Abstract AIMS Seizures are often the presenting symptom in 30-40% of glioma patients, and play a significant role in patients’ quality of life and symptom burden. Many complex factors are considered when selecting anti-seizure medications (ASM) for the individual patient. This single institution study investigates physician practices, seizure control and adverse effect profiles of ASM regimens in glioma patients. METHOD A retrospective review was undertaken of the electronic health records of glioma patients from 2020-2022 who were followed at the University of Vermont Medical Center. RESULTS Ninety-four patients (90 glioblastoma IDH-WT, 1 astrocytoma, 2 oligodendroglioma, 1 radiological diagnosis of glioma) were included. Levetiracetam was the first line ASM in 93 patients including seizure prophylaxis patients per neurosurgical practice. 30 of the patients presented with seizures and required long term ASMs. 21 required a second-line ASM, 3 required a third-line ASM, and 20 experienced at least one adverse drug effect. 11.4% of patients experienced mood disturbances on levetiracetam, ranging from anxiety to mania. 5% of patients experienced generalized weakness and gait imbalance issues on levetiracetam. 25% of patients experienced breakthrough seizures over the course of their illness despite therapeutic levetiracetam > 1000mg/day. 10.4% of patients presented with breakthrough status epilepticus following the initiation of levetiracetam therapy. No statistically significant differences were seen in rates of breakthrough seizures based on extent of resection, functional status or sex. CONCLUSIONS Seizures are a major cause of morbidity in glioma patients. The overwhelming majority of patients included in this study were placed on levetiracetam as a first-line ASM. Most patients on long-term levetiracetam experienced at least one neuropsychiatric adverse effect. Further studies are required to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of ASM regimens in glioma patients and to understand methods for ASM regimen individualization for varying disease courses.
Read full abstract