ConclusionThe addition of a lateral tension band plate to a proximal tibial realignment osteotomy may be an option to consider in children younger than 7 years with IBD and a high risk of recurrence. Further research is required to determine recurrence risk in IBD and to develop and evaluate surgical strategies to mitigate this risk with well-designed, multicentre controlled trials. Level of evidence: Level 4

Removal of cement-augmented screws in distal femoral fractures and the effect of retained screws and cement on total knee arthroplasty: a biomechanical investigation

BackgroundGiven the increasing number of osteoporotic fractures of the distal femur, screw augmentation with bone cement is an option to enhance implant anchorage. However, in implant removal or revision surgeries, the cement cannot be removed from the distal femur without an extended surgical procedure. Therefore, the aims of this study were to investigate (1) whether cement augmentation has any influence on screw removal and removal torque, and (2) whether the implantation of a femoral component of a knee arthroplasty and its initial interface stability are affected by the remaining screws/cement.Material and methodsEight pairs of fresh-frozen human female cadaveric distal femurs (mean age, 86 years) with a simulated AO/OTA 33 A3 fracture were randomized in paired fashion to two groups and fixed with a distal femoral locking plate using cannulated perforated locking screws. Screw augmentation with bone cement was performed in one of the groups, while the other group received no screw augmentation. Following biomechanical testing until failure (results published separately), the screws were removed and the removal torque was measured. A femoral component of a knee arthroplasty was then implanted, and pull-out tests were performed after cement curing. Interference from broken screws/cement was assessed, and the maximum pull-out force was measured.ResultsThe mean screw removal torque was not significantly different between the augmented (4.9 Nm, SD 0.9) and nonaugmented (4.6 Nm, SD 1.3, p = 0.65) screw groups. However, there were significantly more broken screws in in the augmented screw group (17 versus 9; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the pull-out force of the femoral component between the augmented (2625 N, SD 603) and nonaugmented (2653 N, SD 542, p = 0.94) screw groups.ConclusionThe screw removal torque during implant removal surgery does not significantly differ between augmented and nonaugmented screws. In the augmented screw group, significantly more screws failed. To overcome this, the use of solid screws in holes B, C, and G can be considered. Additionally, it is possible to implant a femoral component for knee arthroplasty that retains the initial anchorage and does not suffer from interference with broken screws and/or residual cement.Level of Evidence 5

Development of a Computer-Aided Design and Finite Element Analysis Combined Method for Affordable Spine Surgical Navigation With 3D-Printed Customized Template.

Introduction: Revision surgery of a previous lumbosacral non-union is highly challenging, especially in case of complications, such as a broken screw at the first sacral level (S1). Here, we propose the implementation of a new method based on the CT scan of a clinical case using 3D reconstruction, combined with finite element analysis (FEA), computer-assisted design (CAD), and 3D-printing technology to provide accurate surgical navigation to aid the surgeon in performing the optimal surgical technique by inserting a pedicle screw at the S1 level.Materials and Methods: A step-by-step approach was developed and performed as follows: (1) Quantitative CT based patient-specific FE model of the sacrum was created. (2) The CAD model of the pedicle screw was inserted into the sacrum model in a bicortical convergent and a monocortical divergent position, by overcoming the geometrical difficulty caused by the broken screw. (3) Static FEAs (Abaqus, Dassault Systemes) were performed using 500 N tensile load applied to the screw head. (4) A template with two screw guiding structures for the sacrum was designed and manufactured using CAD design and 3D-printing technologies, and investment casting. (5) The proposed surgical technique was performed on the patient-specific physical model created with the FDM printing technology. The patient-specific model was CT scanned and a comparison with the virtual plan was performed to evaluate the template accuracyResults: FEA results proved that the modified bicortical convergent insertion is stiffer (6,617.23 N/mm) compared to monocortical divergent placement (2,989.07 N/mm). The final template was created via investment casting from cobalt-chrome. The template design concept was shown to be accurate (grade A, Gertzbein-Robbins scale) based on the comparison of the simulated surgery using the patient-specific physical model and the 3D virtual surgical plan.Conclusion: Compared to the conventional surgical navigation techniques, the presented method allows the consideration of the patient-specific biomechanical parameters; is more affordable, and the intraoperative X-ray exposure can be reduced. This new patient- and condition-specific approach may be widely used in revision spine surgeries or in challenging primary cases after its further clinical validation.

Fretting Corrosion, Third-Body Polyethylene Damage, and Cup Positioning in Primary vs Revision Dual Mobility Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundDual mobility (DM) articulations were introduced for total hip arthroplasty to reduce the risk of instability for patients who have a high risk of dislocation. The use of DM constructs in both primary and revision total hip arthroplasty has been steadily increasing, leading to concerns regarding potential risks of fretting corrosion, polyethylene wear, metal release, and failure due to component positioning. MethodsA total of 56 retrieved DM constructs were collected. The inner and outer polyethylene liner surfaces were assessed for 7 damage mechanisms, and fretting corrosion was evaluated for the femoral stem, head, and modular liner. Three polyethylene liners with the greatest amounts of embedded debris were examined using scanning electron microscopy. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy was used to determine the elemental content of the debris. Acetabular cup orientation was analyzed radiographically using the EBRA (Einzel-Bild-Roentgen-Analyse) method. ResultsThe devices were revised most frequently for infection (36%), loosening (21%), and instability/dislocation (18%). The most common polyethylene damage mechanisms were scratching, pitting, burnishing, and embedded debris, and no difference in total damage was found between primary and revision cases. Scanning electron microscopy/energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy revealed that debris morphology and composition were consistent with porous titanium coating, resulting from cup loosening or broken screws and augments. A total of 71% and 50% of the constructs were determined to be within the Lewinnek safe zone for inclination and anteversion, respectively. ConclusionThe most notable mechanisms of surface damage were due to third-body debris, especially for the polyethylene surfaces which articulate against cobalt-chromium femoral heads and acetabular liners. Scratching of the femoral head and the metal liner from this debris may support the clinical use of ceramic for DM bearing surfaces in the future.

The LISFRANC JUT: A physical finding of subtle LISFRANC injuries.

Low-energy Lisfranc injuries are uncommon and are often misdiagnosed as sprains. This results in a delay for the definitive treatment. The aim of this study is to discuss the physical finding of a midfoot "jut," that can be used to help diagnose subtle Lisfranc injuries, in patients who present with persistent midfoot pain after low-energy trauma. Between January 2015 through December 2019, patients previously diagnosed with a sprain, who were at least six weeks after their original injury, and presented with midfoot pain, were identified. All had a bony prominence on the medial border of the first tarsometatarsal joint, defined as a "jut", which produced pain. Standing radiographs demonstrated subluxation of the tarsometatarsal joint(s). Seven patients (5 females/2 males) presented as isolated injuries, with a mean age of 40.4 years. Mechanisms of injury were five falls, one from a sporting event, and one twisting injury. Time to diagnosis, from their date of injury, averaged 9.9 weeks. All underwent fixation. Follow-up averaged 13.7 months. At final follow-up none of the patients developed surgical site infections, wound dehiscence, loosening of implants, loss of reductions or a recurrence of the "jut". None of the patients demonstrated arthrosis and only one patient had a broken screw and declined further surgical intervention. Patients presenting with a history of low-energy trauma, a diagnosis of sprain, continued complaint of foot pain, and a "jut" on the medial border of the midfoot, should be evaluated for a subtle Lisfranc injury.