BRCA Genetic Testing Research Articles

Population-based BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing is cost-effective in Canada

Population-based BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing is cost-effective in Canada

An interpretable deep learning model for detecting BRCA pathogenic variants of breast cancer from hematoxylin and eosin-stained pathological images

Background Determining the status of breast cancer susceptibility genes (BRCA) is crucial for guiding breast cancer treatment. Nevertheless, the need for BRCA genetic testing among breast cancer patients remains unmet due to high costs and limited resources. This study aimed to develop a Bi-directional Self-Attention Multiple Instance Learning (BiAMIL) algorithm to detect BRCA status from hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) pathological images. Methods A total of 319 histopathological slides from 254 breast cancer patients were included, comprising two dependent cohorts. Following image pre-processing, 633,484 tumor tiles from the training dataset were employed to train the self-developed deep-learning model. The performance of the network was evaluated in the internal and external test sets. Results BiAMIL achieved AUC values of 0.819 (95% CI [0.673–0.965]) in the internal test set, and 0.817 (95% CI [0.712–0.923]) in the external test set. To explore the relationship between BRCA status and interpretable morphological features in pathological images, we utilized Class Activation Mapping (CAM) technique and cluster analysis to investigate the connections between BRCA gene mutation status and tissue and cell features. Significantly, we observed that tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and the morphological characteristics of tumor cells appeared to be potential features associated with BRCA status. Conclusions An interpretable deep neural network model based on the attention mechanism was developed to predict the BRCA status in breast cancer. Keywords: Breast cancer, BRCA, deep learning, self-attention, interpretability.

PALB2 analysis in the diagnostic process of breast cancer: An Italian monocentric experience.

The clinical utility of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing is well established in patients with family history suggestive for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. Recently, germline PALB2 pathogenic variants were also associated with an increased risk of breast and other cancers and, in the Italian population, it has been described in few studies without a systematic germline analysis of BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2. In this study, we described ASST Sette Laghi cancer genetic counselling services' experience in the analysis of 402 patients with suspected breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, by using BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2 germline genetic test. The frequency of PALB2 pathogenic variants was 1.2% compared to 3.5% and 3.2% for BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively, whereas class 3 variants were detected in 0.3% and 0.5% of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 investigated patients, respectively. PALB2 pathogenic variants were identified in patients with a strong family history for breast cancer. Moreover, PALB2 variants were significantly associated with a younger age of breast cancer onset (mean age, 40.25 years) compared to wild-type patients (mean age 51.2 years, p-value = 0.0331). Similar to BRCA-associated breast cancer, the majority of PALB2 breast cancers were identified at an advanced clinical stage. Pedigree analysis revealed a family history of breast and ovarian cancer syndrome in all PALB2 pathogenic variants carriers (early breast cancer onset, bilateral breast cancer and ovarian cancer). In conclusion, the germline analysis of BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2 should be included in breast cancer clinical practice as a not negligible number of PALB2 carriers could be identified and referred to specific surveillance protocols.

Development of a novel prediction model for carriage of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant in Japanese patients with breast cancer based on Japanese organization of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer registry data.

With the increasing demand for BRCA genetic testing, most existing prediction models were developed using data from individuals of European descent. This study aimed to identify clinicopathological factors of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome and develop the first Japanese-specific prediction model for BRCA pathogenic variant carriers in Japan. We utilized data from 3072 Japanese patients with breast cancer aggregated by the Japanese Organization of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer registry. Prediction models were developed using 70% of the overall dataset and validated using the remaining 30%. Factors associated with the BRCA pathogenic variant status were identified using logistic univariate analysis, and significant factors were further analyzed using logistic multivariate analysis to develop prediction models for BRCA1/2 (BRCA1 and/or BRCA2), BRCA1, and BRCA2 pathogenic variants. BRCA1 showed associations with aggressive clinicopathological factors such as triple-negative breast cancer and nuclear grade 3. Moreover, the prediction model showed a high area under the curve (AUC) of 0.879. By contrast, BRCA2 exhibited fewer characteristic associated factors, and the AUC of the model was 0.669. Common factors shared by BRCA1/2, BRCA1, and BRCA2 were the age at diagnosis of breast cancer and the youngest age of relatives with breast cancer. Consistent with previous research, early-onset breast cancer appeared to be strongly associated with HBOC. We successfully developed prediction models for BRCA1/2, BRCA1, and BRCA2 pathogenic variants. By accurately stratifying patients' risk and guiding targeted screening and preventative interventions, these models will contribute to improved management and outcomes of HBOC.

Evaluation of an Italian Population-Based Programme for Risk Assessment and Genetic Counselling and Testing for BRCA1/2-Related Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer after 10 Years of Operation: An Observational Study Protocol.

Hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome is caused by the inheritance of monoallelic germline BRCA1/2 gene mutations. If BRCA1/2 mutation carriers are identified before the disease develops, effective actions against HBOC can be taken, including intensive screening, risk-reducing mastectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy, and risk-reducing medications. The Italian National Prevention Plan mandates the creation of regional BRCA genetic testing programmes. So far, however, only informal data have been reported on their implementation. We have designed a study aimed at evaluating the results of a population-based programme for risk assessment and genetic counselling and testing for BRCA1/2-related HBOC that is underway in the Emilia-Romagna region (northern Italy). The programme-which is entirely free-includes basic screening with an estimate of the likelihood of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation using a familial risk assessment tool, a closer examination of women with suspected risk increase, an assessment of the need for further genetic counselling and, if needed, genetic testing and risk-reducing interventions. In this paper, the design of the programme and the protocol of the study are presented. The study has an observational, historical cohort design. Eligible are the women found to be at an increased risk of HBOC (profile 3 women). The main objectives are (i) to determine the precision of the programme in measuring the level of risk of HBOC for profile 3 women; (ii) to determine the characteristics of profile 3 women and their association with the risk management strategy chosen; (iii) to compare the age at onset, histologic type, tumour stage, molecular subtype, and prognosis of breast/ovarian cancers observed in the cohort of profile 3 women with the features of sporadic cancers observed in the general female population; (iv) to determine the level and the determinants of adherence to recommendations; and (v) to determine the appropriateness and timing of risk-reducing surgery and medications. Investigating the quality and results of the programme is necessary because the best practices in risk assessment and genetic counselling and testing for BRCA1/2-related cancer and the challenges they encounter should be identified and shared. The study has the potential to provide sound empirical evidence for the factors affecting the effectiveness of this type of service.

Online Provision of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Health Information: A Search Engine Driven Systematic Web-Based Analysis.

BRCA genetic testing is available for UK Jewish individuals but the provision of information online for BRCA is unknown. We aimed to evaluate online provision of BRCA information by UK organisations (UKO), UK Jewish community organisations (JCO), and genetic testing providers (GTP). Google searches for organisations offering BRCA information were performed using relevant sets of keywords. The first 100 website links were categorised into UKOs/JCOs/GTPs; additional JCOs were supplemented through community experts. Websites were reviewed using customised questionnaires for BRCA information. Information provision was assessed for five domains: accessibility, scope, depth, accuracy, and quality. These domains were combined to provide a composite score (maximum score = 5). Results were screened (n = 6856) and 45 UKOs, 16 JCOs, and 18 GTPs provided BRCA information. Accessibility was high (84%,66/79). Scope was lacking with 35% (28/79) addressing >50% items. Most (82%, 65/79) described BRCA-associated cancers: breast and/or ovarian cancer was mentioned by 78%(62/79), but only 34% (27/79) mentioned ≥1 pancreatic, prostate, melanoma. Few websites provided carrier frequencies in the general (24%,19/79) and Jewish populations (20%,16/79). Only 15% (12/79) had quality information with some/minimal shortcomings. Overall information provision was low-to-moderate: median scores UKO = 2.1 (IQR = 1), JCO = 1.6 (IQR = 0.9), and GTP = 2.3 (IQR = 1) (maximum-score = 5). There is a scarcity of high-quality BRCA information online. These findings have implications for UK Jewish BRCA programmes and those considering BRCA testing.

Intersectionality, BRCA Genetic Testing, and Intrafamilial Communication of Risk: A Qualitative Study.

Significant health disparities exist in relation to pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2. This study aimed to better understand the barriers and facilitators to BRCA1/2 genetic testing and intrafamilial communication of risk in racially and ethnically diverse individuals. We conducted qualitative interviews with non-Hispanic White (n = 11) and Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC) individuals (n = 14) who underwent testing for pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants. We employed template analysis, case study analysis, and comparative case study analysis to examine healthcare experiences related to genetic testing as well as intrafamilial communication of risk. Applying an intersectional lens, we sought to inform more person-centered approaches to precision healthcare and help dismantle disparities in genomic healthcare. Template analysis revealed salient factors at the individual (psychosocial well-being), interpersonal/familial, and healthcare system levels. A two-part case study analysis provided insights into how race/ethnicity, cultural norms, and socioeconomic status interact with systemic and structural inequities to compound disparities. These findings underscore the need for person-centered, tailored, and culturally sensitive approaches to understanding and addressing the complexities surrounding testing and the communication of BRCA risk. Applying an intersectional lens can inform more person-centered approaches to precision healthcare and may help to surmount existing disparities.

Understanding Social, Cultural, and Religious Factors Influencing Medical Decision-Making on BRCA1/2 Genetic Testing in the Orthodox Jewish Community

Introduction: Although the prevalence of a pathogenic variant in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes is about 1:400 (0.25%) in the general population, the prevalence is as high as 1:40 (2.5%) among the Ashkenazi Jewish population. Despite cost-effective preventive measures for mutation carriers, Orthodox Jews constitute a cultural and religious group that requires different approaches to BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing relative to other groups. This study analyzed a dialog of key stakeholders and community members to explore factors that influence decision-making about BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing in the New York Orthodox Jewish community. Methods: Qualitative research methods, based on Grounded Theory and Narrative Research, were utilized to analyze the narrative data collected from 49 key stakeholders and community members. A content analysis was conducted to identify themes; inter-rater reliability was 71%. Results: Facilitators of genetic testing were a desire for preventive interventions and education, while barriers to genetic testing included negative emotions, feared impact on family/romantic relationships, cost, and stigma. Views differed on the role of religious leaders and healthcare professionals in medical decision-making. Education, health, and community were discussed as influential factors, and concerns were expressed about disclosure, implementation, and information needs. Conclusion: This study elicited the opinions of Orthodox Jewish women (decision-makers) and key stakeholders (influencers) who play critical roles in the medical decision-making process. The findings have broad implications for engaging community stakeholders within faith-based or culturally distinct groups to ensure better utilization of healthcare services for cancer screening and prevention designed to improve population health.

Results of a randomized controlled trial of a decision support intervention for disclosing maternal BRCA genetic test results to children and adolescents.

Evaluate the impact of a targeted family communication intervention for mothers undergoing genetic counseling and testing (GCT) for BRCA gene alterations. Following BRCA GCT, mothers (N = 204; M age = 45 y) were randomized to either a control condition (self-help print materials) or intervention (printed decision support guide, based on behavioral decision making theory in health care) for supporting choices about disclosing maternal genetic test results to children and adolescents. Behavioral assessments were administered prior to maternal GCT and after receipt of results: primary outcomes were maternal disclosure to children and parent-child communication quality. Mothers in the intervention were > 2x likely to disclose their BRCA test results to their children compared to those in the control condition (odds ratio [OR] = 2.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06, 5.10; p = .04). This effect was moderated by children's ages: mothers of preteens (<13 y) assigned to the intervention were >3x likely to disclose their results (OR = 3.74, 95% CI = 1.49, 9.41; p = .005). In adjusted models, intervention was also associated with favorable changes in the quality of parent-child communication (95% CI = 0.30, 9.00; p < .05). Decision support improves parent-child communication outcomes about GCT for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer. This trial is among the first to empirically evaluate the outcomes of a behavioral intervention to support family communication of maternal BRCA risk information to children.

How reliable are post-mastectomy breast reconstruction videos on YouTube?

305 Background: Social media are a significant source of information for young women with breast cancer (YWBC) undergoing post-mastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR). The emphasis on visual storytelling and building community in online spaces renders YouTube (YT) to be a common platform for discussions of BR. This study aims to assess the quality of YT videos about PMBR, identify themes related to the PMBR experience, and quantify perceptions of BR as an option PM. Methods: YT was searched incognito with terms “young women breast cancer reconstruction” in 08/2022, in order from most to least viewed. Title, upload date, length, poster identity, number of likes and comments were collected. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for audiovisual materials (PEMAT A/V) was used to evaluate understandability and actionability. DISCERN assessed quality and reliability. Presence of sponsorship, intended audience, patient and healthcare professional narratives, and perceptions of PMBR were collected. Reviewers noted whether PMBR was shown and how. Themes were collected inductively and deductively for thematic analysis. Results: 193 videos were identified. Mean video length was 14.6 minutes (SD 20.0 min). 87.1% included sponsorships. 95.9% of videos were posted by an organization. 60.6% were information-based; 45.6% experience-based. Mean PEMAT scores for understandability and actionability were 71.3% (SD 13.4) and 35.7% (SD 41.8), respectively. Mean DISCERN was 2.6/5 (SD 1.2). Patient narrative was present in 52.6% and healthcare professionals’ in 68.4%. PMBR was visually presented 22.8% of the time. 13.5% of videos explicitly recommended PMBR. 2.6% explicitly discouraged it. Patients (77.7%) are the majority of the intended audience. Most common deductively identified themes included treatment (87.1%), family relationship (17.1%), motherhood ( 15.5%), fertility (11.9%). Inductively identified subthemes included differentiating between various options for PMBR surgery, BRCA genetic testing, psychosocial effects of breast cancer and PMBR, and recovery from surgery. Conclusions: YT is a platform wherein various PMBR options are widely discussed and explained. PMBR videos are highly understandable but have moderate levels of actionability, quality, and reliability. Videos are highly sponsored, demonstrating significant institutional bias. Themes are overwhelmingly treatment and surgery-based. Personal themes were present but not dominant.[Table: see text]

MO52-4 Examination of patient characteristics in breast cancer patients who underwent BRCA genetic testing, according to reason for taking the test

MO52-4 Examination of patient characteristics in breast cancer patients who underwent BRCA genetic testing, according to reason for taking the test

Prenatal Evaluation of a Fetal Cystic Hygroma: An Unexpected Finding of a De Novo Fetal BRCA1 Deletion Case Report

This case presents a novel occurrence of a de novo BRCA1 gene deletion in a fetus with a cystic hygroma. Chorionic villus sampling (CVS) was performed for chromosome G-banding analysis, demonstrating a normal karyotype: 46, XX. Chromosome microarray analysis performed as a reflex test revealed an 80 kb deletion on 17q21.31, encompassing the BRCA1 gene. Follow-up FISH analysis performed on parental blood samples yielded negative results, confirming that the deletion was de novo in the fetus. Subsequent anatomic ultrasound evaluation showed no identifiable structural defects, and it was concluded that the microdeletion was unlikely to be the cause of the cystic hygroma. Regardless, it will be imperative that the patient’s daughter be appropriately counseled regarding the implications of carrying a BRCA1 deletion and the need for heightened surveillance in adulthood. As BRCA1 genetic testing is traditionally performed on adult patients with informed consent, this case report highlights the need for ongoing conversations and research in the management of incidental fetal diagnosis discovered during routine prenatal testing, as well as the care and counseling of these patients and their families.

"Out of the blue": A qualitative study exploring the experiences of women and next of kin receiving unexpected results from BRA-STRAP research gene panel testing.

In the genomic era, the availability of gene panel and whole genome/exome sequencing is rapidly increasing. Opportunities for providing former patients with new genetic information are also increasing over time and recontacting former patients with new information is likely to become more common. Breast cancer Refined Analysis of Sequence Tests-Risk And Penetrance (BRA-STRAP) is an Australian study of individuals who had previously undertaken BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing, with no pathogenic variants detected. Using a waiver of consent, stored DNA samples were retested using a breast/ovarian cancer gene panel and clinically significant results returned to the patient (or next of kin, if deceased). This qualitative study aimed to explore patient experiences, opinions, and expectations of recontacting in the Australian hereditary cancer setting. Participants were familial cancer clinic patients (or next of kin) who were notified of a new pathogenic variant identified via BRA-STRAP. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted approximately 6 weeks post-result. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using an inductive thematic approach. Thirty participants (all female; average age = 57; range 36-84) were interviewed. Twenty-five were probands, and five were next of kin. Most women reported initial shock upon being recontacted with unexpected news, after having obtained a sense of closure related to their initial genetic testing experiences and cancer diagnosis. For most, this initial distress was short-lived, followed by a process of readjustment, meaning-making and adaptation that was facilitated by perceived clinical and personal utility of the information. Women were overall satisfied with the waiver of consent approach and recontacting process. Results are in line with previous studies suggesting that patients have positive attitudes about recontacting. Women in this study valued new genetic information gained from retesting and were satisfied with the BRA-STRAP recontact model. Practice implications to facilitate readjustment and promote psychosocial adaptation were identified.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF BRCA1 GENE SEQUENCING AND ITS PROMOTER METHYLATION TESTING IN THE SEARCH STRATEGY FOR THERAPEUTIC TARGETS IN BREAST CANCER TREATMENT.

Currently, there is a great interest in the genetic testing of BRCA1 and BRCA2 due to the fact that for patients with breast cancer (BC) with pathogenic variants of these genes, the use of the PARP inhibitors could be also provided in addition to implemented treatment protocols. The aim of this study was to characterize the molecular genetic structure of the BRCA1 gene in BC patients without progenitor germline mutations taking into account the methylation state of the promoter region. The study involved 210 patients with newly diagnosed BC. The most common germline pathogenic variants of the BRCA1 (185delAG, 5382insC, 4153delA, T300G) and BRCA2 (6174delT) genes were identified in the peripheral blood. A subgroup of 14 patients without progenitor pathological variants of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes and with a family history of cancer was randomly selected. For them, BRCA1 gene sequencing by Sanger and hypermethylation of the BRCA1 gene promoter region were analyzed. The following frequencies of BRCA1 mutations were determined in the general group: 5382insC - 8.6%, 4153delA - 0.5%, T300G - 0.5%. The analysis of the BRCA1 gene by Sanger sequencing revealed 11 BRCA1 gene variants in 10 out of 14 BC patients. All of them, according to the currently available data, were defined as "benign" and not clinically relevant. The frequency of the detection of hypermethylation of the BRCA1 gene promoter region in the randomly selected group of patients was 14.3%. In BC patients, not only common mutations but also the methylation status of the BRCA1 gene promoter region in the peripheral blood should be determined. The whole-genome sequencing of the BRCA1 gene may be the last step in determining the genetic characteristics of BC patients carried out to optimize the treatment and improve survival thanks to the higher prevalence of the progenitor mutations and hypermethylation of the BRCA1 gene promoter.

Evaluation of the Rosa Chatbot Providing Genetic Information to Patients at Risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Qualitative Interview Study.

Genetic testing has become an integrated part of health care for patients with breast or ovarian cancer, and the increasing demand for genetic testing is accompanied by an increasing need for easy access to reliable genetic information for patients. Therefore, we developed a chatbot app (Rosa) that is able to perform humanlike digital conversations about genetic BRCA testing. Before implementing this new information service in daily clinical practice, we wanted to explore 2 aspects of chatbot use: the perceived utility and trust in chatbot technology among healthy patients at risk of hereditary cancer and how interaction with a chatbot regarding sensitive information about hereditary cancer influences patients. Overall, 175 healthy individuals at risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer were invited to test the chatbot, Rosa, before and after genetic counseling. To secure a varied sample, participants were recruited from all cancer genetic clinics in Norway, and the selection was based on age, gender, and risk of having a BRCA pathogenic variant. Among the 34.9% (61/175) of participants who consented for individual interview, a selected subgroup (16/61, 26%) shared their experience through in-depth interviews via video. The semistructured interviews covered the following topics: usability, perceived usefulness, trust in the information received via the chatbot, how Rosa influenced the user, and thoughts about future use of digital tools in health care. The transcripts were analyzed using the stepwise-deductive inductive approach. The overall finding was that the chatbot was very welcomed by the participants. They appreciated the 24/7 availability wherever they were and the possibility to use it to prepare for genetic counseling and to repeat and ask questions about what had been said afterward. As Rosa was created by health care professionals, they also valued the information they received as being medically correct. Rosa was referred to as being better than Google because it provided specific and reliable answers to their questions. The findings were summed up in 3 concepts: "Anytime, anywhere"; "In addition, not instead"; and "Trustworthy and true." All participants (16/16) denied increased worry after reading about genetic testing and hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in Rosa. Our results indicate that a genetic information chatbot has the potential to contribute to easy access to uniform information for patients at risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, regardless of geographical location. The 24/7 availability of quality-assured information, tailored to the specific situation, had a reassuring effect on our participants. It was consistent across concepts that Rosa was a tool for preparation and repetition; however, none of the participants (0/16) supported that Rosa could replace genetic counseling if hereditary cancer was confirmed. This indicates that a chatbot can be a well-suited digital companion to genetic counseling.

How reliable are post-mastectomy breast reconstruction videos on YouTube?

11021 Background: Social media are a significant source of information for young women with breast cancer (YWBC) undergoing post-mastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR). The emphasis on visual storytelling and building community in online spaces renders YouTube (YT) to be a common platform for discussions of BR. This study aims to assess the quality of YT videos about PMBR, identify themes related to the PMBR experience, and quantify perceptions of BR as an option PM. Methods: YT was searched incognito with terms “young women breast cancer reconstruction” in 08/2022, in order from most to least viewed. Title, upload date, length, poster identity, number of likes and comments were collected. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for audiovisual materials (PEMAT A/V) evaluated understandability and actionability. DISCERN assessed quality and reliability. Presence of sponsorship, intended audience, patient and healthcare professional narratives, and perceptions of PMBR were collected. Reviewers noted whether PMBR was shown and how. Themes were collected inductively and deductively for thematic analysis. Results: 193 videos were identified. Mean video length was 14.6 minutes (SD 20.0 min). 87.1% included sponsorships. 95.9% of videos were posted by an organization. 60.6% were information-based; 45.6% experience-based. Mean PEMAT scores for understandability and actionability were 71.3% (SD 13.4) and 35.7% (SD 41.8), respectively. Mean DISCERN was 2.6/5 (SD 1.2). Patient narrative was present in 52.6% and healthcare professionals’ in 68.4%. PMBR was visually presented 22.8% of the time. 13.5% of videos explicitly recommended PMBR. 2.6% explicitly discouraged it. Patients (77.7%) represent the majority of the intended audience. Most common deductively identified themes included treatment (87.1%), family relationship (17.1%), motherhood (15.5%), fertility (11.9%). Inductively identified subthemes included differentiating between various options for PMBR surgery, BRCA genetic testing, psychosocial effects of breast cancer and PMBR, and recovery from surgery. Conclusions: YT is a platform wherein various PMBR options are widely discussed and explained. PMBR videos are highly understandable but have moderate levels of actionability, quality, and reliability. Videos are highly sponsored, demonstrating significant institutional bias. Themes are overwhelmingly treatment and surgery-based. Personal themes were present but not dominant. Distribution of PEMAT and DISCERN scores. [Table: see text]

Comparison of BRCA genetic testing and subsequent treatment with PARP inhibitors (PARPi) for ederly vs non-elderly women with non-mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC): A large prospective cohort study from the Australian National Gynaecology Oncology Registry (NGOR).

e17566 Background: The 5-year survival rate for elderly women (≥ 75 years) with ovarian cancer is 25%. Germline mutations in BRCA1/BRCA2 are identified in approximately 15% of newly diagnosed women with ovarian cancer and have implications for prognosis and predicted benefit of both platinum chemotherapy and PARPi therapy. Objectives: To compare differences in, and subsequent management of Elderly (aged ≥75 years) vs Non-elderly (aged &lt;75 years) women with non-mucinous EOC who underwent germline and somatic BRCA1/BRCA2 testing across the Australian NGOR sites from 2017 – 2022. Methods: Clinical data were sourced from NGOR patient databases and assessed to confirm accuracy prior to analysis. Results: Data on 1579 eligible women between May 2017 and July 2022 across 21 hospitals were collected. Patient characteristics are summarised in Table 1. The rates of germline testing in Elderly women was 51% compared to 71% in Non-elderly women and this difference was statistically significant (p&lt;0.001). The rates of somatic testing in Elderly women was 28% compared to 33% in Non-elderly women although this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.2). In Elderly women with either germline or somatic pathogenic BRCA mutations and Stage III/IV disease, 67% received PARPi within 8 weeks of chemotherapy completion compared to 53% in Non-elderly women. In a multi-variate analysis, the most significant characteristic associated with reduced germline testing was the ‘Elderly’ compared to ‘Non-elderly’ group (OR 0.41, 95% CI: 0.30-0.58, p &lt; 0.001). Germline testing was more likely to be conducted in postcodes associated with higher Socioeconomic status (SES) quintiles 2-5 compared to quintile 1 (OR 2.06, 95% CI: 1.50-2.81, p&lt; 0.001) and in those women receiving operative and chemotherapy treatment compared to chemotherapy alone (OR 1.84, 95% CI: 1.08-3.11, p=0.024). Conclusions: The rates of germline and somatic BRCA testing are lower than anticipated, particularly germline testing in Elderly women. Women known to have pathogenic germline or somatic BRCA mutations may have received PARPi at lower rates than expected. Further studies are required to understand the cause of such variations, including accounting for the advent of government funded BRCA testing, PARPi funding and correlating effects on survival. [Table: see text]

A new population screening program for BRCA mutations in Israel – Attitudes and barriers among Ashkenazi Jewish women

Israeli Jewish women of Ashkenazi ancestry have a high BRCA mutation carrier rate. Therefore, recently, Israel included free genetic testing among all Jewish women with Ashkenazi ancestry, 25 yrs. and older in its public health system. The aim of this study was to assess the intention of eligible women to be tested for BRCA mutations, and to find factors that may affect their decision. We distributed an online survey to a panel of participants in a commercial research institute. The survey included socio-demographic characteristics, attitudes towards preventive actions, views related to benefits and limitations of performing the BRCA test, worry regarding cancer morbidity, knowledge about breast cancer morbidity and hereditary breast cancer genetics. The survey concluded with a question regarding the woman’s interest in undergoing the BRCA test. The results showed that among the 506 respondents, 250 (49%) were interested in BRCA testing, 42 (8%) objected and 214 (43%) were undecided. In comparing the undecided to the other groups, we found that most presented a positive attitude towards screening tests and preventive medicine, they showed acceptable knowledge about the proposed test, and yet were interested in learning and further expanding the knowledge and the consequences of doing the test. Most respondents of all groups expressed concern of breast cancer morbidity and were reluctant to perform the test for reasons of reducing uncertainty, implications for children and implications for their own health. Within all groups, many women expressed their desire to consult with a medical professional about the test. We conclude that aiming to improve the performance of BRCA genetic testing, women need a thorough explanation about its implications. The main way to inform them would be by medical professionals, especially in primary care. This implies that front line nurses and physicians need to become more knowledgeable and committed to this subject.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutation analysis from a cohort of 1267 patients at high risk for breast cancer in Brazil

We determined the frequency and mutational spectrum of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in a series of patients at high risk for developing breast cancer from Brazil. A total of 1267 patients were referred for BRCA genetic testing, and no obligation of fulfilling criteria of mutation probability methods for molecular screening was applied. Germline deleterious mutations in BRCA1/2 (i.e., pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants) were identified in 156 out of 1267 patients (12%). We confirm recurrent mutations in BRCA1/2, but we also report three novel mutations in BRCA2, not previously reported in any public databases or other studies. Variants of unknown significance (VUS) represent only 2% in this dataset and most of them were detected in BRCA2. The overall mutation prevalence in BRCA1/2 was higher in patients diagnosed with cancer at age > 35years old, and with family history of cancer. The present data expand our knowledge of BRCA1/2 germline mutational spectrum, and it is a valuable clinical resource for genetic counseling and cancer management programs in the country.

Measuring high-risk parents' opinions about direct-to-consumer genetic testing for adult-onset inherited cancer syndromes in their adolescent and young adult children.

Neither direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing nor predictive genetic testing for adult-onset conditions is recommended for minor children due to ethical concerns and low clinical utility. However, parents with pathogenic variants (PVs) in disease-causing genes may be interested in pursuing genetic testing that includes the familial PV for their children. The Pediatric Testing Attitudes Scale (P-TAS) was previously developed to examine high-risk parents' opinions about pediatric BRCA genetic testing for adult-onset breast/ovarian cancer. Here, the psychometric properties of the P-TAS were examined in a new sample of N=126 parents (M age=47.2 years) with PVs in a more complete set of cancer risk genes represented on DTC panel tests. The mean score on the P-TAS was 44 out of a maximum score of 60, indicating that a majority of parents generally held favorable opinions about testing their children for adult-onset inherited cancer syndromes. The internal consistency of the full scale was high (α=0.91). A factor analysis identified two-component scales, labeled Attitudes and Beliefs (α=0.93) and Decision Making and Communication (α=0.83). In a multivariable regression model, P-TAS co-factors accounted for 34% of variance in parental opinions, including the frequency of prior family communication about cancer and the likelihood of utilizing DTC genetic testing with children (R2 =0.34, p < 0.001). Results suggest that the P-TAS remains a reliable measure to assess high-risk parents' opinions about pediatric DTC genetic testing for adult-onset conditions, with promising validity. Applications of the P-TAS include informing genetic counseling practice, pediatric medical care, and policy guidelines surrounding DTC genetic testing.