Bristol Stool Form Scale Score Research Articles

Efficacy and safety of elobixibat in combination with or switched from conventional treatments of chronic constipation: A retrospective observational study.

Elobixibat is a triple mode of action laxative that increases water secretion into the colon, promotes colonic motility, and reestablishes the defecation desire. This study aims to evaluate the effectivity and safety of elobixibat in chronic constipation (CC) patients refractory to conventional laxatives. A single-center retrospective observational study was conducted in refractory CC patients diagnosed according to the Rome IV criteria and received elobixibat between April 2018 and June 2022 at Osaka Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital. Data were collected for spontaneous bowel movement (SBM), Bristol stool form scale (BSFS) scores, abdominal symptoms, and adverse events. Eligible 311 patients were selected for the analysis. Two-week Elobixibat treatment significantly increased SBM (times/week) from 2.9 ± 1.9 to 4.3 ± 1.9 (P < 0.0001). The BSFS score improved significantly from 3.2 ± 1.7 to 4.4 ± 1.4 (P < 0.0001). The percentages of patients with hard stool were decrease and that with normal stools were increase. Improvements in abdominal symptoms (sensation of incomplete bowel evacuation, straining, abdominal pain and distention, and difficulty defecating) were also significant (P < 0.05). These constipation symptoms were improved irrespective of patient characteristics or previous laxatives. The 43.9% of previous laxatives were discontinued at the start of or after starting elobixibat treatment. A few adverse events were observed, elobixibat was well tolerated. Elobixibat was effective in patients who were refractory to other laxatives, irrespective of previous therapy or patient characteristics. Elobixibat may contribute to resolving polypharmacy with single mode of action laxatives.

Factors Associated with Defecation Satisfaction among Japanese Adults with Chronic Constipation.

Background: Constipation causes substantial morbidity worldwide. Methods: This survey assessed constipation-related factors in Japan using the Japanese version of the Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life (IBS-QOL-J) instrument. We also examined the relationship among laxative type, Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) scores, and treatment cost. Finally, we examined differences in satisfaction scores according to laxative type, treatment type, treatment cost, and BSFS score. Results: IBS-QOL-J was higher among those taking salt and/or irritation laxatives. Those paying >JPY 5000 (USD 50.00) had the lowest IBS-QOL-J. IBS-QOL-J was significantly lower among those with a BSFS score of 1 or 2 (severe constipation). Conclusions: This study's findings suggest that a variety of factors, including treatment type and cost, are associated with defecation satisfaction. Those who had hard stools, used multiple laxatives, or spent more on treatment were less satisfied. Future strategies should target therapies that do not require multiple laxatives with lower treatment costs. Adequate defecation with a small number of appropriate laxatives at minimal cost appears to improve defecation satisfaction. It is desirable to identify appropriate laxatives and improve dietary habits and exercise routines. It is also necessary to stop blindly increasing laxative usage and properly diagnose constipation disorders such as anatomical abnormalities other than functional constipation.

Clinical effects of chemical drugs, fecal microbiota transplantation, probiotics, dietary fiber, and acupuncture in the treatment of chronic functional constipation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Currently, there are increasingly diverse treatment modalities for chronic functional constipation (CFC). This study aims to compare the relative efficacy and safety of chemical drugs, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), probiotics, dietary fiber, and acupuncture in the treatment of patients with CFC. We searched relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in five databases up to November 2023. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was carried out using R Studio 4.2.1. Cumulative ranking probability plots, assessed through the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA), were employed to rank the included drugs for various outcome measures. We included a total of 45 RCT studies with 17 118 patients with CFC. From the SUCRA values and NMA results FMT showed the best utility in terms of clinical efficacy, Bristol stool form scale scores, patient assessment of constipation quality of life scores, and the treatment modality with the lowest ranked incidence of adverse effects was electroacupuncture. Subgroup analysis of the chemotherapy group showed that sodium A subgroup analysis of the chemical group showed that sodium picosulfate 10 mg had the highest clinical efficacy. FMT is more promising in the treatment of CFC and may be more effective in combination with the relatively safe treatment of acupuncture.

Efficacy of washed microbiota transplantation for therapeutic targets of refractory functional constipation and the influencing factors: a single-center, retrospective, 24-week follow-up study

BackgroundThe efficacy of washed microbiota transplantation (WMT) in terms of refractory functional constipation (FC)-related therapeutic targets and influencing factors have not been elucidated. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and influencing factors of WMT in treating refractory FC-related therapeutic targets.MethodsThe clinical data of patients diagnosed with refractory FC and received with WMT were retrospectively collected. The therapeutic targets included straining, hard stools, incomplete evacuation, a sense of anorectal obstruction, manual maneuvers, and decreased stool frequency. Each target was recorded as 1 (yes) or 0 (no). All patients were followed up for approximately 24 weeks from the end of the first course of WMT. The primary outcomes were the improvement rates for the individual therapeutic targets and the overall response in respect of the therapeutic targets decreased by 2 at weeks 4, 8, and 24. The secondary outcomes were the clinical remission rate (i.e., the proportion of patients with an average of 3 or more spontaneous complete bowel movements per week), clinical improvement rate (i.e., the proportion of patients with an average increase of 1 or more SCBMs/week or patients with remission), stool frequency, Wexner constipation score, Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) score, and adverse events. The factors influencing the efficacy were also analyzed.ResultsOverall, 63 patients with 112 WMT courses were enrolled. The improvement rates at weeks 8 and 24 were 45.6% and 35.0%, 42.9% and 38.6%, 45.0% and 35.7%, 55.6% and 44.4%, and 60.9% and 50.0%, respectively, for straining, hard stools, incomplete evacuation, a sense of anorectal obstruction, and decreased stool frequency. The overall response rates were 49.2%, 50.8%, and 42.9%, respectively, at weeks 4, 8, and 24. The rates of clinical remission and clinical improvement were 54.0% and 68.3%, respectively, at weeks 4. The stool frequency, BSFS score, and Wexner constipation score tended to improve post-WMT. Only 22 mild adverse events were observed during the 112 WMT courses and the follow-up. The number of WMT courses was identified to be the independent factor influencing the efficacy.ConclusionsWMT is efficacious in improving refractory FC-related therapeutic targets. The effectiveness of WMT in the management of FC is enhanced with the administration of multiple courses.

Effects of Teduglutide on Diarrhea in Pediatric Patients with Short Bowel Syndrome-Associated Intestinal Failure.

This post-hoc analysis evaluated the effect of teduglutide treatment on diarrhea in patients with short bowel syndrome-associated intestinal failure (SBS-IF). Data from 2 open-label, multicenter, phase 3 pediatric SBS-IF clinical trials of teduglutide (NCT01952080 and NCT02682381) were pooled where possible. The primary objective was to evaluate the change in stool consistency, frequency, and volume from baseline to weeks 12 and 24 of treatment in patients who received any teduglutide dose from both studies ("total teduglutide"). Safety assessments included gastrointestinal adverse event reporting. Overall, 101 patients were analyzed. Among the total teduglutide group (n = 87), there were significant changes from baseline to weeks 12 and 24 in mean (standard error) Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) score [-1.8 (0.26; P < 0.0001) and -2.2 (0.27; P < 0.0001), respectively], parenteral nutrition and/or intravenous fluid (PN/IV) volume [-16.9 (1.7; P < 0.0001) and -20.1 (2.3; P < 0.0001) mL/kg/day, respectively], and enteral nutrition volume [9.2 (1.7; P < 0.0001) and 9.6 (2.3; P = 0.0002) mL/kg/day, respectively]. Among patients in the standard of care group (n = 14) there were numerical changes in BSFS score, and enteral nutrition volume at weeks 12 and 24; significant changes in PN/IV volume [-6.9 (1.5) mL/kg/day; P = 0.0041] were observed at 24 weeks, but not at 12 weeks. In this post-hoc analysis, short-term treatment with teduglutide was associated with improved stool consistency, as well as trends towards reductions in PN/IV requirements and advancements in enteral nutrition volume in children with SBS-IF. Further research assessing the impact of patient-level factors on stool characteristics when using teduglutide is warranted.

Effectiveness and safety of lubiprostone after switching from stimulant laxatives in elderly patients with chronic constipation.

Stimulant laxatives may cause electrolyte abnormalities, dehydration, and abdominal pain; their long-term use can lead to tolerance and subsequent refractory constipation. We investigated the effectiveness, safety, and quality of life after switching from stimulant laxatives to lubiprostone in elderly patients with chronic constipation (CC). This multicenter, interventional, open-label, single-arm, before-and-after comparison study enrolled 99 Japanese patients aged 65-90 years with CC who took stimulant laxatives for ≥2 weeks prior to switching to lubiprostone monotherapy. The mean ± SD spontaneous defecations at Week 1 of 7.8 ± 6.2 times/week was not significantly different from that at baseline (8.3 ± 4.7). Spontaneous defecations were significantly reduced at Weeks 2 (-1.5 ± 4.0, P < 0.001) and 4 (-1.5 ± 3.7, P < 0.001). The Bristol Stool Form Scale score did not change from baseline (4.7 ± 0.9) at Weeks 1 (4.5 ± 1.3) or 4 (4.3 ± 1.3), but it did at Week 2 (4.3 ± 1.5, P < 0.05). The Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life questionnaire score increased (0.36 ± 0.07, P < 0.001) after 28 days. Nausea was the only symptom that worsened from baseline and was the most frequently reported adverse drug reaction (15.2%). Switching to lubiprostone monotherapy for CC was not associated with significant concerns in short-term spontaneous defecation frequency and safety, but it might affect the efficacy and patient quality of life over 2 weeks. Careful treatment strategies facilitating gradual switching to lubiprostone monotherapy may be needed in patients using stimulant laxatives.

Pelvic floor muscle exercises alleviate symptoms and improve mental health and rectal function in patients with low anterior resection syndrome.

Pelvic floor rehabilitation has been reported to be effective in improving fecal incontinence. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of combined pelvic floor muscle exercises (PFMEs) and loperamide treatment on rectal function and mental health for low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) patients after sphincter-saving operation (SSO) for rectal cancer. A total of 60 inpatients diagnosed with LARS were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of two groups: patients in Group A (n = 30) were treated with a PFME intervention and those in Group B (n = 30) with a control intervention for 4 weeks. High-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) was performed for all LARS patients. Demographic information was collected for all patients, and they subsequently also completed several questionnaires, including the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), a measure of Wexner score, a measure of stool frequency per day, and the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). No significant differences between the groups were observed in baseline data. With regard to rectal function, we found significant improvements at week 4 in maximal resting pressure (MRP) (39.93 ± 5.02 vs. 28.70 ± 5.40 mmH2O, p < 0.001) and maximal squeeze pressure (MSP) (132.43 ± 8.16 mmH2O vs. 113.33 ± 9.87 mmH2O, p < 0.001) among Group A patients compared to Group B patients. Additionally, Wexner scores were significantly lower in Group A than in Group B at week 4 (8.10 ± 1.24 vs. 9.87 ± 1.29ml, p = 0.018), as were stool frequency (6.47 ± 0.90 vs. 7.83 ± 0.93, p < 0.001) and BSFS scores (5.17 ± 0.65 vs. 6.10 ± 0.80, p = 0.020). Notably, HADS scores were also significantly lower in Group A than in Group B at week 4 (8.25 ± 2.36 vs. 10.48 ± 3.01, p < 0.001). Additionally, both anxiety scores (4.16 ± 1.38 vs. 5.33 ± 1.69, p < 0.001) and depression scores (4.09 ± 1.56 vs. 5.15 ± 1.89, p < 0.001) were significantly lower in Group A than in Group B at week 4. Pelvic floor muscle exercises are an effective treatment that can alleviate symptoms and improve rectal function and mental health in patients with low anterior resection syndrome.

Insights from Bacterial 16S rRNA Gene into Bacterial Genera and Predicted Metabolic Pathways Associated with Stool Consistency in Rectal Cancer Patients: A Proof of Concept.

To examine if gut microbial taxa abundances and predicted functional pathways correlate with Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) classification at the end of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CRT) for rectal cancer. Rectal cancer patients (n = 39) provided stool samples for 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Stool consistency was evaluated using the BSFS. Gut microbiome data were analyzed using QIIME2. Correlation analysis were performed in R. At the genus level, Staphylococcus positively correlates (Spearman's rho = 0.26), while Anaerofustis, Roseburia, Peptostreptococcaceae unclassified, Ruminococcaceae UBA1819, Shuttleworthia, Ca. Soleaferrea, Anaerostignum, Oscillibacter, and Akkermansia negatively correlate with BSFS scores (Spearman's rho -0.20 to -0.42). Predicted pathways, including mycothiol biosynthesis and sucrose degradation III (sucrose invertase), were positively correlated with BSFS (Spearman's rho = 0.03-0.21). The data support that in rectal cancer patients, stool consistency is an important factor to include in microbiome studies. Loose/liquid stools may be linked to Staphylococcus abundance and to mycothiol biosynthesis and sucrose degradation pathways.

S524 Predictors of Placebo Response in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Constipation: A Post-Hoc Analysis From Pooled Phase 2b/3 Studies Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Linaclotide

Introduction: In clinical studies of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), the placebo response rate is variable, with a pooled placebo response rate of 34% for the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) abdominal pain responder endpoint.1 Further understanding of the factors that drive the placebo response can improve clinical study design. We aim to identify potential factors associated with a high placebo response via a post-hoc analysis of clinical studies in IBS patients with constipation (IBS-C). Methods: Patient data from placebo-controlled studies that assessed the efficacy and safety of linaclotide for IBS-C were pooled from 1 phase 2b (NCT02559206) and 3 phase 3 (NCT00948818, NCT00938717, NCT03573908) studies. Inclusion criteria were similar across studies, and all patients had a baseline abdominal pain severity score ≥3 (0–10 scale). The primary endpoint of interest was abdominal pain responder, defined as ≥30% improvement from a 2-week baseline in average daily worst abdominal pain score for ≥50% of the first 12 weeks on treatment. Predictors of placebo response were identified using backwards selection via a regression analysis from a list of demographics and baseline disease characteristics. Additionally, standardized coefficients were calculated to rank the magnitude of association of each selected predictor with the response. Results: The 4 studies included 2073 patients (1027 placebo and 1046 linaclotide 290 μg). Two predictors of placebo response were identified as having the largest impact on the FDA abdominal pain responder endpoint. Higher baseline variation in abdominal pain was associated with higher placebo response (coefficient, standard error [SE]: 0.20, 0.068; P = .0032), and higher mean baseline abdominal pain was associated with lower placebo response (coefficient, SE: −0.15, 0.019; P < .0001) [Table]. Age, sex, baseline spontaneous bowel movement frequency, baseline Bristol Stool Form Scale score, anxiety, depression, and prior gastrointestinal drugs taken were not found to impact the placebo response for the abdominal pain responder endpoint. Conclusion: In this pooled analysis of IBS-C clinical studies, higher baseline variation in abdominal pain was a positive predictor of placebo response, while higher mean baseline abdominal pain score was a negative predictor of placebo response. These findings may have implications towards future clinical study design. Table 1. - Factors that predict placebo response for abdominal pain improvement, pooled data from phase 2b/3 studies Predictor Placebo (n = 1046) Estimated coefficient (SE) P value SC SD of baseline abdominal pain 0.20 (0.068) .0032 0.08 Mean baseline pain −0.15 (0.019) < .0001 −0.14 A responder was defined as ≥30% improvement in average daily worst abdominal pain score from baseline for 50% of weeks on treatment. Predictors assessed were age, sex, baseline spontaneous bowel movement, mean baseline abdominal pain score, SD of baseline abdominal pain score, pre-US Food and Drug Administration approval, baseline Bristol Stool Form Scale score, anxiety, depression, baseline pain conditions, prior gastrointestinal drug taken. SC, standardized coefficient; SD, standard deviation; SE, standard error.

Long-term outcomes of 328 patients with of autism spectrum disorder after fecal microbiota transplantation

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in the treatment of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Methods: A longitudinal study was conducted. Clinical data from ASD patients with gastrointestinal symptoms and who underwent FMT in the Tenth People's Hospital affiliated to Tongji University or Jinling Hospital between May 2012 to May 2021 were retrospectively collected. Scores derived from the autism behavior checklist (ABC), the childhood autism rating scale (CARS), the Bristol stool form scale (BSFS), and the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS) were analyzed at baseline and at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th, 24th, 36th, 48th and 60th month after FMT. Records of any adverse reactions were collected. Generalized estimating equations were used for analysis of data on time points before and after FMT. Results: A total of 328 patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. Their mean age was 6.1±3.4 years old. The cohort included 271 boys and 57 girls. The percentage of patients remaining in the study for post-treatment follow-up at the 1st, 3rd, 12th, 24th, 36th, 48th and 60th month were as follows: 303 (92.4%), 284 (86.7%), 213 (64.9%), 190 (57.9%), 143 (43.6%), 79 (24.1%), 46 (14.0%), 31 (9.5%). After FMT, the average ABC score was significantly improved in the first 36 months and remained improved at the 48th month. However, the average score was not significantly different from baseline by the 60th month (1st-36th month, P<0.001; 48th month, P=0.008; 60th month, P=0.108). The average CARS score improved significantly during the first 48 months and remained improved at the 60th month (1st-48th month, P<0.001; 60th month, P=0.010). The average BSFS score was also significantly improved in the first 36 months (with an accompanying stool morphology that resembled type 4). This improvement was maintained at the 48th month. However, the average score was similar to baseline at the 60th month (1st-36th month, P<0.001; 48th month, P=0.008; 60th month, P=0.109). The average GSRS score was significantly improved during the first 24 months, but not afterwards (1st-24th month, P<0.001; 36th month, P=0.209; 48th month, P=0.996; 60th month, P=0.668). The adverse events recorded during treatment included abdominal distension in 21 cases (6.4%), nausea in 14 cases (4.3%), vomiting in 9 cases (2.7%), abdominal pain in 15 cases (4.6%), diarrhea in 18 cases (5.5%), fever in 13 cases (4.0%), and excitement in 24 cases (7.3%). All adverse reactions were mild to moderate and improved immediately after suspension of FMT or on treatment of symptoms. No serious adverse reactions occurred. Conclusion: FMT has satisfactory long-term efficacy and safety for the treatment of ASD with gastrointestinal symptoms.

Association between bile area in the duodenal bulb and abdominal symptoms: Quantitative analysis using blue laser imaging.

Bile acids are strongly associated with the pathogenesis of functional gastrointestinal diseases. In recent years, blue laser imaging (BLI) endoscopy has emerged as a novel image-enhanced endoscopic method, which illustrates bile as a reddish hue. The present study investigated the factors that affect the area of bile in duodenal bulbs using BLI. For this purpose, patients (356 cases) who underwent upper endoscopy with BLI between April, 2017 and December, 2019, and completed patient background and symptom questionnaires [Constipation Scoring System (CSS), Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) and Frequency Scale for Symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (FSSG)], were retrospectively investigated. Each BLI bile score was calculated as a percentage of bile area in a field of view in the duodenal bulb using a KS400 image analysis system, and the association with abdominal symptoms was examined using multiple regression analysis. The patient characteristics included the following: Age (in years), 69.9±11.3; male/female ratio, 146/210; body mass index, 23.0±3.8; reflux esophagitis (M/A/B/C), 143/19/3/3; atrophic gastritis (C-0/C1-3/O1-3), 132/100/124; proton pump inhibitor potassium competitive acid blocker/aspirin/ursodeoxycholic acid/gall bladder stones/cholecystectomy, 105/27/18/43/18; BLI bile score, 7.10 (±14.34); CSS score, 3.55 (±3.80); BSFS score, 3.91 (±1.02); and FSSG score, 4.80 (±5.76). Correlation coefficients (P<0.05) for the BLI bile score were found for cholecystectomy (Rho=0.137) and aspirin use (Rho=0.118). In multiple regression analysis, independent predictors of the BLI bile score were cholecystectomy [standardized partial regression coefficient (β)=0.169, P=0.001] and the BSFS score (β=0.107, P=0.042). On the whole, the present study demonstrates that the duodenal bile area in BLI upper endoscopy is associated with cholecystectomy and fecal characteristics.

The insoluble excretion of multi-matrix system mesalazine preparations in patients with ulcerative colitis

BackgroundMulti-matrix mesalazine (MMX) is an important treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC); however, it is often excreted intact, which increases the risk of relapse. This study aimed to clarify the risk factors for insoluble MMX excretion.MethodsThe subjects were 102 UC patients who were newly prescribed MMX alone to induce remission. Their stools were evaluated on the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS), the presence/absence of insoluble MMX excretion was investigated in interviews, and defecation frequency at the start of treatment and disease type were retrospectively investigated by examining their medical records.ResultsThe insoluble excretion rate (IER) was 14.7%. It tended to be higher in the patients with left-sided colitis or extensive colitis, although the differences among the disease types were not significant (p = 0.053). The mean defecation frequency of the patients that reported insoluble MMX excretion was significantly higher than that of the patients that did not report it (6.27 ± 5.28 vs. 3.69 ± 3.17, p < 0.05). The IER tended to be higher among the patients with soft stools (4.5%, 21.9%, and 23.1% in those with BSFS scores of ≤ 4, 5, and ≥ 6, respectively). In ROC analysis of defecation frequency, ≥ 3.5 defecations was found to exhibit sensitivity and specificity of 66.7% and 65.5%, respectively, for predicting insoluble MMX excretion.ConclusionsThe likelihood of insoluble MMX excretion is influenced by defecation frequency and the extent of inflammation. It is important to keep the possibility of insoluble excretion in mind when prescribing MMX.

Analysis of the impact on efficacy of lubiprostone dose reduction to manage adverse events in the treatment of chronic constipation in Japan

Objective To compare outcomes between two doses of lubiprostone in patients with chronic constipation (CC), to assess whether dose reduction affects efficacy. Methods This open-label exploratory study involved 146 patients with CC treated initially with lubiprostone 24 mcg twice daily for a planned duration of 4 weeks. Patients who experienced adverse events (AEs) had their dose reduced to 12 mcg twice daily (for 4 weeks). Results Lubiprostone dose was unchanged in 104 patients and reduced due to AEs in 42 patients. Significant differences in the mean number of bowel movements per week favored the dose-reduced group at Week 1 and end of follow-up. No between-group differences were observed over time for mean number of days per week with bowel movements or mean Bristol Stool Form Scale scores. Symptoms of abdominal bloating, strained defecation, and sensation of incomplete evacuation improved in both groups. Before dose reduction, nausea was reported by 64.3% and diarrhea by 45.2% of patients in the dose-reduced group; after dose reduction, no patients reported nausea and one patient reported diarrhea. Conclusion Dose reduction of lubiprostone reduced the incidence of AEs, with no compromise to efficacy, and may be a suitable approach for patients who develop AEs during treatment.

Safety and Efficacy of Elobixibat, an Ileal Bile Acid Transporter Inhibitor, in Elderly Patients With Chronic Idiopathic Constipation According to Administration Time: Interim Analysis of Post-marketing Surveillance.

Background/AimsElobixibat, an ileal bile acid transporter (apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter) inhibitor, was recently launched in Japan for the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation. We conducted an interim analysis of post-marketing surveillance to evaluate the safety and efficacy of elobixibat in elderly patients with chronic constipation and compared the efficacy according to administration time.MethodsSafety and efficacy outcomes were evaluated through patient interviews for 4 weeks.ResultsAdverse drug reactions (ADRs) were observed in 5.24% of the 1049 patients analyzed; diarrhea (2.19%) and abdominal pain (1.81%) were the most common. A serious ADR of death was reported in one patient (0.10%). The incidence of ADRs in the ≥ 65-year old or ≥ 75-year-old subpopulation was similar to that in the total patient population. Mean bowel movements per week significantly increased from 2.9 ± 2.5 at baseline to 5.0 ± 3.1 (P < 0.001) at Week 2 and 5.3 ± 2.6 (P < 0.001) at Week 4. The mean Bristol Stool Form Scale score significantly increased from 2.3 ± 1.4 at baseline to 3.8 ± 1.3 (P < 0.001) at Week 2 and 3.9 ± 1.1 at Week 4 (P < 0.001). Bowel movements significantly increased in the elderly population and subpopulations receiving elobixibat before breakfast, lunch, or dinner. The median time to bowel movement was 5 hours.ConclusionThe results suggested that elobixibat was well-tolerated and efficacious in elderly patients with chronic constipation and can be administered before any meals.

Effects of Electroacupuncture on Opioid-Induced Constipation in Patients With Cancer: Study Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

BackgroundOpioid-induced constipation (OIC) is one of the most prevalent adverse events associated with cancer patients who receive opioid analgesics for moderate to severe pain. Acupuncture may be an effective treatment for OIC. We designed this trial to assess the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture for OIC in cancer patients.MethodsThis is a multicenter, sham-controlled, parallel-group, subject- and assessor-blinded randomized trial. A total of 100 cancer patients with OIC will be randomly assigned to either the electroacupuncture group or the sham electroacupuncture group at a ratio of 1:1. Patients in each group will receive a total of 24-session treatment over 8 weeks, three sessions a week and 30 min each session. Thereafter, patients will be followed up for another 8 weeks. The primary outcome will be the proportion of responders, defined as a patient who has ≥3 spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs)/wk and ≥ increase of 1 SBM from baseline simultaneously for at least 6 out of 8 weeks of the treatment period. The secondary outcomes will include the mean weekly SBMs and complete spontaneous bowel movements, the mean Bristol Stool Form Scale score for stool consistency, the mean score for straining of SBM, the total and subscale scores of Patient Assessment of Constipation-Symptom questionnaires, and the total and subscale scores of Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life questionnaire. Patients' global assessment of treatment effectiveness, patients' expectation toward the effectiveness of acupuncture and safety of acupuncture will also be assessed. All efficacy analyses will be performed in the intention-to-treat population.DiscussionTo improve the adherence to intervention protocols, the majority of the participants will be recruited from an inpatient setting. The results will help to determine the clinical effects and safety of electroacupuncture for the treatment of OIC among patients with cancer.Clinical Trial Registrationwww.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03797586, registered on 4 January 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03797586.

Safety and Efficacy of Eluxadoline in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Diarrhea With or Without Bile Acid Diarrhea: Open-Label Study.

Eluxadoline, a peripherally acting, mixed µ- and κ-opioid receptor (OR) agonist and δ-OR antagonist, is approved for treatment of adults with irritable bowel syndrome-diarrhea (IBS-D). About a third of IBS-D patients has bile acid diarrhea (BAD); opioids may stimulate TGR5 (bile acid) receptors. To evaluate eluxadoline's efficacy on altered bowel functions and safety in IBS-D patients with or without BAD. In a single-center, phase 4, parallel-group, open-label study, patients with IBS-D (cohort 1) and patients with BAD were treated with eluxadoline, 100mg tablets BID, with food for 4weeks. Patients recorded bowel functions by electronic daily diary. BAD was based on fasting serum 7αC4 (> 52.5ng/mL) or concurrent criteria of increased total or primary fecal BAs excreted in 48h. We assessed efficacy on treatment compared to baseline in the two cohorts. Primary outcome measures were changes from baseline in average stool consistency Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) score (range 1-7) and safety. Mean changes from baseline in cohorts 1 and 2 (data presented in this order) were similar for: BSFS score averaged over 4weeks' treatment (-1.25 and -1.09); daily bowel movement frequency (-1.48 and -0.79); daily urgent bowel movements (-0.52 and -0.80); IBS-QoL (5.9 and 13.6); serum 7αC4 (-5.59 and -8.78ng/mL). There were no deaths, serious treatment-emergent adverse events, or discontinuations due to adverse events during the study. Eluxadoline is similarly efficacious in the treatment of IBS-D and BAD, and it appears to be safe and efficacious as documented in large clinical trials.

The Effect of Electroacupuncture Treatment with Different Intensities for Functional Diarrhea: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background Electroacupuncture (EA) may have a role in the treatment of diarrhea symptoms. However, the efficacy and safety of EA with different current intensities in improving gastrointestinal function, psychology, and quality of life (QOL) of functional diarrhea (FD) remain unknown. Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of EA with different current intensities in improving gastrointestinal function, psychology, and QOL for FD patients. Methods 73 FD patients were randomly divided into three groups: low current intensity group (LI) of EA, high current intensity group (HI) of EA, and loperamide control group (LC). Four weeks of treatment were provided in the three groups. The primary outcome was the proportion of normal defecation. Additional outcomes included the change from baseline for the weekly spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) and the change from baseline for the mean Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). QOL was assessed by the 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) were used to assess the psychology state. Results Low current intensity of EA significantly improved the proportion of normal defecation during treatment and follow-up period (P < 0.01). EA significantly improves the mean BSFS scores and weekly SBMs, and this efficacy is equivalent to loperamide (P < 0.05). The SF-36 scores of general health in LI and HI groups and vitality and mental health in LI group were significantly increased compared to baseline (P < 0.05). Low current intensity of EA can significantly improve SAS and SDS scores (P < 0.05). Conclusions EA significantly improved stool consistency and weekly SBMs in FD patients. Compared with loperamide, low current intensity of EA may have a better sustainable effect in restoring normal defecation in patients with FD, and it can also effectively improve QOL, anxiety, and depression. However, larger sample sizes are needed to determine safety and efficacy. Trial registration number: NCT01274793.

Linaclotide for treating patients with irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation: a multicentre study of real-world data in China.

Introduction:Linaclotide, a guanylate cyclase C agonist that improves the symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation (IBS-C), has been recently approved for IBS-C treatment. This study aimed to report real-world data on linaclotide treatment in China.Methods:This was a prospective multicentre study of the effectiveness of linaclotide treatment in patients with IBS-C from 10 primary medical institutions. Changes in defecation, abdominal symptoms, the IBS symptom severity scale (IBS-SSS), IBS quality of life questionnaire (IBS-QOL), Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale and Self-Rating Depression Scale in patients were evaluated to determine the drug’s clinical efficacy and safety.Results:We enrolled 97 patients (mean age: 52.39 ± 13.99 years), 55 of whom were women (56.7%). In terms of efficacy, the number of the patients’ defecation per week and Bristol stool form scale scores significantly increased at week 4 and week 12 compared with the values at the baseline. The baseline average IBS-SSS score was 211.01 ± 81.23. Of the patients, 24 had severe IBS-C, and their IBS-SSS scores at week 4 (51.81 ± 54.42) and week 12 (9.3 ± 30.39) significantly decreased and showed a pronounced improvement. The IBS-QOL total scores at week 4 and week 12 gradually decreased compared with that at the baseline and the QOL significantly improved. Treatment satisfaction rate was 79.3% in week 4 and 100% in week 12, showing a gradually increased satisfaction and significant differences. However, 11 cases (11.3%) had diarrhoea.Conclusion:Linaclotide has proved to be a safe and effective drug to improve IBS-C symptoms and severity.

The Efficacy and Safety of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Combined With Biofeedback for Mixed Constipation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) combined with biofeedback for patients with mixed constipation. Patients who received biofeedback (biofeedback group, n = 40) and those who received FMT combined with biofeedback (FMT combination group, n = 45) were enrolled. Spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) frequency, Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS), and Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) score were analyzed to evaluate the effect of treatment. Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) scores of patients were used to assess the quality of life, and the safety of FMT combination therapy was evaluated by the presence of adverse events. The 16S rRNA gene sequencing was performed on the fecal samples of 12 donors, feces of 31 patients before and after receiving FMT combination treatment. Comparing the biofeedback group and the FMT combination group 1 month after the treatment, significant differences were observed in the mean value of SBM frequency, BSFS, and PAC-SYM scores, which were 2.15 ± 1.05 vs. 3.61 ± 0.89 (p = 0.0031), 2.1 ± 0.9 vs. 2.5 ± 1.2 (p = 0.008), and 2.4 ± 0.5 vs. 2.2 ± 0.6 (p = 0.0021), respectively. Meanwhile, FMT combination therapy had long-term beneficial effects according to the data collected at six months and 12 months after the treatment. With respect to the quality of life, GIQLI scores were higher in the FMT combination group (103.6 ± 15.1) compared with that in the biofeedback group (88.7 ± 10.1) one month after administration (p = 0.0042). In addition, there were no significant differences between the two groups in adverse events, including abdominal pain, diarrhea, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, and other side effects. Results of 16S rRNA gene sequencing showing some well-known probiotics had significantly increased after FMT combination treatment compared with pre-FMT samples, such as Prevotella and Bifidobacterium. Findings of this study suggested that FMT combined with biofeedback could be effective and safe for patients with mixed constipation.

Elobixibat Effectively Relieves Chronic Constipation in Patients with Cancer Regardless of the Amount of Food Intake.

BackgroundConstipation is a common, distressing complication in patients with cancer receiving palliative care. Elobixibat is a novel inhibitor of the ileal bile acid transporter that is used to treat chronic constipation by stimulating bowel function. However, its efficacy in patients with cancer has not been examined. This study investigated the drug's effectiveness in patients with cancer with chronic constipation.Patients and MethodsThis prospective‐sampling, single‐center, observational study included hospitalized patients with cancer diagnosed, using the Rome IV criteria, with chronic constipation. Within 2 weeks of hospitalization, each participant was administered elobixibat (5–15 mg) daily until discharge. Spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs), complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs), Bristol stool form scale (BSFS) scores, and the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life questionnaire (PAC‐QOL) scores were assessed before and after elobixibat administration. We also evaluated the relationship between the amount of food consumed and the SBM frequency.ResultsAmong the 83 participants, the mean pre‐ and post‐treatment frequencies of daily SBMs were 0.3 and 1.2 (p < .0001) and those of CSBMs were 0.1 and 0.6 (p < .0001), respectively. The mean pretreatment BSFS score was 1.6, whereas the post‐treatment value was 3.5 (p < .0001); the mean PAC‐QOL score (overall) improved from 1.01 to 0.74 (p = .01). There was no significant change in the daily SBM frequency between fasting and feeding states (1.2 vs. 1.3; p = .8), and there was no correlation between the amount of food intake and the SBM frequency after elobixibat administration (r = .03). Serious adverse events were not observed.ConclusionThis study showed that elobixibat is safe and effective for patients with cancer with chronic constipation, regardless of the food intake amount.Implications for PracticeElobixibat was effective at relieving chronic constipation in patients with various cancers. Serious adverse events were not observed, and the relief of constipation was independent of variation in food intake.