Reviewed by: Thomas Carlyle and the Idea of Influence ed. by Paul E. Kerry, Albert D. Pionke, and Megan Dent Brent E. Kinser (bio) Thomas Carlyle and the Idea of Influence, edited by Paul E. Kerry, Albert D. Pionke, and Megan Dent; pp. xv + 394. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2018, $120.00, $114.00 ebook. Influence is a tricky thing. Ample evidence for this truism can be found in Thomas Carlyle and the Idea of Influence. In an interesting and useful compilation from a variety of new and familiar voices, editors Paul E. Kerry, Albert D. Pionke, and Megan Dent have assembled eighteen essays derived from lectures given at the Oxford Research Center for the Humanities in July 2016. Organized in three sections on a wide range of topics and individuals, all of the essays, in various ways and degrees of success, reveal Thomas Carlyle's ubiquitous presence in nineteenth-century discourse. Given the breadth of subjects in the collection, readers will have no problem finding something of interest and of use, as well as new insights on both familiar and fresh topics. Where one expects to find Ralph Waldo Emerson (Stephanie Hicks), the laboring classes (Chris R. Vanden Bossche), and the subversion of modernity (Ralph Jessop), it is refreshing also to see the painter John Roddam Spencer Stanhope (Madeleine Emerald Thiele), dress studies (John M. Ulrich), and palimpsest (Pionke). In his trenchant analysis of Carlyle and Emerson's use of William Shakespeare, Tim Sommer makes a particularly salient point: "an exclusive focus on relations of influence, if thought of as linear and textually verifiable, threatens to obscure as much as it explains" (131). Certainly, this collection is at its best when the contributors avoid falling into the trap of viewing influence as a matter of causation. Further, if the collection makes an inarguable case for the presence of influence from various perspectives, it also reveals the problem of influence itself. There are, as there always must be, omissions—Walt Whitman, scientists such as John Tyndall and Thomas Huxley, Young Ireland, and detractors such as the translator, leader-writer, and influential acerb Abraham Hayward, for whom Carlyle's influence was a matter of revulsion. But one missing topic has taken on a new urgency since these lectures were given in 2016, the essay versions' publication in 2018, and this review's writing in 2021. Whether one considers Carlyle's influence in terms of a network, a tradition, a palimpsest, or a subversion of modernity, and when we debate how far that presence [End Page 301] extends, there remains an overarching question: does Carlyle's influence excuse his sometimes horrifyingly immoderate views? On this point, Michael Bentley offers a rather prescient and timely comment when he reminds readers of history's mutability: "No one has felt it necessary to destroy Carlyle's memorabilia, though he may yet go the way of Cecil Rhodes as an emblem of racism. He certainly deserves better than that" (273). But does he? There are a lot of historical figures going the way of Cecil Rhodes these days. And with the recent defacing of a Carlyle statue in Glasgow, it is clear that some people are now feeling a need to destroy "Carlyle's memorabilia." Further, with the National Trust's recent closure of his house in Chelsea, with no plans (at the time of this writing) to reopen, Carlyle's material presence in the world has been diminished—not that he would mind any statue coming down (see "Hudson's Statue" [1850]). To borrow Pionke's formulation of influence as palimpsest, the overriding question of the edition is why. Even if Carlyle's influence is ubiquitous, as this collection contends and convinces, why does it matter? The edition perhaps is more effective in raising this question than in answering it. And the problem is influence itself. On December 6, 1964, at St. Paul's cathedral, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. delivered to more than 3,000 listeners a rather quotidian evensong sermon entitled "The Three Dimensions of a Complete Life." He was in London on his way to Oslo, where in a few days he would accept the Nobel Peace Prize. On December 7, at the...