Concussion Research Articles

Hypotension and Adverse Outcomes in Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

ImportanceTraumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Hypotension in patients with TBI is associated with poorer outcomes. A comprehensive review examining adverse outcomes of hypotension in patients with TBI is needed.ObjectiveTo investigate the mortality and incidence of hypotension in patients with TBI.Data SourcesA search of studies published before April 2024 was conducted using MEDLINE, MEDLINE In Process, ePubs, Embase, Classic+Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for primary research articles in English, including randomized control trials, quasirandomized studies, prospective cohorts, retrospective studies, longitudinal studies, and cross-sectional surveys.Study SelectionInclusion criteria were patients aged at least 10 years with moderate to severe TBI with hypotension. The exclusion criteria were mild TBI (due to the differences in management principles from moderate to severe TBI). Data were screened using Covidence software with multiple reviewers.Data Extraction and SynthesisThis meta-analysis conforms to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) reporting guidelines for assessing data quality and validity. Primary outcomes (unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios [ORs]) were calculated using a random-effect model with 95% CIs. Incidence of hypotension was derived using logit transformation.Main Outcomes and MeasuresMain outcomes were association of hypotension with death and/or vegetative state within 6 months and incidence of hypotension. Vegetative state was not reported due to lack of data from included studies. Hypothesis testing occurred before data collection.ResultsThe search strategy identified 17 676 unique articles. The final review included 51 studies (384 329 patients). Pooled analysis of found a significant increase in mortality in patients with hypotension and moderate to severe TBI (crude OR, 3.82; 95% CI, 3.04-4.81; P < .001; I2 = 96.98%; adjusted OR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.96-2.51; P < .001; I2 = 92.21%). The overall hypotension incidence was 18% (95% CI, 12%-26%) (P < .001; I2 = 99.84%).Conclusions and RelevanceThis meta-analysis of nearly 400 000 patients with TBI found a significant association of greater than 2-fold odds of mortality in patients with hypotension and TBI. This comprehensive analysis can guide future management recommendations, specifically with respect to blood pressure threshold management to reduce deaths when treating patients with TBI.

Validating the Brain Injury Guidelines in a Pediatric Population with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Intracranial Injury at a Level I Trauma Center.

Children with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and intracranial injury (ICI) often receive unnecessary imaging and hospital admission, leading to avoidable burdens on patients and health systems. While most of these patients do not develop critical neurological injuries, identifying those at risk would allow for a more optimal determination of the appropriate level of initial emergency care. The Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) were developed as a triage tool to identify adult patients with mTBI and ICI who can benefit from repeat imaging, hospital admission, or neurosurgical consultation. Here, we sought to validate BIG in children at a Level I trauma center and determine if the BIG algorithm can accurately identify which patients with mTBI/ICI have critical neurosurgical injuries. We hypothesize that the BIG can identify critical neurological injuries more accurately than the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) alone and that more severe injury according to BIG is associated with worse patient outcome. We retrospectively reviewed TBI admissions at a single center (2017-2023) using an institutional registry. Patients included (0-17 years) had an initial head computerized tomography scan with ICI and a GCS of 14-15. Patients were retrospectively classified into the BIG categories (BIG 1, 2, or 3). Medical records were reviewed to identify clinically important TBI (ciTBI): death, neurological deterioration, neurosurgical intervention, intubation >24 h, or hospital admission >48 h due to TBI. Repeat imaging studies obtained were evaluated for progression of injury. The incidence of clinically important TBI (ciTBI) and imaging progression were recorded and compared across BIG categories. Outcomes were evaluated using the Glasgow Outcome Score Extended (GOS-E) 6 months after injury. Univariable and chi-square tests were used to analyze comparisons. Overall, 804 subjects were included in the analysis of which 551 (68.5%) were transfers. Overall, 175 (21.8%) patients had a BIG 1, 402 (50.0%) a BIG 2, and 227 (28.2%) a BIG 3 injury. CiTBI occurred among 64 (8.0%) patients overall, and in 1 (0.6%), 4 (1.0%), and 59 (26.0%) of the BIG 1, 2, and 3 injuries (p < 0.0001). Progression on repeat imaging associated with neurological decline, neurosurgical intervention or resulting in additional evaluation was noted in 0 (0%), 2 (0.5%), and 41 (18.0%) of the BIG 1, 2, and 3 injuries (p < 0.001). Amongst 471 patients (58.6%) with available 6-month patient outcomes, 98% had a GOS-E ≥5 and no outcome difference between BIG categories was observed. Risk stratification of mild TBI using BIG allowed for reasonable identification of children who subsequently develop ciTBI, suggesting that BIG classification can aid in triage and management of patients who might benefit from neurosurgical consultation, repeat imaging, and potentially transfer to a dedicated trauma center. More severe injury according to BIG was not associated with a worse patient outcome.

Systematic vitamin K antagonist reversal with prothrombin complex concentrate in patients with mild traumatic brain injury: randomized controlled trial

Background and importance Traumatic brain injury (TBI) in patients on vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) is linked to a high rate of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Rapid reversal can reduce ICH progression and mortality, but its effectiveness depends on the time between bleeding onset and coagulation normalization. Objective The PREVACT study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of prompt systematic reversal of anticoagulation in patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) for recent mild-TBI while receiving a VKA. Intervention A randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint clinical trial was conducted in 21 French EDs. Patients receiving a VKA, having experienced a TBI within the last 6 h, and presenting a Glasgow Coma Score ≥13 were included. Patients were randomized to systematic immediate VKA reversal with 25 IU/kg of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4f-PCC) before any investigation (intervention group) or standard-of-care signifying reversal only if the initial cranial computed tomography (CT) scan indicated ICH (control group). The primary outcome was the rate of ICH detected on a cranial CT scan 24 h post-inclusion. Results The study was prematurely stopped for logistic reasons after the randomization of 202 patients (101 and 101 in the intervention and control groups, respectively, mean age 90; 51.8% female). On the 24-h cranial CT scan, 6 of 98 patients (6.1%) in the intervention group manifested ICH vs. 12 of 99 patients (12.1%) in the control group [odds ratio: 0.47 (95% confidence interval: 0.14–1.44); P = 0.215]. Conclusion In patients with recent mild-TBI receiving a VKA, systematic prompt reversal with 4f-PCC did not statistically significantly reduce ICH rate at 24 h. However, the study was prematurely stopped and does not exclude a clinically relevant benefit of the strategy tested. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01961804).

Anatomic Interpretability in Neuroimage Deep Learning: Saliency Approaches for Typical Aging and Traumatic Brain Injury.

The black box nature of deep neural networks (DNNs) makes researchers and clinicians hesitant to rely on their findings. Saliency maps can enhance DNN explainability by suggesting the anatomic localization of relevant brain features. This study compares seven popular attribution-based saliency approaches to assign neuroanatomic interpretability to DNNs that estimate biological brain age (BA) from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Cognitively normal (CN) adults (N = 13,394, 5,900 males; mean age: 65.82 ± 8.89years) are included for DNN training, testing, validation, and saliency map generation to estimate BA. To study saliency robustness to the presence of anatomic deviations from normality, saliency maps are also generated for adults with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI, = 214, 135 males; mean age: 55.3 ± 9.9years). We assess saliency methods' capacities to capture known anatomic features of brain aging and compare them to a surrogate ground truth whose anatomic saliency is known a priori. Anatomic aging features are identified most reliably by the integrated gradients method, which outperforms all others through its ability to localize relevant anatomic features. Gradient Shapley additive explanations, input × gradient, and masked gradient perform less consistently but still highlight ubiquitous neuroanatomic features of aging (ventricle dilation, hippocampal atrophy, sulcal widening). Saliency methods involving gradient saliency, guided backpropagation, and guided gradient-weight class attribution mapping localize saliency outside the brain, which is undesirable. Our research suggests the relative tradeoffs of saliency methods to interpret DNN findings during BA estimation in typical aging and after mTBI.

The vague language use scale: Clinical utility and psychometrics from adults with traumatic brain injury.

Pragmatic communication difficulties encompass many distinct behaviours, including the use of vague and/or insufficient language, a common characteristic following traumatic brain injury (TBI) that negatively impacts psychosocial outcomes. Existing assessments evaluate pragmatic communication broadly, often with only one or two items capturing each behaviour, thus limiting sensitivity and precision to variations within each behaviour. Given that greater nuance is needed to detect subtle pragmatic communication differences and investigate underlying cognitive mechanisms, a more refined measure is critical to improve psychosocial outcomes. The Vague scale was developed to address those needs. To provide preliminary evidence supporting the novel Vague language use (Vague) scale's reliability, validity and clinical utility. The Vague scale rates each discourse sample utterance for vague language use on a 3-point scale; the measure's Vague score represents the mean of utterance-level ratings. Using the Vague scale, two raters naïve to diagnosis evaluated Cinderella narratives of 46 adults with severe TBI and 46 controls with no brain injury, providing reliability, construct validity and classification accuracy evidence. Vague scores were also compared to other clinical measures to gather criterion-related validity evidence. Interrater agreement across all transcripts was moderate. Construct validity was supported by expected group differences and criterion validation, including significant relationships with increased violations of Grice's maxim of quantity and measures of lexical variation; significant relationships with psychosocial outcomes, supporting clinical utility; and nonsignificant relationships with measures of syntax and overall pragmatic communication. Classification accuracy expectedly did not support using Vague scores in isolation for diagnosis, due to unacceptable sensitivity (0.696). Evidence supported the Vague scores' psychometric properties. Thus, the Vague scale shows promise as a measure of one distinct pragmatic communication behaviour: vague language use. Future research should apply the Vague scale to determine its sensitivity in individuals with subtle social communication challenges (e.g., mild TBI), explore its utility with more naturalistic discourse samples as part of a pragmatic communication battery, longitudinally examine changes in Vague scores, and investigate cognitive mechanisms underlying this specific pragmatic communication behaviour. What is already known on this subject Use of vague language is common following traumatic brain injury (TBI) and may contribute to negative psychosocial outcomes related to employment and relationships. However, existing measures of vague language lack sensitivity and precision, limiting their utility for identifying subtle performance variations or determining the cognitive mechanisms underlying this specific pragmatic communication behaviour. What this study adds to existing knowledge The current study gathered promising reliability, validity and clinical utility evidence to support using the novel Vague language use (Vague) scale, which was developed to address these limitations. Based on complex (Cinderella) stories of adults with and without TBI, Vague scores demonstrated moderate interrater agreement and promising construct validity based on expected group differences and criterion validation, including moderate associations with related constructs and weak associations with unrelated constructs. Because pragmatic communication profiles post-TBI can vary, classification accuracy expectedly indicated that Vague scores should not be used alone to identify communication differences post-TBI. What are the clinical implications of this work? Vague scores show promise for documenting clients' use of vague language and planning intervention to address associated discourse-level challenges. Future research should investigate applying the Vague scale to naturalistic discourse samples (1) as part of a battery that sensitively and precisely identifies pragmatic communication differences and (2) as a tool for investigating cognitive mechanisms underlying vague language use, with the goal of improving interventions that support pragmatic communication and enhance psychosocial outcomes.

Peri-injury symptomatology as predictors of brain computed tomography (CT) scan abnormalities in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI)

ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify predictors of brain CT abnormalities in patients who sustained a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).MethodsRetrospective observational cohort of adult patients with mTBI (Glasgow Coma Score 13–15) that occurred within the preceding 24 h.Results2548 (91%) of the cohort had a brain CT and 698 (27%) demonstrated abnormal findings. The most frequently observed CT abnormalities were bleeding (638, 25%) and fractures (190, 7.4%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed several significant predictors associated with the presence of brain CT abnormalities including older age [P < 0.0001], male sex [P < 0.0001], loss of consciousness [P = 0.0041], associated vomiting [P = 0.0011], alteration of consciousness (AOC) [P = 0102], and GCS score [P < 0.0001]. This was a robust model with an R² of 14.2%.ConclusionIn this retrospective analysis, older age, male sex, the presence of loss of consciousness or alteration in consciousness, lower GCS score, and associated vomiting were found to be significant predictors of having an abnormal brain CT. These findings highlight the importance of considering these factors when determining the necessity of brain CT scans in patients with mTBI and suggest that existing clinical decision rules may be limited. These findings may also help to inform clinical decision rules. Early identification of individuals at a higher risk of CT abnormalities may assist in appropriate management and allocation of healthcare resources.

Utilisation of New Zealand Rugby's concussion management pathway: A mixed methods investigation.

Concerns around concussion highlight the need for strategies to improve the implementation and translation of concussion guidelines in community sports. This study assessed players' utilisation and compliance with New Zealand Rugby's Concussion Management Pathway (CMP). This pragmatic, mixed methods study comprised of concussion injury surveillance and mapping of players' healthcare touchpoints through the CMP. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to understand stakeholders' experiences. Over the season, 27 different healthcare pathways were identified with 28% of players progressing through all phases of the CMP (ideal pathway). Of the 206 suspected concussions reported over the season, 70% were logged in the CMP phone App, and 89% of these had an associated valid baseline concussion assessment. Prior to returning to contact training, 64% of players obtained a medical clearance. One theme, 'belief in the value of pathway' was identified as a facilitator across all CMP components. Themes such as 'concussion knowledge and the nature of concussion'; 'communication between stakeholders and sufficient information on the process'; and 'strong relationships and clarity around responsibilities' were identified as facilitators across several pathway components. Other facilitators included 'ease and timing of general practitioner access'; 'the phone App as facilitator to logging'; and 'spotting for concussion as a team'. Additionally, the findings signify baseline testing as a potential pre-cursor to overall CMP compliance. Strategies that support the facilitators identified in this study may further enhance compliance.

Comparison of three different ice hockey helmets using an ice hockey specific test protocol

Although there are currently no standard tests measuring rotational head motion for ice hockey, researchers have proposed test methods which induce rotational head motion from an impact and may reflect more closely how concussions occur in the sport. Recently, Meehan et al. developed a test method for ice hockey helmets to represent concussive injuries associated with ice hockey. While that provided a method that used impact parameters closer to what may be experienced, the research did not evaluate if different helmets would produce differing results under those loading conditions. The purpose of this study is to use the methods developed by Meehan et al. to evaluate the protective capacity of three different ice hockey helmet designs. This research used monorail drop rig and pneumatic ram systems to follow the protocol of Meehan with a bare headform condition and three different helmet designs, allowing for differences in linear and rotational acceleration, rotational velocity, and maximum principal strain to be determined. The results of this research found that the test method developed by Meehan et al. does result in significant differences between different helmets and helmet designs under identical impact conditions. However, these differences were limited which may be a reflection of the test method as well as commonality in terms of how ice hockey helmets are designed; the different models may not be sufficiently different enough to provide different results under these loading conditions.

Mechanisms of Injury for Traumatic Brain Injury Among U.S. Military Service Members Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

To understand the mechanisms of injury and demographic risk factors associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients among active and reserve service members in the U.S. Military before and during the COVID-10 pandemic. Active and reserve service members diagnosed with an incident TBI from January 2019 through September 2021 were selected. Traumatic brain injury patients diagnosed before March 1, 2020 were categorized as pre-COVID (PC), and patients diagnosed on or after March 1, 2020 were categorized as the intra-COVID (IC) group, aligning closely with the date when the World Health Organization officially proclaimed the pandemic. We determined the frequency of causes of injuries associated with TBI separate by sex, age, occupation, and TBI severity. In addition, we conducted multivariate logistic regression analyses to assess the demographic risk factors associated with TBI severity during the PC and IC eras. Our cohort included 48,562 TBI patients: 22,819 (47.0%) diagnosed during the PC era and 25,743 (53.0%) diagnosed during the IC era. The major mechanisms of injury within our TBI cohort were being struck by/against objects, falls/slips/trips, and motor vehicle traffic accidents before and during the pandemic. The most common causes of TBI were not impacted by COVID, but motor vehicle accidents did increase during the IC era. The mechanisms of injury associated with TBI differed by TBI severity: being struck by or against an object caused more mild and moderate TBI; motor vehicle accidents caused more severe TBI; and firearms was a major cause of penetrating TBI. In addition, the percentage of severe TBI because of firearms rose sharply during the IC era. Further, women were more likely to be diagnosed with mild TBI compared to men. Military leaders should consider how different causes of injury are associated with differing TBI severities and how certain demographic groups were vulnerable to specific TBI severities when developing injury prevention programs.

Effect of Chiropractic Intervention on Oculomotor and Attentional Visual Outcomes in Young Adults With Long-Term Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial

ObjectiveThis study aimed to establish if chiropractic care can improve oculomotor and cognitive symptoms in individuals with persistent postconcussion syndrome (PPCS). MethodsA single-blind, randomized controlled intervention study recorded baseline computerized eye-tracker assessment (CEA) outcomes in 40 young adults with PPCS following mild traumatic brain injury. Participants were randomly allocated to either a chiropractic or age-matched active control intervention, and the change in CEA outcomes following intervention was compared between the chiropractic and control groups. A battery of CEAs including egocentric localization, fixation stability, pursuit, saccades, Stroop, and the vestibulo-ocular reflex, were used to assess oculomotor function, visual attention/processing, and selective attention. ResultsRelative to the control group, participants receiving the chiropractic intervention scored better in the Stroop test (P < .001), had improved gaze stability during both vestibulo-ocular reflex (P < .001) and fixation stability (P = .009), and a lower vertical error in egocentric localization (P < .001). However, performance was poorer in pursuits, where they had an increased tracking error (P < .001). ConclusionChiropractic care in participants with PPCS significantly improved static and dynamic gaze stability, and performance in the Stroop test, compared with a control intervention. These results suggest that chiropractic care can offer a novel avenue for alleviating certain visual and cognitive symptoms in patients with PPCS. It also adds to the growing evidence that suggests that some longstanding PPCS visual symptoms may have a spinal or proprioceptive basis.

Return to Play Guidelines in Pediatric Concussion: A Systematic Review of Current Literature.

Pediatric concussions, particularly in youth sports, are a significant public health concern, with up to 18% of children experiencing one by age 17. Return-to-play (RTP) guidelines aim to protect athletes from the adverse effects of repeated injuries, but these protocols vary widely based on factors such as age, sport, and geography. This review synthesizes current literature on RTP guidelines for pediatric concussions to provide evidence-based recommendations. A systematic search of PubMed was conducted using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms "return to play," "pediatric concussion," and "mild traumatic brain injury." Studies published between January 2000 and December 2023 were included if they focused on RTP protocols for children aged 5 to 17. After screening 60 articles, 45 were selected for review. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. RTP protocols showed significant variability influenced by age, gender, and sport type. Common themes included initial rest followed by a gradual return to activity. Female athletes generally required longer recovery periods. Multidisciplinary care and early therapeutic interventions, such as vestibular therapy, were associated with better outcomes and faster recovery. There is a need for standardized, evidence-based RTP guidelines to address inconsistencies in concussion management. Future research should focus on creating universally applicable protocols, with attention to gender, sport-specific factors, and early intervention to improve recovery outcomes for young athletes.

MicroRNA Biomarkers on Day of Injury Among Patients with Post Concussive Symptoms at 28-Days: A Prospective Cohort Study.

After mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), some patients experience symptoms that persist for weeks to months. Recovery from mTBI is primarily assessed using selfreported symptom questionnaires. Blood biomarkers, including microRNA species, have shown promise to assist diagnosis of mTBI, however, little is known about how blood microRNA measures might predict symptom recovery. The aim of this study was to investigate the variances in plasma microRNAs on the day of injury between individuals with mTBI who report post-concussive symptoms at the 28- day mark and those who do not. Patients who presented to an adult, tertiary referral hospital emergency department on the day of the injury and were diagnosed with isolated mTBI (n=35) were followed up for 28 days. Venous blood samples were collected and symptom severity was assessed using the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptom Questionnaire (RPQ) on the day of injury and at 28 days. Patients who reported ongoing symptoms of total RPQ score ≥10 or at least one symptom severity ≥2, were compared to those with lesser symptom severity or symptom resolution. There were 9 (25.7%; 95%CI: 12.5-43.3) patients who reported persistent symptoms. Day of injury plasma miR-223-3p levels were significantly higher in individuals with ongoing symptoms compared to those without, however, no such differences were observed for miRs 142- 3p, 423-3p, 32-5p, 144-3p, and let-7f-5p. Acute plasma miR-223-3p levels appear to detect patients who later have persistent symptoms after mTBI. The results demonstrate the potential utility for such biomarkers to assist in decisions towards early referral for therapy after mTBI.

Convergence insufficiency as a predictor of poor prognosis after acute mild traumatic brain injury

BackgroundMild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is becoming a more common emergency department (ED) presentation. Towards this end, many types of testing in the acute setting are being investigated. One of these is screening for convergence insufficiency (CI) symptoms. These are common problems reported by patients with mTBI, but such oculomotor testing is rarely performed in the ED.ObjectiveTo assess the feasibility of convergence insufficiency screening in the ED and investigate whether CI is associated with adverse events such as post-concussive symptoms or hospital admission.MethodsWritten informed consent was obtained from patients age 18 years or older who experienced a mild head injury from any mechanism resulting in an mTBI. Patients underwent screening for CI symptoms using a standardized instrument of 15 questions, known as the convergence insufficiency symptom survey (CISS), with responses based on the Likert scale. These data were correlated to outcomes of hospital admission, occurrence of post-concussive symptoms, and 30-day hospital re-admission.ResultsA total of 116 patients were prospectively enrolled, of which 58 were male. The median age was 31 years, with a range of 18 to 95 years of age. The median CISS score was 13, with an interquartile range (IQR) of 6 to 21 and an overall range of 0 to 53. Females presented with a median CISS score of 14, which was higher compared to the male median score of 10. The higher the CISS score, the more likely the patient was to be admitted to the hospital (p = 0.0378), develop symptoms of post-concussive syndrome at 30-day follow up (p = 0.0322), and be readmitted within 30 days (p = 0.0098).ConclusionsScreening for CI symptoms using the CISS can be a solid adjunct in the evaluation of mTBI in the ED. The CISS is easy and fast to administer, and it is a useful tool to stratify patients in terms of who is at the highest risk of developing complications related to the mTBI.

Time to Ring in the Body Checking, Head Contact, and Suspected Injury Rates in Youth Ringette: A Video-Analysis Study in Youth Ringette and Female Ice Hockey.

To compare physical contacts (PCs), including head contacts (HCs), suspected concussion, and nonconcussion injury incidence rates between youth ringette and female ice hockey. Cross-sectional. Alberta ice arenas. Players participating in 8 U16AA (ages 14-15 years) ringette and 8 U15AA (ages 13-14 years) female ice hockey games during the 2021 to 2022 season. Dartfish video-analysis software was used to analyze video recordings. Univariate Poisson regression analyses (adjusted for cluster by team-game, offset by game minutes) were used to estimate PCs (including HCs) and suspected injury (concussion and nonconcussion) and concussion-specific IRs and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) to compare sports. Proportions of all PCs that were body checks (level 4-5 trunk PC) and direct HCs (HC1) penalized were reported. Ringette had a 2.6-fold higher rate of body checking compared with hockey (IRR = 2.63, 95% CI: 1.59-4.37). Ringette also had a 2-fold higher rate of HC1 compared with hockey (IRR = 2.08, 95% CI: 1.37-3.16). A 3.4-fold higher rate of suspected injury was found in ringette (IRR = 3.37, 95% CI: 1.40-8.15). There was no significant difference in suspected concussion IRs in ringette compared with hockey (IRR = 1.93, 95% CI: 0.43-8.74). Despite being prohibited in both sports, only a small proportion of body checks (Ringette = 18%; Hockey = 17%) and HC1 (Ringette = 6%; Hockey = 6%) were penalized. Higher rates of body checking, HC1, and suspected injuries were found in ringette compared with female ice hockey. Body checking and HC1 were rarely penalized, despite rules disallowing them in both sports. Future research should consider other youth age groups.

Perceptual Response Training for Reduction of Injury Risk Among High School Girls’ Soccer Players

Background/Objectives: Neural processes involved in visual detection, decision-making, and motor plan execution are believed to play a key role in the avoidance of sport-related injuries, but very little evidence exists to guide the development of training activities for the optimization of brain function. Immersive virtual reality provides a means to precisely measure the amount of time that elapses from visual stimulus presentation to the initiation of a motor response (i.e., perceptual latency) or its completion (i.e., response time). Methods: The median value of a metric quantifying both the speed and accuracy (i.e., the rate correct per second of response time) of 50 high school female soccer players was used to assign those who exhibited suboptimal performance to a training program. Training sessions required less than 5 min and the number of sessions completed over a 7-week period ranged from 3 to 13 (median = 5). Results: Among 42 players available for follow-up assessment at 8 weeks after the first practice session (training n = 19; comparison n = 23), the results of regression-discontinuity analyses demonstrated statistically significant differences (p &lt; 0.05) for metrics representing fast/accurate movement initiation (i.e., the rate correct score for perceptual latency, p = 0.016) and across-trial consistency (i.e., perceptual latency variability, p = 0.027). From the first practice session to the end of the soccer season, 12 injuries were sustained by 10 players (four concussions and eight musculoskeletal injuries). A time-to-event analysis demonstrated strong associations with perceptual latency variability ≥ 0.143 (Hazard Ratio = 15.43, p = 0.011) and a lifetime history of at least one concussion (Hazard Ratio = 8.84, p = 0.008). Conclusions: The strong association of movement initiation consistency with the avoidance of concussion or musculoskeletal injury suggests that the training program may have a highly beneficial far-transfer effect.

Long-term neurocognitive follow-up in children with traumatic brain injury: A literature review and monocentric cohort study

Children with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) may experience long-term cognitive sequelae. However, previous study results have been controversial. It remains unclear whether clinical follow-up is useful, how long patients should be followed-up, and which psychological dimensions should be investigated. Herein, we described neurocognitive evolution in a small sample of Italian children who were hospitalized for mTBI and systematically reviewed the existing evidence in this setting. In total, 15 children aged 4 &amp;ndash; 16 (median, 9) years who were evaluated for mTBI at our institution between March 2017 and September 2018 were retrospectively enrolled. All patients underwent computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging for clinical reasons; moreover, they underwent neurocognitive evaluation within few days from the event (T0), after 3 &amp;ndash; 6 months (T1), and after 18 &amp;ndash; 24 months (T2). Neuropsychological assessment included the Child Behavior Checklist, Developmental Neuropsychology Assessment II Edition, and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. An electronic search was conducted to identify studies published in the past 12 years. Neurocognitive assessments revealed low scores in memory, sensorimotor, and social perception tasks at T1 and T2. Univariate analysis of neuroradiological and clinical findings revealed no risk factors for cognitive deficits. Overall, 17 studies involving 1336 children were reviewed and analyzed. Following mTBI, psychiatric disorders were frequently newly diagnosed and were associated with significant deficits in adaptive functioning and other pre-injury psychosocial risk factors. Our study findings demonstrate that children with mTBI exhibit subtle persistent cognitive difficulties that may affect academic and social functioning. Thus, follow-up using extensive neuropsychological evaluation is essential.

Goal-Oriented Attentional Self-Regulation Training in Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury is Linked to Microstructural Plasticity in Prefrontal White Matter.

Impaired attention is one of the most common, debilitating, and persistent consequences of traumatic brain injury (TBI), which impacts overall cognitive and executive functions in these patients. Previous neuroimaging studies, trying to understand the neural mechanism underlying attention impairment post TBI, have highlighted the role of prefrontal white matter tracts in attentional functioning in mild TBI (mTBI). Goal-Oriented Attentional Self-Regulation (GOALS) is a cognitive rehabilitation training program that targets executive control functions in participants by applying mindfulness-based attention regulation and goal management strategies. GOALS training has been demonstrated to improve attention and executive functioning in patients with chronic TBI. However, its impact on microstructural integrity of attention-associated prefrontal white matter tracts is still unclear. Here, using diffusion magnetic resonance imaging in a pilot randomized controlled trial, we investigated the effect of GOALS training on prefrontal white matter microstructure in 19 U.S. military veterans with chronic mTBI, compared with a matched control group of 14 veterans with chronic mTBI who received standard of care brain health education. We also tested for an association between microstructural white matter changes and sustained attention ability in these patients pre- and post-GOALS training. Our results show significantly better white matter microstructural integrity in left and right anterior corona radiata (ACR) in the GOALS group compared with the control group post-training. Moreover, we found a significant correlation between sustained attention ability of GOALS training participants and white matter integrity of their right ACR pre- and post-training. Finally, our findings indicated that the improved white matter integrity of the ACR in GOALS training participants was the result of increased neurite density and decreased fiber orientation dispersion within this tract.

Head injuries in prehospital and Emergency Department settings: a prospective multicenter cross-sectional study in France

BackgroundHead injuries are the leading cause of trauma in Emergency Departments (EDs). Recent studies have shown epidemiological changes in patients consulting ED for head injuries. The main objective of this study was to describe the profile of head injury patients consulting in the EDs in France and assess i) head injury severity across age groups; ii) the delay between the occurrence of head injury and ED arrival; iii) factors associated with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH).MethodsThis cross-sectional study collected patient data over a three-day period in March 2023. All adult patients (≥ 18 years old) admitted to the ED with a head injury (defined as a trauma to the head) were included. TBI severity was classified according to patients’ initial Glasgow Coma Scale score in the ED: severe (3–8); moderate (9 -12); mild (13–15); and simple head trauma in the absence of transient or persistent neurological symptoms.ResultsAmong the 71 participating EDs, 26,008 patients visited EDs and a total of 1070 patients (4.1%, IC 95 3.9—4.4) presented a head injury were included in the study, with a median age of 68.5 [37–85] years old. Most of the patients (66.7%) were referred to ED after a call to the Emergency Medical Dispatcher (EMD). The median time from head injury to ED visit was 2 h [1.0 – 5.5]. Ground-level falls were the leading cause of head injury (60.3%). Most of patient presented a simple head trauma (n = 715, 66.8%) followed by mild TBI (n = 337, 31.5%). CT head scans were performed for 636 patients (59.6%), of which 58 were positive. Traumatic ICH prevalence was 5.4% (95% CI: 4.1–6.9) and three patients (0.3%) required an urgent neurosurgical intervention. Neither preinjury anticoagulant (p = 0.97) nor antiplatelet (p = 0.93) use was associated with an increased risk of traumatic ICH.ConclusionsOne head injury patient out of two presenting in the ED is aged over 65 years. Patients referred by EMD were more likely to visit ED promptly. The majority of older patients underwent a head CT scan and preinjury anticoagulant use was not associated with increased risk of traumatic ICH.

Low-Value Clinical Practices in Pediatric Trauma Care

Reducing low-value care has the potential to improve patient experiences and outcomes and decrease the unnecessary use of health care resources. Research suggests that low-value practices (ie, the potential for harm exceeds the potential for benefit) in adult trauma care are frequent and subject to interhospital variation; evidence on low-value practices in pediatric trauma care is lacking. To estimate the incidence of low-value practices in pediatric trauma care and evaluate interhospital practice variation. A retrospective multicenter cohort study in a Canadian provincial trauma system was conducted. Children younger than 16 years admitted to any of the 59 provincial trauma centers from April 1, 2016, to March 31, 2022, were included. Low-value practices were identified from systematic reviews of clinical practice guidelines on pediatric trauma. The frequencies of low-value practices were evaluated by estimating incidence proportions and cases per 1000 admissions (low if ≤10% and ≤10 cases, moderate if >10% or >10 cases, and high if >10% and >10 cases) were identified. Interhospital variation with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were assessed (low if <5%, moderate if 5%-20%, and high if >20%). A total of 10 711 children were included (mean [SD] age, 7.4 [4.9] years; 6645 [62%] boys). Nineteen low-value practices on imaging, fluid resuscitation, hospital/intensive care unit admission, specialist consultation, deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis, and surgical management of solid organ injuries were identified. Of these, 14 (74%) could be evaluated using trauma registry data. Five practices had moderate to high frequencies and interhospital variation: head computed tomography in low-risk children (7.1%; 33 per 1000 admissions; ICC, 8.6%), pretransfer computed tomography in children with a clear indication for transfer (67.6%; 4 per 1000 admissions; ICC, 5.7%), neurosurgical consultation in children without clinically important intracranial lesions (11.6%; 13 per 1000 admissions; ICC, 15.8%), hospital admission in isolated mild traumatic brain injury (38.8%; 98 per 1000 admissions; ICC, 12.4%), and hospital admission in isolated minor blunt abdominal trauma (10%; 5 per 1000 admissions; ICC, 31%). In this cohort study, low-value practices appeared to be frequent and subject to interhospital variation. These practices may represent priority targets for deimplementation interventions, particularly as they can be measured using routinely collected data.

A Combination of Low Doses of Lithium and Valproate Improves Cognitive Outcomes after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

The prevalence of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is high compared with moderate and severe TBI, comprising almost 80% of all brain injuries. mTBI activates a complex cascade of biochemical, molecular, structural, and pathological changes that can result in neurological and cognitive impairments. These impairments can manifest even in the absence of overt brain damage. Given the complexity of changes triggered by mTBI, a combination of drugs that target multiple TBI-activated cascades may be required to improve mTBI outcomes. It has been previously demonstrated that cotreatment with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs lithium plus valproate (Li + VPA) for 3 weeks after a moderate-to-severe controlled cortical impact injury reduced cortical tissue loss and improved motor function. Since both lithium and valproate can exhibit toxicity at high doses, it would be beneficial to determine if this combination treatment is effective when administered at low doses and for a shorter duration, and if it can improve cognitive function, after a mild diffuse TBI. In the present study, we tested if the combination of low doses of lithium (1 mEq/kg or 0.5 mEq/kg) plus valproate (20 mg/kg) administered for 3 days after a mild fluid percussion injury can improve hippocampal-dependent learning and memory. Our data show that the combination of low-dose Li + VPA improved spatial learning and memory, effects not seen when either drug was administered alone. In addition, postinjury Li + VPA treatment improved recognition memory and sociability and reduced fear generalization. Postinjury Li + VPA also reduced the number of anti-ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1 (Iba1)-positive microglia counted using a convolutional neural network, indicating a reduction in neuroinflammation. These findings indicate that low-dose Li + VPA administered acutely after mTBI may have translational utility to reduce pathology and improve cognitive function.