Breast-conserving Surgery For Breast Cancer Research Articles

Current trends in marking the tumor bed for radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer

Current trends in marking the tumor bed for radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer

Safety and Effectiveness of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Breast-Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer: A Single-Institution Study

Purpose: As breast-conserving surgery (BCS) has become the most common type of breast surgery, oncoplastic BCS has developed in response to improve cosmetic outcomes. Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) has been used as an adjunct to enhance cosmetic outcomes in partial breast reconstruction. This study aimed to evaluate postoperative complications, cosmetic satisfaction, and oncologic safety over a short-term follow-up period. Methods: This retrospective study included 26 patients who underwent BCS at Myongji Hospital between April 2019 and April 2021. All procedures were performed by three surgeons. We reviewed demographic data, histologic grades, tumor-node-metastasis stages, treatment modalities, and survival data based on patient medical records. Results: Of the 26 total patients, 5 developed seromas, which was the most common complication, and one patient experienced red breast syndrome. The incidence of complications per surgeon was less than 25%. The mean satisfaction score for the cosmetic outcome on a 10-point scale was 7.6 ( ± 2.1) as scored by patients and 8.8 ( ± 0.9) as scored by surgeons. Responses regarding cosmetic satisfaction revealed no significant differences among surgeons (<i>p</i>= 0.444). Of the 26 patients, four were lost to follow-up, and the mean follow-up period was 35.2 months. Two patients experienced recurrence, both of whom had regional recurrence with no local recurrence. Conclusion: ADM replacement is a favorable alternative to oncoplastic BCS, in terms of the ease of surgical procedures, minimal complications, and low rates of local recurrence.

Long-term oncologic outcome of breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer with BRCA 1/2 mutation (ON-BRCA II, KoREa-BSG 06).

552 Background: Among patients with sporadic breast cancer, it is well known that prognoses are similar following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) versus mastectomy. However, previous data assessing oncologic outcomes between BCS and mastectomy in patients with BRCA mutation are limited and inconsistent. Thus, this study aims to compare the oncologic outcomes including locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant recurrence (DR), and overall survival (OS) among this population. Methods: Patients with BRCA mutation and index breast cancer who underwent BCS or mastectomy between January 2008 and December 2015 were retrospectively screened from 13 institutions. We included patients aged from 20-80 with invasive breast cancer (pT1-3 N0-3). Patients with de novo metastasis were excluded. To minimize selection bias from retrospective nature, the propensity score matching (PSM) with Greedy nearest neighbor method was performed for covariates including age, molecular subtype, and tumor stage. Results: A total of 553 patients with BRCA mutation were identified. Among them, 367 (66.2%) patients received BCS and 186 (33.8%) were treated with mastectomy. After 1:1 PSM, there was no significant differences in age, molecular subtype, tumor size, nodal status, and histologic tumor grade between patients undergoing BCS versus mastectomy. At 8.3 years of median follow up, LRR, DR, and OS rates did not differ between groups (all p > 0.05). On multivariate analysis, type of breast surgery (BCS vs. mastectomy) was not significantly associated with the oncologic outcomes after adjusting covariates including age, molecular subtype, tumor stage, and histologic grade (all p > 0.05). Additionally, we performed subgroup analysis in matched patients based on tumor size, LN metastasis, HG, and subtype. In all subgroup, the type of breast surgery was not a significant risk factor influencing disease recurrence. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that there was no difference in oncologic outcomes among BRCA mutation carriers who underwent BCS or mastectomy. Breast conservation with close surveillance is a reasonable treatment option for BRCA mutation carriers. Further studies combined with prospectively collected data are warranted to validate our findings.

Simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy post breast-conserving surgery: clinical efficacy, adverse effects, and cosmetic outcomes in breast cancer patients

BackgroundSimultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) is an innovative technique delivering a higher dose to the tumor bed while irradiating the entire breast. This study aims to assess the clinical outcomes, adverse effects, and cosmetic results of SIB-IMRT following breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer patients.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 308 patients with stage 0–III breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery and SIB-IMRT from January 2016 to December 2020. The prescribed doses included 1.85 Gy/27 fractions to the whole breast and 2.22 Gy/27 fractions or 2.20 Gy/27 fractions to the tumor bed. Primary endpoints included overall survival (OS), local–regional control (LRC), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), acute and late toxicities, and cosmetic outcomes.ResultsThe median follow-up time was 36 months. The 3-year OS, LRC, and DMFS rates were 100%, 99.6%, and 99.2%, respectively. Five patients (1.8%) experienced local recurrence or distant metastasis, and one patient succumbed to distant metastasis. The most common acute toxicity was grade 1–2 skin reactions (91.6%). The most common late toxicity was grade 0–1 skin and subcutaneous tissue reactions (96.7%). Five patients (1.8%) developed grade 1–2 upper limb lymphedema, and three patients (1.1%) had grade 1 radiation pneumonitis. Among the 262 patients evaluated for cosmetic outcomes at least 2 years post-radiotherapy, 96.9% achieved excellent or good results, while 3.1% had fair or poor outcomes.ConclusionsSIB-IMRT after breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer patients demonstrated excellent clinical efficacy, mild acute and late toxicities, and satisfactory cosmetic outcomes in our study. SIB-IMRT appears to be a feasible and effective option for breast cancer patients suitable for breast-conserving surgery.

Does Breast Surgery Type Alter Incidental Axillary Irradiation? A Dosimetric Analysis of the "Sentinel Envahi et Randomisation du Curage" SERC Trial.

An incidental axillary dose of adjuvant radiotherapy using tangential beams is usually given after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer. The goal of this sub-study was to evaluate this incidental dose in the setting of post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) according to two different radiotherapy techniques. Patients participating in a randomized SERC trial who received PMRT in a single center were included. We collected the incidental axillary dose delivered to the Berg level 1 using different dosimetric parameters and compared two techniques using Student's t-test: three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and volumetric arc therapy (VMAT). We analyzed radiotherapy plans from 52 patients who received PMRT from 2012 to 2021. The mean dose delivered to the Berg level 1 was 37.2 Gy. It was significantly higher with VMAT than with 3D-CRT-43.6 Gy (SD = 3.1 Gy) versus 34.8 Gy (SD = 8.6 Gy) p < 0.001. Eighty-four percent of the Berg level 1 was covered by 40 Gy isodose in the VMAT group versus 55.5% in the 3D-CRT group p < 0.001. On the Berg level 1, PMRT gives a dose at least equivalent to the one given by post-breast-conserving surgery radiotherapy, making it possible to limit completion axillary lymph node dissections in select pN1a patients treated with a mastectomy. Modern radiotherapy techniques like VMAT tend to increase this incidental dose.

Algoritmo para la selección de colgajos perforantes perimamarios en reconstrucción inmediata poscirugía conservadora

Background: Chest wall perforator flaps are a good option for immediate breast reconstruction after conservative surgery. Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the clinical results of an algorithm for using chest wall perforator flaps for breast reconstruction after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer. Material and methods: We conducted a descriptive and retrospective study. The information was retrieved from the medical records of the patients diagnosed with breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery and required reconstruction using chest wall perforator flaps between January 2020 and March 2022. The indications included volume deficit, contour defect and asymmetry. The vascular pedicle of the flap was evaluated by color Doppler ultrasound in all cases, which allowed us to follow an algorithm for selecting the best flap option. Results: Twenty flaps were made in 19 patients. Mean age: 52 years ± 11 (range 30-76). There were no intraoperative complications. One patient required reoperation due to a hematoma with compression of the vascular pedicle of the flap with partial flap loss, and another flap presented superficial epidermolysis. There were no cases of complete flap loss. All the patients underwent postoperative radiation therapy without loss of volume or retractions. Mean follow-up was 15 months. At 6 months, patients rated the results as excellent, good, and fair in 7, 11, and 2 cases, respectively. Conclusion: The selection of local perforator flaps to correct breast defects after conservative surgery, using preoperative color Doppler ultrasound to identify the vascular pedicle and a specific algorithm, allowed us to obtain satisfactory aesthetic results without the need for alloplastic elements or subsequent revisions.

A bibliometric worldview of breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer from 2013 to 2023.

Over the last decade, significant advancements have been made in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for breast cancer. However, there is a lack of analytical and descriptive investigations on the trajectory, essential research directions, current research scenario, pivotal investigative focuses, and forthcoming perspectives. The objective of this research is to provide a thorough update on the progress made in BCS for breast cancer over the preceding decade. Retrieved from the Web of Science database, the data span from January 1, 2013, to November 30, 2023. Utilizing a set of advanced analytical instruments, we conducted comprehensive bibliometric and visual analyses. The findings underscore the predominant influence of the USA, representing 35.77% of the overall publications and playing a pivotal role in shaping research within this field. Notable productivity was evident at various institutions, including the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, and the University of Toronto. Annals of Surgical Oncology contributed the most publications in this field. An examination of keywords indicated a change in the concentration of research attention, transitioning from molecular subtype, ultrasonography, and intraoperative aspects to SEER, male breast cancer, and adjuvant measures. By offering a comprehensive bibliometric assessment, this study enhances our understanding of BCS for breast cancer. Consequently, this benefits both experienced researchers and newcomers alike, providing prompt access to essential information and fostering the extraction of innovative concepts within this specific field.

Breast-Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer

Breast-Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer

The top 100 most cited manuscripts in breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer: a bibliometric analysis

The top 100 most cited manuscripts in breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer: a bibliometric analysis

ASO Visual Abstract: Effect of Delayed Oncoplastic Reduction Mammoplasty on Radiation Treatment Delay Following Breast-Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer.

ASO Visual Abstract: Effect of Delayed Oncoplastic Reduction Mammoplasty on Radiation Treatment Delay Following Breast-Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer.

Effect of Delayed Oncoplastic Reduction Mammoplasty on Radiation Treatment Delay Following Breast-Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the delay in initiating adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in patients with early-stage breast cancer who underwent oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty (ORM) following BCS compared with a matched cohort of patients who did not undergo ORM between BCS and RT. Medical records of 112 women (56 ORMs and 56 matched non-ORMs) with carcinoma in situ or early-stage breast cancer treated with BCS were reviewed. ORM was performed in a delayed manner following BCS, allowing confirmation of negative surgical margins. Time to RT was defined as time from last oncologic surgery to start of RT. The median follow-up time was 6.8 years for the ORM cohort and 6.7 years for the control non-ORM cohort. Patients who underwent ORM following BCS experienced a significant delay in initiating RT (>8 weeks) than matched patients not undergoing ORM (66% vs. 34%; p<0.001). Wound complications occurred in 44.6% (n=25) of patients in the ORM cohort, which were mostly minor, including delayed wound healing and/or infection (39%). There was no significant difference in local recurrence between patients in the non-ORM and ORM cohorts (p=0.32). This study demonstrates that ORM following BCS has the potential to delay RT >8 weeks, largely as a result of increased risk of wound complications; however, this delay did not impact local control. ORM can be safely considered for appropriately selected patients with breast cancer.

Radiotherapy refusal in breast cancer with breast-conserving surgery

BackgroundAlthough radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery has been the standard treatment for breast cancer, some people still refuse to undergo radiotherapy. The aim of this study is to identify risk factors for refusal of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery.MethodsTo investigate the trend of refusing radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery in patients with breast cancer using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The patients were divided into radiotherapy group and radiotherapy refusal group. Survival results were compared using a multivariate Cox risk model adjusted for clinicopathological variables. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of patients refusing radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery and a nomogram model was established.ResultsThe study included 87,100 women who underwent breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer between 2010 and 2015. There were 84,948 patients (97.5%) in the radiotherapy group and 2152 patients (2.5%) in the radiotherapy refusal group. The proportion of patients who refused radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery increased from 2.1% in 2010 to 3.1% in 2015. The Kaplan–Meier survival curve showed that radiotherapy can improve overall survival (p < 0.001) and breast cancer specific survival (p < 0.001) in the patients with breast-conserving surgery. The results of multivariate logistic regression showed that age, income, marital status, race, grade, stage, subtype and chemotherapy were independent factors associated with the refusal of radiotherapy.ConclusionsPostoperative radiotherapy can improve the benefits of breast-conserving surgery. Patients with old age, low income, divorce, white race, advanced stage, and no chemotherapy were more likely to refuse radiotherapy.

¿Cuál es el fraccionamiento estándar en la irradiación del cáncer de mama?

Radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer (BC) has been shown to reduce local recurrence rates and mortality. The conventional treatment of postoperative radiotherapy was 50 to 50.4 Gy, administered in 25 to 28 fractions over a period of 5 to 6 weeks. In the last 20 years, there is clinical evidence to consider hypofractionated treatment regimens safe and effective. Moderate hypofractionation, administered over 3 weeks, can be considered the standard of care after conservative surgery or mastectomy, as well as in irradiation of lymph node areas, with similar results regarding local control and survival and with effects on acute and chronic normal tissue. , similar or smaller. Ultrahypofractionated treatment, administered in 5 sessions, for 1 or 5 weeks, is a safe and effective treatment after conservative surgery and mastectomy without reconstruction. Early results have been reported that ultrahypofractionated treatment in 1 week is safe when lymph node areas are irradiated.

Intraoperative evaluation of the resection margin with the usage of digital two-point sectorography (Faxitron PathVision)

Background. Surgery is fundamental in complex and combined approach in the treatment of the early breast cancer. It is a common fact, that absence of tumor cells in the resection margin is the main indicator of oncological safety of the breast-conserving surgery (BCS). The presence of tumor cells in examined margin is the predictor of local recurrence after BCS for breast cancer. Currently the clinical need for precise and fast method of intraoperative assessment of the resection margin status is kept. Intraoperative evaluation of the resection margin with the usage of digital two-point sectorography (Faxitron PathVision) appeared as the alternative to intraoperative histological examination, providing the optimum size of the information about adequacy of the carried out surgical treatment.Aim. To evaluate diagnostic features of the digital two-point sectorography Faxitron PathVision in the intraoperative assessment of the resection margin status after the surgical treatment in comparison with planned histologic examination.Materials and methods. 368 conducted conservative surgeries were analyzed; patients were divided in two groups depending on neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The first group of patients included 236 patients, who didn't receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery; second group included 132 patients, who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Subset analysis of detection rate of the positive resection margin (R1) was carried out with the usage of the intraoperative assessment of the resection margin on the X-ray device Faxitron PathVision or without this method. After each BCS resection margin status was assessed on planned histologic examination for the presence of the tumor cells, with subsequent analysis of the frequency of reoperations when R1 was found.Results. In 368 tested surgical specimens after BCS R1 was found in 25 cases, which is 6.8 %. From 236 patients in the first group after BCS R1 was found in 20 cases, which is 8.5 %; from 132 conducted operations in the second group in 5 (3.8 %) cases the presence of R1 is found. Reoperations were performed in 13 cases and tumor cells were found in 3 cases in the sub-group which didn't receive intraoperative assessment with X-ray device Faxitron PathVision.Conclusions. Assessing the results of our study we can make a conclusion about the positive experience of performing BCS and intraoperative evaluation of the resection margin with the usage of the digital two-point sectorography (Faxitron PathVision) and low frequency of R1 (3.8 %) in comparison with absence of this method (8.5 %).

Simple recommendation for cases requiring re-excision on breast surgery

Breast cancer is an important health problem that especially affects women. In breast cancer where surgical procedures are the primary treatment modality, breast-conserving surgery with radiotherapy is becoming more popular than mastectomy. Re-excision may be necessary in cases of recurrence or positive surgical margins. Damage to the cavity formed due to scar formation in the old operation lodge may make dissection difficult. Failure to see the dissection plan clearly may result in incomplete surgery or removal of excess tissue. We present how we macroscopically removed the lesion with clear margins with a simple technique we performed during surgery in a patient who underwent breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer and presented with suspicion of recurrence.

Ultrasound-assisted carbon nanoparticle labeling of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has gradually become an important means of breast cancer treatment; however, tumor regression following chemotherapy remains a concern. This study was conducted to investigate the effect of ultrasound-assisted carbon nanoparticle labeling in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer. This was a prospective clinical trial study (clinical registration number: ChiCTR-OOC-15006844). Sixty-eight breast cancer patients confirmed by biopsy between July 2015 and January 2017 were randomly selected from the clinical data. Of these, 32 patients were screened for neoadjuvant chemotherapy, forming a consecutive, random series. An ultrasound-guided carbon nanotube was used to mark the original tumor, and sentinel lymph node biopsies were performed. After 4-6 cycles of standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 26 patients were selected for breast-conserving surgery. The feasibility and validity of carbon nanoparticle labeling were analyzed through the negative rate of incision margin, the volume of resected tumors, the detection rate of black-stained sentinel lymph nodes, the recurrence rate of ipsilateral breast, and postoperative survival. In all, 32 patients underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy, 29 cases were detected (90.6%), the false-negative rate was 3.8% (1/26), and 0-4 sentinel lymph nodes (mean 1.8±1.1) were detected. A total of 26 patients underwent breast-conserving surgery, 5 underwent secondary excision, and 1 underwent subcutaneous adenectomy due to a positive margin. The minimum margin between the resected site and the infiltrated part was 1.0-2.1 cm (1.3±0.3 cm). The diameter of resected tumors ranged from 2.2 to 4.5 cm (3.1±0.6 cm). No recurrence or distant metastasis of ipsilateral breast tumors was observed during follow-up (the median follow-up time was 9 months). Ultrasound-assisted carbon nanoparticle labeling is effective for sentinel lymph node tracing before neoadjuvant chemotherapy and has a high detection rate for metastatic lymph nodes. During breast-conserving surgery, it can determine the extent of tumor resection to achieve precision surgical treatment.

Abstract P1-09-03: Impact of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and prognosis following breast-conserving surgery

Abstract Background The risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) and the prognostic outcome of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant (BRCA1/2+) carriers remain controversial. We examined differences in IBTR and prognosis between BRCA1/2+ carriers and non-carriers following BCS for breast cancer. Methods Clinical and pathological data were collected by retrospectively reviewing charts of consecutive patients with stage 0-III breast cancer who underwent genetic testing for germline BRCA1/2 and BCS between 1996 and 2020. Patients with variants of breast cancer-associated genes other than BRCA1/2 were excluded. We compared the incidence of IBTR and prognosis, including overall survival (OS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), between BRCA1/2+ carriers and non-carriers. Results We analyzed 551 patients (587 breasts with cancer), including 30 BRCA1+ carriers (32 breasts) and 31 BRCA2+ carriers (32 breasts). The median follow-up was 5.8 years (7.2 and 5.3 years for carriers and non-carriers, respectively). The median age at breast cancer diagnosis was 43 and 46 years for carriers and non-carriers, respectively, indicating younger onset of cancer in carriers (age ≤ 40 years; 46.9% for carriers vs. 27.5% for non-carriers, p = 0.001). In carriers, breast cancer more frequently expressed estrogen receptor-negative (56.2% for BRCA1+ carriers and 15.6% for BRCA2+ carriers vs. 22.0% for non-carriers, p = 0.013), progesterone receptor-negative (62.5% for BRCA1+ carriers and 31.3% for BRCA2+ carriers vs. 29.5%, p = 0.005), nuclear grade III (45.3% for carriers vs. 29.5% for non-carriers, p = 0.010), or a higher Ki-67 index (Ki-67 index &amp;gt; 20) (89.5% vs. 61.8%, p = 0.001) than non-carriers. Moreover, carriers underwent chemotherapy more frequently than non-carriers (62.5% vs. 42.4%, p = 0.002). Cancer stage, tumor size, HER2 status, presence of lymphovascular invasion, and the rate of positive or close surgical margins did not statistically differ between the examined groups. No statistical differences were detected in the number of patients who underwent whole-breast radiotherapy following BCS: 59 breasts in carriers and 503 in non-carriers (92.2% vs. 96.4%). During follow-up, we noted that 9 breasts of BRCA1/2+ carriers (5 [15.6%] for BRCA1+ and 4 [12.5%] for BRCA2+) and 35 breasts (6.7%) of non-carriers developed IBTR (p = 0.035). In an analysis excluding patients who did not undergo radiotherapy, the rate of IBTR remained significantly higher in BRCA1/2+ carriers (p = 0.034) than that in non-carriers. The median time to IBTR was 10.2 years in carriers (10.2 years for BRCA1+ and 8.5 years for BRCA2+) and 3.5 years in non-carriers. Carriers were more likely than non-carriers to exhibit distinct subtypes of recurrent tumors in the ipsilateral breast (66.7% for carriers vs. 19.4% for non-carriers, p = 0.006), occurring in a different quadrant from the primary tumor (50.0% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.215). No significant differences in OS (p = 0.068), BCSS (p = 0.109), or DRFS (p = 0.359) were noted between carriers and non-carriers. Conclusion BRCA1/2+ carriers exhibited a higher risk of IBTR after BCS and a longer time to IBTR than non-carriers. One limitation of the present study is a longer follow-up period for carriers than for non-carriers, as carriers typically underwent long-term observation at our institution; hence, further data accumulation is warranted for validating these findings. Subtypes and quadrants of IBTR were frequently distinct in carriers, indicating the increased incidence of new primary breast cancer. Although the prognosis did not differ between carriers and non-carriers, our results suggest the necessity for long-term intensive breast surveillance of BRCA1/2+ carriers after BCS. Citation Format: Sakiko Kondo, Kumiko Kida, Misato Suzuki, Chika Fukano, Atsushi Yoshida, Naoki Hayashi, Junko Takei, Michiko Yamanaka, Hideko Yamauchi. Impact of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and prognosis following breast-conserving surgery [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-09-03.

Application of near-infrared fluorescence imaging in the accurate assessment of surgical margins during breast-conserving surgery

ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of near-infrared fluorescence imaging technology for assessing margins during breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer.MethodsForty-three breast cancer patients who received surgical treatment at Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College were selected. Before the operation, the patients were administered with an indocyanine green injection of 0.5 mg/kg intravenously 2 h before operation. During and after the operation, all patients underwent surgical margin monitoring with the near-infrared fluorescence imaging system for fluorescence imaging and acquisition of images and quantitative fluorescence intensity. During the operation, the patients’ tissue specimens were collected on the upper, lower, inner, outer, apical, and basal sides of the fluorescence boundary of the isolated lesions for pathological examination.ResultsFluorescence was detected in the primary tumor in all patients. The average fluorescence intensities of tumor tissue, peritumoral tissue, and normal tissue were 219.41 ± 32.81, 143.35 ± 17.37, and 105.77 ± 17.79 arbitrary units, respectively (P < 0.05, t test). The signal-to-background ratio of tumor to peritumor tissue and normal tissue was 1.54 ± 0.20 and 2.14 ± 0.60, respectively (P < 0.05, t test). Abnormal indocyanine green fluorescence was detected in 11.6% patients (5/43), including 3 patients with residual infiltrating carcinoma and 2 patients with adenosis with ductal dilatation.ConclusionThis study confirms the high sensitivity and specificity of near-infrared fluorescence imaging technology for breast-conserving surgery margin assessment. Near-infrared fluorescence imaging technology can be used as an intraoperative diagnosis and treatment tool to accurately determine the surgical margin and is of important guiding value in breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer.

Rate of effect of surgical margins after breast conserving surgery and estimation of direct costs

ObjectiveAssessment of the reoperation rate in patients with positive resection margins after initial breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer and estimation of the cost to the hospital. Method146 patients with diagnosis of invasive breast cancer were included, who were initially intervened with conservative surgery by the Gynecology and Obstetrics Service of Hospital Universitario de Tarragona Juan XXIII (HUTJ23) during the years 2018 and 2019. We calculated the rate of involvement of the surgical margins of the resection piece after initial conservative surgery, establishing in which cases it was necessary to carry out a second resection, estimating the added direct costs of the second surgical procedure, and comparing them with the costs established by the Catalan Health Service according to the level of the hospital and the Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRG) established by the National Health System. ResultsThe rate of positive margins after initial conservative surgery was 20.55% and 19.17% patients underwent reoperation, generating a total expense of € 129,696.89, € 82,654.34 in conservative surgeries (€ 3757.01 on average per patient) and € 47,042.55 in mastectomies (€ 6720.36 on average per patient). ConclusionsMargin involvement after breast-conserving surgery is synonymous for reoperation, this involves a series of direct costs. It is advisable to control the factors related to affected margins to minimize their impact.

A Statewide Approach to Reducing Re-excision Rates for Women With Breast-conserving Surgery.

Test the effectiveness of benchmarked performance reports based on existing discharge data paired with a statewide intervention to implement evidence-based strategies on breast re-excision rates. Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is a common breast cancer surgery performed in a range of hospital settings. Studies have demonstrated variations in post-BCS re-excision rates, identifying it as a high-value improvement target. Wisconsin Hospital Association discharge data (2017-2019) were used to compare 60-day re-excision rates following BCS for breast cancer. The analysis estimated the difference in the average change preintervention to postintervention between Surgical Collaborative of Wisconsin (SCW) and nonparticipating hospitals using a logistic mixed-effects model with repeated measures, adjusting for age, payer, and hospital volume, including hospitals as random effects. The intervention included 5 collaborative meetings in 2018 to 2019 where surgeon champions shared guideline updates, best practices/challenges, and facilitated action planning. Confidential benchmarked performance reports were provided. In 2017, there were 3692 breast procedures in SCW and 1279 in nonparticipating hospitals; hospital-level re-excision rates ranged from 5% to >50%. There was no statistically significant baseline difference in re-excision rates between SCW and nonparticipating hospitals (16.1% vs. 17.1%, P =0.47). Re-excision significantly decreased for SCW but not for nonparticipating hospitals (odds ratio=0.69, 95% confidence interval=0.52-0.91). Benchmarked performance reports and collaborative quality improvement can decrease post-BCS re-excisions, increase quality, and decrease costs. Our study demonstrates the effective use of administrative data as a platform for statewide quality collaboratives. Using existing data requires fewer resources and offers a new paradigm that promotes participation across practice settings.