Breast Cancer-free Survival Research Articles

Estrogen levels in young women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer on ovarian function suppression therapy

Ovarian function suppression (OFS) benefits young women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer but they are at risk for ovarian function breakthrough. We assessed endocrine effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) treatment in a prospective cohort of patients aged ≤ 40 years with HR-positive breast cancer. Plasma estradiol (E2), estrone, and follicule-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels were measured from blood samples drawn 1 and 4 years after diagnosis. Patient characteristics, invasive breast cancer-free survival (iBCFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between those with and without E2 > 2.72 pg/mL during GnRHa treatment. Among eligible patients, 54.7% (46/84) and 60% (15/25) had E2 > 2.72 pg/mL at 1 and 4 years, respectively. Factors associated with E2 > 2.72 pg/mL at 1 year were no prior chemotherapy (P = 0.045) and tamoxifen use (P = 0.009). After a median follow-up of 7 years, among patients with stage I-III breast cancer (N = 74), iBCFS events were seen in 6 (8.1%) with E2 > 2.72 pg/mL and 5 (6.8%) with E2 ≤ 2.72 pg/mL (P = 0.893). Among patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer (N = 12), 6 (50%) with E2 > 2.72 pg/mL and 3 (25%) with E2 ≤ 2.72 pg/mL died during follow-up (P = 0.052). Larger studies exploring the clinical implications of incomplete E2 suppression by GnRHa are needed to ensure optimal OFS treatment strategies are being employed for this population.

Development of a Web-Based Interactive Tool for Visualizing Breast Cancer Clinical Trial Tolerability Data.

Longitudinal patient tolerability data collected as part of randomized controlled trials are often summarized in a way that loses information and does not capture the treatment experience. To address this, we developed an interactive web application to empower clinicians and researchers to explore and visualize patient tolerability data. We used adverse event (AE) data (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from the NSABP-B35 phase III clinical trial, which compared anastrozole with tamoxifen for breast cancer-free survival, to demonstrate the tools. An interactive web application was developed using R and the Shiny web application framework that generates Sankey diagrams to visualize AEs and PROs using four tools: AE Explorer, PRO Explorer, Cohort Explorer, and Custom Explorer. To illustrate how users can use the interactive tool, examples for each of the four applications are presented using data from the NSABP-B35 phase III trial and the NSABP-B30 trial for the Custom Explorer. In the AE and PRO explorers, users can select AEs or PROs to visualize within specified time periods and compare across treatments. In the cohort explorer, users can select a subset of patients with a specific symptom, severity, and treatment received to visualize the trajectory over time within a specified time interval. With the custom explorer, users can upload and visualize structured longitudinal toxicity and tolerability data. We have created an interactive web application and tool for clinicians and researchers to explore and visualize clinical trial tolerability data. This adaptable tool can be extended for other clinical trial data visualization and incorporated into future patient-clinician interactions regarding treatment decisions.

Phase III study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GLSI-100 (GP2 + GM-CSF) in patients with breast cancer with residual disease or high-risk PCR after both neo-adjuvant and postoperative adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy: Flamingo-01.

TPS617 Background: GP2 is a biologic nine amino acid peptide of the HER2/ neu protein delivered in combination with Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) that stimulates an immune response targeting HER2/neu expressing cancers, the combination known as GLSI-100. Of the 146 patients that have been treated with GLSI-100 over 4 clinical trials, GLSI-100 was well-tolerated and no serious adverse events observed were considered related to the immunotherapy. Methods: This Phase III trial is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, multi-center study. After 1 year of trastuzumab-based therapy, 6 intradermal injections of GLSI-100 or placebo will be administered over the first 6 months and 5 subsequent boosters will be administered over the next 2.5 years for a total of 11 injections over 3 years. The participant duration of the trial will be 3 years treatment plus 1 additional year follow-up for a total of 4 years following the first year of treatment with trastuzumab-based therapy. Patients will be stratified based on residual disease status at surgery, hormone receptor status and region. Study size, interim analysis: Approximately 498 patients will be enrolled. To detect a hazard ratio of 0.3 in invasive breast cancer free survival (IBCFS), 28 events will be required. An interim analysis for superiority and futility will be conducted when at least 14 events have occurred. This sample size provides 80% power if the annual rate of events in placebo patients is 2.4% or greater. Up to 100 non-HLA-A*02 subjects will be enrolled in an open-label arm. The patient population is defined by these key eligibility criteria: HER2/neu positive and HLA-A*02; residual disease or high risk pCR (Stage III at presentation) post neo-adjuvant therapy; exclude Stage IV; completed at least 90% of planned trastuzumab-based therapy. Trial objectives: To determine if GP2 therapy increases IBCFS; to assess the safety profile of GP2; and to monitor immunologic responses to treatment and assess relationship to efficacy and safety. Study status: The study has been initiated at a number of sites in the US. The study is also expected to be opened in Spain, France, Germany, Italy, and Poland. Clinical trial information: NCT05232916 .

A phase III trial evaluating addition of adjuvant chemotherapy to ovarian function suppression + endocrine therapy in premenopausal women with pN0-1, HR+/HER2- breast cancer (BC) and oncotype recurrence score (RS) ≤25 (OFSET): NRG-BR009.

TPS612 Background: The TAILORx and RxPONDER trials demonstrated that RS identifies many postmenopausal pts with node-neg and node-pos BC and RS ≤25, who do not benefit from addition of ACT to endocrine therapy (ET). Both trials also showed that certain subsets of premenopausal pts (node-neg/high clinical risk/RS 16-20, node-neg/RS 21-25, and node-pos/RS ≤25) benefited from adding ACT to ET. Most premenopausal pts in these trials did not receive ovarian function suppression (OFS) as part of their ET regimen. Given the observed benefit from OFS in high-risk premenopausal pts with HR+/HER2- BC in the SOFT/TEXT trials, many questioned whether all or part of the observed ACT benefit in the TAILORx/RxPONDER trials may have been the result of chemotherapy-induced OFS. To address this question, we developed OFSET, a phase III, multicenter clinical trial comparing OFS+ET v ACT+OFS+ET. Methods: We hypothesize that addition of ACT to OFS+ET is superior to OFS+ET in improving invasive breast cancer-free survival (IBCFS) among premenopausal, early-stage BC pts with HR+/HER2- tumors, and a 21-gene RS between 16-25 (for pN0 pts) and 0-25 (for pN1 pts). Secondary objectives include invasive disease-free survival, overall survival, distant recurrence-free interval, breast cancer-free interval, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Pts must be node-neg with RS 16-20 (plus high clinical risk), or RS 21-25, or have 1-3 positive nodes with RS ≤25. Stratification is by nodal status/RS status (pN0 RS 16-25 v pN1 RS 0-15 and pN1 RS 16-25), intent to receive CDK4/6 inhibitor (yes; no), and age (18-39 v ≥40). Pts are randomized after surgery to either OFS+ET or ACT+OFS+ET. ET is an aromatase inhibitor (AI). Choice is per investigator discretion; tamoxifen is allowed if AI is not tolerated or if OFS is incomplete. Radiotherapy will be administered per investigator discretion per protocol guidelines. The HRQOL substudy will assess differences in severe menopausal symptoms, measured by the FACT ESS-19 score between arms, as well as increased pain severity (PROMIS). Blood and tumor specimens will be collected for future research. Accrual of 3,960 pts is anticipated to be completed in 7 yrs, 7 mos. Per NSABP B-28 and RxPONDER data, 5yr IBCFS of pN1 pts on the ACT+OFS+ET arm is estimated at 92.3%. Based on TAILORx data, 5yr IBCFS of pN0 pts on the ACT arm is ~95%. Assuming 56% of pts to be pN0 and 44% pN1, and a 0.5% annual loss-to-follow-up rate, the definitive analyses to detect a hazard ratio: 0.75 with ACT+OFS+ET v OFS+ET, with one-sided α of 0.025 and 80% power, will require 380 IBCFS events, expected to occur~11 yrs after study initiation. OFSET was activated Aug 2023. Clinical trial information: NCT05879926 .

Abstract PO3-18-11: A011801 (CompassHER2 RD): Postneoadjuvant T-DM1 + tucatinib/placebo in patients with residual HER2-positive invasive breast cancer

Abstract Background: Patients with HER2+ early breast cancer (EBC) and invasive residual disease (RD) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) have a higher risk of relapse than patients who have a pathologic complete response (pCR). Escalation of therapy in patients with RD using post-neoadjuvant T-DM1 has become the new standard of care, leading to improved invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), but patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative or nodal RD have suboptimal outcomes, and central nervous system recurrences are a challenge. More effective treatment strategies are urgently needed. Alliance A011801 (CompassHER2 RD) is an escalation trial for patients with high-risk HER2+ RD after neoadjuvant systemic therapy, evaluating the addition of the HER2 selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) tucatinib to post-neoadjuvant T-DM1. Methods: Eligibility and Intervention: Patients with high-risk HER2+ RD (i.e., ER-, node-positive, or both) after a predefined course of neoadjuvant HER2-directed treatment are randomized 1:1 to adjuvant T-DM1 + placebo, vs. T-DM1 and tucatinib with adjuvant RT +/- ET. Eligibility criteria include completion of ≥ 6 cycles of NAT, including ≥ 9 weeks of paclitaxel and trastuzumab +/- pertuzumab. All chemotherapy (CT) must be completed preoperatively unless participating in EA1181 (~15-30% will be participants in the CompassHER2 pCR de-escalation companion trial [NCT04266249]; these patients must receive postoperative CT to complete ≥ 6 cycles prior to enrollment on A011801). Patients who received prior HER2-targeted TKIs or antibody-drug conjugates are ineligible. Objectives: The primary objective is to determine if iDFS is improved with addition of tucatinib to T-DM1 in patients with HER2+ EBC with RD after neoadjuvant systemic therapy; secondary endpoints include overall survival, breast cancer free survival, distant recurrence-free survival, brain metastases-free survival and disease-free survival. Correlative objectives include the association of i) tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TILs) levels in the primary tumor and RD with iDFS, ii) TILs with tucatinib benefit, iii) iDFS and circulating tumor cells (CTC) at serial timepoints and iv) the magnitude of benefit of tucatinib (iDFS) in patients with/without detectable pretreatment CTCs. Quality of life and pharmacokinetic endpoints are also being evaluated. Statistics: A011801 is a prospective, double-blind, randomized, phase III superiority trial; stratified by i) receipt of postoperative CT (Y/N), ii) hormone receptor-status (+/-), and iii) pathologic lymph node status (+/-). The study targets an absolute difference of 5% in iDFS (control vs. experimental arm 82% & 87%, HR = 0.7), with a two-sided alpha of 0.05 and power of 80%. The sample size is 981; target accrual = 1031 patients; activation and estimated completion dates are 01/6/21 and ~ 01/2028. Accrual as of 7/10/2023: 438 patients. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; Seagen Inc; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04457596 Citation Format: Ciara O'Sullivan, Karla Ballman, Linda McCall, Tyler Zemla, Anna Weiss, Melissa Mitchell, Victoria Blinder, Nadine Tung, William Irvin, Myounghee Lee, Sailaja Kamaraju, Matthew Goetz, W. Fraser Symmans, Virginia Borges, Ian Krop, Ann Partridge, Lisa Carey. A011801 (CompassHER2 RD): Postneoadjuvant T-DM1 + tucatinib/placebo in patients with residual HER2-positive invasive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-18-11.

Abstract PO4-19-01: The SURVIVE-HERoes trial – a secondary adjuvant treatment intervention study with trastuzumab-deruxtecan in patients with HER2 positive/HER2 low early breast cancer and a molecular relapse, based on a positive ctDNA result

Abstract Background: Despite current adjuvant treatment strategies, ≥ 20% of patients with early breast cancer (EBC) experience a metastatic relapse. In the new era of highly effective antibody drug conjugates (ADCs), secondary adjuvant treatment options for EBC patients at a high risk of relapse arise. The ADC trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd) has so far shown promising efficacy in patients with HER2-positive and HER2-low metastatic breast cancer (DESTINY Breast 03 and -04 trial) and is currently tested in the post-neoadjuvant setting in patients with non-pCR (DESTINY Breast 05 (TRUDY) trial). However, to successfully apply ADCs as a secondary adjuvant treatment, identification of patients who would benefit the most is required. The detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) using liquid biopsy, e.g. ctDNA, may offer a promising approach for patient selection. The efficacy of such a secondary adjuvant treatment in terms of delaying or even preventing distant metastases has yet to be evaluated in a randomized clinical trial. Trial design: The SURVIVE-HERoes trial is a prospective, randomized, open label comparative Phase III superiority trial in patients with intermediate to high-risk HER2-positive or HER2-low EBC, who participate in the large breast cancer surveillance trial SURVIVE (NCT05658172) and experience a molecular relapse as determined by a positive ctDNA result, but show no evidence of relapse or metastatic disease based on imaging by CT-scan and SPECT. In total, 180 patients will be enrolled and randomized with 2:1 allocation to treatment with T-DXd + (only endocrine therapy, if HR positive) versus standard of care (including endocrine treatment +/- CDK4/6-inhibitors or Neratinib). The treatment period lasts 12 months during which ctDNA levels will be repeatedly measured every 3 months (additional ctDNA testing will be performed at month 24 and 36). Stratification factors are HER2-, hormonal- and nodal status. Recruitment start is planned for Q1 2024. Eligibility criteria: Eligible patients are adult females/males, with HER2-positive or HER2-low EBC, as defined in the ASCO-CAP guidelines, and a positive ctDNA result (obtained in the SURVIVE study) that has to be confirmed ≤ 8 weeks before randomization. Primary anti-tumor therapy (surgery, adjuvant chemo- or radiotherapy) has to be completed ≥14 months, (postneo)-adjuvant treatment with anti-HER2-antibodies, T-DM1, Capecitabine, Pembrolizumab and Olaparib ≥ 4 weeks before randomization. Adequate bone marrow and cardiac function and no signs of ILD are mandatory. Statistics: The primary objective of SURVIVE-HERoes is the comparison of ctDNA clearance rates 6 months after randomization between the two study arms, which will be analysed using the chi square test for two independent proportions. Secondary objectives include the comparison of overall survival (OS), invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), breast cancer specific survival (BCSS), invasive breast cancer free survival (IBCFS) and quality of life (QoL) between the study arms as well as the safety and tolerability of T-DXd. Secondary survival endpoints will be estimated by the Kaplan Meier method and compared between the randomization arms using log-rank tests and cox regression models. Special aims: This trial is a proof of principle study with the aim to establish the efficacy of secondary adjuvant treatment with the ADC T-DXd in patients with HER2-positive/HER2-low early breast cancer, who are at high risk of relapse, as evidenced by detection of ctDNA in the blood. Conclusion: If SURVIVE-HERoes is successful, it could lead to a treatment shift towards early intervention with secondary adjuvant targeted therapies following liquid-biopsy based MRD detection. Contact: University Hospital Ulm, Dpt. Obstetrics & Gynecology, Germany, mail: studienzentrale.ufk@uniklinik-ulm.de Citation Format: Sophia Huesmann, Franziska Mergel, Kerstin Pfister, Angelina Fink, Forca Mehmeti, Peter Möller, Tanja Fehm, Volkmar Müller, Klaus Pantel, Thomas Friedl, Andreas Hartkopf, Brigitte Rack, Wolfgang Janni. The SURVIVE-HERoes trial – a secondary adjuvant treatment intervention study with trastuzumab-deruxtecan in patients with HER2 positive/HER2 low early breast cancer and a molecular relapse, based on a positive ctDNA result [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-19-01.

Abstract PO3-19-05: Phase III study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GLSI-100 (GP2 + GM-CSF) in breast cancer patients with residual disease or high-risk PCR after both neo-adjuvant and postoperative adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy, Flamingo-01

Abstract Background: GP2 is a biologic nine amino acid peptide of the HER2/neu protein delivered in combination with Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) that stimulates an immune response targeting HER2/neu expressing cancers, the combination known as GLSI-100. In a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase IIb study, no recurrences were observed in the HER2+ population after 5 years of follow-up, if the patient was treated with GLSI-100, survived, and was followed for more than 6 months (p = 0.0338). Immunotherapy elicited a potent response measured by skin tests and immunological assays. Of the 146 patients that have been treated with GLSI-100 over 4 clinical trials, GLSI-100 was well-tolerated and no serious adverse events observed were considered related to the immunotherapy. Methods: This Phase III trial is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, multi-center study. After 1 year of trastuzumab-based therapy, 6 intradermal injections of GLSI-100 or placebo will be administered over the first 6 months and 5 subsequent boosters will be administered over the next 2.5 years for a total of 11 injections over 3 years. The participant duration of the trial will be 3 years treatment plus 1 additional year follow-up for a total of 4 years following the first year of treatment with trastuzumab-based therapy. Patients will be stratified based on residual disease status at surgery, hormone receptor status and region. Study Size – Interim Analysis: Approximately 498 patients will be enrolled. To detect a hazard ratio of 0.3 in invasive breast cancer free survival (IBCFS), 28 events will be required. An interim analysis for superiority and futility will be conducted when at least 14 events have occurred. This sample size provides 80% power if the annual rate of events in placebo patients is 2.4% or greater. Up to 100 non-HLA-A*02 subjects will be enrolled in an open-label arm. Eligibility Criteria: The patient population is defined by these key eligibility criteria: Objectives: Study Status: The study has been initiated at a number of sites in the US. The study is also expected to be opened in Spain, Germany, and France. Contact Information: Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. Stafford, TX Email: Flamingo-01@greenwichlifesciences.com Website: greenwichlifesciences.com Funding: This trial is supported by Greenwich LifeSciences. Citation Format: Snehal Patel, Jaye Thompson, Mira Patel, F. Joseph Daugherty, Mothaffar Rimawi. Phase III study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GLSI-100 (GP2 + GM-CSF) in breast cancer patients with residual disease or high-risk PCR after both neo-adjuvant and postoperative adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy, Flamingo-01 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-19-05.

Abstract PO5-19-01: The HER2-RADiCAL study (Response ADaptive CAre pLan) – Tailoring treatment for HER2 positive early breast cancer

Abstract Background The presence or absence of residual disease following neoadjuvant systemic anti-cancer therapy (neoSACT) for HER2-positive early breast cancer (HER2+ EBC) provides powerful prognostic information. Pathological complete response (pCR) following neoSACT, particularly in patients with earlier clinical TNM stage at diagnosis, identifies a population with excellent survival outcomes in whom the balance of toxicity associated with the current treatment pathway may be disproportionate to absolute clinical benefit. Aims >HER2-RADiCAL seeks to reduce the treatment burden and healthcare costs of treating HER2+ EBC by testing the hypothesis that pCR can be used as a functional response biomarker to select patients who can safely receive less systemic therapy with minimal/no loss of efficacy. Trial design and eligibility criteria HER2-RADiCAL is a response-directed interventional cohort/threshold-crossing design study embedded within a real-world data-driven clinical pathway model. Patients with ER-positive or negative HER2+ EBC with cT1N1 or cT2N0-1 stage at diagnosis are eligible after completion of standard of care neoSACT and locally determined pCR (ypT0/Tis ypN0). Patients with pathological features consistent with previous malignant involvement in >4 nodes are not eligible. Adjuvant trastuzumab +/- pertuzumab may have continued prior to study entry provided no more than 9 cycles of trastuzumab are received. After registration all participants receive a total of 9 cycles of trastuzumab including those administered prior to study entry. Participants receive no further pertuzumab and no adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant endocrine therapy and radiotherapy are given as per standard of care. Central pathology review of pCR status will be conducted in a subset of cases. A Study Within a Trial (SWAT) will explore identification of factors influencing patient decision-making for participation in studies of response-adapted treatment. Statistical methods The primary endpoint is relapse-free interval. Recruitment of 720 participants over 3.5 years will provide 90% power to exclude an event rate >6.5% at 3 years (expected event rate ≤4%). Secondary endpoints include relapse-free survival, invasive breast cancer-free survival, invasive disease-free survival, distant recurrence-free interval, breast cancer-free interval, overall survival, treatment pathway adherence and cost-effectiveness. An interventional cohort is preferred to a randomised non-inferiority trial based on the known event rate in this population which is sufficiently low such that any deviation from this expected event rate would indicate failure of the reduced therapy strategy. Real-world data driven clinical pathway model Health economic modelling will compare the protocol-driven study cohort with two comparator pathways: a non-response adapted maximum therapy pathway (the standard clinical pathway prior to the study) and a real-world representative pathway derived from anonymised data for all patients treated for HER2+ EBC within the UK NHS. Patient and public involvement Our PPI partners continue to shape this research, holding key roles as trial management group members, overseeing progress of the study, contributing to protocol amendment development, and design and implementation of the SWAT. Current status The first patient was enrolled in December 2021. At 10th July 2023, 25 research sites have opened with 39 participants recruited. Site opening continues with a minimum target of 40. Responding to continued use of anthracycline-based regimens in UK practice, eligibility criteria have recently been extended to permit entry of patients who have received anthracycline-containing neoSACT. For further information contact her2radical-icrctsu@icr.ac.uk. Citation Format: Iain Macpherson, Stuart McIntosh, Lucy Kilburn, Holly Tovey, Laura Moretti, Katie Goddard, Indrani Bhattacharya, Clinton Boyd, Cliona Kirwan, Ciara O'Brien, Duncan Wheatley, Jennifer Glendenning, Mairead MacKenzie, Hilary Stobart, Claire Snowdon, Andrew Wardley, Abeer Shaaban, Peter Hall, David Cameron, Judith Bliss. The HER2-RADiCAL study (Response ADaptive CAre pLan) – Tailoring treatment for HER2 positive early breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-19-01.

Abstract PO2-19-02: NRG-BR009: Phase III Trial Evaluating Addition of Adjuvant Chemotherapy to Ovarian Function Suppression + Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Women with pN0-1, HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer and Oncotype Recurrence Score ≤25 (OFSET)

Abstract Background: Identifying pts with HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) who benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) has been a major research focus over the past 20 years. Development and clinical application of genomic classifiers such as the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) has contributed to the biologic understanding of BC and has refined pt selection for ACT. The TAILORx and RxPONDER clinical trials demonstrated that RS identifies many postmenopausal pts with node-negative and node-positive BC and RS < 25, who do not benefit from the addition of ACT to endocrine therapy (ET). However, both trials also showed that certain subsets of premenopausal pts (node-negative/high clinical risk/RS 16-20, node-negative/RS 21-25, and node-positive/RS < 25) benefited from the addition of ACT to ET. Most premenopausal pts in these two trials did not receive ovarian function suppression (OFS) as part of their ET regimen. Given the observed benefit from OFS in high-risk premenopausal pts with HR-positive/HER2-negative BC in the SOFT and TEXT trials, many questioned whether all or part of the observed ACT benefit in the TAILORx/RxPONDER trials may have been the result of chemotherapy-induced OFS. To address this question, OFSET is a Phase III, multicenter clinical trial evaluating the addition of ACT to OFS+ET vs. OFS+ET alone. Methods: We hypothesize that the addition of ACT to OFS+ET is superior to OFS+ET in improving invasive breast cancer-free survival (IBCFS) among premenopausal, early-stage BC pts with HR-positive/HER2-negative tumors, and a 21-gene RS between 16-25 (for pN0 pts) and 0-25 (for pN1 pts). Secondary objectives include invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), overall survival (OS), distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI), breast cancer-free interval (BCFI), and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Eligible pts must be node-negative with RS 16-20 (plus high clinical risk), or RS 21-25, or have 1-3 positive nodes with RS < 25. Stratification is by nodal status/RS status (pN0 RS 16-25 vs pN1 RS 0-15 and pN1 RS 16-25), intent to receive CDK4/6 inhibitor (yes; no), and age (18-39 vs ≥40). Pts are randomized after surgery to either OFS+ET or ACT followed by OFS+ET. ET is an aromatase inhibitor per investigator discretion, but tamoxifen is allowed if pts do not tolerate the AI or if OFS is incomplete. Radiation therapy will be administered per investigator discretion according to protocol guidelines. The HRQOL sub-study will assess differences in severe menopausal symptoms, measured by the FACT ESS-19 score, between the arms, as well as increased pain severity (PROMIS) during ACT+OFS+ET compared to OFS+ET. Blood and tumor specimens will be collected for future research. The accrual of 3,960 pts is anticipated to be completed in seven years and seven mos. Based on data from NSABP B-28 and RxPONDER, the 5-year IBCFS of pN1 pts on the ACT+OFS+ET arm is estimated at 92.3%. Based on data from TAILORx, the 5-year IBCFS of pN0 pts on the ACT arm is ~95%. Assuming 56% of the pts to be pN0 and 44% pN1, a 0.5% annual loss-to-follow-up rate, the definitive analyses to detect a hazard ratio: 0.75 with ACT+OFS+ET vs. OFS+ET, with one-sided alpha of 0.025 and 80% power will require 380 IBCFS events, which are expected to occur ~11 years after study initiation. The OFSET study is expected to be activated in the third quarter of 2023. Current accrual (06-19-2023) is 0/3,960 Support: U10CA180868, U10CA180822, UG1CA189867, U24CA196067. NCT05879926. Citation Format: Eleftherios Mamounas, Gong Tang, Shannon Puhalla, Sandra Swain, Patricia Ganz, N. Lynn Henry, Reena Cecchini, Sonya Reid, Priya Rastogi, Charles Geyer, Julia White, Amy Clark, Tufia Haddad, Gregory Vidal, Norman Wolmark. NRG-BR009: Phase III Trial Evaluating Addition of Adjuvant Chemotherapy to Ovarian Function Suppression + Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Women with pN0-1, HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer and Oncotype Recurrence Score ≤25 (OFSET) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-19-02.

Intermediate clinical endpoints in early-stage breast cancer: an analysis of individual patient data from the Gruppo Italiano Mammella and Mammella Intergruppo trials

Intermediate clinical endpoints (ICEs) are frequently used as primary endpoint in randomised trials (RCTs). We aim to assess whether changes in different ICEs can be used to predict changes in overall survival (OS) in adjuvant breast cancer trials. Individual patient level data from adjuvant phase III RCTs conducted by the Gruppo Italiano Mammella (GIM) and Mammella Intergruppo (MIG) study groups were used. ICEs were computed according to STEEP criteria. Using a two-stage meta-analytic model, we assessed the surrogacy of each ICE at both the outcome (i.e., OS and ICE are correlated irrespective of treatment) and trial (i.e., treatment effects on ICE and treatment effect on OS are correlated) levels. The following ICEs were considered as potential surrogate endpoints of OS: disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), distant relapse-free survival (DRFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), recurrence-free interval (RFI), distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI), breast cancer-free interval (BCFI), and invasive breast cancer-free survival (IBCFS). The estimates of the degree of correlation were obtained by copula models and weighted linear regression. Kendall's τ and R2≥0.70 were considered as indicators of a clinically relevant surrogacy. Among the 12,397 patients enrolled from November 1992 to July 2012 in six RCTs, median age at enrolment was 57 years (interquartile range (IQR) 49-65). After a median follow-up of 10.3 years (IQR 6.4-14.5), 2131 (17.2%) OS events were observed, with 1390 (65.2%) attributed to breast cancer. At the outcome-level, Kendall's τ ranged from 0.69 for BCFI to 0.84 for DRFS. For DFS, DDFS, DRFS, RFS, RFI, DRFI, BCFI, and IBCFS endpoints, over 95% of the 8-year OS variability was attributable to the variation of the 5-year ICE. At the trial-level, treatment effects for the different ICEs and OS were strongly correlated, with the highest correlation for RFS and DRFS and the lowest for BCFI. Our results provide evidence supporting the use of DFS, DDFS, DRFS, RFS, RFI, DRFI, and IBCFS as primary endpoint in breast cancer adjuvant trials. This analysis was supported by the Italian Association for Cancer Research ("Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro", AIRC; IG 2017/20760) and by Italian Ministry of Health-5×1000 funds (years 2021-2022).

Clinical outcomes after 1 versus 2-3 lines of neoadjuvant therapy in stage III inflammatory breast cancer.

Many stage III inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) patients experience a sufficient response to first-line (1L) neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to allow surgery, while some require additional NAC. We evaluated the pathologic complete response (pCR), breast cancer-free survival (BCFS) and overall survival (OS) among patients requiring 1 vs. 2-3 lines (L) of NAC prior to surgery. Stage III IBC patients from 2 institutions who received 1L or 2-3L of NAC prior to surgery were identified. Hormone receptor and HER2 status, grade, and pCR were evaluated. BCFS and OS were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox models were utilized to estimate the hazard ratio (HR). 808 eligible patients (1997-2020) were identified (median age 51years, median follow-up 69months). 733 (91%) had 1L and 75 (9%) had 2-3L of NAC. Grade III, triple-negative and HER2-positive disease were more prevalent in 2-3L patients. 178 (24%) 1L and 14 (19%) 2-3L patients had pCR. 376 1L patients and 41 2-3L patients had recurrences. The 5-year BCFS was worse for the 2-3L group (33 vs. 46%, HR = 1.37; 95% CI 0.99-1.91). However, in 192 patients with a pCR, BCFS was similar (76 vs. 83% in 1L vs. 2-3L, respectively). There were 308 deaths (276 among 1L and 32 among 2-3L patients). The 5-year OS in 1L vs. 2-3L was 60 vs. 53% (HR = 1.32, 95% CI 0.91-1.93). Among stage III IBC patients, pCR rates were similar, irrespective of the NAC lines number, and BCFS and OS were comparable with pCR after 1L and 2-3L.

21-gene expression assay and clinical outcomes of premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

The prognostic role of the recurrence score (RS) based on the 21-gene expression assay in premenopausal women is not well delineated, and we investigated the association of outcomes and the RS in premenopausal patients who had 21-gene expression assay at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, between June 2005 and July 2018. Invasive breast cancer-free survival (IBCFS) by STEEP version 2.0 was compared according to the RS and clinical risk factors. A total of 554 patients were included in our study and 116 patients (20.9%) had age <40 years, 238 patients (43.0%) had luminal B subtype (Ki67 ≥ 20%), and 83 patients (15.0%) had RS >25. All patients received adjuvant tamoxifen ± chemotherapy. Overall, patients with RS >25 showed trend toward worse IBCFS from multivariable analysis (adjusted HR 1.89 [95% CI: 0.95-3.73], P = .069). When comparing outcomes according to age and luminal subtypes, patients with luminal B subtype and age <40 years (n = 60) showed significantly worse outcomes compared to the others (luminal A or luminal B + age ≥40 years, n = 494; adjusted HR 2.95 [95% CI: 1.49-5.82], log-rank P < .001). Among patients with luminal B subtype and age <40 years, there was no significant association observed between IBCFS and the RS (log-rank P = .51). In conclusion, while RS >25 showed association with poor outcomes in premenopausal women, it may have less prognostic significance among those with luminal B subtype and age <40 years.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring in patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant palbociclib and endocrine therapy: A secondary analysis of the NeoRHEA phase 2 study.

601 Background: Personalized circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assays are being evaluated in early breast cancer (BC). We investigated the value of ctDNA monitoring in the NeoRHEA study. Methods: NeoRhea (NCT03065621) is a single arm phase 2 study in which patients with estrogen receptor (ER)+/HER2- early breast cancer were treated with neoadjuvant palbociclib + endocrine therapy (ET) for 4 months. Plasma samples were collected at four timepoints: pre-treatment (BL), after the first treatment cycle (C1D28), before surgery (Surgery) and one month post Surgery (End of Study). ctDNA detection was evaluated using the personalized RaDaR assay. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed on BL tumor biopsies followed by a personalized assay development using tumor, plasma and normal DNA in order to track up to 48-patient specific somatic variants in plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) using next generation sequencing. Associations between ctDNA detection and BL clinical-pathological characteristics, cell cycle arrest (CCCA) defined as Ki67 ≤2.7% at surgery, residual cancer burden (RCB) rate and breast cancer free survival (BCFS) were investigated. Results: Of 100 patients enrolled, 78 patients and 302 plasma samples were successfully profiled by the RaDaR assay. The number of variants targeted by the assay ranged between 7-48 (median = 25). The median estimated variant allele fraction for ctDNA positive samples was 0.02% (range 0.0009%-0.91%). A total of 42/76 patients were ctDNA positive at BL, 4/76 at C1D28, 4/75 at Surgery and 0/75 at End of Study. Out of 78 patients, 68% were postmenopausal, 78 % had cT2 and 69% cN0 tumors, 20% had multifocal/multicentric tumors, 18% had histological grade 3 tumors, 76% had CCCA (Ki67 not available in 20 patients) and 34% RCB 3 at surgery. ctDNA detection at BL was higher in histological grade 3 tumors (p = 0.03), lower in multifocal/multicentric tumors (p = 0.01), higher in RCB III tumors, (p = 0.01) but was not associated with CCCA. With a median follow-up of 3.8 years (range 1-5 years), 4 patients developed distant and one patient locoregional recurrences. ctDNA detection after one month of treatment (logrank p = 0.02), but not at baseline (p = 0.59) nor at surgery (p = 0.67) was associated with worse BCFS. Conclusions: Detection of ctDNA in early-stage breast cancer is challenging. Our data suggests association of ctDNA detection with some pathological and clinical variables. Independent validation is needed. Clinical trial information: NCT03065621 .

Endpoints reported in phase 3 randomized clinical trials at ASCO 2022.

1570 Background: The goal of phase 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) is to show clinically meaningful benefit for patients. An analysis of phase 3 RCTs presented at the ASCO 2022 Annual Meeting (ASCO22) was undertaken to assess which endpoints were evaluated. Methods: A systematic analysis was undertaken of ASCO22 abstracts from phase 3 RCTs reporting primary, secondary, interim, updated, and subgroup analyses, as well as trials reporting methodology of currently enrolling studies. Trials that reported posthoc, exploratory, biomarker, and retrospective analyses of RCTs were excluded. Information from ASCO22 materials and clinical trial registration websites was recorded by two independent researchers. Results: In total, 166 RCTs were identified: 93 trials with 50,781 enrolled patients and 73 trials expected to enroll 52,098 patients. More trials reported on patients with locally advanced/metastatic cancer (64.5%) compared to localized cancer (35.5%). Funding source was pharmaceutical or biotechnology company in 62%. Within locally advanced/metastatic trials, overall survival (OS) was a primary endpoint in 40%, while progression-free survival (PFS) was a primary or co-primary endpoint in 45% and 13% respectively. Other primary endpoints included (invasive) disease-free survival ((i)DFS), event free survival (EFS), overall response rate and pathological complete response. In trials that did not include OS as a primary endpoint, OS was a secondary endpoint in 88% (n = 56/64). Within the localized group, trials were subdivided into adjuvant, neo-adjuvant, definitive and other categories. Within the adjuvant trials (n = 27), the most common primary endpoint was (i)DFS (37%), followed by OS (15%). Other primary endpoints included recurrence-free survival, invasive breast cancer free survival, metastasis-free survival, EFS, and PFS. Across all trials, quality of life (QOL) was never reported as a primary endpoint, however it was as a secondary or other outcome in 53% for locally advanced/metastatic trials and 42% for localized trials. When comparing the endpoints reported in the ASCO22 abstract and meeting materials with those listed on the trial registration website, discordance was noted in 14%. Conclusions: Phase 3 RCTs presented at ASCO22 represented participation from over 100,000 patients, however, fewer than half in locally advanced/metastatic cancer and fewer than one quarter in localized disease utilized OS as a primary endpoint. QOL was listed as an endpoint in roughly one half of all trials. Endpoints reported did not match registration data in a significant minority. Debate over which endpoints should be used for cancer RCTs should be informed by this data.

Phase III study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GLSI-100 (GP2 + GM-CSF) in breast cancer patients with residual disease or high-risk PCR after both neoadjuvant and postoperative adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy: Flamingo-01.

TPS617 Background: GP2 is a biologic nine amino acid peptide of the HER2/ neu protein delivered in combination with Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) that stimulates an immune response targeting HER2/neu expressing cancers, the combination known as GLSI-100. In a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase IIb study, no recurrences were observed in the HER2+ population after 5 years of follow-up, if the patient was treated with GLSI-100, survived, and was followed for more than 6 months ( p = 0.0338). Immunotherapy elicited a potent response measured by skin tests and immunological assays. Of the 146 patients that have been treated with GLSI-100 over 4 clinical trials, GLSI-100 was well-tolerated and no serious adverse events observed were considered related to the immunotherapy. Methods: This Phase III trial is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, multi-center study. After 1 year of trastuzumab-based therapy, 6 intradermal injections of GLSI-100 or placebo will be administered over the first 6 months and 5 subsequent boosters will be administered over the next 2.5 years for a total of 11 injections over 3 years. The participant duration of the trial will be 3 years treatment plus 1 additional year follow-up for a total of 4 years following the first year of treatment with trastuzumab-based therapy. Patients will be stratified based on residual disease status at surgery, hormone receptor status and region. Approximately 498 patients will be enrolled. To detect a hazard ratio of 0.3 in invasive breast cancer free survival (IBCFS), 28 events will be required. An interim analysis for superiority and futility will be conducted when at least 14 events have occurred. This sample size provides 80% power if the annual rate of events in placebo patients is 2.4% or greater. Up to 100 non-HLA-A*02 subjects will be enrolled in an open-label arm. The patient population is defined by these key eligibility criteria: HER2/neu positive and HLA-A*02; residual disease or High risk pCR (Stage III at presentation) post neo-adjuvant therapy; exclude stage IV; completed at least 90% of planned trastuzumab-based therapy. Trial objectives were to determine if GP2 therapy increases IBCFS, to assess the safety profile of GP2 and to monitor immunologic responses to treatment and assess relationship to efficacy and safety. The study has been initiated at a number of sites in the US. The study is also expected to be opened in Spain, Germany, and France. Clinical trial information: NCT05232916 .

Association of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) with clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis in young women with HR+/HER2- breast cancer (BC).

505 Background: Increased TILs are associated with better prognosis in triple-negative BC, including in patients (pts) age &lt; 40. However, the role of TILs remains unclear in HR+/HER2- BC and little data exist in young pts, in whom immune microenvironment could be altered by age-related host/tumor differences. We assessed the extent and composition of immune infiltration in HR+ tumors of young women and correlated with clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes. Methods: From a prospective cohort study of women with BC diagnosed age ≤40, we identified those with stage I-III HR+/HER2- BC and available pre-treatment (tx) tumor tissue. Multiplexed immunofluorescence was used to quantify cytotoxic T (CD8+), T helper (Th, CD3+CD8-), T regulatory (Tregs, FOXP3+CD3+) and exhausted T (PD1+CD8+) cells in stroma and tumor. Univariate analyses tested associations between clinicopathologic variables and immune markers by high or low expression, divided based on median. High vs. low TILs were evaluated in Cox regression analyses for invasive breast cancer-free survival (iBCFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: In 390 pts, median age was 37 years (21-40), most had grade 2 (51%), T1 (65%), N0 (63%) tumors and 67% received adjuvant chemotherapy. Black pts (n = 17) had higher expression of stromal CD8+ ( P= .010), FOXP3+CD3+ ( P= .027) and PD1+CD8+ TILs ( P= .043); intratumoral TILs did not differ by race. Older age (36-40) was associated with high expression of CD8+ ( P= .033) and PD1+CD8+ TILs ( P= .031) within stroma and CD3+CD8- TILs within tumor ( P= .046). Grade 3 tumors had higher stromal and intratumoral expression of CD3+CD8- ( P= .002; P&lt; .001) and FOXP3+CD3+ TILs ( P= .020; P&lt; .001). No differences in TILs were seen according to recency of pregnancy, BRCA1/2 status or T/N stage. Over a median follow up of 8 years, 85 iBCFS events, 64 DDFS events and 37 deaths occurred. High stromal expression of CD3+CD8- TILs was associated with better iBCFS (HR 0.49, P= .002) and DDFS (HR 0.57, P= .046), which remained significant when adjusted for T/N stage, grade and chemotherapy (iBCFS HR 0.41, P&lt; .001; DDFS HR 0.45, P= .008). High stromal expression of CD3+CD8- and FOXP3+CD3+ TILs was associated with better OS (HR 0.47, P= .038) and iBCFS (HR 0.58, P= .018), respectively, on adjusted analyses only. High intratumoral expression of CD3+CD8- and FOXP3+CD3+ TILs was associated with better iBCFS (HR 0.59, P= .025; HR 0.63, P= .043) after adjustment only. Conclusions: The distribution of TIL subtypes in young women’s HR+ BC varied according to race, age and grade. High stromal and intratumoral expression of Th and Tregs was associated with improved BC outcomes. Characterization of immune cell subsets could help refine the prognostic value of TILs in HR+ BC, particularly in young pts who may benefit from individualized escalated/de-escalated tx strategies.

Abstract CT064: Phase III study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GLSI-100 (GP2 + GM-CSF) in breast cancer patients with residual disease or high-risk PCR after both neo-adjuvant and postoperative adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy, Flamingo-01

Abstract Background: GP2 is a biologic nine amino acid peptide of the HER2/neu protein delivered in combination with Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) that stimulates an immune response targeting HER2/neu expressing cancers, the combination known as GLSI-100. In a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase IIb study, no recurrences were observed in the HER2+ population after 5 years of follow-up, if the patient was treated with GLSI-100, survived, and was followed for more than 6 months (p = 0.0338). Immunotherapy elicited a potent response measured by skin tests and immunological assays. Of the 146 patients that have been treated with GLSI-100 over 4 clinical trials, GLSI-100 was well-tolerated and no serious adverse events observed were considered related to the immunotherapy. Method: This Phase III trial is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, multi-center study. After 1 year of trastuzumab-based therapy, 6 intradermal injections of GLSI-100 or placebo will be administered over the first 6 months and 5 subsequent boosters will be administered over the next 2.5 years for a total of 11 injections over 3 years. The participant duration of the trial will be 3 years treatment plus 1 additional year follow-up for a total of 4 years following the first year of treatment with trastuzumab-based therapy. Patients will be stratified based on residual disease status at surgery, hormone receptor status and region. Study Size - Interim Analysis: Approximately 498 patients will be enrolled. To detect a hazard ratio of 0.3 in invasive breast cancer free survival (IBCFS), 28 events will be required. An interim analysis for superiority and futility will be conducted when at least 14 events have occurred. This sample size provides 80% power if the annual rate of events in placebo patients is 2.4% or greater. Up to 100 non-HLA-A*02 subjects will be enrolled in an open-label arm. Eligibility Criteria: The patient population is defined by these key eligibility criteria: 1) HER2/neu positive and HLA-A*02; 2) Residual disease or High risk pCR (Stage III at presentation) post neo-adjuvant therapy; 3) Exclude Stage IV; and 4) Completed at least 90% of planned trastuzumab-based therapy. Trial Objectives: 1) To determine if GP2 therapy increases IBCFS; 2) To assess the safety profile of GP2; and 3) To monitor immunologic responses to treatment and assess relationship to efficacy and safety. Study Status: The study has been initiated at a number of sites in the US. The study is also expected to be opened in Spain, Germany, and France. Funding: This trial is supported by Greenwich LifeSciences. Citation Format: Snehal S. Patel, Jaye L. Thompson, Mira S. Patel, F. Joseph Daugherty, Mothaffar F. Rimawi. Phase III study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GLSI-100 (GP2 + GM-CSF) in breast cancer patients with residual disease or high-risk PCR after both neo-adjuvant and postoperative adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy, Flamingo-01 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT064.

Abstract P4-07-14: Long-term Outcomes After 1 or 2-3 Lines of Neoadjuvant Therapy in Stage III Inflammatory Breast Cancer

Abstract Background: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is associated with a poor prognosis. While many stage III IBC patients (pts) experience a sufficient response to first-line (1L) neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to permit subsequent surgical therapy, the prognostic significance of requiring additional NAC to enable resectability is unknown. We sought to describe the pathologic complete response (pCR) rates, breast cancer-free survival (BCFS) and overall survival (OS) among pts requiring 1 vs &amp;gt;1 lines of NAC prior to surgery. Methods: Upon IRB approval, pts with stage III IBC from 2 academic institutions (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and MD Anderson Cancer Center) who received 1L or 2-3 lines (2-3L) of NAC prior to surgery were identified. Standard NAC regimens containing different drugs, such as AC-T or TCHP, were considered as 1L. Pts with locoregional progression or metastatic disease prior to surgery were excluded. Hormone receptor (HR), HER2 status, grade, and pCR, defined as no residual invasive cancer in the breast and the axilla, were evaluated. BCFS, defined as time from surgery to locoregional and/or distant recurrence, and OS, defined as time from surgery to death, were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox models stratified by institution and containing the covariates pCR and tumor subtype were utilized to estimate the HR of 2-3L vs. 1L of therapy. Results: 808 eligible pts diagnosed between 1997 and 2020 were identified. 733 (91%) had 1L and 75 (9%) had 2-3L of NAC, and the median age was 50 years. 295 (37%) had HER2+, 282 (35%) HR+HER2-, 211 (26%) had HR-HER2- disease and for 20 (2%) pts, the receptor status was unknown. The median time from diagnosis to surgery was 6 months. Grade III disease, triple-negative and HER2-positive disease were more prevalent in pts receiving 2-3L of therapy (table). pCR was achieved in 178 (24%) pts receiving 1L of NAC, and in 14 (19%) pts receiving 2-3L of NAC. At 68 months of median follow-up, 417 (52%) pts experienced a recurrence with 376 in the 1L group and 41 in the 2-3L group. The 5-year BCFS was shorter for the 2-3L group compared to the 1L group (33% v 46%, HR=1.37; 95% CI:0.99-1.91). However, in 192 pts with a pCR, BCFS was similar, regardless of the number of NAC lines. There were 38 recurrences among 178 1L pts, and 3 recurrences among 14 2-3L pts, resulting in BCFS of 76% and 83% in 1L and 2-3L pts, respectively. Overall, there were 308 deaths, 276 deaths among 1L pts and 32 among 2-3L pts. The 5-yr OS estimate in 1L versus 2-3L pts was 60% versus 53% (HR=1.32, 95% CI: 0.91-1.93). Conclusion: Among pts with stage III IBC, pCR was observed among 24% who had 1L and 19% of pts who required 2-3L of NAC. BCFS and OS were comparable among pts with pCR after 1L and 2-3L. Our results suggest the need to continue to optimize current treatment strategies in IBC to improve pCR rates across all disease subtypes regardless of the number of lines of NAC required. Citation Format: Faina Nakhlis, Samuel Niman, Naoto T. Ueno, Elizabeth Troll, Sean Ryan, Eren Yeh, Laura Warren, Jennifer Bellon, Beth Harrison, Toshiaki Iwase, H. T. Carisa Le-Petross, Sadia Saleem, Mediget Teshome, Gary J. Whitman, Wendy Woodward, Beth Overmoyer, Sara Tolaney, Meredith Regan, Filipa Lynce, Rachel M. Layman. Long-term Outcomes After 1 or 2-3 Lines of Neoadjuvant Therapy in Stage III Inflammatory Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-14.

Abstract OT3-32-01: OPTIMA, a prospective randomized trial to validate the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of gene expression test-directed chemotherapy decisions in high clinical risk early breast cancer

Abstract Background: Multi-parameter tumor gene expression assays (MPAs) are used to estimate individual patient risk and guide chemotherapy use in hormone-sensitive, HER2-negative early breast cancer. The TAILORx trial supports MPA use in a node-negative population. Evidence for MPA use in postmenopausal node-positive breast cancer has been provided by the RxPONDER trial interim analysis but this relies on the absence of superiority in an analysis where &amp;gt;50% of events were unrelated to breast cancer. There is much uncertainty about MPA use for premenopausal patients. OPTIMA (Optimal Personalised Treatment of early breast cancer usIng Multi-parameter Analysis) (ISRCTN42400492) is a prospective international randomized controlled trial designed to validate MPAs as predictors of chemotherapy sensitivity in a largely node-positive breast cancer population. Methods: OPTIMA is a partially blinded study with an adaptive two-stage design. The trial recruits women and men age 40 or older with resected ER-positive, HER2-negative invasive breast cancer and up to 9 involved axillary lymph nodes. Randomization is to standard management (chemotherapy and endocrine therapy) or to MPA-directed treatment using the Prosigna (PAM50) test. Those with a Prosigna tumor Score (ROR_PT) &amp;gt;60 receive standard management whilst those with a low score (≤60) tumor are treated with endocrine therapy alone. Endocrine therapy for pre-menopausal women includes ovarian suppression for all participants unless they experience a chemotherapy-induced menopause. Adjuvant abemaciclib is permitted. The trial will be analyzed for (1) non-inferiority of recurrence according to randomization and (2) cost-effectiveness. The key secondary outcome is non-inferiority of recurrence for patients with low ROR_PT score tumors. The efficacy analyses will be performed Per Protocol using Invasive Breast Cancer Free Survival (IBCFS) as the primary outcome measure to limit the risk of a false non-inferiority conclusion. Recruitment of 4500 patients over 8 years will permit demonstration of up to 3% non-inferiority of test-directed treatment with at least 83% power, assuming 5-year IBCFS is 87% with standard management. An integrated qualitative recruitment study addresses challenges to consent and recruitment, building on experience from the feasibility study which found that a multidisciplinary approach is important for recruitment success. OPTIMA is strongly supported by a patient group which has helped design all patient documents and which is represented on the TMG. Results: The OPTIMA main trial opened in January 2017 and has continued to recruit throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall recruitment as of 1 July 2022 was 2814 (2593 from UK, 221 from Norway). Patient characteristics are well balanced between the trial arms. Currently 95% of randomized participants are eligible for inclusion in the PP analysis. 66% of the MPA-directed arm participants have been allocated to endocrine therapy only. The test failure rate is &amp;lt; 1%. Conclusion: OPTIMA will provide robust unbiased evidence on test-directed chemotherapy safety for both postmenopausal and premenopausal women with 1-3 involved nodes as well as for patients with 4-9 involved nodes and for patients treated with abemaciclib. Funding: OPTIMA is funded by the UK NIHR HTA Programme (10/34/501) and in Norway by KLINBEFORSK and the Norwegian Cancer Society. Views expressed are those of the authors and not those of the HTA Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health. Trial Inquiries: OPTIMA@warwick.ac.uk Patient characteristics Citation Format: Robert Stein, Andreas Makris, Iain Macpherson, Luke Hughes-Davies, Andrea Marshall, Georgina Dotchin, David A. Cameron, Belinda E. Kiely, Caroline Wilson, Anne Armstrong, Helena M. Earl, Christopher J. Poole, Janice Tsang, Bjørn Naume, Daniel Rea, Hege Ohnstad, Peter S. Hall, Stuart A. McIntosh, Bethany Shinkins, Christopher McCabe, Adrienne Morgan, John MS Bartlett, Janet A. Dunn. OPTIMA, a prospective randomized trial to validate the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of gene expression test-directed chemotherapy decisions in high clinical risk early breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-32-01.

Abstract OT2-10-06: Phase III study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GLSI-100 (GP2 + GM-CSF) in breast cancer patients with residual disease or high-risk PCR after both neo-adjuvant and postoperative adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy, Flamingo-01

Abstract Background: GP2 is a biologic nine amino acid peptide of the HER2/neu protein delivered in combination with Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) that stimulates an immune response targeting HER2/neu expressing cancers, the combination known as GLSI-100. In a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase IIb study, no recurrences were observed in the HER2+ population after 5 years of follow-up, if the patient was treated with GLSI-100, survived and was followed for more than 6 months (p = 0.0338). Immunotherapy elicited a potent response measured by skin tests and immunological assays. Of the 146 patients that have been treated with GLSI-100 over 4 clinical trials, GLSI-100 was well-tolerated and no serious adverse events were observed considered related to the immunotherapy. Method: This Phase III trial is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, multi-center study. After 1 year of trastuzumab-based therapy, 6 intradermal injections of GLSI-100 or placebo will be administered over the first 6 months and 5 subsequent boosters will be administered over the next 2.5 years for a total of 11 injections over 3 years. The participant duration of the trial will be 3 years treatment plus 1 additional year follow-up for a total of 4 years following the first year of treatment with trastuzumab-based therapy. Patients will be stratified based on residual disease status at surgery, hormone receptor status and region. Study Size – Interim Analysis: Approximately 498 patients will be enrolled. To detect a hazard ratio of 0.3 in invasive breast cancer free survival (IBCFS), 28 events will be required. An interim analysis for superiority and futility will be conducted when at least 14 events have occurred. This sample size provides 80% power if the annual rate of events in placebo patients is 2.4% or greater. Up to 100 non-HLA-A*02 subjects will be enrolled in an open-label arm. Eligibility Criteria: The patient population is defined by these key eligibility criteria: 1. HER2/neu positive and HLA-A*02 2. Residual disease or High risk pCR (Stage III at presentation) post neo-adjuvant therapy 3. Exclude Stage IV 4. Completed at least 90% of planned trastuzumab-based therapy Trial Objectives: 1. To determine if GP2 therapy increases IBCFS 2. To assess the safety profile of GP2 3. To monitor immunologic responses to treatment and assess relationship to efficacy and safety Contact information: Snehal Patel Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. Stafford, TX Email: snehal.patel@greenwichlifesciences.com Website: greenwichlifesciences.com Funding: This trial is supported by Greenwich LifeSciences. Citation Format: Snehal Patel, Jaye Thompson, Mira Patel, F. Joseph Daugherty, C. Kent Osborne, Mothaffar Rimawi. Phase III study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GLSI-100 (GP2 + GM-CSF) in breast cancer patients with residual disease or high-risk PCR after both neo-adjuvant and postoperative adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy, Flamingo-01 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-10-06.