Bone-anchored Hearing Systems Research Articles

Evaluation of a super powerful bone-anchored hearing system and its users: A retrospective study.

Although the Baha 5SP has been commercially available for six years, very few studies have been performed on the device's efficacy. The current study aims to evaluate the characteristics and audiological results in patients with severe-to-profound mixed hearing loss fitted with this superpower sound processor. This retrospective evaluation was conducted at a tertiary referral centre where a series of 82 adult patients with severe-to-profound mixed hearing loss were implanted with a percutaneous bone-anchored hearing system and fitted with a superpower sound processor between 2016 and 2019. Patients with incomplete or unreliable audiological data (n = 24) were excluded, resulting in 58 data sets for analysis. The main outcome measures were unaided and aided pure-tone thresholds and aided free-field speech perception in quiet. The median unaided air conduction (AC) threshold averaged across 0.5, 1 and 2 kHz (PTA0.5-2kHz) of all patients was 75 dB hearing loss (HL); the median unaided AC averaged across 1, 2 and 4 kHz (PTA1-4kHz) was 84 dB HL. For bone conduction and direct bone conduction, the median PTA0.5-2kHz was 52 and 47 dB HL, respectively. With the superpower device, the median free-field speech reception threshold was 54 dB sound pressure level (SPL), and the median speech perception score at 65 dB SPL was 80%. At least 75% of the patients reached a maximum phoneme score of 70%. For patients with lower scores, the superpower device still provides a substantial hearing benefit. This makes the superpower device particularly suitable for patients with severe-to-profound mixed hearing loss with a contraindication for conventional hearing aids and/or cochlear implants.

Very Early Loading of a Bone-Anchored Hearing System Is Safe.

To investigate the feasibility of early sound processor loading with two separate bone-anchored hearing aid implants 1 to 2 weeks after implantation. Secondary endpoints included registration of any postoperative complications, skin reactions, and any adverse events. Prospective, nonrandomized, noncontrolled, multicenter clinical trial. Tertiary referral center. Sixty adult patients, eligible for bone-anchored hearing aid surgery, were enrolled. Implantation of the bone-anchored hearing aid implants were done using minimally invasive surgery with tissue preservation. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were recorded using resonance frequency analysis. Follow-ups were scheduled 5 to 12 days, 4 to 8 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. Differences between the lowest ISQ values (ISQ low) over time were analyzed by paired-samples t test with a significance level of 0.05. Skin and soft tissue reactions were assessed according to Holger's classification. Loading time of the Ponto Wide implant was 11.6 ± 1.4 days (SD) in average (median, 12 d; range, 7-19 d). Loading of the Ponto BHX implant was done 9.7 ± 3.5 days (SD) postoperatively (median, 9 d; range, 5-19 d). The implant stability increased significantly during the 12-month study period with both implants. One Ponto BHX implant was lost. Skin and soft tissue reactions were few in both groups. Across all planned follow-up visits, no skin and soft tissue reactions were observed in 86% (Ponto BHX implant) and 85% (Ponto Wide implant). Very early loading of sound processors after percutaneous bone-anchored hearing system surgery is safe already 1 to 2 weeks postoperatively.

Symmetrical placement of bilateral percutaneous bone-anchored hearing systems via guide-marker.

To investigate the use of a novel technique to estimate the symmetrical placement of percutaneous bone-anchored hearing systems (BAHS) with a guide-marker in patients undergoing bilateral surgery with this device. Prospective cohort study. A guide-marker and anatomical landmarks were used to estimate the implant placement and transferred to the contralateral ear in 12 subjects eligible for bilateral BAHS surgery. To investigate the bilateral symmetry, preoperative tri-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) image reconstruction was used to compare the distances between the mandibular condyle and implant placement estimation (mandible-implant distance) in both the right and left ears of the subjects. The guide-marker could be used to estimate the bilateral implant placement in all subjects included in this study, simply and easily, including one subject with craniofacial malformation. The mean mandible-implant distances were 5.37 and 5.38 cm, in the right and left ears of the subjects, respectively, and no differences were observed between them, thereby indicating optimal bilateral symmetry. The use of the guide-marker proved to be an effective tool to provide symmetrical placement of bilateral BAHS. We propose a novel method employing a simple guide-marker and tracing based on symmetrical anatomical landmarks to achieve precise placement and optimal symmetry and which may be easily adopted in the surgical routine of BAHS. 3.

Effect of freezing and embalming of human cadaveric whole head specimens on bone conduction

Background and aimsConserved specimens do not decay and therefore permit long-term experiments thereby overcoming limited access to fresh (frozen) temporal bones for studies on middle ear mechanics. We used a Thiel conservation method which is mainly based on a watery solution of salts. In contrast to pure Formalin, Thiel conservation aims to preserve the mechanical proprieties of human tissue. The aim of this study is to examine the effect of Thiel conservation on bone conduction in the same specimen before and after conservation. MethodsNine ears of five defrosted whole heads were stimulated with a direct, electrically driven, bone anchored hearing system (Baha, Baha SuperPower). The motion produced by bone conduction stimulation was measured with a single point laser Doppler vibrometer (LDV) at the promontory, the ossicular chain, and the round window through a posterior tympanotomy. After the initial experiments, the entire whole heads were placed in Thiel solution. In order to enable direct comparison between fresh frozen and Thiel specimens, our Thiel conservation did not include intravascular and intrathecal perfusion. The measurements were repeated 3 and 12 months later.To determine the effect of freezing, defrosting, and embalming on the whole heads, CT scans were performed at different stages of the experimental procedure. Additionally, three extracted temporal bones were stimulated a Baha, motion of the promontory measured by LDV and embalmed in Thiel solution to investigate the direct impact of Thiel solution on the bone. ResultsThe averaged magnitude of motion on the promontory increased in whole head specimens by a mean of 10.3 dB after 3 months of Thiel embalming and stayed stable after 12 months. A similar effect was observed for motion at the tympanic membrane (+7.2 dB), the stapes (+9.5 dB), and the round window (+4.0 dB). In contrast to the whole head specimens, the motion of the extracted temporal bones did not change after 3 months of Thiel embalming (-0.04 dB in average). CT scans of the whole heads after conservation showed a notable brain volume loss mostly >50% as well as a remarkable change in the consistency and structure of the brain. Partial changes could already be observed before the Thiel embalming but after 1–2 days of defrosting. In an additional experiment, a substitution of brain mass and weight by Thiel fluid did not lead to new deterioration in sound transmission. In contrast, a frozen (non-defrosted) whole head showed a distinctively reduced magnitude of promontory motion before defrosting. DiscussionFor our setup, the vibration of the ear due to bone conduction in the same whole head specimens significantly increased after Thiel conservation. Such an increase was not observed in extracted temporal bone specimens.Due to brain changes in the CT scans, we investigated the consequences of the brain volume changes and structure loss on the frozen brain before defrosting. The loss of brain volume alone could not explain the increase of ear vibrations, as we did not observe a difference when the volume was replaced with Thiel fluid. However, freezing and defrosting of the entire brain seems to have a major influence. Beside the destructive effect of freezing on the brain, the modified conservation method without perfusion changed the brain structure.In conclusion, bone conduction in whole heads depends on the physical condition of the brain, rather than on the conservation.

Virtual Surgical Planning for Accurate Placement of Bone-Anchored Hearing System.

Virtual Surgical Planning for Accurate Placement of Bone-Anchored Hearing System.

Non-invasive sampling procedure revealing the molecular events at different abutments of bone-anchored hearing systems-A prospective clinical pilot study.

To investigate the molecular activities in different compartments around the bone-anchored hearing system (BAHS) with either electropolished or machined abutments and to correlate these activities with clinical and microbiological findings. Twelve patients received machined or electropolished abutments after implant installation of BAHS. Peri-abutment fluid and tissue were collected from baseline to 12 months. Gene expression of cytokines and factors related to tissue healing and inflammation, regeneration and remodelling, as well as bacterial recognition were determined using quantitative-polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The clinical status was evaluated using the Holgers scoring system, and bacterial colonisation was investigated by culturing. The gene expression of inflammatory cytokines (IL-8, IL-1β, and IL-10) and bacteria-related Toll-like receptors (2 and 4) was higher in the peri-abutment fluid than at baseline and in the peri-abutment tissue at 3 and 12 months. Conversely, the expression of genes related to tissue regeneration (Coll1a1 and FOXO1) was higher in the tissue samples than in the peri-abutment fluid at 3 and 12 months. Electropolished abutments triggered higher expression of inflammatory cytokines (IL-8 and IL-1β) (in peri-abutment fluid) and regeneration factor FOXO1 (in peri-abutment tissue) than machined abutments. Several cytokine genes in the peri-abutment fluid correlated positively with the detection of aerobes, anaerobes and Staphylococcus species, as well as with high Holger scores. This study provides unprecedented molecular information on the biological processes of BAHS. Despite being apparently healed, the peri-abutment fluid harbours prolonged inflammatory activity in conjunction with the presence of different bacterial species. An electropolished abutment surface appears to be associated with stronger proinflammatory activity than that with a machined surface. The analysis of the peri-abutment fluid deserves further verification as a non-invasive sampling and diagnostic procedure of BAHS.

Pupillometry as a Measure of Listening Effort in Patients with Bone-Anchored Hearing Systems

The goal of this study is to assess speech comprehension and listening effort by means of pupillometry, in patients with bone-anchored hearing system (BAHS). The study was performed prospectively in a group of 21 hearing-impaired adults, unilaterally implanted with BAHS Ponto. Listening effort was compared in patients wearing two sound processors (Oticon Medical AB, Askim, Sweden): Ponto 3 SuperPower (P3SP) and Ponto Pro (PP). Every patient was invited to two visits, separated by a 3-month break. The first session was to establish the noise level needed to obtain 95% correct sentence recall in the hearing in noise test (HINT), when speech is presented at 70 dB SPL. During the second session, pupillometry, with the use of the above-mentioned conditions, was performed. The mean HINT scores obtained during the second visit were 96.3% for PP and 97.7% for P3SP (p = 0.9863). In pupillometry, no significant differences were found for average PPD (peak pupil dilation; p = 0.3247), average peak pupil dilation timing (p = 0.527) and for pupil dilation growth curves with both processors. The findings of this study suggest that BAHS users allocate similar listening effort with PP and P3SP when processing speech-in-noise at a sound pressure level not saturating Ponto Pro and at a fixed performance level of 95%. This finding applies to the patients who meet the qualification criteria for bone conduction devices and have BC in situ threshold average below 45 dB HL.

Percutaneous Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant: Is It Clinically Useful in Korean?

BackgroundThe aim of this study is to investigate the clinical effectiveness of Ponto in Korea, a recently released percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant.Methods16 patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) and mixed or conductive hearing loss who underwent Ponto implantation from December 2018 to September 2020 were enrolled in the study. Puretone audiometry, the Korean version of the Hearing in Noise Test (K-HINT), sound localization test (SLT), and Pupillometry were performed pre- and three months post-operation. Standardized questionnaires, the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE) and Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ), were administered.ResultsThe mean age of subjects was 55.5 (range, 48–67) years. Four males and 12 females participated in the study. The mean puretone average was 73.17 dB hearing level (HL) before surgery and significantly improved to 36.72 dB HL three months after surgery. The mean word recognition score improved from 26.0% to 90.75% after implantation. In the case of K-HINT, there was a significant difference in summation (Z = −2.250, P = 0.024) and head shadow effects (Z = −3.103, P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in root mean square error degree (RMSE) and hemifield identification scores for SLT testing. Pupillometry was performed to measure listening effort and the results revealed that the degree of pupillary dilatation decreased under the condition of quiet, 0 dB signal to noise ratio (SNR) and 3 dB SNR. The total score for HHIE decreased significantly (Z = −3.130, P = 0.002) while the SSQ score increased significantly (Z = −2.216, P = 0.027).ConclusionsThe Ponto bone-anchored hearing system showed significant clinical benefit in Korean patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss and SSD.

Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Laser-Ablated Titanium Implant System for Bone Anchored Hearing Systems in a Pediatric Population and the Relationship of Resonance Frequency Analysis With Implant Survival.

Objective:To evaluate the clinical outcomes of pediatric patients implanted a novel 4.5 mm wide laser ablated titanium bone anchored implant system and to evaluate the implant stability over the first 12-month period.Study Design:A prospective, single-subject, repeated measure, cohort study. Participants served as their own controls.Setting:Community and tertiary referral hospital pediatric assessment center.Patients:A total of 115 consecutive pediatric patients aged 4 to 15 years were implanted with 176 laser ablated titanium bone anchored implants from January 2016 to January 2019.Main Outcome Measure:Clinical outcomes, implant failure rates, and post implantation implant stability quotient (ISQ) scores were studied over the first 12-month period. Data were analyzed for statistical significance through mixed effect modeling, with the significance level p = 0.01.Results:A median 12-month survival of 96.6% was observed. Six implants (3.5%) were lost in total, one of these (0.6%) was lost due to trauma. Adverse skin reactions (Holgers grade 2–4) were observed in 4.4% of all postoperative visits, occurring in 22 individuals (19.1%). Neither the ISQ high (ISQH) nor ISQ low (ISQL) values increased significantly between the stage 1 and 2 surgeries. In contrast, the ISQ results, irrespective of abutment size, demonstrated an increasing trend from 49.1 to 57 over the 12 months review period. A statistically significant change was only demonstrated from the 3 months follow up onwards.Conclusion:The use of 4.5 mm wide laser-ablated titanium bone anchored hearing implants resulted in superior survival rates and excellent clinical outcomes compared with previous implant systems.

Influence of Compression Thresholds and Maximum Power Output on Speech Understanding with Bone-Anchored Hearing Systems.

Bone-anchored hearing systems (BAHS) transmit sound via osseointegrated implants behind the ear. They are used to treat patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss, but speech understanding may be limited especially in users with substantial additional cochlear hearing losses. In recent years, BAHS with higher maximum power output (MPO) and more advanced digital processing including loudness compression have become available. These features may be useful to increase speech understanding in users with mixed hearing loss. We have tested the effect of 4 combinations of two different MPO levels (highest level available and level reduced by 12 dB) and two different compression thresholds (CT) levels (50 dB and 65 dB sound pressure level) in 12 adult BAHS users on speech understanding in quiet and in noise. We have found that speech understanding in quiet was not influenced significantly by any of the changes in these two fitting parameters. In contrast, in users with average bone-conduction (BC) threshold of 25 dB or more, speech understanding in noise was improved by +0.8 dB to +1.1 dB (p < 0.03) when using the higher MPO level. In this user group, there may be an additional, but very small benefit of +0.1 dB to +0.4 dB when using the lower rather than the higher CT value, but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.27). In users with better average BC thresholds than 25 dB, none of the improvement was statistically significant. Higher MPOs and possibly, to a lesser degree, lower CTs seem to be able to improve speech understanding in noise in users with higher BC thresholds, but even their combined effect seems to be limited.

Postoperative Benefit of Bone Anchored Hearing Systems: Behavioral Performance and Self-Reported Outcomes.

Introduction Bone anchored hearing solutions are a well-known option for patients with a conductive, mixed conductive-sensorineural hearing loss and those with single-sided deafness. Objective The aim of the present study was to evaluate the Ponto bone-anchored hearing system in terms of behavioral performance and self-reported outcomes, by comparing unaided and aided performance (softband and abutment), as well as aided performance with the sound processor on softband (preoperatively) versus abutment (postoperatively). Methods Fourteen adult bone-anchored candidates, with either a bilateral ( n = 12) or unilateral ( n = 2) conductive or mixed hearing loss, participated in the present study. Sound-field hearing thresholds were evaluated unaided and aided (softband and abutment). A speech-in-noise test was also performed unaided and aided for two spatial configurations (S0N90; implanted side; S0N90; nonimplanted side). The Glasgow Health Status Inventory and the Speech, Spatial and Quality of sound questionnaires were administered pre- and postsurgery to compare quality of life and perceived unaided and aided performance. Skin reaction (Holgers scores) was evaluated at 15 days, 6 weeks, and 10 weeks after surgery. Results Significant improvements postoperatively relative to unaided were obtained for sound-field thresholds at all tested frequencies. Additionally, sound-field thresholds were significantly improved with the sound processor on abutment relative to the softband at frequencies > 1 kHz. Improved performance postoperatively relative to unaided was also obtained in the speech-in-noise test and in self-reported outcomes. Conclusions Improvements in behavioral performance and self-reported outcomes were obtained with the sound processor mounted on abutment.

Output performance of the novel active transcutaneous bone conduction implant Sentio at different stimulation sites

ObjectivesThe output performance of a novel semi–implantable transcutaneous bone conduction device was compared to an established percutaneous bone-anchored hearing system device using cadaver heads. The influence of actuator position, tissue growth below the actuator and mounting it on the surface or in a flattened bone bed on the performance of the implanted actuator was investigated. Materials and MethodsThe percutaneous and the new transcutaneous device were sequentially implanted at two sites in five human cadaver heads: 55 mm superior-posterior to the ear canal opening (position A) and, closer to the cochlea, about 20 mm inferior-posterior to the ear canal opening behind the pinna on the mastoid (position B). The ipsi- and contralateral cochlear promontory (CP) velocity magnitude responses to percutaneous and transcutaneous stimulation were measured using laser Doppler vibrometry. In addition, the CP vibration of the transcutaneous device placed directly on the skull bone surface was compared with the placement in a flattened bone bed at a depth of about 3 mm. Finally, the influence of placing a thin silicone interposition layer under the implanted transducer was also explored. ResultsThe percutaneous device provided about an 11 dB higher average CP vibration level than the transcutaneous device at frequencies between 0.5 and 10 kHz. The ipsilateral CP vibration responses with stimulations at position B were on average 13 dB higher compared to stimulation at position A. The placement of the transcutaneous transducer at position B provided similar or higher average vibration magnitudes than the percutaneous transducer at position A. The 3 mm deep flattened bone bed had no significant effects on the output performance. Placing a thin silicone layer under the transcutaneous transducer had no significant influence on the output of the transcutaneous device. ConclusionsOur results using the CP vibration responses show that at frequencies above 500 Hz the new transcutaneous device at position B provides similar output levels as the percutaneous device at position A. The results also indicated that neither a bone bed for the placement of the transcutaneous transducer nor a simulated tissue growth between the actuator and the bone affect the output performance of the device.

Comparison between linear incision and punch techniques for bone anchored hearing aid surgery.

SUMMARYObjectivesTo evaluate mean surgical time, incidence of soft tissue reactions, implant survival and intraoperative complications in both minimally invasive ponto surgery (MIPS) and the linear incision with tissue preservation technique (LT).MethodsA retrospective review was carried out on 48 bone anchored hearing system (BAHS) patients between 2014 and 2019: 13 patients had undergone LT and formed one group, while 35 patients had undergone MIPS and formed the second group. Mean surgical time, intraoperative complications, implant loss and skin reaction were assessed at each post-operative examination. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for statistical analysis.ResultsThe difference in the mean surgical time of 15 mins for MIPS and 36 mins for LT was statistically significant. No intraoperative complications were reported and implant survival was 100% in both groups. The incidence of adverse skin reactions was 7.7% for the LT group and 0% for the MIPS group at first follow-up examination.ConclusionsSurgical mean time is shorter for MIPS, making this procedure more suitable for local anaesthesia and more cost effective. Moreover, both LT and MIPS demonstrate good surgical outcomes in terms of skin reactions according to Holgers score and equally excellent implant survival.

Benefit of Higher Maximum Force Output in Bone Anchored Hearing Systems: A Crossover Study.

Objective:To investigate how higher maximum force output (MFO) in bone anchored hearing systems (BAHS) affects perceived benefit and the subjective experience of sound as well as hearing outcomes in subjects with mixed hearing loss.Study Design:Prospective single-center, randomized crossover design (A-B-A) with within-subject control design.Patients:The study included 19 experienced BAHS users with mixed hearing loss in the fitting range of a standard BAHS.Interventions:The study evaluated two sound processors with differing MFOs and sizes—Device A: standard sound processor with a lower MFO and Device B: superpower sound processor with a higher MFO.Outcome Measures:Speech recognition in noise at different signal to noise ratios, aided thresholds, and questionnaires.Results:Speech recognition test showed significant improvements using Device B compared with Device A at both 78 dB SPL (mean difference: 9%) and 75 dB SPL (mean difference: 12%) (p < 0.05). Moreover, speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ12-C) showed a significantly greater perceived benefit with Device B concerning spatial abilities (mean: 0.5–0.6) (p < 0.05). At the conclusion of the study, 58% of participants chose to keep Device A for further use. The main reasons for this were the size of the sound processor and a more comfortable sound experience.Conclusions:A BAHS sound processor with a higher MFO leads to improved speech-in-noise performance in loud/noisy listening situations and is perceived as significantly better to process spatial information in daily listening situations. However, the relation between cosmetics and performance is not straightforward, and several factors seem to affect the selection process of BAHS.

Cochlear Implantation and Other Treatments in Single-Sided Deafness and Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Results of a National Multicenter Study Including a Randomized Controlled Trial

Introduction: Cochlear implantation is a recent approach proposed to treat single-sided deafness (SSD) and asymmetric hearing loss (AHL). Several cohort studies showed its effectiveness on tinnitus and variable results on binaural hearing. The main objective of this study is to assess the outcomes of cochlear implantation and other treatment options in SSD/AHL on quality of life. Methods: This prospective multicenter study was conducted in 7 tertiary university hospitals and included an observational cohort study of SSD/AHL adult patients treated using contralateral routing of the signal (CROS) hearing aids or bone-anchored hearing systems (BAHSs) or who declined all treatments, and a randomized controlled trial in subjects treated by cochlear implantation, after failure of CROS and BAHS trials. In total, 155 subjects with SSD or AHL, with or without associated tinnitus, were enrolled. After 2 consecutive trials with CROS hearing aids and BAHSs on headband, all subjects chose any of the 4 treatment options (abstention, CROS, BAHS, or cochlear implant [CI]). The subjects who opted for a CI were randomized between 2 arms (CI vs. initial observation). Six months after the treatment choice, quality of life was assessed using both generic (EuroQoL-5D, EQ-5D) and auditory-specific quality-of-life indices (Nijmegen Cochlear implant Questionnaire [NCIQ] and Visual Analogue Scale [VAS] for tinnitus severity). Performances for speech-in-noise recognition and localization were measured as secondary outcomes. Results: CROS was chosen by 75 subjects, while 51 opted for cochlear implantation, 18 for BAHSs, and 11 for abstention. Six months after treatment, both EQ-5D VAS and auditory-specific quality-of-life indices were significantly better in the “CI” arm versus “observation” arm. The mean effect of the CI was particularly significant in subjects with associated severe tinnitus (mean improvement of 20.7 points ± 19.7 on EQ-5D VAS, 20.4 ± 12.4 on NCIQ, and 51.4 ± 35.4 on tinnitus). No significant effect of the CI was found on binaural hearing results. Before/after comparisons showed that the CROS and BAHS also improved significantly NCIQ scores (for CROS: +7.7, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = [4.5; 10.8]; for the BAHS: +14.3, 95% CI = [7.9; 20.7]). Conclusion: Cochlear implantation leads to significant improvements in quality of life in SSD and AHL patients, particularly in subjects with associated severe tinnitus, who are thereby the best candidates to an extension of CI indications.

A retrospective evaluation of minimally invasive ponto surgery (MIPS) in two pediatric centers

Background Percutaneous bone anchored hearing systems have been used effectively for over forty years with low rates of complications. Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery (MIPS) is a surgical technique performed through a puncture hole that has been reported to minimize soft tissue trauma and decrease operative time. Due to it being a relatively new procedure there remains a paucity of pediatric outcomes data. Methods Pediatric patients from two tertiary pediatric otolaryngology centers between 2016 and 2019 who underwent MIPS were included in this study. Charts were retrospectively reviewed for indications for surgery, implant and abutment type, overlying skin thickness, skin-to-skin time, Holgers score at three, six and twelve months, revision surgery and time to abutment fitting. Results Fourteen patients, two with bilateral procedures met inclusion criteria (mean age = 8.07 ± 2.87years). The mean overlying skin thickness was 5.13 ± 3.18mm. 9.44% of visits had an adverse skin reactionOne patient required surgery forskin overgrowth. One implant loss (6.3%) was reported, following trauma to the abutment. Mean MIPS skin to skin times were 12.4 ± 2.6 min, markedly different that the Baha® Attract and Connect which were 56 and 53 min, respectively. Conclusion This study represents the largest pediatric MIPS cohort to date, and our results are similar to published adult studies.

Bone-anchored hearing system, contralateral routing of signals hearing aid or cochlear implant: what is best in single-sided deafness?

PurposeThe aim of the study was to compare long-term results after 1 year in patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) who were fitted with different hearing aids. The participants tested contralateral routing of signals (CROS) hearing aids and bone-anchored hearing systems (BAHS). They were also informed about the possibility of a cochlear implant (CI) and chose one of the three devices. We also investigated which factors influenced the choice of device.MethodsProspective study with 89 SSD participants who were divided into three groups by choosing BAHS, CROS, or CI. All participants received test batteries with both objective hearing tests (speech perception in noise and sound localisation) and subjective questionnaires.Results16 participants opted for BAHS-, 13 for CROS- and 30 for CI-treatment. The greater the subjective impairment caused by SSD, the more likely patients were to opt for surgical treatment (BAHS or CI). The best results in terms of speech perception in noise (especially when sound reaches the deaf ear and noise the hearing ear), sound localization, and subjective results were achieved with CI.ConclusionThe best results regarding the therapy of SSD are achieved with a CI, followed by BAHS. This was evident both in objective tests and in the subjective questionnaires. Nevertheless, an individual decision is required in each case as to which SSD therapy option is best for the patient. Above all, the patient's subjective impairment and expectations should be included in the decision-making process.

Expanding the indications for the bone anchored hearing system (BAHS) in patients with single sided deafness

PurposeProvide data to support expansion of FDA indications for the Bone anchored hearing system (BAHS). Materials and methodsThis retrospective study in a tertiary otologic referral center included106 consecutive subjects who were implanted with a Bone Anchored Hearing System (BAHS) between January 2009 and January 2015 for single sided deafness. Subjects were divided into three groups by bone conduction pure tone average (PTA) of the better hearing ear: 0–20 dB (group 1), 21–40 dB (group 2) and 41–55 dB (group 3). All patients underwent BAHS implantation. Speech perception data (Hearing In Noise Test and Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant testing) was collected before and after surgical intervention. Patient-reported quality of life measures were obtained at least 6 months after activation. These included the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit and Glasgow Benefit Inventory. ResultsAll three groups of subjects demonstrated statistically significant improvement in outcome measures following BAHS. Subject reported quality of life outcome measures demonstrated significant improvement in disability from hearing loss and in quality of life. ConclusionsPatients with single sided deafness who have bone conduction thresholds worse than 20 dB in their contralateral ear are still able to benefit significantly from BAHS.

Post-operative infection rates in linear vs. punch technique for bone anchored hearing systems.

This study investigates the post-operative infection rates between two surgical approaches: linear incision and the punch technique for bone anchored hearing systems. Secondarily, it investigates the impact of smoking, comorbid disease, and operative conditions on post-operative skin reactions and infections. A retrospective study was conducted at a single tertiary care institution. A single surgeon completed either of the two techniques on adult patients with mixed, conductive hearing loss, or single sided-deafness. Patients included had at least 6months follow-up, and were evaluated for preexisting illnesses, perioperative complications, length of surgery, and post-operative complications including infection after surgery. Post-operative soft tissue around the abutment was assessed with Holgers Classification scale. Fifty-one patients were included in this study, 28 female and 23 males with an average age of 68.8. Thirty-three patients underwent linear incision surgery and 18 had the punch technique. Overall 9 patients (17.6%) had post-operative infections requiring topical or oral antibiotic treatment. Six (18.2%) were in the linear group and 3 (16.7%) in the punch group. There was no statistically significantly difference (p=1). A multivariate analysis compared age, sex, obesity, DM, operative time, skin thickness, and abutment size to post-operative skin infection rates requiring treatment. Only DM was statistically correlative with infection (p=0.02). No significant differences in post-operative infections were identified comparing linear incision and the punch techniques. Patients with diabetes had a higher incidence of post-operative skin infections rates.

Surgical and audiological results of bone-anchored hearing aids: comparison of two surgical techniques

IntroductionThe bone-anchored hearing system has become the most viable treatment option for subjects with conductive or mixed hearing loss, who are unable to benefit from conventional hearing aids or middle ear surgery. ObjectiveTo compare the surgical and audiological outcomes between the minimally-invasive Ponto surgery and a linear incision with soft tissue preservation techniques in bone-anchored hearing system recipients. MethodsA retrospective study was carried out from January 2017 to June 2018. Forty-two adult patients eligible for unilateral bone-anchored hearing system surgery with the Ponto system were included in the study. The implant and abutment lengths used varied from 3 to 4mm and from 6 to 14mm, according to the bone and skin thickness of the participants, respectively. ResultsTwenty-two surgeries were performed using the minimally invasive Ponto surgery technique (52.4%) and 20 (47.6%) using the linear incision. The mean age of the subjects implanted with minimally invasive Ponto surgery and linear incision techniques were 42.0 and 33.3 years old, respectively. Ten male (45,5%) and 14 (70%) female patients were implanted using minimally invasive Ponto surgery and the linear incision techniques, respectively. There were no differences between pure tone audiometric thresholds and monosyllabic word recognition scores of the subjects, when comparing both surgical techniques. The minimally invasive Ponto surgery technique significantly reduced the surgical time compared to the linear incision technique. There were no differences between both surgical techniques for skin-related complications; (Holgers 3 and 4) which occurred in 18.8% for MIPS and in 25% for linear incision. Subjects included in the minimally invasive Ponto surgery technique group showed a superior cosmetic outcome, with no surgical scar or additional sutures. ConclusionThe surgical and audiological outcomes were satisfactory and were not correlated to the surgical technique selected in all subjects. When compared to the linear incision, the minimally invasive Ponto surgery technique showed reduced surgical time and superior esthetic outcomes in the postoperative follow-up.