Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema Research Articles

Breast cancer related lymphoedema: a review of contemporary preventive strategies.

Secondary lymphoedema remains an incurable long-term complication of breast cancer treatment. Prevention is our best chance against this debilitating condition. Strategies for selective de-escalation of oncological therapies have continued to evolve over the last few decades to reduce the incidence of this feared complication. In this manuscript we first review the current strategies in de-escalation of axillary treatment. We then review the current evidence for immediate lymphatic reconstruction in those high-risk patients who cannot be spared from more aggressive axillary management.

Clinical outcome is unlinked to injection of adipose-derived regenerative cells in the axilla of breast cancer-related lymphedema patients.

Injection of autologous adipose-derived regenerative cells (ADRCs) combined with lipotransfer has been suggested to alleviate symptoms in diseases including breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). We recently performed a randomized controlled trial injecting lipoaspirate with ADRCs into the axilla of BCRL patients, and here we aimed in the intervention group to define in an unbiased fashion whether ADRC injection was linked to the clinical outcome. 39 BCRL patients received lipotransfer assisted with autologous ADRCs (4.20 × 107 ± 1.75 × 107 cells) whereas 41 BCRL patients were included for placebo treatment. At 12month follow-up, we assessed quality of life, lymphangiography, and bioimpedance enclosing 59 outcome parameters. Multifactorial analysis of clinical outcomes was used to define responders and non-responders to the intervention, and collected ADRCs from these patient groups were analyzed by single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq). Unbiased multifactorial analysis ranked and defined the clinical outcomes (Sf36 physical change, L-Dex Lymph Change, ICG mdanderson change) with the highest effect on BCRL patients. The 10 patients with the highest- and lowest effect (five responders and five non-responders) were included in the study. No difference between non-responders and responders were observed for injected ADRC number/size/viability (p > 0.05). In scRNAseq, we did not find any major difference (p > 0.05) between groups in ADRC composition regarding adipose derived stem cells, endothelial-, smooth muscle-, T-, B-, mast cells as well as macrophages, which was verified by flow cytometry. Differential subcluster gene expression between groups were for 92.5% of genes, including those encoding secretory proteins, below the threshold of 1.5, and thus neglible. Together this suggested that the ADRC phenotype was indistinguishable between BCRL responders and non-responders to the intervention. Our data suggest that the ADRC injection and ADRC phenotype or heterogeneity have no effect on the clinical outcomes on BCRL, and ADRC assisted lipotranfer for BCRL should therefore not be considered currently.

Quantitative analysis of pressure levels in manual lymphatic drainage across stages of breast cancer-related lymphedema: implications for optimized treatment protocols.

To quantify the pressure levels necessary for effective Manual Lymphatic Drainage (MLD) in managing Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema (BCRL) across various stages, and to contribute to the development of standardized protocols for MLD therapy. The study included 42 patients with BCRL (Stages I-III) and 14 certified lymphedema therapists. Forearms and upper arm circumferences were measured pre and post a 21-day MLD intervention. A tactile sensor system recorded the applied pressure during treatment. The data were preprocessed and statistically analyzed to assess pressure patterns and their stage-specific impacts on lymphedema. The mean age of the patients was 52.4years, and that of the therapists was 39.1years. A statistically significant reduction in arm circumference was observed post-MLD treatment (P < 0.05). The pressure applied varied across stages: I forearm 16.5-20.1mmHg, I upper arm 16.1-20.7mmHg; II forearm 16.6-19.8mmHg, II upper arm 19.7-23.8mmHg; III forearm 29.3-34.3mmHg, III upper arm 29.7-34.3mmHg. No statistically significant difference was found between forearm and upper arm treatment pressures within Stages I (P = 0.283) and III (P = 0.08), while Stage II exhibited a significant difference (P < 0.001). Across the same treatment area, pressures for Stages I and II in the forearm were significantly lower than those in Stage III (P < 0.001). The treatment pressure differences between forearm stages I and II were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Differences in upper arm treatment pressures across Stages I, II, and III were also statistically significant (P < 0.001). The study provides quantitative evidence on the pressure ranges needed for MLD across different stages of BCRL. It highlights the importance for stage-specific pressure adjustments to optimize treatment outcomes. These findings contribute to the existing body of knowledge on MLD and offer valuable data that could inform the development of rehabilitation technologies, including intelligent robots and visualization systems, as well as enhance therapist training programs.

ASO Author Reflections: Infection and Skin Trauma Incrementally Increase the Risk of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.

ASO Author Reflections: Infection and Skin Trauma Incrementally Increase the Risk of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.

Exercise benefits following breast cancer surgery – a narrative review

One of the most common cancer diseases among women is breast cancer. Treatment following breast cancer surgery leads to many complications. Exercises play an important role from the immediate post operative period which could help in preventing post-surgical complications. Prevention of complications improves the quality of life of women. Though women feel that performing exercises following treatment are difficult there are many positive effects of exercises. This current study was done with an objective to analyse the various effects of exercises especially on the resisted exercises in preventing Secondary lymphedema (SL) and to focus light on the benefits of the exercises during and after chemotherapy. Literature search of PubMed, Clinical Key and Google scholar was performed. For women recovering from breast cancer surgery, resisted exercises, either by themselves or in combination with aerobic exercises, were safe and effective. These exercises improved upper body strength, increased endurance, decreased adipose tissue, decreased waist and hip circumferences, increased lean body mass, improved cardiovascular fitness, improved self-esteem, and decreased depression. Women with breast cancer related lymphedema had a considerable improvement in pain after performing deep breathing exercises combined with upper limb movements. Exercise can help mitigate the negative effects of chemotherapy and helps to overcome cancer related fatigue. Along with conventional exercises including range of motion exercises and aerobic exercises, moderate-intensity upper body resistance exercises are recommended to be a part of exercise protocol prescribed and educated to the women following breast cancer surgery for them to lead a better quality of life.

Evolving Role of Lymphedema Surgery on Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Multi-Institutional Algorithmic Approach.

Background/Objectives: Recent advancements in breast cancer treatment have led to increased survival rates, prompting a shift towards addressing breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Despite the evolving role of lymphatic surgery in breast reconstruction, there is limited literature evaluating the current role of lymphatic surgery in breast reconstruction. This review aims to evaluate the state of lymphatic surgery in breast reconstruction, analyzing surgical techniques and proposing a multi-institutional algorithmic approach. Methods: Through a search and screening of literature, data regarding the study type, type of operation (bypass, pLVB/ILR/LYMPHA, VLNT, or a combination of treatments), and clinical outcomes were collected. Results: The systematic review included 184 studies. Overall, the number of publications on lymphatic surgery increased from 4.4 per year (2010-2016) to 21.1 per year since 2017. The most published procedure was vascularized lymph node transfer (34.6%), followed by preventive lymphatic surgery (31.4%), therapeutic lymphovenous bypass (23.3%), and combined breast and lymphatic reconstruction (10.7%). While VLNT was the most published procedure, preventive surgery has been the most published topic since 2020, with 11.7 articles per year since. Similarly, there has been an increase in studies on combined lymphatic surgery and breast reconstruction in the last five years, with 16 articles published. Conclusions: The role of lymphatic surgery in breast cancer patients is evolving, with an increasing emphasis on preventive procedures and combined reconstructive approaches. However, our study shows that the current literature is predominantly based on lower-level evidence, highlighting the need for more randomized controlled trials to establish stronger clinical recommendations.

Body Mass Index and Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

This study aims to evaluate the association between body mass index (BMI) and the incidence of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 1464 breast cancer patients treated at The Third Hospital of Nanchang between 2018 and 2021. Patients were categorized based on BMI (<25, 25 to < 30, ≥ 30 kg/m²). Variables such as axillary lymph node dissection, infections, radiotherapy, and comorbidities were taken into account. The incidence of BCRL was 23.4%. Higher BMI was associated with increased risk of BCRL, with significant incidence rates observed at 1, 2, and 3 years in the higher BMI groups. Multivariate analysis confirmed BMI as an independent risk factor for BCRL. Elevated BMI is associated with increased BCRL risk and decreased BCRL-free survival, underscoring the significance of weight management in breast cancer care.

Reproducibility of Thermography for Measuring Skin Temperature of Upper Limbs in Breast Cancer Survivors

Background/Objectives: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a chronic condition that has early diagnosis as a critical component for proper treatment. Thermography, a non-invasive imaging method, is considered a promising complementary tool for the diagnosis and monitoring of BCRL, especially in subclinical stages. The present study aimed to evaluate the intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility of thermography for measuring the skin temperature of the upper limbs (UL) of women with and without BCRL. Methods: This study, conducted with women who underwent a unilateral mastectomy, assessed BCRL using indirect volumetry. Maximum, minimum, and mean skin temperatures were measured in five regions of interest (ROI) of each UL (C1, C2, C3, C4, and Cup) in four different postures. Reproducibility measures were assessed using an intraclass correlation coefficient, 95% confidence interval, and coefficient of variation. Results: The sample comprised 30 women; 14 were diagnosed with BCRL. A total of 120 thermograms were recorded in different postures, and 3600 ROI were analyzed in the UL with and without BRCL. The intraclass correlation coefficient of the analyses indicated intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility from good to excellent (0.82 to 1.00) for all skin temperatures evaluated (maximum, minimum, and mean). The coefficient of variation for all measures was below 10%, indicating low variability. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that thermography shows good-to-excellent reproducibility across multiple postures and regions of interest, reinforcing its potential as a non-invasive and reliable method for assessing lymphedema in breast cancer survivors. This study establishes a foundation for incorporating thermography into clinical practice for early BCRL detection, particularly in subclinical stages, thus improving patient management and outcomes.

Are post-operative preventative measures effective in breast cancer-related lymphedema? A systematic review

Are post-operative preventative measures effective in breast cancer-related lymphedema? A systematic review

Evidence-based recommendations regarding risk reduction practices for people at risk of or with breast cancer-related lymphedema: consensus from an expert panel.

Several recent studies have investigated the validity of precautionary practices for lymphedema risk reduction after breast cancer treatment, such as avoidance of blood pressure measurements, skin puncture, blood draws, and use of prophylactic compression during air travel. Other studies have elucidated risk factors for breast cancer-related lymphedema, such as axillary lymph node dissection and skin infection (cellulitis). Combining the current evidence base with the consensus opinion of lymphatic experts assembled at the American Cancer Society/Lymphology Association of North America Summit in October 2023, updated evidence-based risk reduction recommendations are presented for those with or at risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema. Recommendation topics include prospective surveillance, patient education, individual risk factors, exercise, blood pressure, skin care and hygiene, skin puncture and blood draws, surgical procedures, prophylactic compression, air travel, and hot climate and sauna. These recommendations will help inform education and medical choices for individuals treated for breast cancer who are at risk of or diagnosed with breast cancer-related lymphedema. More high-quality evidence is required to allow the development of risk reduction recommendations for other cancer types such as gynecological, melanoma, and head and neck. It is recommended that clinicians and organizations serving people at risk of or with lymphedema align risk reduction guidelines with the evidence-based recommendations provided within this consensus document and companion manuscripts from the American Cancer Society/Lymphology Association of North America Lymphedema Summit: Forward Momentum: Future Steps in Lymphedema Management.

The Effects of a Web Application for Reducing the Risk of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema on Health Literacy and Self-Efficacy in Managing Symptoms Among Patients With Breast Cancer.

This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of a web application on health literacy and self-efficacy in managing arm oedema symptoms among patients with breast cancer. The research was carried out in four phases as follows: Phase 1, using a qualitative approach to explore problems and information needs in educating breast cancer patients through in-depth interviews with 10 professional nurses who had experiences in caring for breast cancer patients and 20 breast cancer patients. Data were analysed by content analysis; Phase 2, designing and developing a web application and confirming its quality by five experts with experience caring for breast cancer patients; Phase 3, testing the web application with five breast cancer patients; and Phase 4, examining the effectiveness of a web application in breast cancer patients using a quasiexperimental research method. Patients were divided into 15 persons in control and 15 in intervention groups, a total of 30 persons. The tools used in the study consisted of (1) a web application on practices for reducing risk for arm oedema after breast cancer treatment, (2) a health literacy assessment tool, (3) a self-efficacy for managing symptoms questionnaire and (4) a web application satisfaction questionnaire. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-square and t test. Qualitative findings: The web application should cover patients' and nurses' views on arm oedema causes, assessment, prevention and self-care for managing swelling after breast cancer treatment. Characteristics of a web application required: large text, bright colours, clear visibility, accompanying pictures or videos, using simple language without official terminology, easy to access, convenient to use, concise, interesting content and shareable to others. Quantitative findings: The intervention group had significantly higher health literacy and self-efficacy in managing symptom scores than before the trial (p < 0.001). Sample groups were satisfied with the developed web application at a high level. When considering each item, it was found that all items were rated at high levels. Two items with the same highest score were ease of use and the attractiveness of the presentation style. This web application, aimed at reducing the risk of arm oedema after breast cancer treatment, is an effective tool for educating all hospitalized patients. In addition, further research should be conducted to monitor the sustainability of long-term and clinical outcomes.

Is axillary web syndrome a risk factor for breast cancer-related lymphedema of the upper extremity? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

To systematically review the available literature to determine if axillary web syndrome (AWS) is a risk factor for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) of the upper extremity. The study is Prospero-registered (ID CRD42024508169) and follows PRISMA guidelines. Ovid MEDLINE, PubMED, CINAHL, Embase, clinicaltrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched February 24, 2024. Original studies including a cohort of females > 18 years of age diagnosed with AWS after breast cancer surgery and assessing BCRL outcome were included. Scoping, mapping, systematic or qualitative reviews, dissertations without peer-review and conference abstracts were excluded. Methodological quality was assessed using the Modified Downs and Black Checklist and overall certainty in the body of evidence was assessed using Cochrane's GRADE criteria (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Nine cohort studies representing 3218 participants were included. The median incidence of AWS and BCRL was 31.79% (IQR 8.90%) and 14.29% (IQR 19.01%), respectively, across all studies. Pooled analysis indicated an odds ratio of 1.19 (95% confidence interval 0.60,2.37), with substantial heterogeneity across studies (Chi2 p < 0.0001, I2 = 82%). Methodological quality of the included studies was poor to fair, and there was very low certainty evidence indicating no difference in AWS for BCRL risk. The strongest study included, found that AWS more than doubles BCRL risk in the upper extremity. The available evidence base cannot definitively determine whether AWS imparts risk of BCRL. AWS should be considered a potential risk factor for BCRL, until definitive conclusions from future research are available.

The influence of non-cancer-related risk factors on the development of cancer-related lymphedema: a rapid review.

Extensive research supports an evidence-base for cancer treatment-related risk factors, including extent of lymph node dissection and use of radiotherapy, as contributing to secondary lymphedema. Additionally, comorbidities, such as higher body mass index, and vascular-related conditions are identified to further augment risk. While social determinants of health (SDOH) and socioeconomic factors are widely regarded as influencing an individual's healthcare outcomes, including cancer risk and survival, these factors have not been explored as risk factors for developing secondary lymphedema. A rapid literature review explored the current evidence for SDOH as risk factors for lymphedema. Studies that were published over the last 10years and that specifically analyzed social factors as variables associated with lymphedema were included. Studies that only characterized the social determinants of the study population were not included. Forty-nine studies were identified through a rapid literature review, and 13 studies that expressly analyzed social determinants as risk factors for secondary lymphedema were reviewed and extracted. All studies were conducted in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema. Social risk factors included race, educational level, insurance type, and income level. These are consistent with the socioeconomic inequalities related to cancer survival. SDOH may influence the risk of developing cancer treatment-related health conditions like secondary lymphedema. Research trials studying cancer treatment-related conditions should collect consistent and robust data across social, behavioral, environmental, and economic domains and should analyze these variables to understand their contribution to study endpoints. Risk prediction modeling could be a future pathway to better incorporate social determinants, along with medical and co-morbidity data, to holistically understand lymphedema risk.

Effect of Complex Decongestive Therapy Program on Volume and Functioning in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Global Effect and Predicting Factors.

Background: The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the effect of a first and repeated complex decongestive therapy (CDT) program on volume and functioning in patients with unilateral breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) and to identify whether the volume before treatment and/or the number of previous treatment influence outcomes. Methods and Results: In total, 100 and 42 patients with BCRL treated by 499 CDT (6 hours a day during 5 consecutive days) between April 2018 and December 2021 were included. Patients were assessed using volume including percentage of excess volume and percentage reduction in excess volume and lymph-International Classification of Functioning-UL questionnaire. After CDT, a significant reduction in BCRL volume (50%) and improvement in functioning (30%) were observed. The volume reduction was greater when the BCRL volume before treatment was low (10%-20%) and when CDT was performed for the first time. The functioning improvement was identical whatever the volume is before treatment and the number of previous CDT. Conclusion: A greater volume reduction after CDT was obtained in BCRL with low volume before treatment and after the first CDT. Such findings support the need for early intensive BCRL treatment to control volume and improve functioning.

Effects of dietary habits and catheterization type on breast cancer-related lymphedema: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundUnderstanding the factors that contribute to variability in breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is an important first step in developing targeted interventions to improve quality of life in breast cancer patients. Although previous research studies have has identified many risk factors for BCRL, dietary habits and catheterization type have rarely been studied until the present.AimThis study aims to explore the effects of nursing factors such as dietary habits and catheterization type on breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL).MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included 1,476 breast cancer patients who underwent surgery between January 1, 2012, and September 1, 2020. Lymphedema was assessed with a validated self-report questionnaire. All research data were obtained from medical records and a follow-up database. Multivariate Cox regression was conducted to explore the effects of dietary habits and catheterization type on BCRL.ResultsThe results showed an increased risk for BCRL among breast cancer patients who followed a high-fat diet prehospitalization (HR = 2.47; 95% CI = 1.55–3.94; P < 0.001), indwelling totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAPs) compared with indwelling needles (HR = 0.56; 95% CI = 0.35–0.90;P = 0.017) or indwelling peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) (HR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.45–1.05; P = 0.086).ConclusionHigh-fat diet pre-hospitalization was an independent risk factor for lymphedema. The TIVAPs did not exert a protective effect on lymphedema compared with the PICC and indwelling needle. This study finding offers new insights to develop targeted interventions to decrease the incidence of lymphedema.

Accuracy of Infrared Thermography in Diagnosing Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.

Background/Objectives: Infrared thermography (IRT) is an imaging technique used in clinical practice to detect changes in skin temperature caused by several dysfunctions, including breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Thus, the present study aimed to assess the reproducibility and accuracy of IRT in diagnosing BCRL. Methods: This cross-sectional study included participants who underwent a unilateral mastectomy and used indirect volumetry for lymphedema detection. IRT analysis was recorded in four positions, analyzing maximum, mean, and minimum temperatures, as well as the temperature differences between the upper limbs. The analysis encompassed reliability, agreement, accuracy, and the establishment of cut-off points for sensitivity and specificity. A total of 88 upper limbs were included; 176 thermograms were captured, and 1056 regions of interest were analyzed. Results: IRT presented excellent intra- and inter-rater reproducibility and reliability with excellent intraclass correlation coefficient values (0.99 to 1.00). In addition, this assessment reached a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 56%; the cut-off point considered a temperature difference of -0.45 °C. Conclusions: IRT was a reliable and reproducible assessment, and the temperature difference between the upper limbs evidenced moderate accuracy. Thus, IRT is recommended as a complementary technique for detecting BCRL.

Improvement of quality of life on breast cancer-related lymphedema patients through a postmastectomy care program in Mexico: a prospective study.

To assess whether health-related quality of life (HRQOL) improved through a postmastectomy care program focused on breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) protection/awareness. Postoperative breast cancer patients were enrolled prospectively (February-2018 to September-2019) at Nursing and Obstetrics Faculty, Durango, Mexico. Sociodemographic/clinical characteristics, arm measurements, and HRQOL evaluation with Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer were collected at baseline and after six follow-up assessments between six-to-twelve-month postmastectomy. Lymphedema was verified through circometry. Descriptive analysis and McNemar-Bowker test were used to evaluate paired differences in HRQOL. Subgroup analysis was conducted to assess sociodemographic/clinical characteristics of BCRL using Pearson's chi-squared or Fisher exact test along with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). All tests were two-sided with P-values < 0.05 considered statistically significant. One-hundred-two patients developed BCRL (incidence 66.2%, n = 154). All dimensions of HRQOL improved after the postmastectomy care program (P < 0.05). The subgroup analysis indicated that elementary academic degree (OR = 2.40, 95%CI: 1.01-5.69), laborer (OR = 9.85, 95%CI: 3.30-29.3), and total mastectomy (OR = 4.23, 95%CI: 1.20-14.9) were more associated with BCRL (P < 0.05). Conversely, high school academic degree (OR = 0.46, 95%CI: 0.22-0.94), married status (OR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.21-0.86), housewife (OR = 0.27, 95%CI: 0.12-0.61), professional occupation (OR = 0.10, 95%CI: 0.01-0.64), and having no comorbidities (OR = 0.31, 95%CI: 0.15-0.63) were less associated with BCRL (P < 0.05). Although HRQOL improved through the postmastectomy care program, our findings suggest that lower education, working as a laborer, and total mastectomy may be more associated with BCRL. Continuing research may uncover liabilities among BCRL patients within limited-resources settings.

Breast cancer-related upper limb lymphoedema: an overview

Melanie Thomas provides an update on management of lympoedema in those with breast cancer

Navigating Lymphedema: The Impact of Indocyanine Green Lymphography on Personalized Therapy Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients

AimTo evaluate the role of Indocyanine Green Lymphography (ICG_L) in the early diagnosis and personalized management of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) among high-risk breast cancer (BC) survivors. MethodsPatients who admitted to the UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital Lymphedema Program between October 2018 and December 2021 with episodic symptoms were enrolled into the study. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes were prospectively collected and retrospectively analysed. Lymphatic flow disruptions were identified and guided personalized therapeutic interventions were guided by ICG_L. ResultsAmong 154 BC survivors, 184 arms were evaluated. Initial ICG_L showed 57.1% had no lymphedema, while 42.9% were classified as stage 1 to 3 lymphedema. Early diagnosis and personalized interventions provided improved outcomes, with only 4.3% developing clinical lymphedema after a median follow-up of 27 months. Patients exhibited stable or improved symptoms with individualized treatments such as manual lymphatic drainage, compression therapies, and physiotherapy. ConclusionICG_L evaluation is essential for patients at high-risk of developing BCRL. Early diagnosis before clinical onset of lymphedema, and ICG_L guided therapy significantly enhances the clinical outcomes and improves lymphedema management. Micro AbstractBreast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a common complication following breast cancer treatment, characterized by chronic swelling and functional impairment. This study investigates the role of indocyanine green lymphography (ICG_L) for early BCRL detection among high-risk breast cancer survivors. By identifying subclinical lymphatic disruptions, personalized physical therapy interventions are implemented, leading to improved patient outcomes. With a median follow-up of 27 months, only 4.3% of patients developed clinical BCRL, highlighting the efficacy of early diagnosis and tailored preventive strategies in managing lymphedema progression.

Breast cancer-related lymphoedema: advances and outstanding issues.

Optimal management of breast cancer-related lymphoedema (BCRL), a common and debilitating complication of surgery and radiotherapy, depends on early detection, personalised risk assessment and proactive intervention. For instance, a recent review advises healthcare professionals to reframe the narrative about the daily-living skin trauma risks away from 'what to avoid' to 'what to do'. Another review recommends daily, or nearly daily, exercise at home to reduce lymphoedema severity. However, several questions await full answers. There is, for instance, no consensus regarding the most appropriate surgical technique for preventing BCRL. This feature summarises some recent papers updating healthcare professionals about BCRL.