Bounded-error Quantum Query Complexity Research Articles

An Optimal Separation of Randomized and Quantum Query Complexity

We prove that for every decision tree, the absolute values of the Fourier coefficients of a given order sum to at most , where is the number of variables, is the tree depth, and is an absolute constant. This bound is essentially tight and settles a conjecture due to Tal [Towards optimal separations between quantum and randomized query complexities, in Proceedings of the Sixty-First Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 2020, pp. 228–239]. The bounds prior to our work degraded rapidly with , becoming trivial already at . As an application, we obtain, for every integer , a partial Boolean function on bits that has bounded-error quantum query complexity at most and randomized query complexity . This separation of bounded-error quantum versus randomized query complexity is best possible, by the results of Aaronson and Ambainis [SIAM J. Comput., 47 (2018), pp. 982–1038] and Bravyi et al. [Classical Algorithms for Forrelation, arXiv preprint, 2021]. Prior to our work, the best known separation was polynomially weaker: versus for any [A. Tal, Towards optimal separations between quantum and randomized query complexities, in Proceedings of the Sixty-First Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 2020, pp. 228–239]. As another application, we obtain an essentially optimal separation of versus for bounded-error quantum versus randomized communication complexity for any . The best previous separation was polynomially weaker: versus (this is implicit in [A. Tal, Towards optimal separations between quantum and randomized query complexities, in Proceedings of the Sixty-First Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 2020, pp. 228–239]).

How Low can Approximate Degree and Quantum Query Complexity be for Total Boolean Functions?

It has long been known that any Boolean function that depends on n input variables has both degree and exact quantum query complexity of Ω(log n), and that this bound is achieved for some functions. In this paper, we study the case of approximate degree and bounded-error quantum query complexity. We show that for these measures, the correct lower bound is Ω(log n/ log log n), and we exhibit quantum algorithms for two functions where this bound is achieved.

A strong direct product theorem for quantum query complexity

We show that quantum query complexity satisfies a strong direct product theorem. This means that computing k copies of a function with fewer than k times the quantum queries needed to compute one copy of the function implies that the overall success probability will be exponentially small in k. For a boolean function f, we also show an XOR lemma—computing the parity of k copies of f with fewer than k times the queries needed for one copy implies that the advantage over random guessing will be exponentially small. We do this by showing that the multiplicative adversary method, which inherently satisfies a strong direct product theorem, characterizes bounded-error quantum query complexity. In particular, we show that the multiplicative adversary bound is always at least as large as the additive adversary bound, which is known to characterize bounded-error quantum query complexity.

Quantum Query Complexity of Some Graph Problems

Quantum algorithms for graph problems are considered, both in the adjacency matrix model and in an adjacency list-like array model. We give almost tight lower and upper bounds for the bounded error quantum query complexity of Connectivity, Strong Connectivity, Minimum Spanning Tree, and Single Source Shortest Paths. For example we show that the query complexity of Minimum Spanning Tree is in Theta(n^{3/2}) in the matrix model and in Theta(sqrt{nm}) in the array model, while the complexity of Connectivity is also in Theta(n^{3/2}) in the matrix model, but in Theta(n) in the array model. The upper bounds utilize search procedures for finding minima of functions under various conditions.

A lower bound on the quantum query complexity of read-once functions

We establish a lower bound of Ω( n ) on the bounded-error quantum query complexity of read-once Boolean functions. The result is proved via an inductive argument, together with an extension of a lower bound method of Ambainis. Ambainis’ method involves viewing a quantum computation as a mapping from inputs to quantum states (unit vectors in a complex inner-product space) which changes as the computation proceeds. Initially the mapping is constant (the state is independent of the input). If the computation evalutes the function f then at the end of the computation the two states associated with any f-distinguished pair of inputs (having different f values) are nearly orthogonal. Thus the inner product of their associated states must have changed from 1 to nearly 0. For any set of f-distinguished pairs of inputs, the sum of the inner products of the corresponding pairs of states must decrease significantly during the computation, By deriving an upper bound on the decrease in such a sum, during a single step, for a carefully selected set of input pairs, one can obtain a lower bound on the number of steps. We extend Ambainis’ bound by considering general weighted sums of f-distinguished pairs. We then prove our result for read-once functions by induction on the number of variables, where the induction step involves a careful choice of weights depending on f to optimize the lower bound attained.