Brain Progression-free Survival Research Articles

Surgery vs. Radiosurgery for Patients with Localized Metastatic Brain Disease: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Purpose: To analyze the efficacy and safety of surgery compared to radiosurgery (RS), combined or not with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), for localized metastatic brain disease. Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. The inclusion criteria were limited to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared surgery and RS for patients with up to 3 metastases (median diameter ≤ 4 cm). The primary outcomes were represented by overall survival (OS) and local brain progression-free survival (PFS), with the rate of complications as a secondary outcome. The pooled estimates were calculated using random forest models. The risk of bias was evaluated using the RoB2 revised tool and the certainty of the evidence was assessed according to the GRADE guidelines. Results: In total, 11,256 records were identified through database and register searches. After study selection, 3 RCTs and 353 patients were included in the quantitative synthesis. Surgery and RS represented the main intervention arms in all the included RCTs. Conclusions: A low level of evidence suggests that RS alone and surgery followed by WBRT provide an equal rate of local brain PFS in patients with localized metastatic brain disease. There is a very low level of evidence that surgery and RS as main interventions offer equivalent OS in the population investigated. A reliable assessment of the complication rates among surgery and RS was not achievable. The lack of high-certainty evidence either for superiority or equivalence of these treatments emphasizes the need for further, more accurate, RCTs comparing surgery and RS as local treatment in patients with oligometastatic brain disease.

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of brain metastases: results of a retrospective study

BackgroundLasting local control of brain metastases following stereotactic radiotherapy is becoming increasingly relevant since systemic treatment constantly improves the prognosis of patients with extracranial metastases.Methods73 patients with 103 brain metastases received hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) in 6 fractions of 5 Gy between January 2017 and December 2021 at the University Hospital Regensburg, Germany. The study retrospectively evaluated local progression free survival (LPFS), overall survival (OS) and distant brain progression free survival (DPFS) of patients without prior radiotherapy of the brain. Response rate and brain radiation necrosis were reported. Cox proportional hazard models evaluated prognostic factors of OS and LPFS.ResultsThe median patient age was 61.0 years (Interquartile range, IQR 51.0, 67.5). The most common tumor types were malignant melanoma (34.2%) and non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma (26.0%). The median gross tumor volume (GTV) was 0.9 cm³ (IQR 0.4, 3.6). The median follow-up time of all patients was 36.3 months (95%CI 29.1, 43.4). The median OS was 17.4 months (95%CI 9.9, 24.9). Overall survival rates at 6-, 12-, 18-, 24-, and 30 months were 81.9%, 59.1%, 49.0%, 41.3%, and 37.2%, retrospectively. The mean LPFS was 38.1 months (95%CI 31.4, 44.9), while the median LPFS has not been reached. LPFS rates at 6-, 12-, 18-, 24- and 30 months were 78.9%, 68.7%, 64.3%, 61.6% and 58.7%, retrospectively. Median DPFS of all patients was 7.7 months (95%CI 6.1, 9.3). Six, 12-, 18-, 24- and 30 months DPFS rates were 62.1%, 36.3%, 31.1%, 24.8% and 21.7%. Five brain metastases (4.8%) developed brain radiation necrosis. In multivariate analysis, the number of brain metastases negatively affected LPFS. Non-melanoma and non-renal cell cancer was associated with a higher chance of LPFS in comparison to other cancer. A GTV > 1.5 cm³ translated into a higher risk of death compared to a GTV ≤ 1.5 cm³ and Karnofsky performance score was predictive of OS.ConclusionsFSRT in 6 fractions of 5 Gy seems to be an effective treatment with an acceptable local control for patients with brain metastases although melanoma and renal cell cancer seem to have a worse local control in comparison to other cancer.Trial registrationThis study is retrospectively registered.

Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: Factors Affecting Outcomes and Radiation Necrosis

Stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) is a proven effective treatment for brain metastases (BM); however, symptomatic radiation necrosis (RN) is a late effect that may impact on patient's quality of life. The aim of our study was to retrospectively evaluate survival outcomes and characterize the occurrence of RN in a cohort of BM patients treated with ablative SRT at Federico II University Hospital. Clinical and dosimetric factors of 87 patients bearing a total of 220 BMs treated with SRT from 2016 to 2022 were analyzed. Among them, 46 patients with 127 BMs having clinical and MRI follow-up (FUP) ≥ 6 months were selected for RN evaluation. Dosimetric parameters of the uninvolved brain (brain without GTV) were extracted. The crude local control was 91% with neither clinical factors nor prescription dose correlating with local failure (LF). At a median FUP of 9 (1-68) months, the estimated median overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and brain progression-free survival (bPFS) were 16, 6, and 9 months, respectively. The estimated OS rates at 1 and 3 years were 59.8% and 18.3%, respectively; bPFS at 1 and 3 years was 29.9% and 13.5%, respectively; PFS at 1 and 3 years was 15.7% and 0%, respectively; and local failure-free survival (LFFS) at 1 and 3 years was 87.2% and 83.8%, respectively. Extracranial disease status was an independent factor related to OS. Fourteen (30%) patients manifested RN. At multivariate analysis, adenocarcinoma histology, left location, and absence of chemotherapy were confirmed as independent risk factors for any-grade RN. Nine (20%) patients developed symptomatic (G2) RN, which improved or stabilized after 1-16 months of steroid therapy. With prompt recognition and, when necessary, medical therapy, RN radiological and clinical amelioration can be obtained.

Synchronous brain metastases as a poor prognosis factor in clear cell renal carcinoma: a strong argument for systematic brain screening.

Brain metastases (BM) usually represent a poor prognostic factor in solid tumors. About 10% of patients with renal cancer (RCC) will present BM. Local therapies such as stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), and surgery are used to achieve brain control. We compared survival between patients with synchronous BM (SynBM group) and metachronous BM (MetaBM group). It is a retrospective study of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and BM treated with TKI between 2005 and 2019 at the Centre Léon Bérard in Lyon. We collected prognostic factors: The International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk score, the TNM stage, the histological subtypes and the Fuhrman grade. Overall survival (OS) was defined from diagnosis of metastatic ccRCC to death. Brain progression-free survival (B-PFS) was defined from focal brain therapy to brain progression or death. 99 patients were analyzed, 44 in the SynBM group and 55 in the MetaBM group. OS in the MetaBM group was 49.4months versus 19.6months in the SynBM group, p = 0.0002. The median time from diagnosis of metastasic disease to apparition ofBM in the MetaBM group was 22.9months (4.3; 125.7). SRT was used for 101 lesions (66.4%), WBRT for 25 patients (16.4%), surgery for 21 lesions (13.8%), surgery followed by radiation for 5 lesions (3.3%). B-PFS for all patients was 7months (IC95% [5.0-10.5]). Survival of patients with synchronous BM is inferior to that of patients with metachronous BM. Outcome is poor in both cases after diagnosis of BM. Brain screening should be encouraged at time of diagnosis of metastatis in ccRCC.

Outcomes of Initial Therapy for Synchronous Brain Metastases from Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has a propensity for brain metastases, which is associated with poor prognosis. 20% of SCLC patients have synchronous brain metastases at initial diagnosis. We sought to determine predictors of overall survival (OS) and brain progression-free survival (bPFS) in SCLC patients with synchronous brain metastases treated with chemotherapy (chemo) and/or whole brain radiation (WBRT). Among the 836 SCLC patients treated at a single institution between 1998 and 2018, 109 patients with synchronous brain metastases at initial diagnosis were included in this retrospective analysis. Survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors predictive of OS and bPFS were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression modeling and log-rank testing. Of the 109 patients, 18 received chemo without WBRT, 15 received WBRT without chemo, and 76 received chemo and WBRT. Of the 76 patients who received chemo and WBRT, 8 started both concurrently, 35 received chemo first, and 33 received WBRT first. Median WBRT dose was 30 Gy in 10 fractions. The median number of brain lesions at diagnosis was 3, and the median size of the largest metastasis was 2.0 cm. Median OS for the entire cohort was 9 months and median bPFS was 8.4 months. OS was 30.3% at 1 year and 14.4% at 2 years. Increased number of brain lesions was significantly associated with decreased OS. 59 patients presented with neurological symptoms, which was not associated with OS or bPFS. 46 patients had isolated brain metastases (no extracranial metastases), which was not associated with improved OS (p = 0.061) or bPFS (p = 0.17) compared to patients with other extracranial metastatic disease. The median age at diagnosis was 63. Patients younger than 63 years old had improved OS compared to patients age 63 or older, but not bPFS. Patients who received chemo and WBRT had improved OS compared to those who had either chemo or WBRT alone (p<0.001), but there was no difference in bPFS (p = 0.34). There was no significant difference in OS or bPFS depending on the sequence of therapy initiation. For patients who had chemo followed by WBRT, the median time between start of chemo and start of radiation was 103 days (range 6 – 182 days), which was not significantly associated with OS or bPFS. 13 patients received upfront brain metastasis resection, which was associated with improved OS but not bPFS compared to those who did not have surgery. 14 patients received SRS or partial brain radiation as part of their initial therapy, which was not significantly associated with OS or bPFS. 15 patients received salvage brain radiation after WBRT failure, which was associated with improved OS compared to those who did not have salvage radiation (25.5 months vs 8.0 months, p<0.001). The combination of chemo and WBRT was associated with improved OS compared to either modality alone. The sequence of treatment was not associated with OS or bPFS. Shorter time to WBRT after chemo was not significantly associated with OS or bPFS.

Impact of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) Combined With Radiation Therapy for the Management of Brain Metastases From Renal Cell Carcinoma

Background: Targeted therapy has transformed the outcome for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Their efficacy and safety have also been demonstrated in brain metastatic RCC. Preclinical evidence suggests synergism of radiation and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Consequently, several studies have compared their efficacy in the treatment of RCC brain metastases to the era of brain management with surgery/radiation only.Objectives: We seek to systematically review and meta-analyze the results of those studies that involved comparative intervention groups of brain management; TKIs, and never used TKIs.Methods and Materials: Online databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched for comparative studies. Overall survival as the primary outcome of interest, and local brain control, distant control, and adverse events as secondary outcomes of interest were recorded for meta-analysis. Hazard ratios were pooled together using Review Manager 5.3. Fixed effects or random effects model were adopted according to the level of heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis included studies that involved SRS as the local treatment of management.Results: Overall 7 studies (n = 897) were included for meta-analysis. TKI use was associated with better survival (HR 0.60 [0.52, 0.69], p < 0.00001) and local brain control (HR 0.34 [0.11, 0.98], p = 0.05). SRS subgroup also revealed significantly better survival (HR 0.61 [0.44, 0.83], p = 0.002) and local brain control (HR 0.19 [0.08, 0.45], p = 0.0002). Distant brain control (HR 0.95 [0.67, 1.35], p = 0.79) and brain progression free survival were unaffected (HR 0.94 [0.56, 1.56], p = 0.80). Only one study (n = 376) reported significantly greater 12-months cumulative incidence of radiation necrosis with TKI use within 30 days of SRS (10.9 vs. 6.4%, p = 0.04).Conclusions: TKIs use in combination with SRS is safe and effective for treating RCC brain metastases. Larger randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate the results.

Stereotactic radiosurgery combined with anti-PD1 for the management of melanoma brain metastases: A retrospective study of safety and efficacy

BackgroundBrain metastases can be effectively treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Immune checkpoint inhibitors are now pivotal in metastatic melanoma care, but some concerns have emerged regarding the safety of their combination with radiation therapy. MethodsWe present a retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients treated by anti-PD1 and SRS as a sole modality of radiation therapy (no whole brain radiation therapy at any time) in a single institution. We included patients on anti-PD1 at the time of SRS or patients who started anti-PD1 within a maximum period of 3 months following SRS and were treated at least one year before the analysis. Clinical and serial imaging data were reviewed to determine the efficacy and the rate of adverse radiation effectss of the combination. ResultsA total of 50 patients were included. SRS targeted 1, 2 to 3 and >3 brain metastases in 17, 16 and 17 patients, respectively. Two patients died before the first evaluation. Nine patients presented with an increase in peritumoral oedema, three with intracranial haemorrhage and one patient with both oedema and haemorrhage. Median follow-up was 38.89 months (interquartile range 24.43; 45.28). Median overall survival from SRS was 16.62 months with 1-, 2- and 3-year rates of 60%, 40% and 35%, respectively. Median brain-Progression Free Survival was 13.2 months with 1, 2 and 3-year rates of 62.1%, 49.7% and 49.7%, respectively. ConclusionsThis real-world cohort of patients treated with a homogeneous strategy combining upfront stereotactic radiosurgery and anti-PD1 shows remarkable survival rates and does not reveal unexpected toxicity.

Stereotactic Radiation Therapy in Colorectal Cancer Brain Metastasis: An International, Multicentric Cohort

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in western countries, but brain metastases only occur in 1% of CRC patients. Overall survival in CRC patients rises as new systemic drugs became available. Thus the incidence of brain metastases in CRC patients will likely increase. We conducted a multicentric analysis to evaluate and compare the outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) in CRC brain metastasis management. On behalf of the association of French-speaking neuro-oncologist (ANOCEF), we retrospectively collected individual data of patients treated with SRS or HFSRT for CRC brain metastases in 6 hospitals in France and Germany. The primary endpoint of the study was the radiological response rate defines as a complete response, partial response, or stability of the metastasis according to RANO BM criteria. The median follow-up from initial treatment was 31 months. The median response rate for metastasis treated was 65.9% (CI 95% [51.9% – 79.9%]) and was positively influenced by SRS whereas multiple brain metastases were related to poorest response rates as reported in the table below.Abstract 2188; Table 1ORSD2.5%97.5%p(OR<1)p(OR>1)Disease controlled0.730.510.172.050.790.21Multiple brain metastases0.720.520.162.050.800.20PTV volume (mL)0.990.030.941.040.700.30SRS3.274.120.3613.500.210.79 Open table in a new tab The median overall survival (OS) from initial treatment was ten months (CI 95% [5 – 22]). OS was negatively influenced by extra-cranial metastases, male gender, whereas it influenced positively by brain progression-free survival (BPFS). We report the results of one of the largest cohort of CRC brain metastasis treated with stereotactic radiotherapy. Our analysis suggests that age is associated with a higher response probability while the control of the disease is associated with a lower response probability. However, patients with a controlled disease are more likely to live longer and thus experience a progression of the treated metastasis. Finally, SRS seems to be associated with a higher response probability.

Retrospective analysis of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for tumors larger than 2 cm.

ABSTRACTStereotactic radiosurgery for large brain metastases (BM) not amenable to surgical resection is associated with limited local control and neurotoxicity, while hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) has emerged as a promising option. We retrospectively evaluated 61 patients with BM larger than 2 cm in the maximum diameter, who were treated with HFSRT (mainly 35 Gy/5 fractions) in our center between 2006–2016, focusing on the effect of BM size on outcomes. Eligible patients were divided according to the maximum BM diameter (group A [23 patients]: ≥3 cm, group B [22 patients]: <3 cm) to assess the relationship between tumor size and prognosis or safety. The primary outcome was the local control rate (LCR), and secondary outcomes were the response rate (RR), brain progression-free survival (BPFS), median survival time (MST), and radionecrosis (RN). Univariate and multivariate analyses for LCR were conducted using Cox’s proportional hazards model. In the 45 eligible patients (58 lesions) enrolled in this study, the RR was 86.4% with an overall LCR of 64.7% at 12 months (67.1% for group A and 61.5% for group B [p = 0.45]). The median BPFS and MST were 11.6 and 14.2 months, respectively. Univariate analyses revealed that female patients and gynecological cancer patients had poorer LCR, but they were not significantly independent prognostic factors (p = 0.06, 0.09, respectively). Two patients (4.4%) experienced RN that was detected more than 4 years after HFSRT. We conclude that HFSRT is safe for large BM but further studies are needed to determine optimal doses and fractions.

Frameless stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: a review of outcomes and prognostic scores evaluation.

Stereotactic brain radiosurgery provides good local control in patients with limited brain metastases. A newly developed frameless system allows pain-free treatment. We reviewed the effectiveness of this frameless stereotactic brain radiosurgery and identified prognostic factors that may aid better patient selection. Medical records of patients with brain metastases treated with linear accelerator-based frameless stereotactic brain radiosurgery between January 2010 and July 2015 in a university affiliated hospital in Hong Kong were reviewed. Outcomes including local and distant brain control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival were analysed. Prognostic factors were identified by univariable and multivariable analyses. Association of outcomes with four common prognostic scores was performed. In this study, 64 patients with 94 lesions were treated with a median dose of 18 Gy (range, 12-22 Gy) in a single fraction. The median follow-up was 11.5 months. One-year actuarial local and distant brain control rates were 72% and 71%, respectively. The median overall survival was 13.0 months. On multivariable analysis, Karnofsky performance status score (>50 vs ≤50) and number of lesions (1-2 vs ≥3) were found to associate significantly with distinct brain progression-free survival (P=0.022, hazard ratio=0.20, 95% confidence interval 0.05-0.80 and P=0.003, hazard ratio=0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.14-0.68, respectively). Overall survival was associated significantly with Basic Score for Brain Metastases (P=0.031), Score Index for Radiosurgery in Brain Metastases (P=0.007), and Graded Prognostic Assessment (P=0.003). Improvement in overall survival was observed in all groups of different prognostic scores. Frameless stereotactic brain radiosurgery is effective in patients with oligo-metastases of brain and should be increasingly considered in patients with favourable prognostic scoring.

Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation predicts favorable outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery

PurposeThe impact of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations on radiotherapy for brain metastases (BM) is undetermined. We evaluated the effects of EGFR mutation status on responses and outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with BM, treated with upfront or salvage stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Methods and materialsFrom 2008 to 2015, 147 eligible NSCLC patients with 300 lesions were retrospectively analyzed. Patterns of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy were recorded. Radiographic response was assessed. Brain progression-free survival (BPFS) and overall survival were calculated and outcome prognostic factors were evaluated. ResultsMedian follow-up time was 13.5 months. Of the EGFR-genotyped patients, 79 (65%) were EGFR mutants, and 42 (35%) were wild type. Presence of EGFR mutations was associated with higher radiographic complete response rates (CRR). Median time to develop new BM after SRS was significantly longer for mutant-EGFR patients (17 versus 10.5 months, p = 0.02), predominantly for those with adjuvant TKI therapy (26.3 versus 15 months, p = 0.01). EGFR mutations independently predicted better BPFS (HR = 0.55, p = 0.048) in multivariate analysis. ConclusionsIn patients with NSCLC treated with SRS for BM, the presence of EGFR mutations is associated with a higher CRR, longer time for distant brain control, and better BPFS. The combination of SRS and TKI in selective patient group can be an effective treatment choice for BM with favorable brain control and little neurotoxicity.

Effectiveness and Safety of Combined Cranial Stereotactic Radiation and Anti-PD-1 Therapy for Melanoma Brain Metastases

Even though it has been proven that anti-programmed death-1 (anti-PD-1) therapy increases overall survival (OS) among metastatic melanoma patients, radiotherapy is still needed either for management of unresectable brain metastases (BM) as in postoperative setting. Thus, it is necessary to define effectiveness and safety of anti-PD-1, nivolumab in this cohort, and cranial stereotactic radiation (CSR) combined. We selected individuals with detected BM who were treated with CSR within 6 months of receiving nivolumab. Analyses were retrospectively done in 53 patients with metastatic melanoma treated with nivolumab on an expanded access program at a single institution. The median number of previous systemic treatments before nivolumab was 3. The primary end points were BM control and OS; secondary end points were toxicity, brain progression free-survival (BPFS), and whole-brain radiotherapy free-survival (WBRTFS). Nine patients with 38 BM who underwent CSR from May 2014 to October 2016, were analyzed. Eight (89%) of these patients received CSR before and one (11%) during nivolumab treatment, with a median time of 49 (38-186) days before the first nivolumab cycle. Five (13%) lesions were treated with stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT), from which 3 were resected and had the tumor bed irradiated. The remaining 33 (87%) lesions underwent stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), single fraction, with a median dose of 18,5 Gy and a median volume of 0,6 cc. None acute toxicity was observed. Six lesions were considered as local BM failure through a median follow-up of 16 months, and WBRT was performed in 3 patients after BM disseminated failure. Kaplan-Meier estimates for BM control were 79,7% and 72,5% at 12 and 24 months, respectively, while the median OS from the date of CSR was 22,4 months. The median BPFS and WBRTFS were 15,37 and 21,9 months, respectively. In this study, the OS and BM control were superior to those ones established for standard treatments. Neurotoxicity did not appear to be an issue in our cohort and neither on the scarce available studies about this matter. Further prospective investigational studies are necessary to confirm our conclusions.

Stereotactic radiation therapy of brain metastases from colorectal cancer: A single institution cohort

PurposeThe brain remains an uncommon site of colorectal cancer metastases. Due to the improvement of overall colorectal cancer patient survival, the incidence of brain metastases will likely rise. We report the efficacy and safety of hypofractionnated stereotactic radiation therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery, and its role in colorectal cancer brain metastasis management. Methods and materialBetween June 2010 and December 2014, fifteen consecutive patients received hypofractionnated stereotactic radiation therapy or stereotactic radiosurgery as first local therapy or following surgical removal for colorectal cancer brain metastases. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints were brain progression free survival, in field control rates and safety. ResultsMedian follow-up was 41 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: [8.9–73.1 months]), median overall survival was 8 months (95% CI [4.7–11.3 months]), and median brain progression-free survival was 5 months (95% CI [3.9–6.1 months]). Five in field recurrences were observed, which makes a control rate per metastases at 6 and 12 months of 77.8% (95% CI [74.34%–81.26%]), 51.9% (95% CI [44.21%–59.59%]) respectively. Over the 19 treatment sequences, five in field recurences were observed: 6, 12 and 18 months control rate per treatment sequence were 93.3% (95% CI [90.42%–96.18%]), 68.1% (95% CI [62.03%–74.17%]) and 45.4% (95% CI [36.14%–54.66%]) respectively. Immediate tolerance was good with no toxicity grade III or more. Long-term toxicity included two radionecrosis among which, one was symptomatic. DiscussionThe results of this retrospective analysis suggest that hypofractionnated stereotactic radiation therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery are effective and safe treatment modalities for single and multiple small brain metastases from colorectal cancer. However, results need to be confirmed by multicenter, collected data.

Perilesional edema in brain metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as predictor of response to radiosurgery (SRS).

Radiosurgery (SRS) is widely used in the treatment of brain oligo-metastases from NSCLC. The aim of present study is to evaluate the extent of perilesional edema in brain metastases as predictive factor of treatment response. This single center retrospective study included 42 consecutive patients (January 2011-December 2014) with 1-2 brain metastasis from NSCLC treated with Radiosurgery (SRS). Extent of perilesional edema was measured as maximal extension from the edge of lesion and classified as minor (<10mm) or major (≥10mm). We analyzed Modality of Brain Recurrence (MBR), classified as in-field or out-of- field, and Brain Progression Free-Survival (BPFS) after treatment stratified according to extent of perilesional edema. Analyzing modality of brain recurrence and BPFS, after a median follow-up of 6months, we found that patients with minor edema had a better radiological response to SRS with none in-field recurrences and a lower risk of the onset of new brain lesions (out-of-field recurrence). Instead, patients group with major edema had a worse response rate of lesions treated, further, a higher risk of out-of-field brain relapse. Extent of perilesional edema in brain metastasis from NSCLC could be a predictive factor of response and brain progression after SRS treatment alone.

Brain metastasis reirradiation in patients with advanced breast cancer.

The outcome of recurrent brain metastasis is dismal. This study aims to assess the clinical outcomes and toxicity of reirradiation as a salvage treatment for progressive brain metastasis in patients with advanced breast cancer. Between July 2005 and September 2014, the medical records of 56 patients with brain metastasis from breast cancer were retrospectively reviewed. Of these patients, 39 received whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) followed by stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) reirradiation (Group 1), and 17 received SRS followed by WBRT reirradiation (Group 2). Overall survival (OS) and brain progression-free survival rates/times were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Prognostic factors were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards model. Change in neurologic function was also assessed. The median OS was 10.8 months (range, 1.3–56.8 months). In Group 1, the median PFS time (PFS-1) was 6.5 months and the OS time was 11.4 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that longer OS was significantly associated with a high Karnofsky performance score (KPS) (P = 0.004), controlled extracranial metastasis (P = 0.001) and a good response to reirradiation (P = 0.034). In Group 2, the median PFS time (PFS-2) after reirradiation was 8.5 months and the OS time was 10.8 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that longer OS was significantly associated with a high KPS (P = 0.018). The majority of the patients had improved or stable neurological function. Reirradiation is an effective and a safe treatment for patients with brain metastases from breast cancer. It might delay the progression of intracranial disease and improve neurological function. A suitable patient selection for reirradiation was suggested.

Population-based Analysis of Treatment and Survival in Women Presenting With Brain Metastasis at Initial Breast Cancer Diagnosis

Brain metastasis at initial breast cancer diagnosis is rare. This study aims to evaluate the clinical characteristics of these patients and identify prognostic and treatment factors associated with improved survival. Subjects were 35 women referred from 1996 to 2005 with newly diagnosed breast cancer with synchronous brain metastasis. Overall survival (OS) and brain progression-free survival were examined using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared between subgroups with different clinicopathologic and treatment characteristics using log-rank tests. Median age was 65 years. Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone was used in 25 patients, surgical resection and postoperative WBRT in 5 patients, and no or unknown treatment in 5 patients. Patients who underwent cranial resection were more likely to have solitary brain metastasis (P=0.003) and no visceral involvement (P=0.006). Overall, median OS was 6.8 months and median brain progression-free survival was 6.5 months (range, 0.7 to 54 mo). Median OS were 15 months with surgery and postoperative WBRT, 5 months with WBRT alone, and 3 months with no brain treatment. Longer OS was observed with age below 65 years versus 65 years and above (11 vs. 5 mo, P=0.046), 0 to 1 versus ≥2 sites of extracranial metastasis (10 vs. 3 mo, P=0.047), and diagnosis from 2001 to 2005 versus 1996 to 2000 (10 vs. 3 mo, P=0.018). A trend toward improved OS was observed in patients with no visceral involvement (11 vs. 4 mo, P=0.09). In this unique cohort presenting with breast cancer and synchronous brain metastasis, longer survival were observed with young age, limited extracranial metastasis, and no visceral disease. These characteristics may be used to select candidates for more aggressive treatment.

Prognostic Value of MR Imaging Texture Analysis in Brain Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Oligo-Metastases Undergoing Stereotactic Irradiation.

Background Stereotactic irradiation is widely used in brain oligo-metastases treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) texture analysis (TA) of brain metastases (BM) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Materials and methods This study included thirty-eight consecutive patients undergoing stereotactic irradiation, that is, stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy (SRT) or radiosurgery (SRS), from January 2011 to December 2014 for 1-2 brain BM from NSCLC. Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was not delivered. The diagnostic MRI DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) images were collected and analyzed with a homemade ImageJ macro, and typical TA parameters (mean, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, entropy, and uniformity) were evaluated for: brain progression-free survival; modality of brain metastatic progression (local progression or/and new metastases); and overall survival, after SRT/SRS.ResultsAfter SRT/SRS 14 patients (36.8%) experienced recurrence in the brain, with a recurrence in the irradiated site (five patients, 13.2%), new metastases (11 patients, 28.9%), local recurrence and new metastases (two patients, 5.25%). Nineteen patients (50%) died of tumor progression or other causes. Entropy and uniformity were significantly associated with local progression, whereas kurtosis was significantly associated with both local progression and new brain metastases.Conclusions These results appear promising, since the knowledge of factors correlated with the modality of brain progression after stereotactic irradiation of brain oligo-metastatic foci of NSCLC might help in driving the best treatment in these patients (association of SRT/SRS with WBRT? Increase of SRT/SRS dose?). Our preliminary data needs confirmation in large patient series.

Central nervous system involvement in breast cancer patients: Is the therapeutic landscape changing too slowly?

Central nervous system (CNS) involvement from breast cancer (BC) has been historically considered a relatively rare event. However, the development of new therapeutic strategies with a better control of extra-cranial disease and a longer overall survival (OS) has determined an increased incidence of brain metastases. Patients with HER2-positive or triple negative BC have higher occurrence of CNS involvement than patients with luminal-like disease. Moreover, after development of brain metastases, the prognosis is highly influenced by biological subtype. In patients with multiple brain metastases who experience important neurological symptoms, palliative treatment, with or without whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), needs to be considered the first step of a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach. Patients with a good performance status and 1-3 brain lesions should be considered for radical surgery; patients technically inoperable with 4-5 metastases smaller than 3cm may undergo stereotactic radiosurgery. The role of systemic therapy in the management of patients with brain metastases is controversial. Preliminary data suggest that systemic therapy after WBRT may improve survival in BC patients with brain lesions. In patients with HER2-positive disease, several retrospective or post hoc analyses showed a longer brain progression-free survival with trastuzumab in combination with or followed by other anti-HER2 drugs (such as pertuzumab, lapatinib, and T-DM1). Until now, no new strategies or drugs are available for triple-negative and luminal-like BC.

The challenge of durable brain control in patients with brain-only metastases from breast cancer.

The vast majority of patients with brain metastases from breast cancer have extracranial metastases, e.g., in the liver, lungs or bones, with serious impact on prognosis. Limited research has been performed on patients with brain-only disease. We analyzed patterns of treatment, brain control and survival in uni- and multivariate analyses. All 25 patients with brain-only disease were treated with radiotherapy (whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with or without stereotactic radiotherapy/radiosurgery (SRS) or surgical resection) and most patients with systemic treatment later during the disease trajectory. Only a minority of patients remained free from brain progression at 1 year after their initial therapy, regardless of initial treatment approach (median brain progression-free survival 6.2 months). However, overall survival was significantly better after initial surgical resection/SRS as compared to upfront WBRT (median 24.1 and 5.2 months, respectively). For all patients combined, median survival was 11.7 months (2-year survival rate 28 %). Several prognostic factors for shorter survival were identified in multivariate regression analysis: lower KPS, triple-negative tumor, coordination deficit, older age, lack of upfront surgical resection or SRS, and lack of endocrine or HER2-directed therapy after brain metastases treatment. Although durable brain control and long-term survival beyond 5 years could be achieved in a subset of patients (largely after successful salvage), progression of brain metastases during the first year after diagnosis was common. Prognosis was influenced by patient-, disease- and treatment-related factors.

Survival following gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastasis from breast cancer

BackgroundBreast cancer is the second most common cause of brain metastases in the United States. Although breast cancer induced brain metastases represent an incurable condition, some patients experience prolonged survival. In this retrospective study, we examine a cohort of patients with brain metastases from breast cancer treated with Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery to identify factors that predict better outcomes.MethodsA retrospective database of 100 patients treated for brain metastases due to breast cancer via Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKS) from July 1998 through March 2009 was reviewed. Patients who received radiosurgery as sole treatment, as a planned boost after whole brain radiotherapy or surgical resection, or as salvage after prior whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) or surgical resection were included. Prognostic factors identified to be significant for survival in previous brain metastasis studies were analyzed for significance by univariate and multivariate Cox analysis.ResultsOverall, the median brain progression-free survival time was 7.1 months and the median survival time was 12.3 months. No prognostic variables were significant for brain progression-free survival. For patients treated with a planned GKS after WBRT, GKS as sole treatment, GKS salvage after WBRT, GKS boost after surgery, or GKS for surgical salvage the median survival times (MSTs) were as follows: 12.2 months, 12.4 months, 9.5 months, 27.6 months and 33.4 months respectively. Differences between the groups were not significant (p = 0.06); however, GKS boost after surgery and GKS for salvage after surgery did have a trend toward better overall survival.The MST for patients of age <65 years was 14.5 months, compared to age ≥65 which was 7.7 months (p = 0.06) and remained a significant prognostic factor for overall survival on multivariate analysis. The MST for patients with a single lesion was 16.9 months, not significantly different than the MST of 14.5 months for patients with 2–3 lesions. However patients with >3 lesions had a MST of 5.9 months, which was significantly worse. Breast cancer subtype as approximated by biomarkers and KPS were not significant predictors of overall survival and stage at initial diagnosis was inversely associated with survival.ConclusionStereotactic radiosurgery offers good local control and prolonged survival in selected patients. Age and number of lesions are strong predictors of overall survival.