Method Of Breast Reconstruction Research Articles

Prevention of the development of diastasis of the wound edges during two-stage breast reconstruction

The main problem of breast reconstruction after a mastectomy is the complete destruction of all structural elements of the breast and the lack of integumentary tissues that do not allow carrying out one-stage breast reconstruction. To solve this problem, usually performing a two-stage reconstruction, which today is the most commonly used method of breast reconstruction. The peculiarity of this method is that after removal of the expander, during the second stage of reconstruction, some retraction of the skin and a decrease in the area of the prepared skin cover are observed. Thus, after installing a permanent implant and suturing the surgical wound, the skin sheath is tightened around the installed endoprosthesis, while the greater the retraction of the skin, the more pronounced the tension appears and, accordingly, the load on the sutured wound increases. As a result, the risks of developing diastasis of the wound edges with the exposure of the endoprosthesis increase, which leads to the need to remove the implant. Therefore, when carrying out the second stage of breast reconstruction, a very important moment of the operation is the suturing of the postoperative wound, the competent implementation of which allows the prevention of implant extrusion.

Use of a controlled negative pressure system for the treatment of periprosthetic breast complications

Background. One of the most common methods of breast reconstruction after mastectomy for malignant tumors is reconstruction using an endoprosthesis. However, this technique is associated with the risk of developing periprosthetic complications. The classic solution to this problem is to remove the endoprosthesis, achieve complete remission of the infectious process and repeat the cycle of reconstructive measures. In this work we present a new approach to the treatment of periprosthetic complications.Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness of the controlled negative pressure system (CNP) in the treatment of periprosthetic breast complications.Materials and methods. From 2019 to 2023, the study included 23 patients who underwent combined/complex treatment for breast cancer, including reconstructive plastic surgery with the installation of endoprostheses, and 1 patient who underwent aesthetic surgery was included. All patients experienced various complications after the reconstructive stage: protrusion of the endoprosthesis, ischemia of the flap and/or local inflammation. To relieve the complications that arose, treatment was carried out using a flushing system and a CNP.Results. The duration of therapy with the sequential installation of a flushing system followed by replacement with a СNP averaged 15 days. In 7 cases out of 24, it was not possible to preserve or reinstall endoprostheses due to thinning of the musculocutaneous flap, resistance of the microflora to the treatment, or relapse of the infectious process. In 17 cases, no complications were recorded after re-installation of endoprostheses for 2 years. As a result of the work, in most cases, within one hospitalization, it was possible to preserve the skin sheath, achieve complete regression of complications and perform repeated reconstructive interventionConclusion. In most cases, the use of a CNP allows you to save the bed for the full installation of a new endoprosthesis. To do this, a number of conditions must be met: absence of microflora growth; presence of granulation after treatment; full thickness and integrity of the musculocutaneous flap. Systemic treatment and a history of radiation therapy are not a contraindication to retaining endoprostheses.

"Autologous Breast Dermal Filler": A Novel Technique for Breast Reconstruction After Nipple- or Skin-Sparing Mastectomy in Pubertal Gigantomastia.

For females in puberty, mastectomy caused by pathological gigantomastia usually brings significant psychological problems. Appropriate immediate breast reconstruction method is necessary. The aim of this study is to present a novel method of breast reconstruction that requires neither implants nor donor-site sacrifice. All patients who were diagnosed with pathological gigantomastia and indicated for nipple-sparing or skin-sparing mastectomy (NSM or SSM) were selected. All extra skin was de-epithelialized, followed by NSM or SSM through a vertical incision on the lower pole of the breast. Then, a skin and dermal envelope in all directions was formed. Whether to preserve the nipple-areolar complex depended on its perfusion. The dermal flap was folded inward to serve as the "autologous dermal filler" and reconstruct the breast. A second surgery of inframammary fold elevation for larger projection was performed at least 6 months. Follow up for at least 1 year and record complications as well as pre- and postoperative BREAST-Q Scores. A total of 11 breasts were included. Four (36.4%) were NSM and seven (63.6%) were SSM. Nipple to sternal notch distance in NSM and SSM was 32.3±9.1cm and 35.1±4.4cm, respectively. No complications occurred, while one breast with NSM showed nipple upward displacement. The BREAST-Q indicated significant postoperative improvements in breast satisfaction (20.5 ± 11.3 vs 80.2 ± 10.4) and psychosocial well-being (23.4 ± 8.9 vs. 81.4 ± 11.3). Preliminary study demonstrated the efficacy and long-term safety of "autologous breast dermal filler." For adolescents, it is a less invasive autologous breast reconstruction method, or transitional plan for further adjustment in adulthood. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The Learning Curve of Total Breast Reconstruction With Autologous Fat Transfer.

Total breast reconstruction with autologous fat transfer (AFT) is a relatively new breast reconstruction method. Although AFT was predominantly used to correct postsurgical defects, the surgical skills of a total breast reconstruction with AFT are different and can be facilitated for novices to accelerate their learning process. This study aims to assess the learning curve of plastic surgeons in total breast reconstruction with AFT in the Netherlands. A mixed-methods study was performed based on the multicenter randomized clinical BREAST trial data. For the qualitative analysis, semistructured interviews were conducted. To test hypotheses derived from the qualitative data, retrospective data analysis was performed using multilevel linear regression analysis of the patients undergoing AFT as a total breast reconstruction method. The interviews revealed that plastic surgeons need to perform the procedure several times to learn and experience the technical details of total breast reconstruction with AFT. Learning and improving this technique works best by scrubbing in with an expert. Before plastic surgeons learn the optimal volume of fat reinjection over time, they tend to inject too little fat and subsequently too much fat over multiple procedures. With more experience, the rigottomy technique becomes more important. Besides technical details, managing patient expectations before starting treatment is paramount. Multilevel linear regression revealed a significant decrease (P < 0.001) in the number of surgical procedures and the total injected volume (P = 0.002) to complete a total breast reconstruction with AFT. This is the first study that explores the learning curve involved in using AFT as a total breast reconstruction method. The feeling of when fat transfer is sufficient, and how to release scars for a good result without causing seromas, is best learned by scrubbing in with experienced colleagues during several procedures, interchanged with starting one's own practice.

Assessment of Use of Subcutaneous Mastectomy with Silicon Prostheses as Treatment of Early Breast Cancer

Abstract Background Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women and the second most common cause of cancer death in the United States. Approximately 268,600 new breast cancer diagnoses and 41,760 cancer- related deaths in the U.S. were estimated for 2019. SSM (skin sparing mastectomy) is defined as a simple or radical surgery with modified minimal incisions that retain the widest possible coverage and sub-cutaneous breast groove but dry the NAC, flaws of previous biopsies and/or scarring caused by diagnostic percutaneous biopsies. Access to the armpit for a possible sentinel-node biopsy or axillary dissection is obtained through the same incision. An additional incision may be necessary to perform the reconstructive procedure (e.g., microsurgical axillary anastomosis). Objective To study the risks and benefits of use subcutaneous mastectomy with silicon prosthesis as treatment of early breast cancer: as regards the impact of radiotherapy administration on implant, psychological impact, operative time and post-operative complications including complication of silicon, effect on wound healing. Patients and Methods This prospective interventional study was conducted at tertiary care hospital at the general surgery department in Ain Shams University hospitals and Misr University for Science and Technology (MUST) hospital and from November 2021, till July 2022 and performed on total 15 females suffering from stage I-II infiltrating breast carcinomas. Results The current study revealed that mean ±SD of age of the studied cases was 46.3±7.4. Regarding tumor site, LOQ was the most frequent (40.0%), followed by UIQ (33.3%), then UOQ (20.0%) and lastly LIQ (6.7%). Concerning T grades, T1 was in (46.7%), while the remaining (53.3%) were T2. Concerning N grades, N0 was in (73.3%), while the remaining (26.7%) were N1. Sentinel lymph nodes done in 73.3% of cases. As regards operative characteristics, Axillary clearance done in less than half of cases (46.7%), while nipple sparing achieved in less than quarter of cases (20.0%). As regards post-mastectomy treatment, majority of cases (86.7%) received hormonal therapy, adjuvant radiotherapy to axilla was (46.7%), chemotherapy (33.3%), while immunotherapy was (6.7%). As regards postoperative side effects, Pain was the most frequent postoperative side effect; detected in (33.3%) of cases, followed by seroma (20.0%), then flap necrosis (13.3%), and the least frequent was hematoma (6.7%). As regards postoperative patients’ satisfaction, mean ±SD of Postoperative patients’ satisfaction was 7.3±1.5 with range 5.0 − 10.0. Near half of the studied cases (46.7%) had 7.0 − 8.0 satisfaction grade. Conclusion Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) and nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with immediate subcutaneous silicon implantation are an acceptable and safe method for breast reconstruction. It offers a number of advantages including ease of dissection for surgeons, improved symmetry, and low complication rates. With improvements in surgical techniques in preserving mastectomy skin flap viability, the traditionally higher rates of complications in subcutaneous implants may be outdated. The present study can burden the knowledge and shed some light on future prospective studies with larger sample sizes to evaluate a cost benefit analysis and patient and surgeon assessment of outcomes to directly compare with traditional submuscular single- or 2- stage implant-based reconstruction.

A Multi-Center Retrospective Observational Analysis of Three-Year Experience of Our Protocol for Prevention and Monitoring of Surgical Site Infections in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

With the rise in the mastectomy rate, the number of patients who choose to undergo postmastectomy reconstruction has been increasing, and implant-based procedures are the most performed methods for postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Among the possible complications, the most feared is the loss of reconstruction. It can be related to several reasons, but one of the most common is infection of the implant, which can lead to prolonged antibiotic treatment, undesired additional surgical procedures, increased incidence of capsular contracture, and unsatisfactory aesthetics results, with a huge psychological impact on patients. The primary intent of this study is to analyze the status of infection rates at our institution and evaluate the effectiveness of our prevention protocol since its introduction. Secondly, we compared data of the surgical site infections (SSIs) after implant-based breast reconstruction at Trieste Hospital, where the protocol has been employed since 2020, and in another center, where plastic surgeons of our team are involved, with different prevention procedures. We enrolled 396 female patients, who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction, using definitive mammary implants or breast tissue expanders, with or without ADM (acellular dermal matrix), both for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1/2 patients. Patients treated at the Hospital of Trieste, with the use of the prevention protocol, were considered the experimental group (group 1), while patients treated in Gorizia by the same breast team with standardized best-practice rules, but without the use of the prevention protocol, were considered the control group (group 2). Infected patients were 5 in the first group (1.7%) and 8 in the second one (7.9%), with a global infection rate of 3.2%. After the introduction of our prevention protocol, we faced a lower incidence of infection after breast surgery with implants or tissue expanders.

Еffect of Radiation Therapy on Breast Reconstruction in Breast Cancer Patients

Background. The surgical stage remains the main one in the combined and complex treatment of breast cancer. Radical mastectomy and reconstructive plastic surgery are the main option for surgical treatment of vast majority patients. Radiation therapy can lead to the development of complications after breast reconstruction, and vice versa, the reconstructed mammary gland can cause technical difficulties for the radiologist to properly adjust the required dose of irradiation. Aim — to choose the optimal method of breast reconstruction using various implants, as well as endoprostheses to minimize post-radiation complications and maintain a high level of quality of life for patients after breast cancer treatment. Methods. The retrospective study was conducted in the department of oncology and reconstructive plastic surgery of the breast and skin in the P.A. Herzen Moscow Research Oncology Institute from June 2013 to November 2017. There were performed 132 operations: 111 subcutaneous mastectomy with one-stage reconstruction with an endoprothesis and 21 mastectomy with a one-stage reconstruction with an endoprothesis. The distribution by stages: I — 57, IIA — 39, IIB — 17, IIIA — 13, IIIC 4; 2 cases of breast sarcoma. Prophylactic mastectomy of the contralateral gland was performed in 22 patients, mastopexy in 8, augmentation in 20. Polyurethane implants were applied in 82 cases (62%). Radiation therapy was performed in 47 patients with total dose 45 Gy. Bilateral reconstruction was performed in 22 patients. Results. The mean follow-up period was 28.44 ± 14.66 months (from 6 to 48 months). The most frequent complication in the postoperative period was the development of capsular contracture: seroma — 20 patients, hematoma — 2, edge necrosis — 6, protrusion — 6, infection — 2 patients. The most common capsular contracture by Baker was III degree, n = 18. The average period of development of capsular contracture was 7.6 ± 11.65 months. Conclusion. Despite the greater number of complications during the one-stage reconstruction, the implants remain in advantage in choosing a method of treating breast cancer by both the patient and the surgeon.

ENDOSCOPIC DRAINAGE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF INFECTED SUBCUTANEOUS COLLECTIONS FOLLOWING DIEP FLAP RECONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUE: A CASE REPORT

Abstract Aim The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap procedure is a widely accepted method for immediate breast reconstruction following skin-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer patients. While complications are infrequent, challenges may arise, including surgical wound infection, skin necrosis, seroma, or hematoma. Methods We present the case of a 68-year-old woman with multifocal infiltrating carcinoma of the right breast (T1cN0M0) who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction one month before presenting to the emergency room. Her symptoms included a fever of 38°C, abdominal filling in the DIEP scar region, an elevated leukocyte count (23.01 × 10E3/microL), and a C-reactive protein level of 470 mg/L. Abdominal CT revealed a collection in the infraumbilical anterior abdominal wall extending through the subcutaneous cellular tissue of both iliac fossae. The patient underwent surgical intervention, including endoscopic drainage with lavage and drain placement under direct visualization. Results Following surgery, the patient responded positively to intravenous Meropenem, with the resolution of fever and improvement in local cellulitis. She was discharged on the 6th postoperative day with both drains, removed 10 and 15 days after surgery in an outpatient setting. Conclusions In cases where immediate percutaneous drainage is not feasible, endoscopic drainage emerges as an effective strategy for managing extensive infectious collections. This technique, involving lavage, debridement, and drain placement under direct vision, eliminates the need to reopen substantial surgical wounds. Notably, this approach aids early recovery in patients undergoing active chemotherapy, preventing delays in chemotherapy administration.

Efficacy of Exclusive Fat Grafting for Breast Reconstruction: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Exclusive fat grafting is an alternative method to implant- or flap- based reconstruction techniques following mastectomies or breast conservation therapies. Its efficacy has been explored before but new data has come to light, resulting in previous results becoming outdated. Concerns have also been raised about the oncological safety of this procedure which must be evaluated alongside the efficacy to gain a comprehensive understanding of the merits of this alternative technique. We queried the PubMed electronic database from its inception until August 2023 for studies evaluating the efficacy and oncological safety of exclusive fat grafting breast reconstruction following cancer-related mastectomy or breast conservation therapy. Results of the analysis were pooled and presented as means or valid proportions. Results of the analysis were pooled using a random-effects model and presented with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) where appropriate. 41 studies were included in our analysis. Pooled results show that on average, 1.7 sessions of exclusive fat grafting were required to complete reconstruction in Breast Conservation Therapy (BCT) patients, with an average volume of 114.2 ml being injected. For mastectomy patients with irradiated breasts, 4.7 sessions were needed on average with 556.8 ml being required to complete reconstruction, compared to their non-irradiated Counterparts requiring only 2.6 sessions and 207.2 ml to complete reconstruction. Oncological recurrence events were found in 29/583 non-irradiated mastectomy patients (p = 0.014) and in 41/517 BCT patients (p = 0.301) CONCLUSION: Exclusive fat grafting is an oncologically safe and reasonably efficacious alternative to more common methods of breast reconstruction. More data is needed to fully characterize the oncological safety of this procedure in irradiated and non-irradiated mastectomy patients. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Abstract PO2-22-09: The impact of blood loss and blood pressure management in DIEP flap surgery– a retrospective analysis of 206 patients

Abstract Introduction: Autologous breast reconstruction using the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap has excellent success rates and a natural aesthetic result. Therefore, this method and its management are of great importance in modern oncoplastic surgery. In particular, women who have undergone radiation therapy after mastectomy benefit from this satisfactory and usually uncomplicated method of breast reconstruction. To achieve a desirable outcome, the effects of blood loss and blood pressure management may play an important role. In this analysis, we hypothesize that neither postoperative blood pressure management (using catecholamines) nor the amount of blood loss (defined by the median hemoglobin level difference) will worsen the surgical outcome or increase the complication rate. Patients and Methods: We performed a multicenter, multisurgeon retrospective analysis with the following primary end points: intraoperative blood loss and postoperative blood pressure management. Secondary endpoints included serious complications including flap loss and minor complications. Patients (n=194) were included from 2014-2018 at St. Antonius Hospital in Eschweiler and from 2016 to July 2018 at the Cologne Municipal Breast Cancer Center in Holweide. Patients underwent either unilateral (n=180) or bilateral (n=13) breast reconstructions with DIEP flaps, resulting in a total of n=206 cases. The subgroup regarding blood pressure management was defined by cohorts with or without catecholamine administration and included all n=206 cases. Blood loss was defined by median hemoglobin level difference and could be calculated in n=199 cases. The cohorts of the two subgroups were comparable. Results: Six flap losses were detected in a total of 206 cases (2.9%). The distribution of flap losses in the blood pressure management subgroup was not statistically significant (p=.67), while the test was not available for the blood loss subgroup. Furthermore, the analysis showed that there were no significant differences in the rates of overall complications related to the amount of blood loss intraoperatively (p= .06) or blood pressure management postoperatively (p= .19). Conclusion: DIEP flap surgery is a safe method for autologous breast reconstruction, independent of blood loss and blood pressure management. Citation Format: Hanna Fritsch, Cosima Schreiber, Wolfram Malter, Matthias Warm, Max Zinser, Alexander Bach, Christian Eichler. The impact of blood loss and blood pressure management in DIEP flap surgery– a retrospective analysis of 206 patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-22-09.

Abstract PO5-23-06: Predictive Factors for Reconstructive Method and Outcomes in Mutation-Positive Breast Cancer Patients

Abstract Background: BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations significantly increase the risk of breast cancer, and prophylactic mastectomy reduces the risk by around 90% in these patients. Previous studies have explored predictors of mastectomy type in high-risk genetic mutation patients, but further characterization is needed. This study aims to identify factors associated with resection and reconstruction methods and predictors of postoperative complications in mutation-positive (M+) patients. Methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort study included patients with a genetic predisposition for breast cancer undergoing breast surgery, seen between January 2016 and October 2022. Patient demographics, comorbidities, oncologic history, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression were performed. Results: Among the 176 patients analyzed, 75 (42.6%) had BRCA1, 71 (40.3%) had BRCA2, 11 (6.3%) had PALB2, and 8 (4.5%) had CHEK2 mutations. Mean age and body mass index (BMI) were 41.0±17 years and 24.9±6.9 kg/m2, respectively. Among patients with prior breast reconstruction (n=86, 48.9%), augmentation mammoplasty (n=31, 17.6%) was the most common procedure, followed by oncologic resection (n=21, 11.9%) and reduction mammoplasty (n=15, 8.5%). Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) (n=107, 60.8%) was the most frequent surgical approach, followed by skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) (n=43, 24.4%), simple mastectomy (n=14, 8.0%), lumpectomy (n=4, 2.3%), and radical mastectomy (n=4, 2.3%). Tissue expander (n=77, 43.8%) was the most common reconstruction method. By a median follow-up duration of 23.9 months, 66 (37.5%) of patients experienced postsurgical complications. Operative complications recorded within 30 days included seroma (n=9, 5.1%), hematoma (n=8, 4.5%), cellulitis (n=10, 5.7%), dehiscence (n=13, 7.4%), surgical site infection (n=11, 6.3%), and delayed wound healing (DWH) (n=24, 13.6%). Other long-term complications included mastectomy flap necrosis (n=22, 12.5%), total reconstructive failure (n=9, 5.1%), red breast syndrome (n=2, 1.1%), and capsular contracture (n=12, 6.8%). The choice of autologous breast reconstruction was correlated with younger age (OR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.69-0.95, p = 0.012) and Hispanic or Latino race (OR 0.01, 95% CI: 0.001-0.25, p=0.007). BMI was significantly correlated with incidence of hematoma (OR 1.17, 95% CI: 1.02-1.33, p=0.024), DWH (OR=1.1, 95% CI: 1.01-1.20, p=0.030), and dehiscence (OR 1.25, 95% CI: 1.09-1.43, p=0.001). Choice of autologous reconstruction was positively correlated with DWH (OR 8.86, 95% CI: 2.25-34.86, p=0.002) and dehiscence (OR 18.24, 95% CI: 2.58-129.158, p=0.004). Conclusion: In this macroscopic study, the most common breast reconstruction method for M+ patients was tissue expander-based. However, only autologous reconstruction was found to have positive correlates, specifically younger age and Hispanic or Latino origin. Younger patients may pursue this method given less concern for short term complications, which are historically increased in autologous reconstruction. Minority distrust of foreign medical material implantation may play a role in Hispanic or Latino choice. Additionally, autologous reconstruction and BMI were associated with certain postoperative complications, particularly dehiscence, DWH, and hematoma, results consistent with general breast cancer surgery cohorts. This study helps better characterize the M+ population and contributes insight into the resection and reconstructive choice in this patient population. Citation Format: Shrayus Sortur, Jaytin Gupta, Christian Lava, Lauren Berger, Varsha Harish, Zoya Khan, Daisy Spoer, Lindy Rosal, Ian Greenwalt, Lucy De La Cruz, David Song, Kenneth Fan. Predictive Factors for Reconstructive Method and Outcomes in Mutation-Positive Breast Cancer Patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-23-06.

Disparities in Breast Reconstruction: An Analysis of Treatment Choices.

Breast reconstruction methods vary based on factors such as medical history, breast size, and personal preferences. However, disparities in healthcare exist, and the role race plays in accessing to different reconstruction methods is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the influence of race and/or ethnicity on the type of breast reconstruction chosen. This retrospective cohort study analyzed the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Magee Women's Hospital database, including patients who underwent breast cancer surgery from 2011 to 2022. Multivariate analysis examined race, reconstruction, and reconstruction type (P < 0.05). The database included 13,260 women with breast cancer; of whom 1763 underwent breast reconstruction. We found that 91.8% of patients were White, 6.8% Black, and 1.24% were of other races (Asian, Chinese, Filipino, Vietnamese, unknown). Reconstruction types were 46.8% implant, 30.1% autologous, and 18.7% combined. Among Black patients, autologous 36.3%, implant 32.2%, and combined 26.4%. In White patients, autologous 29.5%, implant 48%, and combined 18.2%. Among other races, autologous 36.3%, implant 40.9%, and combined 22.7%. In patients who underwent breast reconstruction, 85.2% underwent unilateral and 14.7% of patients underwent bilateral. Among the patients who had bilateral reconstruction, 92.3% were White, 6.1% were Black, and 1.5% were of other ethnicities. Our analysis revealed differences in breast reconstruction methods. Autologous reconstruction was more common among Black patients, and implant-based reconstruction was more common among Whites and other races. Further research is needed to understand the cause of these variations.

Triplane technique for breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery: A case series report.

Implant-based breast reconstruction is an important method for post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. Currently, the most commonly used technique is the biplane technique. However, the high rate of postoperative complications, the inability of pockets to accommodate larger implants, and the expensive costs of biological mesh make the development of new surgical methods urgent. The triplane technique for breast reconstruction is an ideal candidate method. The main local symptoms were breast lump, abnormal breast skin, nipple discharge, and abnormal nipple or areola in 24 patients. The study included 24 female patients who underwent breast reconstruction using the triplane technique after radical breast cancer surgery. The surgical procedure involved measuring the dimensions of the breast, designing the incision, and creating a pocket for the implant using the triplane technique, which includes the pectoralis major muscle, the pectoralis major fascia continuing to the rectus abdominis fascia, and the latissimus dorsa muscle fascia continuing to the rectus abdominis fascia. Postoperative follow-up included regular assessments of pain and evaluation of breast appearance. No cases of postoperative infection were observed in all patients. During the 1-year follow-up period after surgery, 5 patients (20.8%) who needed radiotherapy after mastectomy for cancer showed slight darkening of skin flap pigment after using the triplane technique implant. No cases of exposure or infection of the expanders were reported, and 1 patient underwent expander replacement with a permanent prosthesis. All patients expressed satisfaction with the reconstructed breast shape. The 10 patients (41.7%) experiencing postoperative swelling and pain. However, the pain gradually subsided during the postoperative recovery period. No cases of local recurrence or distant metastasis of breast cancer were observed during the 1-year-follow-up period. The triplane technique for breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery provides good implant coverage, reduces the risk of complications, and is cost-effective.

Polyvinyl alcohol/collagen composite scaffold reinforced with biodegradable polyesters/gelatin nanofibers for adipose tissue engineering

Breast cancer has become the most diagnosed cancer type, endangering the health of women. Patients with breast resection are likely to suffer serious physical and mental trauma. Therefore, breast reconstruction becomes an important means of postoperative patient rehabilitation. Polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel has great potential in adipose tissue engineering for breast reconstruction. However, its application is limited because of the lack of bioactive factors and poor structural stability. In this study, we prepared biodegradable polylactic acid-glycolic acid copolymer/polycaprolactone/gelatin (PPG) nanofibers. We then combined them with polyvinyl alcohol/collagen to create tissue engineering scaffolds to overcome limitations. We found that PPG fibers formed amide bonds with polyvinyl alcohol/collagen scaffolds. After chemical crosslinking, the number of amide bonds increased, leading to a significant improvement in their mechanical properties and thermal stability. The results showed that compared with pure PVA scaffolds, the maximum compressive stress of the scaffold doped with 0.9 g nanofibers increased by 500 %, and the stress loss rate decreased by 40.6 % after 10 cycles of compression. The presence of natural macromolecular gelatin and the changes in the pore structure caused by nanofibers provide cells with richer and more three-dimensional adsorption sites, allowing them to grow in three dimensions on the scaffold. So, the hydrogel scaffold by reinforcing polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel with PPG fibers is a promising breast reconstruction method.

Effect of Perioperative Prophylactic Intravenous Antibiotic Use in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study.

Background Among breast reconstruction methods, implant-based breast reconstruction has become the mainstream. However, periprosthetic infection is still an unresolved problem. Although published articles have revealed that limited use of antibiotics is sufficient to reduce infection rates, the number of surgeons still preferring elongated usage of antibiotics is not less. The aim of our study is to validate the appropriate duration of antibiotic use to reduce infection rate after implant-based breast reconstruction. Methods A retrospective study reviewed medical record of 235 patients (274 implants for reconstruction) who underwent prepectoral direct to implant breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix wrapping technique. Infection rates were analyzed for the patients administered postoperative prophylactic antibiotics until drain removal and those who received only perioperative prophylactic antibiotics for 24 hours. Results Of the 274 implants, 98 who were administered prophylactic antibiotics until drain removal had an infection rate of 3.06% (three implants) and 176 who received prophylactic antibiotics no longer than 24 hours postoperatively had an infection rate of 4.49% (eight implants). A total of 11 patients diagnosed with postoperative infection clinically, 8 were salvaged by antibiotic treatment, and 3 had implant removal and replacement with autologous flap. Postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis duration had no statistically significant effects in the risk of infection ( p = 0.549). Conclusion The duration of prophylactic antibiotics after surgery was not related to infection risk. Further study with a large number of patients, randomized control study, and route of antibiotics is needed.

Aesthetic Evaluation and Validation: Umbilicus Reconstruction after DIEP Flap.

The most common method for autologous breast reconstruction is the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap. The umbilicus can be managed in various ways, including re-inset, neoumbilicus, and umbilectomy without reconstruction. This study evaluated the aesthetic differences in umbilicus reconstruction choice and variation in patients' postoperative satisfaction with their abdomen. A retrospective review of 1,019 patients treated with DIEP flap breast reconstruction between August 2009 and January 2022 was conducted. Patients were stratified by management of the umbilicus: preservation and re-inset of the native umbilicus, umbilectomy with delayed reconstruction, and umbilectomy with no reconstruction. A crowdsourced survey was created to assess the aesthetic preference of each photograph using a Likert scale. There were 1,063 responses to the umbilicus preference crowd source survey. Patients who had delayed umbilicus reconstruction after umbilectomy were rated to be significantly more attractive (4.397 ± 1.697) than both preservation of the native umbilicus (4.176 ± 1.669) and lack of the umbilicus (3.994 ± 1.733; p < 0.001 and <0.001, respectively). In an analysis of the BREAST-Q scores, delayed reconstruction patients had a similar change across measures when compared to the re-inset group. The delayed group had a significantly higher change in overall satisfaction and well-being with abdomen when compared with the no reconstruction group (p = 0.006 and 0.027, respectively). This study demonstrates that umbilectomy with delayed reconstruction yields a significantly higher aesthetic rating and comparable patient satisfaction when compared to re-inset of the umbilicus.

Moving the needle: a narrative review of enhanced recovery protocols in breast reconstruction.

After a relatively late introduction to the literature in 2015, enhanced recovery protocols for breast reconstruction have flourished into a wealth of reports. Many have since described unique methodologies making improved offerings with superior outcomes attainable. This is a particularly interesting procedure for the study of enhanced recovery as it encompasses two dissident approaches. Compared to implant-based reconstruction, autologous free-flap reconstruction has demonstrated superiority in a range of long-term metrics at the expense of historically increased peri-operative morbidity. This narrative review collates reports of recovery protocols for both approaches and examines methodologies surrounding the key pieces of a comprehensive pathway. All primary clinical reports specifically describing enhanced recovery protocols for implant-based and autologous breast reconstruction through 2022 were identified by systematic review of PubMed and Embase libraries. Twenty-five reports meeting criteria were identified, with ten additional reports included for narrative purpose. Included studies were examined for facets of innovation from the pre-hospital setting through outpatient follow-up. Notable findings were described in the context of a comprehensive framework with attention paid to clinical and basic scientific background. Considerations for implementation were additionally discussed. Of 35 included studies, 29 regarded autologous reconstruction with majority focus on reduction of peri-operative opioid requirements and length of stay. Six regarded implant-based reconstruction with most discussing pathways towards ambulatory procedures. Eighty percent of included studies were published after the 2017 consensus guidelines with many described innovations to this baseline. Pathways included considerations for pre-hospital, pre-operative, intra-operative, inpatient, and outpatient settings. Implant-based studies demonstrated that safe ambulatory care is accessible. Autologous studies demonstrated a trend towards discharge before post-operative day three and peri-operative opioid requirements equivalent to those of implant-based reconstructions. Study of enhanced recovery after breast reconstruction has inspired paradigm shift and pushed limits previously not thought to be attainable. These protocols should encompass a longitudinal care pathway with optimization through patient-centered approaches and multidisciplinary collaboration. This framework should represent standard of care and will serve to expand availability of all methods of breast reconstruction.

Successful fat-only whole breast reconstruction using cultured mature adipocytes and conditioned medium containing MCP-1

A mastectomy is a curative treatment for breast cancer. It causes breast and soft tissue deficits, resulting in a chest with poor vascularity. Autologous tissue breast reconstruction is commonly associated with donor site morbidity. Breast implants are another reconstruction alternative, but they are associated with infection, rupture, and the need for replacement. Autologous aspirated fat grafting has appeared as an ideal breast reconstruction method, but low graft viability and high resorption remain as the main shortcomings. We developed a novel method for fat-only grafts using cultured mature adipocytes (CMAs) mixed with their condition medium. Twenty-five mastectomy patients, aged 32–72 years, received a mixed grafting of CMAs, MCP1-containing condition medium, and fat grafts for total breast reconstruction. In follow-up periods of 24–75 months, MRI analysis showed full thickness fat-engraftment. The cell proliferation marker Ki67 was negative in post-transplant biopsy specimens from all patients. Aesthetic full breast morphology was achieved, patient satisfaction was evaluated 1 year and 3–6 years after surgery. All grafts were confirmed safe, demonstrating high reliability and long-term sustainability.

Autologous Fat Grafting as a Stand-Alone Procedure for Post-Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction and the Potential for Improvement using Adipose-Derived Stem Cells

Autologous fat grafting is an appealing method for breast reconstruction following mastectomy for breast cancer. Surgeons often perform this technique to optimize the aesthetic results of the more popular implant-based or autologous breast reconstruction by correcting residual defects and contour lines. Autologous fat grafting is less invasive, less costly, and easier than the reconstructive procedures mentioned. These advantages pose the possibility of using this method as a stand-alone procedure for post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. However, the literature is inconsistent when describing harvesting and processing methods and reporting patient outcomes. Graft retention rates are also variable. The use of adipose-derived stem cells can address the issue of unpredictable graft retention due to their angiogenic and adipogenic action. The novelty of using stem cells with autologous fat grafting also raises concerns, especially regarding its oncologic safety. This review aims to present a critical perspective of the literature on autologous fat grafting as a stand-alone procedure for post-mastectomy breast reconstruction and highlight areas for further research that can improve its outcome. Moreover, it discusses the potential use of adipose-derived stem cells in conjunction with autologous fat grafting to improve graft retention and the considerations surrounding the safety of this procedure.

An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Tissue Oximetry Versus Conventional Methods for Postoperative Monitoring of Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

Tissue oximetry monitoring has shown superior outcomes to conventional monitoring methods for autologous breast reconstruction in retrospective studies with consecutive cohorts. A recent study used consecutive cohorts with tissue oximetry as the earlier cohort and found that tissue oximetry was nonsuperior. We hypothesize that improvement in microsurgical outcomes with institutional experience confounds the superiority of tissue oximetry demonstrated in prior studies. This study aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcomes of tissue oximetry monitoring compared with conventional monitoring. Relevant studies were found using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science searches for keywords such as near-infrared spectroscopy or tissue oximetry and microsurgery. Studies included compared tissue oximetry and conventional monitoring in autologous breast reconstruction patients. Studies were excluded if they did not contain a comparison group. Random-effective models were used to analyze early returns to the operating room, the total number of partial or complete flap loss, and late fat necrosis. Six hundred sixty-nine studies were identified; 3 retrospective cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 1644 flaps were in the tissue oximetry cohort, and 1387 flaps were in the control cohort. One study contained tissue oximetry as the former cohort; 2 had tissue oximetry as the latter. Neither technique was superior for any measured outcomes. The estimated mean differences between tissue oximetry and conventional monitoring method were early returns, -0.06 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.52 to 0.410; P = 0.82); partial flap loss, -0.04 (95% CI, -0.86 to 0.79; P = 0.93); complete flap loss, -1.29 (95% CI, -3.45 to 0.87; P = 0.24); and late fat necrosis -0.02 (95% CI, -0.42 to, 0.39; P = 0.94). In a systematic review and meta-analysis of mixed timeline retrospective cohort studies, tissue oximetry does not provide superior patient outcomes and shifts our current understanding of postoperative breast reconstruction monitoring. Prospective studies and randomized trials comparing monitoring methods need to be included in the existing literature.