Breast Cancer-specific Survival Rates Research Articles

Prognostic nomograms for young breast cancer: A retrospective study based on the SEER and METABRIC databases.

Young breast cancer (YBC) is a subset of breast cancer that is often more aggressive, but less is known about its prognosis. In this study, we aimed to generate nomograms to predict the overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) of YBC patients. Data of women diagnosed with YBC between 2010 and 2020 were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The patients were randomly allocated into a training cohort (n = 15,227) and internal validation cohort (n = 6,526) at a 7:3 ratio. With the Cox regression models, significant prognostic factors were identified and used to construct 3-, 5-, and 10-year nomograms of OS and BCSS. Data from the Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) database were used as an external validation cohort (n = 90). We constructed nomograms incorporating 10 prognostic factors for OS and BCSS. These nomograms demonstrated strong predictive accuracy for OS and BCSS in the training cohort, with C-indexes of 0.806 and 0.813, respectively. The calibration curves verified that the nomograms have good prediction accuracy. Decision curve analysis demonstrated their practical clinical value for predicting YBC patient survival rates. Additionally, we provided dynamic nomograms to improve the operability of the results. The risk stratification ability assessment also showed that the OS and BCSS rates of the low-risk group were significantly better than those of the high-risk group. Here, we generated and validated more comprehensive and accurate OS and BCSS nomograms than models previously developed for YBC. These nomograms can help clinicians evaluate patient prognosis and make clinical decisions.

Assessment of Treatment Sequence in Patients With Stage III Breast Cancer

IntroductionStage III breast cancer is defined as locally advanced breast cancer and is treated with curative intent. Historically, overall survival (OS) did not differ based on treatment sequence (neoadjuvant chemotherapy [NAC] followed by surgery versus surgery followed by chemotherapy). Given recent advancements, we examined if treatment sequence may be associated with improved OS in a contemporary cohort of patients with stage III breast cancer. MethodsPatients aged 18-80 years with prognostic stage III breast cancer who received chemotherapy and surgery were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Patients were stratified by treatment sequence (NAC versus surgery first). Unadjusted OS and breast cancer–specific survival (BCSS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the association of treatment sequence with OS and BCSS after adjustment for selected covariates. ResultsThe study included 26,573 patients; median follow-up was 62.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 61.0-63.0). Patients receiving NAC had a worse OS and BCSS compared to those who underwent surgery first (5-year OS rates 0.66 versus 0.73; 5-year BCSS rates 0.70 versus 0.77; both log-rank P < 0.001). After adjustment for tumor subtype, receipt of NAC (versus surgery first) remained associated with a worse OS (hazard ratio 1.27, 95% CI 1.2-1.34, P < 0.001) and BCSS (hazard ratio 1.35, 95% CI 1.27-1.43, P < 0.001). ConclusionsBased on data from patients treated largely before 2020, undergoing surgery first may be associated with improved survival, even after adjustment for known covariates including tumor subtype. These findings may inform treatment when caring for patients with operable, locally advanced breast cancer.

Is Oncoplastic Surgery Safe in High-Risk Breast Cancer Phenotypes?

Oncoplastic surgery (OPS) has increased in popularity over the recent years. It is a form of breast conservation surgery allowing for larger partial mastectomy (PM) resections followed by either volume displacement or volume replacement reconstruction techniques. However, there is a lack of evidence on the effectiveness and safety of OPS with radiotherapy (OPS + RT) in high-risk breast cancer phenotypes, such as triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and HER2 positive (HER2+) patients. Our aim was to compare the breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and postoperative surgical complications in OPS + RT compared to PM alone with radiation (PM + RT) and total mastectomy (MTX) without radiotherapy (MTX-RT). Patient data were analyzed from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registries from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2020. Patients were stratified according to the type of surgery. Cox regression analysis was performed to assess prognostic factors of BCSS. A total of 24 621 patients with high-risk breast cancer phenotypes were identified, 180 underwent OPS + RT; 13 402, PM + RT; and 11 039 MTX-RT. OPS + RT was more frequently performed in younger (mean age of 65.53 years, SD: 9.29, p < 0.001), non-Hispanic White (90.5% vs. 77.7% vs. 76.3%) and single women (17.9% vs. 12.1% vs. 13.3%). MTX-RT was usually performed in patients with high histological grade, TNBC, and higher stages. Overall complication rates were higher in the MTX-RT, compared to OPS + RT and PM + RT, 2%, 1.1%, and 0.7%, respectively, p < 0.001. Rates of hematoma and surgical site infections were higher in the MTX-RT group. With a median follow-up of 46 months, OPS + RT had better BCSS rates at 5 years compared to PM + RT and MTX-RT (97.1% vs. 94.7% vs. 89.8%, p < 0.001). MTX-RT was found to be an independent prognostic factor of worse BCSS compared to OPS + RT (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.584; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.005-7.171), while PM + RT had no difference compared to OPS + RT (HR = 1.670, 95% CI: 0.624-4.469). OPS is a safe breast surgical option in patients with HER2+ and TNBC. Patients with high-risk phenotypes who underwent OPS + RT and have similar BCSS and complication rates compared to standard breast surgical options. As such, OPS should be considered as an option whenever breast conservation surgery is being discussed.

Update on the management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: current approach and future perspectives.

The standard treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ became well established through the results of several valuable clinical trials, and its therapeutic benefits have now come to be taken for granted. Ductal carcinoma in situ has an extremely good prognosis with the current treatment approach, with a 10-year breast cancer-specific survival rate of 97-98%. According to one retrospective cohort study, the breast cancer-specific survival rate of patients with low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ does not differ significantly between patients undergoing and not undergoing surgery. Some patients with ductal carcinoma in situ are not at a risk of progression to invasive cancer, but the predictors of such progression have not yet been clearly identified. Therefore, the same therapeutic strategies have been used to treat ductal carcinoma in situ and under the assumption that they have risks of invasive breast cancer, and a well-balanced risk/benefit ratio in respect of treatment has not yet been achieved. Based on the results of several recent clinical trials aimed at ensuring provision of a well-balanced treatment for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ which carries a good prognosis, de-escalation of postoperative adjuvant therapy has now begun. Currently, not only is the optimization of postoperative adjuvant therapy accelerating, but also clinical trials to de-escalate basic surgical treatments are under way. There is a possibility of achieving individualized treatment for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast with reduced treatment intervention. In this review, we present an overview of the current treatment approaches and potential future management strategies for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Surveillance for Distant Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients Who Underwent Contemporary Management: A Report from the Korean Breast Cancer Society Survivor Research Group

BackgroundCurrent guidelines recommend against the use of routine imaging tests to detect distant metastasis in asymptomatic breast cancer patients. However, recent advancements in effective therapeutics and diagnostic accuracy have raised the need to reassess the clinical efficacy of intensive metastasis surveillance. We report the results of a multicenter retrospective study to investigate the association between intensive imaging studies and survival outcomes.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the data of 4130 patients who underwent surgery from 11 hospitals in Korea between January 2010 and December 2011. Patients were divided into two groups on the basis of the intensity of metastasis imaging studies during their disease-free period. The types and intervals of the imaging studies were based on each physician’s decisions.ResultsHigh-intensive screening showed a shorter distant metastasis-free survival [p < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR) 1.62; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29–2.04], especially for patients in whom bone or lung was the first site of metastasis. With a median follow-up period of 110.0 months, the 5-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) rate was 96.5%. The high-intensity screening group showed significantly poorer BCSS compared with the low-intensity screening group (p < 0.001, HR 3.13; 95% CI 2.32–4.21). However, both multivariable analysis and propensity score matching analysis showed no significant association between the screening intensity and BCSS.ConclusionsFrequent imaging studies to detect distant metastasis were associated with earlier detection of distant metastasis, especially for lung and bone metastasis. However, intensive surveillance showed no apparent association with BCSS despite the use of currently available treatments.

Prognostic value of lymphocytes in patients with breast cancer receiving radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery: A post hoc analysis of a phase III randomized trial

PurposeTo evaluate the prognostic value of peripheral lymphocyte count (PLC) in the breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with radiotherapy (RT). Methods and MaterialsThis post hoc analysis was performed using data of 628 patients from a phase III, randomized controlled trial comparing hypofractionated RT (HFRT) with conventional fractionated RT (CFRT) after BCS. PLCs were obtained before, during, and after RT until the 1-year follow-up. The optimal cut-off PLCs were determined using the maxstat package in R. Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. ResultsA total of 275 (46.1 %) patients developed lymphopenia during RT, among them, 17 (2.8 %) had grade 3 lymphopenia and no one developed grade 4 lymphopenia. With a median follow-up of 110.8 months, patients with pre-RT PLCs of < 1.77 × 109/L had a significantly lower 10-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) rate (P = 0.013) and overall survival (OS) rate (P = 0.026). Patients with a nadir PLC of < 1.35 × 109/L had a significantly poorer 10-year OS rate (P = 0.048). Multivariate analysis showed that a pre-RT PLC of < 1.77 × 109/L was an independent factor influencing BCSS and OS, while the effect of the nadir PLC did not remain significant. Neither PLC nor lymphopenia recovery at post-RT 1, 3, and 6 months and 1 year was associated with survival. ConclusionsRadiation-induced lymphopenia in patients with breast cancer after BCS tends to be mild. The lower pre-RT PLC predicted poorer survival.

Racial disparities in presentation and survival for lobular breast cancer.

1596 Background: We characterized differences in presentation and survival, and identified predictors of survival, among women of varying race with lobular breast cancer. We also assessed if these trends were unique to ILC by comparing with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and mixed invasive ductal-lobular carcinoma (IDLC). Methods: Using the SEER database, we performed a population-based retrospective cohort study of women diagnosed with ILC, IDC, and IDLC between 1998 and 2019. We collected race, age, marital status, and income. Clinical data included grade, size, laterality, clinical stage, receptor status, surgery type, chemotherapy, radiation, and breast-cancer-specific survival (BCSS). Differences between racial groups were assessed using Chi-square tests or one-way ANOVA. To identify predictors of survival, Cox-proportional hazard models were constructed. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS and P values &lt; 0.05 were considered significant. Results: 38,769 women with ILC were identified, including 32,857 White, 2398 Black, 2352 Asian, and 1162 women of other race. Black women presented with higher-grade, advanced clinical stage, ER+ disease, N2-3 stage, and lower rates of unilateral/bilateral mastectomy than White women. Black women were more likely to not undergo surgery (7.13%), compared with White (4.25%) and Asian (4.04%) women ( P = .0001). Asian women were younger, had more ER-/PR- ILC, and received more chemotherapy. The five-year BCSS rates in Black, White, Asian, and women of other race were 91.5%, 94.2%, 93.7%, and 95.7%, respectively ( P&lt; .0001). Predictors of worse survival include Black race (HR 1.32, P &lt; .0001), ER-/PR- (HR 2.18, P&lt; .0001), ER+/PR- (HR 1.52, P&lt; .0001), and no surgery (HR 4.19, P &lt; .0001). Radiotherapy was associated with improved survival (HR 0.82, P &lt; .0001), while chemotherapy did not affect survival (HR 1.1, P= 0.0504). In comparing across breast cancer subtypes, Black women similarly present with higher grade tumors, advanced clinical stage, ER+ disease, and had higher rates of surgery omission in IDC and IDLC. However, ER-/PR- subtype was notably higher in ILC among Asian women compared with IDC, whereas Black women have higher rates of ER+/PR+ and ER-/PR- ILC. Black women had the lowest five-year BCSS rates across all breast cancer subtypes. Predictors of worse survival in IDC and IDLC include Black race and negative hormone receptor status, while radiation therapy was associated with improved survival. Conclusions: There are differences in clinical presentation of invasive lobular breast cancer according to race.Black women had more advanced disease, while Asian women were younger. Across all subtypes, overall survival for Black women at 5 years was worse compared to other racial groups. Our data provides insight into the complex interactions of race, clinical characteristics, and survival outcomes in lobular breast cancer, with implications for screening considerations.

Abstract GS02-08: Five-year outcomes of the IDEA trial of endocrine therapy without radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for postmenopausal patients age 50-69 with genomically-selected favorable Stage I breast cancer

Abstract Background: Multiple studies have shown a low risk of ipsilateral breast events (IBE) or other recurrences for selected patients age 65-70 or older with Stage I breast cancers treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS) and endocrine therapy (ET) without adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). We designed a prospective single-arm trial, IDEA (Individualized Decisions for Endocrine therapy Alone), to see if younger postmenopausal patients could also be successfully treated without RT, adding a genomic assay to classic selection factors. Methods: Postmenopausal patients aged 50-69 with pT1N0 unifocal invasive breast cancer with margins 2 mm or wider after BCS whose tumors were ER+, PR+, and Her2- with Oncotype DX 21-gene recurrence score (RS) 18 or lower were eligible to avoid RT if they consented to take at least 5 years of ET and surveillance on study. The primary endpoint was the rate of breast cancer recurrence at 5 years of follow-up after BCS. A valid 5–year assessment was defined as a clinical assessment within 4 months prior to the 5-year anniversary or later. Follow-up time was calculated from the date of BCS until first recurrence [ipsilateral breast events (IBE) or regional or distant failures] or to last clinical follow-up. The time-to-event endpoint was calculated using the product-limit method of Kaplan and Meier measured from the date of BCS. Results: 200 eligible patients were enrolled from 13 US institutions between June 2015 and October 2018. Median age was 63 years (IQR 58-66); mean RS was 11.2 (SD 4.8). Tumors were grade 1 in 85 patients, grade 2 in 109, and grade 3 in 6. Mean tumor size was 10 mm (SD 4.6). Lymphovascular invasion was present in 16 tumors and an extensive intraductal component in 11. Median follow-up time was 5.21 years (IQR 5.01-5.97); 8 of 14 patients with less than 56 months of follow-up were lost to follow-up. Overall and breast cancer-specific survival rates at 5 years were both 100%; 2 deaths occurred later than 5 years. The 5-year freedom from recurrence was 99% (95% CI, 96%-100%). One of the two events occurring by 5 years was an isolated axillary recurrence at 21 months treated with axillary dissection and breast and regional nodal irradiation. The other was an IBE at 49 months, treated with repeat BCS. Both these patients had been compliant with ET. Six additional patients recurred later than 5 years after BCS (5 IBEs, 1 IBE plus regional recurrence). Crude rates of IBE for the entire follow-up period for patients aged 50-59 and 60-69 were 3.3% (2/60) and 3.6% (5/140), respectively; crude rates of overall relapse were 5.0% (3/60) and 3.6% (5/140). Conclusions: This multicenter trial of ET without RT following BCS achieved a very low risk of relapse for postmenopausal patients with Stage I cancers using a genomic assay in combination with classic clinical and biologic features for treatment selection, including for patients younger than age 60. IDEA demonstrates a 5-year probability of recurrence consistent with or lower than the 4% risk estimated a priori, and the patients accrued were younger when compared to prior prospective trials (e.g., PRIME II, minimum age 65; CALGB 9343, minimum age 70; LUMINA, median age 67). The results of ongoing NRG BR007 trial, which randomly allocates women meeting these eligibility criteria to receive RT or not, and similar randomized and single-arm studies will help determine whether the option of avoiding initial RT can be offered to a broader group of women than current guidelines recommend. Long-term follow-up beyond the 5-year required period of ET will be important to determine if the risk of recurrence increases, particularly after discontinuation of ET. Citation Format: Reshma Jagsi, Kent Griffith, Eleanor Harris, Jean Wright, Abram Recht, Alphonse Taghian, Lucille Lee, Meena Moran, William Small, Candice Johnstone, Asal Rahimi, Gary Freedman, Mahvish Muzaffar, Bruce Haffty, Kathleen Horst, Simon Powell, Jody Sharp, Michael Sabel, Anne Schott, Mahmoud El-Tamer. Five-year outcomes of the IDEA trial of endocrine therapy without radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for postmenopausal patients age 50-69 with genomically-selected favorable Stage I breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr GS02-08.

Abstract PO4-08-04: Comparison of Outcomes and Prognosis between BRCA Pathogenic Variant Carriers Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery versus Mastectomy for Breast Cancer

Abstract Introduction: While outcomes are similar following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy among patients with sporadic breast cancer, data are still controversial for germline BRCA pathogenic variant carriers. We previously compared outcome following BCS between BRCA pathogenic variant carriers and non-carriers, and reported higher ipsilateral breast recurrence and comparable prognosis in the carriers. The purpose of this current study was to compare outcomes among BRCA pathogenic variant carriers undergoing BCS versus mastectomy in long-term follow-up period. Methods: Women with a BRCA pathogenic variant and a stage 0-III breast cancer who underwent definitive surgery from 1987–2021 were retrospectively identified from institutional database. Factors including clinicopathologic information and treatment characteristics were identified. Subsequent local recurrence, regional recurrence, distant recurrence, contralateral breast cancer (CBC), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS) rates were compared between BCS and mastectomy using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. The chi-square test and t-test were used to compare patient characteristics between the two groups. Results: A total of 232 BRCA mutation carriers with 257 cancers including 25 patients with synchronous bilateral breast cancer were identified. Surgical treatment included BCS for 82 cancers and mastectomy for 175 cancers including nipple-sparing mastectomy for 51 cancers. Patient age at surgery and cancer stage did not statistically differ between BCS and mastectomy groups. Comparing to patients choosing mastectomy, patients who underwent BCS were less likely to be aware of their genetic status before surgery and were more likely to receive radiation therapy (p &amp;lt; 0.001). Contralateral risk reducing mastectomy was performed in 22.5% (18/80) in the BCS group and 48.7% (74/152) in the mastectomy group (p &amp;lt; 0.001) concurrently or at any time after the first definitive surgery. Risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy was performed in 40% (32/80) in the BCS group and 49% (75/152) in the mastectomy group (p = 0.17). At 7.5 years median follow-up, local recurrence rate was statistically higher in the BCS group than in the mastectomy group (20.0% in BSC vs. 4.6% in mastectomy, p = 0.043). In patients who underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy, 4.0% (2/51) had local subcutaneous recurrence and no nipple-areolar recurrence was observed. Median duration from the first definitive surgery to ipsilateral local recurrence was 10.0 years in the BCS group and 2.3 years in the mastectomy group. Regional lymph node recurrence (11.2% in BCS vs. 6.4% in mastectomy, p = 0.62), distant recurrence (13.7% vs. 9.2%, p = 0.84), CBC (15.0% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.70), BCSS (88.8% vs. 94.1%, p = 0.65) and OS (87.5% vs. 94.1%, p = 0.49) rates did not statistically differ between two groups. Conclusions: With 7.5 years median follow-up, higher local recurrence rate was observed in BCS than in mastectomy among BRCA pathogenic variant carriers. Our results found no statistical difference between BCS and mastectomy in regional recurrence, distant recurrence, CBC, and prognosis, indicating relatively higher risk in BCS. While BCS could be an option for BRCA pathogenic variant carriers willing to continue high-risk breast surveillance, shared decision making should be carefully performed based on the long-term local recurrence risk. Citation Format: Kumiko Kida, Junko Takei, Misato Suzuki, Megumi Okawa, Sakurako Kazama, Sakiko Kondo, Michiko Yamanaka, Atsushi Yoshida. Comparison of Outcomes and Prognosis between BRCA Pathogenic Variant Carriers Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery versus Mastectomy for Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-08-04.

Is postmastectomy radiotherapy necessary for breast cancer patients with clinically node-positive downstaging to ypN0 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy?

The significance of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in breast cancer patients who initially have clinically node-positive (cN +) status but achieve downstaging to ypN0 following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains uncertain. This study aims to assess the impact of PMRT in this patient subset. Patients were enrolled from West China Hospital, Sichuan University from 2008 to 2019. Overall survival (OS), Locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and assessed with the log-rank test. The impact of PMRT was further analyzed by the Cox proportional hazards model. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce the selection bias. Of the 333 eligible patients, 189 (56.8%) received PMRT, and 144 (43.2%) did not. At a median follow-up period of 71months, the five-year LRFS, DMFS, BCSS, and OS rates were 99.1%, 93.4%, 96.4%, and 94.3% for the entire cohort, respectively. Additionally, the 5-year LRFS, DMFS, BCSS, and OS rates were 98.9%, 93.8%, 96.7%, and 94.5% with PMRT and 99.2%, 91.3%, 94.9%, and 92.0% without PMRT, respectively (all p-values not statistically significant). After multivariate analysis, PMRT was not a significant risk factor for any of the endpoints. When further stratified by stage, PMRT did not show any survival benefit for patients with stage II-III diseases. In the context of comprehensive treatments, PMRT might be exempted in ypN0 breast cancer patients. Further large-scale, randomized controlled studies are required to investigate the significance of PMRT in this patient subset.

ER+/PR− phenotype exhibits more aggressive biological features and worse outcome compared with ER+/PR+ phenotype in HER2-negative inflammatory breast cancer

The loss of progesterone receptor (PR) often predicts worse biological behavior and prognosis in estrogen receptor-positive (ER +) breast cancer. However, the impact of PR status on inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) has not been studied. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to investigate the influence of PR on IBC. Patients with ER+ and HER2-negative IBC were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. Pearson’s χ2 test was used to compare the clinicopathological characteristics between patients with estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive (ER+/PR +) and patients with estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-negative (ER+/PR−). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the effects of PR status on the breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) in IBC. Overall, 1553 patients including 1157 (74.5%) patients with ER+/PR+ and 396 (25.5%) patients with ER+/PR− were analyzed in our study. The patients with ER+/PR− were more likely to be high histological grade (p < 0.001) and liver metastasis (p = 0.045) compared to patients with ER+/PR+. Despite higher chance of receiving chemotherapy (83.6% vs 77.3%, P = 0.008), patients with ER+/PR− showed worse BCSS (5-year BCSS rate, 34.3% vs 51.3%, P < 0.001) and OS (5-year OS rate, 31.3% vs 46.1%, P < 0.001) compared with ER+/PR+ phenotype. Multivariate survival analysis showed that patients with ER+/PR− still had worse BCSS (hazard ratios [HR]: 1.764, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.476–2.109, P < 0.001) and OS (HR: 1.675, 95% CI 1.411–1.975, P < 0.001) than ER+/PR+ phenotype. Furthermore, patients with ER+/PR− showed worse outcomes than ER+/PR+ phenotype in most subgroups, especially in patients with younger age (≤ 60 years), lower histological grade, lymph node involved and distant metastasis. Patients with ER+/PR− had more aggressive biological behaviors and worse outcomes than patients with ER+/PR+ in IBC. Stronger treatments maybe needed for IBC patients with ER+/PR−.

Omission of Radiotherapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery for Women With Breast Cancer With Low Clinical and Genomic Risk: 5-Year Outcomes of IDEA.

Multiple studies have shown a low risk of ipsilateral breast events (IBEs) or other recurrences for selected patients age 65-70 years or older with stage I breast cancers treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and endocrine therapy (ET) without adjuvant radiotherapy. We sought to evaluate whether younger postmenopausal patients could also be successfully treated without radiation therapy, adding a genomic assay to classic selection factors. Postmenopausal patients age 50-69 years with pT1N0 unifocal invasive breast cancer with margins ≥2 mm after BCS whose tumors were estrogen receptor-positive, progesterone receptor-positive, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative with Oncotype DX 21-gene recurrence score ≤18 were prospectively enrolled in a single-arm trial of radiotherapy omission if they consented to take at least 5 years of ET. The primary end point was the rate of locoregional recurrence 5 years after BCS. Between June 2015 and October 2018, 200 eligible patients were enrolled. Among the 186 patients with clinical follow-up of at least 56 months, overall and breast cancer-specific survival rates at 5 years were both 100%. The 5-year freedom from any recurrence was 99% (95% CI, 96 to 100). Crude rates of IBEs for the entire follow-up period for patients age 50-59 years and age 60-69 years were 3.3% (2/60) and 3.6% (5/140), respectively; crude rates of overall recurrence were 5.0% (3/60) and 3.6% (5/140), respectively. This trial achieved a very low risk of recurrence using a genomic assay in combination with classic clinical and biologic features for treatment selection, including postmenopausal patients younger than 60 years. Long-term follow-up of this trial and others will help determine whether the option of avoiding initial radiotherapy can be offered to a broader group of women than current guidelines recommend.

The Impact of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy on Female Patients With T3-4c Breast Cancer and 1-2 Positive Lymph Nodes: A Population-Based Cohort Study

PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients diagnosed with cT3-4c breast cancer with no more than 2 positive sentinel lymph nodes. MethodsUsing data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, this retrospective study identified patients diagnosed with T3-4c breast cancer between 2010 and 2015. These patients were then categorized into 2 groups: the SLNB group, which underwent examination of 1-5 regional lymph nodes and the axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) group, which underwent examination of ≥10 regional lymph nodes. Propensity score matching analysis was used to assess the efficacy of SLNB in cT3-4c patients. ResultsA total of 1139 patients were included in the analysis, with 423 and 716 patients in the SLNB and ALND groups, respectively. The 10-year overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) rates in the SLNB group were 66.1% and 76.3%, respectively, compared with 66.0% and 73.8%, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of OS (HR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.80-1.25, P = .997) and BCSS (HR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.83-1.41, P = .551). Even after 1:1 propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in OS (HR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.65-1.16, P = .341) and BCSS (HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.59-1.16, P = .266) between the 2 groups. ConclusionThis study demonstrates that SLNB does not adversely affect the survival of cT3-4c breast cancer patients with 1-2 sentinel lymph node metastases.

Is There a Survival Difference Between Male and Female Breast Cancer Subtypes According to the Prognostic Staging System? A Population-Based Cohort Study.

In retrospective studies investigating the difference in survival by gender, there are conflicting results. It was aimed to compare overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) in male and female breast cancer subtypes according to the prognostic staging system. Overall survival rates and BCSS rates of patients diagnosed with breast cancer between 2010 and 2019 compared by gender for all cohorts, stages, and molecular subtypes using the SEER Database. The stage has been rearranged according to the eighth edition of the AJCC. 364039 patients were included in the study. .7% (n = 2503) of all breast cancers were male breast cancer. Overall survival (male: 5-year OS 73.9%, female = 5-year OS 86%) and BCSS rates (male: 5-year BCSS 78.9%, female = 5-year BCSS 94.7%) were significantly higher in females than in males for all cohorts. OS (male: 5-year OS 66.2% vs female: 5-year OS 88.3%), and BCSS (male: 5-year BCSS 88.4% vs female: 5-year 93.6%) rates were higher in hormone receptor (HR)-positive/Her2-negative female patients. Overall survival rate is higher in females in stage I (male: 5-year OS 81.5%, female: 5-year OS 92.8%), and BCSS rate is higher in stage I (male: 5-year BCSS 94.8%, female: 5-year BCSS 97.5%). Males have 2 times (HR = 2.023) higher overall mortality risk than females, but the risk of dying from breast cancer is only 1.6 times (HR = 1.596) higher. Breast cancer-specific mortality is significantly higher in male breast cancers, especially in the early stage, and HR-positive subtype than females.

Breast-conserving surgery is an appropriate procedure for centrally located breast cancer: a population-based retrospective cohort study

BackgroundThe evidence of breast-conserving therapy (BCT) applied in centrally located breast cancer (CLBC) is absent. This study aims to investigate the long-term survival of breast-conserving therapy (BCT) in centrally located breast cancer (CLBC) compared with mastectomy in CLBC and BCT in non-CLBC.MethodsTwo hundred ten thousand four hundred nine women with unilateral T1-2 breast cancer undergoing BCT or mastectomy were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were assessed via log-rank test. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline features, and the multivariable Cox model was used to estimate the adjusted hazard ratio [HR] and its 95% confidence interval [CI] for breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS).ResultsWith a median follow-up of 91 months, the BCSS and OS rates in patients who received BCT were greater than those patients treated with mastectomy in the entire CLBC set. Multivariable Cox analyses showed that CLBC patients who received BCT had better BCSS (HR = 0.67, 95%CI: 0.55–0.80, p < 0.001) and OS (HR = 0.78, 95%CI: 0.68–0.90, p = 0.001) than patients who received a mastectomy, but there were no significant differences of BCSS (HR = 0.65, 95%CI: 0.47–0.90, p = 0.009) and OS (HR = 0.82, 95%CI: 0.65–1.04, p = 0.110) after PSM. In patients treated with BCT, CLBC patients had a similar BCSS (HR = 0.99, 95%CI: 0.87–1.12, p = 0.850) but a worse OS (HR = 1.09, 95%CI: 1.01–1.18, p = 0.040) compared to that of the non-CLBC patient, but there was no significant difference both BCSS (HR = 1.05, 95%CI: 0.88–1.24, p = 0.614) and OS (HR = 1.08, 95%CI: 0.97–1.20, p = 0.168) after PSM.ConclusionOur findings revealed that BCT should be an acceptable and preferable alternative to mastectomy for well-selected patients with CLBC.

Secretory Carcinoma of Breast: A Population-Based Study.

In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the characteristic features and survival of secretory carcinoma of the breast (SCB), which is one of the rare malignant tumors of the breast. Data of patients with histopathological diagnosis of SCB between 2010 and 2019 were extracted from the SEER database. These patients were evaluated in terms of age, race, molecular subtype, grade, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2 receptor, TNM stage, surgical status, chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatment. Overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) of the whole population and subgroups [in terms of surgery procedure (mastectomy/breast-conserving surgery), and hormone receptor status (positive/negative)] were analyzed. 70 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 57years (range 2-82). 32.9% of the patients were diagnosed under the age of 50. 97.1% of the patients were female; 2.9% were male. The vast majority of patients were white race (81.4%). Although the rates of localization were higher in the upper outer quadrant (31.4%), centrally located tumors (18.5%) were also quite common. The most frequently detected molecular subtype was hormone positive/HER2 negative. All patients were non-metastatic, 81.4% of patients did not have lymph node metastases, and most of the patients were stage IA. Median follow-up was 37months (range 0-118months). Considering all patients, OS was 76.3%, 5-year OS was 91.8%, and BCSS was 88%, 5-year BCSS was 97.8%. There was no statistically significant difference in OS and BCSS according to subgroups (P > .01). SCB, a rare histopathologic type, has high OS and BCSS rates.

Prognosis of post-neoadjuvant therapy patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction: a SEER-based, propensity-matched study

ObjectiveThe application of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) for post-neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) patients was controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term survival outcomes of IBR for these patients.MethodsData between January 2010 and November 2017 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce the influence of confounding factors between the mastectomy alone group (MA) and the mastectomy with IBR group (IBR). The rates of 5 year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were compared by Kaplan–Meier curves with log-rank test.ResultsThe IBR was associated with improved 5-year BCSS in the IBR group before PSM (88.5 vs. 79.1%, P < 0.001). The proportion of IBR increased from 21.5% in 2010 to 28.2% in 2017. After PSM, a total of 9,610 patients were enrolled for survival analysis (4,805 in each group). In the complete response (CR) group, the 5-year BCSS rates did not differ (93.4 vs. 95.6%, P = 0.16). In the non-CR group, the 5-year BCSS rate was higher in patients who received IBR (82.5% 79.4%, P = 0.034).ConclusionIn general, the application of IBR among post-NAT patients has steadily increased from 2010 to 2017. In the CR group, survival outcomes of post-NAT patients who received IBR were similar to those who received mastectomy alone. In the non-CR group, IBR was associated with potential survival benefits. More studies are expected to validate our findings.

Breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy for treatment of breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

To compare recurrence and survival outcomes between breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). The data of 730 patients who underwent NACT between 2000 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 104 (14.2%) patients received BCS and 626 (85.8%) received mastectomy. Locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant metastases (DM), disease-free survival (DFS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The impact of BCS versus mastectomy on outcomes was assessed by multivariate Cox models. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance covariates between the two groups. The median follow-up of BCS and mastectomy groups were 86.5 and 87.4 months, respectively. There were significant differences in distribution of most baseline characteristics between two groups. Compared with those who underwent mastectomy, the patients with BCS had similar 5-year LRR, DM, and DFS rates, but had significantly higher 5-year BCSS (98.9% vs. 90.4%, P = 0.005) and OS (98.9% vs. 90.1%, P = 0.003) rates. Multivariate analysis also showed that BCS significantly improved BCSS (HR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.08-0.85, P = 0.025) and OS (HR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.08-0.79, P = 0.018). After IPTW adjustment, the LRR, DM, DFS, BCSS and OS between two groups had no significant differences. The recurrence and survival outcomes are comparable with BCS and mastectomy. Thus, BCS is a safe treatment option for selected breast cancer patients after NACT.

The disparities in prognostic prediction and annualized hazard function in different molecular subtypes between young Chinese and White American women with breast cancer.

The prognostic disparities in different molecular subtypes between young Chinese and White American breast cancer patients remain unclear. The goal of this study was to explore the prognostic differences in different molecular subtypes between Chinese and White American patients aged ≤ 40 years. We included Chinese and White female breast cancer patients at or under the age of 40 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER) and the West China Hospital of Sichuan University. The chi-square test, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards model were employed to evaluate the distribution and survival disparities in the two racial/ethnic cohorts and different molecular subtypes. An annualized hazard function was used to calculate the annual failure rate among different molecular subtypes. This study included 20,859 female breast cancer patients at or under the age of 40, of whom 18,400 were White women and 2,459 were Chinese women. With a median follow-up time of 47 months, the 5-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) rates for young Chinese and White women were 93.9% and 90.0%, respectively (P< 0.001). Molecular subtype was found to be a significant predictor in both young Chinese and White patients (P< 0.001), but different trends were observed in the two racial/ethnic cohorts when exploring the association between BCSS and molecular subtypes. Among young White patients, the hormone receptor (HoR) (+)/epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) (+) subtype had the best 5-year BCSS rate, while in young Chinese patients, the HoR (+)/HER2 (+) and HoR (+)/HER2 (-) showed comparable survival curves and both showed superior 5-year BCSS than other subtypes. Stratification by molecular subtypes, young Chinese patients demonstrated a superior 5-year BCSS in HoR (+)/HER2 (-) (96.3% vs 92.9%, P< 0.001) and triple-negative subtypes (88% vs 81.7%, P= 0.006) compared to young White American patients, while no significant differences were found in HoR (+)/HER2 (+) and HER2 enriched tumors. The annual hazard function for BCSS showed that there were significantly different trends in the HoR (+)/HER2 (-) and HoR (+)/HER2 (+) subtypes between young Chinese and White patients. There are disparities in prognosis and annualized hazard function between young Chinese and White females with breast cancer in different molecular subtypes.

Association between marital status and all-cause mortality of patients with metastatic breast cancer: a population-based study

This study aimed to investigate the association between marital status and the prognosis of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Data of patients with MBC were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients were classified into married and unmarried groups. Kaplan–Meier analysis with the log-rank test was conducted to compare breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) between the groups. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional models were used to determine whether marital status was independently associated with OS, and the Fine–Gray subdistribution hazard method was performed to determine whether marital status was independently associated with BCSS. In total, 16,513 patients with MBC were identified, including 8949 married (54.19%) and 7564 unmarried (45.81%) patients. The married patients were significantly younger [median age (interquartile range), 59.0 (50.0–68.0) vs. 63.0 (53.0–75.0); p < 0.001] and received more aggressive treatments, such as chemotherapy (p < 0.001) and surgery (p < 0.001), than the unmarried patients. Moreover, married patients had higher 5-year BCSS (42.64% vs. 33.17%, p < 0.0001) and OS (32.22% vs. 21.44%, p < 0.0001) rates. Multivariable analysis revealed that marital status was an independent prognostic factor, and married status was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of breast cancer-specific (sub-hazard ratio, 0.845; 95% confidence interval, 0.804–0.888; p < 0.001) and all-cause (hazard ratio, 0.810; 95% confidence interval, 0.777–0.844; p < 0.001) mortality. Unmarried patients had a 15.5% increased risk of breast cancer-specific mortality and a 19.0% increased risk of overall mortality compared with married patients with MBC. BCSS and OS were superior in married populations compared with unmarried populations in most subgroups. Marital status was an independent prognostic indicator for survival in patients with MBC and was associated with significant survival benefits.