Traumatic brain injury is recognized as the biggest cause of death and acquired disability after infancy. Its importance, especially in children, has been re-emphasized by a recent population based study, the first of its kind, which found a much higher incidence than previously reported: 790 per 100 000 person years.1 This was chiefly due to the detection of more cases of mild injury, which accounted for 95% overall. Children under 5 had the highest incidence and 70% of all cases were in children and young adults. Falls were the biggest cause, except in the 15-34 year age group where transport accidents were more frequent and injuries more likely to be moderate or severe. These data add to previous studies, especially in informing policies aimed at prevention, which are already showing benefits in many countries. However, once a child or adult has had a severe brain injury it is still uncertain how best to help them. Prompt effective resuscitation and subsequent intensive care are beneficial, but what next? Much attention has been devoted to the management of raised intracranial pressure, which occurs due to the brain swelling inside a fixed compartment (the skull) and can lead to impaired blood supply and cerebral herniation. In adults, observational studies have suggested that measurement of intracranial pressure and decompression by various different craniectomy procedures improves outcome. However, more recent controlled studies indicate that this may not be correct. The DECRA trial in Australia and New Zealand randomized 155 adults to receive bifrontotemporoparietal decompressive craniectomy, with dural opening, or standard care.2 Those in the craniectomy group had a lower intracranial pressure and duration of intensive care stay, more immediate complications especially hydrocephalus, and a poorer outcome at 6 months follow-up. Another major study in South America randomized 324 adults and adolescents to intracranial pressure assessment either by clinical and imaging criteria or by direct measurement.3 The first group received significantly more brain specific interventions such as hyperventilation, mannitol and hypertonic saline, although not more cerebrospinal fluid drainage or craniectomy, but there was no difference in mortality or other outcome measures. The DECRA trial also illustrates the difficulties of such studies: over 3000 patients were assessed for eligibility, one unit contributed over a third of the data, and it took 12 years to enrol enough patients to meet even a revised statistical threshold. The trial has been criticized from various aspects including the entry criteria.4 Another international trial, RESCUEicp, using the same surgical technique but different entry criteria in patients aged 10 to 65 years, is currently in progress.4 Finally, decompression is only one possible tool in acute management: others such as hypothermia, hyperventilation, and hyperosmolar and pharmacological agents also lack strong supportive evidence for their use.5 From a paediatric perspective, despite the high incidence of traumatic brain injury in young children, not to mention their greater life expectancy, there has been a marked paucity of any similar studies. The biggest was a pilot study published over a decade ago in 27 children aged 12 months or older admitted over a 7-year period which used a different technique, bitemporal craniectomy, and found that outcome at 6 months might be improved.6 No long-term follow-up has been published and no similar studies have been performed since.4 While it might be reasonable to await results of studies in adults, it can also be argued that a young child's brain may respond differently to injury for both anatomical and physiological reasons.4 Although the effects of acute management strategies often remain unproven, some evidence is available for adults, and to a much lesser extent for children, showing benefit from rehabilitation.5, 7 At present then in a logical world as much research should be devoted to methods of rehabilitation as to perhaps more glamorous acute interventions. Finally, the outcome of severe injury is well documented but the possible effects of mild head injuries in young children remain less clear and in view of their newly recognized high incidence this needs more work too.
Read full abstract