200 Reviews Thomas Egerton; Johann P. Sommerville uses an analysis of Pseudo-Martyr to rebut modern accounts of Donne as politically subversive and residually Catholic; David Cunnington deals with 'professions' of friendship to female patrons; while Alison Shell provides evidence forcollaboration between Donne and Sir Edward Hoby. The second section, on 'Professing the Word', is perhaps the strongest and most focused in the volume. It opens with a piece by Jeanne Shami on Donne's vocational identity and the politics of labelling in seventeenth-century religious polemic?which incidentally offerssome pertinent reflections on modern scholars' own professional habits of ca? tegorization; Mary Morrisey offersan in-depth analysis of three sermons preached at Paul's Cross; and Peter E. McCulloch considers Donne as a preacher at the courts of James I and Charles I, looking at the complexity of the court as a venue, at Donne's theological position, and at the canon of his sermons. Finally, we have 'Professing the Body', in which James Cannon discusses Donne's 1623 Encaenia sermon and the theology of consecration, Stephen Pender investigates 'medical semiotics', and Jessica Martin examines Walton's Life of Donne as mediated through Donne's own self-representations and language. This is an intriguing collection of essays, lucidly introduced by David Colclough. It fully bears out his argument that scholars need to pay attention to the full range of Donne's writings, and also suggests a number of ways in which we might care to rethink the relationship between the amateur and the professional in seventeenthcentury culture. It is, finally,a handsomely produced volume, although something very peculiar has happened to the parentheses in chapters 6 and 11 of this re? viewer's copy. University of St Andrews Alex Davis William Blake's Comic Vision. By Nick Rawlinson. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 2003. xiii + 292pp. ?40. ISBN 0-333-74565-5. It is true of Blake, as of Dostoevsky, that his intensity and scale of vision occlude a salient fact: that he is a hugely funny writer. In Europe, Isaac Newton (of all people) seizes and blows the trumpet of secular apocalypse, whereupon the angelic hosts (newly endowed with gravitational mass?) fall from the sky. From Songs of Experi? ence: 'My Pretty Rose Tree' is marital sitcom-farce; in 'The Fly' we hear the cosmic bitterness of a Gloucester as filteredthrough the mentality of a member of the Drones Club. Despite their vast symbolic freight, Urizen and Orc as they appear in America and The Four Zoas constitute one of literature's great comic duos. One comes to Nick Rawlinson's book, therefore, with great expectations. In one respect these are borne out: Rawlinson's mastery of the scholarship, both critical opinion and many dimensions of historical context, is overwhelmingly impressive. In most other ways, though, the book delivers far less than its title leads us to expect. It deals almost entirely with the early works of Blake and, of these, mainly with relatively minor ones. We get thirtypages on Poetical Sketches and Tiriel, sixty-five pages on An Island in theMoon, only twenty on Songs ofInnocence and ofExperience, and next to nothing on The Book of Thel (a work possessing, among other dimensions, a comic one) or the Lambeth prophecies. On the long epics we get only a few pages near the end. Since Rawlinson argues that comedy is for Blake a key visionary strategy, his argument is weakened to the extent that he focuses on relatively peripheral works. In making this argument Rawlinson means something rather idiosyncratic. For him comedy seems to have little to do with ordinary laughter; his book does not often invite us to experience hilarity,or even amusement. Nor is he much interested even in the hard-surfaced comedy that serves satire, a mode from which Rawlinson tends MLRy ioo.i, 2005 201 to distance Blake, satire being too exclusively negative, whereas Blake's intent is, ul? timately, to go beyond the corrosive to affirmativespiritual values. For Rawlinson, the heart of Blakean comedy is the 'carnivalesque', a kind of egalitarian, communally founded, celebratory social liturgy. (Rawlinson is at some pains to locate the origins of the carnivalesque in religion.) The question, for...
Read full abstract