Brief Pain Inventory Worst Research Articles

The impact of cannabidiol (CBD) on aromatase inhibitor (AI)-associated musculoskeletal symptoms (AIMSS).

e24060 Background: Although treatment with an AI for 5-10 years decreases 10-year breast cancer (BC) mortality by about 40%, up to 25% of patients will stop treatment early because of treatment-related, intolerable joint and muscle pain and stiffness, called AIMSS. Only acupuncture, duloxetine, and exercise have been shown to reduce AIMSS. While the exact underlying mechanism is unknown, it is thought to be due in part to ongoing systemic inflammation. CBD has anti-nociceptive and anti-inflammatory properties, making it a potential treatment option for AIMSS. Methods: Women with stage 0-3 hormone receptor-positive BC experiencing AIMSS (defined as worst joint pain ≥4/10 during prior 7 days that developed or worsened since starting AI therapy) were eligible for enrollment in this single arm, single center phase 2 open label clinical trial (NCT04754399). Patients received an FDA-approved formulation of CBD (Epidiolex), titrated over 4 weeks from 25 mg BID to 100 mg BID and then continued at maximum tolerated dose for a total of 15 weeks. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) data were collected serially, including the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and the PROMIS Profile 29+2 v2.1. The primary endpoint was the number of CBD-treated patients with at least a 2-point reduction (minimal clinically important difference) in worst pain from baseline to 15 weeks. Statistical analysis was completed using paired t-tests and linear mixed models. Results: Of 39 eligible patients (Table 1), 11 discontinued participation early due to patient discretion (n = 6) or adverse event (n = 5). There were no grade 3-4 toxicities. Analyzing data from all 39 patients, there was an improvement in BPI worst pain (0-10 scale) of 0.13 per week of treatment after baseline (p < 0.001), resulting in an average improvement in worst pain of 1.95 at the end of 15 weeks. Of the 28 patients who completed the study, 17 (60.7%) reported a ≥2-point improvement in BPI worst pain between baseline and week 15. There was a significant improvement in PROMIS T score at week 15 in both physical function (2.34, p = 0.01) and ability to participate in social roles and activities (2.71, p = 0.02). Conclusions: Treatment with CBD was associated with an improvement in joint pain for a subset of patients. Additional analyses are ongoing to further investigate the impact of CBD on AIMSS and to explore which patients are most likely to benefit from treatment with CBD. Clinical trial information: NCT04754399 . [Table: see text]

Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of Pain Before and After Removal of Nonobstructing Renal Calculi: A CoRE Initiative.

Flank pain associated with stone disease is typically caused by a stone that obstructs urine flow. However, it is plausible that nonobstructing kidney stones may still cause pain. We performed a multicenter, observational trial to evaluate whether treatment of small nonobstructing calyceal stones improves pain and kidney stone-specific health-related quality of life. Patients aged 18 years or older with nonobstructing renal stone(s) up to 10 mm in longest diameter and moderate to severe pain were recruited. All participants completed 3 questionnaires: the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference form 6a, and the Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life questionnaire. Thereafter, all participants underwent ureteroscopy for renal stone treatment. All 3 questionnaires were repeated at 2, 6 to 8, and at 12 weeks postprocedure. The primary outcomes were change in preoperative to 12-week postoperative mean BPI score and worst BPI pain score. A total of 43 patients with nonobstructing kidney stones and associated flank pain were recruited. All stones were removed. Preoperatively, BPI scores for mean pain and worst pain were 5.5 and 7.2, respectively which decreased to 1.8 and 2.8 respectively at 12 weeks postoperatively. Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life questionnaire mean score increased from 70.4 to 115.3 at 12 weeks postoperatively. A total of 86% and 69% of patients had at least a 20% and 50% reduction in their mean pain scores, respectively. This study determined that patients benefit significantly from the removal of calyceal nonobstructing kidney stones for at least 12 weeks with a reduction in pain and an increase in quality of life. Therefore, surgical removal of these stones in this patient population should be offered as a treatment option.

Prospective Longitudinal Assessment of Quality of Life After Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Oligometastases: Analysis of the Population-based SABR-5 Phase II Trial

AimsTo evaluate longitudinal patient-reported quality of life (QoL) in patients treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for oligometastases. Materials and methodsThe SABR-5 trial was a population-based single-arm phase II study of SABR to up to five sites of oligometastases, conducted in six regional cancer centres in British Columbia, Canada from 2016 to 2020. Prospective QoL was measured using treatment site-specific QoL questionnaires at pre-treatment baseline and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30 and 36 months after treatment. Patients with bone metastases were assessed with the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Patients with liver, adrenal and abdominopelvic lymph node metastases were assessed with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Abdominal Discomfort (FACIT-AD). Patients with lung and intrathoracic lymph node metastases were assessed with the Prospective Outcomes and Support Initiative (POSI) lung questionnaire. The two one-sided test procedure was used to assess equivalence between the worst QoL score and the baseline score of individual patients. The mean QoL at all time points was used to determine the trajectory of QoL response after SABR. The proportion of patients with ‘stable’, ‘improved’ or ‘worsened’ QoL was determined for all time points based on standard minimal clinically important differences (MCID; BPI worst pain = 2, BPI functional interference score [FIS] = 0.5, FACIT-AD Trial Outcome Index [TOI] = 8, POSI = 3). ResultsAll enrolled patients with baseline QoL assessment and at least one follow-up assessment were analysed (n = 133). On equivalence testing, the patients' worst QoL scores were clinically different from baseline scores and met MCID (BPI worst pain mean difference: 1.8, 90% confidence interval 1.19 to 2.42]; BPI FIS mean difference: 1.68, 90% confidence interval 1.15 to 2.21; FACIT-AD TOI mean difference: –8.76, 90% confidence interval –11.29 to –6.24; POSI mean difference: –4.61, 90% confidence interval –6.09 to –3.14). However, the mean FIS transiently worsened at 9, 18 and 21 months but eventually returned to stable levels. The mean FACIT and POSI scores also worsened at 36 months, albeit with a limited number of responses (n = 4 and 8, respectively). Most patients reported stable QoL at all time points (range: BPI worst pain 71–82%, BPI FIS 45–78%, FACIT-AD TOI 50–100%, POSI 25–73%). Clinically significant stability, worsening and improvement were seen in 70%/13%/18% of patients at 3 months, 53%/28%/19% at 18 months and 63%/25%/13% at 36 months. ConclusionsTransient decreases in QoL that met MCID were seen between patients' worst QoL scores and baseline scores. However, most patients experienced stable QoL relative to pre-treatment levels on long-term follow-up. Further studies are needed to characterise patients at greatest risk for decreased QoL.

Prospective Longitudinal Assessment of Quality of Life after Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Oligometastases: Analysis of the Population-Based SABR-5 Phase II Trial

To evaluate longitudinal patient-reported quality of life (QoL) in patients treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for oligometastases. The SABR-5 trial was a population-based single-arm phase II study of SABR to up to 5 sites of oligometastases, conducted in 6 regional cancer centers in British Columbia from 2016 to 2020. Prospective QoL was measured using treatment site-specific QoL questionnaires at pre-treatment baseline and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30, and 36 months after treatment. Patients with bone metastases were assessed with the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Patients with liver, adrenal, and abdominopelvic lymph node metastases were assessed with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Abdominal Discomfort (FACIT-AD). Patients with lung and intrathoracic lymph node metastases were assessed with the Prospective Outcomes and Support Initiative (POSI) lung questionnaire. The two one-sided test procedure was used to assess equivalence between the worst QoL score and baseline score of individual patients. Mean QoL at all time points was used to determine the trajectory of QoL response after SABR. The proportion of patients with "stable," "improved," or "worsened" QoL was determined for all time points based on standard minimal clinically important differences (MCID; BPI worst pain = 2, BPI Functional Interference Score [FIS] = 0.5, FACIT-AD Trial Outcome Index [TOI] = 8, POSI = 3). All enrolled patients with baseline QoL assessment and at least 1 follow-up assessment were analyzed (n = 135). On equivalence testing, patients' worst QoL scores were clinically different from baseline scores and met MCID (BPI worst pain mean difference: 1.8, 90% CI [1.19 to 2.42]; BPI FIS mean difference: 1.68, 90% CI [1.15 to 2.21]; FACIT-AD TOI mean difference: -8.76, 90% CI [-11.29 to -6.24]; POSI mean difference: -4.61, 90% CI [-6.09 to -3.14]). However, the mean FIS transiently worsened at 9, 18 and 21 months but eventually returned to stable levels. The mean FACIT and POSI scores also worsened at 36 months, albeit with a limited number of responses (n = 4 and 8, respectively). The majority of patients reported stable QoL at all time points (range: BPI worst pain 71-82%, BPI FIS 45-78%, FACIT-AD TOI 50-100%, POSI 25-73%). Clinically significant stability, worsening, and improvement were seen in 70%/13%/18% of patients at 3 months, 53%/28%/19% at 18 months and 63%/25%/13% at 36 months. SABR in the oligometastatic setting can lead to transient decreases in QoL. However, most patients experienced stable QoL relative to pre-treatment levels on long-term follow-up. Further studies are needed to characterize patients at greatest risk for decreased QoL.

Medical cannabis is effective for cancer-related pain: Quebec Cannabis Registry results

ObjectivesTo evaluate the safety and effectiveness of medical cannabis (MC) in reducing pain and concurrent medications in patients with cancer.MethodsThis study analysed data collected from patients with cancer who were...

Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor Observational Platform Project (TOPP) Registry: A 2-Year Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Treatment Strategies.

The Tenosynovial giant cell tumor Observational Platform Project (TOPP) registry is an international prospective study that -previously described the impact of diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumour (D-TGCT) on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from a baseline snapshot. This analysis describes the impact of D-TGCT at 2-year follow-up based on treatment strategies. TOPP was conducted at 12 sites (EU: 10; US: 2). Captured PRO measurements assessed at baseline, 1-year, and 2-year follow-ups were Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Pain Interference, BPI Pain Severity, Worst Pain, EQ-5D-5L, Worst Stiffness, and -Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. Treatment interventions were no current/planned treatment (Off-Treatment) and systemic treatment/surgery (On-Treatment). A total of 176 patients (mean age: 43.5 years) were included in the full analysis set. For patients without active treatment strategy -(Off-Treatment) at baseline (n = 79), BPI Pain Interference (1.00 vs. 2.86) and BPI Pain Severity scores (1.50 vs. 3.00) were numerically favorable in patients remaining Off-Treatment compared with those who switched to an active treatment strategy at year 1. From 1-year to 2-year -follow-ups, patients who remained Off-Treatment had better BPI Pain Interference (0.57 vs. 2.57) and Worst Pain (2.0 vs. 4.5) scores compared with patients who switched to an alternative treatment strategy. In addition, EQ-5D VAS scores (80.0 vs. 65.0) were higher in patients who remained -Off-Treatment between 1-year and 2-year follow-ups compared with patients who changed treatment strategy. For patients receiving systemic treatment at baseline, numerically favorable scores were seen in patients remaining on systemic therapy at 1-year follow-up: BPI Pain Interference (2.79 vs. 5.93), BPI Pain Severity (3.63 vs. 6.38), Worst Pain (4.5 vs. 7.5), and Worst Stiffness (4.0 vs. 7.5). From 1-year to 2-year follow-up, EQ-5D VAS scores (77.5 vs. 65.0) were higher in patients who changed from systemic treatment to a different treatment strategy. These findings highlight the impact D-TGCT has on patient quality of life, and how treatment strategies may be influenced by these outcome measures. (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02948088).

Acupoint Thread Embedding Combined With Wenshen Bugu Decoction for the Treatment of Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Musculoskeletal Symptom Among Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Patients: Study Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are recommended as the preferred therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer. As a result, aromatase inhibitor-associated musculoskeletal symptom (AIMSS) have become a major problem leading to therapy discontinuation and decreased quality of life in patients receiving adjuvant AIs treatment. Multiple therapies have been attempted, but have yielded limited clinical results. This study will be performed to determine whether acupoint thread embedding (ATE) combined with Wenshen Bugu Decoction can effectively treat AIMSS, so as to improve the AIs medication compliance of postmenopausal breast cancer patients. This study will utilize a randomized, 2 parallel groups controlled trial design. A total of 128 eligible postmenopausal breast cancer women with AIMSS will be randomized to receive a 12-week treatment with Wenshen Bugu Decoction alone (control group) or in combination with ATE (treatment group) in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome will be the 12 week Brief Pain Inventory Worst Pain (BPI-WP) score. The secondary outcome measures will include response rate, Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BFI-SF), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endocrine Symptom (FACT-ES), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B), bone marrow density (BMD), blood markers of bone metabolite, Morisky medication adherence scale-8 (MMAS-8), credibility and expectancy, and survival outcomes. This trial may provide clinical evidence that ATE combined with Wenshen Bugu Decoction can be beneficial for treating AIMSS among postmenopausal breast cancer survivors. Our findings will be helpful to enhance the quality of life and reduce the occurrence of AIs withdrawal.

Comparison of Acupuncture vs Sham Acupuncture or Waiting List Control in the Treatment of Aromatase Inhibitor–Related Joint Pain

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have proven efficacy for the treatment of hormone-sensitive breast cancer; however, arthralgias (pain and stiffness) contribute to nonadherence with therapy for more than 50% of patients. To examine the effect of acupuncture in reducing AI-related joint pain through 52 weeks. A randomized clinical trial was conducted at 11 sites in the US from May 1, 2012, to February 29, 2016, with a scheduled final date of follow-up of September 5, 2017, to compare true acupuncture (TA) with sham acupuncture (SA) or waiting list control (WC). Women with early-stage breast cancer were eligible if they were taking an AI and scored 3 or higher on the Brief Pain Inventory Worst Pain (BPI-WP) item (score range, 0-10; higher scores indicate greater pain). Analysis was conducted for data received through May 3, 2021. Participants were randomized 2:1:1 to the TA (n = 110), SA (n = 59), or WC (n = 57) group. The TA and SA protocols were composed of 6 weeks of intervention at 2 sessions per week (12 sessions overall), followed by 6 additional weeks of intervention with 1 session per week. Participants randomized to WC received no intervention. All participants were offered 10 acupuncture sessions to be used between weeks 24 and 52. In this long-term evaluation, the primary end point was the 52-week BPI-WP score, compared by study group using linear regression, adjusted for baseline pain and stratification factors. Among 226 randomized women (mean [SD] age, 60.7 [8.6] years; 87.7% White; mean [SD] baseline BPI-WP score, 6.7 [1.5]), 191 (84.5%) completed the trial. In a linear regression, 52-week mean BPI-WP scores were 1.08 (95% CI, 0.24-1.91) points lower in the TA compared with the SA group (P = .01) and were 0.99 (95% CI, 0.12-1.86) points lower in the TA compared with the WC group (P = .03). In addition, 52-week BPI pain interference scores were statistically significantly lower in the TA compared with the SA group (difference, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.00-1.16; P = .05). Between 24 and 52 weeks, 12 (13.2%) of TA, 6 (11.3%) of SA, and 5 (10.6%) of WC patients reported receipt of acupuncture. In this randomized clinical trial, women with AI-related joint pain receiving 12 weeks of TA had reduced pain at 52 weeks compared with controls, suggesting long-term benefits of this therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01535066.

Long-term results from a randomized blinded sham- and waitlist-controlled trial of acupuncture for joint symptoms related to aromatase inhibitors in early stage breast cancer (S1200).

12018 Background: Musculoskeletal symptoms are the most common side effect of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) among breast cancer (BC) survivors. We previously reported that true acupuncture (TA) resulted in better pain outcomes than either sham acupuncture (SA) or wait-list controls (WC) at 6 weeks with durable effects through 24 weeks, with minimal toxicity. We now report the 52-week outcomes. Methods: We conducted a SWOG multicenter randomized controlled trial among postmenopausal women with early-stage BC. Patients taking an AI for ≥30 days and reporting a worst pain score of ≥3 out of 10 using the Brief Pain Inventory-Worst Pain (BPI-WP) were eligible. Subjects were randomized 2:1:1 to TA vs. SA vs. WC. Both the TA and SA protocols consisted of a 12-week intervention, with 2 sessions per week for 6 weeks, followed by 1 session per week for 6 additional weeks. At 24 weeks, all subjects remained blinded to intervention arm but were offered 10 sessions of true acupuncture. Endpoints included BPI scores, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) for hips and knees, the Modified Score for the Assessment of Chronic Rheumatoid Affections of the Hands (M-SACRAH), PROMIS Pain Inventory Short Form (PI-SF), and Functional Assessment of Cancer therapy Endocrine Symptoms (FACT-ES). Results: Among 226 patients registered, 110 were randomized to TA, 59 to SA and 57 to WC. Baseline characteristics were similar among the arms. At 52 weeks, follow-up assessments were available for 91 (82.7%) TA, 53 (89.8%) SA, and 47 (82.5%) WC patients. In a linear regression adjusting for the baseline score and stratification factors, 52-week mean BPI-WP scores were 1.08 points lower (correlating with less pain) in the TA compared to SA arm (95% CI: 0.24-1.91, p =.01), and were 0.99 points lower in the TA compared to WC arm (95% CI: 0.12-1.86, p =.03). The proportion of patients experiencing a clinically meaningful (>2) reduction (i.e. improvement) in BPI-WP was 64% for TA compared to 45% on SA and 53% on WC. Patients randomized to TA had reduced BPI pain interference at 52 weeks compared to SA (adjusted difference = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.00-1.16, p =.05) but not compared to WC (adjusted difference = 0.33, 95% CI: -0.28-0.93, p =.29). Also, at 52 weeks, patients randomized to TA had improved PROMIS PI-SF T-scores compared to SA (adjusted difference = 2.35, 95% CI: 0.07-4.63, p =.04) but not compared to WC (adjusted difference = 1.28, 95% CI: -1.09-3.66, p =.29). No statistically significant differences were observed in other measures. Conclusions: Women with breast cancer receiving AI therapy and treated with 12 weeks of TA for joint symptoms had reduced levels of worst pain compared to control patients, an effect that was durable through one year despite completion of protocol acupuncture at 12 weeks, and the offering of acupuncture to all participants at 24 weeks. Clinical trial information: NCT01535066.

Clinical pain management by a multidisciplinary palliative care team: Experience from a tertiary cancer center in China.

To investigate the effect of multidisciplinary interventions on pain management in cancer inpatients.Four hundred thirty eight patients with cancer pain, who performed the multidisciplinary intervention were recruited. Before and after intervention, the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) score as the primary endpoints and QOL scores as the secondary endpoint were all evaluated. To investigate the factors that led to different responses to multidisciplinary interventions, patients were classified as non-responders or responders.Finally, 92 patients (63 male and 29 female) scheduled for cancer pain management by inter-professional team were studied. After individualized multidisciplinary therapy, both pain and symptom severity was improved, as demonstrated by lowered BPI worst and average pain scores, as well as symptom severity score measured by MDASI (P = .017, P = .003, and P = .011, respectively). The proportion of patients with mild pain increased regarding the BPI worst and average pain at baseline and after treatment (P < .05). The QOL analyses showed multidisciplinary interventions could significantly improve the function and symptom scores (P < .001). More patients in responder group received chemotherapy (58, 70.7%, P = .003), while fewer received mini-invasive therapy (6, 7.32%, P = .011).Multidisciplinary interventions had certain beneficial effect on cancer pain management, especially in patients with moderate or severe pain.

Effect on pain outcomes in patients treated for painful bone metastases with biopolar RFA: The OPuS One study.

11605 Background: To report the preliminary outcomes from the prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter study of the OsteoCool Radiofrequency Ablation system used for the palliative treatment of patients with painful bone metastases (OPuS One Study). Methods: Subjects were prospectively enrolled (NCT03249584) from October 2017 through August 2018. Inclusion criteria were: 2 or less painful target sites involving the thoracolumbar spine, pelvis and/or sacrum, with a worst pain ≥4/10 measured by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) within the previous 24 hours. RFA was performed with the OsteoCool device (Medtronic) under imaging guidance and followed by cementoplasty at operator discretion. Subjects were evaluated prior to RFA, at discharge, 3 days, 1 week, and 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months. Demographics and disease characteristics were collected at baseline and outcomes were assessed using validated measures. Device-, procedure- and/or therapy-related adverse events (AEs) were collected. Results: At the time of the analysis, 37 subjects at 8 US centers underwent RFA. The mean age was 64 years (range 30-89) and 68% were female. Mean baseline BPI worst pain was 8.6. The most common histology was adenocarcinoma; breast (32%) and lung (24%) were reported as the most common primary cancer. Thirty-one subjects (84%) were treated for lesions involving the thoracolumbar spine, while 6 subjects (16%) were treated for lesions located the pelvis and/or sacrum. All RFA procedures were technically successful. Of the 14 subjects presenting at the 3-month visit, 93% did not undergo radiation therapy at the targeted site(s) between baseline and 3 months. Seventy-four percent (25/34) of subjects at 1 week and 93% (13/14) of subjects at 3 months reported a clinically significant change from baseline in worst pain of ≥ 2 points. One AE, drug hypersensitivity, resolved without intervention. All eleven deaths reported were attributed to the subjects underlying malignancy and not related to RFA. Conclusions: The preliminary results of the OPuS One study show rapid pain improvement at 1 week and sustained long-term relief through 3 months in patients with metastatic bone disease. Clinical trial information: NCT03249584.

Abstract No. 618 Rapid pain improvement in patients treated for painful bone metastases with the Medtronic Osteocool RF Ablation system: the OPuS One study

To report the preliminary outcomes from the prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter study of Medtronic’s OsteoCool Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) system used for the palliative treatment of patients with painful bone metastases (OPuS One Study). Subjects were prospectively enrolled (NCT03249584) from October 2017 through August 2018. Inclusion criteria were: 2 or less painful target sites involving the thoracolumbar spine, pelvis and/or sacrum, with a worst pain ≥4/10 measured by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) within the previous 24 hours. RFA was performed with the OsteoCool device under imaging guidance and followed by cementoplasty at operator discretion. Subjects were evaluated prior to RFA, at discharge, 3 days, 1 week, and 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months. Demographics and disease characteristics were collected at baseline and outcomes were assessed using validated measures. Device-, procedure- and/or therapy-related adverse events (AEs) were collected. At the time of the analysis, 37 subjects at 8 US centers underwent RFA. The mean age was 64 years (range 30-89) and 68% were female. Mean baseline BPI worst pain was 8.6. The most common histology was adenocarcinoma; breast (32%) and lung (24%) were reported as the most common primary cancer. Thirty-one subjects (84%) were treated for lesions involving the thoracolumbar spine, while 6 subjects (16%) were treated for lesions located the pelvis and/or sacrum. All RFA procedures were technically successful. Of the 14 subjects presenting at the 3-month visit, 93% did not undergo radiation therapy at the targeted site(s) between baseline and 3 months. Seventy-four percent (25/34) of subjects at 1 week and 93% (13/14) of subjects at 3 months reported a clinically significant change from baseline in worst pain of ≥ 2 points. One AE, drug hypersensitivity, resolved without intervention. All eleven deaths reported were attributed to the subjects underlying malignancy and not related to RFA. The preliminary results of the OPuS One study show rapid pain improvement at 1 week and sustained long-term relief through 3 months in patients with metastatic bone disease.

Individuals with Chronic Pain Who Misuse Prescription Opioids Report Sex-Based Differences in Pain and Opioid Withdrawal.

Objective Individuals with chronic pain who misuse prescription opioids are at high risk for developing opioid use disorder and/or succumbing to opioid overdose. The current study conducted a survey to evaluate sex-based differences in pain catastrophizing, opioid withdrawal, and current pain in persons with co-occurring chronic pain and opioid misuse. We hypothesized that women with chronic pain who misused prescription opioids would self-report higher pain ratings compared with men and that the relationship between pain catastrophizing and self-reported current pain would be moderated by symptoms of opioid withdrawal in women only. Design Survey assessment of the relationship between pain and opioid misuse. Setting Online via Amazon Mechanical Turk. Participants Persons with ongoing chronic pain who also misused prescription opioids on one or more days in the last 30 days were eligible (N = 181). Methods Participants completed demographic and standardized assessments including the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale (SOWS). Results Women reported higher levels of current (P < 0.001), average (P < 0.001), and worst (P = .002) pain in the last 24 hours compared with men. Women also endorsed higher scores on the PCS (P = 0.006) and marginally higher past-30-day SOWS ratings (P = 0.068) compared with men. SOWS ratings moderated the relationship between PCS and BPI Worst Pain in women (ΔR2 < 0.127, ΔF(1, 78) = 12.39, P = 0.001), but not in men (ΔR2 < 0.000, ΔF(1, 98) = 0.003, P = 0.954). Conclusions These data suggest a strong relationship between opioid withdrawal, pain catastrophizing, and the experience of pain in women with chronic pain who misuse opioids.

Effect of Early Management on Pain and Depression in Patients with Pancreatobiliary Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: The present study assessed whether early palliative care (EPC) targeting pain and depression and automated symptom monitoring could improve symptoms in patients with advanced pancreatobiliary cancer. Methods: Patients diagnosed with pathologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic or biliary tract cancer who had cancer-related pain (brief pain inventory (BPI) worst pain score >3) and/or depression (Center for Epidemiological Studies—Depression Scale (CES-D) >16) were randomized within 8 weeks after diagnosis to receive EPC or on-demand palliative care (n = 144 each). EPC included (1) nursing assessment of pain and depression, (2) pain control based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, (3) depression control by psychoeducation and/or consultation with a psychiatric specialist, and (4) patient education. The primary end points were ≥50% reductions from baseline to week 4 in pain and depression scores. Results: The proportion of patients in the EPC and usual care groups with ≥50% reductions in pain (29.5% vs. 25.2%; p = 0.4194) and depression (30.8% vs. 36.8%; p = 0.5732) scores from baseline to week 4 did not differ significantly. The proportion of patients with BPI worst pain score ≤3 was significantly higher (51.1% vs. 38.9%, p = 0.0404) and the reduction in pain intensity score significantly greater (1.5 vs. 1.0 points, p = 0.0318) in the EPC than in the usual care group. At 4 weeks, patients in the EPC group reported significant increases in global health status, role of functioning, nausea and vomiting, and pain scores on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) general questionnaire. Conclusions: Although the primary outcome was not met, this trial indicates that EPC may improve early pain relief in patients with advanced pancreatobiliary cancers.

Omega-3 fatty acid use for obese breast cancer patients with aromatase inhibitor-related arthralgia (SWOG S0927).

Although aromatase inhibitors (AIs) prolong survival in post-menopausal breast cancer (BC) patients, AI-associated arthralgia can lead to discontinuation. Obese patients have higher rates of AI arthralgia than non-obese patients, but treatment options are limited. Omega-3 fatty acid (O3-FA) treatment for AI arthralgia has produced mixed results. We performed an exploratory analysis of SWOG S0927, a multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trial of O3-FA use for AI arthralgia. Post-menopausal women with stage I-III BC taking an AI were randomized to 24 weeks of O3-FAs or placebo. Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) questionnaires and fasting serum were collected at baseline, 12, and 24 weeks. The BPI assessment included worst pain, average pain, and pain interference scores (range 0-10). Among the 249 participants, 139 had BMI < 30kg/m2 (56%) and 110 had BMI ≥ 30kg/m2 (44%). Among obese patients, O3-FA use was associated with significantly lower BPI worst pain scores at 24 weeks compared with placebo (4.36 vs. 5.70, p = 0.02), whereas among non-obese patients, there was no significant difference in scores between treatment arms (5.27 vs. 4.58, p = 0.28; interaction p = 0.05). Similarly, O3-FA use was associated with lower BPI average pain and pain interference scores at 24 weeks compared with placebo among obese patients, but no significant difference between treatment arms in non-obese patients (interaction p = 0.005 and p = 0.01, respectively). In obese BC patients, O3-FA use was associated with significantly reduced AI arthralgia compared to placebo.

Effect of Acupuncture vs Sham Acupuncture or Waitlist Control on Joint Pain Related to Aromatase Inhibitors Among Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Musculoskeletal symptoms are the most common adverse effects of aromatase inhibitors and often result in therapy discontinuation. Small studies suggest that acupuncture may decrease aromatase inhibitor-related joint symptoms. To determine the effect of acupuncture in reducing aromatase inhibitor-related joint pain. Randomized clinical trial conducted at 11 academic centers and clinical sites in the United States from March 2012 to February 2017 (final date of follow-up, September 5, 2017). Eligible patients were postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer who were taking an aromatase inhibitor and scored at least 3 on the Brief Pain Inventory Worst Pain (BPI-WP) item (score range, 0-10; higher scores indicate greater pain). Patients were randomized 2:1:1 to the true acupuncture (n = 110), sham acupuncture (n = 59), or waitlist control (n = 57) group. True acupuncture and sham acupuncture protocols consisted of 12 acupuncture sessions over 6 weeks (2 sessions per week), followed by 1 session per week for 6 weeks. The waitlist control group did not receive any intervention. All participants were offered 10 acupuncture sessions to be used between weeks 24 and 52. The primary end point was the 6-week BPI-WP score. Mean 6-week BPI-WP scores were compared by study group using linear regression, adjusted for baseline pain and stratification factors (clinically meaningful difference specified as 2 points). Among 226 randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 60.7 [8.6] years; 88% white; mean [SD] baseline BPI-WP score, 6.6 [1.5]), 206 (91.1%) completed the trial. From baseline to 6 weeks, the mean observed BPI-WP score decreased by 2.05 points (reduced pain) in the true acupuncture group, by 1.07 points in the sham acupuncture group, and by 0.99 points in the waitlist control group. The adjusted difference for true acupuncture vs sham acupuncture was 0.92 points (95% CI, 0.20-1.65; P = .01) and for true acupuncture vs waitlist control was 0.96 points (95% CI, 0.24-1.67; P = .01). Patients in the true acupuncture group experienced more grade 1 bruising compared with patients in the sham acupuncture group (47% vs 25%; P = .01). Among postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer and aromatase inhibitor-related arthralgias, true acupuncture compared with sham acupuncture or with waitlist control resulted in a statistically significant reduction in joint pain at 6 weeks, although the observed improvement was of uncertain clinical importance. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01535066.

Patient-reported outcomes for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving docetaxel and Atrasentan versus docetaxel and placebo in a randomized phase III clinical trial (SWOG S0421)

BackgroundSWOG S0421 was a large randomized trial comparing docetaxel/prednisone plus placebo (DPP) to docetaxel/prednisone plus atrasentan over 12 cycles for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The current report presents the PRO results for this trial, an important secondary endpoint.MethodsThe trial specified two primary PRO endpoints. Palliation of worst pain was based on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), where a 2 point difference is defined as clinically meaningful. Improvement of functional status was based on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Prostate Cancer Trial Outcome Index (FACT-P TOI); a 5-point difference has been defined as clinically meaningful. We compared rates by arm using chi-square tests. Longitudinal analyses using linear mixed models addressed changes by arm over time.ResultsFour-hundred eighty-nine patients on each arm were evaluable for PRO endpoint data. There were no differences by arm in clinically meaningful pain palliation (41.7% for DPP vs. 44.0% for DPA, p = .70) or functional status (24.2% for DPP vs. 28.7% for DPA, p = .13). Longitudinal comparisons indicated no differences over time by arm for BPI Worst Pain scores (0.13 points, p = .23). Patients on the DPA arm had improved functional status of 1.78 points on average, a statistically significant (p = .02) but not clinically meaningful difference.ConclusionsThe SWOG S0421 PRO data showed little evidence of clinically meaningful differences by arm in either pain palliation or functional status.

Abstract P6-11-01: Final results of the randomized trial of exercise intervention vs. usual care for breast cancer patients with aromatase inhibitor to prevent and improve the aromatase inhibitor induced arthralgia

Abstract Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have been used in the adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive early breast cancer as a consequence of the significant benefit in DFS and OS when compared with tamoxifen. However the patients who receive AIs have an increased risk of arthralgia, at most 50% of patients did not take AIs and the 20% of the discontinued patients were within the first year of use. The HOPE study demonstrated that exercise was effective in improving AI-induced arthralgia. We conducted the AIAI (Arthralgia Improvement for the patients with Aromatase Inhibitors) study using wider eligibility criteria that the HOPE study to assess the impact on AI induced arthralgia in breast cancer patients. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 3:1 ratio, to exercise intervention or usual care. Following randomization participants could choose from 3 types of exercise including group 1 (120-150 minutes per week of walking or running), group 2 (daily NIPPON HOSO KYOKAI: NHK broadcast exercise in Japan) and group 3 (going up the stairs- frequency, etc). The primary endpoint was the arthralgia change at 6 and 12 months, which was assessed using the BPI (Brief Pain Inventory). Secondary endpoints included the BPI according to the completion rate of exercise (70% and more or less than 70%), the BPI change of the patients with arthralgia (the patients who had arthralgia at the time they enrolled this study; BPI worst pain 3≤), the BPI of the each exercise group, the BPI according to the duration of AIs therapy (24 months and more or less than 24 months), the correlation between the BMI change and the BPI change, adherence of AIs and safety. 102 were randomly assigned to exercise intervention group (22 patients dropped out of this study) and 37 to usual care group (9 patients dropped out of this study).Trends for differentiations of pain interference at 12 months was detected between exercise intervention group and usual care group, but the differences did not reach statistical significance (p = .067). There was statistically better pain interference of the 70% and more exercise completion group than the usual care group at 12 months (-0.29±1.22 for exercise intervention group and 0.33±0.88 for usual care group, p= .002). The change of pain interference was statistically better for the exercise intervention group than the usual care group at 12 months (p= .017, -0.61±0.69 for exercise intervention group and 1.14±1.56 for usual care group). There was statistically significant difference of pain interference between group 1 exercise intervention group and the usual care group at 12 months (-0.14±0.68 for group 1 exercise intervention group and 0.33±0.88 for the usual care group, p= .009). Tendencies were detected in the AIs therapy less than 24 months group. Trends for the correlation between BPI and BMI were detected in worst pain at 6 month, pain severity at 6 month and pain interference at 12 month. There was a statistically significant difference of AIs adherence between the exercise intervention group (99%) and the usual care group (92%) (P=0.03). Exercise may be effective in improving and preventing AI-induced arthralgia. Citation Format: Tamaki K, Takaesu M, Nagamine S, Terukina S, Kamada Y, Uehara K, Takigami N, Arakaki M, Yamashiro K, Miyashita M, Ishida T, McNamara KM, Tamaki N, Sasano H. Final results of the randomized trial of exercise intervention vs. usual care for breast cancer patients with aromatase inhibitor to prevent and improve the aromatase inhibitor induced arthralgia [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-11-01.

The contribution of pain in determining the health status of cancer patients with bone metastases: A secondary analysis of data from three Phase III registration trials

We aimed to provide a simple, descriptive health-status profile for cancer patients with bone metastases, based on the EuroQol EQ-5D, a tool commonly used to measure health utility scores, and to evaluate its association with the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), a legacy pain-assessment tool. Although pain is one of five health-status dimensions measured by the EQ-5D, our understanding of how pain relates to the other EQ-5D dimensions is limited. We derived data from 5500 patients with bone metastases who completed the EQ-5D and BPI. Regression analyses examined how BPI severity and interference scores correlated with EQ-5D utility scores and how BPI items associated with EQ-5D items, for the entire sample and by disease-type subgroup. Regardless of cancer site, the percentage of patients reporting moderate/severe problems in each of the five EQ-5D dimensions were pain/discomfort, 78%; usual activities, 58%; mobility, 55%; anxiety/depression, 57%; and self-care, 26%. BPI pain interference explained more of the variability in the EQ-5D utility scores than did pain severity (R2 =41% vs. 34%). BPI worst pain, average pain, pain now, interference with general activity, and interference with work significantly predicted EQ-5D pain/discomfort, with odds ratio estimates <1. Pain/discomfort was the worst-rated dimension of the EQ-5D in this population, but the relationship of this item to BPI pain severity was modest, suggesting that the single pain item of the EQ-5D may be of limited utility in studies for which pain is an endpoint. Health-status dimensions include more than pain. We examine the contribution of pain severity and pain-related functional interference in determining the health status of cancer patients with bone metastases. The pain dimension from a health-status measure may be an inadequate metric in clinical trials/clinical practice when pain is an important outcome.

Effect of acupuncture on aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia in patients with breast cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PurposeAromatase inhibitor (AI)-induced arthralgia (AIA) is a common side effect that may lead to premature discontinuation of effective hormonal therapy in patients with breast cancer. Acupuncture may relieve joint pain in patients with AIA. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture in pain relief in AIA. MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry were searched for studies published before February 2017. Individual effect sizes were standardized, and a meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the pooled effect size by using a random effect model. Pain was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at 3–4, 6–8, and 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included disability level, upper extremity function, physical performance, and quality of life. ResultsFive trials involving 181 patients were reviewed. Significant pain reduction was observed after 6–8 weeks of acupuncture treatment. Patients receiving acupuncture showed a significant decrease in the BPI worst pain score (weighted mean difference [WMD]: −3.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −5.15 to −2.47) and the WOMAC pain score (WMD: −130.77, 95% CI: −230.31 to −31.22) after 6–8 weeks of treatment. One of the 4 trials reported 18 minor adverse events in 8 patients during 398 intervention episodes. ConclusionAcupuncture is a safe and viable nonpharmacologic treatment that may relieve joint pain in patients with AIA. Additional studies involving a higher number of RCTs are warranted.