Breast-conserving Treatment Research Articles

Breast Cancer and Mental Health: Incidence and Influencing Factors-A Claims Data Analysis from Germany.

With breast cancer (BC) survival improving due to optimized therapy, enhancing quality of life has become increasingly important. Both diagnosis and treatment, with their potential side effects, pose risks to mental well-being. Our study aimed to analyze the incidence and potential risk factors for mental disorders in BC patients. This retrospective analysis used claims data from AOK Baden-Wuerttemberg, including 11,553 BC patients diagnosed via ICD code C50 between 2010 and 2020 and 31,944 age-matched controls. Patients with mental disorders in the 12 months prior to diagnosis were excluded. Mental disorders were categorized into eight groups based on ICD codes: anxiety, obsessive compulsive disorder, adjustment disorder, dissociative disorder, hypochondriac disorder, affective disorder, mania, and other neuroses. Mental disorders were significantly more common in BC patients than in controls (64.2% vs. 38.1%, p < 0.01, OR 2.91, 95%CI [2.79, 3.04]). In particular, hypochondriac, anxiety, affective, and adjustment disorders occurred significantly more often in BC patients. No differences were found for mania, bipolar disease, other neuroses, obsessive compulsive-, or dissociative disorders. Furthermore, endocrine therapy was associated with psychological comorbidities (OR 1.69, p < 0.001, 95%CI [1.53, 1.86]), while primarily metastasized patients (stage C) had a lower risk than adjuvant patients in stage A (OR 0.55, p < 0.0001, 95%CI [0.49, 0.61]). Regarding surgical treatment, mastectomy patients showed lower rates of mental illnesses (61.2%) than those with breast-conserving treatment (71.6%), or especially breast reconstruction (78.4%, p < 0.01). Breast reconstruction was also associated with more hypochondriac (p < 0.01) and adjustment disorders (p < 0.01). So, BC patients experience significantly more mental disorders than controls, particularly when treated with endocrine therapy and breast reconstructive surgery.

Finnish translation, validation, and reproducibility of BREAST-Q modules relevant to breast cancer treatment

Background and objective: Breast cancer and its treatments can have a marked impact on the patient health-related quality of life. The aim of this study was to produce and validate Finnish versions of the breast-conserving treatment, mastectomy and breast reconstruction modules of the BREAST-Q, a patient-reported outcome tool designed specifically for women undergoing treatment for breast cancer. Methods: The relevant BREAST-Q modules were translated to Finnish according to established guidelines. Altogether 777 preoperative women were recruited at the Breast Surgery Unit and the Plastic Surgery Unit of Helsinki University Hospital between December 2019 and March 2021. This included 541 patients scheduled for breast-conserving surgery, 86 for mastectomy, and 150 for breast reconstruction. Postoperative patients were recruited through a postal survey, approaching 500 women operated for breast cancer in 2017, including 250 women who had undergone breast-conserving surgery and 250 women who had undergone mastectomy, as well as 339 women who had undergone breast reconstruction between August 2017 and July 2019. The patients were invited to fill the BREAST-Q modules relevant to their treatment and the general health-related quality-of-life instrument SF-36. A repeat administration of the BREAST-Q was done 2 weeks later. Results: A total of 665 (41%) women participated in the study, 339 (44%) preoperatively and 326 (39%) postoperatively. The BREAST-Q subscales showed high internal consistency with most Cronbach’s alphas &gt; 0.8. The repeatability of the subscales was excellent with most intra-class correlation coefficients &gt; 0.75. Low or negligible correlation was observed between BREAST-Q subscales and SF-36 domains. Conclusions: The Finnish version of the BREAST-Q modules breast-conserving treatment, mastectomy, and breast reconstruction performs well in assessing the health-related quality of life of women undergoing surgery for breast cancer or breast reconstruction.

Omission of axillary surgery in cN0, postmenopausal ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving treatment.

Previous clinical trials have diminished the significance of lymph node (LN) metastasis and axillary surgery in breast cancer, particularly in cN0, postmenopausal estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative patients undergoing breast-conserving treatment (BCT). We assessed the replacement of axillary surgery with preoperative imaging modalities by analyzing the proportion of high nodal burden (HNB) patients with ≥3 LN metastases in these patients. We retrospectively identified 333 cN0, postmenopausal ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer patients who underwent BCT in two hospitals between January 2003 and December 2017. The proportion of LN metastasis patients and the number of metastatic LN were investigated. Risk factors of LN metastasis were analyzed and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was compared. Axillary surgery confirmed LN metastasis in 81 (24.3%) of the cN0 patients. The clinical tumor size (cT) and age were factors associated with LN metastasis [cT: odds ratio (OR), 2.92, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.69-5.05, P<0.001; age: OR, 0.33, 95% CI: 0.11-0.99, P=0.048]. However, HNB patients with ≥3 LN metastases were 15 (4.5%) of all the patients. There was statistically significant difference in the incidence of HNB between patients with cT1 tumors (3.6%) and those with cT2 tumors (7.4%) (P<0.001). In cN0, postmenopausal ER-positive/HER2-negative patients who underwent BCT, patients with cT1 tumors had lower rate of LN metastasis, and there were fewer instances of HNB. Therefore, in these patients, omission of axillary surgery including SLNB can be carefully considered.

Breast Reconstruction: The Oncoplastic Approach.

Breast reconstruction surgery is continualladvancing, significantly enhancing patient well-being. Current surgical techniques prioritize minimizing donor site morbidity while achieving a more natural breast appearance. Increasing patient preferences for avoiding prosthetic materials in reconstruction, along with advancements in oncological safety and heightened aesthetic expectations, are driving the exploration and development of innovative approaches. Today's reconstructive options range from straightforward oncoplastic glandular remodeling to intricate microsurgical procedures. This narrative review, titled "Breast reconstruction: the oncoplastic approach," provides a comprehensive overview of contemporary trends in breast-conserving treatment. It evaluates the indications for these techniques and offers guidance to plastic surgeons in crafting personalized treatment plans. This approach presents a valuable single-stage alternative or adjunct to traditional prosthetic or microsurgical reconstruction methods.

Preoperative three-dimensional simulation of the breast appearance after wide local excision or level one oncoplastic techniques for breast-conserving treatment does not set unrealistic expectations for aesthetic outcome: One-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial

IntroductionSimulation of aesthetic outcomes of wide local excision and level one oncoplastic breast conserving treatment (BCT) using 3-dimensional surface imaging (3D-SI) prepares women for their aesthetic outcome. It remains unknown whether women’s memory of this information at the one-year follow-up matches their perception of reality or affects the quality of life. MethodsWith ethical approval, a prospective 3-arm RCT was conducted and it included 3D-simulation, viewing post-operative 2D photographs of other women and standard care. At one-year post-surgery, the participants completed a visual analogue scale (VAS) for the question “How well do you think the information about how your breasts are likely to look after surgery reflects how they actually look today?” and the BCT BREAST-Q module. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to examine between-group differences at a 5% significance level. ResultsFrom 2017 to 2019, 117 women completed the primary endpoint of being informed about the aesthetic outcome via verbal description, photographs or simulation. Seventy-eight (74%) of the 106 women who remained eligible attended the one-year follow-up. The standardised preoperative 3D-SI simulation did not affect the patient’s perception of the aesthetic outcome compared to standard care or viewing 2D photographs as measured using the VAS (p = 0.40) or BREAST-Q scores for satisfaction with information (p = 0.76), satisfaction with breasts (p = 0.70), and psychosocial wellbeing domains (p = 0.81). DiscussionViewing their own 3D-SI standardised simulation did not significantly affect how the participants perceived their aesthetic outcome. In addition, it did not alter the patient-reported satisfaction. These results demonstrated that simulation for wide local excision or level one oncoplastic surgery does not set unrealistic expectations of the aesthetic outcome when used in a preoperative setting. SynopsisThe use of a non-bespoke three-dimensional simulation of the aesthetic outcome for breast conserving treatment in the preoperative setting does not over-inflate expectations compared to standard care.

Factors that may contribute to non-radical resections in patients undergoing breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer

Factors that may contribute to non-radical resections in patients undergoing breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer

Evaluating the Margins of Breast Cancer Tumors by Using Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Deep Learning: A Preliminary Assessment.

The assessment information of tumor margins is extremely important for the success of the breast cancer surgery and whether the patient undergoes a second operation. However, conducting surgical margin assessments is a time-consuming task that requires pathology-related skills and equipment, and often cannot be provided in a timely manner. To address this challenge, digital breast tomosynthesis technology was utilized to generate detailed cross-sectional images of the breast tissue and integrate deep learning algorithms for image segmentation, achieving an assessment of tumor margins during surgery. this study utilized post-operative tissue samples from 46 patients who underwent breast-conserving treatment, and generated image sets using digital breast tomosynthesis for the training and evaluation of deep learning models. Deep learning algorithms effectively identifying the tumor area. They achieved a Mean Intersection over Union (MIoU) of 0.91, global accuracy of 99%, weighted IoU of 44%, precision of 98%, recall of 83%, F1 score of 89%, and dice coefficient of 93% on the training dataset; for the testing dataset, MIoU was at 83%, global accuracy at 97%, weighted IoU at 38%, precision at 87%, recall rate at 69%, F1 score at 76%, dice coefficient at 86%. The initial evaluation suggests that the deep learning-based image segmentation method is highly accurate in measuring breast tumor margins. This helps provide information related to tumor margins during surgery, and by using different datasets, this research method can also be applied to the surgical margin assessment of various types of tumors.

Abstract PO1-07-07: Radiomics features for distinguishing true recurrence versus new primary tumor following breast-conserving treatment

Abstract Background Despite modern surgical and irradiation techniques, ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) accounts for 5-15% of all cancer recurrences in women treated with breast conservative treatment. Historically, the methods to define true recurrence (TR) and new primary tumor (NP) for IBTR mainly rely on clinical and pathological criteria, limiting the accuracy of the discerption and causing misclassification. This study aimed to develop a preoperative, noninvasive model for distinguishing IBTR by integrating clinicopathological review with paired dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) at diagnosis and following in-breast recurrence. MethodsWe retrospectively extracted radiomics features from MRI to develop a radiomic cohort of IBTR (n =46), among which all patients underwent paired preoperative DCE-MRI. This radiomic cohort was divided into a training cohort (n =27) and a validation cohort (n =19) with stratified random sampling. Classification of IBTR as TR or NP on the basis of tumor location, histologic subtype, estrogen receptor, and HER2 status was set as the gold standard. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and logistic regression were utilized to perform radiomics feature selection and model training, respectively. The clinical utility of the model was determined via decision curve analysis (DCA). Results We selected three radiomics features (first-order feature Kurtosis from the first postcontrast phase on IBTR DCE-MRI, GLCM feature Imc2 from the first postcontrast phase on IBTR DCE-MRI, and the delta feature Correlation from the precontrast phase of the change between IBTR and primary tumor DCE-MRI) to develop an IBTR-classification predicting radiomic model, which performed well in the validation cohort (AUC 0.867, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.694-1). Further investigation for sensitivity (73.3%) and specificity (100%) verified a favorable concordance between the radiomic classification and the conventional standard, with a diagnostic accuracy of 79%. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated the feasibility of the radiomics model in predicting IBTR classification and provided preoperative information about the nature of “recurrence”. This might have important implications in surgical approaches and multidisciplinary care for IBTR. Further efforts are needed to improve the reproducibility of radiomics features and models in multiple centers. Citation Format: Feilin Qu, Guan-Hua Su, Jin-Hui Li, Chao You, Zhi-Ming Shao. Radiomics features for distinguishing true recurrence versus new primary tumor following breast-conserving treatment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-07-07.

Oncoplastic reconstruction with breast-conserving treatment versus breast-conserving treatment alone in the elderly.

Oncoplastic reconstruction (IOR) performed in conjunction with breast conserving therapy(BCT) has been found to improve psychosocial well-being, reduce hospitalization time, and reduce cost burden. Few studies have looked at the safety profile, complication rates, and overall outcomes in patients ages 65 years and older undergoing IOR versus BCT alone. A retrospective, cross-sectional, single-institution medical record review was conducted of women diagnosed with breast cancer age 65 years or older who received IOR or BCT alone. Demographics, clinical data, and major and minor complication profiles were compared between cohorts. A total of 310 patients were included. Of these, 126 received IOR, while 184 received BCT alone. Age >85 was found to have a significantly higher risk for any complication and was an independent predictor for experiencing any complication (OR: 8.5, p = 0.015; OR: 1.06, p = 0.029). Major complication rates were significantly higher in the BCT cohort (16.9% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.023). IOR in the elderly is a safe option and was not found to be a predictor of experiencing higher complications. Patients who are 85 years and older had a higher risk of complications, and future studies may explore risk-benefit in that particular cohort of patients in which BCT is planned.

Comparison of clinical characteristics between ACOSOG Z0011-eligible cohort and sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer patients in Hong Kong.

The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 trial resulted in de-escalation of axillary surgery among early-stage breast cancer patients with low-volume sentinel lymph node (SLN) disease undergoing breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy. Nevertheless, the mastectomy rate in the Chinese population remains high. This study compared the clinical characteristics of the ACOSOG Z0011-eligible cohort with SLN-positive breast cancer patients in Hong Kong. This retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database at a university-affiliated breast cancer centre in Hong Kong was performed from June 2014 to May 2019. The database included all patients with clinical tumour (T) stage T1 or T2 invasive breast carcinoma, no palpable adenopathy, one or two positive SLNs on histological examination, and no prior neoadjuvant systemic treatment. Comparisons were made between the mastectomy and breast-conserving treatment groups in our cohort, along with the sentinel-alone arm in the ACOSOG Z0011 trial. One hundred and seventy-one patients met the inclusion criteria: 112 underwent mastectomy and 59 underwent breast-conserving treatment. Our mastectomy group had higher prevalences of T2 tumours (P<0.001), lymphovascular invasion (P<0.001), and SLN macrometastases (P=0.004) compared with the ACOSOG Z0011 cohort. However, in our patient population, mean pathological size slightly differed between the mastectomy and breast-conserving treatment groups (2.2 cm vs 1.8 cm; P=0.005). Other histopathological features were similar. This study demonstrated that clinicopathological features were comparable between SLN-positive breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy and those undergoing breast-conserving treatment. Low-risk SLN-positive mastectomy patients may safely avoid completion axillary lymph node dissection.

Brachytherapy in Breast Cancer Treatment: Physical and Biological Aspects

This scientific paper focuses on the treatment of breast cancer, one of the most common cancers among women. Despite increased awareness and the popularity of screening tests, statistics indicate a significant rise in incidence. The paper presents breast-conserving treatment methods, including brachytherapy, as a modern technique with promising outcomes. It describes the physical properties of ionizing radiation used in brachytherapy, discussing the photoelectric effect, Compton effect, and the phenomenon of pair production.&#x0D; The paper then delves into the biological effects of ionizing radiation, emphasizing the dependence on the cell cycle phase. It highlights lethal, sublethal, and potentially lethal cellular damage, categorizing the effects of radiation interaction into early and late responses.&#x0D; The discussion transitions to the application of brachytherapy in breast cancer treatment, focusing on various techniques such as LDR, PDR, and HDR. The paper provides a detailed description of brachytherapy's use in breast-conserving treatment, considering contraindications, treatment planning, and Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI) techniques.&#x0D; The radioisotopes used in brachytherapy are also presented, with special attention to Iridium-192. The physical and practical aspects related to this isotope are discussed, along with other commonly used radioisotopes such as Cesium-137, Cobalt-60, and Strontium-90.&#x0D; The paper concludes with a summary, emphasizing the significance of brachytherapy in breast cancer treatment and outlining its prospects for development. The authors highlight precision and shortened therapy duration.

Radiation-induced cutaneous vasculopathy of the breast: a rare case report

BackgroundRadiation therapy is often indicated as part of the treatment for breast cancer and is therefore used frequently worldwide. Vasculopathy is a general term used to describe any condition that affects blood vessels. We present a case report of a patient who presented with vasculopathy as a rare late side effect of radiation therapy to the breast.Case presentationThis 66-year-old woman was initially treated with breast-conserving surgery for early-stage receptor-positive left breast carcinoma. She received postoperative radiation therapy and hormonal treatment with tamoxifen. She developed sudden spontaneous painless ecchymosis spread over the whole irradiated area 1.5 years after finishing her radiation therapy. Tumor relapse was excluded. There was no associated vasculitis. The cause was presumed to be multifactorial. She had a history of smoking and was known to have hyperlipidemia. She had undergone several surgical treatments at the left breast one year after her initial breast-conserving treatment and was taking tamoxifen. Anti-inflammatory medicine and treatments increasing local blood flow were prescribed. The ecchymosis resolved completely within one month.ConclusionsVasculopathy can occur as a rare late side effect of radiation therapy. It can be reversible. Prevention begins with carefully treating precipitating factors.

Evaluation of upper limb lymphoedema and diagnostic accuracy of bioimpedance spectroscopy. A comprehensive validation in a Brazilian population.

This is a prospective, cross-sectional study of a convenience sample of 462 women who underwent surgical treatment for breast cancer (mastectomy or breast-conserving treatment). The validity, agreement and accuracy were performed comparing BIS (lymphoedema index (L-DEX) ≥ 6.5 or 10) with volumetry by water displacement, which is the gold standard for evaluating lymphoedema. Receiver operating characteristic curve was performed. Additionally, other methods like perimetry and indirect volumetry of the upper limbs were compared with water displacement volumetry (direct volumetry), and the BIS were compared with subjective evaluation. Considering L-DEX ≥ 10 the sensitivity of the BIS was 44.1%, specificity 95.4%, positive predictive value (PPV) was 70.7%, negative predictive value (NPV) was 87% and kappa was 0.459. The BIS with L-DEX ≥ 6.5, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and kappa were 57%, 88.5%, 55.8%, 89% and 0.452, respectively. Area under curve was 0.724 and a possible cut-off point of L-DEX ≥ 7.35 with sensitivity of 57%, specificity of 90.7% and kappa value = 0.489. Although BIS was significantly associated with the subjective evaluation of lymphoedema, it showed low sensitivity and agreement and moderate correlation when used as a method for diagnosing the condition. Thus, it is not the most valid method for evaluating lymphoedema. In addition, it was not the most accurate method when compared with other objective evaluation tools. Public health resources are scarce and must be used consciously. The knowledge that BIS is not a more accurate method than other, lower-cost instruments allows for better targeting of these resources.

Breast lymphedema following breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer: current status and future directions.

To examine the current evidence on breast lymphedema (BL) diagnosis and treatment after breast-conserving surgery, identify gaps in the literature, and propose future research directions. A comprehensive literature review was conducted using Ovid, PubMed, and Cochrane, including studies published between 2000 and 2023. References were reviewed manually for eligible studies. Inclusion criteria were as follows: patients who underwent breast conserving treatment (surgery ± radiation) for breast cancer, goals of the paper included analyzing or reviewing BL measurement with ultrasound or tissue dielectric constant, or BL treatment. Twenty-seven manuscripts were included in the review. There is variation in incidence, time course, and risk factors for BL. Risk factors for BL included breast size, primary and axillary surgery extent, radiation, and chemotherapy but require further investigation. Diagnostic methods for BL currently rely on patient report and lack standardized criteria. Tissue dielectric constant (TDC) and ultrasound (US) emerged as promising ambulatory BL assessment tools; however, diagnostic thresholds and validation studies with ICG lymphography are needed to establish clinical utility. The evidence base for treatment of BL is weak, lacking high-quality studies. The natural history of BL is not well defined. TDC and US show promise as ambulatory assessment tools for BL; however, further validation with lymphatic imaging is required. BL treatment is not established in the literature. Longitudinal, prospective studies including pre-radiation measurements and validating with lymphatic imaging are required. These data will inform screening, diagnostic criteria, and evidence-based treatment parameters for patients with BL after breast-conserving surgery and radiation.

Postoperative radiotherapy omission in selected patients with early breast cancer following preoperative breast MRI (PROSPECT): primary results of a prospective two-arm study

Adjuvant breast radiotherapy as a standard component of breast-conserving treatment for early cancer can overtreat many women. Breast MRI is the most sensitive modality to assess local tumour burden. The aim of this study was to determine whether a combination of MRI and pathology findings can identify women with truly localised breast cancer who can safely avoid radiotherapy. PROSPECT is a prospective, multicentre, two-arm, non-randomised trial of radiotherapy omission in patients selected using preoperative MRI and postoperative tumour pathology. It is being conducted at four academic hospitals in Australia. Women aged 50 years or older with cT1N0 non-triple-negative breast cancer were eligible. Those with apparently unifocal cancer had breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and, if pT1N0 or N1mi, had radiotherapy omitted (group 1). Standard treatment including excision of MRI-detected additional cancers was offered to the others (group 2). All were recommended systemic therapy. The primary outcome was ipsilateral invasive recurrence rate (IIRR) at 5 years in group 1. Primary analysis occurred after the 100th group 1 patient reached 5 years follow-up. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and cost-effectiveness of the PROSPECT pathway were analysed. This study is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12610000810011). Between May 17, 2011, and May 6, 2019, 443 patients with breast cancer underwent MRI. Median age was 63·0 years. MRI detected 61 malignant occult lesions separate from the index cancer in 48 patients (11%). Of 201 group 1 patients who had BCS without radiotherapy, the IIRR at 5 years was 1·0% (upper 95% CI 5·4%). In group 1, one local recurrence occurred at 4·5 years and a second at 7·5 years. In group 2, nine patients had mastectomy (2% of total cohort), and the 5-year IIRR was 1·7% (upper 95% CI 6·1%). The only distant metastasis in the entire cohort was genetically distinct from the index cancer. The PROSPECT pathway increased QALYs by 0·019 (95% CI 0·008-0·029) and saved AU$1980 (95% CI 1396-2528) or £953 (672-1216) per patient. PROSPECT suggests that women with unifocal breast cancer on MRI and favourable pathology can safely omit radiotherapy. Breast Cancer Trials, National Breast Cancer Foundation, Cancer Council Victoria, the Royal Melbourne Hospital Foundation, and the Breast Cancer Research Foundation.

Examining the Pathological Diagnostic Impact of Frozen Sections in Breast Cancer

Objective: To analyze the diagnostic value of frozen section pathology in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Methods: A total of 50 patients with breast tumors treated between July 2021 and February 2023 were randomly selected as samples. Both paraffin section and frozen section diagnoses were conducted. The paraffin section results served as the gold standard for evaluating the value of frozen section examination. Results: Among the frozen section diagnoses, 48 cases (96.00%) were confirmed, 1 case was misdiagnosed (2.00%), and 1 case was delayed (2.00%). Among the confirmed patients, 45 cases (90.00%) were entirely consistent, and 3 cases (6.00%) were basically consistent. The diagnostic rate of the frozen section was 96.00%, compared with 100.00% for the paraffin section (P &gt; 0.05). The diagnostic time of the frozen section (35.25 ± 2.11 min) was significantly shorter than that for the paraffin section (6911.36 ± 58.36 min; P &lt; 0.05). Conclusion: Frozen section diagnosis is rapid and demonstrates relatively high diagnostic accuracy. It can guide doctors in determining whether to pursue breast-conserving treatment and aid in selecting appropriate surgical methods. This is beneficial for preventing unnecessary medical interventions and reducing the need for secondary surgeries in breast cancer patients.

Identifying the Variables for Oncoplastic Reconstruction: Preoperative Assessment Tool for Breast Conserving Treatment.

A wide range of surgical techniques has been described for breast conservation treatment (Oncoplasty) based on breast size and shape, as well as tumor size and location. However, there is a lack of standardization regarding the indications for oncoplastic reconstruction. This study aims to identify the presurgical parameters associated with poor cosmetic outcomes post-breast conserving treatment. We hope this preoperative model can assist in evaluating whether there is a need for oncoplastic intervention. The study group involved 136-adult females (age 35-77) who previously undergone breast conserving surgery and radiation, without oncoplastic intervention between 2007 and 2017. Patient demographics, medical and physical parameters were collected, and each patient filled Breast-QTM-questionnaire and six angles' photographs were taken. Patients' photographs were evaluated by 15 board-certified plastic surgeons. Both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify potential confounders for poor outcome in each of the experts' and patients' average-grades. Our analysis identified several variables correlated with poor surgical outcome: high BMI, high chest-wall-circumference, high breast-width and larger volume-removed. The general-aesthetic-result as evaluated by our experts was favorably influenced by an upper lateral quadrant tumor while the breast shape was negatively influenced by a lower medial quadrant tumor. Interestingly, no correlation was found between the patients' and panel's evaluations, nor did we find any clinically significant parameter related to the patients' reported well-being. Patients with high BMI, high chest-wall-circumference, large breast-width and larger inferomedial tumors could benefit from early plastic surgery evaluation and intervention. Patient's psychosocial well-being as well as sexual well-being are independent from positive surgical outcome evaluated by plastic surgeons. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Spectrum of ultrasound findings in patients with history of breast conservative treatment.

Breast conservative treatment (BCT) is currently accepted as the standard treatment option for breast cancer. Targeted ultrasound helps detect recurrent lesions, postoperative changes, and scarring tissue. In this pictorial essay, we review the ultrasound features of benign (seroma, hematoma, fat necrosis, traumatic neuroma, fibrosis/scarring) and malignant (recurrence, new primary cancer) causes of palpable lumps after BCT and provide images from our patients to illustrate some typical findings of common pathologies. Ultrasound, especially as an adjunct to mammography, can make a specific diagnosis in most cases.

Dermoglandular advancement-rotation flap for conservative treatment of breast cancer - description of technique, objective and subjective assessments.

to describe and evaluate the dermoglandular advancement-rotation flap with no contralateral surgery as a technique for the conservative treatment of breast cancer when skin or a large proportion of gland requires resection. 14 patients with breast tumors with a mean size of 4.2cm and need for skin resection. The resection area is included within an isosceles triangle, with its apex located on the areola, which is the pivot for rotation of a dermoglandular flap released through a lateral extension along that triangle base. Symmetry before and after radiotherapy was objectively assessed by authors using the BCCT.core software, as well as subjectively by three experts and patients themselves using the Harvard scale. Experts considered the breast symmetry results to be excellent/good for 85.7% of patients in the early post-operative period and 78.6% in the late post-operative period. Excellent/good ratings provided by BCCT.core software amounted to 78.6% of cases in the early post-operative period and 92.9% in the late post-operative period. Symmetry was rated as excellent/good by 100% of patients. Dermoglandular advancement-rotation flap technique with no contralateral surgery provides good symmetry when a large proportion of skin or gland requires resection on breast conservative cancer treatment.

The unifying concepts of the sick lobe hypothesis, field cancerisation and breast conservation treatment for multiple ipsilateral breast cancers: a narrative review.

In the past, it was conventionally thought that multiple ipsilateral breast cancer (MIBC) was a contraindication to breast conservation surgery, especially if multicentric foci in different quadrants of the breast were present. However, over time, there has been a growing body of evidence in the literature demonstrating no survival detriment or poorer local control with breast conservation for MIBC. There is, however, a paucity of information integrating anatomy, pathology with surgical treatment of MIBC. Understanding mammary anatomy, pathology of the sick lobe hypothesis and molecular impact of field cancerisation contributes significantly to the understanding of the role of surgical treatment of MIBC. The purpose of this narrative overview is to review the paradigm shifts over time in the use of breast conservation treatment (BCT) for MIBC, and how the concepts of the sick lobe hypothesis and field cancerisation interact with this therapeutic strategy. A secondary objective is to explore the feasibility of surgical de-escalation for BCT in the presence of MIBC. A PubMed search was performed for articles relating to BCT, multifocal, multicentric and MIBC. A separate literature search was performed for sick lobe hypothesis and field cancerisation and their interaction for surgical treatment for breast cancer. The available data was then analysed and synergised into a coherent summary of how the molecular and histologic aspects of MIBC interact with surgical therapy. There is a growing body of evidence supporting the use of BCT for MIBC. However, there is scant data connecting the basic science aspects of breast cancer in terms of pathology and genetics to adequacy of surgical extirpation of breast malignancies. This review bridges this gap by demonstrating how information on basic sciences available in contemporary literature can be extrapolated for use in artificial intelligence (AI) systems to assist in BCT for MIBC. This narrative review connects several aspects of the surgical treatment for MIBC: historical perspectives of therapy compared with contemporary philosophy based on clinical evidence, anatomy/pathology (sick lobe hypothesis) and molecular findings (field cancerisation) as potential indicators of adequate surgical resection, and how current technology can be used to forge future AI applications in breast cancer surgery. These form the foundation for future research to safely de-escalate surgery for women with MIBC.