BRAFV600E mCRC Research Articles

Updated results from ERAS-007 plus encorafenib and cetuximab (EC) in patients (pts) with EC-naïve metastatic BRAF V600E colorectal cancer (CRC) in the phase 1b/2 HERKULES-3 study.

3517 Background: The RAS/MAPK pathway (including BRAF) is dysregulated in a broad range of cancers including CRC, resulting in downstream activation of ERK1/2. Patients (pts) with metastatic CRC with BRAF V600E mutation (BRAF V600E mCRC) have dramatically poorer survival rates than those with non-BRAF V600E mutated CRC, highlighting the need for novel therapies. The combination of a BRAF plus EGFR inhibitor is approved for the treatment of pts with BRAF V600E mCRC; however, objective response occurs in only 20% of pts. ERAS-007 is a novel, potent, and orally bioavailable inhibitor of ERK. ERAS-007 alone or in combination with encorafenib and cetuximab (EC) showed promising in vitro and in vivo activity in BRAF V600E CRC models, supporting investigation of the potential clinical benefit of ERAS-007 + EC in pts with BRAF V600E mCRC. Methods: HERKULES-3 is a Phase 1b/2 study to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary clinical activity of ERAS-007 combinations targeting the MAPK pathway in pts with advanced GI cancers. Within this study, we are currently evaluating the safety, tolerability, PK, and preliminary clinical activity of the combination of ERAS-007 + EC in pts with EC-naïve BRAF V600E CRC. Results: As of 30 November 2023, 19 (EC-naïve and EC-pretreated) pts have been dosed with ERAS-007 100 mg twice daily-once a week (BID-QW) in combination with EC (300 mg oral daily + 500 mg/m2 intravenous infusion every 2 weeks). The treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) occurring in ≥25% of pts were dermatitis acneiform (52.6%); nausea and fatigue (47.4% each); diarrhea (42.1%); constipation, headache, and hematuria (31.6% each); and vomiting, anemia, and infusion-related reaction (26.3% each). There were no Grade 4 TEAEs. One pt suffered a Grade 5 unrelated event of respiratory failure. There were no Grade 3 treatment-related AEs that occurred in more than 1 pt. There were no ERAS-007-related AEs that led to discontinuation of ERAS-007. Of the 19 pts, 11 were EC naïve and 10 of 11 were efficacy evaluable. In the EC naïve efficacy evaluable pts, the ORR was 40% with 3 of the 4 responses confirmed. The maximum duration of response is > 15 months; updated data will be presented. Conclusions: ERAS-007 100 mg BID-QW in combination with EC was safe and well tolerated with preliminary evidence of promising clinical activity. These results support continued evaluation of this combination in EC naïve pts with BRAF V600E CRC. Clinical trial information: NCT05039177 .

SWOG S2107: Randomized phase II trial of encorafenib and cetuximab with or without nivolumab for patients with previously treated, microsatellite stable, BRAFV600E metastatic and/or unresectable colorectal cancer.

TPS3640 Background: Patients with microsatellite stable (MSS), BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) experience poor survival outcomes. Second-line treatment with the BRAF inhibitor encorafenib (E) and anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab (C) is an approved treatment combination, with overall response rate (ORR) of 20% and median progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.1 months. Anti-PD-1 antibodies like nivolumab (N) are ineffective as monotherapy for patients with MSS, BRAFV600E mCRC. In preclinical models of MSS, BRAFV600E CRC, inhibition of BRAF and EGFR induces loss of expression of mismatch repairs genes and promotes a microsatellite instability-high phenotype, which may prime these tumors for response to immunotherapy. In support of these findings, a single-institution clinical trial of E + C + N for 26 patients with MSS, BRAFV600E mCRC reported an ORR of 50% and median PFS of 7.2 months. We hypothesize that the addition of N to E + C will improve median PFS for patients with MSS, BRAFV600E mCRC. Methods: In this prospective phase II clinical trial (N=84), patients with previously treated MSS, BRAFV600E mCRC are randomized 2:1 into 2 arms, respectively: experimental treatment (E + C + N) or standard treatment (E + C). No prior BRAF, EGFR, or immunotherapy agents are allowed. All patients receive E (300 mg PO daily) and C (500 mg/m2 IV every 14 days), and patients in the experimental arm receive N (480 mg IV every 28 days). The primary endpoint is PFS. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, best overall response, duration of response, and safety/tolerability. Using a one-sided α= .10 and power 80%, we target an improvement in median PFS from 4.2 to 7.3 months (hazard ratio 0.57). Additional patient specimens will be collected for exploratory correlative research. As of 2/2024, 50 of 84 planned participants have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT05308446 .

Real-world evaluation of clinical outcomes and long-term survivors in patients with BRAF-V600E metastatic colorectal cancer.

166 Background: BRAF-V600E mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (BRAF-V600E mCRC) is associated with poor prognosis but confers response to combination BRAF/EGFR blockade. The goal of this study is to evaluate the clinicopathologic features and natural history of BRAF-V600E mCRC in the era prior to combination BRAF/EGFR inhibitors. Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients treated at the Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre with BRAF-V600E mCRC who did not receive combination BRAF/EGFR therapy. Patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer prior to March 31, 2021, were included. Demographic, clinical, pathologic and cancer characteristics were abstracted from electronic medical records. Outcomes of interest included duration of therapy, as a surrogate of progression free survival, and overall survival (OS). Long-term survivor was defined as OS greater than 2 years. Results: 74 patients were included. Median age was 70 years (IQR=61-78), and 39 (53%) patients were female. There were 17 (23%) patients alive at the end of the follow-up period. 31 (42%) patients had poorly differentiated grade and 26 (35%) were mismatch repair deficient (dMMR). Locations of metastases included liver (40, 54%), peritoneum (30, 41%), lung (18, 24%), bone (5, 7%) and brain (5, 7%). Overall, 64 (86%) patients received first line systemic therapy, 19 (26%) second line, and 5 (7%) third line (see Table). Median duration of therapy in the first line was 4.3 months (IQR=2.0-9.6), second line was 2.9 months (IQR=1.4-4.1), and third line 1.0 months (IQR=1.0-1.9). Overall survival in the entire cohort was 13.2 months (IQR=4.6-25.4). Importantly, 21 (28%) patients were long-term survivors, of which 8 (11%) were dMMR. Conclusions: Patients with BRAF-V600E mCRC generally have poor clinical outcomes with traditional systemic therapies. In this study, we identified approximately 25% of patients who are long-term survivors (OS >2 years). This reflects the real-world heterogeneity of clinical outcomes for patients with BRAF-V600E mCRC who did not receive BRAF/EGFR targeted therapy.[Table: see text]

SWOG S2107: Randomized phase II trial of encorafenib and cetuximab with or without nivolumab for patients with previously treated, microsatellite stable, BRAFV600E metastatic and/or unresectable colorectal cancer.

TPS234 Background: Patients with microsatellite stable (MSS), BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) experience poor survival outcomes. Treatment with the BRAF inhibitor encorafenib (E) and anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab (C) is an approved treatment combination, with a reported overall response rate (ORR) of 20% and median progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.1 months. Anti-PD-1 antibodies like nivolumab (N) are ineffective as monotherapy for patients with MSS, BRAFV600E mCRC. In preclinical models of MSS, BRAFV600E CRC, inhibition of BRAF and EGFR induces a loss of expression of mismatch repairs genes and promotes a microsatellite instability-high phenotype, which may prime these tumors for response to immunotherapy. In support of these findings, a single-institution clinical trial of E + C + N for 26 participants with MSS, BRAFV600E mCRC reported an ORR of 50% and median PFS of 7.2 months. We hypothesize that the addition of N to E + C will improve PFS for participants with MSS, BRAFV600E mCRC. Methods: In this prospective phase II clinical trial (N=75), participants with previously treated MSS, BRAFV600E mCRC will be randomized 2:1 into 2 arms, respectively: experimental treatment (E + C + N) or standard treatment (E + C). No prior BRAF, EGFR, or immunotherapy agents are allowed. All participants will receive E (300 mg PO daily) and C (500 mg/m2 IV every 14 days), and participants in the experimental arm will receive N (480 mg IV every 28 days). The primary endpoint is PFS. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, best overall response, duration of response, and safety/tolerability. Using a one-sided α= .10 and power 80%, we target an improvement in median PFS from 4.2 to 7.3 months and a hazard ratio of 0.57. Additional participants specimens will be collected for exploratory correlative research. As of 9/2023, 37 of 75 planned participants have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT05308446 .

Cetuximab as a Key Partner in Personalized Targeted Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Cetuximab, a chimeric IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), has revolutionized personalized treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. This review highlights the mechanism of action, characteristics, and optimal indications for cetuximab in mCRC. Cetuximab has emerged as a pivotal partner for novel therapies in specific molecular subgroups, including BRAF V600E, KRAS G12C, and HER2-altered mCRC. Combining cetuximab with immunotherapy and other targeted agents further expands the therapeutic landscape, offering renewed hope for mCRC patients who face the development of resistance to conventional therapies. Ongoing clinical trials have continued to uncover innovative cetuximab-based treatment strategies, promising a brighter future for mCRC patients. This review provides a comprehensive overview of cetuximab's role and its evolving importance in personalized targeted therapy of mCRC patients, offering valuable insights into the evolving landscape of colorectal cancer treatment.

BRAFV600E Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Perspective from a Patient, a Caregiver, and an Oncologist.

This article has been co-authored by a patient with right-sided BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), his caregiver, and an oncologist. Here the patient and caregiver discuss their personal experiences struggling with cancer, including their fears, expectations, and attitudes as the disease progresses. The oncologist describes how patients with BRAFV600E mCRC are treated and how the management strategy can be balanced to mitigate any side effects. Improved diagnostic techniques and the availability of numerous treatment options, including various chemotherapy schemes and molecular-targeted drugs, can aid rapid implementation of treatment algorithms. The pivotal roles of patients' associations in the general support of patients and those close to them, and in facilitating the link with healthcare professionals, are highlighted in this perspective piece.

Preliminary results from ERAS-007 plus encorafenib and cetuximab (EC) in patients (pts) with metastatic BRAF V600E mutated colorectal cancer (CRC) in HERKULES-3 study: A phase 1b/2 study of agents targeting the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway in pts with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies (GI cancers).

3557 Background: The RAS/MAPK pathway (including BRAF) is dysregulated in a broad range of cancers including CRC, resulting in downstream activation of ERK1/2. Metastatic CRC with BRAF V600E mutation (BRAF V600E mCRC) has dramatically worse survival than non-BRAF V600E mutated CRCs, and novel therapies are needed. ERAS-007 is a novel, potent, and orally bioavailable inhibitor of ERK. The combination of a BRAF plus EGFR inhibitor (EC) is approved for the treatment of pts with BRAF V600E mCRC; however, only 20% of pts experience an objective response. ERAS-007 alone or in combination with EC showed promising in vitro and in vivo activity in BRAF V600E CRC models to support the combinatorial clinical benefit of ERAS-007+EC in BRAF V600E mCRC. Methods: HERKULES-3 is a Phase 1b/2 study to assess the safety, tolerability, PK, and preliminary clinical activity of ERAS-007 combinations targeting the MAPK pathway in pts with advanced GI cancers. Within this study, we are currently evaluating the safety and tolerability of escalating doses of ERAS-007 + EC in pts with BRAF V600E CRC. Prior BRAF inhibitor and EGFR inhibitor treatment is neither required nor excluded to be enrolled in this study. Results: As of 30 November 2022, 12 patients were dosed with ERAS-007 twice daily-once a week (BID-QW) (75 and 100 mg; n = 10) or once daily once a week (QW) (150 mg; n = 2) in combination with EC (300 mg oral daily + 500 mg/m2 intravenous infusion once every 2 weeks). The treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) occurring in ≥20% of pts were fatigue (50%), headache (42%), constipation, diarrhea, nausea, dermatitis acneiform (33% each), and vomiting (25%). No TEAEs led to ERAS-007 discontinuation or death. Grade ≥3 TEAEs were reported in 3 pts (25%). Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs reported in ≥ 2 patients (17%) include hypertension, headache, confusional state, and skin toxicity. Three pts (25%) died due to disease progression. No DLTs were reported. Out of 4 efficacy evaluable EC naïve pts, one confirmed partial response (PR) and one unconfirmed PR were observed. Evaluation of PK is ongoing and preliminary data will be presented. Conclusions: ERAS-007+EC in pts with BRAF V600E CRC shows acceptable preliminary safety/tolerability and evidence of clinical activity. The highest dose of ERAS-007 evaluated and cleared by the safety review committee to date is 100 mg BID-QW when combined with EC. Observed PK, toxicity, and preliminary activity support continued evaluation of this combination in pts with BRAF V600E CRC. Clinical trial information: NCT05039177 .

BREAKWATER safety lead-in (SLI): Encorafenib (E) + cetuximab (C) + chemotherapy for BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

119 Background: Based on the phase 3 BEACON study (NCT02928224), BRAF inhibitor (i) encorafenib (E) + EGFRi cetuximab (C) was approved for the treatment (tx) of previously treated patients (pts) with BRAFV600E mCRC, with mPFS of 4.3 months (mo) and ORR of 19.5%. In the phase 2 ANCHOR study (NCT03693170), mPFS was 5.8 mo and ORR was 48% for 1L EC + binimetinib in BRAFV600E mCRC. To further assess 1L approaches, the ongoing phase 3 BREAKWATER study (NCT04607421) is evaluating EC ± chemotherapy vs standard-of-care chemotherapy in BRAFV600E mCRC. Here, we present updated safety and antitumor activity data as well as biomarker data from the BREAKWATER SLI. Methods: Inclusion criteria for the SLI were BRAFV600E mCRC (blood or tumor tissue), ≤1 prior systemic tx for mCRC, and ECOG PS 0/1. Pts previously treated with BRAFi/EGFRi or both oxaliplatin and irinotecan were excluded. Pts received E 300 mg daily + C 500 mg/m2 every 2 weeks (Q2W) + either mFOLFOX6 Q2W (n=27) or FOLFIRI Q2W (n=30) in 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was frequency of dose-limiting toxicities. Secondary endpoints included safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity. Exploratory endpoints included evaluation of plasma (circulating tumor DNA [ctDNA] genomic profiling) and tumor tissue (molecular profiling) biomarkers. Updated results from the BREAKWATER SLI will be presented, including overall safety and tolerability and antitumor activity. Biomarker data, including changes from baseline in BRAFV600E ctDNA following treatment (Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 15 and Cycle 7 Day 1) and MSI status of pts, will also be presented. Expected conclusions will be included in the final abstract. Clinical trial information: NCT04607421 .

Randomized phase II trial of encorafenib and cetuximab with or without nivolumab for patients with previously treated, microsatellite stable, BRAFV600E metastatic and/or unresectable colorectal cancer: SWOG S2107.

TPS265 Background: Patients with microsatellite stable (MSS), BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) experience poor survival outcomes. Treatment with the BRAF inhibitor encorafenib (E) and anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab (C) is an approved treatment combination, with a reported overall response rate (ORR) of 20% and median progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.1 months. Anti-PD-1 antibodies like nivolumab (N) are ineffective as monotherapy for patients with MSS, BRAFV600E mCRC. In preclinical models of MSS, BRAFV600E CRC, inhibition of BRAF and EGFR induces a loss of expression of mismatch repair genes and promotes a microsatellite instability-high phenotype, which may prime these tumors for response to immunotherapy. In support of these findings, a single-institution clinical trial of E + C + N for 26 patients with MSS, BRAFV600E mCRC reported an ORR of 50% and median PFS of 7.2 months. We hypothesize that the addition of N to E + C will improve median PFS for patients with MSS, BRAFV600E mCRC. Methods: In this prospective phase II clinical trial (N = 75), patients with previously treated MSS, BRAFV600E mCRC will be randomized 2:1 into 2 arms, respectively: experimental treatment (E + C + N) or standard treatment (E + C). No prior BRAF, EGFR, or immunotherapy agents are allowed. All patients will receive E (300 mg PO daily) and C (500 mg/m2 IV every 14 days), and patients in the experimental arm will receive N (480 mg IV every 28 days). The primary endpoint is PFS. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, best overall response, duration of response, and safety/tolerability. Using a one-sided α = .10 and power 80%, we target an improvement in median PFS from 4.2 to 7.3 months and a hazard ratio of 0.57. Additional patient specimens will be collected for exploratory correlative research. The study activated across the United States in June 2022 and as of September 2022 has enrolled 2 of 75 planned participants. Funding: NIH/National Cancer Institute grants U10CA180888, U10CA180819, U10CA180820, U10CA180821, U10CA180868; and in part by The Hope Foundation for Cancer Research STrS award. Clinical trial information: NCT05308446 .

Therapeutic landscape and future direction of metastatic colorectal cancer.

In the era of targeted therapy based on genomic alterations, the treatment strategy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been changing. Before systemic treatment initiation, determination of tumour genomic status for KRAS and NRAS, BRAFV600E mutations, ERBB2, and microsatellite instability and/or mismatch repair (MMR) status is recommended. In patients with deficient MMR and BRAFV600E mCRC, randomized phase III trials have established the efficacy of pembrolizumab as first-line therapy and the combination of encorafenib and cetuximab as second-line or third-line therapy. In addition, new agents have been actively developed in other rare molecular fractions such as ERBB2 alterations and KRASG12C mutations. In March 2022, the combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for ERBB2-positive mCRC was approved in Japan, thereby combining real-world evidence from the SCRUM-Japan Registry. As the populations are highly fragmented owing to rare genomic alterations, various strategies in clinical development are expected. Clinical development of a tumour-agnostic approach, such as NTRK fusion and tumour mutational burden, has successfully introduced corresponding drugs to clinical practice. Considering the difficulty of randomized trials owing to cost-benefit and rarity, a promising solution could be real-world evidence utilized as an external control from the molecular-based disease registry.

Abstract B028: Changes in exosomal RNA expression associate with treatment response to BRAF + EGFR + PD-1 blockade in MSS, BRAFV600E colorectal cancer: A liquid biopsy approach

Abstract Introduction: BRAF + EGFR inhibition induces decreased expression of mismatch repair (MMR) genes in preclinical models of microsatellite stable (MSS), BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) but has not been reported in patients. We evaluated exosomal RNA (exoRNA) isolated from serial blood specimens collected from patients (pts) with MSS, BRAFV600E mCRC treated with encorafenib (E) + cetuximab (C) + nivolumab (N) as a novel blood-based approach to compare differences in gene expression according to treatment response. Methods: Pts with refractory MSS, BRAFV600E mCRC were treated with E (300 mg daily), C (500 mg/m2 q2 weeks), and N (480 mg q4 weeks) on an IRB-approved clinical trial at MD Anderson. Responses to treatment were assessed every 8 weeks (RECIST v1.1). ExoRNA isolated from pretreatment and on-treatment (week 8) blood samples were sequenced (SMART-seq) and deconvoluted (DeMix) in order to estimate cancer-specific gene expression. Previously validated MAPK and interferon (IFN)-γ gene expression signatures were used for measuring transcriptomic changes following treatment with E+C+N. Scores between responders and non-responders were compared by unpaired t-tests. For Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), an adjusted false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.25 was applied to find significantly enriched pathways between on-treatment and pretreatment samples separately for responders and non-responders. Results: 26 pts were treated with E+C+N, and 24 were evaluable for response. Overall response rate was 50% (95% confidence interval (CI), 29-71), and median progression-free survival was 7.4 months (95% CI, 6.0-NA). Four pts remained on study > 12 months. Between responders vs non-responders (N=12 each), mean changes in MAPK signature score was decreased (-0.63 vs 0.15, respectively; p=.13). Both patients with response > 18 months demonstrated dramatic increases in IFN-γ score following treatment with E+C+N (+13.1 and +14.6), a trend not observed in all other patients (range, -18.0 to 3.6). Among responders to E+C+N, GSEA analysis demonstrated dynamic pathway changes in normalized enrichment score (NES) for DNA repair (NES -2.3; p-adj=.008), IL6/JAK/STAT3 (NES -2.1, p-adj=.02), and IFN-α response (NES -2.0, p-adj=.03). For non-responders, relative increases in NES were observed for angiogenesis (NES 2.1, p-adj=.02) and IL-2/STAT5 (NES 2.0, p-adj= .02). Conclusions: Transcriptome analysis using exoRNA isolated from serial blood samples is feasible for assessing treatment response in pts with mCRC. Decreased MAPK score in exoRNA may be associated with treatment response to E+C+N in pts with MSS, BRAFV600E mCRC. Changes in immune NES scores following treatment may distinguish responders from non-responders to MAPK + PD-1 blockade and highlight targets for novel immune-mediated combinations for MSS, BRAFV600E mCRC. Citation Format: Van Karlyle Morris, Kimal I. Rajapakshe, Vahid Bahrambeigi, Christine M. Parsehgian, Benny Johnson, Kanwal P. Raghav, Arvind Dasari, Ryan W. Huey, Michael J. Overman, Jason Willis, Michael S. Lee, Robert A. Wolff, Bryan K. Kee, Phat Le, Paola A. Guerrero, Scott Kopetz, Anirban Maitra. Changes in exosomal RNA expression associate with treatment response to BRAF + EGFR + PD-1 blockade in MSS, BRAFV600E colorectal cancer: A liquid biopsy approach [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Colorectal Cancer; 2022 Oct 1-4; Portland, OR. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(23 Suppl_1):Abstract nr B028.

Encorafenib, binimetinib, and cetuximab in BRAF V600E–mutated colorectal cancer: an early post-marketing phase vigilance study

BackgroundTriplet and doublet regimens of encorafenib plus cetuximab with and without binimetinib, respectively, were approved in Japan for unresectable, metastatic, BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer (mCRC) that had progressed after 1–2 prior chemotherapies. This early post-marketing phase vigilance (EPPV) study collected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) from Japanese patients to ensure safety measures as appropriate.MethodsPatients with BRAF V600E mCRC who received the triplet or doublet regimens in Japan were selected for this study. ADRs were collected as spontaneous reports between November 27, 2020 and May 26, 2021. Serious ADRs were evaluated according to guidelines of the International Council for Harmonisation and the EudraVigilance list of Important Medical Event Terms.ResultsAn estimated 550 Japanese patients with mCRC received the triplet or doublet regimens during the 6-month EPPV period. Overall, 101 and 42 patients reported ADRs and serious ADRs, respectively. No ADRs leading to death were reported. The most frequently reported ADRs were nausea (17 patients), serous retinal detachment (16), decreased appetite (12), diarrhea (11), and vomiting (11). Among the important identified/potential risks that are defined in the risk management plans for encorafenib and binimetinib, eye disorder-related ADRs were observed in 32 patients, rhabdomyolysis-related ADRs in 12, hemorrhage-related ADRs in 7, and hepatic dysfunction-related ADRs in 7. Of 22 patients with serious eye disorders, 20 recovered or were recovering during the EPPV period.ConclusionThe safety profile in this EPPV study was similar to that from the phase III BEACON CRC study and no new safety concerns were identified.

LBA26 BREAKWATER safety lead-in (SLI): Encorafenib (E) + cetuximab (C) + chemotherapy (chemo) for BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

Based on the Ph 3 BEACON study (NCT02928224), BRAF inhibitor (i) encorafenib (E) + EGFRi cetuximab (C) was approved for treatment (tx) of previously treated patients (pts) with BRAFV600E mCRC, with mPFS of 4.3 months (mo) and ORR of 19.5%. In the Ph 2 ANCHOR study (NCT03693170), mPFS was 5.8 mo and ORR was 48% with 1L EC + binimetinib in BRAFV600E mCRC. To further assess 1L approaches, the ongoing Ph 3 BREAKWATER study (NCT04607421) is evaluating EC ± chemo vs standard-of-care chemo in BRAFV600E mCRC.

P-36 Real-world outcomes in BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer – the Glasgow experience

Approximately 8 - 10% of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC) have a BRAF V600E mutation. BRAF V600E mutant mCRC represents a distinct clinical subset with a poor prognosis. Previous treatment guidelines have been derived from subgroup analyses of non-designated BRAF V600E trials. Real world studies have shown that outcomes and treatment practices can vary widely. Here, we report on our regional practices and outcomes. We undertook a retrospective analysis of all mCRC patients with confirmed BRAF V600E mCRC diagnosed in NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board (Scotland, UK) between 01/01/2015 - 31/12/2020. Clinical and pathological features were obtained from electronic records. Univariate analysis of prognostic factors was performed using Kaplan Meier analysis and log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox regression. A total of 139 patients were identified for study with 1 excluded for missing follow up information. Median age at metastatic diagnosis was 69 years, with a female preponderance (59% female, 41% male). 31% of tumours also had deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) or high levels of microsatellite instability (MSI-H). Primary tumour site was mostly right-sided (n=102, 74%), with less left-sided (n=20, 15%) and rectal (n=15, 11%) tumours. 1 patient had 2 synchronous primaries (1 right colon and 1 rectal). 64% presented with de novo metastatic disease. For those with initial loco-regional disease, the median time to metastatic progression was 10 months. The most common metastatic sites were liver (54%), peritoneal (33%), lymph node (31%), and lung (28%). 36% of patients did not receive any systemic treatment, 36% received 1 line, and 28% received 2 or more lines of treatment. Most (69%) received a cytotoxic chemotherapy doublet as first-line treatment, and 6% received triplet cytotoxic chemotherapy. 7% received immunotherapy. Among the treated patients, only 19% received some form of targeted therapy over their full treatment course, usually a combination containing an anti-EGFR inhibitor. The median overall survival was poor at 7.2 months. Features significantly associated with shorter survival were performance status (PS) of 2 or worse (p < 0.01), the presence of lymph node metastasis (p = 0.010) and peritoneal metastasis (p < 0.01), a higher modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) of 2 (p = 0.035) and a high neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio >5 (p = 0.032). Primary tumour site was also significantly associated with survival (p < 0.01), with worse survival for right-sided tumours (6.6 months), compared to 14.0 months for left-sided/rectal tumours. Using multivariate analysis, independent prognostic markers were PS, presence of lymph node metastasis, presence of peritoneal metastasis and right-sided primary tumour location. This is a representative cohort of BRAF V600E metastatic colorectal cancer patients, which confirms previously known clinical features. Of the common metastatic sites, peritoneal or lymph node metastases confer a poorer prognosis. There was not widespread adoption of more intensive triplet chemotherapy over the study time period. Overall survival is poor, and changed treatment strategies facilitated by recent clinical trial advances with targeted therapies may improve outcomes in this poor prognostic group.

Quality of life with encorafenib plus cetuximab with or without binimetinib treatment in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer: patient-reported outcomes from BEACON CRC

BackgroundIn the BEACON CRC study (NCT02928224), encorafenib plus cetuximab with binimetinib {9.3 versus 5.9 months; hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.60 [0.47-0.75]} or without binimetinib [9.3 versus 5.9 months; HR (95% CI): 0.61 (0.48-0.77)] significantly improved overall survival (OS) compared with the previous standard of care (control) in patients with BRAF V600E metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Quality of life (QoL) was a secondary endpoint, assessed using validated instruments.Patients and methodsBEACON CRC was a randomized, open-label, phase III study comparing encorafenib plus cetuximab with or without binimetinib and the investigator’s choice of irinotecan plus cetuximab or FOLFIRI plus cetuximab (chemotherapy control) in patients with previously treated BRAF V600E mCRC. Patient-reported QoL assessments included the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Colorectal (FACT-C). The primary outcome for these tools was time to definitive 10% deterioration.ResultsEncorafenib plus cetuximab, both with and without binimetinib, was associated with longer median times to definitive 10% deterioration versus the control group in the EORTC Global Health Status scale [HR (95% CI): 0.65 (0.52-0.80) versus 0.61 (0.49-0.75), respectively] and the FACT-C functional well-being subscale [HR (95% CI): 0.62 (0.50-0.76) versus 0.58 (0.47-0.72), respectively]. Consistent results were observed across all subscales of the EORTC and FACT-C instruments. QoL was generally maintained during treatment for the global EORTC and FACT-C scales.ConclusionsIn addition to improving OS, encorafenib plus cetuximab with or without binimetinib delays QoL decline in previously treated patients with BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC.

BREAKWATER safety lead-in (SLI): Encorafenib + cetuximab (EC) ± chemotherapy for first-line (1L) treatment (tx) of BRAF V600E-mutant (BRAFV600E) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

134 Background: Currently, there are no 1L tx options indicated specifically for patients (pts) with BRAFV600E mCRC. Based on results of BEACON CRC (NCT02928224), BRAF inhibitor encorafenib + EGFR inhibitor cetuximab was approved for tx of previously treated pts with BRAFV600E mCRC. BREAKWATER (NCT04607421), an ongoing, open-label, global, multicenter, randomized phase 3 study, evaluates 1L EC ± chemotherapy for tx of pts with BRAFV600E mCRC. Here we present preliminary data on safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) from the BREAKWATER SLI, which aimed to identify the chemotherapy backbone for EC for the phase 3 portion of BREAKWATER. Methods: SLI inclusion criteria were BRAFV600E mCRC (determined using tumor tissue or blood); evaluable disease (RECIST v1.1); ≤1 prior systemic tx for mCRC; European Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0/1; and adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function. Pts previously treated with BRAF/EGFR inhibitors or both oxaliplatin and irinotecan were excluded. Pts received encorafenib 300 mg daily + cetuximab 500 mg/m2 every 2 weeks (Q2W) + either FOLFIRI Q2W or mFOLFOX6 Q2W in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was frequency of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). PK were a secondary endpoint. Data cutoff date: Sep 13, 2021. Results: 57 pts were enrolled (EC + FOLFIRI, n = 30; EC + mFOLFOX6, n = 27). Median (range) age was 57 (28–78) years; 25% were Asian; 65% had ECOG PS 0; 37% had ≥3 organs involved; 58% were treatment naive. At cutoff date, tx was ongoing in 45 (79%) pts. Median (range) duration of tx for encorafenib in EC + FOLFIRI and EC + mFOLFOX6 was 15 (0–31) and 14 (0–27) weeks, respectively. One DLT was observed: grade 4 neutropenia in 1 pt in EC + FOLFIRI. Tx-emergent all-cause serious adverse events (AEs) occurred in 20% and 19% and grade ≥3 AEs in 33% and 56% of pts in EC + FOLFIRI and EC + mFOLFOX6, respectively. The table shows frequent (all grade in ≥30% pts or grade ≥3 in ≥10% with either tx) tx-emergent all-cause AEs. One pt died due to disease progression. In EC + FOLFIRI, in the presence of steady-state encorafenib, AUCinf of irinotecan and its active metabolite, SN-38, significantly decreased ̃25% and ̃40%, respectively, compared with values in the absence of encorafenib. In EC + mFOLFOX6, oxaliplatin PK was not significantly altered by steady-state encorafenib. Conclusions: Based on these data, BREAKWATER phase 3 will compare EC ± mFOLFOX6 with mFOLFOX6/FOLFOXIRI/CAPOX ± bevacizumab. Clinical trial information: NCT04607421. [Table: see text]

Encorafenib, cetuximab, and cytotoxic chemotherapy combinations in BRAFV600E CRC murine models.

145 Background: Based on promising results from latest trials, a crucial point is to evaluate whether encorafenib (E) plus cetuximab (C), alone or in combination with chemotherapy, can improve clinical outcomes relative to current standard of care in previously untreated BRAFV600E mutant mCRC. Considering the high number of BRAFV600E mutant mCRC patients who will never receive a second-line treatment, the rationale of this strategy is to maximize treatment outcome within the first-line setting. Methods: We performed an in vivo study using human BRAFV600E CRC cell line-derived xenografts in nude mice. We evaluated the efficacy of encorafenib (E) + cetuximab (C), FOLFOX, and FOLFIRI, both as individual regimens and in combinations. Mice were treated for 3 weeks and followed for an additional 8 weeks to evaluate durability of tumor control. Additionally, we validated our findings using 3 BRAFV600E mutated patient derived xenografts. Tumors progressing on single agent and combined treatment were profiled by RNA sequencing, protein extraction for RPPA/Western blot, and establishment of in vitro primary cell cultures for further analyses. Results: Our study showed across all 4 models both FOLFOX and FOLFIRI, each in combination with encorafenib plus cetuximab, having greater efficacy than encorafenib plus cetuximab or either chemotherapy alone. No significant change in toxicity was seen with the addition of chemotherapy. Interestingly, in the one model with long term treatment, FOLFOX + E +/- C performed greatest over the long-term, with significant endpoint separation against all other treatment arms (P &lt; 0.05). Conclusions: Taken together, results from our study suggest that the addition of chemotherapy to BRAF+EGFR targeted therapy can further increase the magnitude of response in BRAFV600E mCRC and is a promising combination now being explored clinically. Additionally, this research will substantially contribute to our understanding of the genetic and molecular bases of resistance to target therapies and chemo-based approach in BRAFV600Econtext.

Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes in Patients with BRAF-Mutated Colorectal Cancer Following Targeted Therapy and Hepatic Resection with Curative Intent

Background: BRAF V600E mutations are present in up to 10% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and portend poor prognosis. Recently, a new class of drugs acting along the BRAF signaling pathway became available as an adjunctive treatment option. Aim: To describe the surgical short-term and the oncologic outcomes in patients with mCRC following BRAF targeted therapy with the RAF inhibitor encorafenib and subsequent liver resection. Methods: Using retrospective clinical and molecular data, patients with BRAF V600E mCRC who received systemic treatment with encorafenib and after liver resection. Results: Four patients were identified. Patients characteristics included median age 66 years, 75% female, 75% with right-sided tumors. All patients underwent primary tumor resection, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Among second- and third- line treatments, all patients had received BRAF targeted therapy and subsequent liver resections: 75% and 25% underwent minor and major liver resections, respectively. Median EBL was 75 mL, minor/major complications occurred in 50% and 0% of cases, median LOS was 4 days. Median overall survival (OS) was 47 months and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 17 months. All were alive at follow-up with active disease. Conclusion: BRAF targeted therapy constitutes a novel treatment option in a subset of patients with colorectal cancer. In a small cohort of patients treated with targeted therapy and curative intent liver resection for metastatic disease, the oncologic outcomes were superior to prior published results with no obvious impact on surgical complication rate.

The Prognostic Value of Locoregional Interventions for BRAF V600E Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

The prognostic heterogeneity in patients with BRAF V600E metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains poorly defined. Real-world data of 93 BRAF V600E mCRC patients from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were evaluated using the prognostic factors affecting overall survival (OS). Treatment of metastases served as an independent prognosticator, where curative locoregional interventions (LRIs) were associated with superior clinical outcomes (adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22–0.98; p = 0.044). The LRIs group showed an improved median OS of 49.4 months versus 18.3 months for the palliative treatments (PTs) group. The median OS of patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) was significantly prolonged after undergoing LRIs (42.4 vs. 23.7 months; HR: 0.11, 95% CI: 0.01–1.22; p = 0.030), and patients in the LRIs plus liver-limited or lung-limited metastasis (LLM) group benefited more than those in the LRIs plus non-LLM group when compared to the PTs group (LLM from LRIs vs. PTs, HR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.04–0.68; p = 0.006. Non-LLM from LRIs vs. PTs, HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.21–1.05; p = 0.074). In conclusion, we confirmed the positive prognostic value of LRIs in BRAF V600E mCRC, particularly in patients with CRLM or LLM.

BREAKWATER: Randomized phase 3 study of encorafenib (enco) + cetuximab (cetux) ± chemotherapy for first-line (1L) treatment (tx) of BRAF V600E-mutant (BRAFV600E) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

TPS3619 Background: Approximately 10% of patients (pts) with mCRC have BRAF mutations (mostly V600E). 1L tx options for BRAFV600E mCRC are limited to cytotoxic chemotherapy ± anti-VEGF or anti-EGFR, or immune checkpoint inhibitors in pts with MSI-H tumors. In Europe, Japan, and USA, the combination of BRAF inhibitor enco + EGFR inhibitor cetux is approved for tx of BRAFV600E mCRC after prior therapy. In BEACON CRC, enco + cetux resulted in a median overall survival (OS) of 9.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.0–11.3) and an objective response rate (ORR) of 19.5% (95% CI: 14.5%–25.4%) in previously treated pts with BRAFV600E mCRC (median follow-up: 12.8 months); 57.4% of pts had grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs); 9% discontinued due to AEs. Given the poor prognosis of pts with BRAFV600E mCRC and based on the efficacy and tolerability of enco + cetux from BEACON CRC, BREAKWATER will evaluate efficacy and safety of enco + cetux ± chemotherapy in tx-naive pts with BRAFV600E mCRC. Methods: BREAKWATER is an open-label, global, multicenter, randomized, phase 3 study with a safety lead-in (SLI). Approximately 60 and 870 pts will be enrolled in the SLI and phase 3 parts of the study, respectively. Pts must have BRAFV600E mCRC (determined using tumor tissue or blood); ECOG performance status 0/1; and adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function. Pts in the SLI must have evaluable disease (RECIST v1.1) and have received ≤ 1 prior tx regimen; those previously treated with a BRAF or EGFR inhibitor, or both oxaliplatin and irinotecan, will be excluded. Pts in the phase 3 study must have measurable disease and be tx naive for metastatic disease. Study tx and endpoints are shown in the table. Enrollment began on 6 January 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT04607421. [Table: see text]