Bone-patellar Tendon-bone Anterior Cruciate Ligament Research Articles

Comparison of Revision ACL Reconstruction Using Iliotibial Band Augmented With Allograft Versus Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft With Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis.

Bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is one of the conventional techniques in the revision setting especially after a primary hamstring tendon graft. The use of the iliotibial band (ITB) augmented with allograft (AG) is an encouraging graft alternative for ACLR in terms of clinical and biomechanical data in the literature. To compare the clinical outcomes of BTB graft with lateral extra-articular tenodesis, modified Lemaire (BTB-LET), and an ITB graft augmented with hamstring AG (ITB-AG) in the setting of revision ACLR. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Descriptive data and clinical outcomes were prospectively collected from patients who underwent revision ACLR with either the BTB-LET or ITB-AG technique between 2012 and 2020 and who had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The clinical outcomes were assessed by the Lysholm, Tegner, Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee evaluation form, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Return to sports, complications, and revisions were also analyzed. A total of 167 patients were included, with 106 patients in the BTB-LET group and 61 patients in the ITB-AG group. There were no significant group differences in sociodemographic characteristics; however, the mean follow-up was significantly longer in the BTB-LET compared with the ITB-AG group (52.0 vs 38.8 months, respectively; P = .0001). There were no significant differences in postoperative outcome scores; however, patients in the ITB-AG group had a higher rate of return to competitive pivoting sports (32.8% vs 17.9%; P = .0288) and a higher overall rate of return to preinjury sport (63.9% vs 47.2%; P = .0365). Complications, including revisions for meniscal or chondral lesions and retears (8 [8.3%] in the BTB-LET group and 2 [4.0%] in the ITB-AG group), were not significantly different. All retears were due to sports-related accidents. In this study, ITB-AG was not different from BTB-LET in terms of functional outcomes scores but allowed better return to sport rate. Performing ITB-AG reconstruction in the setting of revision ACLR appears to be safe, effective, and associated with a satisfying return-to-sports rate.

The "N+10 Rule" to Avoid Graft-Tunnel Mismatch in Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone ACL Reconstruction Using Independent Femoral Tunnel Drilling.

Graft-tunnel mismatch (GTM) is a common problem in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) using bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) grafts. Application of the "N+10 rule" in endoscopic ACLR with BPTB grafts will result in acceptable tibial tunnel length (TTL), minimizing GTM. Controlled laboratory study. Endoscopic BPTB ACLR was conducted on the paired knees of 10 cadaveric specimens using 2 independent femoral tunnel drilling techniques-accessory anteromedial portal and flexible reamer. The graft bone blocks were trimmed to 10 × 20 mm, and the intertendinous distance (represented by "N") between the bone blocks was measured. The N+10 rule was used to set the angle of the ACL tibial tunnel guide to the appropriate number of degrees for drilling. The amount of excursion or recession of the tibial bone plug in relation to the anterior tibial cortical aperture was measured in both flexion and extension. A GTM threshold of ±7.5 mm was set based on prior studies. The mean BPTB ACL intertendinous distance was 47.5 ± 5.5 mm. The mean measured intra-articular distance was 27.2 ± 3 mm. Using the N+10 rule, the mean total (flexion plus extension) GTM was 4.3 ± 3.2 mm (GTM in flexion, 4.9 ± 3.6 mm; GTM in extension, 3.8 ± 3.5 mm). In 18 of 20 (90%) cadaveric knees, the mean total GTM fell within the ±7.5-mm threshold. When comparing the actual measured TTL to the calculated TTL, there was a mean difference of 5.4 ± 3.9 mm. When comparing femoral tunnel drilling techniques, the total GTM for the accessory anteromedial portal technique was 2.1 ± 3.7 mm, while the total GTM for the flexible reamer technique was 3.6 ± 5.4 mm (P = .5). The N+10 rule resulted in an acceptable mean GTM in both flexion and extension. The mean difference between the measured versus calculated TTL using the N+10 rule was also acceptable. The N+10 rule is a simple and effective intraoperative strategy for achieving desired TTL regardless of patient-specific factors to avoid excessive GTM in endoscopic BPTB ACLR using independent femoral tunnel drilling.

Functional Anterior Knee Pain and Return to Sport Following Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background: Bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a frequently used technique but has been associated with a high incidence of postoperative anterior knee pain. However, previous studies have not evaluated if this anterior knee pain is functionally limiting for patients. This study introduces the concept of functional anterior knee pain, or kneecap pain that limits patients' ability to return to their prior level of activity or sport. Methods: We reviewed BPTB ACL reconstructions from April 2013 to May 2017. Patients included in the analysis had a minimum of 1 year of clinical follow-up and 3 years of survey follow-up. Statistical analyses were performed using paired t tests and binomial test. Results: Sixty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared to the mean preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain score of 6.1, patients reported statistically significant reductions in VAS scores at 1 year and 3 years postoperatively to 0.9 and 1.8, respectively (P<0.01). The incidence (28.4%) of anterior knee pain was highest at the 3-month time point. This incidence decreased to 6.0% at 1 year and 7.5% at 3 years postoperatively. At 3 years postoperatively, 94% (63/67) of the patients in this study were not limited by functional anterior knee pain and returned to preoperative levels of activity and sport. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this investigation is the first to define and quantify the relationship between postoperative anterior knee pain and resultant functional limitations. This study shows that ACL reconstruction with BPTB autograft was not significantly associated with functional anterior knee pain in our population and that the incidence of postoperative anterior knee pain following BPTB ACL reconstruction may be less than previously reported.

Low percentage of patients passed the ‘Back in Action’ test battery 9 months after bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BackgroundAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is recommended in patients who intend to return to high-level sports. However, there is only a 55–80% return to pre-injury level of sports after ACL reconstruction, with a re-injury rate up to 20%. The aim of this study was to determine the percentage of patients passing the Back in Action (BIA) test 9 months after primary bone-patellar-tendon-bone (BPTB) ACL reconstruction, and evaluate the association between passing the BIA test and patient reported outcome measurements (PROMs). MethodsPatients underwent the BIA test 9 months after BPTB ACL reconstruction. In total 103 patients were included. Passing the BIA test (PASSED-group) was defined as a normal or higher score at all sub-tests with limb symmetry index (LSI) ≥90% for the dominant leg and LSI >80% for the non-dominant leg. Patients who did not meet these criteria were defined as the FAILED-group. PROMs included the International Knee Documentation Committee, Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury. ResultsEighteen patients (17.5%) passed the BIA test 9 months after BPTB ACL reconstruction. PROMs were not statistically significant different between the PASSED- and FAILED-group. ConclusionLow percentage of patients passed the BIA test 9 months after BPTB ACL reconstruction. Although current PROMs cut-off values were met, the BIA test results show persistent functional deficits. Therefore, the BIA test could be of additional value in the decision-making process regarding return to sport (RTS). This study highlights the need for additional rehabilitation as RTS in a condition of incomplete recovery may increase the risk of re-injury. Level of evidenceII.

Poster 256: The "N+10 Rule" to Avoid Graft Tunnel Mismatch in Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Independent Femoral Tunnel Drilling

Objectives: To determine the amount of tibial graft tunnel mismatch during application of the “N+10” rule in arthroscopic assisted anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) graft using independent femoral tunnel drilling.To compare actual (measured) tibial tunnel length and desired (calculated) tibial tunnel length when using the “N+10” rule for independent femoral tunnel drilling. Methods:Twenty paired knees from 10 fresh frozen cadaveric specimens (5 female and 5 male specimens) underwent arthroscopic assisted bone-patellar tendon-bone ACL reconstruction using independent femoral tunnel drilling with either a hyperflexion accessory anteromedial portal (n=10) or flexible reamer technique (n=10). The prepared patellar tendon graft bone blocks were trimmed to 10 x 20mm for all specimens and the intertendinous distance (N) between the bone blocks was measured. The “N+10 Rule” was used to set the angle of the ACL tibial tunnel guide to the appropriate degree setting for drilling. The amount of excursion or recession of the tibial bone plug in relation to the anterior tibial cortical aperture was measured in both flexion and extension. A +/-6mm threshold was used to assess this strategy based on prior biomechanical aperture fixation studies. As a secondary outcome, the intraarticular distance (IAD) and the actual tibial tunnel length (TTL) were measured and compared to the planned TTL based on the equation: IAD + TTL = N + 20 (size of bone plug in millimeters)Results:The average BTB ACL intertendinous distance (N) was 47.5mm (SD =5.5mm). The average measured IAD was 27.2mm (SD=3.0mm). Using the “N+10 Rule”, the average mismatch of the tibial tunnel was 4.9mm (SD=3.6mm) and 3.8mm (SD=3.5mm) in flexion and extension, respectively. Both values fall within the +/- 6mm threshold. When comparing the actual measured tibial tunnel length (TTL) to the desired TTL, there was an average difference of 5.4mm (SD=3.9mm)Conclusions:The “N+10” rule resulted in an acceptable average mismatch in both flexion and extension using the threshold of +/- 6mm for 20 cadaveric knees. Measured actual TTL compared to the desired calculated TTL were acceptable 61% of the time using the same threshold. The “N+10” is a simple and effective intraoperative strategy for achieving desired tibial tunnel length to avoid excessive graft tunnel mismatch.Figure 1:Derived formula for calculating ideal tibial tunnel length (TTL) using intraarticular distance (IAD), and the known values of the intertendinous distance (N) and lengths of the bone blocks (20mm).Figure 2:Intraoperative photo of BTB ACL graft measuring intertendinous distance between the bone plugs (N=55mm). Following the "N+10" ruleFigure 3:Intraoperative photo of tibial ACL guide measurement of tibial tunnel length at 50mm with guide set to 65 degrees.Figure 4:Intraoperative photo of the ACL tibial tunnel guide positioned on the anatomic tibial footprint set to 65 degrees (N=55mm). Using this setting for the guide, the tibial tunnel measured 50mm as seen in the zoomed in photo, as per the formula.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair using cortical or anchor fixation with suture tape augmentation vs ACL reconstruction: A comparative biomechanical analysis

BackgroundThe purpose was to compare knee kinematics in a cadaveric model of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair using an adjustable-loop femoral cortical suspensory (AL-CSF) or independent bundle suture anchor fixation (IB-SAF) with suture tape augmentation to a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) ACL reconstruction. MethodsTwenty-seven cadaveric knees were randomly assigned to one of three surgical techniques: (1) ACL repair using the AL-CSF technique with suture tape augmentation, (2) ACL repair using the IB-SAF technique with suture tape augmentation, (3) ACL reconstruction using a BPTB autograft. Each specimen underwent three conditions according to the state of the ACL (native, proximal transection, repair/reconstruction) with each condition tested at four different angles of knee flexion (0°, 30°, 60°, 90°). Anterior tibial translation (ATT) and internal tibial rotation (ITR) were evaluated using 3-dimensional motion tracking software. ResultsACL transection resulted in a significant increase in ATT and ITR when compared to the native state (P < 0.001, respectively). ACL repair with the AL-CSF or IB-SAF technique as well as BPTB reconstruction restored native ATT and ITR at all tested angles of knee flexion, while showing significantly less ATT at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° as well as significantly less ITR at 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion when compared to the ACL-deficient state. There were no significant differences in ATT and ITR between the three techniques utilized. ConclusionACL repair using the AL-CSF or IB-SAF technique with suture tape augmentation as well as BPTB ACL reconstruction each restored native anteroposterior and rotational laxity, without significant differences in knee kinematics between the three techniques utilized. Level of EvidenceControlled Laboratory Study.

INTRA-ARTICULAR MORPHINE AND ROPIVACAINE INJECTION PROVIDES EFFICACIOUS ANALGESIA COMPARED TO FEMORAL NERVE BLOCK IN THE FIRST 24 HOURS POST-OPERATIVELY AFTER ACL RECONSTRUCTION WITH BTB IN AN ADOLESCENT COHORT

Background:Opioid consumption and patient satisfaction are influenced by a surgeon’s pain management protocol and the use of adjunctive pain mediators. Two commonly utilized adjunctive pain modifiers for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction include femoral nerve blockade and intra-articular injection; however, debate remains as to the most efficacious methodology.Hypothesis/Purpose:We hypothesize that intra-articular injection with ropivacaine and morphine is as efficacious as a femoral nerve block injection of ropivacaine, dexamethasone, and dexmedetomidine for post-operative pain management in the first 24 hours after bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) ACL reconstruction.Methods:Charts were retrospectively reviewed for a single pediatric orthopedic surgeon performing BTB ACL reconstructions from 2013-2019. One hundred sixteen patients were identified, of whom 58 received intra-articular injection and 58 received single shot femoral nerve block. All patients were admitted for 24 hours. Pain scores were assessed every 4 hours. Morphine milligram equivalents (MME) consumed were tabulated for each patient.Results:Opioid use was 24.3 MMEs in patients treated with intra-articular injection vs 28.5MMEs in those with peripheral block (p=0.108). Consumption of MMEs was greater in the intra-articular group in the 0-4 hours period (7.1 MMEs vs. 4.6 MMEs, p=0.008). There was significantly less MME consumption in patients receiving intra-articular injection compared with peripheral block at 16-20 and 20-24 hours (3.2 MMEs vs. 5.6 MMEs, p=0.01; 3.8 MMEs vs. 6.5 MMEs, p<0.001 respectively). Mean pain scores were not significantly different over the 24-hour period (peripheral block=2.7, intra-articular injection=3.0, p=0.19).Conclusion:Moving away from the use of peripheral nerve block as an analgesic modality may be challenging given the multidisciplinary role of pain management in these patients. However, as Ramlogan et al. succinctly noted in their recent editorial “Anterior cruciate ligament repair and peripheral nerve blocks: time to change our practice?” in the British Journal of Anesthesia, both orthopedic and anesthesia colleagues alike are beginning to recognize that it is a change that may benefit our patients. Our study strengthens this argument and shows that there is no significant difference in MME consumption between the femoral nerve block and intra-articular injection groups in the first 24 hours post-operatively. While peripheral block is associated with lower opioid consumption in the first 4 hours after surgery, patients receiving intra-articular block require less opioids 16-24 hours post-operatively. Given these findings, we propose that intra-articular injection is a viable alternative for analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing BTB ACL reconstruction.Figure 1.2.Morphine milligram equivalent consumption trend during 24-hour post-operative period. PB=peripheral nerve block; IA=intra-articular injection

Suture Tape Augmentation Improves the Biomechanical Performance of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Grafts Used for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

The purpose of this study was to investigate the time-zero biomechanical properties (stiffness, displacement, and load at failure) of bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) grafts used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with and without suture tape augmentation as a means to determine the potential clinical benefit of this technique. Eight juvenile porcine knees underwent ACL reconstruction with a human cadaveric BTB graft (control). These were compared to 8 juvenile porcine knees that underwent ACL reconstruction with a BTB graft augmented with suture tape. All knees underwent biomechanical testing utilizing a dynamic tensile testing machine. Cyclic loading between 50-250N was performed for 500 cycles at 1 Hz to simulate invivo ACL loads during the early rehabilitation phase. The grafts were displaced during load-at-failure tensile testing at 20 mm/min. Differences in graft displacement, stiffness, and load at failure for the control and suture tape augmented groups were compared with the Student t-test with a significance level of P < .05. There was no difference in graft displacement between the 2 groups. A 104% higher postcyclic stiffness was noted in the augmented group compared to the controls (augmentation: 261 ± 76 N/mm versus control 128 ± 28 N/mm, P= .002). The mean ultimate load at failure was 57% higher in the augmented group compared to controls (744 ± 219 N vs postcyclic 473 ± 169 N, respectively [P= .015]). There was no difference in mode of failure between the control knees and those augmented with suture tape, with approximately half failing from pull off of the tendon from the bone plug and half with pull out of the bone plug from the tunnel. Independent suture tape augmentation of a BTB ACL reconstruction grafts was associated with a 104% increase in graft stiffness and a 57% increase in load at failure compared to nonaugmented BTB grafts. Invivo suture tape augmentation of a BTB ACL reconstruction increases graft construct strength and stiffness, which may reduce graft failure in the clinical setting.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone graft through transtibial tunnel: Functional results after 7 years of follow-up

Background: The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is conducted to improve the stability and function of the knee. Bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) graft is still considered as one of the best grafts for ACL reconstruction. The purpose of this paper was to assess outcomes of BPTB ACL reconstruction at 7 years of follow-up. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study in which records of 26 patients, who had ACL reconstruction using BPTB graft from 2013 to 2015, were done and the outcomes of results were analyzed by clinical Tegner activity levels and Lysholm score at 6–8 years of follow-up. Results: The follow-up study has revealed excellent long-term results. Approximately 87% of 26 patients had negative pivot shift examination with the remaining 13% having grade 1 ligament laxity. Tegner activity levels were similar to preinjury levels and Lysholm score was 91. All patients were satisfied with the procedure. Conclusion: BPTB ACL reconstruction using transtibial tunnel provides a satisfactory mid-term follow-up outcome.

All-Inside Quadrupled Semitendinosus vs. BTB ACL Reconstruction in Young Athletes: RCT

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is challenging in young athletes. An important clinical question is optimal graft choice in this high-risk group. The purpose of this investigation was to compare clinical outcomes of ACL autograft reconstruction using all-inside GraftLink quadrupled semitendinosis (GraftLink) versus the “gold standard” bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) in a high-risk athletic population 24 years or younger. Skeletally mature candidates younger than 24 years old with an ACL tear were randomized into either the GraftLink (n=32) or BTB (n=32) groups and were followed for two years. MRIs were obtained at one-year follow-up, and radiographs were obtained at two-year follow-up. The primary outcome measure was KT- 1000 stability testing. Secondary outcome measures included: IKDC Knee Evaluation Form, IKDC Subjective Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Marx Activity Scale, and SF-12. At 2-year follow-up, no statistical difference existed with KT-1000 measured side to side laxity between GraftLink (0.3 ± 0.7 mm) and BTB (0.0 ± 0.8 mm) (p = 0.197). Additionally, no statistical differences between the groups were found for any secondary outcome measure or with regards to imaging findings. BTB patients reported significantly higher postoperative pain scores at days 3 (p=0.05) and 7 (p=0.018) and had significantly greater kneeling pain at 2 years (p < 0.019). A return to sport questionnaire at 2 years revealed no significant difference between the groups for returning to preoperative level of sport activity (83% GraftLink, 74% BTB; p=0.415). Two graft retears (7%; p=0.222) occurred in the GraftLink group. Three patients in the BTB group experienced ACL tears in the contralateral knee (9%; p=0.239). ACL reconstruction with all-inside quadrupled semitendinosis autograft GraftLink construct was equivalent to patellar BTB autograft based on KT-1000 stability testing and validated outcome measures, including IKDC, in athletes 24 years or younger (average age 17.7). There was no significant difference in graft retear rate or return to sport at the same preoperative level between the groups. However, there was significantly less kneeling pain in the GraftLink cohort.

Femoral Interference Screw Fixation in ACL Reconstruction Using Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Grafts.

» Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a commonly performed orthopaedic procedure with numerous reconstructive graft and fixation options. Interference screws have become one of the most commonly utilized methods of securing ACL grafts such as bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts. » The composition of interference screws has undergone substantial evolution over the past several decades, and numerous advantages and disadvantages are associated with each design. » The composition, geometry, and insertional torque of interference screws have important implications for screw biomechanics and may ultimately influence the strength, stability of graft fixation, and biologic healing in ACL reconstruction. » This article reviews the development and biomechanical properties of interference screws while examining outcomes, complications, and gaps in knowledge that are associated with the use of femoral interference screws during BPTB ACL reconstruction.

No difference in the prevalence of patellofemoral joint cartilage defects on MRI 2 years after bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions compared to the contralateral knee

No difference in the prevalence of patellofemoral joint cartilage defects on MRI 2 years after bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions compared to the contralateral knee

Comparison of Return to Pre-Injury Sport After 10 mm Size Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone (BPTB) versus 8 mm Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study with a Two-Year Follow-Up

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the reconstruction of a torn anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) with 10 mm diameter BPTB (bone-patellar tendon-bone) autograft versus 8 mm HT (hamstring tendon) autografts, to compare the ability to restore pre-injury sports activities and reduce revision risk after these procedures.Material/MethodsA prospective clinical review was performed to compare results of patients who underwent primary anatomical ACLR with 10 mm BPTB autografts with patients who underwent 8 mm diameter HT autografts, between January 2011 and January 2014.ResultsThere were 183 patients evaluated: the 8 mm HT group showed statistically significant higher knee laxity values compared to the 10 mm BPTB group (p=0.042), and significant difference were detected in subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) evaluation scores; the average subjective IKDC evaluations after two-year follow-up in the HT group was 88.45±2.8 versus 89.24±2.5 in BPTB group (p=0.047). In the evaluation of the IKDC objective protocol, results were excellent and good in 83 patients (94.3%) after BPTB and in 78 patients (82%) after HT ACLR (p<0.05). The average score on the Tegner activity scale in the HT group decreased from 6.5 at pre-injury to 5.8 at two-year follow-up (p<0.001) and from 6.7 at pre-injury to 6.5 at two-year follow-up in the BPTB group (p=0.4). The ability to restore pre-injury sports activities was higher in the BPTB group (6.5) versus the HT group (5.8) (p<0.001). Revision was required for two patients (2.2%) in the BPTB group compared with 14 patients (14.7%) in the HT group (p<0.05).ConclusionsSmaller HT graft size was a predictor of higher knee laxity and greater revision risk at two-year post primary ACL reconstruction. Larger diameter BPTB ACL grafts had a better ability to restore knee stability and greater ability to restore pre-injury sports activities.

Efficacy of β-Tricalcium Phosphate Graft into the Bone Defects after Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

This prospective pilot study investigated whether grafting β-tricalcium phosphate (B-TCP) into the bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB)-harvesting site after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction would accelerate bone and tendon regeneration in the grafted site. Overall, 19 patients agreed prospectively to undergo regular morphological and histological examinations of the B-TCP-grafted site. Postoperative radiographic, ultrasonographic, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations were performed to evaluate the grafted site at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Postoperative knee function and donor-site morbidity were assessed at 12 months using the kneeling test. A histological examination was also performed at this time Radiographic examination and MRI showed that the grafted B-TCP was completely absorbed and remodeled into normal bone structure in the tibia and patella at 6 months postoperatively. Histological and ultrasonographic examinations of all subjects showed that the grafted B-TCP was substituted by normal bone tissue, and the patellar tendon - bone junction had regenerated at 12 months postoperatively. Clinical functional knee tests showed good recovery of the donor site. All patients could perform kneeling and knee walking on hard ground. The results of this pilot study suggest that grafting B-TCP into the BPTB-harvesting site promotes the remodeling process of the bone and patellar tendon structures. This surgical treatment would decrease an incidence of the anterior knee pain after ACLR using a BPTB autograft.

Double-layer versus single-layer bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized study with 3-year follow-up.

To evaluate the clinical results of a randomized controlled trial of single-layer versus double-layer bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Fifty-eight subjects who underwent primary ACL reconstruction with a BPTB allograft were prospectively randomized into two groups: single-layer reconstruction (n=31) and double-layer reconstruction (n=27). The following evaluation methods were used: clinical examination, KT-1000 arthrometer measurement, muscle strength, Tegner activity score, Lysholm score, subjective rating scale regarding patient satisfaction and sports performance level, graft retear, contralateral ACL tear, and additional meniscus surgery. Forty-eight subjects (24 in single-layer group and 24 in double-layer group) who were followed up for 3years were evaluated. Preoperatively, there were no differences between the groups. At 3-year follow-up, the Lachman and pivot-shift test results were better in the double-layer group (P=0.019 and P<0.0001, respectively). KT measurements were better in the double-layer group (mean 2.9 versus 1.5mm; P=0.0025). The Tegner score was also better in the double-layer group (P=0.024). There were no significant differences in range of motion, muscle strength, Lysholm score, subjective rating scale, graft retear, and secondary meniscal tear. In ACL reconstruction, double-layer BPTB reconstruction was significantly better than single-layer reconstruction regarding anterior and rotational stability at 3-year follow-up. The results of KT measurements and the Lachman and pivot-shift tests were significantly better in the double-layer group, whereas there was no difference in the anterior drawer test results. The Tegner score was also better in the double-layer group; however, there were no differences in the other subjective findings.

The ACL Graft Has Different Cross-sectional Dimensions Compared With the Native ACL

Background: Impingement of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) grafts against the femoral notch and the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is thought to be influenced primarily by tunnel position and graft orientation. Recent data have implied that the native ACL is ribbon-shaped. Purpose: To evaluate the 3-dimensional shape and cross-sectional area of the native ACL versus the ACL graft and to compare the degree of impingement against the femoral notch and PCL. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Bilateral knee magnetic resonance images were analyzed for 27 patients with unilateral bone–patellar tendon–bone (BPTB) ACL reconstruction performed via transtibial or anteromedial portal femoral tunneling techniques. Three-dimensional models of the ACL, PCL, femur, and tibia were digitally rendered. The cross-sectional area and dimensions of the native ACL and the reconstructed graft were determined at 3 equally spaced locations and compared via Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests. In addition, impingement of the ACL on the PCL and femoral notch was graded in 3 groups. Chi-square or Fisher exact tests were used to compare the proportional differences of impingement of the native and reconstructed ACL on the PCL and femoral notch, respectively. All analyses were performed using 2-sided hypothesis testing, with statistical significance at P < .05. Results: Cross-sectional areas at all 3 points on the ACL graft were significantly greater than those of the native ACL (P < .001). The long- to short-axis ratio for the native ACL was significantly greater at each location compared with the corresponding locations along the ACL graft (P < .001), implying that the native ACL is “flatter” than is an ACL graft. There were 19 operated knees (70%) with contact or impingement between the ACL graft and the femoral notch compared with zero knees with a native ACL (P < .001). In addition, 22 operated knees (81%) showed contact or impingement between the ACL graft and the PCL, compared with 7 knees (26%) with a native ACL (P < .001). No significant differences in impingement frequency were noted between the transtibial and anteromedial tunneling techniques for ACL graft specimens (P > .05). Conclusion: Native ACLs have a smaller cross-sectional area, are “flatter,” and experience less incidence of impingement compared with anatomically placed BPTB ACL grafts.

Long-term results of a randomized study on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with or without a synthetic degradable augmentation device to support the autograft

The aim was to compare the outcome of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft, with and without a poly(urethane urea) augmentation device. Patients were randomized to BPTB reconstruction with a synthetic degradable augmentation device (n = 96) or without augmentation (n = 105). Follow-ups were made during 4 years after surgical treatment with the KT1000 arthrometer for objective evaluation of sagittal stability. The Tegner scoring system for assessment of physical activity level and the Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for assessment of knee-specific health were evaluated after 4 and 12 years. KT1000 tests showed a significant decrease in mean manual maximum side-to-side difference after 4 years in both patients with and those without augmentation, without any statistical difference between the groups (n.s.). Pre-injury, 76 and 80% of the patients, respectively, reported Tegner level 7-10. Pre-surgery, the corresponding figures were 6 and 5%, and at 4 years, 33 and 30 %. Twelve years after ACL reconstruction, both groups had significantly higher KOOS scores in function in sports and recreational activities (p < 0.001) and knee-related quality of life (p < 0.001) compared to before surgical treatment. In 10 patients, the augmentation device was removed, in six of these because of insufficient screw fixation to femur and in four due to swelling/hydrops. This study showed no significant difference in clinical outcome with use of an additional synthetic augmentation device in a single-bundle BPTB ACL reconstruction compared with non-augmentation, in short, intermediate, or long-term perspective. Therapeutic study, Level I.

Poly L-Lactide Co-Glycolide/β-Tricalcium Phosphate Interference Screw Fixation for Bone-Patellar Tendon Bone Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

The objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical effectiveness and radiographic response of a poly (l-lactide co-glycolide)/β-tricalcium phosphate (PlLA/PGA/β-TCP) interference screw used in bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. A prospective, consecutive series of 104 patellar tendon bone-tendon-bone ACL reconstructions fixed with PLLA/PGA/β-TCP biocomposite screws were studied. After receiving the approval from the Institutional Review Board, the following data were collected preoperatively from all patients: physical examination, Lysholm score, Cincinnati, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) activity scores, and standard knee radiographs. In addition to these, follow-up assessments included Lachman and pivot-shift tests, Tegner scores, and KT side-to-side differences. Surgical failure was defined by a 2+ Lachman test, positive pivot-shift test, side-to-side KT difference of greater than 5 mm or subsequent ACL revision surgery. Approximately 95% of patients (99 of 104) with an average follow-up of 36 months (range, 24 to 68) are reported. The average age was 30 years (range, 13 to 57 years). Postoperatively, four patients demonstrated +1 Lachman score and one patient demonstrated a +2 Lachman score. Postoperative pivot-shift tests were a trace positive in one patients and +1 in two patients. The average KT side-to-side difference was 0.65 mm. All, but five patients, demonstrated KT side-to-side measurements of 3 mm or less and those five demonstrated measurements of 5 mm or less. No revision reconstructions were performed. Significant improvements in Cincinnati score (41 to 85 postoperative) and Lysholm score (46 to 90) were observed. The average postoperative Tegner score was 7. IKDC activity score increased from 2.3 to 3.1. Approximately 4% of patients (4 of 99) met the criteria for failure. A PLLA/PGA/β-TCP biocomposite interference fixation screw provides good graft fixation, with good radiographic incorporation, without adverse events.The level of evidence of the study is IV.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Graft: Comparison of Autograft, Fresh-Frozen Allograft, and γ-Irradiated Allograft

To compare clinical follow-up results of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using (1) autologous, (2) fresh-frozen allogeneic, and (3) γ-irradiated allogeneic bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB). From February 2002 to January 2006, 187 patients received BPTB ACL reconstruction at our center. One hundred forty-two consecutive patients who had received single-bundle BPTB ACL reconstruction were included in this study. Of these patients, 41 had autografts, 33 had fresh-frozen allografts, and 68 had γ-irradiated allografts. Clinical results were evaluated with the KT-1000 maximum displacement test (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA), Lachman test, and Lysholm, Irrgang, and Larson activity scales. The mean duration of follow-up was 6.7 ± 1.5 years (range, 4.2 to 8.2 years). There were 3 cases of acute synovitis due to immunologic rejection (fresh-frozen allografts) and 6 cases of failure (γ-irradiated allografts). KT-1000 examination showed more anterior laxity in the γ-irradiated allograft group compared with the autograft and fresh-frozen allograft groups (P < .05). The Lysholm, Irrgang, and Larson activity scales showed no difference among the 3 groups (P > .05). The study showed a statistically poorer KT-1000 result and higher failure rate in the γ-irradiated allograft group compared with the autograft and fresh-frozen allograft groups. This may suggest that γ-irradiated allograft is not a good candidate graft for ACL reconstruction. Power analysis showed that the study was underpowered, so further research and longer follow-up study are needed to make this point clearer. Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Correlation Between Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Obliquity and Tibial Rotation During Dynamic Pivoting Activities in Patients With Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An In Vivo Examination

To investigate the effect of coronal- and sagittal-plane anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft obliquity on tibial rotation (TR) range of motion (ROM) during dynamic pivoting activities after ACL reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft. We evaluated 19 ACL-reconstructed patients (mean age, 29 years; age range, 18 to 38 years; mean time interval postoperatively, 19.9 months) and 19 matched control subjects (mean age, 30.6 years; age range, 24 to 37 years) using motion analysis during (1) descending a stairway and pivoting and (2) landing from a jump and pivoting. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure the coronal and sagittal ACL graft angle. The dependent variables were TR ROM during pivoting and the side-to-side difference (SSD) in TR ROM between the reconstructed knee and the contralateral intact knee. TR ROM of the ACL-reconstructed knee was significantly increased compared with both the contralateral intact knee and the healthy control knee (P < .05). A significant positive correlation was observed between TR ROM and coronal ACL graft angle (r = 0.727, P = .0006 for descending and pivoting; r = 0.795, P = .0001 for landing and pivoting) as well as between SSD of TR ROM and coronal ACL graft angle (r = 0.789, P < .0001 for descending and pivoting; r = 0.799, P < .0001 for landing and pivoting). No correlation was found with the sagittal ACL graft angle. After ACL reconstruction with a BPTB graft, patients' knees showed higher TR values than their uninjured knees and the knees of uninjured control volunteers during dynamic pivoting activities. The findings of this study show that TR was better restored in ACL-reconstructed patients with a more oblique graft in the coronal plane. A similar relation was not observed for graft orientation in the sagittal plane. Although these data do not imply a cause-and-effect relation between the 2 variables, they may indicate that a more oblique placement of a single BPTB ACL graft in the coronal plane is correlated with better control of TR. Level IV, case series.