Abstract Background The prevalence of SBS is 3-4 per million. It occurs in about 15% of adult patients who undergo intestinal resection, with 3/4th of these cases resulting from massive intestinal resection and 1/4th from multiple sequential resections. About 70% of patients in whom SBS develops are discharged from the hospital and a similar percentage remain alive a year later. This improved survival rate has been achieved primarily by the ability to deliver long-term nutritional support. Objective To compare between Serial Transverse Enteroplasty (STEP) and Longitudinal Intestinal Lengthening and Tailoring (LILT) in the incidence of complications and clinical prognosis regarding morbidity and mortality in patients with Short Bowel Syndrome (SBS). Patients and Methods The search was carried out using the electronic national library of medicine PubMed database, Cochrane library and manual reference of articles published on serial transverse enteroplasty (STEP) versus longitudinal intestinal lengthening and tailoring (LILT) in management of patients with SBS. Conclusive search was done and duplicate studies were excluded. Data Sources Medline databases (PubMed, Medscape, ScienceDirect. EMF-Portal) and all materials available on the Internet till 2022. Results LILT and STEP are both valuable treatment strategies used in the management of pediatric SBS. However, currently, it is not possible to advise surgeons on accurate patient selection and to predict the result of either intervention. There is very limited published data on bowel lengthening procedure exclusively in adults. Most reported series exclusively or predominantly discuss the pediatric population with some adults included in one series and two additional single case reports. Conclusion Both STEP and LILT are potentially safe and effective methods for the treatment of SBS, under the conditions that the surgical techniques required have been mastered and the indications for surgery are observed. This review should be a gateway to open the scope on the field of Autologous Intestinal Reconstruction Surgeries (AIRS) and plan for a more detailed prospective studies with close monitoring of the data regarding outcomes, complications and follow up.
Read full abstract