Outcomes In Breast Cancer Survivors Research Articles

Outcomes for breast cancer survivors with metastatic disease in a physical activity program for medically underserved cancer survivors.

This study examined the effectiveness and feasibility of the Active Living After Cancer (ALAC) program for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) survivors. ALAC is a 12-session community-based program to help cancer survivors improve their physical functioning and quality of life through increased physical activity. ALAC participants with MBC (stage IV) were compared to survivors with early-stage breast cancer (stages I and II). The International Physical Activity Questionnaire, Godin Leisure-Time Physical Activity, 30-second sit-to-stand test, and PROMIS Global Health were administered at baseline and follow-up. Program satisfaction and retention were assessed at week 12. Repeated-measures mixed models were used to compare changes in outcomes between survivors with early-stage breast cancer and MBC. A total of 585 women (59.3 y ± 10.6), most of whom were Hispanic (54%) or non-Hispanic Black (22%), were included (early stage, n = 538; MBC, n = 47). After the ALAC program, a significant increase in physical activity (P < 0.001), improved physical and mental health T-scores (P < 0.001), and more sit-to-stand repetitions (P < 0.001) were observed for both survivors with early-stage breast cancer and MBC. Women with MBC showed significantly lower physical health (P = 0.037) and physical function (P = 0.010) compared to early-stage at baseline. The ALAC program increased physical activity and improved health-related quality of life and physical function among breast cancer survivors with both early-stage and metastatic disease. This study emphasizes the importance of incorporating physical activity interventions like the ALAC program into the comprehensive care of cancer survivors, including those with metastatic disease.

Impact of environmental temperature on the survival outcomes of breast cancer: A SEER-based study.

Experimental evidence in tumor-bearing mouse models shows that exposure to cool, that is, sub-thermoneutral environmental temperature is associated with a higher tumor growth rate and an immunosuppressive tumor immune microenvironment than seen at thermoneutral temperatures. However, the translational significance of these findings in humans is unclear. We hypothesized that breast cancer patients living in warmer climates will have better survival outcomes than patients living in colder climates. A retrospective population-based analysis was conducted on 270,496 stage I-III breast cancer patients, who were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) over the period from 1996 to 2017. The average annual temperature (AAT) was calculated based on city level data from the National Centers for Environmental Information. A total of 270, 496 patients were analyzed. Temperature as assessed in quartiles. After adjusting for potential confounders, patients who lived in the 3rd and 4th quartile temperature regions with AAT 56.7-62.5°F (3rd quartile) and > 62.5°F (4th quartile) had a 7% increase in the OS compared to patients living at AAT < 48.5°F (1st quartile) (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.90-0.95 and HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.91-0.96, respectively). For DSS, When comparing AAT quartiles, patients living with AAT in the range of 56.7-62.5°F and > 62.5°F demonstrated a 7% increase each in DSS after adjustment (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.90-0.96 and HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.90-0.96). Higher environmental temperatures are associated with significantly better OS and DSS in breast cancer patients. Future research is warranted to confirm this observation using large datasets to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and investigate novel therapeutic strategies to minimize this geographic disparity in clinical outcomes.

Effect of young age (below 40 years) on oncologic outcomes in Lebanese patients with breast cancer: a matched cohort study

BackgroundDeveloping countries have a significantly higher incidence of breast cancer in patients younger than 40 years as compared to developed countries. This study aimed to examine if young age at diagnosis is an independent prognostic factor for worse survival outcomes in breast cancer as well as the effect of age on Disease-free survival (DFS) and local recurrence free survival (LRFS) after adjusting for various tumor characteristics, local and systemic treatments.MethodsThis is a secondary analysis of prospective cohort of patients from two existing databases. We identified patients with breast cancer aged 40 years or less and we matched them to those older than 40 years. We also matched based on stage and molecular subtypes. In cohort 1, we matched at a ratio of 1:1, while in cohort 2 we matched at a ratio of 1:3.ResultsIn cohort 1, Disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years was significantly shorter for those younger than 40 years (75.6% and 92.7% respectively; p < 0.03). On multivariate analysis, only chemotherapy was found to be significant, while age was not found to be an independent predictor of prognosis. Local recurrence free survival at 5 years was similar between both age categories. Only hormonal therapy is a significant predictor for LRFS at 5 years. In the second cohort, DFS and LRFS at 3 years were similar between those younger and those older than 40 years. On multivariate analysis, no factor including age was found to be an independent predictor of prognosis.ConclusionData in the literature is controversial on the effect of young age on breast cancer prognosis. Our findings could not demonstrate that age is an independent prognostic factor in our population. There is a need for outcomes from larger, prospective series that have longer follow-ups and more data from our region.

Abstract PO1-03-07: Revisiting the potential of pathological complete response as a surrogate for long-term survival outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer at the trial-level

Abstract Background: Pathological complete response (pCR) has been used as a primary endpoint in neoadjuvant clinical trials for non-metastatic breast cancer and as a surrogate endpoint for long-term survival outcomes. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) accepted pCR as a surrogate endpoint for the approval of new drugs in the neoadjuvant setting in high-risk early-stage breast cancer. However, though the Collaborative Trials in Neoadjuvant Breast Cancer (CTNeoBC) pooled analysis in 2014 showed that at the patient level achieving pCR was associated with longer overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS), at the trial-level the association between high pCR rate and better OS and EFS outcomes was weak (coefficient of difference [R2]; 0.03 and 0.24, respectively) among all subtypes of breast cancer. A recent study reported that this association at the trial-level was similarly weak among Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 (HER-2) positive breast cancer (R2; 0.02 and 0.23, respectively). However, the potential surrogacy of pCR rate for OS and EFS in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in the neoadjuvant setting has not been well studied in a comprehensive manner. Moreover, because of significant advances in systemic treatment strategies in TNBC over the past decade including a combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with conventional cytotoxic agents, the trial-level surrogacy needs to be reassessed in recently published neoadjuvant clinical trials for TNBC. Our primary objective is to assess the association between pCR rate and survival outcomes in neoadjuvant clinical trials for TNBC by collecting data from articles published after the CTNeoBC article in 2014. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Articles published between January 1, 2014, and March 31, 2023, were searched. We included only randomized control trials of neoadjuvant treatments for clinical stage I-III TNBC that compared two or more regimens followed by curative intent breast surgery. The selected trials had data for odds ratio (OR) for pCR and hazard ratios (HRs) either for OS or for EFS or disease-free survival (DFS). We excluded trials including estrogen receptor positive, progesterone receptor-positive, or HER-2 positive diseases, and those without data enough to obtain ORs for pCR, HRs for OS, EFS, or DFS. Unpublished data as a full article was also excluded. If EFS could not be obtained from the articles, DFS was used in place of EFS. Two independent investigators (TY and TF) searched and extracted data. Any disagreement was resolved by discussion with the third author (ZZ). A linear regression model on a logarithmic scale weighted by the sample size of each trial was performed and the R2 was used to assess the trial-level association between OR for pCR and HRs for OS or EFS. Results: We identified eight trials with a total of 2,926 patients. Three of the eight trials used ICIs in the intervention arm. One trial did not provide OS data and was not included in the OS analysis. In four trials, EFS was not available and DFS was used for EFS analysis. The R2 was 0.191 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.165 to 0.218) for OS and 0.193 (95% CI, 0.167 to 0.219) for EFS. Conclusions: Similarly to the previous reports, our findings suggest that the surrogacy of the pCR rate for OS and EFS in recent neoadjuvant clinical trials for TNBC is weak. At this moment, there is no strong evidence to support using pCR as a surrogate for long-term survival outcomes in neoadjuvant clinical trials for TNBC. Citation Format: Toru Yoshino, Zao Zhang, Ryota Sato, Stanley Lipkowitz, Takeo Fujii. Revisiting the potential of pathological complete response as a surrogate for long-term survival outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer at the trial-level [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-03-07.

Abstract PO1-28-09: Rethinking the value of pathologic complete response rate for the survival outcomes of early triple-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Abstract Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has been more frequently used in breast cancer, but it’s controversial whether NACT or adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) is more effective in improving survival outcomes for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. Recent studies also proposed pathologic complete response (pCR) could not be a robust surrogate for survival outcomes in certain types of breast cancer. To address these questions, a general meta-analysis and a network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted to compare the survival outcomes of patients with pCR, non-pCR after NACT and ACT. The cut-off pCR rate was also declared to indicate when NACT produces equivalent survival outcomes to ACT (Registration: PROSPERO CRD42022336732). Methods: Databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of science and Cochrane library were searched up to June 2023 to investigate studies comparing NACT and ACT, as well as randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different regimens in NACT or ACT settings in early operable TNBC patients. Heterogeneity was assessed using χ² based Q-test and I², combined with hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) computed for overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS, or event-free survival). The NMA with a Bayesian framework was conducted using both random and fixed effect model. The Weighted Least Square method and the Least Absolutely Deviation method were used to determine the cut-off pCR rates of OS and DFS. Results: A total of 35 studies involving 21 RCTs and 34143 TNBC patients were included. The general meta-analysis comprised 14 cohort studies. Eight high-quality cohort studies with propensity score matching and 21 RCTs were included in NMA. The pooled pCR rate for NACT was 42.2% (95% CI 37.8%-46.8%). Overall, the NACT cohort showed significantly worse OS and DFS than ACT cohort (HR=1.67, 95% CI 1.22-2.31; HR=1.37, 95% CI 1.14-1.64). However, patients with pCR after NACT showed improved OS than ACT (HR=0.58, 95% CI 0.50-0.66), while the patients without pCR after NACT had pooper OS than ACT (HR=2.03, 95% CI 1.88-2.19). As for DFS, there was no statistically difference between pCR after NACT and ACT groups (HR=1.04, 95% CI 0.63-1.73), while patients without pCR after NACT had significantly worse DFS than ACT (HR=2.65, 95% CI 1.98-3.55). From the NMA, the OS and DFS were better when combining modern target therapy such as Bevacizumab, PARPi, and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor (Figure 1), but not achieving pCR completely negated the benefits of newer drugs. Adding adjuvant capecitabine to patients not achieving pCR seemed to favor the OS. It was predicted that when the pCR rates were 64.7% and 46.9% (Figure 2), respectively, the OS and DFS of patients treated with NACT would be the same as those of patients treated with ACT. Conclusions: Higher pCR rate after NACT was associated with improved OS compared with ACT in TNBC patients. However, failure to achieve pCR after NACT resulted in worse survival outcomes than ACT. NACT had similar survival outcomes with ACT only when the pCR rate was at least 46.9%. The development of effective NACT regimens is beneficial for breast cancer patients. Figure 1. Forest plot of the Hazard Ratio for OS and DFS in TNBC patients pCR: pathological complete response; Bev: Bevacizumab; Pt: platinum; NACT: neoadjuvant chemotherapy; ACT: adjuvant chemotherapy; vel: veliparib; PDi:PD1/PDL1 inhibitor; X: capecitabine Figure 2. The cut-off value of pCR when NACT and ACT have the same Hazard Ratio based on OS and DFS. pCR: pathological complete response; Bev: Bevacizumab; Pt: platinum; NACT: neoadjuvant chemotherapy; ACT: adjuvant chemotherapy Citation Format: Xiaoying Qiao, Shu Wang, Taobo Hu, Baosheng Liang. Rethinking the value of pathologic complete response rate for the survival outcomes of early triple-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-28-09.

Abstract PO5-03-05: Rethinking the value of pathologic complete response rate for the survival outcomes of early triple-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Abstract Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has been more frequently used in breast cancer, but it’s controversial whether NACT or adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) is more effective in improving survival outcomes for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. Recent studies also proposed pathologic complete response (pCR) could not be a robust surrogate for survival outcomes in certain types of breast cancer. To address these questions, a general meta-analysis and a network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted to compare the survival outcomes of patients with pCR, non-pCR after NACT and ACT. The cut-off pCR rate was also declared to indicate when NACT produces equivalent survival outcomes to ACT (Registration: PROSPERO CRD42022336732). Methods: Databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of science and Cochrane library were searched up to June 2023 to investigate studies comparing NACT and ACT, as well as randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different regimens in NACT or ACT settingsin early operable TNBC patients. Heterogeneity was assessed using χ² based Q-test and I², combined with hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) computed for overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS, or event-free survival). The NMA with a Bayesian framework was conducted using both random and fixed effect model. The Weighted Least Square method and the Least Absolutely Deviation method were used to determine the cut-off pCR rates of OS and DFS. Results: A total of 35 studies involving 21 RCTs and 34143 TNBC patients were included. The general meta-analysis comprised 14 cohort studies. Eight high-quality cohort studies with propensity score matching and 21 RCTs were included in NMA. The pooled pCR rate for NACT was 42.2% (95% CI 37.8%-46.8%). Overall, the NACT cohort showed significantly worse OS and DFS than ACT cohort (HR=1.67, 95% CI 1.22-2.31; HR=1.37, 95% CI 1.14-1.64). However, patients with pCR after NACT showed improved OS than ACT (HR=0.58, 95% CI 0.50-0.66), while the patients without pCR after NACT had pooper OS than ACT (HR=2.03, 95% CI 1.88-2.19). As for DFS, there was no statistically difference between pCR after NACT and ACT groups (HR=1.04, 95% CI 0.63-1.73), while patients without pCR after NACT had significantly worse DFS than ACT (HR=2.65, 95% CI 1.98-3.55). From the NMA, the OS and DFS were better when combining modern target therapy such as Bevacizumab, PARPi, and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor, but not achieving pCR completely negated the benefits of newer drugs. Adding adjuvant capecitabine to patients not achieving pCR seemed to favor the OS. It was predicted that when the pCR rates were 64.7% and 44.6%, respectively, the OS and DFS of patients treated with NACT would be the same as those of patients treated with ACT. Conclusions: Higher pCR rate after NACT was associated with improved OS compared with ACT in TNBC patients. However, failure to achieve pCR after NACT resulted in worse survival outcomes than ACT. NACT had similar survival outcomes with ACT only when the pCR rate was at least 44.6%. The development of effective NACT regimens is beneficial for breast cancer patients. Citation Format: Xiaoying Qiao, Taobo Hu, Baosheng Liang, Shu Wang. Rethinking the value of pathologic complete response rate for the survival outcomes of early triple-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-03-05.

Abstract PO3-05-09: The impact of body mass index on CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment survival outcomes in metastatic breast cancer

Abstract Introduction: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) are important in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Previous studies have shown that CDK4/6is affect metabolic processes and cell metabolism, including adipogenesis, lipid synthesis, and glucose regulation. Obesity has been associated with worse survival in breast cancer. We aimed to assess the effect of body mass index (BMI) on survival outcomes in patients treated with CDK4/6is for MBC. Methods: Patients diagnosed with metastatic HR+/HER2-negative BC and who were treated with palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib from 6/10/2015 to 12/28/2022 were selected from the Montefiore Health system database and followed until 3/24/2023. The patients were divided into three groups according to BMI level as follows; normal: 18.5-24.9 kg/m2, overweight: 25-29.9 kg/m2 and obese: ≥ 30 kg/m2. Patients were also stratified by BMI measured after 3 months of therapy. Characteristics of the patients and tumors in the subgroups were compared using chi-squared/Fisher’s exact test for categorical data and Kruskal-Wallis/Wilcox signed rank tests for continuous data. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analysis were used to compare overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Results: Among 221 patients, 66 were normal weight, 78 were overweight, and 77 were obese. There was no statistically significant difference in clinicopathological characteristics among the cohorts. Neither BMI measured at baseline nor after 3 months of therapy had any association with OS (P = 0.8 at baseline and P = 0.1 after 3 months) or PFS (P = 0.4 at baseline and P = 0.6 after 3 months). Multivariable analysis showed no statistically significant association between BMI and worse OS (HR: 1.1 for overweight, P = 0.7; and 0.96 for obese, P = 0.9) or worse PFS (HR: 0.9 for overweight, P = 0.8; and 0.76 for obese, P = 0.5). Multivariate analysis revealed a significant effect of obese BMI after 3 months of treatment on OS (HR: 0.48, P = 0.035) but not on PFS (HR: 0.88, P = 0.8). Overweight BMI after 3 months of treatment was not found to have a significant effect on OS (HR: 0.49, P = 0.063) or PFS (HR: 0.89, P = 0.9). Conclusion: The clinical effectiveness of CDK4/6is was not found to be influenced by BMI measured prior to therapy; however, there may be an association between improved OS and obese BMI after 3 months of treatment. Median OS and PFS in patients with MBC comparing different BMI groups (normal, overweight, and obese) at baseline prior to therapy and after 3 months of therapy. Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients with MBC comparing different BMI groups (normal, overweight, and obese) at baseline prior to therapy and after 3 months of therapy. Table 2 Table 3 Multivariable analysis of OS and PFS for patients with MBC comparing different BMI groups (normal, overweight, and obese) at baseline prior to therapy and after 3 months of therapy. Citation Format: Frank Zhang, Jesus Anampa Mesias. The impact of body mass index on CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment survival outcomes in metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-05-09.

Abstract PO1-09-11: Racial Differences in Pathologic Complete Response Rate and Overall Survival Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer

Abstract Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is increasingly used in the treatment of breast cancer and has been utilized in multiple clinical trials assessing the efficacy of novel therapies. Pathologic complete response (pCR) following NAC is associated with improved survival outcomes in breast cancer and pCR is a commonly used endpoint in clinical trials. Despite improvements in breast cancer survival using modern treatment regimens, Black women continue to experience worse survival outcomes as compared to White women. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between race and clinical outcomes, specifically pCR rate, recurrence free survival and overall survival, in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy at our institution. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who completed at least 75% of the recommended cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer between 2010 and 2016 and underwent surgery. Receptor subtypes were defined as HR+/HER2-negative, HER2+ or triple-negative. The association between race and pCR, defined as ypT0/ypTis ypN0, and survival endpoints of overall survival and recurrence free survival were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models. Results: A total of 532 women met the inclusion criteria, 323 (60.7%) were White, 188 (35.3%) were Black and 21 (3.9%) were other/unknown. Median follow-up was 65 months. The receptor subgroups consisted of 195 (36.7%) HR+/HER2-negative cancers, 193 (36.3%) HER2+ cancers and 144 (27.1%) triple-negative cancers. No significant association between race and receptor subtype (p=0.55) or pre-treatment clinical stage (p=0.96) was observed. The overall observed pCR rate was 19% for Black patients and 27% for White patients, demonstrating a significantly different pCR rate by race in multivariate analysis (odds ratio of pCR White vs Black of 1.75; p=0.02). The largest discrepancy in pCR rate between White and Black patients was within subjects with triple-negative disease (pCR rate 44% White patients vs 27% Black patients, p=0.03). There was no association between recurrence free survival and race in univariate analysis (p=0.15). A significant difference in overall survival by race was observed using multivariable Cox proportions hazard model (hazard ratio Black vs White 1.77; p=0.03). Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Black patients experienced a significantly lower pCR rate compared to White patients, with the biggest gap identified within triple-negative breast cancers. During the study period, Black patients also experienced a lower overall survival rate compared to White patients. Differences in the ability to achieve a pCR may be a contributing factor to the worse survival outcomes of Black patients. Citation Format: Chad Livasy, Erin Donahue, Brittany Neelands, Lejla Hadzikadic-Gusic, Terry Sarantou, Mckenzie Needham, Alicia Patrick, Arielle Heeke, Antoinette Tan, Richard White. Racial Differences in Pathologic Complete Response Rate and Overall Survival Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-09-11.

Abstract PO1-08-05: Using the CTS5 Score to Predict Late Recurrence in Male and Female Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Patients: a SEER database analysis of 65,729 cases

Abstract Purpose: The Clinical Treatment Score post-5 years (CTS5) score is a prognostic prediction tool to predict the risk of late distant recurrence in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. Here we aimed to evaluate the prediction role of CTS5 in male breast cancer patients using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Methods: ER+ early male and female breast cancer patients from the SEER database 2010-2013 were included. Clinicopathological features and the CTS5 score between the gender groups were compared using chi-square test. Overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier plots and compared between the groups with Log-rank test and multivariate cox proportional hazard regression models was used to determine the relationship between the CTS5 score and breast cancer survival outcomes in different gender cohorts. Results: A total of 65,729 ER+ breast cancer patients were included in the study and 611 were men. Male breast cancer was more likely to be diagnosed later in life (&amp;gt;50 years old, 87.1% vs 73.6%, p &amp;lt; 0.001), with more aggressive biological features (grade Ⅱ 51.6% vs 47.2%, p &amp;lt; 0.001; grade Ⅲ 37.8% vs 28.3%, p &amp;lt; 0.001) , and higher tumor burden (stage Ⅱ 45.8% vs 32.9%, p &amp;lt; 0.001, stage Ⅲ 17.5% vs 10.5%, p &amp;lt; 0.001) when compared to female counterparts. More male patients were CTS5 intermediate- or high-risk than female patients (high 7.9% vs 6.3%, intermediate 41.1% vs 24.6%, low 51.1% vs 69.1%, p &amp;lt; 0.001). Patients were divided into 0-5 year and &amp;gt;5 year cohorts based on whether they had a BCSS event within 5 years. In the &amp;gt;5 year cohort, patients with CTS5 high- or intermediate- risk had worse survival outcomes compared with low-risk cases in male and postmenopausal female patients but not in premenopausal female patients. In the 0-5 year cohort, the CTS5 score was not predictive for disease recurrence in male or postmenopausal patients. Conclusion: Male breast cancer patients were more likely to have aggressive tumors and worse survival outcomes. The CTS5 score could be applied to predict breast cancer-specific mortality risk beyond 5 years in male ER+ breast cancer patients. Citation Format: Fenhua Wang, Fang Ren, Jian Qian, Yunxia Xu, Jiayi Wu, Yu Zong, Xidong Gu. Using the CTS5 Score to Predict Late Recurrence in Male and Female Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Patients: a SEER database analysis of 65,729 cases [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-08-05.

Abstract PO4-17-11: Normalized Breast Cancer Survival Outcomes in U.S. Tumor Registries

Abstract Background The largest U.S. tumor registries, NCDB (National Cancer Database) and SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program), are vital sources of epidemiological data and are frequently utilized in research. Although the NCDB includes the majority of patients diagnosed with breast cancer, it is a hospital-based registry. In contrast, SEER is a population-based registry, but includes less than half of all breast cancer patients diagnosed each year. While the US Cancer Statistics Public Use Database (USCS) captures nearly all breast cancers, treatment and survival data are not included. As such, we sought to normalize the NCDB and SEER populations to mirror the USCS population and examine survival outcomes after normalization. Methods All patients diagnosed with stage I-IV breast cancer (2010-2018) were selected from the NCDB and SEER. Frequencies of patients by select characteristics were exported from the USCS. Rates from the USCS were then used to normalize the NCDB and SEER cohorts, using patient weighted frequencies for age, sex, race/ethnicity, tumor biomarkers [estrogen receptor (ER), HER2], and extent of disease (local, regional, distant; anatomic staging data not available in USCS). Of note, the USCS does not have individual patient-level data (only summary data for select variables), and thus, weighted frequencies were used for normalization. The weighted frequencies were calculated based on the total number of patients in the USCS database divided by the total number of patients in the NCDB or SEER separately for each variable (age, sex, race/ethnicity, etc). Weighted and unweighted data were summarized with N (%). Unweighted patient and disease characteristics (crude data) were compared using Chi-square tests. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method before and after normalization. Results The USCS cohort included 2,473,739 patients; the NCDB included 1,441,556 and SEER 504,938. The median followup was 54.9 months for NCDB and 57 months for SEER. There were minimal differences between the cohorts based on age (age &amp;lt; 50y: USCS 18.1%, NCDB 19.3%, SEER 18.9%) or sex (female: USCS 99.1%, NCDB 99.1%, SEER 99.3%). However, there were notable differences in the racial/ethnic composition; non-Hispanic White: USCS 75%, NCDB 78.2%, SEER 68.2%; non-Hispanic Black: USCS 11.4%, NCDB 11.4%, SEER 9.9%; Hispanic: USCS 8.3%, NCDB 5.9%, SEER 11.7%; p&amp;lt; 0.001 for USCS vs NCDB and USCS vs SEER). There were minimal differences in tumor biomarkers (ER+: USCS 82.9%, NCDB 83%, SEER 84.9%; HER2+: USCS 14.5%, NCDB 14.1%, SEER 13.8%), but significant differences in extent of disease (local: USCS 66.1%, NCDB 80.2%, SEER 68.4%; distant: USCS 6%, NCDB 3.9%, SEER 3.9%; p&amp;lt; 0.001 for USCS vs NCDB and USCS vs SEER). For the variables that were similar without weighting (age, sex, tumor biomarkers), OS was also similar after weighting (Table). After normalizing the NCDB based on race, 8-year OS remained comparable (crude 77.2% vs weighted 77.3%); similar findings were noted after normalizing SEER (crude 75.8% vs weighted 75.3%). After normalizing the NCDB based on extent of disease, 8-year OS was notably worse (crude 77.2% vs weighted 74.2%); similar findings were noted for SEER (crude 75.8% vs weighted 74.4%). Conclusions While national tumor registries afford researchers the opportunity to study large breast cancer cohorts, they do not always fully represent the entire breast cancer population. This limitation should be considered when working with these data sets. Table. Citation Format: Tori Chanenchuk, Kerri-Anne Crowell, Samantha Thomas, Rachel Greenup, Jennifer Plichta. Normalized Breast Cancer Survival Outcomes in U.S. Tumor Registries [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-17-11.

YTHDF2 favors protumoral macrophage polarization and implies poor survival outcomes in triple negative breast cancer

YTHDF2 favors protumoral macrophage polarization and implies poor survival outcomes in triple negative breast cancer

Systematic Review of Survival Outcomes of Pregnancy-Associated Breast Cancer in Asian Countries.

Pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) is a rare type of gestational cancer. It poses a significant challenge in diagnosis and management, especially in Asian countries with limited resources. We carried out a systematic literature review and narrative synthesis to identify survival outcomes for women with PABC in Asia. We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library and the reference lists of the included English language articles for those conducted between January 2010 and August 2022. The search terms were pregnancy-associated breast cancer, breast cancer AND pregnancy, survival of PABC and prognosis of PABC patients. PABC is defined as breast cancer diagnosed either during pregnancy or 1 year-5 years postpartum. This review included observational studies conducted in Asian countries. The final 11 articles met the selection criteria and were analysed. Five of the studies had high quality methods as assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist. We reported study design, year of diagnosis, country, definition of PABC, control group, age of participants, median follow-up time, survival outcomes and pregnancy as prognostic factors. Only five studies reported that PABC patients had a poor overall or disease-free survival rate compared to the control. Pregnancy was a significant independent prognostic factor of breast cancer in only two studies. This review highlights that pregnancy has an unconfirmed association with breast cancer survival in Asia. Most studies that found a non-significant association had small samples, thus there is a need for large-scale multinational epidemiological studies in Asia to establish the survival outcomes in PABC patients.

Racial disparities in outcomes of patients with stage I-III triple-negative breast cancer after adjuvant chemotherapy: a post-hoc analysis of the E5103 randomized trial.

Breast cancer mortality is higher in Black women than other racial groups. This difference has been partially attributed to a higher proportion of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, it is uncertain if survival disparities exist in racially diverse TNBC patients receiving similar treatments. Here, we examine racial differences in disease-related outcomes in TNBC patients treated on the E5103 clinical trial. From 2007 to 2011, 4,994 patients with stage I-III HER2-negative breast cancer were randomized to adjuvant chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab. This analysis was limited to the subset of 1,742 TNBC patients with known self-reported race. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier curves and adjusted Cox-Proportional Hazards models were used to determine breast cancer events and survival outcomes. Of the analysis population, 51 (2.9%) were Asian, 269 (15.4%) Black, and 1422 (81.6%) White. Median age was 51 years. Patient characteristics, treatment arm, and local therapies were similar across racial groups. White women were more commonly node-negative (56% vs. 49% and 44% in Asian and Black women, respectively; p < 0.01). At a median follow-up of 46 months, unadjusted Kaplan-Meier locoregional and distant recurrence, and disease-free and overall survival, did not differ significantly by race. In Cox models adjusted for patient and tumor characteristics and treatment arm, race was not associated with any disease event. Larger tumor size and nodal involvement were consistently associated with breast cancer events. This clinical trial population of similarly treated TNBC patients showed no racial differences in breast cancer outcomes. Disease extent, rather than race, was associated with disease events.

Survival outcomes in HER2-low versus HER2-zero breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis

BackgroundThe survival outcomes in HER2-low versus HER2-zero breast cancer (BC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) remain unclear. The meta-analysis was conducted to summarize current evidence about the survival outcomes in HER2-low versus HER2-zero BC.MethodsWe conducted a systematic search in PubMed and EMBASE databases to identify relevant studies.ResultsA total of 14 studies with 53,714 patients were included. Overall, 34,037 patients (63.37%) were HER2-low, and 19,677 patients (36.63%) were HER2-zero. Patients with HER2-low tumors had a significantly lower pathological complete response (pCR) rate than patients with HER2-zero tumors, regardless of the hormone receptor status. Compared with HER2-zero breast cancer, the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of HER2-low BC were longer in the overall cohort (HR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.61–0.85; P < 0.0001; HR = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.75–0.92; P = 0.0002); however, no differences were observed in terms of OS and DFS between HER2-low and HER2-zero BC in the HR-negative group. In the HR-positive group, HER2-low status had no significant impact on OS, while significantly associated with increased DFS (HR = 0.85; 95% CI = 0.76–0.96; P = 0.007).ConclusionThese results suggest that although HER2-low BC has a poor response to NACT, it is correlated with favorable OS and DFS after NACT in the overall cohort as well as longer DFS in the HR-positive group.

Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in women with previous breast cancer: a nationwide study of singleton births 1973-2017.

What are the obstetric and perinatal outcomes in births to breast cancer survivors compared to women without previous breast cancer? Women who conceived during the first 2 years following a breast cancer diagnosis had a higher risk for preterm birth, induced delivery, and cesarean section, while no increased risks were observed in births conceived later than 2 years after a breast cancer diagnosis. A recent meta-analysis found higher risks of cesarean section, preterm birth, low birthweight, and small for gestational age in pregnancies among breast cancer survivors. Less is known about rarer outcomes such as pre-eclampsia or congenital malformations. We conducted a population-based matched cohort study including all breast cancer survivors who gave birth to singletons 1973-2017 in Sweden, identified through linkage between the Swedish Cancer Register, the Medical Birth Register, and the National Quality Register for Breast Cancer. Each birth following breast cancer (n = 926) was matched by maternal age at delivery, parity, and calendar year at delivery to 100 births in a comparator cohort of women (n = 92 490). Conditional logistic and multinomial regression models estimated relative risks (RR) with 95% CI. Subgroup analyses by time since diagnosis and type of treatment were performed. Previous breast cancer was associated with higher risks of induced delivery (RR; 1.3, 1.0-1.6), very preterm birth (RR; 1.8, 1.1-3.0), and planned preterm birth (RR; 1.6, 1.0-2.4). Women who conceived within 1 year after breast cancer diagnosis had higher risks of cesarean section (RR; 1.7, 1.0-2.7), very preterm birth (RR; 5.3, 1.9-14.8), and low birthweight (RR; 2.7, 1.4-5.2), while the risks of induced delivery (RR; 1.8, 1.1-2.9), moderately preterm birth (RR; 2.1, 1.2-3.7), and planned preterm birth (RR; 2.5, 1.1-5.7) were higher in women who conceived during the second year after diagnosis. Women who conceived later than 2 years after breast cancer diagnosis had similar obstetric risks to their comparators. As information on the end date of treatment was unavailable, the time between the date of diagnosis and conception was used as a proxy, which does not fully capture the effect of time since end of treatment. In addition, treatments and clinical recommendations have changed over the long study period, which may impact childbearing patterns in breast cancer survivors. Risks of adverse obstetric outcomes in breast cancer survivors were confined to births conceived within 2 years of diagnosis. As family building holds significance for numerous young breast cancer patients, these findings are particularly important to inform both breast cancer survivors and clinicians about future reproductive outcomes. This work was supported by the Swedish Cancer Society (grant number 22-2044 Pj A.L.V.J.), Karolinska Institutet Foundations (grant number: 2022-01696 F.E.L., 2022-01559 A.L.V.J.), and the Swedish Research Council (grant number: 2021-01657 A.L.V.J.). K.A.R.-W. is supported by grants from the Swedish Cancer Society (20 0170 F) and the Radiumhemmets Research Foundations for clinical researchers 2020-2026. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. N/A.

248 (PB-064) Poster - CAIX and related genes predict poor survival outcomes in hormonal receptor-negative breast cancer

248 (PB-064) Poster - CAIX and related genes predict poor survival outcomes in hormonal receptor-negative breast cancer

Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of TLR4 expression in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

The prognostic value of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) in breast cancer remains to be determined. Therefore, this paper aims to conduct a meta-analysis to assess the correlation between TLR4 and clinicopathological indicators as well as survival outcomes in breast cancer. Related literature retrieved from Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and China Wanfang. The search deadline is April 12, 2023. The outcome measures employed in the study comprised hazard ratio (HR), odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) as effective indices. The data analysis was conducted using Stata 17.0 software. High TLR4 expression was associated with lymph node metastasis (OR=2.077, 95%CI=1.160-3.717, P= 0.014), tumor size (≥2 cm) (OR=2.194, 95%CI= 1.398-3.445, P= 0.001), PR expression (OR = 0.700, 95% CI = 0.505-0.971, P= 0.033), and clinical stage (OR = 3.578, 95%CI= 3.578-5.817, P<0.05), but not with histological grade (95%CI= 0.976-1.735, P= 0.072), ER expression (OR = 1.125, 95% CI = 0.492-2.571,P= 0.781), and HER-2 status (OR = 1.241, 95% CI = 0.733-2.101, P = 0.422). In addition, TLR4 overexpression was an independent prognostic indicator of DFS (HR= 1.480, 95%CI= 1.028- 2.130, p= 0.035) in breast cancer patients, but not related to OS(HR=1.730, 95%CI= 0.979-3.057, P= 0.059). From our main analysis results, high TLR4 expression is associated with lymph node metastasis, larger tumor size (≥2 cm), later clinical stage, negative PR expression and shorter DFS, suggesting poor prognosis in breast cancer patients.

NDRG1 is a prognostic biomarker in breast cancer and breast cancer brain metastasis

AbstractBrain metastases are secondary brain tumours characterised by their aggressive nature and poor prognosis. Breast cancer is one of the most common primary tumours in women to spread to the brain. A lack of biomarkers predicting likely spread to the brain and limited therapeutic interventions represents major areas of clinical unmet need. We investigated N‐myc downregulated gene‐1 (NDRG1) as a clinically relevant biomarker in breast cancer brain metastasis patients. NDRG1 expression was investigated using immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays of two clinical cohorts: (i) brain metastatic breast cancers (n = 48) and brain metastases (n = 64; including a subset of 39 patient‐matched breast and brain metastasis cases) and (ii) unselected primary breast cancers (n = 336). NDRG1 was highly expressed in breast‐to‐brain metastases, as well as in high‐grade primary breast cancers. High NDRG1 expression and also an absence of expression were associated with worse survival outcomes in both breast cancer and breast cancer brain metastasis patients. This establishes NDRG1 as a ‘Goldilocks’ protein, where too much or too little has a negative effect on survival. We pose that this accounts for its previous categorisation as both tumour suppressor and oncoprotein. Additionally, a shift in NDRG1 localisation with a gain of nuclear expression was seen at the brain metastasis stage. Significant survival benefit in cases expressing cytoplasmic NDRG1 was observed, whereas NDRG1 localisation in the nucleus showed a clear association with poorer survival. In vitro analyses revealed that hypoxic stress significantly elevated NDRG1 expression and resulted in its nuclear localisation. Our findings suggest NDRG1 expression and subcellular localisation are clinically relevant biomarkers for poor prognosis in breast cancer and breast cancer brain metastasis.

HER2 amplification level by in situ hybridization predicts survival outcome in advanced HER2-positive breast cancer treated with pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel regardless of HER2 IHC results

BackgroundThe role of HER2 amplification level in predicting the effectiveness of HER2-directed therapies has been established. However, its association with survival outcomes in advanced HER2-positive breast cancer treated with dual HER2-blockade remains unexplored.MethodsThis is a single-center retrospective study of patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer treated with first-line pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel. The primary objective was to ascertain the relationship between treatment outcomes and the level of HER2 amplification by in situ hybridization (ISH).ResultsA total of 152 patients were included with a median follow-up duration of 50.0 months. Among the 78 patients who received ISH, a higher HER2/CEP17 ratio correlated significantly with longer PFS (HR 0.50, p = 0.022) and OS (HR 0.28, p = 0.014) when dichotomized by the median. A higher HER2 copy number also correlated significantly with better PFS (HR 0.35, p < 0.001) and OS (HR 0.27, p = 0.009). In multivariate analysis, the HER2/CEP17 ratio was an independent predictive factor for PFS (HR 0.66, p = 0.004) and potentially for OS (HR 0.64, p = 0.054), along with HER2 copy number (PFS HR 0.85, p = 0.004; OS HR 0.84, p = 0.049). Furthermore, the correlation between HER2 amplification level by ISH with PFS and OS was consistent across the HER2 IHC 1+/2+ and 3+ categories.ConclusionsThis is the first study to report that a higher level of HER2 amplification by ISH is associated with improved PFS and OS in advanced HER2-positive breast cancer treated with dual HER2-blockade. Notably, HER2 amplification level had a predictive role regardless of IHC results. Even in patients with HER2 protein expression of 3+, treatment outcome to HER2-directed therapy was dependent on the level of HER2 gene amplification.

Genetic Ancestry-specific Molecular and Survival Differences in Admixed Patients With Breast Cancer.

We aim to determine whether incremental changes in genetic ancestry percentages influence molecular and clinical outcome characteristics of breast cancer in an admixed population. Patients with breast cancer are predominantly characterized as "Black" or "White" based on self-identified race/ethnicity or arbitrary genetic ancestry cutoffs. This limits scientific discovery in populations that are admixed or of mixed race/ethnicity as they cannot be classified based on historical race/ethnicity boxes or genetic ancestry cutoffs. We used The Cancer Genome Atlas cohort and focused on genetically admixed patients that had less than 90% European, African, Asian, or Native American ancestry. Genetically admixed patients with breast cancer exhibited improved 10-year overall survival relative to those with >90% European ancestry. Within the luminal A subtype, patients with lower African ancestry had longer 10-year overall survival compared to those with higher African ancestry. The correlation of genetic ancestry with gene expression and DNA methylation in the admixed cohort revealed novel ancestry-specific intrinsic PAM50 subtype patterns. In luminal A tumors, genetic ancestry was correlated with both the expression and methylation of signaling genes, while in basal-like tumors, genetic ancestry was correlated with stemness genes. In addition, we took a machine-learning approach to estimate genetic ancestry from gene expression or DNA methylation and were able to accurately calculate ancestry values from a reduced set of 10 genes or 50 methylation sites that were specific for each molecular subtype. Our results suggest that incremental changes in genetic ancestry percentages result in ancestry-specific molecular differences even between well-established PAM50 subtypes which may influence disparities in breast cancer survival outcomes. Accounting for incremental changes in ancestry will be important in future research, prognostication, and risk stratification, particularly in ancestrally diverse populations.