Breast Cancer BRCA2 Research Articles

Second Primary Cancer Risks After Breast Cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variant Carriers.

Second primary cancer (SPC) risks after breast cancer (BC) in BRCA1/BRCA2 pathogenic variant (PV) carriers are uncertain. We estimated relative and absolute risks using a novel linkage of genetic testing data to population-scale National Disease Registration Service and Hospital Episode Statistics electronic health records. We followed 25,811 females and 480 males diagnosed with BC and tested for germline BRCA1/BRCA2 PVs in NHS Clinical Genetics centers in England between 1995 and 2019 until SPC diagnosis, death, migration, contralateral breast/ovarian surgery plus 1 year, or the 31st of December 2020. We estimated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) using English population incidences, hazard ratios (HRs) comparing carriers to noncarriers using Cox regression, and Kaplan-Meier 10-year cumulative risks. There were 1,840 BRCA1 and 1,750 BRCA2 female PV carriers. Compared with population incidences, BRCA1 carriers had elevated contralateral BC (CBC; SIR, 15.6 [95% CI, 11.8 to 20.2]), ovarian (SIR, 44.0 [95% CI, 31.4 to 59.9]), combined nonbreast/ovarian (SIR, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.59 to 2.92]), colorectal (SIR, 4.80 [95% CI, 2.62 to 8.05]), and endometrial (SIR, 2.92 [95% CI, 1.07 to 6.35]) SPC risks. BRCA2 carriers had elevated CBC (SIR, 7.70 [95% CI, 5.45 to 10.6]), ovarian (SIR, 16.8 [95% CI, 10.3 to 26.0]), pancreatic (SIR, 5.42 [95% CI, 2.09 to 12.5]), and combined nonbreast/ovarian (SIR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.24 to 2.23]) SPC risks. Compared with females without BRCA1/BRCA2 PVs on testing, BRCA1 carriers had elevated CBC (HR, 3.60 [95% CI, 2.65 to 4.90]), ovarian (HR, 33.0 [95% CI, 19.1 to 57.1]), combined nonbreast/ovarian (HR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.05 to 2.01]), and colorectal (HR, 2.93 [95% CI, 1.53 to 5.62]) SPC risks. BRCA2 carriers had elevated CBC (HR, 2.40 [95% CI, 1.70 to 3.40]), ovarian (HR, 12.0 [95% CI, 6.70 to 21.5]), and pancreatic (HR, 3.56 [95% CI, 1.34 to 9.48]) SPC risks. Ten-year cumulative CBC, ovarian, and combined nonbreast/ovarian cancer risks were 16%/6.3%/7.8% (BRCA1 carriers), 12%/3.0%/6.2% (BRCA2 carriers), and 3.6%/0.4%/4.9% (noncarriers). Male BRCA2 carriers had higher CBC (HR, 13.1 [95% CI, 1.19 to 146]) and prostate (HR, 5.61 [95% CI, 1.96 to 16.0]) SPC risks than noncarriers. Survivors of BC carrying BRCA1 and BRCA2 PVs are at high SPC risk. They may benefit from enhanced surveillance and risk-reduction measures.

Tumor purity estimated from bulk DNA methylation can be used for adjusting beta values of individual samples to better reflect tumor biology.

Epigenetic deregulation through altered DNA methylation is a fundamental feature of tumorigenesis, but tumor data from bulk tissue samples contain different proportions of malignant and non-malignant cells that may confound the interpretation of DNA methylation values. The adjustment of DNA methylation data based on tumor purity has been proposed to render both genome-wide and gene-specific analyses more precise, but it requires sample purity estimates. Here we present PureBeta, a single-sample statistical framework that uses genome-wide DNA methylation data to first estimate sample purity and then adjust methylation values of individual CpGs to correct for sample impurity. Purity values estimated with the algorithm have high correlation (>0.8) to reference values obtained from DNA sequencing when applied to samples from breast carcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma, and lung squamous cell carcinoma. Methylation beta values adjusted based on purity estimates have a more binary distribution that better reflects theoretical methylation states, thus facilitating improved biological inference as shown for BRCA1 in breast cancer. PureBeta is a versatile tool that can be used for different Illumina DNA methylation arrays and can be applied to individual samples of different cancer types to enhance biological interpretability of methylation data.

Effects of clinical covariates on serum miRNA expression among women without ovarian cancer.

Serum microRNAs (miRNAs) are potential biomarkers for ovarian cancer; however, many factors may influence miRNA expression. To understand potential confounders in miRNA analysis, we examined how sociodemographic factors and comorbidities, including known ovarian cancer risk factors, influence serum miRNA levels in women without ovarian cancer. Data from 1,576 women from the Mass General Brigham Biobank collected between 2012 and 2019, excluding subjects previously or subsequently diagnosed with ovarian cancer, were examined. Using a focused panel of 179 miRNA probes optimized for serum profiling, miRNA expression was measured by flow cytometry using the Abcam Fireplex® assay and correlated with subjects' electronic medical records. The study population broadly reflected the New England population. The median age of subjects was 49 years, 34% were current or prior smokers, 33% were obese (BMI >30kg/m2), 49% were postmenopausal, and 11% had undergone prior bilateral oophorectomy. Significant differences in miRNA expression were observed among ovarian risk factors such as age, obesity, menopause, BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutations or breast cancer in family history. Additionally, miRNA expression was significantly altered by prior bilateral oophorectomy, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia. Other variables, such as smoking, parity, age at menarche, hormonal replacement therapy, oral contraception, breast, endometrial, or colon cancer, and diabetes were not associated with significant changes in the panel when corrected for multiple testing. Serum miRNA expression patterns are significantly affected by patient demographics, exposure history, and medical comorbidities. Understanding confounders in serum miRNA expression is important for refining clinical assays for cancer screening.

Abstract PO3-08-03: Comparing prognosis for BRCA1, BRCA2 and non-BRCA breast cancer

Abstract BACKGROUND Breast Cancer (BC) is the most diagnosed malignancy and the leading cause of cancer death in women worldwide. Approximately 10% of BC cases are hereditary, and up to 25% have been linked to germline variants of specific genes. Germline pathogenic variants (PV) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, which account for 20% of familial BC cases, are highly penetrant and are associated with Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. BRCA1 e BRCA2 are tumor suppressor genes, which interact with recombination/DNA repair proteins in pathways that participate in preserving intact chromosome structure, particularly on the DNA double chain. So far, more than 7000 PV were identified on these genes, including the Portuguese founder mutation (BRCA2 c.156_157insAlu), which accounts for a great proportion of BC cases in our country. BRCA1 and BRCA2 associated BC have distinct clinicopathological characteristics. Long-term follow-up data related to prognosis and survival of either BRCA1 or BRCA2 BC patients is conflicting. Two large meta-analysis report worse overall survival for both, when compared to sporadic BC, whereas two other large meta-analysis concluded on worse overall survival only for BRCA1 patients, with similar overall survival for BRCA2 patients. One meta-analysis reports similar survival for both groups. We report the analysis of our cohort of BRCA1/2 BC patients included in our multidisciplinary program. Our goal is to compare clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis between BRCA1 and BRCA2 BC and with a control group without germline PV (non-BRCA). METHODS Prospective follow-up was proposed to patients with a diagnosed BRCA1/2 PV. This study included BRCA1/2 patients with BC as first cancer diagnosis, observed between January 2000-May 2023. A control group, with similar phenotype and histological characteristics, without germline PV was used. Statistical analysis was performed to compare characteristics and prognosis between BRCA1 and BRCA2 and non-BRCA BC. ANOVA test was used to compare the age at diagnosis; chi-square was used to compare categorical variables, such as histological subtype and clinical staging at diagnosis; log rank was used to compare the primary and secondary endpoints – overall survival (OS) and invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), respectively. RESULTS From 1077 individuals who tested positive for BRCA1/2 PV, 345 patients had BC, mostly with a BRCA2 PV (66.4%). A control group of 339 individuals was assembled. BRCA2 BC was mostly luminal, as non-BRCA patients, compared with BRCA1 (73.8% vs. 65.8% vs. 25.9%, p< 0.001) and BRCA1 was mostly triple negative, compared with non-BRCA and BRCA2 (65.5% vs. 16.5% vs. 13.3%, p< 0.001). For a mean follow-up time of 10.6 years (±5.6), recurrence was similar, with central nervous system (CNS) metastases being more frequent for BRCA1 (66.7% vs. 23.7% in non-BRCA, and vs. 9.1% in BRCA2, p< 0.001), and bone metastases were predominant for BRCA2 BC (57.5% vs 33.3% in non-BRCA, and vs. 9.1% in BRCA1, p=0.003). Non-BRCA BC showed longer time to recurrence (99.3 months vs. 76.5 months in BRCA2 BC, and vs. 61.2 months in BRCA1 BC, p=0.010), although longer OS was observed in BRCA2 BC (136.2 months vs. 121.7 months in BRCA1 BC, and vs. 113.2 months in non-BRCA, p< 0.001). Development of second primary tumors was more frequent in BRCA2 patients, compared with BRCA1 (20.9% vs 9.2%, p=0.002). DISCUSSION In the Portuguese population, BRCA2 BC is more frequent than BRCA1 BC. Relapses occurred later for BRCA2 BC, affecting mostly the bone, whereas BRCA1 BC relapsed in CNS. As it is stated in the literature, BRCA1 BC is consistent with triple negative, as BRCA2 BC is more associated with luminal subtype. Differences in iDFS favored non-BRCA patients, whereas OS was significantly improved in BRCA2 BC patients. This is the biggest cohort presented in the Portuguese population and one of the biggest presenting BRCA2 BC patients. Table 1 Characteristics of patients according to BRCA1/2 mutation status (n = 684) Citation Format: Pedro Antunes Meireles, Catarina Bexiga, Sofia Fragoso, Sidónia Santos, Teresa Duarte, Fátima Vaz. Comparing prognosis for BRCA1, BRCA2 and non-BRCA breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-08-03.

Abstract GS02-04: Surgical Treatment of Women with Breast Cancer and a BRCA1 Mutation: An International Analysis of the Impact of Bilateral Mastectomy on Survival

Abstract Background: Women with breast cancer and a BRCA1 mutation face a high risk of contralateral breast cancer. For this reason, many women with a unilateral breast cancer opt for bilateral mastectomies. Some will have a contralateral prophylactic mastectomy as a second surgery. However, it is not clear to what extent this operation impacts breast cancer mortality. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the differences in survival by surgical treatment in an international cohort of women with a BRCA1 mutation and unilateral breast cancer. Methods: Eligible participants were identified from a large international cohort of women with breast cancer and a BRCA1 mutation, from 26 collaborating centres. Patients with DCIS and stage IV breast cancer were excluded. Patients with synchronous bilateral cancer were excluded. Demographic data were patient reported and clinical and treatment data were collected from medical records. Women were followed from date of breast cancer diagnosis to either date of last follow-up or date of death. Results: There were 2482 eligible participants from 26 centres from 11 countries. The mean age of breast cancer diagnosis was 43.1 years (range 18-70 years). Among those who had a unilateral mastectomy or lumpectomy, the risk of contralateral breast cancer at 20 years was 27.5%. After experiencing a contralateral cancer the hazard ratio for breast cancer death was 2.14 (95%CI 1.43-3.18), P=0.0002. The fifteen-year breast cancer specific survival in the entire cohort was 82.9%. The survival was 78.7% for those who had a unilateral mastectomy, 86.2% for those who had a lumpectomy, and 88.7% for those who had bilateral mastectomies. 529 of the women who initially underwent a unilateral surgery subsequently had a contralateral or bilateral preventive mastectomy in the follow up period. 529 of the women with unilateral surgery had a contralateral or bilateral preventive mastectomy in the follow up period. After adjusting for age of diagnosis, tumor size, nodal status, chemotherapy (yes/no) and preventive mastectomy (time dependent) the hazard ratio for breast cancer mortality for bilateral surgery versus unilateral surgery was 0.78 (95% CI 0.55-1.13), p = 0.19. Discussion: Women with a BRCA1 mutation and breast cancer who develop a contralateral breast cancer have double the risk of mortality compared to women who do not develop contralateral breast cancer. We observed a small non-significant reduction in mortality for those who had bilateral mastectomies as initial treatment, but the cohort will require longer follow up for definitive results. Women with a BRCA1 mutation should be counselled on the risks of contralateral breast cancer and make surgical decisions with this knowledge. Citation Format: Kelly Metcalfe, Jan Lubinski, Jana Soukupová, Rinat Bernstein-Molho, Mina Lee, Evans Gareth, Arvids Irmejs, Robert Fruscio, Cynthia Villareal Garza, Joanne Ngeow, Jennifer Plichta, Rinat Yerushalmi, Steven Narod. Surgical Treatment of Women with Breast Cancer and a BRCA1 Mutation: An International Analysis of the Impact of Bilateral Mastectomy on Survival [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr GS02-04.

Abstract LB273: Pharmacological synthetic lethality by co-inhibition of PARP and HDAC enzymes

Abstract Introduction: Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) induces synthetic lethality in cells exhibiting defects in homologous repair (HR) pathways, such as BRCA1 and BRCA2-mutated breast or ovarian cancers, and 4 different PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are currently approved by the FDA. While HR-deficient cancers usually respond well to single agent PARPi, HR-proficient cancers are generally less sensitive to the treatment. Acquired resistance to PARPi due to activating mutations in BRCA genes are also not uncommon. In this work, we have examined strategies for enhancing PARPi activity in a HR-proficient context and identified histone deacetylases (HDACs) as targets for pharmacological synthetic lethality in the context of PARPi. Materials and methods: PARP1 and PARP2 activity were measured using Trevigen Universal Colorimetric PARP Assay Kit, BPS Bioscience PARP2 Colorimetric PARP2 Assay Kit, and PARylation assay. HDAC activity was measured using HeLa cell nuclear extracts and a fluorogenic peptide-based biochemical assay. Cell survival EC50 were determined using CellTiter Glo viability assay. Cell cycle analysis was performed by flow cytometry with propidium iodide staining. DNA damage was investigated by immunoblotting and immunofluorescence using gamma-H2AX antibodies, and comet assays for confirmation of double-strand breaks. Spheroid assays were performed using the Incucyte® S3 spheroid analysis module. In vivo metastasis formations were examined using the pulmonary metastasis assay (PuMA). Results and discussion: Combinations of PARP and HDAC inhibitors in HR-proficient tumor cells demonstrated that HDACi could enhance the efficacy of PARPi in vitro. This was associated with increased acute and sustained DNA-damage distinct cell cycle profiles showing activity in both S- and G2/M-phases. Importantly, dual single-molecule PARP-HDAC inhibitors showed potent inhibition of PARP1 and PARP2 activity and PAR synthesis, comparable to olaparib, as well as inhibition of HDAC with IC50 values in the low µM range. Dual PARP-HDAC inhibition decreased survival of HR-proficient cells in both 2D cultures and 3D spheroid assays with lower EC50 values than olaparib or vorinostat alone. Importantly, lung metastasis formation was significantly impaired by dual PARP-HDAC inhibition. Conclusion: Combination of PARP inhibition and HDAC inhibition showed increased efficacy compared to single agent PARP inhibition in HR-proficient cells. Development of bifunctional inhibitors may provide a novel therapeutic opportunity for tumors with limited response rates to single agent PARPi. Citation Format: Sarah Truong, Louise Ramos, Beibei Zhai, Fariba Ghaidi, Mona Marzban, Hans Adomat, Xiaoqi Chen, John Langlands, Dennis Brown, Jeffrey Bacha, Colin Collins, Poul H. Sorensen, Wang Shen, Mads Daugaard. Pharmacological synthetic lethality by co-inhibition of PARP and HDAC enzymes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr LB273.

BRCA2 Polymorphisms and Breast Cancer Susceptibility: a Multi-Tools Bioinformatics Approach.

The main focus of this investigation is to identify deleterious single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located in the BRCA2 gene through in silico approach, thereby,providing an understanding of potential consequences regarding the susceptibility to breast cancer. The GenomAD database was used to identify SNPs. To determine the potential adverse consequences, our study employed various prediction tools, including SIFT, PolyPhen, PredictSNP, SNAP2, PhD-SNP, and ClinVar. The pathogenicity associated with the deleterious snSNPs was evaluated bu MutPred and Fathmm. Additionally, I-Mutant and MuPro were used to assess the stability, followed by conservation and protein-protein interaction analysis using robust computational tools. The 3D structure of BRCA2 protein was generated by SwissModel, followed by validation using PROCHECK and Errat. The GenomAD database was used to identify a total of 7, 921 SNPs, including 1940 missense SNPs. A set of 69 SNPs predicted by consensus to be damaging across all platforms was identified. Mutpred and Fathmm identified 48 and 38 SNPs, respectively to be associated with cancer. While I- Mutant and MuPro assays suggested 22 SNPs to decrease protein stability. Additionally, these 22 SNPs reside within highly conserved regions of the BRCA2 protein. Domain analysis, utilizing InterPro, pinpointed 18 deleterious mutations within crucial DNA binding domains and one in the BRC repeat region. This study establishes a foundation for future experimental validations and the creation of breast cancer-targeted treatment approaches.

Abstract A050: CD8+ T cell exhaustion and their DNA damage in BRCA1 mutated TNBC

Abstract PARP Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are treatment options in TNBC patients with inherited BRCA1 mutations. Recent studies have shown that immune checkpoint therapies (ICT) in combination with PARPi are effective in other solid cancer types such as melanoma, pancreatic and BRCA deficient ovarian cancer. In early and advanced BRCA1 TNBC, ICT studies are limited and not fully elucidated especially for new ICT that target LAG-3, CTLA-4, ICOS. There is a need for identifying potential prognostic markers suggesting which patients could benefit most from ICT. Therefore, we conducted a detailed single cell analysis of the tumor microenvironment (TME) mainly focused on immune checkpoint expression, CD8 T cell exhaustion and DNA damage associated with BRCA1 TNBC compared to WT TNBC. Combining single cell spatial tissue multiplexing (PhenoCycler) (BRCA1 TNBC n=77, WT TNBC n=55), scRNA seq (BRCA2 n=1, WT n=5), FLOW (PBMCs: BRCA1 n=13, BRCA2 n=17, WT n=62) as well as bulk RNA seq (BRCA1 TNBC n=35, WT TNBC n=11), we performed a detailed analysis of the TME associated with BRCA1 and WT breast cancer. We developed a 32-plex antibody panel that evaluated T-cells and other immune cells with markers of exhaustion, DNA damage and immune checkpoint expression. CD8+ T cell frequency was significantly increased in BRCA1 TNBC compared to WT TNBC (p=0.0015). A detailed CD8 T cell characterization revealed increased dysfunctional/exhausted cells (e.g., TOX+/LAG-3+/PD-1+), T cell DNA damage (CD3e+/CD8+/RAD51+, p=0.0047) and LAG-3 transcript levels in BRCA1 TNBC compared to WT TNBC (p=0.0625). Furthermore, immune checkpoint protein expression in tumor- (PD-L1) and immune cells (PD-1, LAG-3, ICOS) was increased in the TME associated with BRCA1 TNBC compared to WT TNBC. Of note, we also found that PBMCs of healthy tumor-free BRCA mutation carriers contained significantly increased CD8+/PD+1 T cells compared to WT (p=0.012). Our data indicates that BRCA1 haploinsufficiency leads to DNA damaged and dysfunctional CD8+ T cells within the TME compared to WT. Thus, the TME of BRCA1 TNBC patients is more immune suppressive due to increased exhausted CD8+ T cell frequency, their DNA damage as well as immune checkpoint expression of both tumor-/and immune cells compared to WT TNBC. The effect of BRCA1 haploinsufficiency on immune cells is important to consider when trials of ICT options are designed. Citation Format: Dana Pueschl, Anupma Nayak, Derek A. Oldridge, William Chandler, Bria Fulmer, Sokratis Apostolidis, Danielle Bragen, Bradley Wubbenhorst, John Pluta, kConFab Investigator, Antonis Antoniou, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, E. John Wherry, Susan M. Domchek, Katherine L. Nathanson. CD8+ T cell exhaustion and their DNA damage in BRCA1 mutated TNBC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Breast Cancer Research; 2023 Oct 19-22; San Diego, California. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(3 Suppl_1):Abstract nr A050.

CRISPR-Cas12a based target recognition initiated duplex-specific nuclease enhanced fluorescence and colorimetric analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA)

The significant role of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) for disease diagnosis, including cancer, has garnered a lot of attention. The challenges of creating target-specific primers and the possibility of false-positive signals make amplification-based detection methods problematic. Fluorescent biosensors based on CRISPR-Cas have been widely established, however they still require an amplification step before they can be used for detection. To detect cfDNA, researchers have created a CRISPR-Cas12a-based nucleic acid amplification-free fluorescent biosensor that uses a combination of fluorescence and colorimetric signaling improved by duplex-specific nuclease (DSN). DSN-assisted signal recycling is initiated in H1@MBs when the target cfDNA activates the CRISPR-Cas12a complex, leading to the degradation of single-strand DNA (ssDNA) sequences. This method has an extremely high detection limit for the BRCA-1 breast cancer gene. In addition to measuring viral DNA in a field-deployable and point-of-care testing (POCT) platform, this fast and highly selective sensor can be used to evaluate additional nucleic acid biomarkers.

Longitudinal profiling identifies co-occurring BRCA1/2 reversions, TP53BP1, RIF1 and PAXIP1 mutations in PARP inhibitor-resistant advanced breast cancer

Resistance to therapies that target homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in breast cancer limits their overall effectiveness. Multiple, preclinically validated, mechanisms of resistance have been proposed, but their existence and relative frequency in clinical disease are unclear, as is how to target resistance. Longitudinal mutation and methylation profiling of circulating tumour (ct)DNA was carried out in 47 patients with metastatic BRCA1-, BRCA2- or PALB2-mutant breast cancer treated with HRD-targeted therapy who developed progressive disease-18 patients had primary resistance and 29 exhibited response followed by resistance. ctDNA isolated at multiple time points in the patient treatment course (before, on-treatment and at progression) was sequenced using a novel >750-gene intron/exon targeted sequencing panel. Where available, matched tumour biopsies were whole exome and RNA sequenced and also used to assess nuclear RAD51. BRCA1/2 reversion mutations were present in 60% of patients and were the most prevalent form of resistance. In 10 cases, reversions were detected in ctDNA before clinical progression. Two new reversion-based mechanisms were identified: (i) intragenic BRCA1/2 deletions with intronic breakpoints; and (ii) intragenic BRCA1/2 secondary mutations that formed novel splice acceptor sites, the latter being confirmed by invitro minigene reporter assays. When seen before commencing subsequent treatment, reversions were associated with significantly shorter time to progression. Tumours with reversions retained HRD mutational signatures but had functional homologous recombination based on RAD51 status. Although less frequent than reversions, nonreversion mechanisms [loss-of-function (LoF) mutations in TP53BP1, RIF1 or PAXIP1] were evident in patients with acquired resistance and occasionally coexisted with reversions, challenging the notion that singular resistance mechanisms emerge in each patient. These observations map the prevalence of candidate drivers of resistance across time in a clinical setting, information with implications for clinical management and trial design in HRD breast cancers.

ATRX is a predictive marker for endocrinotherapy and chemotherapy resistance in HER2-/HR+ breast cancer through the regulation of the AR, GLI3 and GATA2 transcriptional network.

Drug resistance in breast cancer (BC) is a clinical challenge. Exploring the mechanism and identifying a precise predictive biomarker for the drug resistance in BC is critical. Three first-line drug (paclitaxel, doxorubicin and tamoxifen) resistance datasets in BC from GEO were merged to obtain 1,461 differentially expressed genes for weighted correlation network analysis, resulting in identifying ATRX as the hub gene. ATRX is a chromatin remodelling protein, therefore, ATRX-associated transcription factors were explored, thereby identifying the network of AR, GLI3 and GATA2. GO and KEGG analyses revealed immunity, transcriptional regulation and endocrinotherapy/chemotherapy resistance were enriched. Moreover, CIBERSORT revealed immunity regulation was inhibited in the resistance group. ssGSEA showed a significantly lower immune status in the ATRX-Low group compared to the ATRX-High group. Furthermore, the peaks of H3K9me3 ChIP-seq on the four genes were higher in normal tissues than in BC tissues. Notably, the frequency of ATRX mutation was higher than BRCA in BC. Moreover, depressed ATRX revealed worse overall survival and disease-free survival in the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-/hormone receptor (HR)+ BC. Additionally, depressed ATRX predicted poor results for patients who underwent endocrinotherapy or chemotherapy in the HER2-/HR+ BC subgroup. A nomogram based on ATRX, TILs and ER exhibited a significantly accurate survival prediction ability. Importantly, overexpression of ATRX significantly inhibited the IC50 of the three first-line drugs on MCF-7 cell. Thus, ATRX is an efficient predictive biomarker for endocrinotherapy and chemotherapy resistance in HER2-/HR+ BC and acts by suppressing the AR, GLI3 and GATA2 transcriptional network.

Recontact to return new or updated PALB2 genetic results in the clinical laboratory setting.

The purpose of this study was to recontact individuals with clinically actionable test results identified through a retrospective research study and to provide a framework for laboratories to recontact patients. Genetic testing was conducted on 2977 individuals originally referred for BRCA1 and BRCA2 hereditary breast and ovarian cancer testing that had a negative genetic test result. A gene panel was used to identify pathogenic variants in known or newly discovered genes that could explain the underlying cause of disease; however, analysis was restricted to PALB2 for the purposes of this study. A patient recontact decision tree was developed to assist in the returning of updated genetic test results to clinics and patients. Novel clinically actionable pathogenic variants were identified in the PALB2 gene in 18 participants (0.6%), the majority of whom were recontacted with their new or updated genetic test results. Eight individuals were unable to be recontacted; five individuals had already learnt about their new or updated findings from genetic testing outside the context of this study; three individuals prompted cascade testing in family members; two individuals were deceased. Novel pathogenic variants in PALB2 were identified in 18 individuals through retrospective gene panel testing. Recontacting these individuals regarding these new or updated findings had a range of outcomes. The process of conveying genomic results within this framework can be effectively accomplished while upholding patient autonomy, potentially leading to advantageous outcomes for patients and their families.

Comparing Prognosis for BRCA1, BRCA2, and Non-BRCA Breast Cancer

Background: Germline pathogenic variants (PV) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, which account for 20% of familial breast cancer (BC) cases, are highly penetrant and are associated with Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Previous studies, mostly including higher numbers of BRCA1 BC patients, yielded conflicting results regarding BRCA1/2 BC outcomes. In the Portuguese population, BRCA2 BC is diagnosed more frequently than BRCA1 BC. We aimed to compare clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis between BC patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and a control group without germline PV (BRCA-wt). Furthermore, we explored the frequency and outcomes of risk-reducing surgeries in BRCA-mutated patients. Methods: Prospective follow-up was proposed for patients with a diagnosed BRCA1/2 PV. For this study, a matched control group (by age at diagnosis, by decade, and by stage at diagnosis) included BC patients without germline PV. We compared overall survival (OS) and invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) within the three groups, and the use of risk-reducing surgeries among the BRCA cohort. Results: For a mean follow-up time of 113.0 months, BRCA-wt patients showed longer time to recurrence (p = 0.002) and longer OS (p < 0.001). Among patients with BRCA mutations, no statistical differences were found, although patients with BRCA2 BC had longer iDFS and OS. Uptake of risk-reducing surgeries (contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy) were negative predictors of invasive disease and death, respectively. Conclusions: Testing positive for a BRCA PV is associated with a higher risk of relapse and death in patients with BC in the Portuguese population. Risk-reducing mastectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy were associated with lower incidence of relapse and longer median iDFS and OS, respectively.

Prophylactic Salpingo-Oophorectomy and Survival After BRCA1/2 Breast Cancer Resection

Few studies have investigated whether prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy (PSO) for patients with previously resected breast cancer who carry pathogenic germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 variants is associated with a reduced risk of cancer-specific death. To assess the association of PSO and prophylactic mastectomy (PM) with prognosis after quadrantectomy or mastectomy as primary treatment for patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 breast cancer. This retrospective cohort study was performed in a single-institution, tertiary referral center. Consecutive patients with invasive breast cancer treated surgically between 1972 and 2019 were recruited and followed up prospectively after they were found to carry the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene variant. The data analysis was performed between April 2022 and July 2023. Following breast surgery, some patients underwent PSO, PM, or both, whereas others did not. The primary study end point was overall survival as measured by the Kaplan-Meier method. Secondary end points were crude cumulative incidence of breast cancer-specific mortality, ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), contralateral breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and ovarian cancer-specific mortality. Of 480 patients included in the cohort (median age at initial surgery, 40.0 years; IQR, 34.0-46.0 years), PSO was associated with a significantly reduced risk of death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.40; 95% CI, 0.25-0.64; P < .001). This reduction was most evident for patients carrying the BRCA1 variant (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.20-0.63; P = .001), those with triple-negative disease (HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.09-0.46; P = .002), and those with invasive ductal carcinoma (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.31-0.84; P = .008). Prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy was not associated with risk of contralateral breast cancer or IBTR. Initial or delayed PM was associated with a reduced risk of IBTR but not with overall survival or breast cancer-specific mortality. The study findings suggest that PSO should be offered to all patients with BRCA1/2 breast cancer who undergo surgery with curative intent to reduce risk of death. In particular, PSO should be offered to patients with the BRCA1 variant at the time of breast surgery.

High-dose alkylating chemotherapy in BRCA-altered triple-negative breast cancer: the randomized phase III NeoTN trial

Exploratory analyses of high-dose alkylating chemotherapy trials have suggested that BRCA1 or BRCA2-pathway altered (BRCA-altered) breast cancer might be particularly sensitive to this type of treatment. In this study, patients with BRCA-altered tumors who had received three initial courses of dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (ddAC), were randomized between a fourth ddAC course followed by high-dose carboplatin-thiotepa-cyclophosphamide or conventional chemotherapy (initially ddAC only or ddAC-capecitabine/decetaxel [CD] depending on MRI response, after amendment ddAC-carboplatin/paclitaxel [CP] for everyone). The primary endpoint was the neoadjuvant response index (NRI). Secondary endpoints included recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). In total, 122 patients were randomized. No difference in NRI-score distribution (p = 0.41) was found. A statistically non-significant RFS difference was found (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.23–1.25; p = 0.15). Exploratory RFS analyses showed benefit in stage III (n = 35; HR 0.16; 95% CI 0.03–0.75), but not stage II (n = 86; HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.30–3.30) patients. For stage III, 4-year RFS was 46% (95% CI 24–87%), 71% (95% CI 48–100%) and 88% (95% CI 74–100%), for ddAC/ddAC-CD, ddAC-CP and high-dose chemotherapy, respectively. No significant differences were found between high-dose and conventional chemotherapy in stage II-III, triple-negative, BRCA-altered breast cancer patients. Further research is needed to establish if there are patients with stage III, triple negative BRCA-altered breast cancer for whom outcomes can be improved with high-dose alkylating chemotherapy or whether the current standard neoadjuvant therapy including carboplatin and an immune checkpoint inhibitor is sufficient. Trial Registration: NCT01057069.

Barriers to gBRCA Testing in High-Risk HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer.

Despite the OlympiA trial demonstrating that early-stage, high-risk, HER2- germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation (gBRCAm) positive breast cancer patients can benefit from PARPi in the adjuvant setting, the gBRCA testing rate in early-stage HR+/HER2- patients remains suboptimal compared to that in early-stage TNBC patients. To better understand the perceived barriers associated with gBRCA testing in HR+/HER2- disease, a quantitative survey was conducted across stakeholders (n = 430) including medical oncologists, surgeons, nurses, physician assistants, payers, and patients. This study revealed that while payers claim to cover gBRCA testing, poor clinician documentation and overutilization are key challenges. Therefore, payers place utilization management controls on gBRCA testing due to their impression that clinicians overtest. These controls have led to healthcare professionals experiencing payer pushback in the form of reimbursement limitations and denials. The perceived challenges to gBRCA testing stem from the lack of consensus dictating which patients are high risk and should be tested. While payers define high risk based on the CPS + EG score from the OlympiA trial, HCPs adopt a broader definition including genomic risk scores, lymph node involvement, and tumor grade and size. A dialogue to harmonize risk classification and testing eligibility across stakeholders is critical to address this disconnect and increase gBRCA testing in appropriate patients.

Intrinsic disorder may drive the interaction of PROS1 and MERTK in uveal melanoma

BackgroundClass 2 uveal melanomas are associated with the inactivation of the BRCA1 ((breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein)-associated protein 1 (BAP1)) gene. Inactivation of BAP1 promotes the upregulation of vitamin K-dependent protein S (PROS1), which interacts with the tyrosine-protein kinase Mer (MERTK) receptor on M2 macrophages to induce an immunosuppressive environment. MethodsWe simulated the interaction of PROS1 with MERTK with ColabFold. We evaluated PROS1 and MERTK for the presence of intrinsically disordered protein regions (IDPRs) and disorder-to-order (DOT) regions to understand their protein-protein interaction (PPI). We first evaluated the structure of each protein with AlphaFold. We then analyzed specific sequence-based features of the PROS1 and MERTK with a suite of bioinformatics tools. ResultsWith high-resolution, moderate confidence, we successfully modeled the interaction between PROS1 and MERTK (predicted local distance difference test score (pDLLT) = 70.68). Our structural analysis qualitatively demonstrated IDPRs (i.e., spaghetti-like entities) in PROS1 and MERK. PROS1 was 23.37 % disordered, and MERTK was 23.09 % disordered, classifying them as moderately disordered and flexible proteins. PROS1 was significantly enriched in cysteine, the most order-promoting residue (p-value <0.05). Our IUPred analysis demonstrated that there are two disorder-to-order transition (DOT) regions in PROS1. MERTK was significantly enriched in proline, the most disorder-promoting residue (p-value <0.05), but did not contain DOT regions. Our STRING analysis demonstrated that the PPI network between PROS1 and MERTK is more complex than their assumed one-to-one binding (p-value <2.0 × 10−6). ConclusionOur findings present a novel prediction for the interaction between PROS1 and MERTK. Our findings show that PROS1 and MERTK contain elements of intrinsic disorder. PROS1 has two DOT regions that are attractive immunotherapy targets. We recommend that IDPRs and DOT regions found in PROS1 and MERTK should be considered when developing immunotherapies targeting this PPI.

Non-BRCA1/BRCA2 high-risk familial breast cancers are not associated with a high prevalence of BRCAness

BackgroundFamilial breast cancer is in most cases unexplained due to the lack of identifiable pathogenic variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. The somatic mutational landscape and in particular the extent of BRCA-like tumour features (BRCAness) in these familial breast cancers where germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations have not been identified is to a large extent unknown.MethodsWe performed whole-genome sequencing on matched tumour and normal samples from high-risk non-BRCA1/BRCA2 breast cancer families to understand the germline and somatic mutational landscape and mutational signatures. We measured BRCAness using HRDetect. As a comparator, we also analysed samples from BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutation carriers.ResultsWe noted for non-BRCA1/BRCA2 tumours, only a small proportion displayed high HRDetect scores and were characterized by concomitant promoter hypermethylation or in one case a RAD51D splice variant previously reported as having unknown significance to potentially explain their BRCAness. Another small proportion showed no features of BRCAness but had mutationally active tumours. The remaining tumours lacked features of BRCAness and were mutationally quiescent.ConclusionsA limited fraction of high-risk familial non-BRCA1/BRCA2 breast cancer patients is expected to benefit from treatment strategies against homologue repair deficient cancer cells.

A population-based study of BRCA breast cancer incidence and prognosis in the Italian Emilia Romagna region: The MUTina study.

10616 Background: In Italy, about 3% of all breast cancer (BC) are related to BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations. In the Emilia Romagna Region, a unique hub and spoke model was adopted for select and follow people at risk, starting from the Regional Screening Programs, General Practioners and specialists, covering all the area. This study was designed to uniformly identify and treat BRCA1/2 related BC. Characteristics and outcome of tumors detected by this protocol will be presented. Methods: In this multicenter-retrospective study, seven out of nine provinces collected data about BRCA-related BC identified in the Emilia-Romagna region. Patients and tumors characteristics, surgical information, treatment modalities for early (neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapies) and advanced disease, type of relapse (local/distant), second primary tumors occurrence, surgical preventive strategies (bilateral mastectomy, oophorectomy), gene testing data, disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were registered. Comparisons between BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumors were performed. Results: Since 2000 to 2011, 284 BC were registered (171 BRCA1, 110 BRCA2 and 3 BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutated) with a median age at onset of 42 years. BRCA1-related tumors were mostly triple negative BC (TNBC) compared to BRCA2 ones. The diagnosis was at stage I in 52.3% of cases, being 59.7% BRCA1 and 39% BRCA2 (P = 0.0015). BRCA2 patients, compared to BRCA1, received more frequent up-front surgery (85% vs. 74.9%, P = 0.049) and less chemotherapy (34.1% vs 65.9%, P = 0.004). After a median 12-years follow-up period, 136 patients (47,9%) developed an ipsilateral/local or systemic recurrence or contralateral second BC. BRCA1 developed more local recurrences, compared to BRCA2 that had more distant relapses (P = 0.013). Median OS was not reached in the whole population, with 80.3% of patients alive at the analysis cut-off. Among the two populations, there was a benefit trend for BRCA1 patients (P = 0.071), mostly for those who received chemotherapy (P = 0.0036), contralateral mastectomy (P = 0.0001) and oophorectomy (P &lt; 0.0001). Finally, 25.7% of patients developed a second tumor, excluding BC, mostly ovarian cancer. Conclusions: Although BRCA1-related BCs show more aggressive characteristics than BRCA2 BC, the early diagnosis due to our regional surveillance program, leads to a trend for better outcome, even if not statistically significant. The BRCA1 highest rate of recurrence reflects the tendency to local rather than distant relapse. Furthermore, the BRCA deficiency appears to be a predictor of chemosensitivity. Finally bilateral mastectomy and oophorectomy seem to be associated to better outcome. In conclusions, our data support the using of an intensive screening associated to maximal surgery and chemotherapy when BC arises in BRCA carriers, to overcome the unfavorable tumors characteristics of these patients.

Vitamin D and Calcium Supplement Use and High-Risk Breast Cancer: A Case-Control Study among BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers.

The role of vitamin D and calcium use in the development of breast cancer among women in the general population is not clear. Furthermore, whether vitamin D and calcium supplement use are associated with breast cancer in high-risk populations has not been evaluated. Thus, we evaluated the association between vitamin D and/or calcium supplement use and breast cancer among women with a pathogenic variant (mutation) in BRCA1 or BRCA2. BRCA mutation carriers enrolled in a longitudinal study were invited to complete a supplemental questionnaire on lifetime supplement use. Cases included women with a prevalent diagnosis of invasive breast cancer, and controls had no history of breast cancer. Vitamin D and calcium use were categorized as never/ever use, and as tertiles of supplement intake (total average daily supplement use). Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of breast cancer. This study included 134 breast cancer cases and 276 controls. Women who used vitamin D-containing supplements had 46% lower odds of having breast cancer compared to those who never used supplements (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.31, 0.91; p = 0.02). Increasing vitamin D and calcium supplement intake was inversely associated with the odds of having breast cancer (p-trend = 0.04). Findings were suggestively stronger among BRCA1 mutation carriers; however, analyses were limited by small strata. These findings suggest a potential inverse association between vitamin D and calcium supplementation and BRCA breast cancer. Additional studies are warranted to confirm these findings and accurately inform clinical care guidelines.