Breast Brachytherapy Research Articles

BP02 Presentation Time: 4:09 PM: Systematic Patient-Specific Pre-Treatment Verification in Interstitial Breast Brachytherapy: Frequency and Magnitude of Treatment Error

BP02 Presentation Time: 4:09 PM: Systematic Patient-Specific Pre-Treatment Verification in Interstitial Breast Brachytherapy: Frequency and Magnitude of Treatment Error

BP05 Presentation Time: 4:36 PM: Dosimetric Impact of Inter-Fractional Applicator Lengthening in High-Dose Rate Interstitial Breast Brachytherapy

BP05 Presentation Time: 4:36 PM: Dosimetric Impact of Inter-Fractional Applicator Lengthening in High-Dose Rate Interstitial Breast Brachytherapy

Long-term results of intraoperative multicatheter breast implant (IOMBI) for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) on early breast cancer patients

Background and purposeMulticatheter breast brachytherapy is a standard technique for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) in early breast cancer patients. Intraoperative multicatheter breast implant (IOMBI) followed by perioperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy (PHDRBT) offers a novel and advantageous approach. We present long-term oncological, toxicity, and cosmesis outcomes for a well-experienced single institution. Materials and methodsEligible women aged ≥ 40 years with clinically and radiologically confirmed unifocal invasive or in situ ≤ 3 cm breast tumors underwent IOMBI during breast-conserving surgery. Patients meeting APBI criteria by definitive pathologic results received 3.4 Gy × 10fx with PHDRBT. Patients not suitable for APBI received PHDRBT-boost followed by WBRT. ResultsA total of 171 patients underwent IOMBI during BCS, 120 patients (70.1 %) were suitable for APBI and 51 (29.8 %) for anticipated PHDRBT-boost. The median age was 61 years (range: 40–78), the median tumor size was 1.1 cm (range: 0.2–3.5), with a histological diagnosis of invasive ductal carcinoma in 78.9 % and ductal in situ in 21.1 %. A median of 9 catheters (range: 4–14) were used. For APBI, the median CTV and V100 were 40.8 cc (range: 8.6–99) and 35.4 cc (range: 7.2–94). The median of healthy breast tissue irradiated represents 7.2 % (range: 2.3–28 %) and the median local treatment duration was 10 days (range: 7–16). With a median follow-up of 8.8 years (range: 0.3–16.25), the 8-year local, locoregional, and distant control rates were 99 %, 98.1 %, and 100 %. G1-G2 late-toxicity rate was 53.4 %. Long-term cosmetic evaluation was excellent-good in 90.8 %. ConclusionIOMBI&PHDRBT program reports excellent long-term oncological outcomes, with a reduction from unnecessary irradiation exposure which translates into low long-term toxicity and good cosmesis outcomes, especially on well-selected APBI patients.

Cost-benefit ratio of modern medical education using micro-costing: amodel calculation using the example of an innovative breast brachytherapy workshop.

Radiation oncology is an essential component of therapeutic oncology and necessitates well-trained personnel. Multicatheter brachytherapy (MCBT) is one radiotherapeutic option for early-stage breast cancer treatment. However, specialized hands-on training for MCBT is not currently included in the curriculum for residents. Arecently developed hands-on brachytherapy workshop has demonstrated promising results in enhancing knowledge and practical skills. Nevertheless, these simulation-based teaching formats necessitate more time and financial resources. Our analyses include computational models for the implementation and delivery of this workshop and can serve as abasis for similar educational initiatives. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of apreviously developed and evaluated breast brachytherapy simulation workshop. Using amicro-costing approach, we estimated costs at adetailed level by considering supplies, soft- and hardware, and personnel time for each task. This method also allows for acomprehensive evaluation of the costs associated with implementing new medical techniques. The workshop costs were divided into two categories: development and workshop execution. The cost analysis was conducted on aper-participant basis, and the impact on knowledge improvement was measured using aquestionnaire. The total workshop costs were determined by considering the initial workshop setup expenses including the development and conceptualization of the course with all involved collaborators, as well as the costs incurred for each individual course. The workshop was found to be financially efficient, with aper-participant cost of € 39, considering the industrial sponsorship provided for brachytherapy equipment. In addition, we assessed the workshop's efficacy by analyzing participant feedback using Likert scale evaluations. The findings indicated anotable enhancement in both theoretical and practical skills among the participants. Moreover, the cost-to-benefit ratio (CBFR) analysis demonstrated aCBFR of € 13.53 for each Likert point increment. The hands-on brachytherapy workshop proved to be avaluable and approximately cost-effective educational program, leading to asignificant enhancement in the knowledge and skills of the participants. Without the support of industrial sponsorship, the costs would have been unattainable.

RapidBrachyTG43: A Geant4-based TG-43 parameter and dose calculation module for brachytherapy dosimetry.

The AAPM TG-43U1 formalism remains the clinical standard for dosimetry of low- and high-energy -emitting brachytherapy sources. TG-43U1 and related reports provide consensus datasets of TG-43 parameters derived from various published measured data and Monte Carlo simulations. These data are used to perform standardized and fast dose calculations for brachytherapy treatmentplanning. Monte Carlo TG-43 dosimetry parameters are commonly derived to characterize novel brachytherapy sources. RapidBrachyTG43 is a module of RapidBrachyMCTPS, a Monte Carlo-based treatment planning system, designed to automate this process, requiring minimal user input to prepare Geant4-based Monte Carlo simulations for a source. RapidBrachyTG43 may also perform a TG-43 dose to water-in-water calculation for a plan, substantially accelerating the same calculation performed using RapidBrachyMCTPS's Monte Carlo dose calculationengine. TG-43 parameters , , , and were calculated using three commercial source models, one each of I, Ir, and Co, and were benchmarked to published data. TG-43 dose to water was calculated for a clinical breast brachytherapy plan and was compared to a Monte Carlo dose calculation with all patient tissues, air, and catheters set towater. TG-43 parameters for the three simulated sources agreed with benchmark datasets within tolerances specified by the High Energy Brachytherapy Dosimetry working group. A gamma index comparison between the TG-43 and Monte Carlo dose-to-water calculations with a dose difference and difference to agreement criterion of 1%/1 mm yielded a 98.9% pass rate, with all relevant dose volume histogram metrics for the plan agreeing within 1%. Performing a TG-43-based dose calculation provided an acceleration of dose-to-water calculation by a factor of165. Determination of TG-43 parameter data for novel brachytherapy sources may now be facilitated by RapidBrachyMCTPS. These parameter datasets and existing consensus or published datasets may also be used to determine the TG-43 dose for a plan inRapidBrachyMCTPS.

Post- versus intra-operative implant for breast cancer interstitial brachytherapy: How to choose?

Breast brachytherapy (BB) represents an important radiation therapy modality in modern breast cancer treatments. Currently, BB is mainly used for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), local boost after whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT), and as salvage re-irradiation after second lumpectomy (APBrl). Two multi-catheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIB) techniques can be offered: intra-operative (IOB) and post-operative (POB) brachytherapy. The aim of this article was to summarize current available data on these two different brachytherapy approaches for breast cancer. A literature search was performed, and different experiences published by BB expert teams were analyzed and compared. These two different brachytherapy approaches for breast cancer have also been presented and discussed during meetings of the GEC-ESTRO BCWG. In addition, expert recommendations were defined. A comprehensive description and practical comparison of both the techniques, i.e., IOB and POB, considering the latest available published data were presented. Different technical, logistic, and clinical aspects of both the methods were thoroughly examined and analyzed. This detailed comparison of the two breast brachytherapy techniques was supported by scientific data from extensive experience of experts, facilitating an objective analysis that, to our knowledge, has not been previously published. Based on the comprehensive analysis of both the brachytherapy techniques available, this article serves as a valuable resource to guide breast teams in selecting the optimal BB technique (POB or IOB), considering hospital environment, multi-disciplinary collaboration, and patient logistics.

Phase II Trial of Five-Fraction Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Using Noninvasive Image-Guided Breast Brachytherapy

NIBB has potential advantages over other APBI techniques by delivering highly conformal radiation with minimal collateral dose to the heart and lung compared with external beam techniques, but unlike other brachytherapy techniques NIBB is non-invasive. Previous data has shown encouraging outcomes using a 10-fraction regimen. To improve efficiency, convenience, and cost, reduction in the fraction number is desirable. Final results of a prospective phase II trial are reported. NIBB APBI was delivered using 28.5Gy in 5 fractions daily over 1 week. Patient eligibility criteria required: invasive carcinoma ≤2.0 cm or DCIS ≤3.0 cm, ER positive (if invasive), lymph node negative, LVI absent, and lumpectomy with margins negative by 2mm. The primary endpoint was grade ≥ 2 subcutaneous fibrosis/induration <30%. Secondary endpoints included any late toxicity, cosmetic outcome, and local control. 40 patients were treated with a median follow-up of 59.7 months. The mean age was 67 years (50-89 years) and tumor size was 1.0cm (0.3-2.0cm). 80% had invasive carcinoma. The mean breast separation with compression was 6.7cm (3.5-8.9cm). The 5-year actuarial local control was 96.6% and overall survival was 96.9%. Grade 2 and 3 late toxicities were 15% and 0%, respectively. The rate of grade 2 subcutaneous fibrosis/induration was 2.5% (+/-2.5%) meeting the study's primary endpoint. The most common late toxicity of any grade was skin telangiectasia; 22.5% grade 1 and 15% grade 2. Only breast separation was associated with telangiectasia risk, p=0.002. Overall cosmetic outcome was excellent, good, and fair/poor in 75%, 25%, and 0%, respectively. NIBB APBI delivered in 5 fractions results in a low rate of late toxicity and a high rate of good/excellent cosmetic outcomes. Telangiectasia risk can be minimized by keeping breast separation ≤7.0cm. The local failure rate was appropriately low. Further investigation of this technique is warranted.

PP05 Presentation Time: 4:06 PM: Introducing a Robotic 3D Ultrasound System for Improved Seroma Visualization and Implant Guidance in Partial Breast Brachytherapy

PP05 Presentation Time: 4:06 PM: Introducing a Robotic 3D Ultrasound System for Improved Seroma Visualization and Implant Guidance in Partial Breast Brachytherapy

PP06 Presentation Time: 5:15 PM: BrUOG 291: Phase II Trial of Five-Fraction Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI) Using Non-Invasive Image-Guided Breast Brachytherapy (NIBB) (NCT01961531)

PP06 Presentation Time: 5:15 PM: BrUOG 291: Phase II Trial of Five-Fraction Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI) Using Non-Invasive Image-Guided Breast Brachytherapy (NIBB) (NCT01961531)

PO115: Air Gaps in Perioperative Interstitial Breast Brachytherapy: Report of Two Cases

PO115: Air Gaps in Perioperative Interstitial Breast Brachytherapy: Report of Two Cases

2 Improving Visualization and Guidance for Breast Brachytherapy: Developing, Commissioning, and Implementing a High-Resolution Robotic 3D Ultrasound System

2 Improving Visualization and Guidance for Breast Brachytherapy: Developing, Commissioning, and Implementing a High-Resolution Robotic 3D Ultrasound System

PO121: Accelerated Partial Breast Brachytherapy in the Setting of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma

PO121: Accelerated Partial Breast Brachytherapy in the Setting of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma

MSOR09 Presentation Time: 9:10 AM: Improving Treatment Quality in Multi-Catheter Breast Brachytherapy by Decision-Tree Based Treatment Adaption and Implementation of Patient Immobilization

MSOR09 Presentation Time: 9:10 AM: Improving Treatment Quality in Multi-Catheter Breast Brachytherapy by Decision-Tree Based Treatment Adaption and Implementation of Patient Immobilization

Investigating the impact of breast positioning control on physical treatment parameters in multi-catheter breast brachytherapy

PurposeTo assess the effects of a workflow for reproducible patient and breast positioning on implant stability during high-dose-rate multi-catheter breast brachytherapy.MethodsThirty patients were treated with our new positioning control workflow. Implant stability was evaluated based on a comparison of planning-CTs to control-CTs acquired halfway through the treatment. To assess geometric stability, button–button distance variations as well as Euclidean dwell position deviations were evaluated. The latter were also quantified within various separated regions within the breast to investigate the location-dependency of implant alterations. Furthermore, dosimetric variations to target volume and organs at risk (ribs, skin) as well as isodose volume changes were analyzed. Results were compared to a previously treated cohort of 100 patients.ResultsWith the introduced workflow, the patient fraction affected by button–button distance variations > 5 mm and by dwell position deviations > 7 mm were reduced from 37% to 10% and from 30% to 6.6%, respectively. Implant stability improved the most in the lateral to medial breast regions. Only small stability enhancements were observed regarding target volume dosimetry, but the stability of organ at risk exposure became substantially higher. D0.2ccm skin dose variations > 12.4% and D0.1ccm rib dose variations > 6.7% were reduced from 11% to 0% and from 16% to 3.3% of all patients, respectively.ConclusionBreast positioning control improved geometric and dosimetric implant stability for individual patients, and thus enhanced physical plan validity in these cases.

Estimating follow-up CTs from geometric deformations of catheter implants in interstitial breast brachytherapy: A feasibility study using electromagnetic tracking.

Electromagnetic tracking (EMT) systems have been shown to provide valuable information on the geometry of catheter implants in breast cancer patients undergoing interstitial brachytherapy (iBT). In the context of an extended patient-specific, pre-treatment verification, EMT can play a key role in determining the potential need and, if applicable, the appropriate time for treatment adaptation. To detect dosimetric shortcomings the relative position between catheters, and target volume and critical structures must be known. Since EMT cannot provide the anatomical context and standard imaging techniques such as cone-beam CT are not yet available in most brachytherapy suites, it is not possible to detect anatomic changes on a daily or fraction basis, so the need for adaptive planning cannot be identified. The aim of this feasibility study is to develop and evaluate a technique capable of estimating follow-up CTs at any time based on the initial treatment planning CT (PCT) and surrogate information about changes of the implant geometry from an EMT system. A deformation vector field is calculated from two different implant reconstructions acquired in treatment position through EMT, the first immediately after the PCT and the second at another time point during the course of treatment. The calculation is based on discrete displacement vectors of pairs of control and target points. These are extrapolated by means of different radial basis functions in order to cover the entire CT volume. The adequate parameters for the calculation of the deformation field were identified. By warping the PCT according to the deformation field, one obtains an estimated CT (ECT) that reflects the geometric changes. For the proof of concept, ECTs were computed for the time point of the clinical follow-up CT (FCT) that is embedded in the treatment workflow after the fourth fraction. ECT and clinical FCTs of 20 patients were compared to each other quantitatively in terms of absolute Hounsfield unit differences in the planning target volume (PTV) and in a convex hull (CH) enclosing the catheters. The median differences were 31.2 and 29.5HU for the CH and the PTV, respectively. The proposed ECT approach was able to approximate the "anatomy of the day" and therefore, in principle, allows a dosimetric appraisal of the treatment plan quality before each fraction. In this way, it can contribute to a more detailed patient-specific quality assurance in iBT of the breast and help to identify the timing for a potential treatment adaptation.

Localization of reference points in electromagnetic tracking data and their application for treatment error detection in interstitial breast brachytherapy.

Electromagnetic tracking (EMT) is a promising technology that holds great potential to advance patient-specific pre-treatment verification in interstitial brachytherapy (iBT). It allows easy determination of the implant geometry without line-of-sight restrictions and without dose exposure to the patient. What it cannot provide, however, is a link to anatomical landmarks, such as the exit points of catheters or needles on the skin surface. These landmarks are required for the registration of EMT data with other imaging modalities and for the detection of treatment errors such as incorrect indexer lengths, and catheter or needle shifts. To develop an easily applicable method to detect reference points in the positional data of the trajectory of an EMT sensor, specifically the exit points of catheters in breast iBT, and to apply the approach to pre-treatment error detection. Small metal objects were attached to catheter fixation buttons that rest against the breast surface to intentionally induce a local, spatially limited perturbation of the magnetic field on which the working principle of EMT relies. This perturbation can be sensed by the EMT sensor as it passes by, allowing it to localize the metal object and thus the catheter exit point. For the proof-of-concept, different small metal objects (magnets, washers, and bushes) and EMT sensor drive speeds were used to find the optimal parameters. The approach was then applied to treatment error detection and validated in-vitro on a phantom. Lastly, the in-vivo feasibility of the approach was tested on a patient cohort of four patients to assess the impact on the clinical workflow. All investigated metal objects were able to measurably perturb the magnetic field, which resulted in missing sensor readings, that is two data gaps, one for the sensor moving towards the tip end and one when retracting from there. The size of the resulting data gaps varied depending on the choice of gap points used for calculation of the gap size; it was found that the start points of the gaps in both directions showed the smallest variability. The median size of data gaps was ⩽8mm for all tested materials and sensor drive speeds. The variability of the determined object position was ⩽0.5mm at a speed of 1.0cm/s and ⩽0.7mm at 2.5cm/s, with an increase up to 2.3mm at 5.0cm/s. The in-vitro validation of the error detection yielded a 100% detection rate for catheter shifts of ≥2.2mm. All simulated wrong indexer lengths were correctly identified. The in-vivo feasibility assessment showed that the metal objects did not interfere with the routine clinical workflow. The developed approach was able to successfully detect reference points in EMT data, which can be used for registration to other imaging modalities, but also for treatment error detection. It can thus advance the automation of patient-specific, pre-treatment quality assurance in iBT.

A MC-based anthropomorphic test case for commissioning model-based dose calculation in interstitial breast 192-Ir HDR brachytherapy.

To provide the first clinical test case for commissioning of 192 Ir brachytherapy model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs) according to the AAPM TG-186 report workflow. A computational patient phantom model was generated from a clinical multi-catheter 192 Ir HDR breast brachytherapy case. Regions of interest (ROIs) were contoured and digitized on the patient CT images and the model was written to a series of DICOM CT images using MATLAB. The model was imported into two commercial treatment planning systems (TPSs) currently incorporating an MBDCA. Identical treatment plans were prepared using a generic 192 Ir HDR source and the TG-43-based algorithm of each TPS. This was followed by dose to medium in medium calculations using the MBDCA option of each TPS. Monte Carlo (MC) simulation was performed in the model using three different codes and information parsed from the treatment plan exported in DICOM radiation therapy (RT) format. Results were found to agree within statistical uncertainty and the dataset with the lowest uncertainty was assigned as the reference MC dose distribution. The dataset is available online at http://irochouston.mdanderson.org/rpc/BrachySeeds/BrachySeeds/index.html,https://doi.org/10.52519/00005. Files include the treatment plan for each TPS in DICOM RT format, reference MC dose data in RT Dose format, as well as a guide for database users and all files necessary to repeat the MC simulations. The dataset facilitates the commissioning of brachytherapy MBDCAs using TPS embedded tools and establishes a methodology for the development of future clinical test cases. It is also useful to non-MBDCA adopters for intercomparing MBDCAs and exploring their benefits and limitations, as well as to brachytherapy researchers in need of a dosimetric and/or a DICOM RT information parsing benchmark. Limitations include specificity in terms of radionuclide, source model, clinical scenario, and MBDCA version used for its preparation.

Three-Fraction Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI) Delivered With Interstitial Brachytherapy Is Safe: First Results From the Tri-fraction Radiation Therapy Used to Minimize Patient Hospital Trips (TRIUMPH-T) Trial

Shorter courses of breast radiotherapy are offered as an alternative to 4 weeks of whole-breast irradiation after lumpectomy, including brachytherapy. A prospective phase 2multi-institution clinical trial to study 3-fraction accelerated partial breast irradiation delivered by brachytherapy was conducted. The trial treated selected breast cancers after breast-conserving surgery with brachytherapy applicators that delivered 22.5 Gy in 3 fractions of 7.5 Gy. The planning treatment volume was 1 to 2 cm beyond the surgical cavity. Eligible women were age ≥45 years with unicentric invasive or in situ tumors ≤3 cm excised with negative margins and with positive estrogen or progesterone receptors and no metastases to axillary nodes. Strict dosimetric parameters were required to be met and follow up information was collected from the participating sites. Two hundred patients were prospectively enrolled; however, a total of 185 patients who were enrolled were followed for a median of 3.63 years. Three-fraction brachytherapy was associated with low chronic toxicity. There was excellent or good cosmesis in 94% of patients. There were no grade 4 toxicities. Grade 3 fibrosis at the treatment site was present in 1.7% and 32% percent had grades 1 or 2 fibrosis at the treatment site. There was 1 rib fracture. Other late toxicities included 7.4% grade 1 hyperpigmentation, 2% grade 1 telangiectasias, 1.7% symptomatic seromas, 1.7% abscessed cavities, and 1.1% symptomatic fat necrosis. There were 2 (1.1%) ipsilateral local recurrences, 2 (1.1%) nodal recurrences and no distant recurrences. Other incidents included one contralateral breast cancer and 2 second malignancies (lung). Ultra-short breast brachytherapy is feasible and has excellent toxicity and could be an alternative to standard 5-day, 10 fraction accelerated partial breast irradiation in eligible patients. Patients from this prospective trial will continue to be followed to evaluate long-term outcomes.

On the implant stability in adaptive multi-catheter breast brachytherapy: Establishment of a decision-tree for treatment re-planning

Background and purposeTo assess implant stability and identify causes of implant variations during high-dose-rate multi-catheter breast brachytherapy. Materials and methodsPlanning-CTs were compared to control-CTs acquired halfway through the treatment for 100 patients. For assessing geometric stability, Fréchet-distance and button-to-button distance changes of all catheters as well as variations of Euclidean distances and convex hulls of all dwell positions were determined. The CTs were inspected to identify the causes of geometric changes. Dosimetric effects were evaluated by target volume transfers and re-contouring of organs at risk. The dose non-uniformity ratio (DNR), 100% and 150% isodose volumes (V100 and V150), coverage index (CI), and organ doses were calculated. Correlations between the examined geometric and dosimetric parameters were assessed. ResultsFréchet-distance and dwell position deviations >2.5 mm as well as button-to-button distance changes >5 mm were detected for 5%, 2%, and 6.3% of catheters, but for 32, 17, and 37 patients, respectively. Variations occurred enhanced in the lateral breast and close to the ribs, e.g. due to different arm positions. Only small dosimetric effects with median DNR, V100, and CI variations of −0.01 ± 0.02, (−0.5 ± 1.3)ccm, and (–1.4 ± 1.8)% were observed in general. Skin dose exceeded recommended levels for 12 of 100 patients. Various correlations between geometric and dosimetric implant stability were found, based on which decision-tree regarding treatment re-planning was established. ConclusionMulti-catheter breast brachytherapy shows a high implant stability in general, but considering skin dose changes is important. To increase implant stability for individual patients, we plan to investigate patient immobilization aids during treatments.

Abstract P1-10-11: Optical stimulated luminescence dosimeters for skin dose measurements during accelerated partial breast brachytherapy: In vivo dosimetric validation and clinical outcomes

Abstract BACKGROUND: The role of multi-lumen catheter devices in the delivery of high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy for adjuvant accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) for women with DCIS or early-stage breast cancer has been well established. In vivo dosimetry (IVD) using optically stimulating luminescence dosimeters (OSLD) is a feasible way to detect applicator instability that may cause translational and rotational inaccuracies during HDR brachytherapy delivery. Herein, we evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of IVD to improve patient outcomes following APBI brachytherapy using the Strut Adjusted Volume Irradiation (SAVI) device. METHODS: Single-institution cohort study piloting the use of OSLD on the patient’s skin during HDR brachytherapy APBI to assess the estimated maximum skin dose (skin Dmax) and the achievable accuracy of OSLD for skin Dmax measurements. Women treated with SAVI-based APBI between November 1, 2018 and October 1, 2021 were eligible to enroll in our study. All patients met the American Society for Radiation Oncology “suitable” or “cautionary” criteria and were treated according to the American Brachytherapy Society consensus treatment planning guidelines. A SAVI preplan was created to estimate the probable point of skin Dmax. During CT simulation, a radiopaque marker was placed on the skin for visualization during treatment planning. Correction factors were applied to account for the OSLD tissue-air interface that is not present in the TG-43 expected dose calculations. Measured and calculated IVD doses were analyzed to assess agreement and cause for discrepancies found. Breast phantom IVD measurements repeated seven times with two independent dose points were analyzed to assess the best accuracy achievable under ideal conditions. RESULTS: We enrolled 41 patients with an average age of 68 years. Table 1 details the brachytherapy treatment delivery and dosimetry data. Higher skin Dmax as a percentage of the radiation prescription was associated with the occurrence of breast volume loss noted on subsequent clinical breast exams (OR 1.84 per each 5% increase in skin Dmax; 95% CI 1.21 – 3.32; p=0.016). The graphically estimated skin Dmax threshold was 80% with all cases of noted breast volume loss occurring above this threshold. The overall level of achievable IVD accuracy was ±3.32% based on breast phantom measurements. Under ideal conditions, all measurements were in the ±7% range. Three of 14 phantom measurement exceeded the 6% discrepancy range. Clinical IVD measurements detected 5 true positive cases (12.2% of cohort) that required intervention due to rotations in the SAVI applicator. For a ±7% tolerance criteria, 90.2% of the patients tested passed IVD. Of the eight patients that failed at the 7% level, IVD detected 3 OSLD placement errors, 2 rotational discrepancy cases, and 1 large air-gap at the point of measurement. CONCLUSIONS: Accuracy and reproducibility are imperative tenets of HDR brachytherapy APBI. IVD utilizing OSLD is an effective method for detecting treatment set-up and delivery errors for patients receiving SAVI-based APBI with dose accuracy within ±3.32%. Errors requiring intervention due to SAVI device rotation were detected in 12.2% of our cohort, and these errors would have likely gone undetected without IVD. Using OSLD as IVD to measure skin Dmax doses that may increase the risk of breast cosmetic defects should be investigated further. Table 1. Brachytherapy treatment delivery and dosimetry data. *PTV-Eval is a uniform 10 mm expansion on the CTV with exclusion of PTV within 5 mm of skin or chest wall. +Percent dose discrepancy refers to difference in dose between APBI plan calculations and IVD measurements. Citation Format: Tyler Gutschenritter, Afua Yorke, Nayak Polissar, Nirnaya Miljacic, Janice Kim, Lori Young. Optical stimulated luminescence dosimeters for skin dose measurements during accelerated partial breast brachytherapy: In vivo dosimetric validation and clinical outcomes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-10-11.