Brachytherapy For Prostate Cancer Research Articles

Effect of Polyacrylamide-Based Rectal Gel Spacers on Dose Distribution and Rectal Toxicity during High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer

Effect of Polyacrylamide-Based Rectal Gel Spacers on Dose Distribution and Rectal Toxicity during High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer

Brachytherapy for favorable prognostic prostate cancer in men up to 60 years of age: Long term follow-up

Brachytherapy (BT) is a standard treatment for low- and favorable intermediate-risk prostate adenocarcinoma. Few studies have focused on young patients. We therefore evaluated long-term efficacy and toxicity of BT in patients aged ≤ 60 years with low- and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer. This retrospective study included patients aged ≤60 years with low- or favorable intermediate-risk prostate adenocarcinoma treated with iodine BT alone between 1999 and 2014 at the Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine. Follow-up assessment included incidence of biochemical failure (BF) at 10 and 15 years after BT, as well as survival data and late toxicities. A total of 177 patients of median age 56 years (54-58) were analyzed, with a median follow-up of 126 months (97-172). Incidence of BF at 10 and 15 years after BT was 5.4% and 11.7% respectively. PSA nadir (HR = 51.8 [95% CI 6.69-277], p < 0.001), age at treatment (HR = 1.78 [95% CI 1.19-2.65], p = 0.005) and prostate D90% (HR = 1.08 [95% CI 1.01-1.15], p < 0.021) were identified as predictive factors of BF. Overall survival at 10 and 15 years after BT was 92.8% and 84.4% respectively. Cancer-specific survival at 10 and 15 years after BT was 99.3% and 97.7% respectively. No major toxicity was recorded. Exclusive BT is a long-term effective treatment for patients aged ≤ 60 years with low- or favorable intermediate-risk prostate adenocarcinoma.

Prostate brachytherapy seed migration to the right renal artery due to right‐to‐left shunting across a patent foramen ovale

IntroductionThe seeds used in brachytherapy for prostate cancer may migrate through the surrounding venous plexus to other sites in the body, most commonly to the pulmonary vasculature.Case presentationA 78‐year‐old Japanese man received iodine‐125 low‐dose‐rate prostate brachytherapy. Computed tomography revealed that one seed had migrated to the right kidney. No seed was observed in the ureter upon ureteroscopy. Transesophageal echocardiography confirmed a right‐to‐left shunt due to a patent foramen ovale, suggesting that the seed had migrated into the right renal artery. Three years after treatment, no recurrence of prostate cancer and no adverse events due to seed migration or due to the patent foramen ovale occurred.ConclusionArteriovenous malformations and a right‐to‐left shunt should be suspected if a brachytherapy seed has migrated to an artery of the systemic circulatory system.

Focal brachytherapy as definitive treatment for localized prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSEIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, we describe the oncologic and toxicity outcomes of definitive focal brachytherapy for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALSA PROSPERO registered study (CRD42023410170) was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library were searched for studies between 2000 and 2022. Two authors independently performed the initial search. Biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) was defined as the primary endpoint for the meta-analysis. Generalized linear mixed-effects models were conducted to calculate effect size and quantify heterogeneity. We also describe the side effects and local recurrence patterns of focal brachytherapy. RESULTSTen studies were identified and included 315 patients treated using focal brachytherapy as a definitive treatment. Mean (SD) age was 67.65 (7.9) years and mean (SD) PSA was 7.15 (2.7) ng/mL. Most patients (n = 236, 75%) underwent LDR Brachytherapy and 25% received HDR brachytherapy. Among the participants, 147 (46.5%) had a Gleason score ≤6, and 169 (53.5%) had a Gleason score ≥7. Only 11 (3.5%) patients received ADT. Overall, bRFS rate at median follow-up 4 years (Range: 1–6.42 years) was 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82–95%). Acute Grade ≤ 2 GU and GI toxicities were reported in 22 (7%) and 11 (3.5%) patients, respectively. Late Grade ≤ 2 GU and GI toxicity were reported in 6 (2%) and 14 (4.4%) patients, respectively. One case of prostate hemorrhage due to improper foley removal was noted but otherwise no acute or late Grade 3 or higher GI or GU toxicity related to radiotherapy was reported. CONCLUSIONOverall, definitive focal brachytherapy has a favorable toxicity profile. Oncologic outcomes are yet to mature. The evidence is limited by the small number of studies with low patients’ number, across study heterogeneity, and possibility of publication bias.

The impact of a positive COVID-19 test on timeliness of radiation in patients receiving brachytherapy

BACKGROUNDDelays in initiating and completing brachytherapy may have adverse oncologic outcomes for patients with cervical, uterine, and prostate cancer. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on brachytherapy in the United States has not been well-characterized. OBJECTIVESWe aim to evaluate how a positive COVID-19 test affected timeliness of treatment for patients undergoing brachytherapy for cervical, uterine, and prostate cancer. METHODSWe queried the National Cancer Database to identify patients diagnosed with cervical, uterine, and prostate cancer in 2019 and 2020 who received brachytherapy in their treatment. Patients who tested positive for COVID-19 between cancer diagnosis and start of radiation were compared to those who did not test positive for COVID-19. Time in days from cancer diagnosis to initiation of radiation was compared using two-sample t-tests with p < 0.05 signifying significant differences. RESULTSWe identified 38,341 patients with cervical (n = 6,925), uterine (n = 18,587), and prostate cancer (n = 12,829). Rates of COVID-19 positivity were cervical cancer (n = 135; 2%), uterine cancer (n = 236; 1.3%), and prostate cancer (n = 141; 1%). Of those, 35% of cervical, 49% of uterine, and 43% of prostate cancer patients tested positive between their cancer diagnosis and initiation of radiation. Median days to radiation was significantly longer in these patients: 78 versus 51 for cervical cancer (p < 0.01), 150 versus 104 for uterine cancer (p < 0.01), and 154 versus 124 for prostate cancer (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONSFor patients with cervical, uterine, and prostate cancer diagnosed between 2019–2020, testing positive for COVID-19 after their cancer diagnosis was associated with a delay to initiation of radiation by 4–7 weeks.

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of high-dose rate brachytherapy for radiorecurrent prostate cancer: asystematic review and meta-analysis.

High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) plays an important role in the treatment of locally recurrent prostate cancer after definitive treatment. The objective of this study is to summarize the efficacy and toxicity of HDR-BT in these patients. We performed asystematic review of PubMed and EMBASE from inception to July 2023. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS) in different subgroups, and the secondary endpoint was gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity. Asemi-automated tool (WebPlotDigitizer) and anew Shiny application combined with Rsoftware (R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; https://www.R-project.org/ ) helped to reconstruct survival curves. Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria for quantitative analysis, including 1447 patients. Atotal of 761 patients from 13studies were included in survival reconstruction, and the median RFS time was 61.2 months (57.6-72.0months). The estimated 2‑, 3‑, and 5‑year rates were 75.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 72.8 ~ 79.2%), 66.7% (95% CI 63.0 ~ 70.5%), and 52.3% (95% CI 47.5 ~ 57.4%), respectively. Whole-gland irradiation with multiple fractions (≥ 2F) resulted in better RFS compared with focal gland irradiation with fewer fractions (1F mostly; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.60, 95% CI 0.47-0.77, p < 0.0001). According to the different median time from primary treatment to salvage therapy (TRS) and median age at recurrence, short median TRS (56-67.2 months vs. 70-120 months; HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.68-0.40; p < 0.0001) and younger median age (60-70years vs. 71-75years; HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.46-0.74; p < 0.0001) were positive factors for RFS. The cumulative incidences estimated for grade ≥ 3 acute and late GU toxicities were 1% (95% CI 0 ~ 1%) and 5% (95% CI 4 ~ 7%), respectively. Three patients (3/992) experienced grade ≥ 3 late GI toxicity, and no cases of grade ≥ 3 acute GI toxicity were reported. HDR-BT has ahigh safety profile and good RFS benefit for salvage treatment of radiorecurrent prostate cancer. In terms of RFS, whole-gland irradiation with multiple fractions seems to be better than focal gland irradiation with fewer fractions, while short TRS and younger age are good prognostic factors. In view of the low level of evidence in the included studies and the large heterogeneity of each study, these conclusions still need to be confirmed by randomized controlled trials.

Brachytherapy: The urologist opinion.

Prostate cancer remains a prevalent concern worldwide, necessitating continual advancements in treatment modalities. This abstract explores the role of brachytherapy as a viable and effective option in the management of prostate cancer. Brachytherapy involves the implantation of radioactive sources directly into the prostate, providing a localized dose of radiation. n recent studies and clinical trials, brachytherapy has demonstrated promising outcomes, particularly in terms of disease control and patient outcomes. The treatment's ability to deliver a concentrated intraprostatic dose, often in combination with external beam radiotherapy, has shown favorable results. Furthermore, brachytherapy's impact on disease-free survival and its potential in reducing urinary and bowel toxicity have been subjects of investigation. This abstract delves into the technical aspects, patient outcomes, and emerging trends in brachytherapy for prostate cancer. By examining the current literature and research findings, we aim to shed light on the evolving role of brachytherapy in the comprehensive management of prostate cancer, emphasizing its potential as a valuable therapeutic option.

Alterations of Sexual and Erectile Functions after Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer Based on Patient-Reported Questionnaires.

The aim of the study was to compare the side effects of high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) and low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDRBT), with a particular focus on the effects on sexual functions and sexual well-being (PROMOBRA study, NCT02258087). Localized low-risk and low-intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients were treated with mono LDR (N = 123, 145 Gy dose) or mono HDR brachytherapy (N = 117, 19/21 Gy). Prior to the treatment and during follow-up (at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after treatment, and then annually after two years), patients completed patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) questionnaires EORTC QLQ-PR-25, International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), and IIEF-5 (SHIM). We compared the patients in different group breakdowns (HDR vs. LDR, hormone naïve and hormone-receiving HDR vs. LDR, hormone naïve and hormone-receiving patients in general, and 19 Gy HDR vs. 21 Gy HDR). In the hormone-naive LDR group, erectile function, orgasm function, sexual desire, satisfaction with intercourse, and overall satisfaction functions significantly decreased compared to baseline throughout the whole follow-up period. However, there were significant decreases in function at a maximum of three time points after HDR therapy without hormone therapy. In hormone-receiving patients, the orgasm function was significantly better in the HDR group at multiple time points compared to the baseline, and sexual desire improved at four time points. According to our results, both LDRBT and HDRBT can be safely administered to patients with localized prostate cancer. In hormone-naive patients, the HDR group showed only recovering decreases in sexual functions, while the LDR group showed a lasting decline in multiple areas. Thus, HDR appears to be more advantageous to hormone-naive patients.

Brachytherapy for high grade prostate cancer induces distinct changes in circulating CD4 and CD8 T cells – Implications for systemic control

This exploratory study is a follow up to our previous investigation of immune response in the circulation of high-grade Gleason 9 prostate cancer patients treated with EBRT + BT compared to EBRT alone. Notably, EBRT + BT demonstrates the potential to elicit an effect on CD4/CD8 ratio which may have attributed to improved clinical response to therapy. Our findings show promise for leveraging circulating immune cells as predictive biomarkers for radiotherapy response.

Urinary tract symptoms that should be improved to enhance post-operative urinary quality of life in patients treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer: An importance-performance analysis.

To evaluate international prostate symptom score and urinary quality of life in patients with prostate cancer who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy, and to identify lower urinary tract symptoms that must be improved to enhance post-operative urinary quality of life and factors associated with lower urinary tract symptoms. This study included 193 patients who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy alone (145 Gy). Importance-performance analysis was conducted to identify lower urinary tract symptoms that should be prioritized to improve urinary quality of life. Association between lower urinary tract symptom scores and each factor was investigated. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate dosimetric parameters related to lower urinary tract symptom score to predict an average score of ≥ 3. Cut-off values were determined. One to nine months post-implantation was a period of significantly increased urinary quality of life scores compared with baseline (p < 0.05 each). The importance-performance analysis conducted for 1-9 months revealed that frequency, nocturia, and weak stream required improvement. Multivariate analysis showed that each lower urinary tract symptom score presented a significant association with its baseline value (p < 0.001 each, positive correlation). Frequency, incomplete emptying, urgency, and straining scores were significantly associated with prostate volume, whereas weak stream and intermittency scores were associated with dose covering 90% of the prostate and dose covering 90% of the urethra, respectively (p < 0.05 each, positive correlations). Cut-off values for these doses were 167.01 Gy and 136.84 Gy, respectively. This study highlights the importance of prioritizing specific lower urinary tract symptoms for improvement in post-operative urinary quality of life, and identifies the associated factors that can help in personalized treatment planning and goal-setting for better patient satisfaction.

Patterns of care for brachytherapy in Japan.

This study aimed to assess the current state of brachytherapy (BT) resources, practices and resident education in Japan. A nationwide survey was undertaken encompassing 177 establishments facilitating BT in 2022. Questionnaires were disseminated to each BT center, and feedback through online channels or postal correspondence was obtained. The questionnaire response rate was 90% (159/177), and every prefecture had a response in at least one center. The number of centers in each prefecture ranged from 0.6 to 3.6 (median: 1.3) per million population. The annual number of patients in each center ranged from 0 to 272 (median: 31). While most prefectures provided intracavitary (IC) BT for gynecological cancers and interstitial (IS) BT for prostate cancer, only one-third of the prefectures provided IS BT for cancer sites other than the prostate. The institutional image-guided BT implementation rate was 71%. IC and IS BT was performed for 15.4% of IC BT cases of gynecological cancer. Only 47% of the BT training centers answered that they could provide adequate training in BT for residents. The most common reason for this finding was the insufficient number of patients in each center. The results show that, although BT has achieved uniformity in terms of facility penetration, new technologies are not yet widespread enough. Furthermore, IS BT, which requires advanced skills, is limited to a few BT centers, and considerable number of BT training centers do not have sufficient caseloads to provide the necessary experience for their residents.

Toward a deep learning-based magnetic resonance imaging only workflow for postimplant dosimetry in I-125 seed brachytherapy for prostate cancer

Background and purposeThe current standard imaging-technique for creating postplans in seed prostate brachytherapy is computed tomography (CT), that is associated with additional radiation exposure and poor soft tissue contrast. To establish a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) only workflow combining improved tissue contrast and high seed detectability, a deep learning-approach for automatic seed segmentation on MRI-scans was developed. Material and methodsPatients treated with I-125 seed brachytherapy received a postplan-CT and a 1.5 T MRI-scan on nominal day 30 after implantation. For MRI-based seed visualization, DIXON-sequences were acquired and deep learning-based quantitative susceptibility maps (QSM) were generated from 3D-gradient-echo-sequences from 20 patients. Seed segmentations created on CT served as ground truth. For automatic seed segmentation on MRI, a 3D nnU-net model was trained using QSM and DIXON, both solely and combined. ResultsOf the implanted seeds 94.8 ± 2.4% were detected with deep learning automatic segmentation entrained on both QSM and DIXON data. Models trained on the individual sequence data-sets performed worse with detection rates of 87.5 ± 2.6% or 88.6 ± 7.5% for QSM and DIXON respectively. The seed centers identified on CT versus QSM and DIXON were on average 1.8 ± 1.3 mm apart. Postimplant dosimetry for evaluation of positioning inaccuracies revealed only small variations of up to 0.4 ± 4.26 Gy in D90 (dose 90% of the prostate receives) between the standard CT-approach and our MRI-only workflow. ConclusionThe proposed deep learning-based MRI-only workflow provided a promisingly accurate and robust seed localization and thus has the potential to compete with current state-of-the-art CT-based postimplant dosimetry in the future.

Clinical Efficacy and Openness to New Challenges of Low Dose Rate Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer.

Over a century ago, low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy was introduced to treat prostate cancer (PCa). Since then, it has been widely applied worldwide, including in East Asia. LDR brachytherapy has been performed in 88 institutes in Japan. Beneficial clinical outcomes of LDR brachytherapy for intermediate-to-high-risk PCa have been demonstrated in large clinical trials. These clinical outcomes were achieved through advances in methods, such as urological precise needle puncture and seed placement, and the quantitative decision making regarding radiological parameters by radiation oncologists. The combined use of LDR brachytherapy with other therapeutic modalities, such as external beam radiation and androgen deprivation therapy, for the clinical risk classification of PCa has led to better anticancer treatment efficacy. In this study, we summarized basic LDR brachytherapy findings that should remain unchanged and be passed down in urology departments. We also discussed the applications of LDR brachytherapy for PCa in various clinical settings, including focal and salvage therapies. In addition, we highlighted technologies associated with brachytherapy that are under development.

P047 - Long-term results of LDR brachytherapy in localized prostate cancer

P047 - Long-term results of LDR brachytherapy in localized prostate cancer

Trimodality Therapy With Iodine-125 Brachytherapy, External Beam Radiation Therapy, and Short- or Long-Term Androgen Deprivation Therapy for High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer: Results of a Multicenter, Randomized Phase 3 Trial (TRIP/TRIGU0907)

This phase 3 randomized investigation was designed to determine whether 30 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was superior to 6 months of ADT when combined with brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for localized high-risk prostate cancer. This study was conducted at 37 hospitals on men aged 40 to 79 years, with stage T2c-3a, prostate-specific antigen >20 ng/mL, or Gleason score >7, who received 6 months of ADT combined with iodine-125 brachytherapy followed by EBRT. After stratification, patients were randomly assigned to either no further treatment (short arm) or 24 months of adjuvant ADT (long arm). According to the Phoenix definition of failure, the primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of biochemical progression. Secondary endpoints included clinical progression, metastasis, salvage treatment, disease-specific mortality, overall survival, and grade 3+ adverse events. An intention-to-treat analysis was conducted using survival estimates determined using competing risk analyses. Of 332 patients, 165 and 167 were randomly assigned to the short and long arms, respectively. The median follow-up period was 9.2 years. The cumulative incidence of biochemical progression at 7 years was 9.0% (95% CI, 5.5-14.5) and 8.0% (4.7-13.5) in the short and long arms, respectively (P=.65). The outcomes of secondary endpoints did not differ significantly between the arms. Incidence rates of endocrine- and radiation-related grade 3+ adverse events for the short versus long arms were 0.6 versus 1.8% (P=.62) and 1.2 versus 0.6% (P=.62), respectively. Both treatment arms showed similar efficacy among selected populations with high-risk features. The toxicity of the trimodal therapy was acceptable. The present investigation, designed as a superiority trial, failed to demonstrate that 30-month ADT yielded better biochemical control than 6-month ADT when combined with brachytherapy and EBRT. Therefore, a noninferiority study is warranted to obtain further evidence supporting these preliminary results.

A Pilot Study of an Interactive Virtual Tour Tool for Patient Education Prior to Undergoing High-Dose Rate Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer.

High-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy for treatment of prostate cancer is an invasive procedure that can be associated with patient anxiety. Patient education regarding the procedure can allow for better informed decision-making while also decreasing anxiety. We sought to develop and assess the utility of an interactive virtual tour tool that portrays a 360-degree view of the HDR brachytherapy patient experience, with the goals of providing patient education, decreasing patient anxiety, and assisting in wayfinding on the procedure day. Using a 360-degree camera, we captured multiple photographs that depicted the various hospital locations that a patient would navigate through on the day of their HDR brachytherapy procedure, including the medical center lobby, pre-operative/post-operative units, and the brachytherapy suite. We then compiled these 360-degree photographs using virtual tour software, to allow users to navigate throughout the locations. We added informational text, spoken audio, and videos associated with key staff, objects, and the brachytherapy procedure that allow the users to interact with and learn about these various components within the virtual tour. This tool was accessible via a website link on a computer, tablet, or smartphone and was provided at the time of consult to patients who were planning to undergo HDR brachytherapy for prostate cancer. A questionnaire assessing the tool's ease of use, educational value, wayfinding utility, and ability to improve anxiety and treatment decision-making was conducted prior to and after their procedure. Preliminary feedback from healthy volunteers is highly positive, with users finding that the tool is easily accessible, user-friendly, improves understanding of HDR brachytherapy, simulates the treatment experience accurately, helps with wayfinding, and has the potential to decrease patient anxiety and increase comfort with the treatment decision. Data from the patient questionnaires are being collected and will be analyzed. A 360-degree virtual tour tool allows for an easily accessible, immersive, and interactive method of patient education on an invasive, anxiety-associated procedure. This has the potential to decrease patient anxiety and improve comfort regarding treatment decision-making. This tool may be applied toward other relatively involved radiotherapy modalities, including gynecologic HDR brachytherapy, respiratory-gated treatments, and CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery.

Toxicity and Patient Reported Quality of Life after PSMA-PET and mpMRT-Based Focal Dose Escalated Definitive Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer Patients: 2-Year Follow-Up of the HypoFocal Phase II Trial

The prospective, 2-armed non-randomized HypoFocal phase II trial investigates the safety and feasibility of focal dose escalated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) for prostate cancer (PCa) patients based on PSMA-PET and multiparametric MRI. This approach improves tumor coverage and thus putatively treatment effectiveness but leads to larger boost volumes. Here we present toxicity and patient reported quality of life (QoL) results after 2 years follow-up (FU) MATERIALS/METHODS: Patients with intermediate- or high-risk PCa and cN0/cM0 stage were included. Patients in arm A received 60 Gy in 20 fractions to the prostate with an integrated boost of up to 75 Gy. Patients in arm B received one session HDR-BT with 15 Gy to the prostate and a boost of up to 19 Gy, followed by EBRT of 44 Gy in 20 fractions. Boost volumes were defined by PSMA-PET and mpMRI based on validated approaches. Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity (CTCAE v5.0) and QoL with IPSS and EORTC questionnaires (QLQ30 and PR25) were assessed. Fifty patients were treated in both arms in two centers (Freiburg and Berlin). Table 1 shows patients characteristics. In arm, A grade 2 GU and GI toxicity rates after 2 years were 8% and 4%. There were no grade 3 GU toxicities. Two patients experienced grade 3 GI toxicities due to multifactorial causes. In Arm B grade 2 GU and GI toxicity rates after 2 years were 17% and 0%. No grade 3 toxicities were observed in arm B. Toxicities were not statistically significantly different between baseline and 2y FU (p>0.055). QoL analysis was performed with patients with available questionnaires at baseline and 2y FU (12-15 in Arm A and 13-15 in Arm B). Only bowel function (p = 0.0005, median 4 vs 25 points) in Arm A and sexual- (p = 0.016, median 25 vs 50 points) and bowel function (p = 0.004, median 0 vs 8 points) and dyspnea (p = 0.031, median 0 vs 0 points) in Arm B decreased significantly after 2 year FU. Other QoL items were not significantly different. Bowel symptoms were significantly worse in Arm A compared to Arm B (p = 0.003). Median PSA values after 2 years were 0.23 ng/ml in Arm A and 0.33 ng/ml in Arm B. Despite large boost volumes, the 2 years FU of the HypoFocal-Phase II trials shows no significantly increased GU and GU toxicities compared to baseline symptoms. Patients reported about a good QoL but increased bowel symptoms after 2 years, particularly if treated with EBRT only. Implementation of PSMA-PET into focal dose escalated radiotherapy approaches appears safe and feasible. However, radioproctitis demands careful management. The current PSA values suggest a highly effective therapy, but longer FU is needed to evaluate oncological outcomes. The HypoFocal-SBRT phase III trial will evaluate the PSMA-PET and mpMRI-based focal dose escalated SBRT.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Brachytherapy and Cancer Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review

To assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use of brachytherapy as a treatment modality in patients with gynecologic and prostate cancers including treatment delays, increased burden of mortality and associated clinical outcomes. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Databases were searched for studies published through January 2023 using MeSH terms and keywords related to "COVID and brachytherapy". Inclusion criteria included all studies reporting on the impact of COVID-19 on treatment delay, treatment omission, recurrence rates and clinical outcomes in patients requiring brachytherapy for prostate or gynecologic cancers. Data were extracted from two pairs of independent reviewers. Of the 292 screened records, 8 retrospective studies met the eligibility criteria and were selected. A total of 15,879 patients were included, of which 829 brachytherapy patients were identified. An Italian study reported an increase in the use of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) in patients with uterine cancers during the lockdown period while the use of vaginal cuff brachytherapy remained stable. Hypofractionated regimens were the preferred approach in RT centers worldwide. Intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer was limited to 3-4 fractions to limit personnel and patient exposure. RT treatment delay was the most common COVID-related care change ranging between 19% and 53% followed by treatment omission (2-28%). Causes of treatment delays and omissions were multifactorial: patient fear, COVID-19 infection, barriers to accessing care and operating room closures. Two studies reported modified brachytherapy approaches using single-application (SA) rather than multiple applications (MA) approaches with excellent local control, shorter overall treatment time, but at the expense of increased grade ≥2 vaginal, genitourinary and gastrointestinal events. For cervical cancer patients, overall treatment time (OTT) was significantly impacted by COVID-19 as reported by 2 studies from India. OTT >60 days occurred in 40-53% of patients with COVID-19 infection being the main cause of treatment delays of up to 3 weeks. This is the first systematic review to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on brachytherapy in patients with gynecologic and prostate cancers. Although many expert consensus recommendations have been published during the pandemic regarding radiation therapy, few studies evaluated its clinical impact on brachytherapy delivery and patient outcomes. The impact of the pandemic on gynecologic and prostate cancers is yet to be determined as well as the long-term outcomes on patients treated during the lockdown period.

Высокомощностная брахитерапия в монорежиме у пациентов с локализованным раком предстательной железы.

Introduction. Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer among men. In Russia the number of patients with stage I-II prostate cancer increased from 47,7% in 2010 to 60,7% in 2021. One of the main methods of treatment of localized prostate cancer is high-dose-rate brachytherapy, which today provides high accuracy of prostate dose coverage and minimizes the impact on nearby risk organs. Within ever-increasing publications, high-dose-rate brachytherapy is considered as a method of safe and effective radical treatment of prostate cancer. Materials and methods. Relevant publications were searched for in the PubMed and е-Library databases with the use of the keywords «brachytherapy», «highdose-rate brachytherapy», «brachytherapy as monotherapy». As a result of the search, 52 sources were selected and included in the given literature review. Results and discussion. The first report on the use of brachytherapy as monotherapy appeared in 2000 where published the results of treatment and demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of the method. Despite the large number of studies conducted all over the world with various options of dose delivery per fraction, the optimal dose and fractionation mode for high-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy have not been determined yet. Conclusions. Currently high-dose-rate brachytherapy of localized prostate cancer as monotherapy has become widespread. However, the available modern data on fractionation modes require further study and research.

Boundary delineation in transrectal ultrasound images for region of interest of prostate

Accurate and robust prostate segmentation in transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) images is of great interest for ultrasound-guided brachytherapy for prostate cancer. However, the current practice of manual segmentation is difficult, time-consuming, and prone to errors. To overcome these challenges, we developed an accurate prostate segmentation framework (A-ProSeg) for TRUS images. The proposed segmentation method includes three innovation steps: (1) acquiring the sequence of vertices by using an improved polygonal segment-based method with a small number of radiologist-defined seed points as prior points; (2) establishing an optimal machine learning-based method by using the improved evolutionary neural network; and (3) obtaining smooth contours of the prostate region of interest using the optimized machine learning-based method. The proposed method was evaluated on 266 patients who underwent prostate cancer brachytherapy. The proposed method achieved a high performance against the ground truth with a Dice similarity coefficient of 96.2% ± 2.4%, a Jaccard similarity coefficient of 94.4% ± 3.3%, and an accuracy of 95.7% ± 2.7%; these values are all higher than those obtained using state-of-the-art methods. A sensitivity evaluation on different noise levels demonstrated that our method achieved high robustness against changes in image quality. Meanwhile, an ablation study was performed, and the significance of all the key components of the proposed method was demonstrated.