Branch Vessel Occlusion Research Articles

Extra-anatomic revascularization and a new cannulation strategy for preoperative cerebral malperfusion due to severe stenosis or occlusion of supra-aortic branch vessels in acute type A aortic dissection

ObjectivesAcute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) with severe stenosis or occlusion of the true lumen of aortic arch branch vessels often leads to an increased incidence of severe postsurgical neurological complications and mortality rate. In this study, we aimed to introduce our institutional extra-anatomic revascularization and cannulation strategy with improved postoperative outcomes for better management of patients with cerebral malperfusion in the setting of ATAAD. MethodsTwenty-eight patients with ATAAD complicated by severe stenosis or occlusion of the aortic arch branch vessels, as noted on combined computed tomography angiography of the aorta and craniocervical artery, between January 2021 and June 2022 were included in this study. Basic patient characteristics, surgical procedures, hospitalization stays, and early follow-up results were analyzed. ResultsThe median follow-up duration was 16.5 months (interquartile range: 11.5–20.5), with a 100% completion rate. The 30-day mortality rates was 7.1% (2/28 patients); two patients had multiple cerebral infarctions on preoperative computed tomography and persistent coma. Postoperative transient neurological dysfunction occurred in 10.7% (3/28) of the patients, and no new permanent neurological dysfunction occurred. Of all the patients, 3.6% (1/28) had novel acute renal failure. No other deaths, secondary surgeries, or serious complications occurred during the early follow-up period. ConclusionsUse of extra-anatomic revascularization and a new cannulation strategy before cardiopulmonary bypass is safe and feasible and may reduce the high incidence of postoperative neurological complications in patients with ATAAD and cerebral malperfusion.

PCONUS 2 and pCONUS 2-HPC in the treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: Multicentre UK experience.

pCONUS 2 and pCONUS 2-HPC are neck-bridging devices that provide coiling support in the endovascular treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms. To date, limited multicentre data has been published. This study provides the first pooled data from multiple UK centres regarding outcomes for these devices covering the periprocedural period to 6-month follow-up. This retrospective, single-arm study assessed 65 patients treated over 3 years from the time of procedure to 6 months post-procedure across four UK centres. Data collected included patient demographics, aneurysm characteristics and antiplatelet regimens. Outcome measures were angiographic results and procedure-related complications from the immediate periprocedural period to 6-month follow-up. Fifty-four unruptured (83.1%) and 11 ruptured (16.9%) aneurysms were treated. Fifty-five aneurysms were located in the anterior circulation (87.7%). There were four device-related intraprocedural complications: three cases of asymptomatic, temporary thrombus formation and one mortality associated with branch vessel occlusion and aneurysm re-bleeding in a ruptured case. There were no post-procedural device-related complications. Satisfactory occlusion was achieved in 58/65 procedures (89.2%) at time of treatment and in 44/60 (73.3%) at 6 months. Satisfactory occlusion correlated with aneurysm size and coiling packing density. Retreatment was required for five unruptured cases (7.7%) and was straightforward with the device in situ. pCONUS 2 and pCONUS 2-HPC have good short-term safety profiles. The use of pCONUS 2-HPC in the acute treatment of ruptured aneurysms with postprocedural SAPT is feasible. The devices have an intraprocedural complication rate of 4/65 (6.2%) across multiple UK centres, including a single death (1.5%).

Outcome comparison between LSA complete reconstruction and partial coverage with endovascular technique for patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection

Objectives: To compare the short-term outcomes of branched stentgrafts for left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization or partial LSA coverage without reconstruction in the treatment of type B aortic dissection with proximal tear close to LSA. Methods: A total of 125 type B aortic dissection patients were treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in Xinqiao Hospital of the Army Medical University from January 2019 to March 2021. Their medical records were reviewed and the outcomes were followed up. According to the different treatment methodologies, the patients were divided into complete LSA coverage with reconstruction group (n=25) and partial LSA coverage without reconstruction group (n=100). The data of baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, and incidence of postoperative in-hospital adverse events were collected and compared between the two groups. The adverse events during one-year follow-up were also compared between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to compare the cumulative survival rates between groups. Results: Compared with partial LSA coverage group, distance of proximal tear to LSA((8.69±2.32)mm vs. (13.77±1.71) mm) was shorter, in-hospital expenses[175 400(166 000-189 900) yuan vs. 143 700 (138 100-151 800) yuan] was higher, average length of stent [200.00 mm vs. 150.00 (150.00-150.00) mm] and operation time [155.00 (140.00-170.00) min vs. 95.00 (80.00-100.00) min] were longer, and volumes of contrast agent [300.00 (200.00-300.00) ml vs. 200.00 (200.00-300.00) ml] (P<0.05) were higher for patients in the complete LSA coverage with reconstruction group. The incidence of post-operative fever was significantly higher in complete LSA coverage with revascularization group than that in partial LSA partial coverage with reconstruction group (56% vs. 25%, P=0.003). There was no significant difference in the incidences of all-cause death, stroke, endoleak, paraplegia, and LSA branch vessel occlusion between the two groups during follow-up. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the cumulative survival rates between the two groups (log-rank test: P=0.572 5). Conclusion: The TEVAR with complete LSA revascularization or partial LSA coverage without reconstruction for type B aortic dissection close to LSA are safe and effective with high success rates. There is no significant difference between these two techniques in short-term outcomes.

Microcatheter-Assisted Protection of the Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery During Parent Artery Sacrifice of a Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm.

Branch vessel occlusion is a major cause of stroke in parent artery sacrifice (PAS) for vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms (VADA). There is now an increasing trend towards preservation of branch vessels during PAS. Stents are commonly employed to achieve this but bring with it the attendant risks of future thrombosis and lifelong antiplatelet use. Although a microcatheter protection technique has been utilised in branch artery protection of wide-necked saccular aneurysms, it has rarely been described in PAS for VADAs. We describe the use of a dual microcatheter technique in the protection and remodelling of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) during PAS of the vertebral artery, which also served as a temporary scaffold to support placement of the coils during the embolisation process.

Hemodynamic Parameters Predict In-stent Thrombosis After Multibranched Endovascular Repair of Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Retrospective Study of Branched Stent-Graft Thrombosis.

Background: Branch vessel occlusion is reported in endovascular repair of aortic pathology. This study aimed to evaluate the hemodynamic indicators associated with in-stent thrombosis (IST) of a branched stent-graft (BSG) after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) of a complex abdominal aortic aneurysm.Methods: A retrospective evaluation was performed based on the computed tomography (CT) scans and clinical data of three patients who underwent multi-branched endovascular repair. Patient-specific 3-dimensional models were reconstructed, and hemodynamic analysis was performed for IST. Hemodynamics-related parameters including time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), oscillatory shear stress index (OSI), and relative residence time (RRT) were compared among the individual patients.Results: The flow velocity, TAWSS, OSI, and RRT were radically changed in the area of the IST. In BSGs, IST tended to occur in the regions of hemodynamic alteration near the bends in the device, where a decreased flow velocity (<0.6 m/s) and TAWSS (<0.8 Pa) and an elevated OSI (>0.2) and RRT (>5 s) were consistently observed.Conclusions: Hemodynamic perturbations in BSGs cause a predisposition to IST, which can be predicted by a series of changes in the flow parameters. Early hemodynamic analysis might be useful for identifying and remediating IST after multibranched endovascular repair.

Delayed Occlusion of the Anterior Choroidal Artery Following Flow Diverter Stent Deployment for Unruptured Aneurysm: A Case Report and Literature Review

Flow diverter stent has been a promising device for intracranial aneurysm treatment. For treating aneurysms located in the anterior circulation, critical branches may be covered by flow diverter stent. The occlusion incidence of these branches has been reported, and even if branch vessel occlusions occur, associated neurological deficits are extremely rare. We present a 55-year-old woman who had a large saccular aneurysm at the right internal carotid artery (ICA). A developed fetal-type posterior communicating artery (PCOM) originated from the sac. We administered flow diverter stent deployment with coil insertion following surgical anastomosis of the superficial temporal artery to the posterior cerebral artery (STA-PCA) with ligation of the origin of the PCOM. On the seventh morning following the intervention, ischemic complication developed due to anterior choroidal artery occlusion jailed by the flow diverter stent. The occlusion of anterior choroidal artery covered by flow diverter stent is extremely rare. However, if the branch arises from the aneurysm sac, occlusion can transpire and induce serious complication. The most probable cause of occlusion in this case was that the orifice was jailed apart from the stent strut because the branch originated from the sac rather than the neck. Furthermore, the progression rate of intra-aneurysm thrombus formation is also an important factor affecting the side branch occlusion.

Strategies to improve outcomes for acute type A aortic dissection with cerebral malperfusion.

We aimed to identify predictors of postoperative permanent neurological deficits (PNDs) and evaluate the early management of cerebral perfusion in patients undergoing surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection with cerebral malperfusion. Between October 2009 and September 2018, a total of 197 patients with acute type A aortic dissection underwent aortic replacement. Of these, 42 (21.3%) patients had an imaging cerebral malperfusion (ICM). ICM was assessed preoperatively, which also revealed whether dissected supra-aortic branch vessels were occluded or narrowed by a thrombosed false lumen. After September 2017, early reperfusion and extra-anatomic revascularization were performed in cases with ICM. Hospital mortality rates for cases with ICM were 4.8% (2/42). Before September 2017, PND were observed in 6 patients (54.5%) with preoperative neurological symptoms (n = 11), and 7 patients (33.3%) without neurological symptoms (n = 21) in patients with ICM. Occlusion or severe stenosis of supra-aortic branch vessels (odds ratio, 7.66; P < 0.001), regardless of preoperative clinical neurological symptoms, was a risk factor for PND. After September 2017, 7 of 10 patients with ICM underwent early reperfusion and extra-anatomic revascularization. PND did not occur in any of these 7 patients. Occlusion or severe stenosis of supra-aortic branch vessels is a predictor of PND risk in patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. Early reperfusion and extra-anatomic revascularization may reduce the risk of neurological complications in patients with ICM, with or without neurological symptoms.

Branch Vessel Patency after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type B Aortic Dissection

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissections is used to promote false lumen (FL) thrombosis and favorable aortic remodeling, but its impact on occlusion of FL origin branch vessels has not been widely described. We compare FL versus true lumen (TL) branch vessel patency after TEVAR. Patients treated by TEVAR for type B aortic dissection in zones 2-5 in the Vascular Quality Initiative from 2009 to 2018 were evaluated. The primary outcome was postoperative branch patency. Secondary outcomes were need for branch vessel intervention, preoperative origin, and postoperative patency of individual branch vessels (celiac, superior mesenteric artery, renal arteries, and iliac arteries). A subset analysis was performed comparing acute and chronic dissections. Of 11,774 patients, 1,484 met criteria for analysis. The left renal was the most common to have FL origin (21.6%), whereas right and left common iliac arteries were the most likely to originate off both lumens (BLs; 22% and 24%). Branch vessels that originated from the TL, FL, BLs, or were obstructed had postoperative patency rates of 99%, 99%, 99%, and 87% (P<0.0001). Branch vessel treatment was performed in 5% of patients. The right (2.5%) and left (2.8%) renal arteries were the most frequently obstructed branches postoperatively. On multivariate analysis, preoperatively obstructed branches (odds ratio 0.03, P<0.0001) were negatively associated with postoperative branch patency and branch vessel treatment (odds ratio 3.8, P=0.004) was positively associated with postoperative patency. FL or BL origin, number of zones covered by TEVAR, urgency, dissection chronicity (acute versus chronic), and demographics were not independently associated with patency. These findings remained unchanged in the subset analysis of only acute dissections. Branch vessel patency rates after TEVAR for a type B aortic dissection are high and are not significantly different for FL or BL origin vessels compared with TL vessels. Branches that are patent before TEVAR almost always remain patent after TEVAR, but branch vessel stenting may be required in less than 5%.

Branch Vessel Patency After TEVAR for Type B Aortic Dissection

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissections (TEVAR-AD) is used to promote false lumen (FL) thrombosis and favorable aortic remodeling, but it may lead to occlusion of FL origin branch vessels. We compare FL vs. true lumen (TL) branch vessel patency after TEVAR-AD.

Branch vessel occlusion in aneurysm treatment with flow diverter stent.

Flow diverter placement for treatment of intracranial aneurysms gained growing consensus in the past years. A major concern among professionals is the side branch coverage which leads in some cases to vessel occlusion. However, the lost vessel patency only infrequently is accompanied by a new onset of neurological deficits secondary to ischaemic lesions. A retrospective analysis of all patients treated with flow diversion at our hospital was aimed to better understand this phenomenon in order to formulate a hypothesis about the causes. We concluded that vessel occlusion occurs due to a reduced blood pressure gradient in those vessels with a strong collateral or anastomotic vascularization that refurnishes the same distal vascular territories. Indeed, we detected no new brain infarction since blood flow was always guaranteed.

Multibranched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in patients with and without chronic aortic dissections

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to compare multibranched endovascular aneurysm repair (MBEVAR) of postdissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) and pararenal aortic aneurysms (PRAAs) with MBEVAR of degenerative TAAAs and PRAAs and to assess the role played by the preoperative correction of potential complicating factors, such as true lumen compression and false lumen origin of vital branches, using adjunctive maneuvers. MethodsFrom July 2005 to July 2017, there were 162 patients who underwent elective MBEVAR of TAAAs and PRAAs. Data on demographics, procedural details, and outcomes were collected prospectively. ResultsThe mean age was 73 ± 8 years, and 119 of 162 (74%) were men; 19 of 162 (12%) had prior aortic dissections. Patients with dissections were younger (65 ± 11 years vs 74 ± 7 years; P = .002) and were less likely to have smoked (13/19 [68%] vs 135/143 [94%]; P = .002) or to have peripheral artery disease (0/19 [0%] vs 35/143 [24%]; P = .01) compared with those without dissections. Patients with prior dissections were more likely to have Crawford type II (10/19 [53%] vs 22/143 [15%]; P = .001) and type III (6/19 [32%] vs 16/143 [11%]; P = .03) TAAAs and were more likely to require at least one pre-MBEVAR adjunctive procedure (14/19 [74%] vs 55/143 [38%]; P = .006) compared with those without dissection. There was no difference in perioperative death, stroke, or paraplegia rates between the two groups. Median follow-up was 2.4 years (interquartile range, 0.8-4.7) and did not differ significantly between the two groups. There were no significant differences in branch vessel occlusion, endoleak rate, or aneurysm-related death between the two groups. ConclusionsPatients with chronic type B aortic dissection are more likely to have extensive aneurysms and more likely to require adjunctive procedures to provide the appropriate anatomic substrate for MBEVAR, but this does not appear to affect the conduct of MBEVAR or its outcomes.

Complete Occlusion of Aortic Arch Branch Vessels Diagnosed by Intraoperative Point-of-Care Ultrasonography: A Case Report

Complete Occlusion of Aortic Arch Branch Vessels Diagnosed by Intraoperative Point-of-Care Ultrasonography: A Case Report

The Role of Collateral Circulation in Branch Vessel Occlusion After Flow Diversion

Flow diversion for treatment of intracranial aneurysms frequently necessitates covering adjacent branch vessels. Although branch vessel occlusion is common, associated clinical deficits are rare. It has been hypothesized that clinically silent branch vessel occlusion is due to underlying collateral circulation. To study the role of collateral circulation in covered branch vessel occlusion, we assessed collateral vessels and altered branch vessel flow on transfemoral catheter angiography in patients undergoing flow diversion of intracranial aneurysms. Angiograms obtained before treatment, immediately after treatment, and during follow-up were evaluated for branch vessel flow patterns and associated collateral circulation in a consecutive retrospective cohort of 84 patients from 2011 to 2017 with branch vessel coverage related to aneurysm flow diversion using the Pipeline embolization device. We identified 142 branch vessels covered by the Pipeline device construct for treatment of 89 aneurysms, predominately in the anterior circulation (>90%). Collateral circulation was observed in approximately one third of these vessels and was associated with diminished (P < 0.001) or absent (P < 0.001) flow on follow-up angiography. Only 2 of 80 terminal branch vessels (no collaterals) were occluded, and these occurred in a patient with Pipeline device construct thrombosis. Altered branch vessel flow was not associated with vascular risk factors, treatment technique, or outcome measures, including new or worsening neurologic deficit. Altered flow in branch vessels covered during flow diversion reflects underlying collateral circulation and is not associated with downstream ischemic deficits.

Pipeline Diameter Significantly Impacts the Long-Term Fate of Jailed Side Branches during Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms.

Although covered side branches typically remain patent acutely following Pipeline Embolization Device embolization of intracranial aneurysms, the long-term fate of these vessels remains uncertain. We therefore elected to investigate factors that may influence the long-term patency of these covered side branches. We retrospectively evaluated the long-term patency of side branches covered by the Pipeline Embolization Device at our institution during treatment of intracranial aneurysms with at least 6 months of conventional angiography follow-up. Procedural and anatomic factors that might influence the fate of covered side branches were explored. One hundred forty-eight Pipeline Embolization Device treatments in 137 patients met the inclusion criteria. In 217 covered side branches, 29 (13.4%) were occluded on follow-up, and 40 (18.4%) were stenotic. All stenoses and occlusions were asymptomatic. In the entire cohort and in the largest subset of ophthalmic arteries, a smaller Pipeline Embolization Device diameter was associated with branch vessel occlusion (P = .001, P = .013). When we considered stenotic and occluded side branches together, smaller Pipeline Embolization Device size (P = .029) and administration of intraprocedural abciximab (P = .03) predicted side branch stenosis/occlusion, while anterior choroidal branch type (P = .003) was a predictor of gross side branch patency. A smaller Pipeline Embolization Device diameter is associated with delayed side branch stenosis/occlusion following Pipeline Embolization Device treatment, likely due to the higher metal density of smaller caliber devices. Although hemodynamic factors, including the potential for collateral flow, are still paramount in determining the fate of covered side branches, the amount of metal coverage at the side branch orifice also plays an important role.

Dissected Aorta Repair Through Stent Implantation trial: Canadian results

ObjectivesWe describe the Canadian results of the Ascyrus Medical Dissection Stent (AMDS), a novel partially uncovered aortic arch hybrid graft implanted antegrade during hypothermic circulatory arrest to promote true lumen expansion and enhance aortic remodeling. MethodsFrom March 2017 to February 2018, 16 consecutive patients (66 ± 12 years; 38% female) presented with acute type A aortic dissections and underwent emergent surgical aortic repair with AMDS implantation. All patients presented with DeBakey I aortic dissection, with evidence of malperfusion in 50% (n = 8) of patients. All cases were performed under hypothermic circulatory arrest with an additional average duration for AMDS implantation time of 2.1 minutes. ResultsAll 16 device implantations were successful. Overall 30-day mortality was 6.3% (n = 1) and stroke occurred in 6.3% (n = 1) of cases. There was no incidence of device-related aortic injury or aortic arch branch vessel occlusion. During the follow-up period, 12 patients had completed at least 1 postoperative computed tomography scan. At initial follow-up computed tomography scan, complete or partial thrombosis, and remodeling of the aortic arch occurred in 91.7% of cases (n = 11/12) and in the proximal descending thoracic aorta, complete or partial thrombosis, and remodeling occurred in 91.7% (n = 11/12). ConclusionsPreliminary results suggest that the AMDS is a safe, feasible and reproducible adjunct to current surgical approaches for acute DeBakey I aortic dissection repair. Further, the AMDS manages malperfusion and promotes early positive remodeling in the aortic arch and distal dissected segments, with favorable FL closure rates at follow-up. Ongoing follow-up will provide additional insight into the long-term effects of the AMDS.

Posterior communicating artery occlusion and recanalization through a fusiform aneurysm after flow diversion

Occlusion of branch vessels is a known potential sequela of the treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diversion. We present a case of occlusion and distal reconstitution of the origin of the posterior communicating artery through a fusiform aneurysm of the internal carotid artery after flow diversion. A 56-year-old woman was incidentally found to have a large fusiform aneurysm of the posterior communicating segment of the internal carotid artery incorporating the origin of the posterior communicating artery. The aneurysm was treated with placement of a Pipeline flow diverter. Follow-up computed tomography angiogram at 7 months demonstrated no change in aneurysm filling. A follow-up digital subtraction angiogram at 12 months demonstrated occlusion of the native origin of the posterior communicating artery with distal reconstitution through two accessory channels through the aneurysm. The remainder of the aneurysm was thrombosed. The patient had not had any clinical symptoms during this event. The unorganized nature of the thrombus within aneurysms after flow diversion may allow accessory vascular channels to form in the event of occlusion of a side branch.

The impact of prior aortic surgery on outcomes after multibranched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of prior aortic surgery on outcomes after multibranched endovascular aneurysm repair (MBEVAR) of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) and pararenal aortic aneurysms (PRAAs). MethodsFrom July 2005 to October 2016, there were 153 patients who underwent elective endovascular repair of TAAA and PRAA using multibranched stent grafts. Data on demographics, procedural details, and outcomes were collected prospectively. ResultsThe mean age was 73 ± 8 years, and 113 of 153 (74%) were men. Mean aneurysm diameter was 67 ± 9 mm. Before MBEVAR, 68 of 153 (44%) patients had undergone a prior aortic surgery; 49 of 68 (72%) had prior open aortic surgery, 15 of 68 (22%) had prior endovascular aortic surgery, and 4 of 68 (6%) had both. There were no significant differences in age, sex, preoperative aneurysm diameter, or medical comorbidities (coronary artery disease, lung disease, diabetes mellitus, or hypertension) in patients with previous aortic surgery compared with those without. Patients with previous aortic surgery had higher fluoroscopy times (131 ± 59 vs 118 ± 54 minutes; P = .18) and procedural times (370 ± 101 vs 345 ± 118 minutes; P = .27) during MBEVAR, but these differences did not reach statistical significance. Patients without previous aortic intervention had higher rates of postoperative paraplegia (9/85 [11%]) vs (0/68 [0%]; P = .005) compared with those with previous aortic surgery. Of 153 patients, 3 (2%) had a postoperative stroke, and this was not different between the two groups. Median follow-up time was 2.5 years (interquartile range, 1.0-4.5 years) and did not differ between those with and those without previous aortic surgery. Kaplan-Meier estimated 5-year freedom from aneurysm-related mortality and overall mortality was 90% and 48%, respectively, and did not differ between the two groups. There was also no difference in branch vessel occlusion between the two groups. ConclusionsA high proportion of patients undergoing MBEVAR for TAAA or PRAA have already undergone prior open or endovascular aortic procedures, but this does not appear to increase the complication rate or affect midterm clinical outcomes. Patients with prior aortic surgery who undergo MBEVAR have lower rates of paraplegia compared with those without prior surgery, which may be due to effective recruitment of collateral circulation.

Clinical importance of the anterior choroidal artery: a review of the literature.

The anterior choroidal artery (AChA) is a critical artery in brain physiology and function. The AChA is involved in many diseases, including aneurysm, brain infarct, Moyamoya disease (MMD), brain tumor, arteriovenous malformation (AVM), etc. The AChA is vulnerable to damage during the treatment of these diseases and is thus a very important vessel. However, a comprehensive systematic review of the importance of the AChA is currently lacking. In this study, we used the PUBMED database to perform a literature review of the AChA to increase our understanding of its role in neurophysiology. Although the AChA is a small thin artery, it supplies an extremely important region of the brain. The AChA consists of cisternal and plexal segments, and the point of entry into the choroidal plexus is known as the plexal point. During treatment for aneurysms, tumors, AVM or AVF, the AChA cisternal segments should be preserved as a pathway to prevent the infarction of the AChA target region in the brain. In MMD, a dilated AChA provides collateral flow for posterior circulation. In brain infarcts, rapid treatment is necessary to prevent brain damage. In Parkinson disease (PD), the role of the AChA is unclear. In trauma, the AChA can tear and result in intracranial hematoma. In addition, both chronic and non-chronic branch vessel occlusions in the AChA are clinically silent and should not deter aneurysm treatment with flow diversion. Based on the data available, the AChA is a highly essential vessel.

Ophthalmic artery occlusion after Pipeline Embolization Device placement with reconstitution of flow via an endoleak: a report of two cases

The Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) is a flow diverting stent used in the treatment of a wide variety of intracranial aneurysms. The device differs from traditional stents used in stent-assisted...

Need for Limb Revascularization in Patients with Acute Aortic Dissection is Associated with Mesenteric Ischemia

Acute aortic dissection (AAD) can cause limb ischemia due to branch vessel occlusion. A minority of patients have persistent ischemia after central aortic repair and require peripheral arterial revascularization. We investigated whether the need for limb revascularization is associated with adverse outcomes. We reviewed our cases of AAD from 2000 to 2014 and identified patients with malperfusion syndromes (coronary, cerebral, spinal, visceral, renal, or peripheral ischemia). Patients with DeBakey I/II (Stanford type A) dissection had urgent open repair of the ascending aorta. Patients with DeBakey III (Stanford type B) dissection were initiated on anti-impulse medical therapy and had either open aortic repair or thoracic endovascular aortic repair for malperfusion syndromes. Patients with persistent lower limb ischemia after aortic repair usually had either extra-anatomic bypass grafting or iliac stenting. Some DeBakey III patients had peripheral revascularization without central aortic repair. We performed univariate and multivariate analysis to determine the effects of need for limb revascularization and clinical outcomes. We treated 1,015 AAD patients (501 [49.4%] DeBakey I/II and 514 [50.6%] DeBakey III) with a mean age of 59.7±14.5years (67.5% males). Aortic repair was performed in all DeBakey I/II patients and in 103 (20.0%) DeBakey III patients. Overall 30-day mortality was 11.3%. Lower limb ischemia was present in 104 (10.3%) patients and was more common in DeBakey I/II compared with DeBakey III dissections (65.4% vs. 34.6%; odds ratio [OR] 2.1, confidence interval [CI] 1.4-3.2; P=0.001). Among the 40 patients who required limb revascularization, there was no difference in need for revascularization between DeBakey I/II and III patients. Patients requiring limb revascularization were more likely to have mesenteric ischemia compared with the rest of the cohort in both DeBakey I/II (P=0.037) and DeBakey III dissections (P<0.001) with worse 10-year survival (21.9 % vs. 59.2%, P<0.001). When adjusted for other malperfusion syndromes, patients with limb revascularization had similar long-term survival compared to uncomplicated dissection patients (P=0.960). Patients requiring lower limb revascularization after treatment for AAD are more likely to have mesenteric ischemia and worse survival. The need for limb revascularization is a marker for more extensive dissection and should prompt evaluation for visceral malperfusion.