Simulation of flow at the pore scale is of paramount importance to characterize the behavior of a fluid in a porous medium. The pore scale simulations allow us to investigate pore-scale mechanisms governing field-scale flow attributes. One of the big challenges in the field of pore-scale simulation is reliable modeling of the no-slip boundary condition, which in the lattice Boltzmann method is usually defined by the bounce-back boundary condition. In the present study, the effect of the magic parameter value on the simulation results was investigated by considering the inherent error in micro-CT images, and finally, the results were compared with the Navier-Stokes method ones. Furthermore, determining the amplitude of the error due to improper image resolution is one of the challenges in simulating micro-CT images, which by defining the magic parameter, analyzing its behavior and effect on results, a proper criterion to estimate the error amplitude of flow characteristics due to the micro-CT imaging is presented. In this study, based on the interpolation between different angles of the boundaries, an ideal magic parameter Λ = 0.21 was presented, which can simulate complex geometries with the least error in terms of the accuracy of the bounce-back boundary condition. It can also be found that for reasonable values of the magic parameter, the error amplitude due to the magic parameter is a subset of the imaging error amplitude. That is D∧⊆DCT. A reasonable value for the magic parameter depends on the number of nodes in the pores, but the range 0.01 <Λ <1.0 is highly reliable, and the range 0.01 <Λ <2.0 is also recommended in networks with a very high number of nodes per unit diameter of the pore. At these intervals, the magic parameter error is always less than the imaging error. Moreover, by defining the ideal boundary in micro-CT images, the results of LBM and NSE methods are compared. The results reveal that the permeability value obtained by the NSE method is always slightly less than the value obtained from the LBM in the magic parameter 0.21 under the same conditions; however, both responses fall within the imaging error range. However, the LBM results at Λ = 0.21 were closer to the ideal and median boundary results in micro-CT images. Finally, the comparison of the numerical results with the experimental ones illustrated that Considering the response that fits the ideal imaging boundary as the most optimal response that can be achieved in the LBM method by choosing Λ = 0.21 to some extent is a logical and appropriate idea.
Read full abstract