BRAF V600E Immunohistochemistry Research Articles

The Expression and Clinicopathological Significance of BRAF V600E and Mucin 6 in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Retrospective Study.

Aim. The study aims to explore the expression levels and clinicopathological significance of BRAF V600E and mucin 6 in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Method. Immunohistochemistry for BRAF V600E and mucin 6 was performed in 110 patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Subsequently, a comprehensive review of medical records and clinicopathological analysis was undertaken. Results. BRAF V600E expression was detected in 11 patients (10%); mucin 6 expression was observed in 19 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma specimens (17%). Thereafter, Cox regression models indicated that positive expression of either MUC6 positive (hazard ratio = 0.091, 95% confidence interval = 0.034-0.247, P < .001) and BRAF V600E positive (hazard ratio =0.150, 95% confidence interval = 0.058-0.388, P < .001) was significantly linked with longer overall survival for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients. Conclusion. The study concludes that positive expression of BRAF V600E and mucin 6 could potentially implied significant survival benefits for patients diagnosed with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Ancillary immunohistochemical and molecular testing in the classification of cutaneous sweat gland/duct neoplasms: A validation study with emphasis on histomorphologic correlation and pathological diagnosis

Sweat gland neoplasms represent a challenging area of dermatopathology, as they are relatively uncommon and often histopathologically complex. Recent studies have uncovered distinct immunohistochemical and molecular profiles in several sweat gland neoplasms, including digital papillary adenocarcinoma (DPA), papillary eccrine adenoma/tubular apocrine adenoma (PEA/TAA), poroid family tumors (PFT)/porocarcinoma, and clear cell hidradenoma (CCH)/clear cell hidradenocarcinoma (CCHCa). To further evaluate the diagnostic utility of ancillary studies in various sweat gland neoplasms, we performed an independent validation study in a cohort of patients with acral and non-acral tumors (9 DPA, 8 PEA/TAA, 13 PFT, 5 porocarcinoma, 23 CCH, 7 CCHCa, 6 sweat gland carcinoma not otherwise specified). p63 immunohistochemistry (IHC) demonstrated a myoepithelial pattern in 8/8 DPA and 4 of 4 tested PEA/TAA cases, and showed a ductal pattern in all tested PFT/porocarcinoma and CCH/CCHCa cases (42/42). All PEA/TAA (8/8) cases were positive for BRAF V600E IHC. 5 of 12 tested PFT and 5/5 porocarcinoma cases showed either positive staining with NUT IHC or harbored YAP1::NUTM1 fusion gene by RNA sequencing. MAML2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was positive in all CCH and CCHCa cases (23/23 and 7/7, respectively). Our results further support the usefulness of appropriate ancillary studies in precise classification of sweat gland tumors, which may be routinely applied in diagnostic pathology practice when morphologic evaluation is in doubt.

Anaplastic and poorly differentiated thyroid carcinomas: genetic evidence of high-grade transformation from differentiated thyroid carcinoma.

Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) is the most advanced and aggressive thyroid cancer, and poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma (PDTC) lacks anaplastic histology but has lost architectural and cytologic differentiation. Only a few studies have focused on the genetic relationship between the two advanced carcinomas and coexisting differentiated thyroid carcinomas (DTCs). In the present study, we investigated clinicopathologic features and genetic profiles in 57 ATC and PDTC samples, among which 33 cases had concomitant DTC components or DTC history. We performed immunohistochemistry for BRAF V600E, p53, and PD-L1 expression, Sanger sequencing for TERT promoter and RAS mutations, and fluorescence in situ hybridization for ALK and RET rearrangements. We found that ATCs and PDTCs shared similar gene alterations to their coexisting DTCs, and most DTCs were aggressive subtypes harboring frequent TERT promoter mutations. A significantly higher proportion of ATCs expressed p53 and PD-L1, and a lower proportion expressed PAX-8 and TTF-1, than the coexisting DTCs. Our findings provide more reliable evidence that ATCs and PDTCs are derived from DTCs.

BRAFV600E immunohistochemistry can reliably substitute BRAF molecular testing in the Lynch syndrome screening algorithm in colorectal cancer.

The Lynch syndrome (LS) screening algorithm requires BRAF testing as a fundamental step to distinguish sporadic from LS-associated colorectal carcinomas (CRC). BRAF testing by immunohistochemistry (IHC) has shown variable results in the literature. Our aim was to analyse concordance between BRAFV600E IHC and BRAF molecular analysis in a large, mono-institutional CRC whole-slide, case series with laboratory validation. MisMatch repair (MMR) protein (hMLH1, hPMS2, hMSH2, and hMSH6) and BRAFV600E IHC were performed on all unselected cases of surgically resected CRCs (2018-2023). An in-house validation study for BRAFV600E IHC was performed in order to obtain optimal IHC stains. BRAFVV600E IHC was considered negative (score 0), positive (scores 2-3), and equivocal (score 1). Interobserver differences in BRAFV600E IHC scoring were noted in the first 150 cases prospectively collected. Nine-hundred and ninety CRCs cases (830 proficient (p)MMR/160 deficient (d)MMR) were included and all cases performed BRAFV600E IHC (BRAFV600E IHC-positive 13.5% of all series; 66.3% dMMR cases; 3.4% pMMR cases), while 333 also went to BRAF mutation analysis. Optimal agreement in IHC scoring between pathologists (P < 0.0001) was seen; concordance between BRAFV600E IHC and BRAF molecular analysis was extremely high (sensitivity 99.1%, specificity 99.5%; PPV 99.1%, and NPV 99.5%). Discordant cases were reevaluated; 1 score 3 + IHC/wildtype case was an interpretation error and one score 0 IHC/mutated case was related to heterogenous BRAFV600E IHC expression. Among the 12 IHC-equivocal score 1+ cases (which require BRAF molecular analysis), three were BRAF-mutated and nine BRAF-wildtype. BRAFV600E IHC can be used as a reliable surrogate of molecular testing after stringent in-house validation.

Two distinct pathogenic pathways of digital papillary adenocarcinoma - BRAF mutation or low-risk HPV infection.

Digital papillary adenocarcinoma (DPA) is a rare neoplasm that can exhibit local recurrence and distant metastasis. We present a series of eight cases of DPA showing two distinct clinical presentations, morphologies, immunophenotypes, and molecular features. Four cases were characterized by painless, slow-growing nodules located on the digits. The lesions were small, well-defined, and confined in the dermis. Histopathologically, these tumors were composed of glandular structures lined by cuboidal epithelium with luminal papillary infoldings. Only rare mitotic figures and minimal squamoid differentiation were present, and cellular necrosis was absent. All four cases were positive for the BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry but negative for p16, low-risk and high-risk HPV in situ hybridization (ISH). In contrast, the remaining four cases were characterized by painful, rapidly growing masses on the digits. These four lesions were located in the deep dermis and consisted of a solid, tightly packed papillary architecture lined by atypical epithelioid cells with inconspicuous nucleoli. Cellular necrosis, numerous mitotic figures, and prominent squamoid differentiation were seen. All cases were negative for the BRAF V600E IHC. However, they showed strong, patchy to diffuse reactivity for p16 and were positive for low-risk HPV ISH and negative for high-risk HPV ISH. Our findings suggest that the current classification of DPA encompasses tumors that show two discrete pathogenic pathways - BRAF mutation or low-risk HPV infection. DPAs with low-risk HPV infection exhibit aggressive clinical features, high-grade morphology, marked squamoid differentiation, and wild-type BRAF. DPAs with BRAF V600E have less aggressive clinical features, low-grade morphologic findings, mild to absent squamoid differentiation, and negative HPV infection.

Correlation of clinical, pathologic, and genetic parameters with intratumoral immune milieu in mucinous adenocarcinoma of the colon

AbstractMucinous adenocarcinoma (MAD), the most common subtype of colonic adenocarcinoma (CA), requires >50% intratumoral mucin. There is limited data regarding the impact of MAD on key lymphocyte subsets and therapeutically critical immune elements. In this study we address: (1) the definition of MAD, (2) grading of MAD, and (3) the impact of MAD and extracellular mucin on intratumoral immune milieu. Estimation of the percentage of intratumoral mucin was performed by two pathologists. Tissue microarrays were stained for immune markers including CD8, CD163, PD-L1, FoxP3, β2 microglobulin, HLA class I, and HLA class II. Immunohistochemistry for BRAF V600E was performed. MMR status was determined on immunohistochemistry for MSH2, MSH6, MLH1, PMS2. Manual and automated HALO platforms were used for quantification. The 903 CAs included 62 (6.9%) MAD and 841 CA with ≤ 50% mucin. We identified 225 CAs with mucinous differentiation, defined by ≥10% mucin. On univariate analysis neither cut point, 50% (p = 0.08) and 10% (p = 0.08) mucin, correlated with disease-specific survival (DSS). There were no differences in key clinical, histological and molecular features between MAD and CA with mucinous differentiation. On univariate analysis of patients with MAD, tumor grade correlated with DSS (p = 0.0001) while MMR status did not (p = 0.86). There was no statistically significant difference in CD8 (P = 0.17) and CD163 (P = 0.05) positive immune cells between MAD and conventional CA. However, deficient (d) MMR MADs showed fewer CD8 (P = 0.0001), CD163 (P = 0.0001) and PD-L1 (P = 0.003) positive immune cells compared to proficient (p)MMR MADs, a finding also seen with at 10% mucin cut point. Although MAD does not impact DSS, this study raises the possibility that the immune milieu of dMMR MADs and tumors with > =10% mucin may differ from pMMR MADs and tumors with <10% mucin, a finding that may impact immune-oncology based therapeutics.

Usefulness of BRAF VE1 immunohistochemistry in non-small cell lung cancers: a multi-institutional study by 15 pathologists in Korea.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is an approved test to select patients for BRAF V600E targeted therapy in Korea. However, the high cost, long turnaround times, and the need for sophisticated equipment and skilled personnel limit the use of NGS in daily practice. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a rapid and relatively inexpensive assay available in most laboratories. Therefore, in this study, we evaluate the usefulness of BRAF VE1 IHC in terms of predictive value and interobserver agreement in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). A total of 30 cases with known BRAF mutation status were selected, including 20 cases of lung adenocarcinomas, six cases of colorectal adenocarcinomas, and four cases of papillary thyroid carcinomas. IHC for BRAF V600E was carried out using the VE1 antibody. Fifteen pathologists independently scored both the staining intensity and the percentage of tumor cell staining on whole slide images. In the lung adenocarcinoma subset, interobserver agreement for the percentage of tumor cell staining and staining intensity was good (percentage of tumor cell staining, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.869; staining intensity, kappa = 0.849). The interobserver agreement for the interpretation using the cutoff of 40% was almost perfect in the entire study group and the lung adenocarcinoma subset (kappa = 0.815). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of BRAF VE1 IHC were 80.0%, 90.0%, 88.9%, and 81.8%, respectively. BRAF VE1 IHC could be a screening test for the detection of BRAF V600E mutation in NSCLC. However, further studies are needed to optimize the protocol and to establish and validate interpretation criteria for BRAF VE1 IHC.

BRAF V600E Immunohistochemistry Predicts Prognosis of Patients with Cutaneous Melanoma in Thai population.

Background:The BRAF V600E mutation in the Thai population has been identified in a considerable percentage of people with cutaneous melanoma. The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence of this mutation in cutaneous melanomas, conduct a clinicopathological association analysis with the BRAF V600E mutation, and develop a treatment strategy for patients with this mutation that would take advantage of the medications currently available to treat them.Methods:Anti-BRAF V600E (clone VE1) immunohistochemistry was performed on 50 pathological samples of cutaneous melanoma after excluding the samples with a low amount of pathologic tissue, a lack of clinical data‚ and poor follow-up. BRAF V600E expression DNA sequencing was performed to confirm the results of several cases.Results:Anti-BRAF V600E antibody positivity was noted in 56% (28/50) of cutaneous melanoma cases. DNA sequencing results were consistent with immunohistochemistry results. In cutaneous melanoma, the BRAF V600E mutation was significantly associated with adverse prognosis of patients, including reduced overall survival and disease-free survival.Conclusions:An increased prevalence of the BRAF V600E mutation was determined in a collection of cutaneous melanomas in the Thai population, implying that BRAF-targeted therapy may be a promising strategy for patients with BRAF-mutated cutaneous melanoma. This study revealed an association between the clinicopathological aspects of cutaneous melanoma and overall survival, disease-free survival, and overall mortality. A treatment with anti-BRAF-targeted therapy, which incorporates the already available medications‚ is being researched and developed.

Assessment of BRAF V600E (VE1) immunochemistry for the detection of BRAF V600E mutation in non-small cell lung carcinoma cytology specimens.

Non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients with BRAF V600E-mutated tumors respond to targeted therapy. Testing for BRAF V600E is commonly performed with molecular methods; however, a mutation-specific VE1 antibody clone can provide an alternative testing option using immunohistochemistry (IHC)for practices using single-gene testing and in situations when the specimen is inadequate for molecular testing. This study evaluates the usefulness of VE1 IHC in screening for BRAF V600E mutations in NSCLC cytology specimens. The authors retrospectively identified cytology cases with a diagnosis of NSCLC that had BRAF V600E IHC performed on cell block sections with the monoclonal VE1 antibody clone. The BRAF V600E IHC results were compared with those of molecular testing performed with an amplicon-based next-generation sequencing assay. There were 201 NSCLC cases evaluated. The VE1 IHC was positive in seven of seven BRAF V600E-mutated tumors (100%) and was negative in 158 of 158 nonmutated BRAF V600E tumors (100%). Thirty cases did not undergo molecular testing, primarily because of insufficient tissue or because molecular testing was performed on an alternative specimen. Six cases showed equivocal weak/focal staining: Two cases demonstrated BRAF V600E mutations, and four cases were negative by molecular testing. This study suggests that BRAF V600E IHC can be used reliably to screen NSCLC cytology specimens, and negative results strongly indicate the absence of a BRAF V600E mutation. Having a low threshold for equivocal staining is recommended with molecular confirmation of BRAF V600E for any cases demonstrating weak and/or focal cytoplasmic staining.

Preoperative BRAFV600E mutation detection in thyroid carcinoma by immunocytochemistry.

The BRAFV600E (BRAF) mutation is present in 40-50% of papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTC) and has been associated with more aggressive clinicopathological characteristics of PTC. The aim of this study was to evaluate different methods for preoperative identification of the BRAF mutation in PTC using cytological and histological specimens. Prospectively collected preoperative cytological clots from patients with suspected PTC were tested with BRAF immunocytochemistry (ICC) and the Cobas Test (PCR). In addition, histological specimens were tested with BRAF immunohistochemistry (IHC) and the Cobas Test. All nodules were histologically examined. Fifty-three patients were included in the study. Complete mutation testing was available in 32 patients. The main reason for exclusion was insufficient cell content in the cytological specimen. Twenty-seven nodules were histologically diagnosed as PTC, and 41% (n = 11) of PTCs were BRAF ICC positive. All non-PTC nodules were negative by BRAF ICC. In 26 nodules, all four BRAF tests were concordant, while discordant test results were found in six nodules. ICC was in accordance with the consensus BRAF status in five of these nodules, while BRAF status was undetermined in one nodule. BRAF ICC showed high concordance with the Cobas Test and a low rate of false negative stain. These results indicate that BRAF ICC may be a feasible method for preoperative detection of the BRAFV600E mutation in patients with PTC.

Pathologist initiated reflex BRAF mutation testing in metastatic melanoma: experience at a specialist melanoma treatment centre

Testing for BRAF mutations in metastatic melanoma is pivotal to identifying patients suitable for targeted therapy and influences treatment decisions regarding single agent versus combination immunotherapy. Knowledge of BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry (IHC) results can streamline decisions during initial oncology consultations, prior to DNA-based test results. In the absence of formal guidelines that require pathologist initiated ('reflex') BRAF mutation testing, our institution developed a local protocol to perform BRAF V600E IHC on specimens from all stage III/IV melanoma patients when the status is otherwise unknown. This study was designed to evaluate the application of this protocol in a tertiary referral pathology department. A total of 408 stage III/IV melanoma patients had tissue specimens accessioned between 1 January and 31 March in three consecutive years (from 2019 to 2021), reported by 32 individual pathologists. The BRAF mutation status was established by pathologists in 87% (352/408) of cases. When a prior BRAF mutation status was previously known, as confirmed in linked electronic records (202/408), this status had been communicated by the clinician on the pathology request form in 1% of cases (3/202). Pathologists performed BRAF V600E IHC in 153 cases (74% of cases where the status was unknown, 153/206) and testing was duplicated in 5% of cases (20/408). Reflex BRAF IHC testing was omitted in 26% of cases (53/206), often on specimens with small volume disease (cytology specimens or sentinel node biopsies) despite adequate tissue for testing. Incorporating BRAF IHC testing within routine diagnostic protocols of stage III/IV melanoma was both feasible and successful in most cases. Communication of a patient's BRAF mutation status via the pathology request form will likely improve implementation of pathologist initiated BRAF mutation testing and may result in a reduction of duplicate tests. To improve pathologist reflex testing rates, we advocate for the use of an algorithmic approach to pathologist initiated BRAF mutation testing utilising both IHC and DNA-based methodologies for stage III/IV melanoma patients.

Benign and Intermediate-grade Melanocytic Tumors With BRAF Mutations and Spitzoid Morphology: A Subset of Melanocytic Neoplasms Distinct From Melanoma.

The current classification of Spitz neoplasms in the World Health Organization (WHO), Fourth Edition defines Spitz neoplasms as melanocytic proliferations with characteristic Spitz morphology and a Spitz-associated genomic fusion or HRAS mutation. In contrast, melanocytic neoplasms with BRAF mutations are considered typical of common acquired nevi, dysplastic nevi, and melanomas from intermittent sun-damaged skin. However, increased utilization of ancillary testing methods such as BRAFV600E immunohistochemistry and sequencing studies have made apparent a subgroup of benign-grade and intermediate-grade melanocytic neoplasms with Spitzoid morphology that harbor BRAFV600E mutations. We refer to these cases as BRAF mutated and morphologically Spitzoid (BAMS) nevi and tumors. Two experienced dermatopathologists reviewed a series of 36 BAMS nevi/tumors. Cases in which a diagnosis of melanoma was favored were excluded. The histomorphologic, clinical, and molecular findings were assessed by immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and next-generation sequencing using validated gene panels. Characteristics of BAMS nevi/tumors were compared with a control set of Spitz tumors with previously reported fusion proteins. BAMS nevi/tumors had a decreased proportion of Kamino bodies (P=0.03) and a higher proportion of cytoplasmic pigmentation (P<0.00001). There were no differences in other morphologic features such as the silhouette, epidermal hyperplasia, pagetosis, and cytologic atypia compared with fusion-induced Spitz tumors. In 6/17 cases where next-generation sequencing studies were available, recurrent mutations in the KMT gene family were seen. This was higher than the proportion of such mutations seen in fusion Spitz tumors and lower than the frequency in cutaneous melanoma.

BRAF Rearrangements and BRAF V600E Mutations Are Seen in a Subset of Pancreatic Carcinomas With Acinar Differentiation.

Comprehensive genomic profiling has demonstrated that approximately 20% of pancreatic carcinomas with acinar differentiation harbor potentially targetable BRAF fusions that activate the MAPK pathway. To validate the above finding by BRAF break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in a large series of pure acinar cell carcinomas (ACCs), evaluate tumors for the presence of BRAF V600E mutations, and compare clinicopathologic features of tumors with BRAF rearrangements with those without. Thirty cases of pure ACC and 6 cases of mixed acinar-neuroendocrine carcinoma (ACC-NEC) were retrieved. A break-apart FISH probe was used to detect BRAF rearrangements. Immunohistochemistry for BRAF V600E was performed. BRAF rearrangements by FISH were found in 6 of 36 cases (17%), 5 of which were pure ACC and 1 was a mixed ACC-NEC. Follow-up was available in 29 of 36 cases (81%). The median survival was 22 months for BRAF-rearranged cases and 16 months for BRAF-intact cases; the 2-year overall survival was 50% for BRAF-rearranged cases and 35% for BRAF-intact cases. No significant clinicopathologic differences were identified in cases with BRAF rearrangement compared with those without BRAF rearrangement. BRAF V600E mutation was identified in 2 of 34 cases (6%), both of which were pure ACC and were BRAF-intact by FISH. This study supports the finding that BRAF rearrangements are present in approximately 20% of cases and identified BRAF V600E mutations in approximately 5% of cases. These cases may benefit from targeted therapy.

Expanding Our Understanding of Nevogenesis: Copy Number Gain of Chromosome 15q in Melanocytic Nevi Is Associated With Distinct Histomorphologic Findings.

As the landscape of melanomagenesis becomes better refined through increasingly detailed schema grounded in distinct clinicopathologic-molecular pathways, the stepwise process and variations of molecular nevogenesis have largely remained elusive. Herein, we present a series of 8 melanocytic nevi in patients ranging from 40 to 74 years of age (median: 59.5 y), which demonstrated a reproducible constellation of histomorphologic features as well as a copy number gain of the long arm of chromosome 15 (15q). The most characteristic histologic feature was sclerosis with maturation at the base of the lesion. All cases demonstrated a dome-shaped configuration and epidermal acanthosis with hyperpigmentation. However, the cytologic features ranged in their appearances from that of a banal nevus with ovoid nuclei, inconspicuous nucleoli, and minimal cytoplasm to enlarged, epithelioid forms with central nucleoli and abundant cytoplasm. No lesions showed staining with BRAF V600E or NRAS Q61R immunohistochemistry. Single-nucleotide polymorphism-based chromosome microarray analysis revealed a monoaberrant 15q gain in all cases. The histology was sufficiently distinctive in the initial 6 cases encountered to allow for prospective identification of 2 additional cases harboring a 15q gain. The clinical follow-up did not reveal recurrence in any case. Although adverse outcomes were not observed in our cohort, future studies are needed to more adequately characterize the clinical and biological behavior of these lesions.

Renal neoplasia with papillary architecture involving the pelvicalyceal system

Pelvicalyceal system (PS) involvement by renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is staged as pT3a disease (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC], 8th edition). As papillary RCC (PRCC) has been infrequently represented in studies looking at the prognostic impact of PS involvement, we reviewed our institutional cohort of 8225 cases for PS involvement by PRCC. Nine such cases were subjected to histopathologic review and immunohistochemistry. Fluorescence in situ hybridization for TFE3/TFEB alterations was performed if indicated. One case each (1 of 9, 11%) was classified as TFE3-rearranged and FH-deficient RCC. The majority were high grade (World Health Organization/International Society of Urologic Pathology grade 3: 8 of 9, 89%) or had features of aggressive disease, including hilar fat (6 of 9, 67%) and regional lymph node involvement (5 of 7, 71%). One low-grade 3.3-cm tumor with isolated PS involvement with a germline heterozygous FH p.Lys477dup alteration with retained FH, lack of increased S-(2-succino)-cysteine expression, BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry positivity, and lack of trisomy 7/17 on chromosomal microarray was identified, arguing against an FH-deficient and conventional PRCC. Our study shows that PS involvement by renal neoplasia with papillary architecture is a rare event. Aside from PRCC, it is important to note that these may include other aggressive and nonaggressive subtypes of renal neoplasia with papillary architecture. One case of isolated PS involvement by a low-grade, noninvasive tumor that we refer to as nephrogenic papillary neoplasmwas identified. At present, there are insufficient data to stage such tumors as pT3a (AJCC, 8th edition), and additional studies are needed to address this question.

Discrepancy between immunohistochemistry and sequencing for BRAF V600E in odontogenic tumours: Comparative analysis of two VE1 antibodies.

Although immunohistochemistry (IHC) along with molecular tests has been investigated in ameloblastoma for BRAF V600E detection, VE1 IHC has not been studied in odontogenic carcinomas (OCs) and benign mixed epithelial and mesenchymal odontogenic tumours (BMOTs). Here, we performed BRAF V600E mutation analysis, examined the expression pattern of VE1 IHC, and comparatively evaluated the performance of two VE1 antibodies in ameloblastomas, OCs and BMOTs. BRAF V600E detection was performed using Sanger sequencing in a total of 47 odontogenic tumours: 28 ameloblastomas, 6 OCs and 13 BMOTs. VE1 IHC was conducted using two different antibodies (IHC-A and IHC-V), and their performance was analysed by calculating the sensitivity and specificity compared with sequencing. BRAF V600E mutations were identified in 24/28 (85.7%) ameloblastomas, 2/5 (40.0%) ameloblastic carcinomas (ACs), 3/7 (42.9%) ameloblastic fibromas and 1/2 (50.0%) ameloblastic fibro-odontomas. In the presence of the mutation, VE1 showed diffuse cytoplasmic staining in ameloblastomas and ACs, whereas all BMOTs were negative for VE1. IHC-A and IHC-V yielded a sensitivity of 76.7% and 60.0%, respectively, although both antibodies showed 100% specificity. OCs and BMOTs have BRAF V600E mutations in common at lower frequencies than ameloblastoma. Diffuse VE1 cytoplasmic staining in AC suggests the utility of MAPK-targeted therapy as selectively applied in ameloblastoma, and consistent VE1 false-negative expression in BMOTs requires further investigation. Considering the high specificity but low sensitivity of VE1 IHC, molecular tests should be performed to determine the presence of BRAF V600E mutations in odontogenic tumours.

526 MICROSATELLITE INSTABILITY IN GASTRO-ESOPHAGEAL ADENOCARCINOMAS

Abstract Microsatellite instability (MSI) in gastro-esophageal adenocarcinomas (GEAs) is associated with poor response to chemotherapy; however, this association is poorly understood. The aim of this study is to better understand the clinical relevance and mutational landscape of MSI in GEA. Methods In order to assess the status of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, we performed immunohistochemistry for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2 and BRAF V600E on tissue microarrays constructed from 161 patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma and 65 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma, operated between 2011 to 2019. MMR- deficient (MMR-D) status was confirmed using full sections of tumors. Demographics, tumor, and treatment details, operative variable and overall survival were evaluated. Genomic characterization of 3 MSI-H and 10 MSS patients was performed using deep targeted sequencing of 234 potential oncogenic genes. Statistical analysis was performed using Cox regression, logistic regression, ANOVA or Chi-square tests. Results Among the 28 (12%) MMR-D immunophenotype patients identified: 25 showed a combined MLH1/PMS2 loss, one case with MSH2/MSH6 loss and two cases with isolated MSH6 or MSH2 loss. Patients in the MMR-D were older (74 ± 14 vs 67 ± 11 years, p = 0.01) and with more Siewert-III and sub-cardia tumors [64%(18) vs 40%(79), p = 0.002] compared to MMR-Stable patients. All other variables including sex, stage and grade were not significantly different. MMR-D immunophenotype was associated with better overall survival (Median survival of 5.7vs2.3 years, p &amp;lt; 0.04) (Figure 1A). Genomic analysis linked patients with D-MMR with a higher mutational burden with some potentially targetable mutations (Figure 1B). Conclusion The significant proportion of MMR-D immunophenotype identified in this gastroesophageal cohort and the different pattern of overall survival and genetic mutations associated with this phenotype, highlight the importance of further characterization and understanding the mechanisms and role of MMR status in GEAs.

Abstract 2343: The incidence of BRAF mutation in non-small cell lung cancers is low in Korean patients

Abstract Introduction: BRAF mutation is present in about 8% of all cancer. Oncogenic activity of BRAF V600E mutation was established in lung cancers. Dabrafenib and trametinib combination therapy is preferred first line therapy for advanced or metastatic lung cancer with BRAF V600E mutation. However, there is only little basic knowledge of BRAF mutational status among Korean population. In this study, BRAF mutation, particularly BRAF V600E mutational status was explored among Korean non-small cell lung cancer patients. The clinical and pathologic characteristics of BRAF V600E mutation in non-small cell lung cancers were also investigated. Materials and Methods: The final cohort was 378 cases of primary non-small cell lung cancers. Fromalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue blocks were used. PNA-mediated clamping PCR for BRAF V600, BRAF V600E real-time PCR and immunohistochemistry for mutation specific monoclonal antibody of Ventana VE1 were performed on all 378 cases of non-small cell lung cancers. For positive cases, direct sequencing was performed for validation. Results: BRAF V600 mutation was detected in five cases using PNA clamping method among 378 non-small cell carcinoma cases. By using BRAF real-time PCR, a BRAF V600E mutation was detected in 3 patients among total 378 cohort. There were 2 discordant cases between PNA clamping and real-time PCR. On immunohistochemistry, 3 patients showed positive staining for tumor cytoplasm and all positive cases also had positive results in real-time PCR. Direct Sanger sequencing was done in 5 cases that had any positive results for 3 methods. The results of Sanger sequencing was the same with those of real-time PCR and immunohistochemistry. Direct sequencing using PAN PCR product was performed on 2 negative cases for validation. On sequencing using PNA clamping PCR product, all cases showed mutation for BRAF gene other than V600E genotype. Finally, there were 3 cases (0.8%) of BRAF V600E mutation and 2 cases of BRAF mutation (0.5%) other than V600E genotype. Among BRAF mutated patients, there were 2 never smokers and 3 ever smokers. All patients harboring BRAF mutation had no concomitant EGFR or ALK aberrations. Conclusion: BRAF mutation incidence is relatively lower than that of Western data set and similar to that of Japanese report. Immunohistochemistry for Ventana VE1 antibody can be a useful screening method to detect BRAF V600E mutation. Citation Format: Ahrong Kim, Hyo Yeong Ahn, Chang Hun Lee, Young Dae Kim, Min Ki Lee, Yeon Joo Jeong, So Jeong Lee. The incidence of BRAF mutation in non-small cell lung cancers is low in Korean patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 2343.

Molecular Predictors for Advanced Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Recurrence.

Despite its indolent course, one-third of the papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) cases relapses, which directly impact on the quality of patients' lives. The molecular predictors of recurrence of PTC are poorly defined. We aimed at evaluating the long-term (10–20 years) prognostic value of aggressiveness markers in advanced PTC. To this end, immunohistochemistry for BRAFV600E, Estrogen receptor α, Progesterone receptor, Ki-67, and E-cadherin were performed in 53 primary advanced PTC from an up to 20 years follow-up patients from a well-characterized Brazilian cohort. Categorical data were summarized using frequencies and groups were compared using Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests. The expressions of the aggressiveness markers were associated with clinical-pathological data using the single-covariate logistic regression analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method with the Log-rank and Peto tests was used to estimate the probability of PTC-free survival. Persistence and recurrence (active disease) were associated with age (≥55 years), tumor size (>2 cm), extrathyroidal extension, local aggressiveness, macroscopic lymph node metastasis, and TNM stage at initial treatment. The BRAFV600E mutation status was associated with extrathyroidal extension, local aggressiveness, and inversely associated with distant metastasis at initial treatment. All progesterone receptor-positive patients had active disease and displayed a shorter time of PTC-free survival than the negative ones using the Kaplan-Meir analysis (p = 0.001, Log Rank; p = 0.005, Peto). Loss of E-cadherin expression was associated with an increase in the probability of active disease (OR = 3.75). BRAFV600E could be useful as a biomarker of local aggressiveness, while PR positive and E-cadherin loss of expression could predict the recurrence of advanced PTC.

Metanephric Adenoma-Epithelial Wilms Tumor Overlap Lesions: An Analysis of BRAF Status.

Metanephric adenoma (MA) has historically been considered to represent a differentiated form of epithelial Wilms tumor (WT), based in part upon cases that morphologically overlap these 2 neoplasms. More recently, BRAF V600E mutations have been demonstrated in the majority of MAs but not in unselected or even epithelial-predominant WTs, suggesting 2 genetically distinct entities. However, no prior study has examined BRAF status in neoplasms with overlapping histologic features of epithelial WT and MA. We studied a cohort of 11 such overlapping lesions, 2 of which we considered morphologically to be otherwise typical MAs with unusually prominent mitotic activity and 9 of which we classified as epithelial WTs with areas resembling MA. Both mitotically active MAs demonstrated the BRAF V600E mutation. While the majority (5/9) of epithelial WTs with areas resembling MA were negative for BRAF V600E mutation, 4 such cases were positive. Two BRAF V600E mutation-positive WTs occurred in children. One case in a 6-year-old male was morphologically similar to the BRAF V600E mutation-positive adult cases and subsequently metastasized to the lungs; remarkably, the metastases then completely resolved on Braf targeted therapy. A second occurred in a 3-year-old girl whose posttherapy nephrectomy specimen's tumor was encapsulated and mitotically active like a typical WT, but also had more differentiated areas resembling MA. Immunohistochemistry for Braf V600E paralleled the molecular findings, demonstrating immunoreactivity in both the WT and MA-like areas of all 4 of these neoplasms. In summary, we demonstrate that BRAF V600E mutations are not entirely restricted to typical MA, as they may be seen in MAs showing mitotic activity along with a subset of epithelial-predominant WTs in adults and children that have foci which overlap morphologically with MA.