Branch Of Superior Gluteal Artery Research Articles

Anatomic relationship between S2 sacroiliac screws' entry points and pelvic external branches of superior gluteal artery.

To study the relationship between the pelvic external branches of the superior gluteal artery and the entry area of the S2 sacroiliac screw to provide the anatomical basis and technical reference for avoiding the superior gluteal artery injury during the clinical screw placement. CTA imaging of superior gluteal artery of 74 healthy adults (37 males and 37 females) was randomly selected. The safe bony entry area ('safe area' for abbreviation) of S2 sacroiliac screw in the standard lateral view of the pelvis three-dimensional reconstruction CT image was determined by the CT auxiliary measurement software. The relationship between the pelvic external branches of the superior gluteal artery and the safe area of S2 sacroiliac screw was observed, and the cases in which the artery intersected the safe area were counted. The distance between the safe area and the superior gluteal artery branches closest to it was measured for the cases in which the artery and the safe area did not intersect. 21 of the 74 cases did not have a bone channel of horizontal S2 sacroiliac screw, so they were excluded from this study. In the remaining 53 cases, 12 cases had the deep superior branch of the superior gluteal artery through the safe area of S2 screw (22.6%), and 16 cases had the superficial branch of the superior gluteal artery through the safe area of S2 screw (30.2%). There was no obvious overlap feature and law between the safe area and the superficial and deep superior branches. In 20 cases of the 53 cases, the safe area of S2 screw was located between the deep superior branch and the superficial branch of superior gluteal artery (37.7%), and in 5 cases, the safe area of S2 screw was located behind the superficial branch of superior gluteal artery (9.4%). In the cases where the superior gluteal artery did not intersect the screw entry bony safe area, the part of superior gluteal artery closest to the safe area was located in front or back of the widest part of the safe area. The risk of accidental injury of the deep superior branch and superficial branch of the superior gluteal artery is high during the process of S2 sacroiliac screw placement. Even if the screw entry point is located in the bony safe area, the absolute safety of screw placement cannot be guaranteed. We strongly suggest that a careful and thorough plan is needed before surgery.

Morphology of Piriformis- its clinical implications in Piriformis syndrome

Background and Aim: Anatomical variations of neuromuscular structures of gluteal region are common. Each and every anatomical variation reflects a different and case specific clinical presentation. Piriformis is the key muscle to this region. This work was done to re-investigate the morphology of this muscle and structures related to it, in sufficient number of specimens to correlate with clinical syndrome. Materials and Methods: 60-lower extremities with gluteal region belonging to 30 embalmed adult human cadavers named as specimens comprised the material for this study. Gluteal region was dissected to see the variations in the origin, insertion and accessory slips of piriformis muscle. Results and Conclusion: Out of 60 specimens, piriformis consisted of one belly in 55 specimens (91.67%) and two bellies were observed in 5 specimens (8.33%). In two specimens belonging to one male cadaver, the piriformis was found being pierced by common trunk for inferior gluteal and common peroneal nerves whereas in three specimens piriformis was also being pierced by one root of posterior cutaneous nerve of thigh An accessory muscle was observed bilaterally in one cadaver. This accessory muscle was present below the piriformis on right side& it was related with the emergence of tibial nerve in between the piriformis and accessory muscle which is a rare pattern. On left side this accessory muscle was present above the piriformis & was associated with presence of superficial branch of superior gluteal artery between the upper border of piriformis and this accessory muscle. All these variations should be kept in mind during physical examination or evaluating radiological images of patients with low back pain. KEY WORDS: Anatomical variation, Piriformis, Pirifomis syndrome, extraspinal sciatic.

Anatomical relation between S1 sacroiliac screws\u2019 entrance points and superior gluteal artery

BackgroundTo conduct radiologic anatomical study on the relation between S1 sacroiliac screws’ entry points and the route of the pelvic outer superior gluteal artery branches with the aim to provide the anatomical basis and technical reference for the avoidance of damage to the superior gluteal artery during the horizontal sacroiliac screw placement.MethodsSuperior gluteal artery CTA (CT angiography) vascular imaging of 74 healthy adults (37 women and 37 men) was done with 128-slice spiral CT (computed tomography). The CT attendant-measuring software was used to portray the “safe bony entrance area” (hereinafter referred to as “Safe Area”) of the S1 segment in the standard lateral pelvic view of three-dimensional reconstruction. The anatomical relation between S1 sacroiliac screws’ Safe Area and the pelvic outer superior gluteal artery branches was observed and recorded. The number of cases in which artery branches intersected the Safe Area was counted. The cases in which superior gluteal artery branches disjointed from the Safe Area were identified, and the shortest distance between the Safe Area and the superior gluteal artery branch closest to the Safe Area was measured.ResultsThree cases out of the 74 sample cases were excluded from this study as they were found to have no bony space for horizontal screw placement in S1 segment. Among the remaining 71 sample cases, there are 32 cases (45.1%) where the deep superior branch of superior gluteal artery passes through the Safe Area of S1 entrance point. There was no distinguishing feature and rule on how the deep superior branches and the Safe Area overlapped. In the 39 cases in which superior gluteal artery branches disjointed from the Safe Area, the deep superior branches of superior gluteal artery were the branches closest to the Safe Area and the part of the branch closest to the Safe Area was located in front of the widest part of the Safe Area. The shortest distance between the deep superior branch and the Safe Area is 0.86 ± 0.84 cm.ConclusionThere is a high risk of accidental injury of the deep superior branches of superior gluteal artery in the process of S1 sacroiliac screw placement. Even if the entry points are located in the safe bony entrance area, the absolute secure placement cannot be assured. We suggest that great attention should be paid to make thorough preoperative plans.

Traumatic subperiosteal pseudoaneurysm: rare cause of subperiosteal hematoma

Subperiosteal hematoma arises usually after blunt trauma to the bone. It is due to disinsertion or rupture of a muscle tendon or injury of nutrient artery of bone. Subperiosteal hematoma is a rare condition and develops mainly in the orbit because the periosteum is more loosely attached to the bone. Thus, few cases of subperiosteal hematoma in iliac bone are reported. Traumatic pseudoaneurysm develops mainly after penetrating or blunt trauma. It can be easily diagnosed by intravenous contrast computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging by seen extravasation of contrast dye. We present a case of subperiosteal hematoma with subperiosteal pseudoaneurysm after blunt pelvic trauma in a 17-year-old adolescent boy. The pseudoaneurysm arose from a branch of superior gluteal artery, but it was not seen in the initial contrast computed tomography scan.